Upload
profjnapoles
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 1410983%283%29
1/5
Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal2014; X(X): XX-XXPublished online MM DD 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishingg oup.co!/"/p#!")doi: 10.11$4%/".XXXX.2014XXXX.XX&'' : 2 2$-*+*0 (P int); &'' : 2 2$-*%12 (,nline)
On the construction of regions of stabilityLuciano Miguel Lugo 1, Juan Eduardo Npoles Valds 1, 2 , Samuel Ivn Noya 2
1 #cult#d de ienci#s #ct#s 3 . 5ibe t#d 6640 ( 400) o ientes 378 9& 32 #cult#d 7egion#l 7esistenci# 9 ench 414 ( 600) 7esistenci# 378 9& 3
Email address:l!l!b #hoo.co!.# (5. M. 5ugo) "n#polese #.unne.edu.# (#ld?s) s#!ueli #nno # g!#il.co! ('. &. o #)@
o ci!e !"is ar!icle:5uci#no Miguel 5ugo #ld?s '#!uel & =n o #. ,n the onst uction oA 7egions oA 't#bilit . Pure and Applied
Mathematics Journal. >ol. X o. X 2014 pp. XX-XX. doi: 10.11$4%/".XXXX.2014XXXX.XX
#$s!rac!: &n this p#pe we built # st#bilit egion # ound the o igin Ao the 5i?n# d eBu#tion (4) to ensu e st#bilit #nd boundedness oA solutions oA this eBu#tion without !#Cing use oA the cl#ssic#l 'econd Method oA 5 #puno . e co!p# eou esult with so!e othe s p oposed b diAAe ent #utho s.
%ey&ords: 5 #puno 9 #"ecto ies 3s !ptotic Builib iu!
1' In!roduc!ion
9he te ! Est#bilit F o igin#tes in Mech#nic toch# #cte iGe the eBuilib iu! oA # igid bod . 'o theeBuilib iu! is c#lled st#ble iA the bod etu ns to its o igin#l
position h# ing been Edistu bedF b being !o ed slightlA o! its position oA est. &A the bod #Ate # slightdispl#ce!ent tends tow# d # new position its eBuilib iu! isc#lled unst#ble.
9he 'econd Method oA 5 #puno h#s been est#blished #sthe !ost gene #l !ethod to stud the st#bilit oA eBuilib iu! positions oA s ste!s desc ibed b diAAe enti#ldiAAe ences o Aunction#l eBu#tions (o s ste!s). 9his!ethod w#s Aound in cl#ssic#l !e!o oA 3le #nde Mi"#Hlo ich 5 #puno 1 published in 7ussi#n in 1%*2t #nsl#ted into ench in 1*0+ ( ep inted 40 e# s l#te 2)
1
Io n on
8/11/2019 1410983%283%29
2/5
2 5uci#no Miguel 5ugo et al. : ,n the onst uction oA 7egions oA 't#bilit
dete !ine the st#bilit #nd #s !ptotic st#bilit oA # s ste!without e plicitl integ #ting the nonline# diAAe enti#leBu#tion) is the en#!ed te t JoshiG#w# oA the si t 4. &n theBu#lit#ti e stud oA # nonline# s ste! whethe #utono!ous
K ( ); 7 n (1)
o non-#utono!ous
K ( t); 7 n (2)
suppose th#t (t ) is continuous in (t ) on & D whe e D is# connected open set in 7 n & denote the inte #l 0 tN #nd7 n denote the uclide#n n-sp#ce with the no ! . &n theBu#lit#ti e theo so!e oA the !ost studied Bu#lit#ti e
p ope ties # e st#bilit #s !ptotic st#bilit #nd the boundedness (#lso c#lled continu#bilit ) 6:
9he solution O(t) oA (2) is stable in the Lyapunov sense iA Ao #n 0 #nd #n t 0 & the e e ists (t0 ) 0
such th#t iA ( ) #s .&A >R is not identic#ll Ge o #long #n solution othe th#n
the o igin then the s ste! (1) is co!pletel st#ble +.9he !#in diAAicult in using 9heo e! I oAten is th#t one
c#n const uct # 5 #puno Aunction s#tisA ing the th eeeBui e!ents. Sence it is !uch e#sie to stud the
boundedness oA the solutions #s # sep# #te p oble! A o!which # ises the need to build #pp op i#te egions whe e
we c#n ensu e the boundedness.Iuilding the st#bilit egion oA # gi en eBu#tion is
#nothe w# to stud the p oble! oA con e gence #s t tendsto inAinit oA #ll solutions oA this eBu#tion. 9his p oble! isoA # p# #!ount ele #nce in the Bu#lit#ti e theo .
9he pu pose oA this note is to const uct # new st#bilitegion Ao eBu#tion ( ) using # diAAe ent #pp o#ch oA e# lie esults #nd without !#Cing uses oA co!!on conditions.i st we su!!# iGe Cnow esults we p esent b illust #tionthe p ooA oA Ai st #nd l#te we p esent ou esults.
2' (reliminary )esul!shile the e # e so!e p e ious esults in the AiAties t he
Ai st esult oA this n#tu e w#s obt#ined b 5#'#lle in 1*$0when he showed th#t #ll solutions oA (4) # e st#ble #nd
bounded using #n #pp op i#te bounded egion.
2.1. Region 1 8
9heo e! 1. nde #ssu!ptions #) #nd b) iA we h# e
)( x F x
duu f 0
)( Q #s x
6
A. 9heo e!s 4 #nd 6 oA 5#'#lle (1*$0).7 ontinu#ble Ao us.
8 5#'#lle (1*$0).
8/11/2019 1410983%283%29
3/5
Pu e #nd 3pplied M#the!#tics K(4)( ) KQg( ) K T g( )Qg( )( - ( )) Tg ( ) ( ) 0.
'o we h# e >K (4)( ) 0 in #n subset oA . 5et be theegion deAinite b
= )(/)( 2 y x ! y x# with is #
positi e e#l nu!be such th#t . &t is cle# th#t the bette #lue oA is the lowest #lue between 8(#) #nd 8(T#).3g#in we h# e the no positi it oA >K (4)( ) we
gu# #ntee the boundedness #nd st#bilit oA solutionsst# ting in (7egion 2 in the Aigu e bellow).
Region 2
2.3. Our Region 12
hile the const uction oA the st#bilit egion c#n be #tti!es b the 'econd Method oA 5 #puno we sh#lldis eg# d it in the esults p esented below.10
'ee S#s#n #nd Vhu (200+).11
A. J#det# (201 ).12 3 p eli!in# e sion oA this esult w#s p esented #t the 3nnu#l Meeting oA
the M3 l#st e# . 'ee 5ugo =poles #nd o # (201 ).
8/11/2019 1410983%283%29
4/5
4 5uci#no Miguel 5ugo et al. : ,n the onst uction oA 7egions oA 't#bilit
e ne t gi e # st#bilit egion #llowing us to obt#insuAAicient conditions Ao the boundedness #nd st#bilit oA solutions oA the s ste! (4) #nd conseBuentl Ao theeBu#tion ( ).
9heo e! . &A in #ddition to conditions #) #nd b) we h# e
A g(7) {A (7)/A( )T g( ) 0 iA 0; A( )Q g( ) 0 iA
N0 }then #ll solutions oA (4) # e st#ble #nd bounded.
P ooA. 5et ( (t) (t)) be # solution oA (4) with initi#l#lue( (0) (0)) ( 0 0) #nd we t#Ce the egion:
+=$
% & x' G$ y( x ) ! & y * x' +G$ .
he e C is # positi e e#l nu!be s#tisA ing the eBu#tion
$ xG$ y
1)( 00 += ; #nd #nd # e the solutions oA
eBu#tion +$
% & x' G = (note th#t p oposed eBu#tion to Aind
the #lue oA C is eBui #lent to #sCing th#t the solutionEst# tF on the bound# oA the egion).
#lcul#ting the slopes oA the bound# we h# e:
L)(
)( x
x g xd yd
x$g == A o! he e we h# e th#t
$ x
1L= iA 0
L)(
)( x
x g xd yd
x$g == whe e
$
x 1
L = iA N0.
Our Region
'o iA we h# e$
x 1
L= iA 0 #nd$
x 1
L = iA N0
the t #"ecto ies th#t begin #t the bound# oA this egionEA#llF into the s#!e which ensu es the st#bilit #ndcontinu#bilit oA the solution conside ed (see ,u 7egion inthe p e ious Aigu e).
*' +inal )emar s7egion 1 h#s 4 points oA inte section in the gi en
bound# #nd those points c#n not spe#C oA de i ed .9he 7egion 2 does not h# e th#t p oble! but #s the#lue oA # is Ai ed in #d #nce the p oposed egion
c#n not co e #ll solutions oA the eBu#tion .7egion h#s the #d #nt#ge th#t it w#s not neededto deAine # 5 #puno Aunction (so in ce t#in sense
is # con e se theo e!) #nd #lso includes #nsolution to the eBu#tion since this egion isconst ucted when the initi#l condition . 9hedis#d #nt#ge is th#t it h#s 2 points oA inte section
between the gi en edges whe e no one c#n spe#C oA de i ed .3s #n #tte!pt to o e co!e the #bo e !entioned8uido iGGi const ucted # A#!il 5 #punoAunctions1 which we e tended 14 to non-#utono!ous5i?n# d eBu#tion RRQA( ) RQ#(t)g( ) 0 t#Cing #s #5 #puno Aunction Ao the A#!il
)()()(
1)( xG y x,
t a y xt +=
.
ith = x
ds s g xG0
)()( #nd
+=
)(
01
)( x F y
s
sds y x,
which #llowed us to deAine
#s the Aollowing sets:
7 2 iA0
W( ): ( )- -1 iA 0
W( ): N ( )- -1 iA N0.
9he esult obt#ined in the 9heo e! is consistentwith so!e p e ious esults oA the second #utho 16.
)e-erencesU1Y 3cost#
8/11/2019 1410983%283%29
5/5
Pu e #nd 3pplied M#the!#tics #ldes