14 INPRO Infrastructure Presentation Final3(슬라이드 노트 KEPCO

2

3

ü Completion ofKori #1 (1978)

ü Completion of theFirst OPR1000 (1995)

üExport to UAE (2009)üFirst APR1400 is

under construction(2014)

4

■ : Nuclear■ : Coal■ : Oil■ : LNG■ : Hydro■ : Renewable

Installed Capacity(31.Dec. 2013)

86.2GW

20.7GW

25.5GW5GW

22.7GW

6.3GW6GW

5

Considering energy security, environment protection

and industrial competitiveness, share of nuclear

energy will gradually increase to 29% in 2035- The 2nd Master Plan for National Energy (Jan. 2014)

147GW

0

50

100

150

2024 2035

[Effective Capacity by Year in Korea]6

28% 29%

36GW 43GW

129GW147GW

7

Act

Enforcement Decree

Enforcement Regulations(Prime Minister’s Regulation)

8

Enforcement Regulations(Prime Minister’s Regulation)

Technical Standards (NSSC Regulations)

Regulatory StandardsRegulatory Guidelines

Guideline for Safety Review & InspectionIndustrial Code and Standards

[Legal and Regulatory Structure]

PresidentPresident

Prime Minister

Other Government Ministries

Ministry of Trade,Industry and Energy

Ministry of science,ICT and Future Planning

National Assembly

Nuclear Safety and Security commissionNuclearSafetyRegulation

Other Government Ministries

Ministry of Trade,Industry and Energy

Ministry of science,ICT and Future Planning

KINS, KINACNuclear industry Nuclear Research

and Development

NuclearSafetyRegulation

NSSC (Nuclear Safety and Security Commission)-Regulatory enforcement authority-Independent, stand-alone, vice minister-level government agency

KINS (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety) −Quasi-government agency, entirely dedicated to nuclear safety regulation

KINAC (Korea Institute of Nuclear Nonproliferation and Control) −Quasi-government agency, for maintaining the efficient implementation of safeguards, export/import controls and

securities related to nuclear facilities and materials

Government Organizations concerning Nuclear Energy

9

Nuclear Safety & SecurityCommission(NSSC)

TechnicalCommittee

Nuclear Industries(KEPCO, KHNP, etc)

Technical ExpertOrganizations

(KINS & KINAC)

Conduct Review, Inspection andRequest Additional information

Submit Information andImplementation Results

10

[General Structure of Nuclear Regulation & Licensing]

5 6 7 8 9

■ : Private■ : Public

Unit : Billion $

R&D 1.0 Bil. $

Capital 2.6 Bil. $

Fuel 0.9 Bil. $

O&M 1.4 Bil. $

5.3 5.4

4.0 4.3

6.7

7.8 8.1 8.3 8.0

0 1 2 3 4 5

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

11

[Total Investment Trend in Nuclear Sector between ‘03~’12]

O&M 1.4 Bil. $

Radiation 0.1 Bil. $

Waste 0.65Bil.$

Labor 0.5 Bil. $

Others 0.85Bil.$

Investment (2012)

3.24.0 4.3

100

120

140 Unit : GW ■ : Others ■ : Nuclear ■ : Peak Demand

100GW

126GW 130GW 131GW

0

20

40

60

80

100

2015 2020 2025 2027

12

[Expansion Plan and Peak Demand by Year]

100GW

25GW 30GW 36GW 36GW25% 24% 28% 27%

13

Health, Safety and Security, Engineering & Cost, Environmental Factors, etc., all are considered and scrutinized during Siting.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Trade, Industry & Energy Committee

OverseasProject

EquipmentManufacturing

Design &Engineering

Operation &Management

Korea’s Wholehearted Commitment &

Support for Nuclear Power

Trade, Industry & Energy Committee Nuclear

Fuel ConstructionMaintenance& Services

R&D PublicAcceptance

RadwasteManagement

Education &R&D

ExportControl

Nuclear Safety

Nuclear Medical

KoreanNuclearSociety

Women Interested in Nuclear

The KoreanSociety forNondestructiveTesting

Korea AtomicIndustrialForum

KoreaCoatingExpertsSociety14

Korea’s Wholehearted Commitment &

Support for Nuclear Power

Security of Energy Supply

StimulatingAll Industries

Reduction in GHG Emmissions

• Power Source Covering Base Load

• High Capacity Factor(Over 80%)

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000

'08 '10 '12 '13

■ Total ■ Nuclear(108 KWh)

36% 31% 30% 27%

Contribution to Economic Growth

StimulatingAll Industries

Reduction in GHG Emmissions

Added Value

• Power Source Covering Base Load

• High Capacity Factor(Over 80%)

• Heavy industry • Construction• OA System• I&C System• Medicine, etc.

• Electricity Price(18.5%▲) VsConsumer Price (240%▲)

• Cheapest Electricity Source

※ Production Cost (2013)

Gen.(‘12)(GWh)

GHG reduction

Cost(Bil. $)

150,327 124Mil.Ton

1.4

• Nuclear Contribution

(source: White Paper on Nuclear Power Generation 2013

(source: KPX “2013 Power Market Statistics” 15

• White Paper• Safety Zone : Nuclear Energy • Safety Zone: Energy Zone


•

Safety Zone: Energy Camp• Teacher Training

Camp• Nuclear Knowl--edge Concert

• Olympiad, etc.

•



• Olympiad, etc.

•

•Email• Newsletter• Official Website• SNS (Twitter, ..)• Nuclear HubSite “Atom Story”

•


•

•Program informing Nuclear Policy, safety

•


•

•Forums ofexperts andopinion leaders

• Policy of openingNPPs to the public (via Official web-site)

•



Education Program Digital PR Press & Media Others

For General Public & Residents in the Vicinity of the Facilities

Publications

16



•



• Olympiad, etc.

•



• Olympiad, etc.

•


•


•


•


•



•



q Deliberation on issuesq Workshops……

q Opinions are reflected in EIA

Public Hearings/Inquiries for Siting

Participation in Gov’ Meetings

17

q Nuclear Safety Committeeq Civil Environmental Monitorq Running a Hot-line

q by online or mailq The Ombudsman Systemq Panel of experts committee

Proposals and Recommendation

Participation as Local Residents

100

1. Nuclear power is Necessary

100100100

2. Increasing /maintaining NPPs

3. Nuclear as electricity source

4. Nuclear power contributes stable power supply.

■ Favorable ■ Unfavorable

0

20

40

60

80

Aug.13 Oct.13 May. 140

20

40

60

80

100


20

40

60

80

100


20

40

60

80


18

Survey TargetSurvey Target General Public RespondentsRespondents 1,000~1,500

AgencyAgency• Korea Research• Korea Gallup, etc. NoteNote

• People over the age of 19• By home phone or mobile

86%84%

75%

78%75%

69%

74%70%

77%

88%90%

87%

RE

0

50

100

150

2020 2027

RE

0

50

100

150

2024 2035

19

(source: The 2nd MPNE)(source: The 6th BPE)

126W

30GW24%

131GW

36GW27%

129GW

36GW28%

147GW

43GW29%

■ : Ruling Saenuri■ : New Politics Alliance■ : Reserved■ : Justice■ : Progressive

20

RERE

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20

■ : 1st BPE (Aug. 02) ■ : 2nd BPE (Dec. 04)■ : 3rd BPE (Dec. 06)

Unit : MW 41%

31%22%

■ : Ruling Saenuri■ : New Politics Alliance■ : Reserved■ : Justice■ : Progressive

(source: Korea Gallup)

[Planned Nuclear Expansion (1st ~ 3rd BPE)] [Support Rate (1st Week . Jul. 2014)]

3%3%

■ : Design/Engineering■ : Construction■ : Manufacture■ : O&M■ : Nuclear Safety■ : R&D■ : Admin’ & Mgmt.■ : NDT, other

8,000

10,000 ■: KEPCO, KHNP ■ : Manufacture ■: Service ■ : Design ■: Construction ■ : R&D■: Other Public ■ : Trade

9.6%13.9%

21

RERE

■ : Design/Engineering■ : Construction■ : Manufacture■ : O&M■ : Nuclear Safety■ : R&D■ : Admin’ & Mgmt.■ : NDT, other

(source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012)

Total28,195

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

'04 '06 '08 '10 '12(source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012)

■: KEPCO, KHNP ■ : Manufacture ■: Service ■ : Design ■: Construction ■ : R&D■: Other Public ■ : Trade

14.2%

13.9%

11.8%

9.6%

21%13.6%

6.3%

8,000

10,000 ■ : Permanent■ : Temporary

25,000

30,000 ■ : Permanent■ : Temporary32% 32% 91%

RERE

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

20s 30s 40s 50s 60s0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

▲ ★ ● Total

▲ : KEPCO, KHNP ★ : Manufacture, construction● : R&D, Other Public Sector

(source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012) (source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012)

22

15%20%

1%

98%

2%

89%

11%82%

18%

9%

KAERI(Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)

Nuclear Training & Education Center(NTC)

KEPCOKEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School(KINGS)- Master’s /Doctoral Courses

KINS(Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety)International Nuclear Safety School(INSS)

KHNPKHNP Nuclear Power Education InstituteNuclear Site Training Center (4facilities)

[Institute / Academy] [Utility/Industry/Association]

23

Universities14 Universities with Nuclear related Dept.5 Universities with Energy related Dept.45 Universities with Radiology Dept.11 Research Institutes

KINAC(Korea Institute of Nuclear Non-proliferation & Control) International Nuclear Non-proliferation & Security Academy(INSA)

KNA (Korea Nuclear Association for International Cooperation)Human Resource Development Center

KPS (Korea Plant Service & Engineering Co.)

Nuclear Maintenance Training Center

KINS(Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety)International Nuclear Safety School(INSS)

KHNPKHNP Nuclear Power Education InstituteNuclear Site Training Center (4facilities)

Effective Education

System in Place

Other Advanced & Optimized Process•Steel Deck Plate Method•Automatic Welding of RC Loop•Concurrent Installation of RC Loop Pipe & RV Internals

•Shortened Post-tensioning Period•3D CAD Models for Construction•4D Simulation, etc.

Pre-fabrication & Modularization•Reinforcing Bar of Basement•RCB Exterior Wall 3-tiered CLP Module•MSIV Room Piping & Valve•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel, etc.•Installing 1or2 Pieces-dome Liner Plate•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel

Reducing

Construction Period

Personnel needed

Other Advanced & Optimized Process•Steel Deck Plate Method•Automatic Welding of RC Loop•Concurrent Installation of RC Loop Pipe & RV Internals

•Shortened Post-tensioning Period•3D CAD Models for Construction•4D Simulation, etc.

Pre-fabrication & Modularization•Reinforcing Bar of Basement•RCB Exterior Wall 3-tiered CLP Module•MSIV Room Piping & Valve•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel, etc.•Installing 1or2 Pieces-dome Liner Plate•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel

Reducing

Construction Period

Personnel needed

24

Government MinistriesGovernment Ministries(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)

Material Program(IAEA, OECD/NEA)

• Technical Cooperation• Cooperative Research Program•Joint Collaborative Project

Regional Program(RCA, FNCA)

• Nuclear Community for TechnicalExchange in Asia

Bilateral Program(US, Japan, France, etc.)

• Peaceful Usage of Nuclear Power• Exchange of Policy and Technical Issue

Government MinistriesGovernment Ministries(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)

Utility, Industry

Technical Exchange Program(WANO, INPO)

• Self-Assessment of Nuclear Industry

• Sharing Operating Experience• Technical Exchange Visit

Exchange of Technical Information

(WNA, NEI, etc.)

• Exchange of the Technical Information• Participating in Meetings/ Workshop

Benchmarking Training, etc.(Other Countries, Organizations)

• Contribution to NPP developmentthrough training, technical visit, etc.

• University• R & D• Reg. body• Utilities

25[Regional & International Arrangement in Korea]

26

Korea has achieved comprehensive nuclear infrastructure for efficient construction & safe operation

through steady nuclear expansion

Korean nuclear infrastructure is adequate when assessed by INPRO Methodology, which results from;

§ Strong commitment from the Korean Government§ Continuing NPP construction§ Consistent R&D

27

UR2. Industrial& Economic

UR4. Human

Resources

UR3. Political

Support & Public

Acceptance

UR5. Minimization of Infrastructure

UR6. Regional &

InternationalArrangement

UR1. Legal & Institutional

Korean nuclear infrastructure is adequate when assessed by INPRO Methodology, which results from;

§ Strong commitment from the Korean Government§ Continuing NPP construction§ Consistent R&D

28

Documents

14 INPRO Infrastructure Presentation Final3(슬라이드 노트 KEPCO