Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11111?
ATTACHMENT 1
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES
Colder Associates AR30560U
ELIZABETHTOWN-HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER:ADDRESS:
PA
Water Supply Source;, (private WelQ Public Other(Please arde one) —————
If other, please describe: , ',• . ____ '.'•_______If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well wateK(t)iinkingXJVashing Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable use$) ,———•
2. Date well installed (if known): -3-1- (.*3. Installation company (driller): M^^rs ra-s.4 Well yield, in gallons per minute: 30*5. Well depth, in feet II*?.'6. Well diameter, in inches: £(*\**\ **&•*.«7. Water level below ground surface, in feet: ' ______''8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet \SQ9. Pump capacity. In gallons per minute; . . •
' ' . " . .»10. Depth of casing, in feet __11. Any additional information: ' ,
12. Location of well on property: frboY H«* t .~ Vs '
' '
.O'.
J
AR305605
I. 'EUZABETHTOWN
•'
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESHONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: VCe^-V i.
ADDRESS: -3*5-
Water Supply Source: CPrivateWelD Public Other(Please circle one) : • . ' • • • .
I f other, please describe: • • • ' • • - . • ' ___. ____ • . • " •If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well watersCPrmldng fWashing*) Agriculture Livestock Other
(Circle applicable uses; —7"—2. Date well installed (if known):3. Installation company (driller):4. Well yield, in gallons per minute: . A.*"5. Well depth, in feet « 3BS*6. Well diameter, In inches: . £*( WV -s JtUg»7. Water level below ground surface, in feet . ;8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet: _9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: _10. Depth of casing, in feet __11. Any additional information: :
•*•"X"«? -
12. Location of well on property:• '
AR305606
EUZABETHTOWN
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER; O, 2ADDRESS: v\
Vftr
. Water Supply Source: PrivateWelQ Public Other(Please circle one)
If other, please describe: • ___ ____ • ____ If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:
1. Use of well water Drinking ([Washing Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses)
' . • ' . • • ' • • ' . • ' . . • • . . • • ' . •2. Date well installed (if known): a— \<?-3. Installation company (driller):4 Well yield, in gallons per minute:5. Well depth, in feet6. Well diameter, in inches: (ftf(9*t.7. Water level below ground surface, in feet , ' .8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet . \«5o*9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: •10. Depth of casing in feet '• •
11. Any additional information:
12. Location of well on property: .KeV iO ; ** \£' • ' ' • . . . . / - . x •
. • ••• .-•• I—1
AR305607
v •••.
.", EUZABETHTOWN
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: R. F .
ADDRESS: i^v/cx \cr\e
Water Supply Source: CPrivateWelQ Public Other(Please circle one)
•i ' '-If other, please describe: /••.•'• _________;___•If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:
I. Use of well waterCpriAkJngj Washing ) Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses) ~ ""~—— ,
2. Date well installed (if known):3. Installation company (driller):4. Well yield, in gallons per minute:5. Well depth, in feet6. Well diameter, in inches: •''7. Water level below ground surface, in feet ., .8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet -zoo9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: ____10. Depth of casing, in feet ,.-.•" '•11. Any additional information:. .
» Vot v <N«»l.' \eO >-g!\c«»^ V r~s>**• >v., ^ .<o*ni>*\t
\OM
12. Location of well on property: • _-",• " " • ' " . .
• . •'••.; -'. " • • • : . . ' *•' i i
flR305608
ELIZABETHTOWNHOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: y\\f. «*tsADDRESS: 3/7 V«A«A'_
Water Supply Source: CgivateWeJT) Public Other(Please circle one)
If other, please describe: - ' '• ••'_____'.'•''.''.'•!• _________If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well water Drinking (Washing) Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses) ———
2. Date well installed (if known):3. Installation company (driller):4 Well yield, in gallons per minute:5. Well depth, in feet
6. Wen diameter, in inches: kVsVeg)7. Water level below ground surface, in feet ______8* Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet ins9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: ;______.10. Depth of casing in feet _11. Any additional information: .
Cooe^
12. Location of well on property: . ' ' . - . x
ELIZABETHTOWN
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: VV
ADDRESS:, . "I <\' \/ -A*r*
Water Supply Source: (Private Wejlp Public Other(Please circle one)
If other, please describe: " '• • . . " ' . • • • •• - • .. - -If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well water: Drinking (Washing) Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses) ' T — . •' ' • '
2. Date well Installed (if known):3. Installation company (driller):
' ' • '• . .- ,
4 Well yield, in gallons per minute: VS
5. Well depth, in feet6. Well diameter, in inches: : L* (p>\rc7. Water level below ground surface, in feet ____8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet \OO*9. Pump capacity; in gallons per minute: • -_____10. Depth of casing, in feet '.___11. Any additional Information:
v>3e\\
12. Location of well on property:
flR3056IO
ELIZABETHTOWNHOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: U,ADDRESS: 5\
Water Supply Source: CrMvateWelD Public Other(Please circle one)
If other, please describe: - •____________' • •If you circled "Private Well" abpve, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well water rmidng) Washing Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses) ——-—-
2. Date well installed (if known):3. Installation company (driller)::4 Well yield, in gallons per minute:5. Well depth, in feet
6. Well diameter, in inches:7. Water level below ground surface, in feet8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute:10. Depth of casing, in feet11. Any additional information:' '
12. Location of well on property? t %+ji.' . *
ELIZABEIHTOWN' ' - •. '•. \,
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: T. Mus*e.r»ADDRESS:
Water Supply Source: ffrrivateWelQ Public Other(Please circle one) •
If other, please describe: '••'' ••; • ' _____ . _____ • ________If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:
1. UseofweUwater;( riiu ng!Y aThin£) Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses) — ; ——
2. Date well installed (if known): <g:-\«?-«tfe *3. Installation company (driller):4 Well yield, in gallons per minute: ; \o
5. Well depth, in feet :6. Well diameter, in inches: -,**'C<£w\7. Water level below ground surface, in feet '• •'8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet VT.g'*'9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: .' •10. Depth of casing, in feet11. Any additional information:
o*gO f .
12. Location of weU on property:• • . - . • . ' ' • • • ' " - . • x
AR30S-6I2
EUZABEIHTOWNHOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERtYOWNER: -.. 5'W«e ______ j
ADDRESS: I'V \JfcWU \V,*a
PIV
Water Supply Source: Private Well Public Other(Please circle one) . :
If other, please describe: _ ______ ; _______ < • _____ j ___If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well water: Drinking Washing Agriculture Livestock Other. (Circle applicable uses) • • '
2. Date well installed (if known): ________________3. Installation company (driller): . • ' •;'4 Well yield, in gallons per minute: . • •5. Well depth, in feet , __. _______6. Well diameter, in inches: '7. Water level below ground surface, in feet ___ • • ' -.8.- Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet ___ __________9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: ; • ; - • .10. Depth of casing, in feet . .11. Any additional information: : ,. , * ^
fi i*<* ~ \ /Cs T VV»
12. Location of well on property:
vy
flR3056!3
EUZABETHTOWNHOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: & \CVsc
ADDRESS: q\ \\T02..
Water Supply Source: CPrivateWelO Public Other(Please circle one)
If other, please describe: ••.••• .: •'" ____- ________If you circled "Private Well* above, please answer the following questions:1. Useof wellwater:(bri king (wishingj Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses) "
2. Date well installed (if known):3. Installation company (driller):4 Well yield, in gallons perminute: *7
5. WeU depth, in feet ZIP6. Well diameter, in inches: 4" (foe g./»Cc<-
7. Water level below ground surface, in feet •8. Depth of pump below ground surface, in feet -2.00 (?\9. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: _________10. Depth of rasing, in feet11. Any additional information:
12. Location of well on property:
AR30561U
EUZABETHTOWN
HOME WELL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PROPERTY OWNER: U*A\ ft ,»ADDRESS:
Water Supply Source: (Private WelT) Public Other(Please circle one) —————
If other, please describe: ' . _____•.-••'' '-.-•"If you circled "Private Well" above, please answer the following questions:1. Use of well water: Drinking (Washing) Agriculture Livestock Other(Circle applicable uses)
2, Date well installed (if known): l*\S \ (yVew»s o'-c.UJ >3. Installation company (driller): - : ':4 Well yield, in gallons per minute: . •: -5. Well depth, in feet PS6. Well diameter, in inches: ; ____jLl!_____£iiLfe7. Water level below ground surface, in feet • •8. Depth of pump below ground surface, In feet \~*>o (tgpVc 2-ir*.;59. Pump capacity, in gallons per minute: \<£ (9«.«- .fe. Pv10. Depth of casing, in feet . •• ____'m11. Any additional information:
. O
12. Location of well on property:
C-fD»)A
HR3056I5
ATTACHMENT2
WATER WELL INVENTORY REPORTS(Obtained from the Topographic andGeologic Survey section of PADER)
Colder Associates .-.««-• r irAR3056I6
CH Endnx.mtttt-1 Betouir ' : TOPOGRAPHIC AMP GEOLOGIC SURVEY W-1-W.I fcmnto-R«P«tof «ci USE ONLY
'~tT I Phy»iO. P™»;. ——— _U.S. B*si»___ — .Topo.^ • )m4»nmAct «*«______ ————— ——— i ———— _*QU«-
g 7(CIRCLE ONE)coipwa. **fc tatfnL cm*fCtRCLtONE)
.NO:.—VM—————,——dtpfeCAtmicai/Bfeiogicai natysitjnadt; __Y«K___Na_
.ft.
Otpnt » Badnxk^Jy_^____a Landtorm, al Sit*I———————;—•———L^^temcLE ONE»Surface___OfflCt USI ONLY
PI.ni»ii
WrtHLOg «f3« — TI
/. -» A/
__________ . .. — £•*•i VF! m 1 ^W >
U>«atE__a(TM.vi-v« /~ > «~-Tttl YWd "-*«' n»«<g5Sg» pu—M* (CIRCLt ONE)
ff.
SKETCH MAP
Efl-TOS-W REV. OT 9 MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
^i»partnt*nl of Emtronmtntel RMOUttn TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY —......-. - - n , "~*•———' HBB B PvOivfy n*Vp _TtT i
St CBL-'-"—'.Ut—————:—;———»-«"f ; ; '; l nytla Piw..——_U& BMto
~. _^^ _ _ (CIRCLE ONEt "Owntnhlp——tsb<>,n aM. MM-. -_» i
7 t:— **—*-
Olt» Drtl-a mnnm year
Watar Lvxl Bator* T*M ______________«.Lav<lit End of Tttl_____________«.
'»• V7———BP-*id Method—————» «OfjSZr> (konpM (CIRCLE ONE)________h.
Langtn ol TM« X K.
ER-TGS-15 REV. 07/63
P-*> *» B**nai >sr • undton» at Sit*
|S>gtac«_J_.0
D«p«»
Log
W But.—OFncaug ONLY] -»__ _ 3*"'*' 9r f-f&WASU.——. ^ n «. ' ^ V>T !?4/ 3 >»/x>4/7V / e<7~
SKETCH MAP >«<>««» •(«!» ne't. m>nrr.:-t
MAIL 1ST-COPV TO PA. GSOL
Department cl Eiwlronmeiiui B»»ourcet TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Waiw. WtB in y Acpvt
Wiluaik W*M Locitton OirvcttoraiCmCLEONE) _ ^
Casing Maiart*) —Watt «-"—
Uv*t« End e* ?•«
TOPOGRAPHIC AND OEOLOCIC SURVEYD«y«tra«nt ct Enftoonm«nU1
Buin ' omcC USE ONLY!
(CWCLEONE)r, »e». »cii«m«. x. aumimnn »•»
Wen GroutedOat* DriUod innntn yur
»• «*«i e*fon Teal
T*,. Yield MetttodDrawdown
SKETCH MAP OMiuu'rouw net MWMCTOT Kf«ou. «r>un-w etmminn r Qb>w fT:.ll*rf'*rM"- '"' "ER-TGS-15 REV. 07/63
MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Department ot Enrlronm«frt»l Resources ____________TOPOGRAPHIC. AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Wg1ef WejOFFICE USE ONLY
Physio. Pro*Aquifer
We* Log• Mncmmei
WeU Sit*—Township ft. Landtorm *t Sit*ONE)
Addresser P.O. Bo»Bearing Zon*a(t|
c————————————————.P*e«>.-..cmct USE ONLY)ixuaii. urigieeii, nod.(CmCLSONE)
Wei GroutedD*t*Drittd monm; .«-•WMrLMlB*fOf*T**t
U«*J at End ol Tew
-rtl Wl "ItTfinrf
1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ~ .5& sH&V £ """•-• I££1 t- ^ - :
r D«p*rtm«nt of Ei»ffcoom*nM R*MUitt«t _____ TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY
-"W»t« W*|
From ~
' undlomi at SJt*ONEj
M own*r» *ddr*t* . em*t mm *•) sit* *ddr*a indKti* on t*»*n*. Dapm to Water B**rmg Zone* P).
Wrttwo Wet Loetticrt CH
CnemleabBiologleal Anaiyii* made Y*K____NQ!WeROapUi Development narn* (M aoe-cable
Casing material — steelottl*f
ICIRCLEONBWe* Finrsn eSr* "c-facf««». MfivmdmonMwe« Qrouied ' Yes.Date Drilled montn w...Water Uvel Bettx* Test ___ ______ »
Lev*) UJEndol Tcst
Test Yield MeinodDrawdown
SKETCH MAP »die*i* -:>-•* no't •• •»c t*> .wir>v rvtiu**Length ot Test. nu'4iii*.r_in • •• ---.------- - -— --- - --"S--S REV i »
AtKI W*~< T "-——w—•- ••- -••«_•• i rr. -.- • *v-w*- V--W.I.V*. t,- T T •«» *t _ ny - - .. Ou»rr«» t'Ojet (» -;«a r: »• Hire » mow du c»e-i MI
fl K O U D 0 I 3 MAIL 1ST CC=Y TO W. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
«paftmeM ct Enrlronmen-l RCTOUTCTS_____ TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Watef Wtfl mwntofy ReportWctiLog
'FVom — Te.- OFFICE USE ONLY,.
id KM* I Township/
.ewnefs Mdr*u k ether than *M *lte address Indicate en reverse Depth lo Wtwr BMring Zones (1(CmCLEONE)tm*a ewt. Mm. etwnty(CIRCLE ONE)
ft. Casing Unfltheating Oia.
puttie. Casing mneriat - sieei.
ryp* Construction: Rotary. Cable. Oth«r
«a«0mit*d—-*•*.MM Drilled month r"'Mt*r U«*l Before '"•
SKETCH MAP lrieica>eieut*iie >nterieei»ne.aattait.*t»<rtri«».«eme)er«
MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ER-TGS-15 REV.
TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY
lysls made: ___ V«s:.__No_
HCth 01 T«St.
VTGS-15 REV. 07/E3MAIL 1ST COPY T.C PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEV
o, Environment* Resource._________ TOPOGRAPHIC ANJ> GEOLOGIC SURVEY———— W..*c W*. to-»to~ Report.,v . C FWE USE ONLY •• -.,,... t, - • .~v.~. .*.-. •$' | jjyu,,,, yn,,
* ? •<" ' Landlorm at Srte'a*, f—— n. . _ _ _ ONEJ
II owr r eiwess i* other tnan *•« site address indicate on reverse. Depth tc, Wster Bearing(DRCLI ONE)convee. IIM. tMeret ceuny(CIRCLE ONE)
CnamicaUBiologleal Anal«»m*dK Y*K"
ft. CasJng length
Casing material - steWTptastic. Casing mawri*t - steM.otnerType Construction: Rotary. Ctbte. "*»r£t.
tClRCLE ONEJiom<l.
Well Grouted———Yes.D*t* Drilled month yearVra!*T.U»*)B*lor*T<
SKETCHUAP indicate ram* no .1
«i«»o*~ let"-TClHOnr IMpOn £U**.*. ..«.-..> >«rtfntfH oEnrrofirn»nt«l BMeorctft TOPOGrUPHJCAND GEOLOGIC SURVEY
i-jr--:-» &«t>»y/£S>ff<'.'• C-rffSi'
Depth to *e*er.Bearin(CIRCLE ONE)
(CIRCLE ONE)nouunr. imgtMik. MOO. MMuken aemt*.
ONE)
II wa DiameterCasing Lartath
Casing material -> stML
rp* Construction: Rotary. Caw*. OtherRCLEONE)
e* F'ft'VU—-Sap rwejatw rioriito/iie•H Gn>uted___Y*s.it* Drilled month yearliar Uv*l Selor* Test
co»"»l bncf« 't»'o«« *K a- KI/» to mew oi*t«ncM t»nw«n. IMw iMWrn. (mlWM:ngth el Test.
MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ER-TGS-'! =£. 6/86
Department cf EmrrronmentBl Resources _______ TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY »„„_.„._ .__. „.wmer we* tnwnlory ResortOFRCE USE ONLYSt «2Co._ ——— *-«S*Q. ——— Act
Depth to Bedrock
i, n ewner* •**•*! .ether than <^i sfteMdrea Indicate en IWVWM.i ___ (CIRCLE ONE)
' Cnemiceir&otoslcat.Analysis made: Yes. WraH DftODl
Casing UngthCasing OU,
ft. CnlngungthCasing OU.
Casing material -cme>
Casing material - ateet.
Type Construction: Rotary. Cable. Other(CIRCLE ONE)
Date Drifted month yearWaur Ln*l Before Test
t*v*l
Te»l Yield Method
SKETCH IMP
MAIL 1ST COPY
TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEYDtMrtmwrl of EmtreniMfttit A**ourcM
V JGIKLEONE)«w_i>j£Bc iiwr. MWe«
Addrwsftr P.O. Box
B ewner* *ddr*ss to ether then w*o *n* *ddr*«s torjcn* en(CmCLEONE)
Oevatopinerit name
Casing material — *weiplastic. , ejrter
Type, Construction: Aotary. Cattle. Other,(CIRCLE ONE)
Wen *
OriMed month yearLevel Before Test
SKETCH MAP me*ew rcuit no'* i e->fenei e»T>»i*r.«» SUM)*! -:--i •••;»•• -.-»>, •»aio't«.=s* etc
MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLGICAL SURVEY
TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Water Wei bnemory ReportOFFICE USE ONLY
JTOSO..
Env!———tntrt Re*ource.
Wen SIM I Townshio/
ner* address is other than we* sit* address Indicate on reverse.(CIRCLE ONE)
OwnershiB__,ghpe«». eon**, iwe. *rter*l e~rt»- (CIRCLE ONE)
Mut»*. bn(
Sattwaur zonesAnalysis made: Yes
Weft-Depth X*5<5——ft. We»Oi*m*W De.elopmem name
Casing LangtMCasing Oia,Casing material — stee).plastic, other
Type Construction: Rotary. CabM. Other
Casing material —otn*r
We*Wen Grouted———Yea,DawDrtted month yearWatar L*«*l Betor* Test
vs&gg*0"*SKETCH MAP Weeteroutera m.-rieeJ-ns.wax rj.urehee.
Mine*, enooes. ntfneos. ew. Be aura w ine«
.•!«•.•• .-..-; ::.-i.~.- ..V;/-«.'--., -j_- i..-r-•••r'V-CJ.*..TOPOGRAPHIC ANO GEOLOGIC SURVEYDepartmeM ot EmironmenUI Resource*
|Pa. B*sln _OFFlCg USE ONV
ChemictVBIologicaUknalysis mad*;Wen Depth
Casing Materiel —WeU Oiameter_2
Wen Grouted ___ YeeDate DrrilMd mnnm rear
water Lev* Betor* Test
Length ol Test———f.——————«r —————;———— mm. SKETCH MAP ****» na» no..en Tr»«. .r nn. _. .. ' eu«"«e. O"a{ft WIIOKI « a. iE*-TGS-15REV. 07/e3 MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA GSCWOGlCAL SURVJEY
Department et Environmental Resource* _____ TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Water Wen Inventory Report.
Fn»- — fo
Bastii _OFrTCE USE ONLY)
water Level Betor* TestLevel «tEmt-cf Test
field _fest Yield Methoa_____*
MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL SURVEYlength et TeatER-T'—'-IS REV. 07/83
jjepwtment •! Ern*onmental Resource* " * " ;— ~ - VoPOGRAPHIC"Arib"OEOLOGJC SURVEY " " '*"""*""""*'''w',£'*i'!?liHti*ri*tf#l " **
Tc
[Pa. B«in__OmCE USE OM.YJ
3hemle*l«iologicat Aralysis made: ____V*s:___No_
Jaslng M*t*rial —Well Diameter
nnieh j-jj-ICIRCLE ONE!
mnmn »«., g "
•en Yield Methodirewdown
«,mDM rcmCLE ONE)
SKETCH MAP I>*««.'«M net"R-TGS-15 REV 07/63 ' ' etfii-w. enepei re-iOMi. eit *. tan
MAIL 1ST COPY TO PA. GEOLOGICAL
APPENDIX G
EUZABETHTOWN LANDFILL CONTENTS(SCA Submission to USEPA - October 8,1992)
AR305625
Waste Management of North America, Inc. .Normeast Region Office . 'Environmental Management Department •1121 Bordentown Road . . :MorrisviHa. Pennsylvania 19067 •215/736-2000 'FAX 215/736-0518 .
.' • " •• ' • ' • • ' . ' • . • • 'October 8,1992 Federal Express
US. Environmental Protection Agency, Region HI .B41 Chestnut Building . •Philadelphia, PA 19107Attn: Ms, Sherry GaBagher (3HW23)
Sub]: Ettubethtown Undflfl ContentsDear Sherry: :Pursuant to EPA's July 8,1992 conditional approval of the WF3 Work Plan for EHzabeenclosed you win find the following: V
1. SCA's Investigation into Discrete Non-Domestic Waste Disposal Areas of theEOzabethtown Landfffl (Enclosure 1).
2. Qualitative Assessment of the Presence or Absence of Hot Spots -ESzabethtown Landfffl,October 1992 (Enclosure 2).
The above findings, in conjunction with the review of aerial photographs, documented site viste, andthe exhumations discussed in Section &2.1 of the Work Plan, in our opinion, suggest that no discretenon-MSW disposal areas exist at Efizabethtown LandfBL .R is SCA's opinion, excluding any contradictory Wbrmation yet to be obtained, that additional effortsto identify and characterize discrete non-Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) dfeposal areas are unwarranted.Consequently, SCA believes that dfecrete non-MSW dsposal areas should not be considered hi thedevelopment of remedial alternatives to be evaluated In the Feasibility Study.Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning the above;
• • - ' ' . • • ' ' •* •
Representing SCA Services of PA,
Glen A. SchuteProject Manager
Kcnard C. KarrRemecSal Project CoordinatorGAS:RCK:lcv
•Enclosures' ' "•• : -.'-.. • • •••'•. _ . . • _ . • f'
AR305626
ENCLOSURE 1
sex's INVESTIGATION INTODISCRETE NON-DOHESTIC WASTE DISPOSAL AREAS
AT THE ELIZABETHTOWN LANDPILI.
EGA is providing the following report in response to Attachment Iof EPA's Notice of Conditional Approval of the RI/FS Work Plan forthe Elizabeth-own Landfill ("the Landfill") dated July 8, 1992.Specifically, this report provides SCA's findings regarding theLandfill contents and its conclusions that no discrete non-domesticwaste disposal areas exist at the Landfill.This report provides evidence as suggested by EPA's comments topage 20, paragraph 5 of the RI/FS Work Plan for the Landfill.
Reviev ef Interviews vith Former Landfill Workers
After discussions with the Assistant Regional Counsel for thissite, EGA determined that the only interviews of former Landfillworkers to be reviewed were the unsworn statements of Harold Shank("Shank11) and Jay Myers ("Myers") taken by TechLaw Incorporated forEPA on November 3, 1988. SCA's review of those unsworn statementsfound very little information regarding disposal areas in generalat the Landfill and no information showing discrete disposal areasfor specific types of waste. The only portions of the unswornstatements relating to these issues are:
Shank Statement, Pages 24 and 25t Shank, when asked if therewere any specific areas for disposal of specific wastes, statedthat "It was all put together.11 .' «
Shank Statement, Pages €5 through 68: Shank explained thatthe oils and chemicals in drums generated by one company werepoured on the ground and burnt at the Landfill. ,
Myers Statement, Pages 21 through 23: Myers stated that emptydrums that had been used to collect trash did come to the Landfilland were .disposed "in the hole".None of the information gathered by TechLaw Incorporated providesany evidence of discrete non-domestic waste disposal areas.
Additional Interviews vith Former Landfill Workers
SCA has conducted additional interviews with Shank, Myers and 'JamesWay ("Way") in order to determine the Landfill's disposalpractices. The following summaries provide the results of thoseinterviews. _ •
Shank Interview: Shank recalled that the only drummed wastesaccepted at the Landfill were from two companies. Shank statedthat liquids from one company were used as a fuel source to bum
AR305627
excess brush and trees at the Landfill and that full drums wouldnot have been disposed directly into the Landfill. The burning ofthe excess brush and.trees always occurred in one specific area andusually took place when it was raining or in the winter months.Shank or Way would empty the contents of the drums on the pile ofbrush and trees and then the pile would be ignited. Shankexplained that the empty drums would be crushed and disposed in theactive area of the Landfill..Regarding the drummed wastes from another company, Shank statedthat this waste consisted of scrapings of undercoating drippingsfrom the floor of the company's spray booth. He stated that thiswaste was in a solid form and that it was placed in 55-gallon drumsby the company. Shank explained that these drums were disposed inthe active areas of the Landfill at the time of disposal. Shankstated that there was no designated disposal area for these drums,which were the only drums of waste disposed at the Landfill.
Myers Interview: Myers stated that the only liquids that cameto the Landfill were those contained in 55-gallon drums from onecompany and laboratory egg wastes generated by another company.When asked if any trash or waste was burned at the Landfill, Myersstated that he was not aware of any such occurrences. Myers didrecall that there were a couple of fires at the Landfill caused bythe disposal of hot ashes there. .
' • • :•.' .'. • . - / •" . :way Interview: Way worked at the 'Landfill as both a truck
driver and equipment operator while the Landfill was operated byUnited Disposal, Macke Corporation and SCA. When asked aboutdrummed waste accepted by the Landfill, Way stated that the only55-gallon drums that he were accepted by the Landfill weregenerated by two companies. •Regarding, the drummed wastes from one company, Way stated that hewould pick up between 1 and 4 55-gallon drums of liquid wasteseach Friday. Way explained that these wastes would be stored nearthe pit burn area used to burn trees that had been cut down at theLandfill as well as excess brush and wooden trash. He stated that,at least once every other month, he would empty the drums in theburn pit, ignite and burn the trees and, brush, and then bury theempty drums in the active portion of the Landfill. Way furtherstated that the burning of the trees and brush would usually occurin the early morning and preferably when it was raining. Whenasked if the drums containing these liquid wastes were everdisposed directly in the Landfill, Way stated that these liquidwastes were enlv used as. a fuel source to burn the trees and brushin the burn pit and were not disposed in the Landfill itself.Regarding th.e 55-gallon drums from the other company, Way statedthat he would pick up between 1 and 7 drums each Friday from this
' ' ' ' '
RR305628
company. Way stated that these drums contained solidified driedpaint from the company's spray booth and floor scrapings. Wayexplained that the drums would be disposed in the active area ofthe Landfill at the time of disposal. Way further stated thatthere was no designated area of disposal for these drums at theLandfill. Way explained that, around 1970, the company beganplacing these drums directly into the United Disposal; roll-offcontainer at its plant. Way stated that these drums would be mixedin with other general plant trash generated by the company anddisposed in the active area of the Landfill at the time ofdisposal. Way stated that the drums were the only drums containingwaste that were disposed in the Landfill.. . - • • - • •
f ' . ' . " - - ' • • '
Since both Shank and Way stated that there was a specific area usedto burn trees and excess brush at the Landfill, SCA accompaniedShank and Way to the Landfill and asked them to point out the burnpit area. This area is shown on Attachment I to this report.
. . . " . . - . , ' . i • .Comprehensive Review of All Landfill RecordsAs previously indicated to EPA, the only documents relating topossible activities at the Landfill are the "customer cards" and"customer list" that were attached to SCA's December. 27, 1988supplemental response to EPA's Section 104(e) information request.As stated in that response and as a result of an additional review>of those documents (the only known Landfill documents), there is noinformation available to indicate the nature and quantity of wastesdisposed in the Landfill nor is there information regardingdisposal locations for those wastes. • .
ConclusionsThe evidence described above clearly shows that drummed wastes fromonly two companies were accepted by the Landfill. This evidencefurther shows that the liquid wastes from one were used as a fuelto ignite trees and excess brush that were burned at the Landfill.It also shows that the drums from the other were always disposed inthe active area of the Landfill and not in any specificallydesignated area. The evidence also found that, no other liquidwastes were accepted at the Landfill.The combination of these facts and the results of SCA'sinvestigation have found that there are n_> discrete non-domesticdisposal areas at the Landfill.
• " . ' " . - * ~
Attachment
AR30562.9
APPROXIMATE LANDFILL BOUNDARY* * . ; • * . . » ^ _ J *
_--;'." V •--. . . . ( . . - .
' . • . '
/ !.!•>
LOCATION OP BURN AREA
LANDFILL I AttachmentAssociates
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESENCEOR ABSENCE OF HOT SPOTSEUZABETHTOWN LANDFILL
Submitted to:- . • , • ; . - ! . - ;SCA Services of Pennsylvania, Inc.
1121 Bordentown RoadMomsville, Pennsylvania
DISHUBUnON:
2 Copies - SCA Services of Pennsylvania/ Inc.2 Copies -Colder Associates tic.
October 1992 ./ Project No.: .-923-6053
'AR30563I
Golder Associates Inc.305 Fellowship Rood. Suite 200Mt. Laurel. NJ USA 08054
October 7, 1992 Project No.: 923-6053
SCA Services, Inc.1121 Bordentown RoadMonisville, PA 19067 ,
Attn: Mr. GlenSchultz
RE: EUZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RI/FSHOT SPOTS SUBMISSION TO USEPA
Gentlemen: ...
Please find enclosed two (2) complete sets of Golder Associates Inc., QualitativeAssessment of the Presence or Absence of Hot Spots for the above project. It isunderstood that SCA I Services of Pennsylvania, Inc. will be incorporating this intotheir submission to USEPA on this matter.
Should you have any Questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.
Ge&f ey-RTForrest, CP.Eng.Associate
GRF/bjtA:QAOCT.CL
flR3Q5632OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA. CANADA. GERMANY, HUNGARY. ITALY. SWEDEN. UNITED KINGDOM. UNITED STATES
October 1992 -i- 923-6053
i , 'TABLE OF CONTENTSCover Letter
Table of Contents i
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 SITEfflSTORY/BACKGROUNb 2
3.0 APPROACH 3
40 ASSESSMENT 441 Introduction 442 Solubility Levels Versus Concentration 443 Temporal Trends 544 Air Quality • 6
5.0 SUMMARY 8
REFERENCES 9
LIST OF TABLES In OrderFollowing
Table 1 Solubility/Concentration Comparison Page 9
1JST OF FIGURES. ' • i -
Figure 1 Landfill Layout and WeU Location Information' - - ' , . " '
1 1 ' ' . - ' . ' . ' • ' < •
IJST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Temporal Trend Curves
Golder Associates „.._W30S633
October 1992 '•-!-•' 923-6053 >
1.0 INTRODUCTION .,r i •
At the request of SCA Services of Pennsylvania, Inc. (SCA), Golder Associates Inc. ""(Golder) has carried out a qualitative assessment of die historic site data to assesswhether specific disposal area "hot spots" are indicated at the ElizabethtownLandfilL This assessment has been conducted using a knowledge of site historyand the physical and chemical properties and temporal trend curves of chemicals
, detected in groundwater samples. • • . .
In the context of this study, the term "hot spots" has been used to describe discretenon-domestic waste disposal areas utilized landfill operations. It is assumed thatthese areas would result in concentrated soiirces of contamination.
The indication of the presence or absence of hot spots at this site is considered tobe an important issue since an indication that hot spots may be present couldinfluence the scope of remedial alternatives evaluated in the Feasibility Study ofthe site. \
Golder AssociatesAR3Q563U
October 1992 -2- 923-6053
2.0 SITE HISTORY/BACKGROUND
• : •'•'• -'.- • • • ' :•'•'••'• • '' ' ' - " • .Information indicates that initial activities at the site occurred at some time around1960 to 1961 and involved excavation of sand and gravel from a shallow pit
' J • ' • - ' 'located in the south central portion of the landfill. It is assumed that excavationcontinued down to of just below the level of the groundwater table in the area.
Shortly thereafter, landfilling operations commenced and waste disposal and fillingactivities were reportedly carried out by the area fill method. Riling by trenchmethods was believed to have been used for the northern part of the landfillwhere the water table was not very deep. Available information indicates that noliner or leachate collection system was constructed below the fill materials priorto or during the operation of the landfill.
Landfilling activities continued until 1973 when the landfill was closed by PADERpursuant to a Consent Decree. At the time of closure, the landfill wasrectangularly shaped and approximately 16 acres in size (Figure 1). The northern(presently capped) area comprised about 12 acres and the southern (uncapped)portion comprised about 4 acres, including an area of about 2 acres which was theold sand and gravel pit
Golder Associates
October 1992 . -3- . 923-6053
3.0 APPROACH•••'-. ' -. ••-•• ... '. . :. .
Given the site setting discussed previously in Section 2 and a potential for hotspots acting as concentrated sources) of groundwater contamination, Colder1*assessment concentrated on evaluating existing information which may provideevidence for or indicators of the existence of hot spots.
) - ' ' ' .. ' *
At the Elizabethtown Landfill, essentially this involved the following:
(i) Determining what wells in close proximity to; the landfill wouldmost likely monitor groundwater contamination sourced from hotspots within the landfill
(ii) Comparing detected concentration levels of contaminants to levelswhich could be expected if the contaminants were being sourcedfrom a nearby hot spot Recent research (see Section 43) suggeststhat solubility levels may be used as an indication of die presence (orabsence) of a source comprising free phase liquids. At this site, thehistorical groundwater data suggest? that free phase liquids, ifpresent; would most likely comprise the non-chlorinated compoundsbenzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BTEX) or heavierchlorinated solvents (Table 1). :
(iii) Inspecting temporal trend curves, in conjunction with overallconcentration levels, to determine whether any consistent increase
- or decrease in trend is apparent and evaluating what such trendsindicate.
(iv) Assessing results of air quality monitoring at the site, to determineif volatile organics have been detected in air in localized areas or inhigh concentrations, which could suggest the present of hot spotscomprised of volatile liquids in the landfill materials above or on thewater table.
A discussion of the approach and assessment are provided in the followingsections of this report
ftR305636
October 1992 -4- 923-6053
40 ASSESSMENT
41 Introduction
Monitoring wells have been strategically placed geologically and downgradienthydraulically to intercept groundwater potentially impacted by landfilledmaterials. The results of analyses of groundwater in the monitoring wells (seeFigure 1) closest to the landfill show that these wells are most likely to provideindications of the presence or absence of hot spots.
Wells ED5R, ED9R, ED10, and ED13 are the downgradient monitoring wells closestto the southern (former gravel pit) area and wells ED2R, ED8R, ED11 and to alesser extent ED12 are those closest to the northern portion of the landfill. Thesewells are located to monitor groundwater quality at distances from 50 feet to 400'.feet downgradient from potential hot spot areas.
Temporal trend curves for selected chlorinated and non-chlorinated volatileorganic compounds (VOCs) detected in these wells have been plotted and arepresented in Appendix A. An assessment of these graphs is presented in Section4.3 below.
42 Solubility Levels Versus Concentration
An indication of the possible presence or absence of hot spots containing aconcentrated source of a certain chemical may be obtained by comparing thehighest detected concentration of the chemical against its aqueous solubility. Ithas been documented by Kueper et al (1992) and EPA (1992) that as a general ruleof thumb, if detected concentrations in groundwater exceed 1 percent to 10 percentof the solubility level for that particular chemical, then free phase liquid may beacting as a nearby source for the dissolved phase chemical.
Golder AssociatesAR305637
October 1992 -5- 923-6053
Table 1 presents a Solubility/Concentration comparison for major volatile organiccompounds encountered in the downgradient wells adjacent to the landfill andone upgradient well at the site (maximum detected concentrations only areshown). An inspection of this table clearly shows that maximum detectedconcentration for any of the chemicals are below the respective 1 percent solubilitylevel by one (1) to five (5) orders of magnitude.
• • • ' \ • ' . . - . . . . . . - > •
On die basis of these data, collected over the past 7 years, it is considered highlyunlikely that free phase liquids are present in hot spots at the site.
43 Temporal Trends
An evaluation of temporal trend curves may also provide a guide to the presenceor absence of hot spots. Iri general, a decrease in the concentration of chlorinatedand non-chlorinated VOCs in various matrices can be anticipated with time dueto their volatility, as long as there is no additional input from source areas (Le., ahot spot). ; " ' . ! '
Non-validated historical data from 1986 to 1992 have been used to compiletemporal trend curves of concentration versus time for chlorinated and non-chlorinated VOCs detected in groundwater samples from monitoring wells closeto the landfill (Appendix A). For the purposes of this study, it is consideredacceptable to use these data to make a qualitative assessment of the indication ofhot spots at the site.
- \ . - . • .Inspection of temporal trend curves plotted for the monitoring wells close to thelandfill reveals that all graphs show some degree of variability, but in general, theconcentrations of VOCs in the groundwater are gradually decreasing from thealready existing low concentrations. Of the trends plotted (see Appendix A) forthe chlorinated and non-chlorinated VOCs on a per well basis, 14 of the plots
Gotder Associates &R305638
October 1992 -6- 923-6053
show general decreasing trends, 4 show general upwards trend, and 5'either showa cyclical or a non-distinguishable trend.
For those plots where an overall decreasing trend is observed, It is probable thatthese plots may reflect a diminishing or depleting source that is not a concentratedsource. Given the low concentration levels, plots exhibiting no trend or cyclicaltrend may represent a constant, but not concentrated source. For those plotswhich show a general increasing trend, given the overall low concentration levels,and rate;of increase in concentration, it is unlikely that these graphs indicate a hotspot source area (see Section 42 above). .
As a consequence of the above, it is Golder's professional judgement that theassessment of temporal trend curves together with overall low concentration levelsshow that it is unlikely that specific hot spots could be the source of the chemicalsin the groundwater adjacent to the landfill.
• ' • : . . . ' ' • : • • ' • . ' • " ' • . • • " ' ' ' . - ' •4.4 Air Quality
. The presence or absence of hot spots may also be indicated by results of air qualitymonitoring. For highly volatile organic compounds known to be present ingroundwater at the site (Table 1), }t would be expected that these compounds bedetected in air quality monitoring as a product of volatilization from hot spots.
As stated in the RI/FS Work Plan, air monitoring with an HNu at the site duringvarious previous investigations including the FIT HI investigation, the Phase EHeld Investigation Program, and during die installation of die gas extractionsystem indicated no volatilization through the cap. In addition; during theconstruction of die gas extraction wells and trenches through the landfill for thegas header pipes, no substantial readings were obtained with an .HNu above theHealth and Safety Plan Action Level of 0.05 ppm.
Golder Associates ^•'( --.flB3056.39
October 1992 -7- 923-6053
Thus, the consistent non-detection of volatiles in air suggests that concentrated. . . . ' . . i . .
sources of volatile organic compounds are not present at the site.
Golder AssociatesHR.3056I4Q
October 1992 -8- 923-6053
. 5.0 SUMMARY
In conclusion, as discussed in this qualitative, assessment the following factorssuggest that there is no indication of concentrated sources or hot spots at theElizabethtown Landfill:
• • ' ' • ' • ' . ' . " . . ' • • ' . . . . .
• Maximum detected concentrations of VOCs in groundwater are farbelow 1 percent to 10 percent solubility levels. Concentrations belowdie 1 percent to 10 percent solubility levels are generally accepted bydie scientific community as a negative indication of die existence ofnearby concentrated source areas or free phase liquid. . ...
• The evaluation of temporal trends of VOCs in ground water indicatesa general decrease in concentrations for most compounds. Trendsfor remaining compounds are either slightly increasing or cyclicalwith no distinguishable trend. None of the discemable trends ortemporal variations suggest concentrated source areas. In all dataexamined, overall concentrations are well below 1 percent solubilitylevels. .
* Air monitoring previously carried out at die site does not reveal thepresence of VOCs in air. Some detects in air would normally beexpected if compounds were being volatilized from a concentratedsource area.
Based on the above, it is Golder"s opinion diat hot spots at the ElizabethtownLandfill are not suggested by historic data and appear to be highly unlikely.Consequently, absent any indication to the contrary, additional studies to identifyhot spots are unwarranted and the presence of hot spots within or beneath thelandfill should not be considered in development of remedial alternatives to beevaluated in the Feasibility Study.
Golder AssociatesAR3056UI
October 1992 -9- 923-6053 .
6.0 REFERENCES
1. Kueper, B.H., Feensha S., Rivett M.O., and Cherry JA A Series ofControlled Field Experiments to Study DNAPL Behavior: Implications forS$te Remediation. Proc. HAZMAT International Conference, Atlantic City,NJ, June 10-12, 1992.
2. USEPA Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL at Superfund Sites.Quick Reference Fact Sheet Publication 9355-4-07FS, January 1992.
A:QAOCTFTX
Golder Associates _flR3056i»2
.^
. n______:________•._____. - .1 1 1 1 1 1 * 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 1
i i i t i i i
1 ' ' fe N. «i ' «? r «? •> r_. 5 5:! g - S g oi - 5
S"I I 9 £ £ I I 9 I * I » * « I I
O «. I I «5 «0 ,1 I 1C I K I fi r «J IIs i^s 8 5
§eccccG&cccec c cPSciPlliiiliili iiii:
•V B. « O
Illlfef I !
AR30S6ti3
i
3
mn,.: u
i
< : ssjf aI ill
j [li'i. " 2S3- 3 22 - ••• . 2
i i
53 3 33 1 335
tt 9 i i '3' '3113' ITll I » 10 a » i « i ta.w i i i8 ' S'et ' ' ' 9 '
_ ig 10 Ul .' . i f|
ri * *i, i •i 3 • <a i i a i i i • a i 9
N M -: 06
a *. a .-;-» a 3 si jN
O I I I' I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 9 1
f O O O O O O Q O Q O Q O O O Q Q OiiMliilliiii ifii
31ll
!
c
•EDttSED13IED13D
TRAVEL PIT----- ED5R
023-6053EAM
HCCttD:
AS SHOWNOAK: 09/17/02RI N.: PA02-122
LANDFILL LAYOUT ANDWELL LOCATION INFORMATION
Golder Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL. .. -1M-ajkua 4Ji «i.»-M — — Jt
APPENDIX A
Temporal Trend Curves
AR3056it6
CO,NED
0/6n)
flR3056lt7
S
-Jill
I5
AR305648
o
DCCM
sNED
AR3056t*9
• •
5I.QCO.yLLJ
AR30565Q
•3C
s
A" ' ' ' ' '
AR30565I
-QCO_MUJ
J I I
fl/6n)
AR305652
O
0)
.2£•ss_ooSJS-ii
CO
C.-CO ' . X • / * £ . - » • _,*•sQ
43 —— , ... ^ CMCON I
§t
AR305653
"i' S--6 UJ-3
^t
I- S M• Iti> - '- "- - 2•§ ^ Ti» §N _
^oQ
Tl I I I V
NOJD2_ox:oQQ-
HIoo6''' ' ' ' ' ' • ~ C\J
- . . - . ' • ; ; . - - ' • • W
(l/6n) uoj Jiuaouoo I• • • •*-•\3R305654
£LLJ
i1..1' '• ' .' . ' ' i1 "..' ' ' ' 'T" .
(l/6n)
AR305655
§
CO'SUJ
AR305656
5Q)«.Nin
4,,,,, , ,
ocCOa2ao
OD
CM
LLI
t
ftR305657
§8"8CO
UJ
1§
2o
__
_
6
0>T3
o£>
AR305658
IDCS
JDCO£LU
0/6n)
AR305659
*§
1_ _.>CCIsJSUJ
*•.'JONLG
nil i i i i i' '
ftR305660
3go
d/6n) uoj
<DTJ
OO
2_o6
AR30566I
CO
B-_COJMLU
111 i i i i i i5 .
•fl R305662
ICO
CO£UJ
AR305663
IS25niu
•CO.yLLI
' ' I XM I I I I I I
"'
<D-8 §5 N
o.0
I
t
AR30566**
CO
CON
II I I I I I T . Jl I I. :|. I I I I II I I I I I
fl/6n)
AR305665
ig
I05
COMLU
£
AR305667
••
5is_=_S«JQCO
S
0/Bn)
AR305668
CO.N5
I
•«D>.Q
Q< >o'
o>
5 ©i §5 N
Q>
2jO
6
I §
COCO
AR305669
Waste Management of North America, Inc.Northeast Region1121 Bordentown RoadMorrisville, Pennsylvania 19067215/736-2000 • FAX: 21&736-Q51B
December 4, 1992
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region in841 Chestnut StreetPhiladelphia. PA 19107 ,
Atto: Ms. Sherry Gallagher(3HW23)
Re: ELIZABEIHTOV/N LANDFILL RI/FS .ADDENDUM TO LANDFILL CONTENTS SUBMISSION
Dear Sherry,
Following our meeting of November 4, 1992, SCA Services of Pennsylvania Inc.. (SCA)wishes to provide further discussion relative to the "burn area11 located near the top of thelandfill (as shown on Attachment 1 of SCA's October 8, 1992 submission to USEPA) andthe groundwater quality of the site.' • • • ' • • . : • ' ' • - . - - " 'From the results of the interviews conducted with former landfill employees by SCA, it isSCA's understanding that the burn area was a location comprised of a shallow trench wherevarious liquids contained in drums were poured onto brush and tree cuttings and used asan accelerator to aid in the combustion of those materials.
Consistent with the approach presented in Enclosure 2 of SCA's October 8, 1992 submittal,SCA's further review of concentration data and time-tiend plots for chlorinated and non-chlorinated solvents (e.g., from Bore! ED9R) provides no indication that free phase liquidsare present in ground water in or surrounding the old burn area. In addition, we do notfind any conclusfre technical evidence which suggests any direct relationsliip between thebum area and the groundwater quality observed at the site.
Furthermore, we have not detected degradation of the air quality in this location at the site.Volatile compounds would be expected to be detected in air over potential hot spot areasif such compounds were present in high enough concentrations to represent hot spots. Theresults of the extensive air monitoring traverses conducted during the recent Phase 1A fieldinvestigation activities confirmed this finding. No detects of volatile organic compounds inair over, or in close proximity to the burn area were found. , . .
AR305670
Thus, the technical information available to SCA does not provide any indication that thei J burn area may constitute a potential hot spot area at the Elizabethtown Landfill requiring~ additional study. /
. . ' . * . . • ••'.-'• . ' •
. . Representing SCA Services of Pennsylvania,
GlenSchultzProject Manager „••
• ' . --7 .'
Richard C. KarrSuperfund Coordinator
AR30567I
APPENDIX H
PACKER TEST PROCEDURES AND ANALYSIS METHODS
AR305672
April 1994 ,H-l 923-6053
PACKER TESTINGIntroduction ,Drill stem testing was originally developed by the petroleum industry for thetesting and assessment of reservoir productivity. In recent years, drill stem testinghas become increasingly popular in the .environmental industry due to itseffectiveness in determining aquifer properties in low permeability rock, in amanner which is both more efficient and more accurate than most other aquifertesting methods. Outlmed below is a brief description of packer testing proceduresand equipment and methods used in the analysis of packer test results.
Packer Testing Set-upBriefly, the packer testing at the Elizabethtown Landfill Site was completed usinga double packer assembly with/three pressure transducers, to monitor headconditions above, below and within each test section. The packer assemblyconsistsof a pair of inflatable rubber cylinders separated by a section of perforated
' ' • ' . ' - ' • • ' • - ' 'steel pipe. When the packers are inflated, a test zone within the corehole isisolated from the rest of the corehole. Water is then allowed to flow in or out ofthe test zone via the perforated pipe/ and under controlled conditions. Aschematic diagram of the packer testing is presented in Figure 1. The packer toolwas equipped with a downhole shut-in valve for testing purposes and forobtaining head values in low permeability strata. The test interval length wasbased on the amount of stratigraphic and lithologic variability observed in the corerecovered from the corehole and was typically set at 14.4 feet Information gainedfrom this testing includes the variation in hydraulic conductivity between geologicunits and the variation in hydraulic head with depth. ••'
Borehole Drill Stem Packer Testing ProceduresThe general packer testing procedure is as follows:
1) Lower the packer assembly to the required depth;^—^ - •. *
• ' ' ' ' . . • • ' ' . « i .Golder Associates
AR305673
April 1994 , H-2 923-6053
2) Calibrate tiie pressure transducers;• - • ''" ' ' . . ' . • ' . ' .'' •
3) Inflate the packers using compressed nitrogen;
4) Measure. the stable water level inside the drill rod (Le., thepotentiometric level of the test zone). In a tight formation, close thedownhole shut-in valve to determine the static head value within thetest section;
5a) Add water to the drill rods above the shut-in valve in preparation. for me falling head test, or
5b) Pump water out of the drill rods in preparation for a rising head test(appropriate for shallow or above-ground potentiometric levels);
6) Open the shut-in valve allowing water in the drill rods to enter thetest section;
7) Monitor the change in head with time (flow period/falling head test);! ' ' • -• • . • ', i
8) Closing, of the downhole shut-in valve to complete the "shut-in"testing; and
9) Deflation/opening of all valves and packers. -
Figure 2 illustrates a Typical Packer Test Plot which was created to illustrate theresponse of the pressure transducers to the changes in head during a typicalpacker test event Transducers Tl, T2, and T3 are noted on Figure 2, and monitorthe pressure head above, within, and below the test section, respectively.Transducer T4 is submerged within the drill rods, and monitors the flow in or outof the system. The narrative below explains in detail the steps involved on Figure2 during a typical packer test and the elapsed time in which they occur on thisparticular plot:
• Steps 1 and 2 are completed before an elapsed time of 0 on theTypical Packer Test Plot
• * • . ' •
• At the initiation of the test the packers are inflated (Step 3), andsmall pressure pulses are observed at each transducer location (seen
Golder Associates
AR305671*
I. J
April 1994 H-3 ,: _,• 923-6053
at an elapsed time of 0 to 4 minutes). These pulses are caused bythe displacement of water in the borehole as the packer expands.
• At an elapsed time of approximately 4 minutes, the "shut-in" valveis dosed to isolate the test section (Step 4a). This causes a sharpdecrease in the pressure head recorded by transducer T2, because thetest section has been isolated from the effects of vertical gradients,etc., that occur above or below the test section. This pressure
i decrease is observed during an elapsed time of 4 to 16 minutes. Thedrop in pressure head occuts when the "shut-in" valve is closed, andT2 Is allowed to equilibrate to the static head within the test section.At this point in the test (an elapsed time of 16 minutes), the statichead of transducer T2 can be determined. • The reasons for the
; sudden drop in head at transducer T2 are the elimination ofwellbore storage effects and the presence of downward gradients inthis particular test This response is variable, depending on thepermeability of the rock unit being tested, and the presence ofupward or lateral gradients. <
• A volume of water is then added to the drill rods that suspend .thepacker system in the borehole (Step 5). There should be no evidenceof any pressure changes when the drill rods are filled with, or whenthey are full of water because the packer assembly is a controlledclosed system. A controlled closed system attempts to minimizeinput and output (i.e.; leakage) from the assembly.
• The water is released into the test section by opening the "shut-in"valve, to create a "falling head" affect (Step 6)(seen at elapsed time ofapproximately 16 minutes). A rapid increase in pressure is observedat transducer T2. This sudden increase in pressure is created by the.force of the water into the- isolated test section when the valve isopened.
• This addition of water creates a "flow period" (Step 7) into theisolated test section (at an elapsed time of 16 minutes to 37 minutes).The water entering me test section attempts to equilibrate as quicklyas possible, but the low permeability of the rock unit in thisparticular test section prevents this. Therefore, the decrease in headthroughout the "flow period" is minimal. The "flow period" isallowed to continue for either one-third of recovery or approximately20 to 25 minutes.
• ' • ' ' » ; - ' '
• At an elapsed time of approximately 37 minutes, the "shut-in" valveis closed again (Step 8), isolating the test section (transducer T2).
' ' This allows the pressure head in the test section to return to static, • r . • •
. : , Golder AssociatesflR305675
April 1994 H-4 923-6053
conditions, because the test section is isolated from any influences(i.e., vertical gradients, etc.). From an elapsed time of approximately37 minutes to 59 minutes, tine "shut-in" period is allowed to continue,ideally until the head level recorded for T2 reaches static conditions(for this particular test this occurred at an elapsed time ofapproximately 55 minutes to 59 minutes).
• At the end of the "shut-in" period (at an elapsed time ofapproximately 60 minutes), the valve is opened again, whichconstitutes the end of the test The packers are deflated (elapsedtime of approximately 59 minutes to 63 minutes). The head valuesrecorded for each transducer return to static borehole conditions(elapsed time of approximately 63 minutes) when the packers fullydeflate, as illustrated on Figure 1.
Other information to note on the typical packer test plot is the pressure recordedat transducer Tl remains essentially stable at a static head value of approximately1183 FT-MSL Transducer Tl is located above the isolated test section, and shouldbe unaffected by the "flow" and "shut-in" periods which create pressure headchanges that are recorded at transducer T2. The head values recorded fortransducer T3 decrease at the beginning of the test (from an elapsed time of 2minutes to 10 minutes) and stabilize to static conditions throughout the remainingportion of the test The observed stabilization of the head values at transducer T3verifies that the borehole length below the test section has been isolated frominfluences such as vertical gradients, etc. The static head values determined withineach test section (T2) and below each test section (T3) can be used to determinethe vertical gradients within the bedrock. The presence of transducers Tl and T3also aids in detecting leakage above, below or within the straddle packer system.The types of leakage that can occur during drill stem testing is as follows:
1) Leakage of water through the drilling rods above the test section atthe threaded joints. This can be noted by an increase in pressure
" recorded by transducer Tl, but can also be noted as a drop in thewater level inside the drill rods after they are filled;
2) Leakage into the test section at the threaded joints of the packer1 assembly, which is evident by pressure changes recorded bytransducer 12 during the addition of water to the drill rods; and
, Golder Associates
AR305676
April 1994 ; H-5 923-6053
3) Leakage around either the top or bottom packer, caused from a poorseal between the packers and the borehole wall, which can beobserved by a change in recorded pressures for transducer Tl, T2 orT3 during any of the packer testing steps.
At the Elizabethtown Landfill Site, the transducer responses were continuouslymonitored for indications of leakage during each test When signs of leakage weredetected, the test was aborted and rerun.
Packer Testing Analysis Methods
The data obtained from the packer testing program were analyzed using twomethods. Data obtained during the "flow" or "falling head" period of each testwere analyzed using modified the Hvorslev (1951) method (U.S. Department of the
' • . - ',Navy, 1982). Data, collected during the "shut-in" portion of each test interval wereanalyzed using the Horner method (1951). Data from the "flow" and "shut-in"\ - • ' ' • ' . ' • . • • ' • ' . • • •
( , periods, as described above, are labelled on the Typical Packer Test plot (Figure1 • ' • • • 2 ) . ' . - ; . ' • ' : • - . . ' . ; , :-v;:- , . . . . . . . . - . - ; • "
Hvorslev Method .
• Hvorslev developed a method for the determination of horizontal hydraulicconductivity using measured values of head difference (y) versus time (f). Themethodology of data analysis requires the plotting of head ratio (percentage ofhead yet to recover) on the vertical scale of semi-log paper versus time on thelinear horizontal scale, and is presented in a stepwise manner for bom rising andfalling head tests as follows:
Stepl:
Plot y/yfl (logarithmic) versus t in a semilogarithmic paper. Note: y0 is the initial"• . .' • - - , • ' i
head difference and is equal h0 - h.
Golder Associates AR3056I7
April 1994 H-6 923-6053
Step 2: ,''
' ; . - • ' • ' • ' . : . ' • • ...- . • , 'Because yt and t are the only variables in the equations, the plot must show astraight line (this is usually between 50 percent and 90 percent recovery). In otherwords, the straight line portion is the valid part of the readings, and the curvedpart of the plot may be due to wellbore storage, skin or boundary effects.
Step 3; . •
- , ' ' ^
Select two points on the straight line portion of the curve and record their (*_,?»._)•and (*2/ yj,_) coordinates. Record the other parameters.
Step 4; .
Use the equation below to calculate the horizontal hydraulic conductivity (K):
x 30.48 cm/sec
where: rc . = feet.x .*• 'feet •;•
• . • t =5 seconds
. . . . .
Horner Method •
The Homer analysis method requires the plotting of head recovery versus Hornertime, ft which is defined as:
where: f =» time since the beginning of the flow period- ' ' • • • < ' =s time since the "shut-in" valve was closed
The slope (m) obtained from this plot is defined as:m = dh/1 log cycle (of Homer time)
Golder AssociatesAR305678
• ' ' ' ' • . - • • ' , • • • ' ' : ' ^ - - • • ' • . ' • ' • • , - '.'' ' • ' ' ; • ' LApril 1994 . H-7 923-6053
' - ' ' ' ' ' . , ' . . " ' ' - ' ' N
The determination of the hydraulic conductivity (K) is based on Homer's ,VV modification of the Theis recovery method. The hydraulic conductivity is
estimated from the equation:
nan ;cm/sec
where: Q '•= the average flow rate during the flow period (gallonspermin)and .
L= length of the test section (feet)
At the Elizabethtown Site, the strata encountered .were found to be relativelypermeable. For this reason, induced head differences quickly disappeared after thevalve was closed at the end of the first part of the test Therefore the Hornermethod of analysis was not feasible or appropriate for many of the tests.
t ' ' . ' .
REFERENCES
Horner, D.R., 1951, "Pressure Build-Up in WeUs", Proceedings of the Third WorldPetroleum Congress - Section n. .
Hvorslev, M.J., 1951, "Time Lag and Soil Permeability in GroundwaterObservations", Bulletin 36, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways ExperimentStation, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
i .' ' • if ' .
U.S. Department of the Navy, 1982, "Soil Mechanics, Design Manual 7.1,"Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities and Engineering Command, Alexandria,Virginia.
Golder AssociatesAR305679
}
;.W
•
/ j
TESTZONE
. *
i
INSTRlCARF
(i
SHU1. • VAI
STR/PACAS6E
r '
1
'MENT 1HER 1^
i, V^
\T
r-iN r~jVE *l
r **
"•DOLE;KER•MBLY
1
CJ"
•—\
4 ———————— FLUSH JOINT CASING
_^__^—rELECTRICAL CABLES• ^ ^ (TO GROUND SURFACE)
• .' itDDCD nrrROOiiDC TIJ* nor^ii^Kr>
.« ————————— MIDDLE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER(T2)
i OWFR PRPCCIIDP TD A fttCnil^CD '
(T3). 1 H ANoUUOtn rticooUHc LINto
, (WATER FILLED TUBES)ft ——————— -SHUT-IN VALVE LINEh (TO GROUND SURFACE)
- ———————— PACKER INFLATION LINE• j (TO GROUND SURFACE)
M '
C
. • • • . . . ' • • - • - • " • • • • . . ,u* T2 PRESSURE LINE
- ———————— PERFORATED PIPE. - • • •
< ———————— EXTENSION
^ —— —————— PACKER INFLATION LINE• ———————— EXTENSION
' - '• ' .' • • • "'
_ • ' ' ' f%f* "* B«T_^I D1 A FCT* % ^}f *O C?
•* . , ' .•* ' : ! • •
•* ' '' • •-• ' ' '•* . ' . .- "
•»", 823-6053 $c*t£: NM QrMPMATir HIAnnAMi0""* EAM . OA1fc 04/01/93 QpM« •*• ^ ^ • ftt f HA • *** At 4 E < ' ^^ _ _ _ ~/T/t «*•«•. muz-lev *>^»nAr\ni e BAf*lfI?B AQQPMRIVTS777 ——— %% ———— ««^ 03 STRADDLE PACKER ASSEMBLY
Gddeir Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL WORE 1' • ™ ***** . . . H f^ f^ f^ fm- _** _m . ^
<
, wnjuoodu
oCO
*OlCO
CO
JM Nai 923-6053DUST. EAM
SCAtE
04/05//93PA02-184
SU8TITU: Q3
TYPICAL PACKER TESTDATA PLOT
Golder Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL
\.
APPENDIX I. : -, •
PACKER TEST RESULTS
OAR305682
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WEUTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OP TESTED ZONEDEPTH OP ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OFDEPTH OP ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OP CASINO ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OP CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION ,
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (H&HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OP SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OP RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OP SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OP RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
ED171 . '
Z55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBG3
17.00 FT46.20 FTBG3T 63.2065.90 FTBG3T 2010036.40 FTBGST 43.50
6£0 FT529.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
42.90 FEET BELOW TOC486.75 FTMSL
486.28 FT522.33 FT36.05 FT498.29 FT24.03 FT
5.67 MIN9.83 MIN
*
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
"•
.
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
• , ' ' • /
(HI-H1VCHI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.51 1.6190.00 SEC 90.00
2.34E-Q4 CM/3 2.71 E-04SECCM/3
-RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE PLOW RATE(KHYDRAUUC HEAD)/dILOQ a/HiHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
t
1.53 GPMNANA CM/3
M————AR305683
~u
^^
Q
\ r
* COLd
00
LlJ .v j. «rt —' CN
Lv T >l . <^s k
.*i1
_l__-I I I I I I I I I I
O CN " f U) 00 T- CN ' ' f tO tD CN CN t tO« . « • « I * • ' « « • « • 4
•? ? ? ? ' T T T T ' 7 7 7
(U) OI1VU OV3H OnnVfcOAH NT• *" . • '- • ' • ' ' '
AR30568U
TABLE 1 ,SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHODEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP ' .TOP OF CASING ELEVATION • .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW, TOP OF CASING) , . . •GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (H<x)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST 0: T - 0)
..
ED172 . . ' • , , . . '
2.55 INCH3.73 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
17.00 FT170.00 FTBGST 187.00 FTBGS.189.70 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS41.90 FTBGST 167.30 FTBGS
2.6Q FT525.75 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
44.50 FEET BELOW TOC481.25 FTMSL
483.22 FT' 524.93 FT
41.71 FT494.75 FT30.19 FT
9.40 MIN12.40 MIN
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(HI-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.64 1.6572.00 SEC 72.00 SEC
mmmCUIS. 3.57E)4 CM«' • . ' '
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULJC HEAD) / d|LOG (T/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
2.67 GPM5.83
3.35E-04 CM/3
OoldwAneelatet AR305685
00
(u) oiivfc ov3H onnvucuH NT
ftR305686
Io
CNd
Q - - - - - - - - - - - *
UJ
LJ
LJ 00d
o00
CO -
oo toUJ <j
o
cr£* - -
o tn. o in o & o in oSCN CN *• ^- Q Q 9? 2tn «n to io 05 to ^ •*
(JLJ) ov3H onnvaaAH
AR305687
i
I
T
37(O
T•t—i
i
o
TABLE 1 -SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER . ,BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GHOUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -HOS)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(HI-HlV(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY '
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATE(KHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
<
ED173 • ' '
2.55 INCH3.76 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
17.00 FT v155.10 FTBGST 172.10174.80 FTBGST 202.0042.10. FTBGST 152.40
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
44.60 FEET BELOW TOC481.05 FTMSL
479.99 FT516.71 FT36.71 FT493.54 FT23.17 FT
6.03 MIN 'NA MIN
TR2 DATA TR4 DATA.1.35 1.5770.00 SEC 70.00
. 3.31E-04
NA GPMNANA CM/S
FT BGSFTBGSFTBGS
-• • .
SECCM/S
4
Golder Associates 'AR305688
i
N 00 Ol »" T-Ti ', ..(u) oava OV3H onnvacuw NI
•' * -
AR305689
U
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER 'BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UP ^TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi • HOS)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor) '
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0)
. •-• • ' .. -• » . . . • ' • ' • ' -
ED174 . •'':• •
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
17.00 Ft140.10 FTBGST 157.10 FTBGS159.80 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS41.60 FTBGST 137.40 FTBGS
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
44.10 FEETBELOWTOC481.55 FTMSL
482.50 FT523.5.6 FT41.06 FT486.81 'FT36.75 FT .
22.87 MINNA MIN
- ... . • , .' , : '••':' .-'';;•'''. ' . .<•'.''SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-HlV(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
•' ' ~" • •
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.66 1.6390.00 SEC 90.00 SEC
HHHlCM/s 2.78E-04 CM;S •RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/TIJHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
CO
fI
Si <A' '55 <J 1^- «
O -i- ' -CN »O ^J- in <O N 00« « « * •
'? ? 'T T .T ? ?
(JJ> OI1VH OV3H OlinVdOAJH NT •
ft R 30-5691
"L/TABLE 1 : : . * . . • • • • - _
SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY ' .DEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UP'TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONDEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGININQ OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T - 0
' "if
ED175. ' ;
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
17.00 FT125.00 FTBGST 142.00144.70 FTBGST 202.0041.60 FTBGST 122.30
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
44.10 FEET BELOW TOO481.55 FTMSL
481.28 FT512.02 FT30.74 FT483.56 FT28.46 FT
6.67 MINNA MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
• ' . . ' ' . ' . ' • : * ' ' - .SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60 .HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA3.78 4.8936.00 SEC 36.00
2.26E-03SECCM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
Golder Associates AR305692
• >
0 pit 1 C
0
LU o5 t
=**0
CO
f\
sLd • x ^
O CN • "t <O 00 i- CN• «
i«
00d
6 Z
PI +
O
CNd
- CN ^<0 00 CN CN ^fr <O! « . « « • ' I ' • • «
T. ? 7 7 7 7 , ' 7 77
ouva ov3H onnvdOAH NT
AR305693
TABLE 1 ,SUMMARY OF HYDHOGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONINITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T1 • 0
. --.I • . ;ED176
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
17.00 FT110.00 FTBGST 127.00 FTBGS129.70 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS41.68 FTBGST 107.30 FTBGS
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
44.18 FEET BELOW TOC481.47 FTMSL .
481.70 FT515.87 FT34.17 FTNA FTNA FT
11.50 MINNA MIN
• ' ' ' - . . • • . ' • * . • • •
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(HI-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2 DATA TR4 DATA1.78 . 1.6216.00 SEC 18.00 SEC
llilillCM/S 1.38E-03 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSI?
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) /dlLOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
Golder Associates AR305691*
rbJ t
=J 2LJ o
. _ q
LJ c!__ <o1 ***O |-JCO
,
•
<
'
'i> T
JT
- c
,'
M- H
/r
* ^
-.
t u
x •
1
0 (I
£
o r
•
^
s 0
,
X
0 C
7jt-
-
' •
/
— r
'
\
f
• ,C
/
j
1 *
•t
'
f) ^
x
t U
s
0 <J
x
/
o r
/
v C
/
0 C
.
n c
'W
5o
too
. J < Jd u
1 ''w ^ Vp;;"iCNd
°
N
ouva ov3H onrwacuH t>n
ftR305695
TABLE 1 '•'} ...vSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO. v
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION .
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS -Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T « 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST 0; T • 0
'"'•.'
Ep177
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT48.50 FTBGST 62.9065.60 FTBGST 202.0040.40. FTBGST 45.80
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
42.90 FEET BELOW TOC482.75 FTMSL
485.50 FT520.44 FT34.94 FT .497.49 FT22.95 FT
. 31.87 MIN36.13 MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
-
• . . . . . • • ' • • • . . , " ' . < .SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA . TFMDATA1.65 1.93
120.00 SEC . 120.00iHHHCM/S 3.22E-04
SEC .CM/S
' • • : • • ' ' • ' ' •RECOVERYTEST • ,RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/d[LOG CT/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
1.43 GPM£.08
2.43E-04 CM/S
v ! ' ' • . . . • •ft R 3-056.96
Golder Associates
I I I I • 'I I I L 1 1 1 1 L I I I I .O * CN *IO •* IT) <0 N 00 C • *- . r CN K) IS • 00 O1 ' CN
il I l I I I I I I I I I I I I l
CM) ouvy ov3H onnvyoJkH NT
OLJ
LJ
LJ
°S-' - ' : '' . ' " i* • ' " ' '• ' .- -
CO
m
><LJ
o '
o
00
co ' -is • * <o in • •<*• r o c N T-oen o cj> 01 en en en en 5?
N . • . ' ' • : ' ' . / ' • • ' ' ' • - : • . . • • •
*
io
T
ICD
CMI
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL .'TESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION •
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD ATTHE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI • Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD ATTHE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS • Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST 0: T -
ED178 . • ' - • • ; ' - ;
2.55 INCH ' •3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT64.00 FTBGST 78.40 FTBGS31.10 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS43.80 FTBGST 61.30 FTBGS
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
43.80 FEET BELOW TOC481.85 FTMSL
482.34 FT522.95 FT40.60 FTNA FTNA FT
1' • ' • .
2.20 MINNA MIN
/ • • .• ' . • ' • ' • ' . • • . ' • • : • • • . ' ' . • - , , . •SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2) . . ' • . . - . . -(T2-T1)x60 ,HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.06 .1.08
240.00 SEC 240.00 SECHmiCM/3 1.38E-05 CM/3 '
RECOVERYTEST ,RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS .
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOQ (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CMI3
AR305699Golder Associates
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
-s
T - C N l O ^ l r i t t J l v flOKCIi »-'*-. C N l O ^ f r 10'.<O|SCOO1CNO CJ'CJ CJ < C) CJ CJ C) X *•; ^ *•; T; *•; ^ ^ *- Q
' TTT?:T'T,'
(jj> oiivu ovsH onnvuoAH
AR305700
•J
I
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENQTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HI)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGININQ OF SLUG TEST (t: T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
ED179 • ' . . ' . - • ' • .
2.55 INCH3>8>INCH -
202.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT78.00 FTBGST 92.40 FTBGS95.10 FTBGST 20ZOO FTBGS45.20 FTBGST 75.30 FTBGS
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL '
45.20 FEET BELOW TOC480.45 FTMSL .
480.24 FT '521.43 FT41.19 FTNA FTNA FT
2.03 MIN4.30 MIN
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(HI-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60 'HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.03 NA
360.00 SEC . NA SECi|||i|Ol|CM/S NA CM/S
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS ' ,
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/ dlLOG CT/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY ,
NA GPM4.12NA CM/3
AB30570.J
LJ2 +
O «- <N rO ^t- IOU> S 00q q p p p q q o ,qd d d d d do d d i il i i l - I l l l l ' I I I I l l l I I
OllVd QV3H OnnVJdQAH N1
AR305702
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY '
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS -Hor) .;
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t: T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (1; T - 0
ED1710
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH.
202.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT96.00 FTBGST 110.40 FTBGS113.10 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS45.20 FTBGST 93.30 FT BG3
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
45.20 FEETBELOWTOC480.45 FTMSL
480.14 FT . '" '523.92 FT43.78 FTNA FTNA FT
7.00 MINNA MIN
• • • • • '• • • ' ' . '
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(HI-H1XHI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY '
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.91 t.89
720.00 SEC 720.00 SEC'ZsmmCMJS 5.17E-05 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATE <d(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/3
Holder Ajwctatej A ft 3 0 5 7 0 3
co cn T- r- CMo T- CN.^ _ .'T ?
(u) ouvd OV3H onnvdOAH NTAR305701*
I
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTE3TNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTHTESTED • ' vDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY ,
STICK-UP . .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOWTOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0
*
ED1711
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT114.00 FTBGST 128.40 FTBGS131.10 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS45.05 FTBGST 111.30 FTBGS
3.00 Ft526.15 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
45.05 FEETBELOWTOC481.10 FTMSL
480 39 FT523.47 FT43.07 FT522.54 FT0.92 FT
19.40 MIN23.07 MIN
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)<T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.19 1.2180.00 SEC 80.00 SEC
::l27E i5llCM/3 1.39E-04 CM/3.
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE FLOW RATECKHYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG (T niHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVnY
0.07 GPM0.42
1.36E-04 CM/3
Golder Associates AR305705
U. ,. ••':'.'•'•'..;.;'"; .(u) ouva ov3H onnvdOAH NT
AR305706
' ' • . •. • »I . • • • .
OLJind
LJ « lN
f
§00CN
CO t
LJ 5> C,
o:Q
iK)
TinT
LJN
O ^ ', ' " jS' . • en
T
3
O Q O O O O Oen 00 r »"T . f -W *———• • >———' V __ - __
8 8 S S en 05 *
(u) OV3H onnvyaAH '„„-,AR305707
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELLTESTNO. /
'' . t •DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER vBORBHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD ATTHE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t: T « 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST C: T • 0
ED1712
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
202.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT176.00 FTBGST 190.40 FTBGS193.10 FTBGST 202.00 FTBGS45.20 FTBGST 173.30 FTBGS
2.50 FT525.65 FTMSL523.15 FTMSL
45.20 FEET BELOW TOO480.45 FTMSL
480.54 FT517.81 FT '37.27 FT492.86 FT24.95 FT
16.17 MIN18.70 MIN
" ' • • ' • . ' ' • • ' ' . ' ' •
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hl-H2)(T2-T1)x«0 . •HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA2.45 2.77
122.00 SEC 122.00 SECmilMCM/S 4.90E-04 CM/S
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
2.61 GPM6.99 •
3.23E-04 CM/S
Golder Associates AR305708
— 1 Ol
LJ gt
CO £
§6.
CN
2- • »— '
U
00d
CN >o **t in <o N 00 en ^ *- c N » o ^ t in• 5 « « « il • « I • « • • • 4
<? ?'•? ?•???.? •! 7 7 777
(u) oiiva.ovaH onnyyom NT/
SR305709
J • •'•• -, . •'•• ' ' ' • ' , -i
QLJ
LJ
LJ
CO tQ_ q
**>' Q
LJXO
CM
' I
i»
in
2
m *? K) CN •*- o en 03 is <o in t to CM T- o en oo N <o in' ' •
U - " • : • ' - . " • . . ' • ' ' • , - : . " ' - ' • : -OV3H
H
1*~ . . • iI
in
AR3057IO
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 1
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HoS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T»0)
• • • . • ' : • " ' • ; . • •2.55 INCH ,3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT38.00 FTBGS TO 52.40 FTBGS55.10 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS15.56, FTBGS TO 35.30 FTBGS2.50 FT .
503.90 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
18.00 FEET BELOW TOC485.90 FTMSL
489.94 FT496.71 FT . " " •6.77 FTNA FTNA FT
4.27 MIN .NA MIN
\ - '
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2) •(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA6.68 . ' Z8130.00 SEC 43.00 SEC
1.26E-03 CM/S '• •
FIECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
AR3057Ii
O
QLJ
Ld
CMr— *°</) £
ElQ S
^
1«? rto •
I"1<0 -€ ~d P P
+
CMd
O »•; • CS »O *fr lO <O N, 00 Ct •- •-
d o <? f <? ? ? f • . < ? . . ' T
O.) onvy ov3H onnvwaAH NT
RR3057I2
<I
TABLE 1 . . ! --SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL . ED19TESTNO. 2
DRILL ROD DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DIAMETER . 'BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HO -HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (I; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-OJ
. ' • - - ' ' . '
2.55 INCH3,73 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT53.60 FTBGS TO 68.00 FTBGS70.70 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS15.50 FTBGS TO 50.90 FTBGS
6
2.50 Ft'503.90 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
18.00 FEETBELOWTOC485.90 FTMSL
485.81 FT502.83 FT17.03 FTNA FT .NA FT
5.60 MINNA MIN . .
• • • . ' " ' . . ' • - '
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS .
(HI-H1XHI-H2) • - i(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.18 1.1743.00 SEC 43.00 SEC
iZG€PS|ICM/S 1.88E-04 CM/3 ..
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE R.OW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTlVrTY
NA GPMNANA CM/3
• v . • - v.i
ftM v ' , AB3057I3Golder Associates
Cu> ouLVd yov3H onnvwaAH NT
Ci
AR30S7-U
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 3
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft T-0)
2.55 INCH3.73 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT68.00 FTBGS TO 82.4085.10 FTBGS TO 200.00
. 15.50 FTBGSTO 65.30
2.50 FT503.90 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
18.00 FEET BELOW TOC485.90 FTMSL
l
485.58 FT505.20 FT19.62 FT495.60 FT9.59 FT
8.00 MIN27.20 MIN
FTBGSFTBG3FTBGS
• ' ' . . • ' . ' . - • ' - ' • ' • ' . ' • -
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS,
(HI-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA. 1.03 1.0456.00 SEC 56.00
Iilf£M:lCM/3 4.14E-05SECCM/3
• ' • - . ' . • " . .RECOVERYTE3TRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOQ (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
0.13 GPM1.97
5.82E-05 CM/3
t
Ooldet Associates AR3057I5
OJ> ouva OV3H onnvaoiH NT
flR3Q57l6
enaLJijJ2I—c_:LJ
Q.
g
<LJ
U
tc . . __ ,
CLJ) QV3H
CMI
CMI
00CMI
Q
oOTef - 3 +LJ> %
I
oqdI
CM•T
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 4
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION v
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HI)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T-0)
... - • ' -
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT83.10 FTBGS TO 87.50 FTBGS100.20 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS15.60 FTBGS TO 80.40 FTBGS
3.00 FT504.40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
18.60 FEET BELOW TOO485.80 FTMSL
484.59 FT1 504.60 FT- 20.01 FT
503.11 FT1.49 FT
6.43. MIN27.17 MIN
.
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA . TR4DATA1.02 1.02
238.00 SEC 238.00 SECKRPICM/S • ' 5.22E-06 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATE ,d(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG fT/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
0.02 GPM2.81
5.86E-06 CM/S
Golder Associates 4 R 3 0 5 7 | 0
Cu> oavy ov3H onnvyaAH NT
AR3057I9
-QLJLJ
LJ
I
COdI
LJ7T
Q- P.O £i-sco £ % ^Z> tW -.p? aLJ ^"• '. «B"
~ CMI
1C 'cp
CiJ) QV3H
CMI
00CM|
Q
' o
AR305720
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 5
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER 'BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION .
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI • Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos • Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
• '•-.' -'•' ' ' . _ ;
2.55 INCH3.73 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT93.10 FTBGS TO 112.50 FTBGS115.20 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS15.60 FTBGS TO 95.40 FTBGS
abo FT504:40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
18.60 FEETBELOWTOC485.80 FTMSL
485.27 FT506.15 FT •2a88 FT420.00 FT86.15 FT
5.63 MIN26.17 MIN
SLUGTEST -RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60 ;HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TFMDATA1.29 • 1.28
650.00 SEC 650.00 SECp2ii/c 05liCM/S 2.23E-03 CM/3
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATE .d(HYDRAULICHEAD)/d[LOO(T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
1.11 GPM13.25
7.26E-05 CM/3' . ' . .
AR30572IGolder Associates
\J
CiJ> ou.va W3H onnvaaxH
AR305722
o*QLJ
LJ
O «nX £
00LJ, &
tn
en
LJIO
o:a
CO*"" CM
o <TI* oo r*» <om ^ K J C M •—• o.3' 5=5 5 5 ? 5 5 $ 5 5
Cu>
CMI
7 9
CMI.
CMI
COCMI
AR305723
TABLE 1 . . . , . . .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 6
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTED 'DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION • 'GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS • Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST 0: T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
1
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT113.00 FTBGS TO 127.40130.10 FTBGS TO 200.0015.60 FTBGS TO 110.30
13.00 FT514.40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
28.60 FEET BELOW TOC485.80 FTMSL
484.80 FT498.11 FT1341 FTNA FTNA FT
7.57 MINNA MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
- • • . ' ' ' ' ' • ' ' ' • . . . . '
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.00 1.00
300.00 SEC 300.00|il! iB7|CM/S 1.62E-07
SECCM/S
• ' • • • • •RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) /d[LOG (T/niHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
•
o.,.——u_ AR.30572V
Cu> oiiva ov3H onnvyaAH NT
AR305725
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL . ED19TESTNO. 7
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL,
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION .
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS • Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T-0)
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT146.00 FTBGS TO 160.40163.10 FTBGS TO 200.0016.70 FTBGS TO 143.30
13.00 FT514.40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
29.70 FEET BELOW TOO484.70 FTMSL
484.57 FT492.38 FT
7.81 FTNA FTNA FT,
- 8.63 MINNA MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
» . _ .. ' .
SLUGTEST 'RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY .
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.34 '" 1.4016.00 SEC 18.00
• 1.10E-03SECCM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
* ' - • . ' .
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG fT/niHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
Golder Associates A ft 3 0 5 7 2 6
en5LJ
LJ CO<+ ^ d
to eLJ tH- o. _ BB
LJ *
^
7r7
CM
<qd
CMd
o •• CM to . ** «*> <o • f* co ch «-~ * - . . . » • _ ; • * • ' • . - . I ; '
? ? ? ?
Cu> oiiva ov3H onnvyoAH NT
M305727
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 8 '.. .
, - • ' . . . _ • f \
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER •BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTH TESTED ,DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
• s • • ' -
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME tO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST C; T«0)
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH .
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT161.00 FTBGS TO 175.40 FTBGS178.10 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS15.50 FTBGS TO 158.30 FTBGS
2.50 FT*503.90 FTMSL •501.40 FTMSL
18.00 FEETBELOWTOC485.90 FTMSL
485.90 FT492.89 FT6.99 FTNA FTNA FT
72.10 MIN ' ' ' ,NA MIN
SLUGTEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
.. '%'
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) •(T2-T1)X60 ,'.HYDRAULJC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA5.18 NA
4500.00 SEC 4500.00 SECi llElollCM/S NA CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T7T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
Golder Associates A R3 057 2 8
HYDRAULIC HEAD VERSUS
TIME: WELL EDI 9
TEST #8 (161.0 FT TO 175.4
FT)
f\
• •
' '
•'
..
..
..
.
'
•
../
1
- i .
:j1r
If
•
*
/
^
- .-;.
• •
•
•'.
• , •
D «n *- »n CM m KJ to •+ m «rd L - 1 CM 1 Kj 1 «+ 11 1 \ 1 1 1
O00
s !,+
oixva OV3H onnvyaAH NT
AR305729
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 9
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD 0 0HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos- Hor) - ,
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TESTJt; TVO)
/
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT .176.00 FTBGS TO 190.40193.10 FTBGS TO 200.0017.20 FTBGS TO 173.30
13.00 FT514.40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
30.20 FEET BELOW TOG484.20 FTMSL
483.87 FT605.65 FT21.78 FT489.97 FT15.68 FT
6.03 MIN8.87 M!N
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
SLUG TEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)CT2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA . TR4DATA1.22 1.2624.00 SEC 24.00
6.57E-04SECCM/S
' , . • '• ' "RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG 0/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
1.47 GPM3.29
3.86E-04 CM/S
*
AR305730Golder Associates
0LJ
. iLJ E5 **•. 0
01
a 1< ~LJ £x.fc
u
2:-J<u.
c
t
• ^.
^^^1 •
•-
-
•7r-pd/
r
^f^
/r*"/£.
£
,/i
\
Xp
3
^^
.
) _ CM HJ •* tfj <O K CO 01 •m » » • • • > • • • »
? 7 •?••.? ? f ? ? ?
•*CM
CM
•*•
00-0
•*o
o
^
Cu> oiivy dv3H onnvaaAH NT
flR30573!
i J
:G
CLJ) av3H onnvaoAH
6R305732
TABLE 1 . -,SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 10
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OP BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
I •
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (H03- HOT)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST 0; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T«0)
2.55 INCH178 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT163.00 FTBGS TO 177.40 FTBGS180.10 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS13.37 FTBGS TO 160.30 FTBGS
3.00 FT1504.40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL .
19.37 FEET BELOW TOO485.03 FTMSL
484.99 FT - -501.68 FT1&67 FT499.76 FT ,
1.90 FT. .
9.77 MIN29.83 MIN
!
SLUGTEST ,RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS. -
(HI-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.02 1.03
246.00 SEC 246.00 SECH9HIHCM/3 5.93E-06 CM/3
RECOVEHYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSI
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/ d[LOQ (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY
0.03 GPM3.35
6.48E-06 CM/S -
AR3Q5733Golder Associates
S » - . * - • « . «« »-••••-. • *-
M< 1
Cu> onvy OV3H onnvwaAH NT
AR30S73U
enoLJLJ
LJ2 F'&!oo s(£ 3LJ ~> 2
• =*B
Q &5< £LJOC •*
CMI
00CMI
Ov- . O <Jl GOS S 5 5
dI
oqdI
CM
T
<oT
CM
o~s
AR3Q5735
TABLE 1 'SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED19TESTNO. 11
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER,
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos • Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST Q; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T«0)
< . \ • ' ' ;".
2.55 INCH3.76 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT118.00 FTBGS TO 132.40 FTBGS135.10 FTBGS TO 200.00 FTBGS16.50 FTBGS TO 115.30 FTBGS
3.00 FT504.40 FTMSL501.40 FTMSL
19.50 FEET BELOW TOC484.90 FTMSL
484.45 FT505.85 FT
21.40 FT503.31 FT ,
2.54 FT
9.63 MIN.32.37 MiN
' :' ' ' .
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hl-Hiy(Hi-H2)CT2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.04 f 1.04
420.00 SEC 420.00 SECIPS3E1SS1CM/S 5.30E-06 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSI?
AVERAGE FLOW RATECKHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG CT/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
0.03 GPM5.90
4.34E-06 CM/S
W3Q5736Golder Associates
« <o h- oo <j» ' . »• «- CMO O O O Oo o o o o o o o o i o o o o oI I I I II I I I I
Cu> oava ov3H onnvyaAH m
AR3Q5737
O-> QV3H
AR305738
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGld TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TESTNO. . 2
i . "
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE) '
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t: T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T-0)
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC coNDucnvrryRECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE FLOW RATE .OXHYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCnvrTY
. •
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH .
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT211.60 FT BGS TO 226.00 FTBGS228.70 FT BGS TO 250.50 FT BGS3.30 FT BGS TO 208.90 FTBGS
14.10 FT426.30 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
17.40 FEET BELOW TOC408.90 FTMSL
413.14 FT428.66 FT15.52 FTNA FTNA FT
41.90 MINNA MIN
- . ' , . .
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.68 NA
1200.00 SEC ~ . NA SECli li$|CM/3 ' NA CM/S
NA GPMNANA CM/S .
oiivy o\f3H onnydQAH NT*
TABLE1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS.
WELL ED20TESTNO. 3
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS -HO!)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST 0; T»0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST fl; T-0)
i • . .
2.55 INCH178 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT200.00 FT BGS TO 214.40217.10 FT BGS TO 250.50130 FT BGS TO 197.30
14.10 FT426.30 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
17.40 FEET BELOW TOC408.90 FTMSL
409.18 FT420.24 FT .11.08 FTNA FTNA FT
35.07 MINNA MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.
(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA2.41 . NA
J54.00 SEC- NAiw566i P CM/3 . ' NA
SECCM/3
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOQ(T/D)HYDRAUUC CONDUCTMTY.
NA GPMNANA CM/3
AR30571*Golder Associates
O ... -.
oCNQLJ
-JoLJ C
r— "//% o(/In-LJ t
q
V_J kJ m*m J/)
o Ij
2' . ••'• c
"
i¥. '
3 »C
• J
/
kj %
c? '
\\
/
rM *r c
>
•.
f
•
•j ' •• ^a c
'
• .'
^
t- u3 C
•
^;
1
T <l
?''' 'C
H
"
D ri5 *
— — #
^ cf c
^ ^
^ r
0 <D C
h "
?
—
— ««
Cc
(1(
*
<
<<
^
••1
COd
(0d
1 •
i >
CMd
OJ> oavy OV3H onnvyaAH NT
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?
WELL ED20TESTNO. 4
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
snck-upTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TESt (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
2.55 INCH '3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT185.00 FT BGS TO 199.40 FTBGS202.10 FT BGS TO 250.50 FTBGS
3.30 FT BGS TO 182.30 FTBGS
14.10 FT'426.30 FTMSL41Z20 FTMSL
17.40 FEET BELOW TOO408.90 FTMSL
408.40 FT •414.45 FT8.04 FTNA FTNA FT
99.23 MINNA MIN
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.40 2.0748.00 SEC 48.00 SEC
llOiiPICM/S 8.91E-04 CM/S
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
Solder Aueetates AR3057U3
oCNOLJ
LJ^ ioo eLJ tHoQ |
w £*-*- </)
LL,
<*>
<4
CM
COd
<o ,_o <
CMd.
O '••••• <M *O A J - U J A O f»» . CD < h » - *•• • I •- • •. • • _» _• _• i •?^^ f^ ^^ ' 'C3 ^^ ^^3 C3 Cj • **•I I I I I I I I I
Cu> oiLvy ov3H onnvaaAH
i }' i
TABLETSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TEST NO. 5
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATEH ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
•
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY
RECOVERYTEST .RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOQ (TfT)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
£55 INCH3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT170.00 FT BGS TO 184.40 FTBGS187.10 FTBGSTO 250.50 FTBGS3.10 FTBGSTO 167.30 FTBGS
14,10 FT426.30 FTMSL41Z20 FTMSL
17.20 FEET BELOW TOC409.10 FTMSL
409.64 FT425.70 FT16.06 FT423.67 FT2.03 FT
24.33 MIN44.23 MIN
'. •
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.15 1.11
950.00 SEC 950.00 SEClt8lpiJi;;CM/S , 6.29E-06 CM/S
.
0.03 GPM4.27
5.47E-06 CM/S
Gotder Associates
<
5 ° 5 8 8 g 8 S5 § § 5 - 2 5-S-S.5 £ £ *d d d d d d d d o* d i d d d d d d d d dl I l l l III l l I l I I l i I I
Cu) ouvy ovsH onnvaaAH NT
flR3057l»6
CMdo
tNoLJ i ;»fsr i <o
X i.
LJ5LJE00
Si00 t
Q<LJ
Q
qd^1 > loo« ; - . _ • . : • . , ,
CMCMI
i
CMI
i •? °4 r: 9 <" °° f- •. <o * ..•*•' KJ • 'CMCM • CM CM CM CM *~ v ^- T— »— »— »— v*>' '
flR3057«*7
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TESTNO. 6
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; f «0)
. -
2.55 INCH.3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT .155.00 FTBGSTO 169.40 FTBGS172.10 FTBGSTO 250.50 FTBGS3.20 FTBGSTO 152.30 FTBGS
14.10 FT.426.30 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
17.30 FEET BELOW TOO409.00 FTMSL
406.83 FT426.29 FT19.47 FT423.75 FT
2.55 FT
22.03 MIN .44.63 MIN
• • • - . . , . • • ' i
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60 ' 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.09 1.10
950.00 SEC 950.00 SEClilSESislCM/S 5.71 E-06 CM/S '
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)JHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
0.03 GPM5.37
4.61E-06 CM/S
Golder Associates A ft 3 0 5 7 k Q
«- o - CM no «*• tn <o r 03 01 «- *- CM ^ •* m <oq q q q q q S q q q o -.--:-.-:-o o o cji o o oo 0 0 , 0 o o c:, o c:,
C±j> oiivy OV3H onnvyoAH NT
oCNQLJLJ
r-QiLJPQ_ E
000 2D tCO qQ- 8LJ z,
Q ft<UJt-LJ
O
Q«o m . • «t to CM . . • *- o5 5 5 5 5 5 5
(u) QV3H onnvyoAH
4R305750
toT
i
oP.+
•**:CMI
<0CMI
TABLE 1 ,SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TESTNO. 7
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
i
Z55 INCH3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT140.10 FTBGSTO 154.5fr FTBGS157.20 FTBGSTO 250.50 FTBGS3.40 FTBGSTO 137.40 FTBGS
6.00 FT418.20 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
I
9.40' FEET BELOW TOC408.80 FTMSL
408.97 FT397.26 FT11.70 FT400.72 FT3.46 FT
10.73 MIN31.57 MIN
- • _ - • \ / _ • ' ' . . .
SLUGTEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) ' . ,(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.08 ' 1.53
290.00 SEC ' 290.00 SEC: , 1 .60E-05 CM/S 8.54E-05 ' CM/S
f ' • • • ' - • • . •
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATE ' ' , -d(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dJLOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY ' '
0.04 GPM1.04
3.6BE-05 CM/S
OolderAnoclatei AR30575I
CO
i <P+
CM
I*;?
Cu> onvy ov3H onnvaaAH NT
AR305752
oCNQLJLJr-o:LJZ p{__ E
S«n
tct: 3LJ
co
< ILJIE
O
a:Q
I
oqdI
CM
T
<o ^^ o« 3
CM
CMI
GOCMI
r* <o m • **• fj CM »-9 9 9 9 999
QV3H
AR305753
U
U
TABLE1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TESTNO. 8
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICk-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 'HYDRAUUC HEAD AT SJART OF SLUG TEST (Hos) .MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
• . . . ' ' , " •'•' . ' •
SLUGTEST ,RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
. . . - • • . . . '
2.55 INCH .3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT125.10 FTBGSTO 139.50 FTBGS142.20 FTBGSTO 250.50 FTBGS3.10 FTBGSTO 122.40 FTBGS
6.00 FT'41&20 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
9.10 FEET BELOW TOC409.10 FTMSL
409.84 FT * '393.64 FT16.20 FTNA FTNA FT
10.20 MINNA MIN
" ' '.
TR2DATA . . TR4DATA1.82 ' 1.8068.00 SEC 68.00 SEC
lilSEisi?CM/S . 5.09E-04 CM/S •
NA GPM .NANA CM/S
Golder Associates AR 3 05751*
oCN
JTJ« ! . ' «oLJ
=itf>
CM.I- P00 £LJ t
\ < £LJ_c jso
CM
O «- 0* to • *h lO <O Is* CO Ct "" -» «^ W« » • • - • • » • • I " " *0 <f ° ° ° ° ? ? ? T T
Cu) onvy av3H onnvyaAH NT
TABLE1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?
WELL ED20TESTNO. 9
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE .ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
I
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HO ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor) .HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
• . - >
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2) '(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
/ ' " ' ,
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS,
AVERAGE FLOW RATECKHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/niHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
•
1 '\
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT105.10 FTBGSTO 119.50122.20 FTBGSTO 250.503.60 FTBGSTO 102.40
6.00 FT ,418.20 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
9.60 FEET BELOW TOO408.60 FTMSL
409.00 FT .396.56 FT12.44 FTNA FTNA FT
10.23 MINNA MIN
TR2DATA1.60 . 2.4022.00 SEC 22.00
lMiii£CM/& . Z34E-03
NA GPMNANA CM/S
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
SECCM/S
Golder Associates AR305756
'(J
9' 9
Ci-O ouvy dv3H onnvdQAH NT
AR305757
TABLE 1 • , . 'SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?
WELL ED20TESTNO. 10
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE-ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
• • ' . . ' " .
2.55 INCH.3.78 INCH
250.50 FT BGS
14.40 FT90.10 FTBGSTO 104.50 FTBGS107.20 FTBGSTO 250.50 FTBGS4.40 R BGS TO 87.40 FTBGS
6.00 FT418.20 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL.
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC407.80 FTMSL
408.44 FT395.52 FT12.92 FTNA FTNA FT
11.13 MINNA MIN
* - . - * • . *
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA2.55 3.3954.00 SEC 54.00 SEC
lll®i3filCM/S 1.33E-03 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNEH ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOQ(T/r)J .HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
OoldeiAitoclote.
oCMOLJ
LJ
o7!7
o0 ———— —————— ——— e
o
Q.
Xto
CM
CO
<P--
d • • • +1
•g0
o *^ CM, n + in « o r ^ cq oj *- —i i '-..?-• ? ? ? ? ' 7
Cu> oavw ov3H onnvaaAH NT
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TEST NO. 11
DRILL ROD DIAMETER . • "BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 'GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) .HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t: T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
. f
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT69.60 FTBGSTO 84.00
•; 86.70 FTBGSTO 250.504.50 FTBGSTO 66.90
6.50 FT418.70 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL
11.00 FEET BELOW TOC407.70 FTMSL "
408.28 FT .389.10 FT19.18 FTNA FTNA Ft
10.37 MINNA MtN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
' " . ' • • • • . • • ' - • • • • ' . • ' . . . - - • •SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS .
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ,
TR2DATA TR4DATA2.32 Z17
. 538.00 SEC 538.00liltiloll CM/S . 8.44E-05
SECCM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCnVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
I
Golder Associates AR305760
U
CO <h »- «- CM
OILVH qv3H onnvyoAH NT
AR30576 I
TABLE 1 . . ; • . . , .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL - ED20TESTNO. 12
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP 'TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
'
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
250.50 FT BGS
14.40 FT . ,54.10 FTBGSTO 68.5071.20 FTBGSTO 250.505.60 FTBGSTO 51.40
7.00 FT419.20 FTMSL.412.20 FTMSL
, 12.60 FEET BELOW TOO406.60 FTMSL
406.60 FT- 395.91 FT
10.69 FT397.79 FT
1.88 FT
10.50 MIN30.43 MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
/-
• ; ' i . . • : • • • • - . • • .
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
1
TR2 DATA TR4 DATA1.07 1.09
658.00 SEC 658.00lilliHI CM/S 7.52E-06
SECCM/S
" • . • . ' ' . 'RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS^
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG OVT)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVrrY
0.03 GPM .3.46
6.26E-06 CM/S
AR305762Golder Associates
i' 3
i )<
Ci-> ouva OV3H onnvyaAH NT
aR305763
OCNaLJLJ
LJ \CM
O - - 'O «n
COt
LJ
U
QX<o to ** 2 S3 3^9 9 9 9 9 9
Cu>
dI
GOdI
P-
T • 3 +00
CM
CMCMI.
CMI
KJ
AR305761*
u
TABLE1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED20TEST NO. 13
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND.SURFACE)
LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
/
2.55 INCH3.78 ! INCH
250.50 FTBGS
14.40 FT49.50 FTBGSTO 63.90 FTBGS66.60 FTBGSTO 250.50 FTBGS7.03 FTBGSTO 46.80 FTBGS
6.00 FT418.20 FTMSL412.20 FTMSL.
13.03 FEET BELOW TOG405.17 FTMSL
405.81 FT ,.394.83 FT10.98 FT397.18 FT8.63 FT
10.70 MIN27.17 MIN
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T!)x60 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA. 1.02 1.02290.00 SEC 290.00 SEC
iiii7£i|6l:CM/S ' 3.46E-06 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS < • ...
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULICHEAD)/cllLOG(T/r)l ;HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
0.14 GPM3.53
3.41E-05 CM/S
AR305765Golder Associates
5 8 3 S S 8° ? o o o o
CiJ> oava OV3H onnvyQAH NT
AR305766
CNQLJLJ
LJ
o <"LJ
LJXU
LJ
o;***(O z> t
o
CMI
COCM
Q • • • . ____L^ to CM »- o on co9 9 9 9 9 8 8
CLI) QV3H bnnvyoAH
COdI
CMI
AR305767
TABLE1 , , •SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIG TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. 1
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASJAK3)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD ATTHE BEGINING OF .SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
. ' f
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT273.60 FTBGSTO 293.00 FTBGS295.70 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS-2.50 FTBGSTO 275.90 FTBGS
2.50 Ft395.20 FT MSL332.70 FTMSL
0.00 FEET BELOW TOC395.20 FT MSL
395.34 FT •375.05 Ft23.59 FT378.00 FT2.95 FT
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0) 20.33 MINTEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T- O\ 37.83 MIN
• ' ' . ' , - ' .
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.
(Hi-Hiy(H!-H2) -(T2-T1)x60 'HYDRAUUC CONDUCnvrTY .
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.04 1.04
540.00 SEC 540.00 SECii:15l-HD6lCM/S 4.04E-06 CM/S
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T))HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ,
0.04 GPMNA . ' . ' • . . . • -NA CM/S :
Colder Associates AR305768
^ C M » O ^ - O < O f ^q q q q q q q .d d d d d d d d d T o o o o o o o o ol l l l l l l I l l t l l l l l l l
Cu> OLLva OV3H onnvaaAH NT
AR305769
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. - • 2
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD ATTHE BEGININQ OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY _
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNEH ANALYSIS '••/
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dJLOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
. . .
2.55 INCH3.78' INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT254.60 FTBGSTO 269.00 FTBGS271.70 FTBGSTO 300.0Q FTBGS
1.36 Ft BGS TO 251.90 FTBGS
4.70 FT397.40 FTMSL332.70 FTMSL
6.06 FEET BELOW TOC391.34 FTMSL
400.41 FT393.12 FT
7.29 FTNA FTNA Ft
46.20 MINNA MIN
TR2DATA TR4DATA. 1.49 1.76
12.00 SEC 12.00 SECllilli)3lCM/S ' Z76E-03 CM/S .
• , • • '
NA GPMNA . 'NA CM/S
1 7
I
IO
CO Oj *-
d ? ••••«?" ? ? ? '
(U> OLLVW OV3H OITOVyQAH NT
AR30577I
TABLE 1 -SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24 . . ,TESTNO. 3
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi>HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THEBEGINJNG OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DfFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T-0)
/
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT244.30 FT BGS TO 258.70261.40 FTBGSTO 200.00-2.50 FTBGSTO 241.60
16.80 FT409.50 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL
14.30 FEET BELOW TOC395.20 FTMSL
397.55 FT380.12 FT20.74 FTNA FTNA FT
20.40 MIN .15.50 MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA2.04 2.1358.00 SEC 53.00
mtigmOMS 7.63E-04SECCM/S
i . . • . . •
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS. -
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULlC HEAD) / dlLOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTtVrTY
\
NA 6PMNANA CM/S
GolderAjsodate, ftR305772
. . .(JLd) OllVd OV3H OnnvyOAH NT
AR305773
TABLE 1 . •SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGJC TEST RESULT?
WELL ED24TESTNO. 4
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVELSTICK-UP %TOP OF CASING ELEVATION .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
• • '. iTEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T » 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0)
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HJ-H2)(T2-T!)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS,
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d(LOG (T/T)JHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
200.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT229.30 FTBGSTO 243.70 FTBGS246.40 FTBGSTO 200.00 FTBGS-2.50 FTBGSTO 226.60 FTBGS
6.80 FT399.50 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL.
4.30 FEET BELOW TOC395.20 FTMSL
396.12 FT381.16 FT .18.26 FT .NA FTNA FT
9.53 MIN. 28.43 MIN
• ' ' . . .
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.03 1.03
360.00 SEC 360.00 SEC4.63E-06 CM/S ;! 4.1 8E-OS: CM/S
. . - . ' ' •
NA GPMNANA CM/S .'
Golder Associate. AR30577V
o o o o o o o oo o o o o
Cu> OLLVW OV3H onnvyaAH NT
AR305775
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?
WELL ED24TESTNO. 5
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP .TOP OF CASING ELEVATION .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi . Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGJNING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGJNING OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0
' . ' '
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT214.30 FTBGSTO 228.70231.40 FTBGSTO 300.00'-1.30 FT BGS tO 211.60
-6.80 FT '399.50 FTMSL .392.70 FTMSL
5.50 FEETBELOWTOC394.00 FTMSL
396.64 FT . '377.68 FT22.26 FTNA FTNA FT
27,17 MINNA MIN
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
•-. •' '
' • ' • • • ' ' ' ' . " • ' '
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(HI-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY •
TR2DATA . TR4DATAZ60 2.27
120,00 SEC 120.00l EWlCM/S 4.01E-04
\
SECCM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG '(T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CKVS
Colder Associates ftR305776
OLJ) diva ov3H onnvaaAH NTRR305777
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. 6
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -,Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (l: T-0)
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT .201.80 FTBGSTO 216.20 FTBGS218.90 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS6.10 FTBGSTO 199.10 FTBGS
4.30 FT397.00 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC ,386.60 FTMSL
389.13 FT •362.35 FT26.79 FTNA FTNA FT
16JO MINNA MIN
• " ;
SLUGTEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.06 1.04 /
1020.00 SEC 1020.00 SECiliigiliCM/S 2.20E-06 CM/S
• .-,. . . 'RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS '
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dfLOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
AR3d5778Golder Associates . ««/ /o
O t- CM 10o o o o qo o q' ' • ' t f. .CLJ) oiivy QV3H onnvyaAH NI
AR305779
j»j 53-oi »
la • •••*2E pj IF H oO
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL " ED24TESTNO. 7
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE ,ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor).HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
. . ;
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT184.60 FTBGSTO 199.00 FTBGS201.70 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS6.10 FTBGSTO 181.90 FTBGS
4.30 FT397.00 FT.MSL392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC386.60 FTMSL .
411,17 FT386.09 FT25.09 FTNA FTNA FT
14.63 MINNA MIN .
'
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA . TR4DATAZ55 NA48.00 SEC NA SEC
liisllilcM/s . . NA CM/SRECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
'•fl'fi'30578.6-Golder Associates
It.idCMQLU
LU oen
00UJ
< tUJ *
O
CO -Ko:
7
Cu) onvy QV3H onnvdSjw riSr " '
5.5
5.9 IME (
'+•:'
T
lder As
14 TI
4.7
4.5
CM *0 in «D r « en' ' '
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. 8
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP •TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
•' ;.- -. . ' ;• '
2.55 INCH ';3.78 INCH
300.00 FT BGS
14.40 FT169.10 FTBGSTO 183.50186.20 FTBGSTO 300.00
3.40 FTBGSTO 166.40
7.00 FT399.70 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOO389.30 1 FTMSL
388.19 FT376.51 FT11.68 FTNA FTNA FT
16.57 MIN ' ' ,NA MIN
FT.BGSFt BGSFTBGS
- •
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.15 1.10
270.00 SEC 270.00mmCM/S 2.02E-05
SECCM/S
. . . . . . . • ,RECOVERYTEST .RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / dlLOG-(T/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
Golder<Assoctates
u
BOr ^ T - T - T - » ^ » - T - T - c
f.f f T'Tf f-T'T' .'
OliVu-qvaH onnvyoAH N~i
AR305783
TABLE 1SUMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL' 'TESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OFTESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OFDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERYTEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor) .
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t: T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
SLUGTEST :RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
ED2411
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS• t . ,
14.40 FT139.10 FTBGST 153.50 FTBGS153.50 FTBGST 300.00 FTBGS-ZOO FT BGS T 1 36.40 FT BGS
2.50 FT395.20 FTMSL ,392.70 FTMSL
0.50 FEET BELOW TOC394.70 FTMSL
393.20 FT394.51 FT9.98 FT
405.75 FT11.24 FT
39.90 MINNA MIN
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.89 2.0136.00 SEC 36.00 SEC
f$||;!!! CM/S 1.14E-03 CM/S
ERR GPMERRERR CM/S
Golder Associates _ — n •AR3G578U
C\J
LUr "X
:tinto
LUt
oi. 00 2LU ~
O &LJ
00d
ID
I <rsi ^
" I+ o
ojd
o *- 04 ro •. • •' in uj r^ oq o> <- - *- ojdo' d d odd d d ' ^ ^l i l , l l l l l l I I
O •:. • • -' .; . '/;'V '. : • • -") : . . ' • • • . . . • •
• . . (u) oiivy OV3H onnvaQAH NI • •
TABLE 1 . . - • . - .SUMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL • , . 'TESTNO.
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTED .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OFDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
€D2412
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT124.10 FT BGST 138.50 FT BGS293.00 FTBGST 300.00 FTBGS-2.00 FTBGST 121.40 FTBGS
2.50 FT395.20 FTM'SL392,70 FTMSL
0.50 FEETBELOWTOC394.70 FTMSL
395.39 FT380.95 FT16.75 FTNA FTNA FT
1.50 MINNA MIN
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVOHSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA2.10 • £2748.00 SEC ' 48.00 SEC
;9XWE-04 :CM/S 1.00E-03 CM/S
RECOVERYTEST .RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / dfLOG (T/T)JHYDRAULIC CCWDUCTWTY
NA GPM ,NA -NA CM/S
Golder Associates AR305786
d d do d .d odd '..!" I I
I < 1CM <
+ 6
(u) ouva av3H onnvaoAH NI
4R305787
TABLE 1SUMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL . .TESTNO. • , • •
DRILL ROD DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTH IhSltDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OFDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION -
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HQHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos),MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINJNG OF SLUG TEST (t: T-0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T -
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60 • 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTrvrTY
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULJC HEAD)/dlLOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
ED24'13
2.55 INCH '3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT113.10 FTBGST 127.50293.00 FTBGST 300.00-ZOO FTBGST 110.40
2.50 FT.395.20 FTMSL39Z70 FTMSL
0.50 FEET BELOW TOC394.70 FT MSL
\394.78 FT385.29 FT20.79 FTNA FTNA FT
' 3.10 MINNA MIN '
TR2DATA . TR4DATA2.30 2.11
484.00 SEC . 434.00i$iI-fc4S CM/S 9.05E-05
. NA GPMNA.NA CM/S
FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS
- *
SECCM/S
-
Golder Associates 4R305788
C\JI I V—u«
CN
LU gt
*«=O 'ti
___________A00
L^ ™ CN -' fo ** iO - o r - oo o
d d' d d , d- o" d d dI I l l l I I I l
(ij) oiivy av3H onnvyqAH NT
flR305789
00
^ <
CN
TABLE!SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. 14
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER :BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION .
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (l; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
1
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT101.10 FTBGSTO 115.50 FTBGS118.20 FT BGS TO 300.00 FTBGS7.40 FTBGSTO 98.40 FTBGS
3.00 FT395.70 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC385.30 FTMSL
384.85 FT362.79 FT22.06 FT ,NA FTNA FT
15.63 MINNA MIN
' ' ' t
SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
• . / '
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) .(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY i
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.07 1.05
738.00 SEC 738.00 SEC5 3E-06:CM/S 3.86E-06 CM/S'
\ '
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dJLOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
'-_, . « AR305790Golder Associates
J »J J1}o1 1
oO
CLJ) onvy QV3H onnvyaAH
TABLETSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. 15
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER -BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTED . vDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UP ( ' . ,'TOP OF CASING ELEVATION •GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION ~
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TESt (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF. RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT83.40 FTBGSTO 97.80 FTBGS100.50 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS
7.75 FTBGSTO 80.70 FTBGS
2.65 FT395.35 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC384.95 FTMSL
383.62 FT .369.35 FT14.26 FTNA FTNA FT
38.80 MINNA MIN
SLUGTEST ;RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) ,(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY >
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.86 1.6350.00 SEC 50.00 SEC
iS E-M-CM/S ' 5.76E-04 CM/S
RECOVERYTEST .RESULTS OF HORNEH ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD)/d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
ftR305792l • ,
Golder Associates
CMQ
gCO t
o:
o ( | ^ ,jn* g
CO
4O.6
40.2
39.8 IN)
A T4
TIME
T2
Golder A
3938.6
O • • «•; oj iq ^ iO! iq fx q en T-' f i ? . f T f " ' 'oiivy QV3H onnvyaAH
AR305793
TABLE 1 ,SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TESTNO. 16 .
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLEDIAMETER ' .BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
' t - -
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT.. 65.10 FTBGSTO 79.50 FTBGS82.20 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS7.40 FTBGSTO 62.40 FTBGS
3.00 FT , •. 395.70 FTMSL '392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC385.30 FTMSL
384.21 FT366.50 FT • ,17471 FT 'NA FT .NA FT
63.53 MINNA MIN
• ' . ' . ' " " ' • ' ' - . . ' • • •
SLUGTEST ,RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hl)/(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA , TR4DATA1.89 . "1.69
290.00 SEC 290.00 SEC11:!2SElJ4lCM/S ' 1.06E-04 CM/S
RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEcKHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPM'.. NA
NA CM/S
AR30579U
T
oiivy Q\?SH onnvyoAHAR305795
.1o
TABLETSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24 <TEST NO. 17
DRILL ROD DIAMETER £55 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 3.78 INCHBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE) 300.00 FTBGS
LENGTHTESTED . 14.40 FTDEPTH (RANGE OF TESTED ZONE 50.10 FTBGSTO 64.50 FTBGSZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 67.20 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGSZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL 4.40 FTBGSTO 47.40 FTBGS
STICK-UP 6.00 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 39B.70 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 392.70 FTMSL
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 10.40 FEET BELOW TOCGROUNDWATER ELEVATION 388.30 FTMSL
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi) 388.90 FT .HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 366.83 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 22.06 FTHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor) NA FTHYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos-Hor) NA FT
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0) 0.70 MINELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T-0)_____- NA MIN____________•_
SLUGTEST .RESULTS OF HVORSL V ANALYSIS.
(Hi-H1)/(Hi-H2) '(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.11 • NA
1080.00 SEC NA SECili&iiiicM/s . NA CM/SRECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATE ,d(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNANA CM/S
AR305796Golder Associates
t.1)
o • -- CM _ ^U t " C J « * - ' . « - « I J » - » « K « r t » " ; T - T - T -
? f -f'-T T'T'T'f •-??••• ',-'? T 'f'f
Cu) onvy QV3H onnvyaAH
AR30S797
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS
WELL ED24TEST NO. 18
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF'CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONDEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0) .ELAPSED TIMETO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)
, ' " • " .
£55 INCtt .'.'-•'.3.78 INCH . ' ' ' .
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT22.10 FTBGSTO 36.50 FTBGS39.20 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS7.40 FT BGS TO 1 9.40 FT BGS
3.00 FT395.70 FTMSL
. 392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC. 385.30 FTMSL
384.24 FT375.58 FT8.66 FTNA FT •NA FT
82.83 MIN, NA MIN
' ' ' . ' ' '
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) " ' • - . - .(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.09 NA
370.00 SEC NA SECII135P3IICM/S . NA CM/S
• . ' • . '*"RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS
AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)JHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
NA GPMNA . iNA CM/S
flfi30S798Golder Associates
(Q CT r- T- CM rOO
CM) "oiiya QV3H onnvyQAHflR305799
TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?
WELL ED24TEST NO. 19
DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)
LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL
STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION ' .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)
ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T-0) .
\ . •
2.55 INCH3.78 INCH
300.00 FTBGS
14.40 FT37.10 FTBGSTO 51.50 FTBGS54.20 FTBGSTO 300.00 FTBGS6.40 FTBGSTO ,34.40 FTBGS
I
-4.00 FT396.70 FTMSL392.70 FTMSL
10.40 FEET BELOW TOC386.30 FTMSL
385.67 FT377.57 FT8.10 FTNA FTNA FT • - .
14.37 MINNA MIN
••: , - . 1 . -
SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS
(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
TR2DATA TR4DATA1.80 NA
180.00 SEC NA SECililliiilcM/s NA CM/S
• - . - • • • . • \ . . .RECOVEHYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.
AVERAGE FLOW RATEcKHYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY
' . i
NA GPMNANA CM/S
48305800Oolder Awoclates « « u u