12th Symposium BoundaryLayers - GBV · 2008. 7. 15. · NCAR,BoulderCO;andC.J. Grund, S. D. Mayor, andW.M.Angevine 9 1.5 REMOTE MEASUREMENT OF VERTICAL TURBULENT TRANSPORT OF OZONE

12th Symposium on

BoundaryLayersand Turbulence

July28-AugUSt h 1997 Vancouver, BC, Canada

Sponsored by

American Meteorological Society

cosponsored by

Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society

Front Cover: 2030 UTC 15 August 1996 comparisons of horizontal cross-sections of (a) DOW1 radial

velocities (m s 1), (b) radar reflectivities (dBZ,,), (c) HRDL radial velocities (m sA) and (d) vertical cross-section

of HRDL radial velocities (m s "1). Range rings in (a) and (b) are every 5 km and are every 1 km in (c). Tic

marks in (d) are every 400 m in the horizontal and every 100 m in the vertical. Blue line in (c) indicates

location of vertical cross-section shown in (d). Missing data in (a) and (b) are due to ground clutter. Please

see paper P1.6 (page 22), LINEARLY-ORGANIZED COHERENT STRUCTURES IN THE SURFACE LAYER

by Tammy M. Weckwerth, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and C. J. Grund and S. D. Mayor, for a complete description.

UNIVERSITATSBIBLIOTHEKHANNOVER

TECHNISCHEINF0RMATI0NSBIBLIOTHEK

\»m^nm>fcJI «i i

All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means - graphic, electronic, ormechanical,including photocopying, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems -without the prior written permission of the publisher. Contact AMSfor permission pertaining to the overall collection. Authors retain their individual rights and should be contacted directly for permission to use their

material separately. The manuscripts reproduced herein are unrefereed papers presented at the 12th Symposium on Boundary layers and

Turbulence. Their appearance in this collection does not constitute formal publication.UB/TIB Hannover 89 I

117 217 026

American Meteorological Society

45 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts USA 02108-3693j

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulencepage

Hi FOREWORD

xxix AUTHOR INDEX

SESSION 1: FLATLAND/LIFT FIELD PROGRAMS

I 1.1 THE FLATLAND BOUNDARY LAYER EXPERIMENTS—OVERVIEW. Wayne M. Angevine,Cooperative Inst, for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)/Univ. of Colorado and NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAAVAeronomy Lab. (AL), Boulder, CO; and A. W.Grimsdell, J. M. Warnock, W. L. Clark, and A. C. Delany

3 1.2 BOUNDARY LAYER MEASUREMENT DURING THE FLATLAND BOUNDARY LAYER EXPERI¬MENTS. Alison W. Grimsdell, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and NOAA/AL, Boulder, CO; and W. M.Angevine

5 1.3 LIDARS IN FLAT TERRAIN (LIFT) PROJECT OVERVIEW. Shane D. Mayor, National Ctr. forAtmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder CO; and S. A. Cohn, T. M. Weckwerth, D. H. Lenschow, C.J. Grund, C. J. Senff, R. M. Banta, and R. M. Hardesty

7 1.4 BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHT AND VERTICAL VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS AT LIFT. S. A. Cohn,NCAR, Boulder CO; and C. J. Grund, S. D. Mayor, and W. M. Angevine

9 1.5 REMOTE MEASUREMENT OF VERTICAL TURBULENT TRANSPORT OF OZONE IN THE

CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER DURING LIFT USING AN OZONE DIAL/DOPPLER LIDARCOMBINATION. Christoph J. Senff, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and NOAA/Environmental ResearchLab. (ERLVEnvironmental Technology Lab. (ETL), Boulder, CO; and C. J. Grund, S. D. Mayor, Y.Zhao, and R. D. Marchbanks

II 1.6 ESTIMATION OF TKE AND MOMENTUM FLUX PROFILES FROM DOPPLER LIDAR SCANS

DURING LIFT. R. M. Banta, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and B. W. Orr, C. J. Grund, D. H.

Levinson, A. S. Frisch, and S. D. Mayor

POSTER SESSION P1: FLATLAND/LIFT FIELD PROGRAMS

13 P1.1 NOCTURNALAND TRANSITIONAL BOUNDARY LAYERS OBSERVED BYTHE HIGH RESOLUTIONDOPPLER LIDAR DURING THE LIFT EXPERIMENT. Christian J. Grund, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder,CO

15 P1.2 THE HIGH RESOLUTION DOPPLER LIDAR: ANEW TOOL FOR BOUNDARY LAYER RESEARCH.

Christian J. Grund, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and R. M. Banta, S. A. Cohn, C. L Frush, J. L.

George, K. R. Healy, J. N. Howell, S. D. Mayor, R. A. Richter, and A. M. Weickmann

17 P1.3 ENTRAPMENT RESULTS FROMTHE FLATLAND BOUNDARY LAYER EXPERIMENTS. WayneM. Angevine, CIRESAJniv. of Colorado and NOAA/AL, Boulder, CO; and A. W. Grimsdell, S. A.

McKeen, and J. M. Warnock

19 P1.4 VERTICALVELOCITY STATISTICS IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER MEASURED BYTHE

NOAA/ERL/ETL HIGH RESOLUTION DOPPLER LIDAR. Shane D. Mayor, NCAR, Boulder CO; and

S. A. Cohn, D. H. Lenschow, C. J. Grund, and R. M. Banta

21 P1.5 ON THE ESTIMATION OF CBL MIXING HEIGHT FROM SURFACE FLUX AND TURBULENCE

MEASUREMENTS. Robert M. Banta, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO

22 P1.6 LINEARLY-ORGANIZED COHERENT STRUCTURES IN THE SURFACE LAYER. Tammy M.

Weckwerth, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and C. J. Grund and S. D. Mayor

*

Manuscript notavailable v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12TH SYMPOSIUM ON BOUNDARY LAYERS AND TURBULENCE

PAGE

SESSION 2: CONVECTIVE MIXED LAYER & ENTRAPMENT

* 2.1 STUDY OF WIND PROFILE IN BAROCLINIC CBL Margaret LeMone, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and M.

Zhou, C.-H. Moeng, D. H. Lenschow, and R. Grossman

24 2.2 A COMPARISON BETWEEN PTV AND LES IN A CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Frans T. M.

Nieuwstadt, Delft Univ. of Tech, Delft, The Netherlands; and M. Firmani and G. P. Romano

2.3 LIDAR STUDIES OF ENTRAINMENT. Kenneth J. Davis, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN; and C.

Kiemle, D. H. Lenschow, and G. Ehret

26 2.4 OBSERVATIONS OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER AND THE

OVERLYING ATMOSPHERE. I. R. Paluch, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and D. H. Lenschow, C. Kiemle, G.

Ehret, A. Giez, and K. J. Davis

28 2.5 SCALING SCALAR STATISTICS UNDER DIFFERENT ENTRAINMENT REGIMES. Berenice I.

Michels, Wageningen Agricultural Univ., Wageningen, The Netherlands; and H. A. R. De Bruin

30 2.6 STUDY OF THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER AT DUMONT d'URVILLE, EAST ANTARCTICA

USING SODAR AND TETHERED BALLOON DATA. Stefania Argentini, Istituto Fisica Atmosfera

(IFA), CNR, Frascati, Italy; and G. Mastrantonio and A. Viola

POSTER SESSION P2: CONVECTIVE ML & ENTRAINMENT

32 P2.1 THE TRANSITION FROM FORCED TO FREE CONVECTION. Edgar L Andreas, U.S. Army Cold

Regions and Engineering Lab., Hanover, NH; and B. A. Cash

34 P2.2 BOUNDARY LAYER EVOLUTION IN RESPONSE TO VARIATIONS OF SEA SURFACE

TEMPERATURE AND WIND SHEAR. Qing Wang, Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), Monterey, CA;

and L. Pan

36 P2.3 BUOYANT CONVECTION FROM FREEZING LEADS. Afshan Alam, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO;

and J. A. Curry

38 P2.4 HORIZONTAL VARIATION IN MIXING DEPTH OBSERVED DURING THE 1995 SOUTHERN

OXIDANTS STUDY. Allen B. White, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO

40 P2.5 A GENERAL MODEL FOR TWO-POINT, SECOND-ORDER, TURBULENT VELOCITY STATISTICS

IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. D. Keith Wilson, U.S. Army Research Lab., Adelphi, MD

42 P2.6 DOPPLER RADARMEASUREMENTS OF VERTICAL VELOCITY STATISTICS ABOVE A BOREAL

FOREST. A. S. Frisch, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and D. H. Lenschow, B. E. Mariner, B. W. Orr,

and D. R. Fitzjarrald

44 P2.7 TURBULENCE STRUCTURE OF THE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER DURING THE

SEMAPHORE EXPERIMENT. D. Lambert, Lab. d'Aerologie, CNRS, Toulouse, France; and P.

Durand, B. Benech, A. Druilhet, and A. Rechou

46 P2.8 A COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED AND MODELLED MIXING HEIGHTS. Martin Piringer, Central Inst,

for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna, Austria; and K. Baumann and M. Langer

48 P2.9 ENTRAINMENT ZONE DEPTH ESTIMATION IN A SHALLOW CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER

BASED ON SODAR DATA. Frank Beyrich, Brandenburgische Technische Univ., Cottbus, Germany;and S.-E. Gryning

50 P2.10 STUDY OF EXCHANGE PROCESSESAT THE TOP OF THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER.

J. L. Attie, Lab. d'Aerologie, CNRS, Toulouse, France; and A. Druilhet, P. Durand, and F. Said

*

Manuscript not available vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

page

52 p2.11 comparison of the entrainment flux at the top of the unstable marine

boundary-layer at the micro- and the mesoscale as parametrized using lidarOBSERVATIONS. Cyrille Flamant, CNRS, Paris, France; and J. Pelon

54 P2.12 ENTRAINMENT AND NONLOCAL MIXING IN ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYERS. D. H. P.

Vogelezang, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Inst. (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands; and A. A. M.

Holtslag

SESSION 3: CLOUDY BOUNDARY LAYERS

56 3.1 DECOUPLING OF SUBTROPICAL STRATOCUMULUS-TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYERS AS THEY

WARM AND DEEPEN. Christopher S. Bretherton, Univ. of Washington, Seattle WA; and M. C. Wyant

58 3.2 DRIZZLE, "DECOUPLING" AND AEROSOLINDIRECT EFFECTS IN MARINE STRATOCUMULUS.

Bjorn Stevens, NCAR, Boulder CO; and W. R. Cotton, G. Feingold, and C.-H. Moeng

60 3.3 TURBULENCE TRANSFER AND NON-LOCAL MIXING PROCESSES IN THE CLOUDY MARINE

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Darko Koracin, Desert Research Inst. (DRI), Reno, NV; and

M. Tjernstrom and G. Svensson

62 3.4 DRIZZLE IN THE STRATOCUMULUS-CAPPED BOUNDARY LAYER AS VIEWED BY RADAR,

RADIOMETER AND LIDAR. Graham Feingold, Cooperative Inst, for Research in the Atmosphere

(CIRA)/Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins and NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and A. S. Frisch, B.

Stevens, and W. R. Cotton

64 3.5 A GENERALIZED MODEL OF STRATOCUMULUS AND SHALLOW CUMULUS CLOUDS IN

SUBTROPICAL MARINE BOUNDARY LAYERS. Shouping Wang, Univ. Space Research Association

(USRA), Huntsville, AL; and F. Robertson

66 3.6 STRUCTURE OF A CONTINENTAL STRATOCUMULUS-TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYER OBSERVED

BY AIRCRAFT AND CLOUD RADAR. Steven K. Krueger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and S.

M. Lazarus, G. G. Mace, and K. Sassen

POSTER SESSION P3: CLOUDY BOUNDARY LAYERS

68 P3.1 EFFECTS OF CLOUD-TOP RADIATIVE COOLING ON DROP GROWTH IN STRATOCUMULUS

CLOUDS. Yefim L. Kogan, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and Q. Liu

70 P3.2 FOREST-ATMOSPHERE INTERACTIONS AND BOUNDARY LAYER CUMULUS. Jeffrey M.

Freedman, Univ. at Albany, State Univ. of New York (SUNY), Albany, NY; and R. K. Sakai, D. R.

Fitzjarrald, and K. E. Moore

72 P3.3 THE APPLICATION OF A "CONVENTIONAL" TWO-DIMENSIONAL CLOUD MODEL TO MARINE

BOUNDARY LAYER CLOUDS. Fred J. Kopp, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid

City, SD; and H. D. Orville

* P3.4 MOTION AND INTERACTION OF CLOUD HYDROMETEORS IN TURBULENT ATMOSPHERE AND

THE FORMATION OF CLOUD FINE STRUCTURE. Mark Pinsky, The Herbrew Univ. of Jerusalem,

Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel; and A. Khain

P3.5 A NONLOCAL CLOSURE TURBULENCE MODEL OF THE STRATOCUMULUS CLOUD-TOPPED

BOUNDARY LAYER. Yinong Wang, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and P. Austin

74 P3.6 CLOUD-RESOLVING SIMULATIONS OF ARCTIC STRATUS. J. Y. Harrington, Colorado State Univ.,

Ft. Collins, CO; and G. Feingold, W. R. Cotton, and S. M. Kreidenweis

76 P3.7 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CLOUD TYPE AND BOUNDARY LAYER STRUCTURE OVER THE

OCEAN. Joel R. Norris, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA

*

Manuscript not available vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PAGE

P3.8 PAPER WITHDRAWN

78 P3.9 CLOUD TOP ENTRAINMENT INSTABILITY IN A PROGNOSTIC CLOUD SCHEME FOR LARGE

SCALE MODELS. Someshwar Das, USRA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

(NASAVGoddard Space Flight Ctr. (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD

80 P3.10 CONVECTIVE REGIMES IN THE MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER: SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF

BOUNDARY LAYER CLOUDS. Goshka Szczodrak, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,

Canada; and P. Austin

82 P3.11 THE VERTICAL INHOMOGENEITYOF STRATOCUMULUS CLOUD MICROSTRUCTURE AND ITS

EFFECT ON CLOUD OPTICAL DEPTH. Zena N. Kogan, Cooperative Inst, for Mesoscale

Meteorological Studies (ClMMS)AJniv. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and Y. L. Kogan

84 P3.12 MICROPHYSICAL IMPACTS ON TRANSITIONAL CLOUDINESS IN THE SUBTROPICAL MARINE

BOUNDARY LAYER. Matthew C. Wyant, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; and C. S. Bremerton

86 P3.13 STRATOCUMULUS RESEARCH PRIOR TO 1968. Bjorn Stevens, NCAR, Boulder, CO

88 P3.14 DYNAMIC EFFECTSOF CLOUD DROPLETNUMBER CONCENTRATION ON CLOUD-TOP ALBEDOIN MARINE BOUNDARY LAYERS: A MODEL SENSITIVITY STUDY. Shouping Wang, USRA,Huntsville, AL

90 P3.15 A COMPARISON BETWEEN STRATUS CLOUD OBSERVATIONS USING A CLOUD DOPPLERRADAR AND THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CLOUD MODEL. A. Shelby Frisch, NOAA/ERL/ETL and

Colorado State Univ., Boulder, CO; and S. K. Krueger

SESSION 4: CLOUD ENTRAINMENT & CLOUDS OVER LAND

92 4.1 INTERFACIAL CONVECTION AND ENTRAINMENT: LABORATORY RESULTS. Bentley J. Sayler,Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA

94 4.2 BOUNDARY-LAYER CLOUDINESS AND CLOUD-TOP ENTRAINMENT INSTABILITY — A NEWSYNTHESIS. Malcolm K. MacVean, UK Met Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK; and C. S. Bretherton

96 4.3 AN ENTRAINMENT RATE PARAMETRIZATION FOR CLEAR AND CLOUDY CONVECTIVEBOUNDARY LAYERS. Adrian P. Lock, UK Met Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK

98 4.4 ENTRAINMENT PARAMETERIZATION IN CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS DERIVED FROMLARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS. Margreet C. vanZanten, Inst, for Marine and Atmospheric ResearchUtrecht (1MAU), Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, The Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke

100 4.5 LES SENSITIVITY STUDY OF CLOUD-TOP ENTRAINMENT. D. C. Lewellen, West Virginia Univ.,Morgantown, WV; and W. S. Lewellen

102 4.6 A SCHEME TO PREDICT POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS OF BOUNDARY-LAYER CUMULUSUSING DISTRIBUTIONS OF TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE. Larry K. Berg, Univ. of BritishColumbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and R. B. Stull

104 4.7 LES ANALYSIS OF THE CONDITIONALLY SAMPLED VERTICAL VELOCITY EQUATION:TOWARDSA PROGNOSTICMASSFLUX APPROACH. Stephan R. de Roode, IMAU, Utrecht Univ.,Utrecht, The Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke

POSTER SESSION P4: CLOUD ENTRAINMENT

106 P4.1 AN INTERCOMPARISON OF RADIATIVELY-DRIVEN ENTRAINMENT AND TURBULENCE IN ASMOKE CLOUD, AS SIMULATED BY DIFFERENT NUMERICAL MODELS. Malcolm K. MacVean,UK Met Office, Bracknell, Berks. UK; and C. S. Bretherton

*

Manuscript not available viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS


p4.2 effects of resolution on the simulation of stratocumulus entrainment. davidE. Stevens, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., Berkeley CA; and C. S. Bretherton

SESSION 5: TURBULENT DISPERSION AND CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATIONS

108 5.1 LAGRANGIAN MODELING OF DISPERSION IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER USING LESVELOCITY FIELDS. J. C. Weil, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and P. P. Sullivan and C. H.

Moeng

110 5.2 A MODEL FOR TURBULENT MIXING OF REACTIVE GASES IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARYLAYER. G. H. L. Verver, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands; and H. van Dop and A. A. M. Holtslag

5.3 PAPER WITHDRAWN

112 5.4 A SIMPLE APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING SHORT-TERM PEAK CONCENTRATIONS WITH

TIME-AVERAGED MODELS. Holly Peterson, Montana Tech of the Univ. of Montana, Butte, MT; and

S. O'Neill and B. Lamb

114 5.5 COMPARISON OF REFLECTION BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR LANGEVIN EQUATIONMODELING OF CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER DISPERSION. John S. Nasstrom, Lawrence

Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore CA; and D. L. Ermak

116 5.6 TRAJECTORY CURVATURE AS A CRITERION FOR LAGRANGIAN STOCHASTIC MODELS. John

D. Wilson, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; and T. K. Flesch

118 5.7 ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER - FREE TROPOSPHERE EXCHANGE OVER COMPLEXTERRAIN AND ITS INFLUENCEON REGIONAL BUDGETSOF AIR POLLUTANTS. Michael Lehning.Swiss Federal Inst, of Tech., Zurich, Switzerland; and H. Richner and G. L. Kok

POSTER SESSION P5: DISPERSION


120 P5.2 COMPARISON OF MEASURED CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATIONS TO DATA FROM A

MEANDERING DIFFUSION MODEL. Tina Donovan, Montana Tech. of the Univ. of Montana, Butte,MT; and H. Peterson

122 P5.3 AN INVESTIGATION OF PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATION

DATA. Charles Mazzone, Montana Tech of the Univ. of Montana, Butte, MT; and H. Peterson

P5.4 EFFECT OF ATMOSPHERIC STABILITYON SURFACE LEVEL CONCENTRATION IN A REGIONAL

SCALE AIR QUALITY MODEL. Xiaohong Xu, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and X. Yand and D.

R. Miller


124 P5.6 VISUALIZATION OF MADONA DATA BASE AND SIMPLE MODEL VALIDATIONS. Harald Weber,

GMGO, Traben-Trarbach, Germany; and R. M. Cionco

126 P5.7 GRAPHICAL INTERFACE FOR COMPARISONWITH DATA FROM MADONA. Welf aufm Kampe,GMGO, Traben-Trarbach, Germany; and H. Weber and H. E. Jorgensen

SESSION 6: STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER

128 6.1 THE TURBULENCE REGIME OF A VERY STABLE MARINE AIRFLOW WITH QUASI-FRICTIONAL

DECOUPLING. Ulf Hoegstroem, Univ. of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; and A.-S. Smedman

*

Manuscript not available ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAQE

130 6.2

6.3

132 6.3A


vertical structure of autumal mixed-phase cloudy boundary layers over the

ARCTIC ICE PACK. James O. Pinto, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and J. A. Curry

PAPER WITHDRAWN

NEW OBSERVATIONS OF THE CLIMATOLOGY AND STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT PLAINS

LOW-LEVEL JET. C. David Whiteman, Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA; and

X. Bian and S. S. Zhong (formerly P6.1)

134 6.4 TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER OVER A MID-LATITUDE

GLACIER. PART I: A COMBINATION OF KATABATIC AND LARGE SCALE FORCING CONDITIONS.

C. J. P. P. Smeets, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke and H. F.

Vugts

136 6.5 TURBULENCE IN THE STABLY STRATIFIED MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER OBSERVED DURING

THE COASTALWAVES EXPERIMENT 1996. Linda Strom, Scripps Inst, of Oceanography (SIO), La

Jolla, CA; and D. P. Rogers and I. M. Brooks

138 6.6 SPECTRAL GAPS AT LENGTH SCALES OF 10 M IN A STRONGLY SHEARED GROUND-BASED

INVERSION. Jens Bange, Universitat of Hannover, Hannover, Germany; and A. Muschinski and R.

Roth

POSTER SESSION P6: STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER

P6.1 PAPER MOVED TO 6.3A

140 P6.2 THE LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF STABLY STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER

USING THE NONLINEAR SUBGRID MODEL. Branko Kosovic, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and

J. A. Curry

142 P6.3 THE EFFECT OF STABLE STRATIFICATION ON THE DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL

REACTIONS IN THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER. Stefano Galmarini, Joint Research Ctr., Ispra,Italy; and P. G. Duynkerke and J. Vial-Guerau de Arellano

144 P6.4 INVESTIGATION OF DECOUPLING OVER A VALLEY IN THE NOCTURNAL STABLE BOUNDARY

LAYER. John J. Holden, Univ. of Reading, Reading, Berks., UK; and S. E. Belcher and S. H.

Derbyshire

146 P6.5 THE ROLE OF GRAVITY WAVES IN NOCTURNAL BOUNDARY LAYER VARIABILITY. Gregory S.

Poulos, Colorado Research Associates, Boulder, CO

148 P6.6 MODELING OFTHE ARCTIC BOUNDARY LAYER: COMPARISONS WITH MEASUREMENTS FROM

THE ARCTIC OCEAN EXPEDITION 1996. D. O. ReVelle, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los

Alamos, NM; and E. D. Nilsson and M. Kulmala

150 P6.7 ON PREDICTING THE TRANSITION TO TURBULENCE IN STABLY STRATIFIED FLUIDS. D. O.

ReVelle, LANL, Los Alamos, NM

152 P6.8 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SHEAR-INDUCED TURBULENCE IN THE NOCTURNAL RESIDUAL

LAYER. Frank R. Freedman, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA; and R. D. Bornstein

154 P6.9 MEASUREMENTS OF MOMENTUM AND HEAT FLUX DIVERGENCES ASSOCIATED WITH THEGREAT PLAINS LOW-LEVEL JET USING AN INSTRUMENTED AIRCRAFT. Richard D. Clark,Millersville Univ., Millersville, PA; and M. L. McDermott

156 P6.10 SURFACE ENERGY BUDGETOVER THE CENTRAL ARCTIC OCEAN IN SUMMER. E. D. Nilsson,Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Sweden; and U. Rannik and M. Hakansson

Manuscript not available x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE


158 P6.11 VERY STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER DISLOCATIONS AND LAYERING. Philip S. Anderson, British

Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK

160 P6.12 LAYERED STRUCTURE IN THE STABLE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Victoria J. Hipkin,Univ. of Leeds, Leeds, UK; and P. S. Anderson and S. D. Mobbs

162 P6.13 EFFECTS OFMOLECULAR D1FFUSIVITY ON MIXING IN A STRATIFIED FLUID: EXPERIMENT AND

TIME SCALE ANALYSIS. Chris R. Rehmann, Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA; and J. R. Koseff

164 P6.14 CLASSIFICATION OF UNDULAR BORE/GRAVITY WAVES IN THE HIGH PLAINS OF THE UNITED

STATES. Jim Johnson, NOAA/National Weather Service (NWS), Dodge City, KS

166 P6.15 SIMILARITY IN A CONTINUOUSLYSTABLE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER. Jann Forrer, Swiss

Federal Inst, of Tech., Zurich, Switzerland; and M. W. Rotach

168 P6.16 DRAG COEFFICIENTS AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS IN STABLE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER

FLOW. Louis Berkofsky, Ben-Gurion Univ., Jerusalem, Israel

SESSION 7: COHERENT STRUCTURES & NONLOCAL METHODS

170 7.1 A NONLOCAL OCEAN MIXED LAYER PARAMETERIZATION BASED ON A DETRAINING PARCEL

APPROACH. Eric D. Skyllingstad, PNNL, Sequim, WA; and T. Paluszkiewicz

172 7.2 NON-LOCAL MIXING OF MOMENTUM IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Andrew R.

Brown, UK Met Office, Bracknell, Berks., UK; and A. L. M. Grant

174 7.3 THREE DIMENSIONAL BUOYANCY- AND SHEAR-INDUCED LOCAL STRUCTURE OF THE

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER. Samir Khanna, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and J.

G. Brasseur

176 7.4 RESPECTIVE CONTRIBUTION OF TURBULENCE AND COHERENT STRUCTURES IN THE

VERTICAL TRANSFER OF MASS AND ENERGYWITHIN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER.

F. Lohou, Lab. d'Aerologie, Ctr. National de Recherches Meteorologiques (CNRM), Toulouse, France;

and B. Campistron, A. Druilhet, P. Durand, and J.-L. Redelsperger

178 7.5 ENERGY AND SCALE OF COHERENT STRUCTURES IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER.

Patrick Samuelsson, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden

180 7.6 MODELLING AND EVALUATION OF SCALAR FLUXES IN CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS. J.

W. M. Cuijpers, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, The Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke and A. A. M. Holtslag

POSTER SESSION P7: COHERENT STRUCTURES & NONLOCAL METHODS

182 P7.1 KILOMETER-SCALE PATTERNS ON SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY OF THE SEA

SURFACE CAUSED BY MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER CONVECTIVE EDDIES.

Hampton N. Shirer, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and D. J. Beberwyk, B. A. Lambert, Jr., L.

V. Zuccarello, R. Wells, and T. D. Sikora

P7.2 OBSERVATIONS OF THE SIGNATURES OF ATMOSPHERIC COHERENT STRUCTURES ON THE

OCEAN SURFACE BY SAR IMAGERY AND BY AIRCRAFT MEASUREMENTS. Bernard A. Walter,

Northwest Research Associates, Bellevue, WA; and C. A. Vogel and T. Crawford

184 P7.3 THE STUDY OF COHERENT STRUCTURES IN NEUTRALLY STRATIFIED PLANETARY

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOWS OF VARIOUS SURFACE ROUGHNESS. Ching-Long Lin, Univ. of Iowa,

Iowa City, IA; and C.-H. Moeng, P. P. Sullivan, and J. C. McWilliams

* Manuscript not available XI

TABLEOF CONTENTS


page

186 P7.4 DOPPLER RADAR ANALYSES OF ORGANIZED BOUNDARY LAYERS IN CLEAR AIR DURING

TRAC EXPERIMENT. Paulo R. P. Foster, Univ. Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; and B.

Campistron

188 P7.5 IDENTIFICATION OF COHERENT STRUCTURES BY WAVELET ANALYSIS. Xiaoning Gilliam,

Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX; and J. Dunyak, R. E. Peterson, and D. A. Smith

190 P7.6 DETECTING COHERENT STRUCTURES IN WATER VAPOR SERIES OVER A DECIDUOUS

FOREST. Otavio C. Acevedo, SUNY, Albany, NY; and D. R. Fitzjarrald and R. K. Sakai

192 P7.7 A TRANSITION OF COHERENT STRUCTURES WITHIN A CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER.

David A. R. Kristovich, Illinois State Water Survey (ISWS), Champaign, IL; and N. F. Laird, M. R.

Hjelmfelt, and R. G. Derickson

194 P7.8 SIMULATION OF CLOUD STREETS IN A LAKE-EFFECT SNOW EVENT OVER LAKE MICHIGAN.

Russell G. Derickson, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD; and M. R.

Hjelmfelt, D. A. R. Kristovich, and N. F. Laird

196 P7.9 FROZEN PATTERNS OF BOUNDARY LAYER TURBULENCE. George Trevino, MichiganTechnological Univ., Houghton, Ml; and E. L Andreas

198 P7.10 STRUCTURE AND ENERGETICS OF OPTIMAL EKMAN LAYER PERTURBATIONS. Ralph C.

Foster, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA

200 P7.11 TWO- AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL TURBULENCE BUDGETS IN THE PRESENCE OF ROLL-LIKE

STRUCTURES. John W. Glendening, Naval Research Lab. (NRL), Monterey, CA

202 P7.12 SAMPLING OF COHERENT STRUCTURES FROM BURSTS OF DISSIPATION RATE. M. Piper,Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and W. Blumen and N. Gamage

204 P7.13 THE EFFECT OF NONLOCAL DIFFUSION IN NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF MESOSCALE

CIRCULATIONS FORCED BY DIFFERENTIAL HEATING. Raymond W. Arritt, Iowa State Univ.,Ames, IA; and C. J. Anderson

206 P7.14 A NON-LOCAL CLOSURE MODEL OF TURBULENT TRANSPORT IN AND ABOVE TREECANOPIES. Yuguang He, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and X. Yang, D. R. Miller, and D. E. Aylor

SESSION 8: LARGE-EDDY & DIRECT-NUMERICAL SIMULATION

208 8.1 AN ENTRAINMENT-RATE FORMULA FOR BUOYANCY-DRIVEN CLOUD-TOPPED PBL. Chin-Hoh

Moeng, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and P. P. Sullivan and B. Stevens

8.2 REFER TO PAPER 19.5

210 8.2A A THREE-DIMENSIONAL NESTED-GRID LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF THE CONVECTIVE

PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER. David S. DeCroix, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC; and

D. G. Schowalter, Y.-L Lin, S. P. Arya, and F. H. Proctor (formerly P8.3)

8.3 AN EVALUATION OF THE LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OPTION OF THE REGIONAL ATMOS¬

PHERIC MODELING SYSTEM (RAMS) IN SIMULATING A CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER: AFIFE CASE STUDY. Roni Avissar, Cook College - Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ; and E.Eloranta, K. Gurer, and G. Tripoli

212 8.4 NUMERICAL ISSUES IN SIMULATING THE EVOLUTION OF CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS.

Russell G. Derickson, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD; and M. R.

Hjelmfelt, D. A. R. Kristovich, and N. F. Laird

*

Manuscript not available xii

PAGE

table of contents


214 8.5 HIGH-RESOLUTION NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE EQUATORIAL PACIFIC MARINE

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER. Jon M. Reisner, LANL, Los Alamos, NM; and D. I. Cooper andJ. C. Y. Kao

215 8.6 USE OF A DYNAMIC SUBGRID-SCALE MODEL FOR LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF THE

PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER. Richard T. Cederwall, LLNL, Livermore, CA; and R. L. Street

217 8.7 LES OF THE TRANSITION AROUND SUNSET. Frans T. M. Nieuwstadt, Delft Univ. of Technology,Delft, The Netherlands

219 8.8 EXTRACTING QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION ON CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS FROMAEROSOL LIDAR DATA. E. W. Eloranta, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wl

221 8.9 RESOLVABLE- AND SUBGRID-SCALE MEASUREMENT IN THE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE

LAYER. Chenning Tong, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and J. C. Wyngaard, S. Khanna, and

J. G. Brasseur

223 8.10 TWO-TIME STATISTICS OF RELATIVE DIFFUSION IN DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF

TURBULENCE. P. K. Yeung, Georgia Inst, of Technology, Atlanta, GA

225 8.11 ENERGYSPECTRA IN THE MESOSCALE RANGE: AN LES STUDY. Harm J. Jonker, Utrecht Univ.,Utrecht, The Netherlands; and P. G. Duynkerke and J. W. M. Cuijpers

8.12 PAPER WITHDRAWN

227 8.13 RECENT VALIDATION OFTHE OPERATIONAL MULTI-SCALE ENVIRONMENTMODELWITH GRID

ADAPTIVITY. Z. Boybeyi, Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), McLean, VA; and D. P.

Bacon, N. Ahmat, T. J. Dunn, M. Hall, D. E. Mays, R. A. Sarma, M. D. Turner, S. Young, and J. Zack

POSTER SESSION P8: LARGE-EDDY & DIRECT-NUMERICAL SIMULATION

229 P8.1 THE CONCEPT OF LES FLUIDS AND A SIMILARITY THEORY OF LES-GENERATED TURBU¬

LENCE. Andreas Muschinski, NCAR, Boulder, CO and Univ. of Hanover, Hanover, Germany

P8.2 A COUPLED URGE-EDDY SIMULATION AND LAGRANGIAN PARTICLE DISPERSION MODEL TO

STUDY TURBULENCE AND DISPERSION IN COMPLEX TERRAINS. S. G. Gopalakrishnan, Cook

College - Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ; and R. Avissar

P8.3 PAPER MOVED TO 8.2A

* P8.4 AT WHICH SCALE LAND-SURFACE HETEROGENEITY AFFECTS THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY

LAYER: LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS AND WAVELET ANALYSIS. Roni Avissar, Cook College -

Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ; and T. Schmidt and F. Zeng

* P8.5 LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER OVER PARTIALLY ICE

COVERED WATER. Siegfried Raasch, Univ. of Hannover, Hannover, Germany; and G. Harbusch

231 P8.6 A STUDY OF SURFACE-LAYER SUBGRID-SCALE MODELING FROM HIGH RESOLUTION LARGE-

EDDY SIMULATION FIELDS. Samir Khanna, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and J. C.

Wyngaard and J. G. Brasseur

P8.7 FOG MODELING USING THE RAMS MODEL. J. Christopher Clarke, Colorado State Univ., Ft.

Collins, CO; and W. R. Cotton

233 P8.8 PERFORMANCE OF SUBGRID-SCALEMODELS IN ANISOTROPICTURBULENCE. AnuragJuneja,Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and J. G. Brasseur and J. C. Wyngaard

*

Manuscript not available xiii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 2th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

page

235 P8.9 SENSITIVITY OF L. E.S. STATISTICS TO RESOLUTION. J. Cuxart, Spanish Met. Inst., Madrid,Spain; and P. Bougeault and J.-L. Redelsperger

237 P8.10 LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF AIRCRAFT WAKE VORTICES: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE

EFFECTS. J. Han, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC; and Y.-L. Lin, D. G. Schowalter, S. P.

An/a, and F. H. Proctor

239 P8.11 LARGE-EDDY-INDUCED GRAVITY WAVES AND THEIR INTERACTIONS WITH THE SHEAR.

Yu-Chieng Liou, National Central Univ., Chung-Li, Taiwan

241 P8.12 SENSITIVITIES IN TURBULENT FIELDS WITHIN LES OF CONVECTIVE PBLs. Alexander

Gluhovsky, Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN; and E. Agee

SESSION 9: WAVELET, FRACTAL, AND CHAOS METHODS

243 9.1 USING THE CHAOTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE TIME SERIES OBSERVED ON FLIP TO IDENTIFY MABL

COHERENT STRUCTURES. Aric Rogers, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and H. N, Shirer,G. S. Young, L. Suciu, R. Wells and J. B. Edson, S. W. Wetzel, C. Friehe, T. Hristov, and S. Miller

245 9.2 ANALYSIS OF THE TURBULENT STRUCTURE OVER AN ANTARCTIC ICE SHELF BY MEANS OF

THE WAVELET-TRANSFORMATION. Doerthe Handorf, German Weather Service, Lindenberg,Germany; and T. Foken

247 9.3 GROUND LEVEL GUST FREQUENCY COUPLED TO PBL LARGE EDDIES. David R. Miller, Univ.

of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and Y. Wang and R. M. Clonco

249 9.4 USING WAVELETS TO STUDY MIXING IN STABLY STRATIFIED TURBULENT FLOW. PaulPlccirlllo, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA; and R. L. Street and J, R. Koseff

9.5 SCALE ANALYSIS OF CLOUD FIELDS USING THE CONTINUOUS WAVELET TRANSFORM. HarmJ. Jonker, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, the Netherlands; and P. Siebesma

9.6 TURBULENT MIXING ACROSS AN ANOMALOUS SCALING CLOUD BOUNDARY. A. Pier

Siebesma, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands; and H. J. Jonker

9.7 PAPER WITHDRAWN

SESSION 10: BOUNDARY LAYER MODELS

251 10.1 COUPLED ATMOSPHERE-FIRE APPROACH TO MODELING WILDFIRES. T. L Clark, NCAR,Boulder, CO; and M. A. Jenkins

253 10.2 MESOSCALE CELLULAR CONVECTION: AN "ACID TEST" FOR NWP BOUNDARY LAYER

SCHEMES. Brian Fiedler, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman OK

255 10.3 MASS-FLUX SCHEMES FOR TRANSPORT OF NON-REACTIVE AND REACTIVE SCALARS IN THE

CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Arthur C. Petersen, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, The Netherlands; and

C. Beets, H. van Dop, P. G. Duynkerke, and A. P. Siebema

257 10.4 A MODEL FOR STRONG UPDRAFTS IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. Aad P. Van

Ulden, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands; and A. P. Siebesma

10.5 VALIDATION OF TRANSILIENT TURBULENCE THEORY NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS AGAINST

PROJECT CONDORS EXPERIMENTAL DATA. Richard A. Blauw, New Mexico State Univ., Socorro,NM; and H. Modzelewski, J. J. Martin, and R. Long

259 10.6 EVALUATION OF BOUNDARY LAYER KINEMATIC BACK TRAJECTORIES DURING THE 1995

SOUTHERN OXIDANT FIELD CAMPAIGN. Jerome D. Fast, PNNL, Richland, WA; and W. J. Shaw

*

Manuscript not available xiv

table of contents


poster session p10: boundary layer models

p10.1 modeling the marine atmospheric boundary layer: response of integrated bl

PROPERTIES TO SURFACE FLUX FORCING. Gad Levy, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR; andM. B. Ek

261 P10.2 STRATOCUMULUS 1D/CRM INTERCOMPARISON USING THE SAME TURBULENCE SCHEME.

J. Cuxart, Spanish Met. Inst., Madrid, Spain; and E. Sanchez

263 P10.3 VALIDATION OF A COLUMN BOUNDARY LAYER MODEL (COBEL) USING DATA FROM THEWAKE VORTEX FIELD MEASUREMENT PROGRAM. Robert Tardif, Univ. of Quebec, Montreal, PQ,Canada; and P. Zwack

265 P10.4 CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER GROWTH DURING THE 1995 NARSTO-NORTHEAST FIELD

EXPERIMENT. Jerome D. Fast, PNNL, Richland, WA; and C. M. Berkowitz

P10.5 THE EFFECTS OF PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER PARAMETERIZATIONS ON THE CHEMICAL

SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS IN A CHEMISTRY TRANSPORT MODEL. Bryan J. Hannegan, Univ. of

California, Irvine, CA

P10.6 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE EFFECT OF DRIZZLE ON THE MARINE CLOUD-TOPPED

BOUNDARY LAYER. Yinong Wang, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and P. Austin

* P10.7 EFFECTS OF THE IBERIAN THERMAL LOW FORMATION OVER THE COASTAL AREAS. Millan

Millan, Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterraneo,Valencia, Spain; and R. Salvador and E.

Mantilla

* P10.8 BOUNDARY LAYER SIMULATIONS FOR A WET SEASON OVER THE SEMI-ARID REGION OF

BRAZIL. Vicente de Paula Sllva Fllho, Instltuto Naclonal de Pesqulsas Espaclals,Sao Jose Dos

Campos, Brazil; and K. do Carmo Mendes, R. R. da Silva, and H. A. Araujo

267 P10.9 COMPARISON OF OPTICAL TURBULENCE MODELS FOR FORECAST APPLICATIONS. Montie

M. Orgill, Southern Utah Univ., Cedar City, UT; and K. P. Freeman and R. E. Davis

269 P10.10 A NUMERICAL DISPERSION MODEL UTILIZING TRANSILIENT TURBULENCE. MODEL FORMU¬

LATION AND TEST SIMULATIONS. Henryk Modzelewski, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,

Canada

271 P10.11 A COMPARISON OF PRACTICAL METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MIXING HEIGHTS.

Petra Seibert, Inst, for Meteorology and Physics, Vienna, Austria; and F. Beyrich, S.-E. Gryning, S.

Joffre, A. Rasmussen, and P. Tercier

* P10.12 COMPARISONOFTHIRD-MOMENT CLOSURE AND LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS OF CLEAR AND

CLOUD-TOPPED CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS. Steven K. Krueger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake

City, UT; and Q. Shao

SESSION 11: SURFACE LAYERS

273 11.1 MODIFICATIONS OF MONIN-OBUKHOV THEORY IN UNSTABLE CONDITIONS. Ann-Sofi

Smedman, Univ. of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; and C. Johansson

11.2 SCALAR FLUXES, PROFILES AND BUDGETS FROM A VERY TALL TOWER. Kenneth J. Davis,

Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; and P. S. Bakwin and W. M. Angevine

275 11.3 TURBULENT TRANSPORT OF MOMENTUM AND SENSIBLE HEAT IN AN ATMOSPHERIC

SURFACE LAYER WITH HORIZONTALLY VARYING TEMERATURE FIELD. Eberhard Schaller,

Brandenburgische Technische Univ., Cottbus, Germany

*

Manuscript not available XV

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PAGE

277 11.4 APPLICATION OF SURFACE LAYER SIMILARITY IN A HETEROGENEOUS DESERT ECOSYSTEM.

W. P. Kustas, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD; and J. H. Prueger, L E. Hipps, and

J. L Hatfield

11.5 PAPER MOVED TO P11.5A

279 11.6 SCALING THE TKE BUDGET ABOVE A ROUGHNESS SUBLAYER. Paul Frenzen, IndependentResearcher, Port Townsend, WA; and C. A. Vogel

POSTER SESSION P11: SURFACE LAYERS

281 P11.1 EFFECTS OF A DRY COLD FRONT PASSAGE ON SURFACE-LAYER TURBULENCE. M. Piper,Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO; and W. Blumen and N. Gamage

P11.2 ON THE SIMILARITY OF THE TURBULENTTRANSPORT OF DIFFERENT SCALAR QUANTITIES

IN THE SURFACE LAYER. Christof Ammann, Max Planck Inst, for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany; and

F. X. Meixner

283 P11.3 STRUCTURE OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER OVER THE OCEANWAVES— PHASE

AVERAGING VIA THE HILBERT TRANSFORM. T. Hristov, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA; and C.

Friehe, S. Miller, J. B. Edson, and S. W. Wetzel

285 P11.4 THE STATISTICAL STRUCTURE OF AIR FLOW OVER SEA SWELL. Jeffrey E. Hare, CIRES/Univ.

of Colorado and NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and J. M. Wilczak, C. W. Fairall, T. Hara, and J. B.

Edson


287 P11.5A ESTIMATION OF THE SURFACESOURCE AREATHAT AFFECTS A FLUX MEASUREMENT IN THE

ATMOSPHERE. Mei Xu, Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA; and M. Y. Leclerc and B. Lamb (formerly 11.5)

289 P11.6 AERODYNAMIC ROUGHNESS ESTIMATED FROM SURFACE FEATURES FOR A COPPICE DUNE

AREA USING LASER ALTIMETER DATA. A. C. De Vries, Univ. of Groningen, Haren, The

Netherlands; and J. C. Ritchie, M. Menenti, and W. P. Kustas

291 P11.7 THE USE OF SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF WIND DERIVED

STRESS ANDWAVE CHARACTERISTICS. Mark A. Bourassa, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL;and D. M. Legler and J. J. O'Brien

P11.8 THE PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF THE NOCTURNAL SURFACE LAYER DURING

OZONE EPISODES. H. Allan Wiebe, Atmospheric Environment Service (AES), Downsview, ON,Canada; and R. E. Mickle and J. Pudykiewicz

293 P11.9 SYNERGISTIC INTERACTION BETWEEN A GREAT PLAINS NOCTURNAL LOW-LEVEL JET AND

THE MASS ADJUSTMENTS ACCOMPANYING A SUBTROPICAL JET STREAK. Michael L. Kaplan,North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC; and R. P. Weglarz, A. H. Langmaid, Y.-L. Lin, and D. W.

Hamilton

SESSION 12: OCEAN BOUNDARY LAYERS

295 12.1 EVOLUTION OF LANGMUIR TURBULENCE DURING A STORM. Jerome A. Smith, SIO, La Jolla,CA

12.2 NEAR SURFACE DISSIPATION RATES: ARE RECENT MEASUREMENTS AND MODELS

CONSISTENT? Eugene A. Terray, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst. (WHOI), Woods Hole, MA; andW. M. Drennan

*

Manuscript not available xvi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE


296 12.3 OCEANIC LATENT HEAT FLUX FROM SIMULATED SSM/I DATA. Bart Brashers, Univ. of

Washington, Seattle, WA

298 12.4 SIMULATION OFTHEMICROSTRUCTURE PROFILE OFTHE OCEANIC MIXED LAYER. Yign Noh,Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea; and C. J. Jang and H. J. Kim

300 12.5 TURBULENCE IN THE UPPER TWO METRES OF THE OCEAN AT HIGH SEA STATES. JohannesR. Gemmrich, Inst, of Ocean Sciences, Sidney and Univ. of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada; and D.

Farmer

12.6 ON THE BENTHIC BOUNDARY LAYER'S DYNAMICS. Evgeny A. Kontar, Russian Academy of

Sciences, Moscow, Russia; and A. V. Sokov

SESSION 13: MARINE SURFACE LAYERS

302 13.1 THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE WAVES ON SIMILARITY THEORY IN THE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC

BOUNDARY LAYER. Anna Rutgersson, Univ. of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; and A.-S. Smedman

304 13.2 STRUCTURE OF THE ATMOSPHERIC WAVE INDUCED BOUNDARY LAYER. Peter P. Sullivan,NCAR, Boulder, CO; and J. C. McWilliams and C.-H. Moeng

306 13.3 EFFECT OF SHORT SURFACE WAVES ON THE WIND STRESS UNDER TRANSIENTCONDITIONS. B. Mete Uz, Univ. of Rhode Island, Narransett, Rl; and T. Hara, E. J. Bock, and M. A.

Donelan

308 13.4 WIND AND TURBULENCE PROFILES IN THE SURFACE LAYER OVER THE OCEAN. Scott Miller,Univ. of California, Irvine, CA; and C. Friehe, T. Hristov, and J. B. Edson

310 13.5 DISSIPATION MEASUREMENTS IN THE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER. ChristophA. Vogel, NOAA/Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Div. (ATDD), Oak Ridge, TN; and T. L.

Crawford

312 13.6 THE TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY BUDGET DURING RASEX. James M. Wilczak, NOAA/ERL7

ETL, Boulder, CO; and J. B. Edson, T. Hara, J. Hojstrup, and J. E. Hare

314 13.7 ENERGY FLUX AND DISSIPATION PROFILES IN THE MARINE SURFACE LAYER. James B.

Edson, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA; and S. W. Wetzel, C. Friehe, S. Miller, and T. Hristov

POSTER SESSION P13: MARINE BOUNDARY LAYERS

316 P13.1 DAYTIME EVOLUTION OF SURFACE LAYER WINDS AND WIND STRESS ALONG THE OREGON

COAST DURING UPWELLING CONDITIONS. David H. Levinson, CIRES/Univ. of Colorado and

NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and R. M. Banta

318 P13.2 DIRECT HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENTS WITH A TOWED INSTRUMENT. Fabian Wolk, Univ. of

Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada; and R. G. Lueck

320 P13.3 SPATIAL-VARIABILITY AND REPRESENTATIVENESS CONSIDERATIONS FOR SITING

INSTRUMENTED MASTS AND TOWERS NEAR COASTLINES. R. M. Banta, NOAA/ERL/ETL,

Boulder, CO; and D. H. Levinson

322 P13.4 HORIZONTAL VARIABILITY IN OCEAN SURFACE MIXING IN RESPONSE TO WIND FORCING.

Blair J. W. Greenan, Bedford Inst, of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS, Canada; and F. W. Dobson, N.

S. Oakey, and S. D. Smith

324 P13.5 ORIENTATION OF WIND AND WAVES: EFFECT ON LANGMUIR CIRCULATION. Vadim

Polonichko, Inst, of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, and Univ. of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada; and D.

Farmer

*

Manuscript not available xvii

table of contents


page


326 P13.7 AN EXPLICIT METHOD FOR DETERMINING TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS IN A MARINE SURFACE

LAYER. Aloysius kou-fang Lo, AES, Downsview, ON, Canada

328 P13.8 COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND PRODUCTION TERMS IN THE BUDGETS OF

TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY VARIANCE AND COVARIANCE. Anna M. Sempreviva, Risoe

National Lab., Roskilde, Denmark; and J. Hojstrup

330 P13.9 INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MICRO SCALE CELLULAR CONVECTION IN AN EQUATORIAL

MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER REVEALED BY LIDAR AND LES MODELS. D. I.

Cooper, LANL, Los Alamos, NM; and W. E. Eichinger, R. E. Ecke, J. C. Y. Kao, J. M. Reisner, and L.

L. Teilier

332 P13.10 PLUME STRUCTURES IN THE CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER FROM HIGH-FREQUENCYSODAR DATA. Kathrin Baumann, Central Inst, for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna, Austria

334 P13.11 VARIATION OF MICRO-METEOROLOGICAL WIND CHARACTERISTICS DURING THE PASSAGEOF A HURRICANE. John L Schroeder, Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, TX; and D. A. Smith and R. E.Peterson

SESSION 14: COAST96 FIELD EXPERIMENT

14.1 COASTAL-TRAPPED DISTURBANCES IN A LOCALLY SUPERCRITICALSHALLOW-WATER MABLFLOW. Audrey M. Rogerson, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA; and R. M. Samelson

336 14.2 COASTAL BOUNDARY-LAYER DYNAMICS AT A COMPLEX COASTLINE WITH A COASTALMOUNTAIN BARRIER. Michael Tjernstrom, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden; and L. Strom

338 14.3 RESEARCH AlRCRAFT OBSERVATIONS OF AWARM FRONT N EAR VANCOUVER ISLAND FROMTHE 12/9/95 CASE OF COAST. Nicholas A. Bond, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA; and B. A.

Walter

340 14.4 INTERACTION OF A SHALLOW, SUPERCRITICAL MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER WITH STEEP

COASTAL OROGRAPHY. Stephen D. Burk, NRL, Monterey, CA; and T. Haack and W. T. Thompson

342 14.5 LONG GRAVITY WAVES IN CALIFORNIA'S SUMMER MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER. Clive E.

Dorman, SIO, La Jolla, CA; and B. Grisogono and D. P. Rogers

344 14.6 STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF A COASTAL TRAPPED DISTURBANCE. Peter L. Jackson, Univ.of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada; and C. J. C. Reason and S. Guan

346 14.7 AIRFLOW AND STRATIFICATION IN PROPAGATING SOUTHERLY SURGES WITHIN THESUMMERTIME MARINE LAYER OFF CALIFORNIA AND OREGON. John M. Bane, Unlv. of North

Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

POSTER SESSION P14: COAST96 FIELD EXPERIMENT


348 P14.2 RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TOPOGRAPHY AND AIR-SEA INTERACTION TO A COASTALTRAPPED DISTURBANCE. Shucai Guan, Univ. of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC,Canada; and P. L. Jackson and C. J. C. Reason

350 P14.3 THE EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY AND INITIAL CONDITIONS ON IDEALIZED COASTAL TRAPPEDDISTURBANCE EVOLUTION. Hai Fu, Univ. of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC,Canada; and C. J. C. Reason and P. L. Jackson

*

Manuscript not available xviii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE


352 P14.4 OBSERVATIONS AND SIMULATIONS OF THE COASTAL JET DURING THE COASTAL WAVESPROGRAM IN JUNE 1996. Darko Koracin, DRI, Reno, NV; and V. J. Frye, V. Isakov, and P. Saha

SESSION 15: INSTRUMENTATION

354 15.1 INTERCOMPARISON OF ULTRASONIC ANEMOMETERS. Roland Vogt, Univ. of Basel, Basel,Switzerland; and C. Feigenwinter, K. T. Paw U, and A. Pitacco

356 15.2 COMPARISON OF NEW-TYPE SONIC ANEMOMETERS. Thomas Foken, German Weather Service,Lindenberg, Germany; and U. Weisensee, H.-J. Kirzel, and V. Thiermann

358 15.3 CONTINUOUS TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE PROFILING OF THE PLANETARY BOUNDARYLAYER. W. F. Feltz, Cooperative Inst, for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSSVUniv. ofWisconsin, Madison, Wl; and W. L. Smith, R. O. Knuteson, H. E. Revercomb, and H. B. Howell

360 15.4 MEASUREMENT OF WATER VAPOR FLUXES USING CAPACITANCE RH SENSORS ANDCOSPECTRAL SIMILARITY. T. W. Horst, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and S. P. Oncley and S. R. Semmer

362 15.5 WATER-VAPOR FLUX PROFILES MEASURED BY A COMBINATION OF A RADAR-RASSPROFILER AND A DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION LIDAR. Lutz Hirsch, Univ. of Hamburg, Hamburg,Germany; and V. Wulfmeyerand J. Boesenberg

364 15.6 DANISH H20 AND COa FLUX MEASUREMENTS INTER-COMPARISON—RIMI'95. Anna M.

Sempreviva, Risoe National Lab., Roskilde, Denmark; and P. Hummelshoej, N. O. Jensen, and K.

Pilegaard

POSTER SESSION P15: INSTRUMENTATION

366 P15.1 OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE FLOW EXIT JETS OVER THE CHESAPEAKE BAY

USING THE ERS-1 SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR, Nathaniel S. Winstead, Penn State Univ.,Universty Park, PA; and G. S. Young, D. R. Thompson, and H. N. Shirer

368 P15.2 PRELIMINARY LASER DOPPLER VELOCIMETER MEASUREMENTS OF WIND PROFILES IN AN

URBAN DOMAIN. Ronald M. Cionco, US Army Research Lab., Adelphi, MD; and G. Steele and G.

Moran

370 P15.3 IN-SITU OBSERVATIONS OF THE SUB-METER-SCALE MICROSTRUCTURE OF WIND,TEMPERATURE, AND HUMIDITY IN THE FREE TROPOSPHERE. Andreas Muschinski, NCAR,Boulder, CO; and C. Wode

372 P15.4 COMPARISON OF HEAT AND MOMENTUM FLUXES OVER GRASS AS DERIVED BY LASERSCINTILLATION AND ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENTS. Ulrich Teichmann, Inst, for TroposphericResearch, Leipzig, Germany; and J. Laubach and F. Beyrich

374 P15.5 SAMPLING EFFECTS ON 3D WIND FIELD RETRIEVALS USING 4D VARIATIONAL ASSIMILATION.

Rob K. Newsom, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and R. M. Banta

376 P15.6 PRELIMINARY COMPARISONS OF VOLUME-IMAGING RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF TURBULENTSTRUCTURES IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER WITH LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS.Brian D. Pollard, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; and S. J. Frasier, J. B. Mead, G. Hopcraft, andR. E. Mcintosh

P15.7 THE DEVELOPMENTOF TURBULENCE DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR AIRPORTS NEAR COMPLEXTERRAIN. Peter P. Neilley, NCAR/Research Applications Program (RAP), Boulder, CO; and L. B.

Cornman

378 P15.8 EVALUATION OF THE K-GILL PROPELLER VANE. Job W. Verkaik, Wageningen Agricultural Univ.,Wageningen/The Netherlands

* Manuscript not available xix

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PAGE

380 P15.9 A LOW-POWER HUMIDITY SENSOR FOR TURBULENCE RESEARCH. Steven P. Oncley, NCAR,Boulder, CO; and S. R. Semmer, C. L Frush, and W. Kohsiek

382 P15.10 A CHEAP, ACCURATE, RAPID-RESPONSE OZONE SENSOR FOR COVARIANCE DETER¬

MINATION OF SURFACE DEPOSITION FLUX. Anthony C. Delany, NCAR, Boulder, CO; and S. R

Semmer and J. Bognar

384 P15.11 DEVELOPMENT, CHARACTERIZATION, AND TESTING OF A HIGH RESOLUTION, FAST

RESPONSE SCAUR TRANSPORT PROBE. Meredith M. Metzger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT;and J. C. Klewicki and G. M. Chandler

386 P15.12 A LOW PROFILE METEOROLOGICAL BUOY FOR TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY GRADIENT

MEASUREMENTS NEARTHE AIR/SEA INTERFACE. P. Perry Ostrowski, Naval Surface Warfare Ctr,W. Bethesda, MD

388 P15.13 ESTIMATING LATENT HEAT FLUXES FROM MEASUREMENTS OF SONIC-TEMPERATURE AND

AIR-TEMPERATURE HEAT FLUXES. Larry Jacobsen, Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT; and E.

Swiatek and B. D. Tanner

SESSION 16: PLANT & SOIL MICROMET AND BIOSPHERE MODELS

389 16.1 A SIMPLE ANALYTICAL MODELOF COHERENT TURBULENT TRANSFER IN CANOPIES. Michael

D. Novak, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

391 16.2 COHERENT STRUCTURES AND TURBULENT STATISTICS ABOVE AND WITHIN MAIZE PLANT

CANOPIES: OBSERVATIONS, ANALYSIS, AND MODELLING. Kyaw Tha Paw U, Univ. of California,Davis, CA; and R. Vogt, R. H. Shaw, T. Hsiao, A. Moles, H.-B. Su, and B. Yang

16.3 A SECOND ORDER TURBULENCE CLOSURE FOR VEGETATION CANOPIES. Keith W. Ayotte,CSIRO, Canberra, Australia; and J. J. Finnigan and M, R. Raupach

393 16.4 A DYNAMIC MODEL FOR THE PLANT CANOPY MICROCLIMATE. Ca Thanh Vu, Saitama Univ.,Urawa, Saitama, Japan; and T. Asaeda and T. Fujino

395 16.5 EFFECT OF TURBULENCE ON NOCTURNAL C02 FLUXES ABOVE A BOREAL ASPEN FOREST.Paul C. Yang, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and T. A. Black, W. J. Chen, P. D.

Blanken, H. H. Neumann, M. D. Novak, Z. Nesic, and X. Lee

397 16.6 ESTIMATION OF COa ANDWATER VAPOUR FLUXES ABOVE A BOREAL FOREST USING AN AIR

RENEWAL MODEL. W. J. Chen, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and T. A. Black,M. D. Novak, A. G. Barr, and Z. Nesic

POSTER SESSION P16: PLANT & SOIL MICROMET AND BIOSPHERE MODELS


399 P16.2 TWO-POINT CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF FLOW WITHIN AND ABOVE A FOREST FROMLARGE-EDDY SIMULATION. Hong-Bing Su, Univ. of California, Davis, CA; and R. H. Shaw and K.

T. Paw U

P16.3 INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE CONVECTIVE PBL AND SOIL MOISTURE AND VEGETATIONPARAMETERIZATIONS. Wen-Yih Sun, Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN; and M. G. Bosilovich

401 P16.4 SIMULATION OF THE SURFACE CLIMATOLOGY OF ALPINE TUNDRA USING CLASS. Ian R.Saunders, Simon Fraser Univ., Burnaby, BC, Canada; and W. G. Bailey, J. D. Bowers, and Z. Huo

403 P16.5 ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN BOREAL FOREST AND THE LOWER ATMOSPHERE. HanjieWang, AES, Toronto, ON, Canada; and Y.-F. Li and A. k.-f. Lo

*

Manuscript not available XX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE


405 P16.6 TREE DENSITY EFFECTS ON TURBULENT FLOW: A WIND TUNNEL STUDY. Jon S. Warland,Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; and M. D. Novak, A. L. Orchansky, and R. Ketler

P16.7 MEASUREMENTS AND SIMULATIONS OF WIND AND TREE MOTION IN FOREST CUTBLOCKS.John D. Wilson, Univ. of Alberta, Calgery, AB, Canada; and T. K. Flesch

407 P16.8 IMPACT OF PHENOLOGY ON MOMENTUM TRANSPORT TO A DECIDUOUS FOREST. Ricardo

K. Sakai, SUNY, Albany, NY; and D. R. Fitzjarrald, K. E. Moore, and J. W. Sicker

409 P16.9 A LINEAR MODEL FOR GRAVITY WAVES IN FOREST. Xuhui Lee, Yale Univ., New Haven, CT

SESSION 17: MISC. FIELD EXPERIMENTS

411 17.1 THE 1995 KWINANA SHORELINE FUMIGATION STUDY. Brian L Sawford, CSIRO, Aspendale, Vic,Australia; and A. K. Luhar, J. M. Hacker, S. A. Young, J. A. Noonan, J. N. Carras, D. J. Williams, andK. N. Rayner

413 17.2 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF C02 FLUX DATA FROM ASGAMAGE-B. Christopher W. Fairall,NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and J. E. Hare, S. D. Smith, R. A. Anderson, and W. Kohsiek

415 17.3 AIR-SEA INTERACTION MEASUREMENTS DURING THE FRONTS AND ATLANTIC STORM

TRACKS EXPERIMENT (FASTEX). P. O. G. Persson, NOAA/ERL/ETL and CIRES/Univ. of Colorado,Boulder, CO; and J. E. Hare, C. W. Fairall, S. S. Atakturk, and K. Katsaros

* 17.4 THE BOUNDARY LAYER OVER EAST ANTARCTICA OBSERVED WITH A 915 MHZ WIND

PROFILER, SODAR, AND SURFACE INSTRUMENTATION. William D. Neff, NOAA/ERL/ETL,

Boulder, CO; and D. Gottas

417 17.5 VERTICAL PROFILES OF METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES AND OZONE CONCENTRATIONS IN

THE NOCTURNAL BOUNDARY LAYER AT GETTYSBURG, PA. Richard D. Clark, Millersville Univ.,

Millersville, PA

419 17.6 CONVECTIVE TRANSPORTTHEORY FOR SURFACE FLUXES, TESTED OVER THE WESTERN

PACIFIC WARM POOL. Lawrence Greischar, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wl; and R. B. Stull

POSTER SESSION P17: MISC. FIELD EXPERIMENTS

421 P17.1 RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF THE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER DURING MERMOZ. Norman

R. Donaldson, Environment Canada, King City, ON, Canada; and W. O. J. Brown and R. R. Rogers

423 P17.2 THE MERMOZ DATABASE AND ITS ACCESS FOR BOUNDARY-LAYER AND OZONE MODELS

VALIDATION. Robert Benoit, Environment Canada, Dorval, PQ, Canada; and J. He

P17.3 AEROSOL LAYERS ABOVE THE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER DURING MERMOZ. J. Walter

Strapp, AES, Dowsnview, ON, Canada; and W. R. Leaitch, J. I. MacPherson, and J. Mailhot

425 P17.4 SOIL MOISTURE AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN A BOREAL JACK PINE FOREST. Kathleen E.

Moore, Univ. at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY; and D. R. Fitzjarrald, R. K. Sakai, J. M. Freedman, and

0. C. Acevedo

427 P17.5 THE VARIATION OF SEASONAL LATENT ENERGY FLUXES FROM TWO DISTINCT SURFACE

TYPES. Tilden P. Meyers, NOAA/ARL/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN; and D. D. Baldocchi

429 P17.6 BOUNDARY LAYER EXPERIMENT 1996. Larry K. Berg, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,

Canada; and E. Santoso, R. B. Stull, and J. P. Hacker

* Manuscript not available XXI

TABLE OF CONTENTS


431 P17.7 DEVELOPMENT OF AN ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE LAYER TURBULENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL

TEST (SLTEST) FACILITY. Christopher A. Biltoft, U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground, Dugway, UT;

and J. C. Klewicki, E. Malek, R. Price, and S. Turley

433 P17.8 CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS OF EXTINCTION IN HAZE AND COMPARISON WITH AIRCRAFT

OBSERVATIONS. Mark Shephard, McGill Univ., Montreal, PQ, Canada; and J. W. Strapp and R. R.

Rogers

435 P17.9 MONITORING AND ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE LAYER AT LOW WIND SPEEDS IN STABLE

PBLS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA. H. Andrew Gray, Systems ApplicationsInternational, San Rafael, CA; and E. L. Carr, C. A. Biltoft, and J. Pederson

SESSION 18: MERMOZ AND BOREAS FIELD EXPERIMENTS

437 18.1 THE MONTREAL-96 EXPERIMENT ON REGIONAL MIXING AND OZONE (MERMOZ): AN

OVERVIEW. Jocelyn Mailhot, AES, Dorval, PQ, Canada; and R. Benoit, S. Belair, J. W. Strapp, andJ. I. MacPherson

439 18.2 THE TWIN OTTER AIRCRAFT PROGRAM IN MERMOZ. J. Ian MacPherson, National Research

Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada; and J. W. Strapp and J. Mailhot

441 18.3 AN EVALUATION OF A HEAT FLUX RETRIEVAL METHOD USING MERMOZ DATA. Guy Potvin,McGill Univ., Montreal, PQ, Canada; and J. I. MacPherson, R. R. Rogers, N. R. Donaldson, and J. W.

Strapp

443 18.4 AN EVALUATION OF A TKE-BASED BOUNDARY LAYER USING CLEAR DAY CASES FROMMERMOZ. Stephane Belair, Environment Canada, Dorval, PQ, Canada; and J. Mailhot, J. W. Strapp,J. I. MacPherson, and R. Benoit

445 18.5 MERMOZ DATA COMPARISON TO MODEL CALCULATIONS. Jeana Goldstein, AES, Dorval, PQ,Canada

447 18.6 A BOUNDARY-LAYER CLIMATOLOGY OF THE BOREAL FOREST. Alan G. Barr, AES, Saskatoon,SK, Canada; and A. K. Betts

449 18.7 LAND BREEZES AND INTERNAL BOUNDARY LAYER DEVELOPMENT. Jielun Sun, Univ. of

Colorado, Boulder, CO; and R. L. Desjardins, L. Mahrt, and J. I. MacPherson

SESSION 19: URBAN BOUNDARY LAYERS

451 19.1 REVIEW OF URBAN TURBULENCE MEASUREMENTS. Matthias Roth, Univ. of British Columbia,Vancouver, BC, Canada

453 19.2 THE EFFECT OF URBAN ROUGHNESS SUBLAYER TURBULENCE ON DISPERSION. MathiasW.

Rotach, Swiss Federal Inst, of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland

455 19.3 TRANSFER MECHANISMS OVER AN URBAN SURFACE FOR WATER VAPOR, SENSIBLE HEAT,AND MOMENTUM. Thomas S. King, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN; and C. S. B. Grimmond

457 19.4 URBAN ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS: MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS. C. S. B. Grimmond, IndianaUniv., Bloomington, IN; and T. R. Oke

459 19.5 THERMAL PLUMES IN AN URBAN CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYER. X.-M. Cai, Univ. of

Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

461 19.6 AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THE BOUNDARY LAYER STRUCTURE IN PARIS AND ITSSUBURBS BY MEANS OF SODARS AND LIDARS. Eric Dupont, Electricite de France, Chatou,France; and B. Carissimo, L. Menut, J. Pelon, and P. H. Flamant

*

Manuscript not available xxii

TABLE OF CONTENTS


463 19.7 the effect of microscale urban canyon flow on mesoscale puff dispersion.

Michael J. Brown, LANL, Los Alamos, NM; and C. Muller

POSTER SESSION P19: URBAN BOUNDARY LAYERS

465 P19.1 LIDAR NETWORKAND AIRBORNE OBSERVATIONS OF THE CLOUD STREET OVER TOKYO IN

SUMMER. Kenji Kai, Univ. of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; and K. Wakiyama, M. Fujii, K.

Niwano, D. Muramatsu, M. Abo, C. Nagasawa, T. Murayama, H. Hara, and H. Nakajima

467 P19.2 INSTRUMENTAL COMPARISONS AND ONE-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATIONS OF THE BOUNDARY

LAYER OVER THE PARIS AREA DURING THE ECLAP EXPERIMENT. Laurent Menut, Serviced'Aeronomie du CNRS, Paris, France; and J. Pelon, E. DuPont, B. Carissimo, and P. H. Flamant

468 P19.3 INFLUENCE OF AIRFIELD STRUCTURES AND COMPLEX TERRAIN UPON SIMULATED LOCAL

WIND FIELDS. Ronald M. Cionco, U.S. Army Research Lab., Adelphi, MD; and J. H. Byers

470 P19.4 EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT PAVEMENTS ON THE URBAN THERMAL ENVIRONMENT, Takashi

Asaeda, Saitama Univ., Saitama, Japan; and C. T. Vu


472 P19.6 VERTICLE STRUCTURE OF TURBULENCE ABOVE AN URBAN CANOPY. Christian Feigenwinter,Univ. of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and R. Vogt and E. Parlow

SESSION 20: SURFACE FLUX

474 20.1 HEAT FLUX IN THE COASTAL ZONE. Larry Mahrt, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR; and D. Vickers

476 20.2 SURFACE FLUX PARAMETERIZATIONS FOR THE STABLE COASTAL MARINE BOUNDARY

LAYER. David P. Rogers, SIO, La Jolla, CA; and L. Strom and I. M. Brooks

478 20.3 EVALUATION OF A COUPLED LAND-SURFACE AND DRY DEPOSITION MODEL THROUGH

COMPARISON TO FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SURFACE HEAT, MOISTURE, AND OZONE

FLUXES. Jonathan E. Pleim, NOAA/Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, Research TrianglePark, NC; and A. Xiu, P. L. Finkelstein, and J. F. Clarke

480 20.4 A SURFACE FLUX PARAMETERIZATION BASED ON THE VERTICALLY AVERAGED TURBU¬

LENCE KINETIC ENERGY AND ITS ASSESSMENT IN AN ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL

CIRCULATION MODEL. Changan Zhang, Colorado State Univ, Ft. Collins, CO.; and D. Randall and

M. Branson

482 20.5 HIGH-RESOLUTION SIMULATION OF SURFACE AND TURBULENT FLUXES DURING

HAPEX-MOBILHY. Stephane Belair, CNRM/Meteo-France, Toulouse, France; and P. Lacarrere and

J. Noilhan

20.6 A MODEL INVESTIGATION OF TURBULENCE-DRIVEN PRESSURE PUMPING EFFECTS ON THE

RATE OF DIFFUSION OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND NITROUS OXIDE THROUGH LAYERED

SNOWPACKS. William J. Massman, USDA Forest Service, Ft. Collins, CO; and R. A. Sommerfeld,

A. R. Mosier, K. F. Zeller, T. J. Hehn, and S. G. Rochelle

POSTER SESSION P20: SURFACE FLUX

484 P20.1 DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION OF THE MULTI-LAYER DEPOSITION VELOCITY MODEL Peter L.

Finkelstein, NOAA/Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC; and J. F.

Clarke, T. G. Ellestad, and J. E. Pleim

486 P20.2 STABILITY CORRECTION OF SURFACE WINDS DERIVED FROM SYNTHETIC APERTURE

RADAR. George S. Young, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA; and T. D. Sikora, and D. R.

Thompson

*

Manuscript not available xxiii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12th Symposium on Boundary Layers and turbulence

page

488 P20.3 A SIMPLE SOIL MOISTURE MODEL FOR AIR QUALITY APPLICATIONS. Joseph S. Scire, Earth

Tech, Inc., Concord, MA

490 P20.4 MODELING THE ROLE OF SEA SPRAY ON AIR-SEA HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGE. James

B. Edson, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA; and E. L Andreas

492 P20.5 AIR-SEA FLUXES IN THE LOCAL FREE CONVECTION LIMIT. Andrey A. Grachev, Inst, of

Atmospheric Physics, Moscow, Russia; and C. W. Fairall

P20.6 PAPERWITHDRAWN

494 P20.7 PARAMETERIZATION OF MESOSCALE ENHANCEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE SURFACE FLUXES

OVER TROPICAL OCEANS. Steven K. Krueger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and M. Zulauf

P20.8 REFER TO PAPER P11.7

SESSION 21: BL OVER MOUNTAINS AND COMPLEX TERRAIN

496 21.1 A BOUNDARY-LAYER FIELD EXPERIMENT IN MEXICO CITY. J. C. Doran, PNNL, Richland, WA;

and R. L. Coulter, C. W. King, J. T. Lee, and G. Sosa

21.2 INTERACTION OF THE SLOPE SURFACE LAYER WITH THE VALLEY ATMOSPHERE DURING

HIGH OZONE EPISODES IN THE VOTALP 1996 EXPERIMENT. Erich Mursch-Radlgruber, Univ. for

Bodenkultur, Vienna, Austria; and R. Govindaraj and G. Mursch-Radlgruber

498 21.3 OBSERVATIONS OF DAYTIME MIXED LAYER DEPTHS OVER MOUNTAINOUSTERRAIN DURING

THE TRACT FIELD CAMPAIGN. Stephan F. J. de Wekker, PNNL, Richland, WA; and M. Kossmann

and F. Fiedler

21.4 OPTIMISATION OF MEAN FLOW PROFILES USING AN ADJOINT METHOD. Keith W. Ayotte,CSIRO, Canberra, Australia

21.5 EFFECTS OF ROTATION AND COOLING ON AIRFLOW OVER A 2-DIMENSIONAL RIDGE. James

A. Blockley, Murdoch Univ., Murdoch, Australia; andT. Lyons

500 21.6 BOUNDARY LAYER PROCESSES WITHIN THE MEXICO CITY BASIN AND THEIR IMPACT ON

SURFACE OZONE PATTERNS. PART 1: METEOROLOGICAL ANALYSES AND SIMULATIONS.

Shiyuan S. Zhong, PNNL, Richland, WA; and J. D. Fast and J. C. Doran

502 21.7 MICROMETEOROLOGY OF A DEPRESSION AND THE INFLUENCE OF CAVE AIR FLOW. Roger

H. Shaw, Univ. of California, Davis, CA; and T. Maitani and K. Miyashita

504 21.8 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AMBIENT WINDS, BOUNDARY LAYER STABILITY, AND

THERMALLY FORCED CIRCULATIONS IN COMPLEX TERRAIN. Clark W. King, NOAA/ERL/ETL,Boulder, CO

506 21.9 A PHYSICAL MODEL OF OUTFLOW WINDS IN HOWE SOUND, BRITISH COLUMBIA. Timothy D.

Finnigan, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and S. E. Allen, G. A. Lawrence, D. G.

Steyn, P. L. Jackson, and D. Z. Zhu

508 21.10 CHARACTERISTIC SCALES OF THE INVERSION LAYERS WITHIN DEEP VALLEYS. Sandrine

Anquetin, Lab. des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industrials (LEGI), Grenoble, France; and J.-P.

Chollet and C. Guilbaud

510 21.11 VERTICAL EXCHANGE AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AT THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY

LAYER - FREE TROPOSPHERE TRANSITION ZONE OVER TOPOGRAPHY. Michael Lehnlng,Swiss Federal Inst, of Snow and Avalanche Research, Davosdorf, Switzerland; and G. L. Kok and H.

Richner

*

Manuscript not available xxiv

PAGE

table of contents


21.12 PAPER WITHDRAWN

512 21.13 OBSERVATIONS OF OZONE TRANSPORT IN A VALLEY IN THE SWISS ALPS. Markus Furger,Paul Scherrer Inst., Villigen, Switzerland; and A. Prevot, L. Poggio, J. Dommen, and W. K. Graber

POSTER SESSION P21: BL OVER MOUNTAINS & COMPLEXTERRAIN


P21.2 DIURNAL VARIATION OF LEE VORTICES IN TAIWAN AND SURROUNDINGAREA. Wen-Yin Sun,Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN; and J.-D. Chern

514 P21.3 TRAILING VORTICES IN FLOW AROUND SMOOTHLY SHAPED OBSTACLES. J. M. Hobson, UKMet Office, Bracknell, Berks, UK; and N. Wood

P21.4 SHALLOW MIXED LAYER DURING DRAINAGE CONDITION ALONG THE FRONT RANGE. Erich

Mursch-Radlgruber, Univ. for Bodenkultur, Vienna, Austria; and W. D Neff, R. Govindaraj, and C.

Russel

516 P21.5 BOUNDARY LAYER CIRCULATIONSAND DISPERSION ON NEW MEXICO'S PAJARITO PLATEAU.

Keeley R. Costigan, LANL, Los Alamos, NM; and J. E. Bossert


518 P21.7 AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF TURBULENCE IN THE SPBL Robert J. Kurzeja, WestinghouseSavannah River Co., Aiken, SC

P21.8 OBSERVATIONS OF POLLUTANT VENTING ALONG VALLEY SIDEWALLS. I. G. McKendry, Univ.

of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and P. Zawar-Reza

520 P21.9 RADIATION BUDGET MEASUREMENTS AND SIMULATIONS ALONG THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE

IN COLORADO. Clark W. King, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and D. Ruffieux

P21.10 TURBULENT HEAT, MOMENTUM AND POLLUTANT FLUXES IN THE MEXICO CITY BASIN.

Graciela B. Raga, Ciudad Univ., Cuidad, Mexico

522 P21.11 SIMULATION OF FLOW OVER TWO-DIMENSIONAL HILLS USING SECOND-ORDER CLOSURE

TURBULENCE MODEL. Ruoxian Ying, NASA, Goddard Inst, for Space Studies, New York, NY; and

V. M. Canuto

524 P21.12 VALLEY CIRCULATIONS OBSERVED WITH A FINE-SCALE SURFACE NETWORK. David R.

Fitzjarrald, Univ. at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY; and G. G. Lala, J. Scolar, and O. C. Acevedo

526 P21.13 STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF TOPOGRAPHICALLY INDUCED DISTURBANCE WITH STRONG

STATIC INSTABILITY ON THE FORMATION OF CLOUD STREETS IN THE LEE OF AN ISOLATED

MOUNTAIN NEAR COAST. Sung-Dae Kang, Univ. of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; and F.

Kimura

528 P21.14 A COMPARISON OF TURBULENT FLOW OVER TWO- AND THREE- DIMENSIONAL SINUSOIDAL

TOPOGRAPHIES. R. Calhoun, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA; and R. L. Street

530 P21.15 STABLY STRATIFIED BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW OVER LOW HILLS: A COMPARISON OF MODEL

RESULTS AND FIELD DATA. Wensong Weng, York Univ., Toronto, ON, Canada; and P. Taylor

532 P21.16 THE RELATION OF VERTICAL MIXING, HORIZONTAL TRANSPORT, AND COMPLEX TERRAIN

TO WINTERTIME AIR POLLUTION EPISODES ALONG THE NORTHERN COLORADO FRONT

RANGE. William D. Neff, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO

* Manuscript not available XXV

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 2th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence

page

P21.17 NETWORK DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS FOR FLOW IN COMPLEX TERRAIN. Keith W. Ayotte,CSIRO, Canberra, Australia

534 P21.18 BOUNDARY LAYER PROCESSES WITHIN THE MEXICO CITY BASIN AND THEIR IMPACT ON

SPATIAL OZONE PATTERNS. PART 2: DISPERSION SIMULATIONS. Jerome D. Fast, PNNL,Richland, WA; and S. S. Zhong and J. C. Doran

536 P21.19 A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THERMALLY-DRIVEN CIRCULATIONS PRODUCED BY BASIN

TOPOGRAPHY. Stephan F. J. de Wekker, PNNL, Richland WA; and S. S. Zhong, J. D. Fast, and C.

D. Whiteman

SESSION 22: HETEROGENEOUS SURFACES

538 22.1 FLUX PROFILE RELATIONS OVER THE COASTAL SEA INCLUDING THE ROLE OF FETCH

LIMITED SURFACE WAVES. Gerald L. Geernaert, National Environmental Research Inst., Roskilde,Denmark

540 22.2 A CASE STUDY OF THE NEAR NEUTRAL COASTAL INTERNAL BOUNDARY LAYER GROWTH-

AIRCRAFT MEASUREMENTS COMPARED WITH DIFFERENT MODEL ESTIMATES. BirgittaKaellstrand, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden; and A.-S. Smedman

542 22.3 OBSERVATIONS OF THE COASTAL MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER IN THE

VICINITY OF POINT SUR. Kathleen A. Edwards, SIO, La Jolla, CA; and D. P. Rogers

544 22.4 BULK FORMULA AND AERODYNAMIC QUANTITIES. Jielun Sun, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO;and W. J. Massman and D. A. Grantz

546 22.5 WIND PROFILES AND MOMENTUM FLUXES IN THE LOWER NEUTRAL PBL OVER FLATHETEROGENEOUS TERRAIN. Job W. Verkaik, Wageningen Agricultural Univ., Wageningen, The

Netherlands

548 22.6 EFFECTS OF FOREST CLEARING CHARACTERISTICS ON WIND REGIMES: WIND TUNNEL AND

FIELD COMPARISON. Alberto L. Orchansky, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; and

M. D. Novak, R. Ketler, and R. S. Adams

550 22.7 INTRA-REGIONAL VARIABILITY OF MIXING HEIGHT DURING THE 1995 SOUTHERN OXIDANTSSTUDY NEAR NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE. Robert M. Banta, NOAA/ERL/ETL, Boulder, CO; and R.

T. McNider

551 22.8 BOUNDARY-LAYER PERTURBATIONS INDUCED BY SPATIALLY VARYING SURFACE FLUXES:AN OBSERVATIONAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY. Shiyuan S. Zhong, PNNL, Richland, WA; and J.

C. Doran

553 22.9 SURFACE FLUXES AND ENERGY BALANCE IN AN ARID ECOSYSTEM. Lawrence E. Hipps, UtahState Univ., Logan, UT; and K. Ramalingam, W. P. Kustas, and J. H. Prueger

555 22.10 SOURCE AREA/FOOTPRINT MODELING OVER SPARSE SAVANNAH: HOW THE SENSORS

PERCEIVE THE TIGERBUSH. Hans Peter E. Schmid, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN; and C. Lloyd

557 22.11 EFFECTIVE ROUGHNESSES OVER SHERWOOD FOREST. M. Bottema, Univ. of Groningen,Haren, The Netherlands; and W. Klaassen and W. P. Hopwood

559 22.12 ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF AIRBORNE FLUX OBSERVATIONS IN THE SURFACEBOUNDARY LAYER OVER HETEROGENEOUS TERRAIN. P. H. Schuepp, McGill Univ.,Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, PQ, Canada; and S. S. Ogunjemiyo, R. L. Desjardins, J. I. MacPherson, andC. M. Mitic

*

Manuscript not available XXVI

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE


561 22.13 THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPERATIONAL DAYTIME SURFACE ENERGY BUDGET MODELUSING OKLAHOMA MESONET DATA. Todd M. Crawford, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and H.B. Bluestein

POSTER SESSION P22: HETEROGENEOUS SURFACES

P22.1 MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEADS UPON THE ATMOSPHERE AND THE SURFACE HEATBUDGET OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN. Steven K. Krueger, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and M.Zulauf

563 P22.2 PRESSURE PERTURBATIONS AROUND SHELTERBELTS: MEASUREMENTS AND MODELRESULTS. Eugene S. Takle, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA; and H. Wang, R. A. Schmidt, J. R. Brandle,I. V. Litvina, and R. L Jairell

565 P22.3 INVESTIGATIONS OF INTERNAL BOUNDARY LAYERS. Thomas Foken, German Weather Service,Lindenberg, Germany; and 0. O. Jegede

567 P22.4 THE 'LITFASS' PROJECT OF THE GERMAN WEATHER SERVICE. Thomas Foken, German

Weather Service, Lindenberg, Germany; and J. Neisser, S. H. Richter, W. Rosenow, U. Weisensee,E. Heise, E. Mueller and H. J. Herzog

569 P22.5 A SIMULATION STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG SURFACE HETEROGENEITY, HEAT

FLUXES AND BOUNDARY-LAYER TURBULENCE STRUCTURE. Jinmei Shen, Iowa State Univ.,Ames, IA; and E. S. Takle, R. W. Arritt, and H. Wang

571 P22.6 PARTICLE TRACKING VELOCIMETRY INVESTIGATION OF SEA BREEZE CIRCULATION. A.

Cenedese, Univ. of Rome, Rome, Italy; and M. Miozzi

* P22.7 EFFECTS OF SURFACE HETEROGENEITIES ON MESOSCALE CONVECTION. Vince Wong, Univ.of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; and M. Xue, F. Kong, Z. Huo, and B. Fiedler

* P22.8 DETERMINATION OF ZO AND D ACCOUNTING FOR FETCH: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS. C.Sue

B. Grimmond, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN; and H. P. E. Schmid

573 P22.9 HIGH-RESOLUTION REGIONAL CLIMATE SIMULATIONS USING RegCM2 WITH DIFFERENT

SCALE COUPLINGS OF SOIL, VEGETATION AND ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER

PROCESSES. Hao Wang, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa; and J. Shen and E. S. Takle

575 P22.10 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER VARIABILITY

OVER AN OCENIC THERMAL FRONT IN THE AZORES BASIN (SEMAPHORE EXPERIEMENT).B. Benech, Lab. d'Aerologie, CNRS, Toulouse, France; and B. H. Kwon, D. Lambert, P. Durand, A.

Druilhet, and H. Giordani

577 P22.11 SURFACE HETEROGENEITIES IN RELATION TO SEVERE THUNDERSTORM DEVELOPMENT

ALONG THE DRYLINE: A CASE STUDY. Carl E. Hane, NOAA/National Severe Storms Lab.,

Norman, OK; and H. B. Bluestein, T. M. Crawford, M. E. Baldwin, and R. M. Rabin

579 P22.12 SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF BOUNDARY-LAYER STRUCTURE AND THE ABSENCE OF

NON-CLASSICAL MESOSCALE CIRCULATIONS. W. J. Shaw, PNNL, Richland, WA; and J. C.

Doran, J. M. Hubbe, and J. C. Liljegren

581 P22.13 VALIDATION OF LOW-LEVEL TURBULENCE DERIVED LANDSCAPE ROUGHNESS ESTIMATES

USING WIND PROFILES OVER PARTLY FORESTED AREAS. M. Bottema, Univ. of Groningen,Haren, The Netherlands; and W. Klaassen and W. P. Hopwood

* P22.14 INHOMOGENEOUS FOOTPRINTS. S. Shen, Univ. du Quebec, Montreal, PQ Canada; and M. Y.

Leclerc

*

Manuscript not available xxvii

TABLE OF CONTENTS


page

session k: kansas field experiment 30th anniversary cemmemorative session

583 K.1 THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE KANSAS EXPERIMENT TO ABL MODELING. K. Shankar Rao,

NOAA/ARL/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN

585 K.2 COMPARISON OF KANSAS MEASUREMENTS WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION LARGE-EDDY

SIMULATION FIELDS. Samir Khanna and J. C. Wyngaard, Penn State Univ., University Park, PA

587 K.3 SURFACE EXCHANGES AND AIR-MASS MODIFICATION. David R. Fitzjarrald, Univ. at Albany,SUNY, Albany, NY

589 K.4 EXAMINATION OF KANSAS RELATIONSHIPS FOR TKE AND SCALAR BUDGETS OVER THE

OCEAN. James B. Edson, WHOI, MA; and C. W. Fairall

*

Manuscript not available xxviii

Documents

12th Symposium BoundaryLayers - GBV · 2008. 7. 15. · NCAR,BoulderCO;andC.J. Grund, S. D. Mayor, andW.M.Angevine 9 1.5 REMOTE MEASUREMENT OF VERTICAL TURBULENT TRANSPORT OF OZONE