Upload
emilia-brito
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
1/46
11
Capacity AnalysisCapacity AnalysisCE 453 Lecture #15CE 453 Lecture #15
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
2/46
22
ObjectivesObjectives
Review LOS definition and determinantsReview LOS definition and determinants
Define capacity and relate to idealDefine capacity and relate to idealcapacitiescapacities
Review calculating capacity using HCMReview calculating capacity using HCMprocedures for basic freeway sectionprocedures for basic freeway section
Focus on relations between capacity, levelFocus on relations between capacity, level--
ofof--service, and designservice, and design
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
3/46
33
Level of Service (LOS)Level of Service (LOS)
ConceptConcept a qualitative measure describinga qualitative measure describingoperational conditions within a traffic streamoperational conditions within a traffic streamand their perception by drivers and/orand their perception by drivers and/or
passengerspassengersLevels represent range of operatingLevels represent range of operatingconditions defined by measures ofconditions defined by measures ofeffectiveness (MOE)effectiveness (MOE)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
4/46
44
LOS A (Freeway)LOS A (Freeway)
Free flow conditionsFree flow conditions
Vehicles areVehicles are
unimpeded in theirunimpeded in theirability to maneuverability to maneuverwithin the trafficwithin the trafficstreamstream
Incidents andIncidents andbreakdowns arebreakdowns areeasily absorbedeasily absorbed
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
5/46
55
LOS BLOS BFlow reasonably freeFlow reasonably freeAbility to maneuverAbility to maneuveris slightly restrictedis slightly restrictedGeneral level ofGeneral level of
physical andphysical andpsychologicalpsychologicalcomfort provided tocomfort provided todrivers is highdrivers is high
Effects of incidentsEffects of incidentsand breakdowns areand breakdowns areeasily absorbedeasily absorbed
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
6/46
66
LOS CLOS CFlow at or near FFSFlow at or near FFSFreedom to maneuverFreedom to maneuveris noticeablyis noticeablyrestrictedrestrictedLane changes moreLane changes moredifficultdifficultMinor incidents willMinor incidents willbe absorbed, but willbe absorbed, but willcause deteriorationcause deteriorationin servicein serviceQueues may formQueues may formbehind significantbehind significantblockageblockage
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
7/46
77
LOS DLOS DSpeeds begin toSpeeds begin to
decline withdecline withincreasing flowincreasing flowFreedom to maneuverFreedom to maneuveris noticeably limitedis noticeably limited
Drivers experienceDrivers experiencephysical andphysical andpsychologicalpsychologicaldiscomfortdiscomfort
Even minor incidentsEven minor incidentscause queuing, trafficcause queuing, trafficstream cannot absorbstream cannot absorbdisruptionsdisruptions
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
8/46
88
LOS ELOS E
CapacityCapacity
Operations are volatile,Operations are volatile,virtually no usable gapsvirtually no usable gapsVehicles are closelyVehicles are closelyspacedspaced
Disruptions such as laneDisruptions such as lanechanges can cause achanges can cause adisruption wave thatdisruption wave thatpropagates throughoutpropagates throughout
the upstream trafficthe upstream trafficflowflowCannot dissipate evenCannot dissipate evenminor disruptions,minor disruptions,incidents will causeincidents will causebreakdownbreakdown
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
9/46
99
LOS FLOS F
Breakdown or forcedBreakdown or forcedflowflow
Occurs when:Occurs when: Traffic incidentsTraffic incidents
cause a temporarycause a temporaryreduction in capacityreduction in capacity
At points ofAt points ofrecurring congestion,recurring congestion,such as merge orsuch as merge orweaving segmentsweaving segments
In forecastIn forecastsituations, projectedsituations, projectedflow (demand)flow (demand)exceeds estimatedexceeds estimated
capacitycapacity
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
10/46
1010
Design Level of ServiceDesign Level of Service
This is the desired quality of traffic conditionsThis is the desired quality of traffic conditionsfrom a drivers perspective (used to determinefrom a drivers perspective (used to determinenumber of lanes)number of lanes)
Design LOS is higher for higher functionalDesign LOS is higher for higher functionalclassesclasses
Design LOS is higher for rural areasDesign LOS is higher for rural areas LOS is higher for level/rolling thanLOS is higher for level/rolling than
mountainous terrainmountainous terrain Other factors include: adjacent land use typeOther factors include: adjacent land use typeand development intensity, environmentaland development intensity, environmental
factors, and aesthetic and historic valuesfactors, and aesthetic and historic values Design all elements to same LOS (use HCM toDesign all elements to same LOS (use HCM to
analyze)analyze)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
11/46
1111
Design Level of ServiceDesign Level of Service
(LOS)(LOS)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
12/46
1212
CapacityCapacity DefinedDefinedCapacity: MaximumCapacity: Maximum hourly ratehourly rate ofofvehiclesvehicles or personsor personsthat canthat can reasonably bereasonably beexpectedexpected to pass a point,to pass a point, or traverse aor traverse a
uniform section of lane or roadwayuniform section of lane or roadway,,during a specified time periodduring a specified time period underunderprevailing conditionsprevailing conditions (traffic and roadway)(traffic and roadway)
Different for different facilitiesDifferent for different facilities
(freeway, multilane, 2(freeway, multilane, 2--lane rural, signals)lane rural, signals)Why would it be different?Why would it be different?
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
13/46
1313
Ideal CapacityIdeal Capacity
Freeways: CapacityFreeways: Capacity(Free(Free--Flow Speed)Flow Speed)
2,400 pcphpl (70 mph)2,400 pcphpl (70 mph)
2,350 pcphpl (65 mph)2,350 pcphpl (65 mph)2,300 pcphpl (60 mph)2,300 pcphpl (60 mph)
2,250 pcphpl (55 mph)2,250 pcphpl (55 mph)
MultilaneMultilaneSuburban/RuralSuburban/Rural
2,200 pcphpl (60 mph)2,200 pcphpl (60 mph)
2,100 (55 mph)2,100 (55 mph)2,000 (50 mph)2,000 (50 mph)
1,900 (45 mph)1,900 (45 mph)
22--lane rurallane rural 2,8002,800pcphpcph
SignalSignal 1,900 pcphgpl1,900 pcphgpl
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
14/46
1414
Principles for AcceptablePrinciples for Acceptable
Degree of Congestion:Degree of Congestion:1.1. Demand
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
15/46
1515
Multilane HighwaysMultilane Highways
Chapter 21 of the Highway Capacity ManualChapter 21 of the Highway Capacity Manual
For rural and suburban multilane highwaysFor rural and suburban multilane highways
Assumptions (Ideal Conditions, all otherAssumptions (Ideal Conditions, all otherconditions reduce capacity):conditions reduce capacity): Only passenger carsOnly passenger cars
No direct access pointsNo direct access points
A divided highwayA divided highway FFS > 60 mphFFS > 60 mph
Represents highest level of multilane rural andRepresents highest level of multilane rural andsuburban highwayssuburban highways
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
16/46
1616
Multilane HighwaysMultilane Highways
Intended for analysis of uninterruptedIntended for analysis of uninterrupted--flow highway segmentsflow highway segments
Signal spacing >2
.0 milesSignal spacing >2
.0 miles No onNo on--street parkingstreet parking
No significant bus stopsNo significant bus stops
No significant pedestrian activitiesNo significant pedestrian activities
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
17/46
1717
Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
18/46
1818Source: HCM, 2000
Step 1: Gather data
Step 2: Calculate capacity
(Supply)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
19/46
1919Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
20/46
2020
Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
21/46
2121
Source: HCM, 2000
Lane WidthLane Width
Base Conditions: 12 foot lanesBase Conditions: 12 foot lanes
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
22/46
2222
Source: HCM, 2000
Lane Width (Example)Lane Width (Example)
How much does use of 10-foot lanes decreasefree flow speed?
Flw = 6.6 mph
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
23/46
2323
Lateral ClearanceLateral Clearance
Distance to fixed objectsDistance to fixed objects
AssumesAssumes
>= 6 feet from right edge of travel lanes to>= 6 feet from right edge of travel lanes toobstructionobstruction
>= 6 feet from left edge of travel lane to>= 6 feet from left edge of travel lane toobject in medianobject in median
Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
24/46
2424
Lateral ClearanceLateral Clearance
TLC = LCTLC = LCRR + LC+ LCLL
TLC = total lateral clearance in feetTLC = total lateral clearance in feet
LCLCRR = lateral clearance from right edge of= lateral clearance from right edge oftravel lanetravel lane
LCLCLL= lateral clearance from left edge of= lateral clearance from left edge of
travel lanetravel lane
Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
25/46
2525
Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
26/46
2626
Example: Calculate lateral clearance adjustment for a 4-lane
divided highway with milepost markers located 4 feet to the
right of the travel lane.
TLC = LCR+ LCL = 6 + 4 = 10
Flc = 0.4 mph Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
27/46
2727
fm: Accounts for friction between opposing directions of
traffic in adjacent lanes for undivided
No adjustment for divided, fm = 1
Source: HCM, 2000
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
28/46
2828
Fa accounts for interruption due to access points along
the facility
Example: if there are 20 access points per mile, what is
the reduction in free flow speed?
Fa
= 5.0 mph
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
29/46
2929
Estimate Free flow SpeedEstimate Free flow Speed
BFFS = free flow under ideal conditions
FFS = free flow adjusted for actual conditions
From previous examples:
FFS = 60 mph 6.6 mph - 0.4 mph 0 5.0 mph =
48 mph ( reduction of 12 mph)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
30/46
3030
Source: HCM, 2000
Step 3: Estimate
demand
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
31/46
3131
Calculate Flow Rate
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
32/46
3232
Heavy Vehicle AdjustmentHeavy Vehicle Adjustment
Heavy vehicles affect trafficHeavy vehicles affect trafficSlower, largerSlower, largerffhvhv increases number of passenger vehicles toincreases number of passenger vehicles to
account for presence of heavy trucksaccount for presence of heavy trucks
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
33/46
3333
f(hv) General Grade Definitions:f(hv) General Grade Definitions:
Level: combination of alignment (horizontal andLevel: combination of alignment (horizontal andvertical) that allows heavy vehicles to maintainvertical) that allows heavy vehicles to maintainsame speed as pass. cars (includes short gradessame speed as pass. cars (includes short grades2% or less)2% or less)
Rolling: combination that causes heavy vehiclesRolling: combination that causes heavy vehiclesto reduce speed substantially below P.C. (but notto reduce speed substantially below P.C. (but notcrawl speed for any length)crawl speed for any length)
Mountainous: Heavy vehicles at crawl speed forMountainous: Heavy vehicles at crawl speed for
significant length or frequent intervalssignificant length or frequent intervals Use specific grade approach if grade less thanUse specific grade approach if grade less than
3% is more than mile or grade more than 3% is3% is more than mile or grade more than 3% ismore than mile)more than mile)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
34/46
3434
Example: for 10% heavy trucks on rollingterrain, what is Fhv?
For rolling terrain, ET = 2.5
Fhv = _________1_______ = 0.87
1 + 0.1 (2.5 1)
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
35/46
3535
Driver Population Factor (fDriver Population Factor (fpp))
NonNon--familiar users affect capacityfamiliar users affect capacity
ffpp = 1, familiar users= 1, familiar users
1 > f1 > fpp >=0.85, unfamiliar users>=0.85, unfamiliar users
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
36/46
3636
Source: HCM, 2000
Step 4: Determine
LOS
Demand Vs.
Supply
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
37/46
3737
Calculate vCalculate vpp
Example:Example: base volume is 2,500 veh/hourbase volume is 2,500 veh/hour
PHF = 0.9, N = 2PHF = 0.9, N = 2ffhvhv from previous, ffrom previous, fhvhv = 0.87= 0.87
NonNon--familiar users, ffamiliar users, fpp = 0.85= 0.85
vp = _____2,500 vph_____ = 1878 pc/ph/pl
0.9 x 2 x 0.87 x 0.85
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
38/46
3838
Calculate DensityCalculate Density
Example: for previous
D = _____1878 vph ____ =39.1 pc/mi/lane
48 mph
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
39/46
3939
LOS = E
Also, D = 39
.1 pc/mi/ln, LOS E
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
40/46
4040
Design DecisionDesign Decision
What can we change in a design toWhat can we change in a design toprovide an acceptable LOS?provide an acceptable LOS?
Lateral clearance (only 0.4 mph)Lateral clearance (only 0.4 mph)Lane widthLane width
Number of lanesNumber of lanes
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
41/46
4141
Source: HCM, 2000
Lane Width (Example)Lane Width (Example)
How much does use of 10 foot lanes decrease freeflow speed?
Flw = 6.6 mph
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
42/46
4242
Recalculate DensityRecalculate Density
Example: for previous (but with wider lanes)
D = _____1878 vph ____ =34.1 pc/mi/lane
55 mph
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
43/46
4343
LOS = E
Now D = 34.1 pc/mi/ln, on border of LOS E
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
44/46
4444
Recalculate vRecalculate vpp, while adding a lane, while adding a lane
Example:Example: base volume is 2,500 veh/hourbase volume is 2,500 veh/hour
PHF = 0.9, N = 3PHF = 0.9, N = 3ffhvhv from previous, ffrom previous, fhvhv = 0.87= 0.87
NonNon--familiar users, ffamiliar users, fpp = 0.85= 0.85
vp = _____2,500 vph_____ = 1252 pc/ph/pl
0.9 x 3 x 0.87 x 0.85
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
45/46
4545
Calculate DensityCalculate Density
Example: for previous
D = _____1252 vph ____ =26.1 pc/mi/lane
48 mph
8/8/2019 14 Capacity Analysis
46/46
4646
LOS = D
Now D = 26 1 pc/mi/ln LOS D (almost C)