Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
10G10G--EPON Standardization and EPON Standardization and
Its Development StatusIts Development Status
Keiji Tanaka
KDDI R&D Laboratories Inc.
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1.1. Background and motivation Background and motivation
2.2. IEEE 802.3av standardizationIEEE 802.3av standardization
3.3. Research activitiesResearch activities
4.4. Development statusDevelopment status
5.5. SummarySummary
OutlineOutline
NThC4.pdf
© 2009 OSA/OFC/NFOEC 2009
978-1-55752-865-0/09/$25.00 ©2009 IEEE
2
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1.1. Background and motivation Background and motivation (a)(a) FTTH growth in JapanFTTH growth in Japan(b)(b) FTTH systemsFTTH systems(c)(c) Why 10GWhy 10G--EPON necessary?EPON necessary?(d)(d) When 10GWhen 10G--EPON feasible?EPON feasible?
2.2. IEEE 802.3av standardizationIEEE 802.3av standardization
3.3. Research activitiesResearch activities
4.4. Development statusDevelopment status
5.5. SummarySummary
OutlineOutline
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
FTTH growth in JapanFTTH growth in Japan
Num
ber o
f bro
adba
nd u
sers
[M
illio
n]
0
5
10
15
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications statistiSource: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications statistics databasecs database
CATV
FTTH
DSL
‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10
20
Year
Shifted to decrease
The number of FTTH lines, more than 13 million at the end of Sep. 2008, exceeded the number of DSL lines in 2Q/2008.
Statistics as of Sep. 2008Statistics as of Sep. 2008Statistics as of Sep. 2008
� Number of lines: FTTH: 13.8 MDSL: 12.0 MCATV: 4.0 M(Mobile: 92.0 M)
� Number of operators:FTTH: 171DSL: 47CATV: 381
3
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Flavors of FTTH systemsFlavors of FTTH systems
Media converterMedia converter
PONPON--OLTOLT
Single star
Passive double star
100Mbit/sor
1Gbit/s
Optical fiberOptical fiber PONPON
ApartmentApartment
Residential houseResidential houseCOCO
VDSL DSLAM
VDSLCPE
Data rateData rate(Bandwidth)(Bandwidth)
EfficiencyEfficiency
SSSSWDMWDM--PONPON
TDMTDM--PONPON
HighHigh
HighHigh
Optical access systemOptical access systemOptical access system
Media converter
Power splitter
Power splitter
SSSS
Power splitter
PON topology is suitable for accommodating a lot of users and diPON topology is suitable for accommodating a lot of users and distributing stributing broadcasting video services.broadcasting video services.
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Why 10GWhy 10G--EPON necessary?EPON necessary?
Why 10Gbps?
Optical feeders with bandwidth of ~10Gbps are necessary for Optical feeders with bandwidth of ~10Gbps are necessary for � Advanced video services� Multi-service platform to accommodate MDUs and mobile APs
Why PON?
PON reduces CAPEX and OPEX PON reduces CAPEX and OPEX � Accommodates a large number of FTTx users and mobile APs efficiently� Reduces the footprint and power consumption of CO equipment� Reduces fiber deployment and repair cost
4
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Digital televisionDigital television
CFI, March 2006, IEEE802.3CFI, March 2006, IEEE802.3
Access network must grow beyond 1Gbps to provide advanced video Access network must grow beyond 1Gbps to provide advanced video services such as digital cinema.services such as digital cinema.
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
MultiMulti--service platformservice platform
CableCable
Residential usersResidential users��HDTVHDTV��
Business usersBusiness users((GbEGbE, 10GbE), 10GbE)
ApartmentApartment
CMTS
10G-EPONONU
10G-EPONOLT
10G-EPONONU
10G-EPONONU
xDSLxDSL
LTE, LTE, WiFiWiFi, , WiMAXWiMAX
BusinessBusinessBusiness
ConsumerConsumerConsumer
-- FTTxFTTx-- xDSLxDSL-- CableCable
3.5G3.5G--mobilemobile
DSLAM
10G-EPONONU
Wireless back-haulWireless backWireless back--haulhaul
Next-generation access is expected to work as a multi-service platform in which multiple dwelling units (MDUs) and wireless access points (APs) are accommodated to reduce CAPEX and OPEX of the infrastructure.
A large bandwidth is required for nextA large bandwidth is required for next--generation access network. generation access network.
5
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
When 10GWhen 10G--EPON feasible?EPON feasible?
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20151M
10M
100M
1G
10G
Tran
smis
sion
rate
[bp
s]
10Base-T
100Base-T
10GBase-T/LRM
100GBase
1000Base-X/T
10GBase-X/R/W
100G
1T
Year
ADSL
FTTH
10G-EPONNGA-1
Ethernet
NGA-2
10G-EPON would be commercially feasible in 2011~2012, judging from the speed evolution of Ethernet and commercial FTTH services.
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1.1. Background and motivationBackground and motivation
2.2. IEEE 802.3av standardizationIEEE 802.3av standardization(a)(a) Overview of PONOverview of PON(b)(b) EPON layering diagramEPON layering diagram(c)(c) Overview of IEEE 802.3av projectOverview of IEEE 802.3av project(d)(d) AdAd--hoc activities in IEEE 802.3avhoc activities in IEEE 802.3av(e)(e) NextNext--generation access in ITUgeneration access in ITU--T T
3.3. Research activitiesResearch activities
4.4. Development statusDevelopment status
5.5. SummarySummary
OutlineOutline
6
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1 2 3
11
22
33
���
1 2 3
�
�
1
2
3
�
1
2
3
1
�
2
�
3
�
OLTOLT
ONUONU
ONUONU
ONUONU
Each ONU sends frames within assigned timeslot.Each ONU sends frames within assigned timeslot.All frames are broadcast
to each branch.All frames are broadcast to each branch.
Each ONU extracts the frames destined to each ONU selectively. (Other frames are discarded.)Each ONU extracts the frames destined to each ONU selectively. (Other frames are discarded.)
1300 1400 1500 1600
1260-1360nm
Wavelength(nm)
1480-1500nmUpstreamUpstream
Wavelength allocation in E-/B-/G-PON systemsWavelength allocation in EWavelength allocation in E--/B/B--/G/G--PON systemsPON systems
DownstreamDownstream
Operation of TDMOperation of TDM--based PONbased PON
Downstream
Upstream
COCO
CustomerCustomerPremisePremise
All frames are aligned so as to avoid collision.
Bidirectional transmission over single optical fiber
To split and combine optical signals
Optical splitterOptical splitter
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Flavors of Flavors of PONsPONs
ONUONUOLTOLT
Ethernet frame
ATM cell
ONUONUOLTOLTEthernet frameEthernet frame
GTC frame
GEM frame
125 �s
ONUONUOLTOLT
Ethernet frameEthernet frameEthernet frame
ATM cell (53 byte)ATM cell (53 byte)
A fixedA fixed--length GTC frame consists length GTC frame consists of ATM cells and GEM frames.of ATM cells and GEM frames.
Frames except ATM cells Frames except ATM cells are contained in variableare contained in variable--
length GEM framelength GEM frame
EPON (IEEE)EPON (IEEE)
BB--PON (ITUPON (ITU--T)T)
GG--PON (ITUPON (ITU--T)T)
GEM: G-PON encapsulation methodGTC: G-PON transmission convergence
7
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
IEEE802.3 layering diagramIEEE802.3 layering diagram
PhysicalPhysical
Data LinkData Link
NetworkNetwork
TransportTransport
SessionSession
PresentationPresentation
ApplicationApplication
OSI Reference model IEEE 802.3 Layering diagram
MediumMedium
Physical Medium Dependent (PMD)Physical Medium Dependent (PMD)
Physical Medium Attachment (PMA)Physical Medium Attachment (PMA)
Physical Coding Sublayer (PCS)Physical Coding Sublayer (PCS)
ReconciliationReconciliation
Media Access Control (MAC)Media Access Control (MAC)
MAC ControlMAC Control
Logical Link ControlLogical Link Control
Scope of Scope of IEEE802.3 IEEE802.3
� IEEE 802.3 only covers physical layer and a portion of data link layer.� IEEE 802.3av mainly focuses on physical layer (PMD, PMA, PCS, and RS).
To be exact, IEEE802.3av slightly covers a portion of data link layer (MPCP).
Main scope ofMain scope ofIEEE 802.3avIEEE 802.3av
Gigabit Media Independent Interface (GMII)
Medium Dependent Interface (DMI)
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
EPON layering diagramEPON layering diagram
OLTOLTLLID #1 LLID #N
PMDPMDPMAPMAPCSPCS
RSRS
MACMACMPCPMPCP
OAM OAM
Mac ClientMac Client
PMDPMDPMAPMAPCSPCS
RSRS
MACMACMPCPMPCP
OAM OAM
Mac ClientMac Client
PCSPCS
RSRS
PMAPMA
PMDPMD
MACMACMACMACMPCPMPCP
OAM OAM OAM OAM Mac ClientMac Client Mac ClientMac Client
Optical fiberOptical fiberOptical fiber Optical fiberOptical fiberOptical fiberOptical splitterOptical splitterOptical splitter
ONU#1ONU#1 ONU#NONU#N
Logical link layer topology is point-to-point with the use of logical link IDs (LLIDs), although physical media topology is point-to-multipoint.
PointPoint--toto--pointpoint
PointPoint--toto--multipointmultipoint
8
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Frame format in EPONFrame format in EPON
Preamble / SFDPreamble / SFD DestinationDestinationAddressAddress
SourceSourceAddressAddress TypeType DataData FCSFCS
0x550x55 0x550x55 0x550x55 0x550x55 0x550x55 0x550x55 0x550x55 0xd50xd5
0x550x55 0x550x55
EthernetEthernetEthernet
EPONEPONEPON SFD: Start of Frame DelimiterFCS: Frame Check SequenceSLD: Start of LLID DelimiterLLID: Logical Link IdentifierCRC8:8bit Cyclic Redundancy Check
8 octet 6 6 2 46 1500 4
0xd50xd5 0x550x55 0x550x55 LLIDLLID LLIDLLID CRC8CRC8
SLD
SFD
Format of frame preamble in EPON
LLID for logical topology emulation is embedded in the preamble portion of Ethernet frame (IEEE802.3 frame).
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
IEEE802.3av projectIEEE802.3av project
CFI : Call For Interest
What 10G-EPON ?
10x higher10x higher--speedspeed standard of IEEE802.3 EPON� IEEE 802.3av mainly focuses on physical layer for 10Gbps transmission.
(Formerly named “10Gbps PHY for EPON” )� Frame format, MAC, OAM are basically the same as IEEE802.3 EPON.
PAR : Project Authorization Request
Timeline
2006 20082007 2009
P802.3avP802.3av
Draft1.0 Draft2.0 Draft3.0 StdCFI PAR Draft0.9
Study Study GroupGroup Task force
Projectstart
Baseline proposal
1st draft Last feature
Last tech. change
Expected standard approval : September 2009Expected standard approval : September 2009
9
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Objectives of IEEE802.3avObjectives of IEEE802.3av
�� Support subscriber access networks using point to multipoint topSupport subscriber access networks using point to multipoint topology on optical fiberology on optical fiber
�� PHYsPHYs to have a BER better than or equal to 10to have a BER better than or equal to 10--1212 at the PHY service interfaceat the PHY service interface
�� Provide physical layer specificationProvide physical layer specification��-- PHY for PON, 10Gbps downstream / 1Gbps upstream, single SM fibePHY for PON, 10Gbps downstream / 1Gbps upstream, single SM fiberr-- PHY for PON, 10Gbps downstream / 10Gbps upstream, single SM fibPHY for PON, 10Gbps downstream / 10Gbps upstream, single SM fiberer
�� Define up to 3 optical power budgets that support split ratios oDefine up to 3 optical power budgets that support split ratios of 1:16 and 1: 32, and f 1:16 and 1: 32, and distances of at least 10 and at least 20 km.distances of at least 10 and at least 20 km.
PR30 , PRX30PR20 , PRX2020kmPR20 , PRX20PR10 , PRX1010km
1:321:16
Fully compatible with existing Fully compatible with existing ODNsODNs
Asymmetric 10GAsymmetric 10G--EPONEPON Symmetric 10GSymmetric 10G--EPONEPON
10Gbps 10Gbps
10Gbps1Gbps
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
CoCo--existenceexistence
Co-existence issues are seriously considered in IEEE802.3av specifications: � Co-exist with deployed systems of 1G-EPON and RF video on the same ODN� Reuse of deployed optical distribution network (ODN)
(1) To co-exist with 1G-EPON and RF video, the followings are adopted: - Downstream : WDM (L-band)- Upstream : 10G/1G dual-rate TDMA
(2) For the reuse of deployed ODN, a new power budget class is specified: - PR/PRX30 (Loss budget : 29dB)
VV--ONUONU
1G1G//1G1GONUONU
10G10G//1G1GONUONU
10G10G//10G10GONUONUPONPON--OLTOLT
RFRF--VideoVideo
DualDual--raterateBurst RxBurst Rx
RF-Video (1.55mm)
10G (L-band)
1G (1.49mm)
10G(1.27mm)1G(1.31mm)
Downstream
Upstream
10
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Main differences between 1GMain differences between 1G-- and 10Gand 10G--EPONEPON
1:16 / 1:32 (*1)1:16split ratio
mandatory RS(255, 223)
option RS(255, 239)
FEC
3(PR10 / PR20 / PR30)
2(PX10 / PX20)
# of power budget class
1575 ~ 1580 nm1480 ~ 1500 nmDS
US 1260 ~ 1280 nm (*2)1260 ~ 1360 nmwavelength
data rate (DS/US)10G/10G-symmetric
+ 10G/1G-asymmetric
64B66B(3%)
10G-EPON
1G/1Gbps-symmetric
8B10B(25%)
1G-EPON
channel coding(coding overhead)
(*1) only for PR/PRX30(*2) asymmetric 10G-EPON : 1260 ~ 1360 nm
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
P802.3avP802.3avDraft1.0 Draft2.0 Draft3.0 StdCFI PAR Draft0.9
AdAd--hoc activities in IEEE802.3avhoc activities in IEEE802.3av
Task ForceStudy Study GroupGroup
Wavelength AllocationWavelength Allocation
FEC FramingFEC Framing
HighHigh--splitsplit
Rate Increase AnalysisRate Increase Analysis
DualDual--rate PMDrate PMD
Jitter BudgetJitter Budget
Power SavingPower Saving
Power BudgetPower Budget
Power BudgetPower Budget
FECFEC
WavelengthWavelength
OthersOthers
2006 2008 20092007
11
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Power budget (1)Power budget (1)
2006 2008 20092007
P802.3avP802.3av Draft1.0 Draft2.0 Draft3.0 StdCFI PAR Draft0.9
Task ForceStudy Study GroupGroup
Power BudgetPower Budget Long discussion on PR30 technologies
Parameter modifications
Main point of the argument : Main point of the argument : technologies for PR/PRX30 classtechnologies for PR/PRX30 class
(1) PIN-PD@ONU (w/o optical amp.@OLT)(2) APD@ONU (high-power EML@OLT)
Total optics cost
Two solutions were considered:
APD@ONU solution was adopted for PR/PRX30.
� Lower output power solution at OLT is preferable in terms of safety and crosstalk to RF-video systems
� Small footprint at OLT
3av_0709_hamano_1.pdf, IEEE 10G3av_0709_hamano_1.pdf, IEEE 10G--EPON Task ForceEPON Task Force
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Power budget (2)Power budget (2)
HP-DMLHP-DML
DMLDML
DMLDML
APD w/ FECAPD w/ FEC
APD w/ FECAPD w/ FEC
APD w/ FECAPD w/ FEC
EML+AmpEML+Amp
HP-EMLHP-EML
APD w/ FECAPD w/ FEC
PIN w/ FECPIN w/ FEC
PIN w/ FECPIN w/ FEC
-28.5
+5 -20.5
+2 -20.5
25.5 dB
22.5 dB
+4 -28
-1 -28
-1 -24
32 dB
27 dB
23 dB
HP-EMLHP-EML +230.5 dBPR30
PR20
PR10
PR30
PR20
PR10
l = 1575 ~ 1580 nm
l = 1260 ~ 1280 nm
HP : High Power
HP : High Power
(1.5dB-Penely included)
(1.5dB)
(2.5dB)
(3dB-Penely included)
(3dB)
(3dB)
Downstream
Upstream
12
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Power budget (3)Power budget (3)
23273222.525.530.5Power budget [dB]
DMLDMLDMLEMLEML+SOAEMLTransmitter type
+4-1-1+2+5+2Tx min [dBm]
+9+4+4+5+9+5Tx max [dBm]
APDAPDAPDAPDPINPINReceiver type
666666ER [dB]
292420292420CIL [dB](*1)
-28-28-24-28.5-20.5-20.5Sens. [dBm]
PR30PR20PR10PR30PR20PR10
UpstreamDownstream
(*1) channel insertion loss (CIL) = power budget – path penalties
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
FECFEC
decoder
encoder
Circuit size(*1)
1681
1.1x10-31.8x10-41.8x10-4Required BERfor BER=10-12
25131.5
7.2 dG5.9 dB5.9 dBElectrical coding gain
10 Gbps10 Gbps1 GpbsBit rate
RS(255,223)RS(255,239)Code
RS(255,239) vs. RS(255, 223) Decoded BER characteristics
FEC was considered mandatory for 10G-EPON systems to relax optical transceiver specifications. In terms of practicality and simplicity, RS(255, 223) was chosen because additional 1 dB optical gain to conventional RS(255, 239) is necessary for PR/PRX30 power budget classes.
RS(255, 223) was adopted to obtain enough power margin for PR/PRX30.
(*1) 3av_0709_mandin_2.pdf, IEEE 10G3av_0709_mandin_2.pdf, IEEE 10G--EPON Task ForceEPON Task Force
13
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Wavelength allocation (1)Wavelength allocation (1)
Cut-off wavelength
Possible DS wavelength : L-band
Restricted by the blocking filter property (G.984.5)
GE-PON (US) GE-PON (DS) Video OTDR
1.21 1.26 1.31 1.36 1.41 1.46 1.51 1.56 1.61 1.66 l
Possible Wavelength for 10G-EPON systems
Restricted by wavelength separation filter property
2006 2008 20092007
Wavelength AllocationWavelength Allocation Upstream
DownstreamPR10/20
PR30
Draft1.0 Draft2.0 Draft3.0 StdCFI PAR Draft0.9
Study Study groupgroup Task forceP802.3avP802.3av
1260~80
L-band1580~1600
1574~80 1574~80 1575~80
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Wavelength allocation (2) : upstreamWavelength allocation (2) : upstream
Power penalties at 1.3�m-band
3av_0705_effenberger_3.pdf, IEEE 10G3av_0705_effenberger_3.pdf, IEEE 10G--EPON Task ForceEPON Task Force
Wavelength band in G.984.enh (G.985)
� FP-LD is not applicable to 10G-ONU even at 1.3�m-band.
A 20-nm bandwidth is enough for 10G-upstream wavelength band on the condition that DFB-LDs are adopted.
A 20-nm bandwidth is enough for 10G-upstream wavelength band on the condition that DFB-LDs are adopted.
� It is preferable that 10G-EPON PHYs are identical to ITU-T specifications.
� Dispersion penalty should be minimized.
1.26 1.28 1.36
PR10/20/30
20nm
�
Upstream wavelength band
100nm
PRX10/20/30
14
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Wavelength allocation (3) : downstreamWavelength allocation (3) : downstream
Isolation : 35dB
1550
Guard band of BPF
1575
Video
1560 �1580
Downstream wavelength bandDownstream wavelength band
The specification of BPF in ONU to separate RF video signal:
�� The shortest wavelengthThe shortest wavelength is bound by the characteristics of the optical BPF. The guard band of the filter should be longer than 15nm.
Downstream wavelength band
1575 ~ 1580nm1575 ~ 1580nm for all PMD classes
�� The longest wavelengthThe longest wavelength is bound by conventional ITU-T recommendations such as G.982 and 983, in which the signal wavelength range shall be less than 1580nm. In addition, OTDR filter problem, which is operator-specific one, is not expected in this wavelength range
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Tx Rx
RS
PCS
PMA
PMD
1G@1490nm
1G@1490nm
DualDual--rate PMD (1)rate PMD (1)
XGMII
802.3ah sublayers
802.3av sublayers
10G/1GMAC
1Gb/s Tx
Path
1Gb/s Rx
Path
10G/10GMAC
1G/1GMAC
Tx Rx
10Gb/s Tx
Path
10Gb/s Rx
Path
GMII
10G@1577nm
10G@1577nm
PCS and RS for dual-rate mode at OLT
RS maps downstream data from MAC instances to appropriate downstream path according to LLID. The operation for upstream data is similar to downstream direction.
Three kinds of MACs of 1G/1G, 10G/1G and 10G/10G are supported.
10G/1G@1270nm/1310nm
10G/1G@1270nm/1310nm
As dualAs dual--rate PMD, two solutions are considered.rate PMD, two solutions are considered.
15
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
10G TIA and LA
optical amplifier (optional)
1x2 splitter
DualDual--rate PMD (2)rate PMD (2)
10G detector
The incoming dual-rate signals from ONUs to PMD at OLT can be split in (a) optical domain, or (b) electrical domain.
1G TIA and LA1G detector
Dual-rate PD
Dual-rate TIA
1G LA
10G LA
Optical domain Electrical domain
� 3dB-loss in 1x2 splitter- Acceptable in PR10/20- Challenging in PR30
� Two dedicated Rx circuits
� Simple configuration� PD and TIA cope with both data
rates in quick succession, switching 1G and 10G bursts.
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
NextNext--generation access in ITUgeneration access in ITU--TT
The development of next-generation access (NGA) standards will be held in the next ITU-T study period from 2009 to 2012.
ITUITU--TTFSANFSAN
Existing ODN (no replacement and additional component)Existing ODN (no replacement and additional component)ODNODN
New ODNNew ODN
B/G-PON
Extended reach
TDM XG-PON(US: 2.5, 5, 10G / DS: 10G)
WDM overlay G-PON (US: 2.5, 5, 10G / DS: 10G)
Higher rate TDMDWDMOFDM…etc
NowNow ~2010~2010 ~2015~2015
NGA1NGA1 NGA2NGA2
Use of common equipmentCo-existence
16
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1.1. Background and motivation Background and motivation
2.2. IEEE 802.3av standardizationIEEE 802.3av standardization
3.3. Research activitiesResearch activities(a)(a) Optical transceiver technologiesOptical transceiver technologies(b)(b) Asymmetric system Asymmetric system (c)(c) Symmetric systemSymmetric system
4.4. Development statusDevelopment status
5.5. SummarySummary
OutlineOutline
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Optical transceiver technologies Optical transceiver technologies
ONU TransmitterONU TransmitterONU Transmitter
OLT ReceiverOLT ReceiverOLT Receiver
The latest reported results on optical transceiver technologies are as follows:
Main performance
� 6ns turn-on/off time� +3.3dBm output power
� 0.5ns response� +4.4dBm-output power
� AC-coupled differential interface using BLW-CMR techniqueNTTOFC’08
Applied technologiesReported at / from
� Impedance-controlled DC-coupled burst-mode LD driver circuitMitsubishiOFC’08
� Quad-rate samplingMitsubishiECOC’08� 72 bit CID tolerant CDR
� Burst-mode PIN-TIA � Automatic offset compensation
(2-stage)NTTECOC’07
� 10ns instantaneous response� -19.5dBm sensitivity� 20.5dB dynamic range
� Cascade-type burst CR circuitYokogawaECOC’08� 50ps synchronization time
Main performance
� 1.25/10.3-Gbps dual-rate burst-mode receiver
� 160bit CID tolerant CDR � Single-VCO architecture NTTECOC’07Applied technologiesReported at / from
� Two gate circuits� AC-coupled interface� No reset signals
NTTECOC’08
17
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Asymmetric system Asymmetric system
� 2.5Gbps burst receiverNSNECOC’07� 10G/2.5Gbps demonstration� Downstream bit-stacking by using
electrical multiplexing Alcatel-LucentECOC’08� 10G/2.5Gbps GPON
coexistence for downstream
� DS synch-protection mapping� Electrical multiplexingFujitsuECOC’07� G-/10G-PON mixture system
� Seamless upgrade
Main performance� 10G/1G-EPON demonstration� 128-split, 10km-system ETRIIEEE802.3
CFI-’06.3
Applied technologiesReported at / from
� DS: 10Gbps, US: 1Gbps� Split : 128� Distance : 10km
CFI, March 2006, IEEE 802.3CFI, March 2006, IEEE 802.3
Feasibility test Feasibility test of 10G/1Gof 10G/1G--EPONEPON
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Symmetric system Symmetric system
� PR30 compliant burst-mode Tx/Rx� FPGA-based PON MACKDDIECOC’08� >9Gbps US throughput
� >30dB power budget (PR30)
� IEEE802.3 MPCPMitsubishiOECC’07� 9.7Gbps US throughput� 32-LLIDs
Main performance� 4Gbps US throughput� 23dB power budget w/o FEC
� XENPAK-based burst-mode Tx/Rx� FPGA-based PON MACKDDIECOC’05
Applied technologiesReported at / from
OLT
ONU
ONU
Tx(DML)
Burst control signalONU-1
10GbEMAC
(FPGA)
10GbEMAC
(FPGA)XFPXFP
10G-EPONMAC
(FPGA)
10G-EPONMAC
(FPGA)Optical
Transceiver
Tx(DML)
RxWDMWDM
10GbEMAC
(FPGA)
10GbEMAC
(FPGA)XFPXFP
10G-EPONMAC
(FPGA)
10G-EPONMAC
(FPGA)Optical
Transceiver
Tx(EML)
Rx
OLT
WDMWDM
ONU-2
10G10G--EPON prototypeEPON prototype
18
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1.1. Background and motivation Background and motivation
2.2. IEEE 802.3av standardizationIEEE 802.3av standardization
3.3. Research activitiesResearch activities
4.4. Development statusDevelopment status(a)(a) ChipsetChipset(b)(b) Key devices for 10Gbit/s burstKey devices for 10Gbit/s burst--mode transmissionmode transmission(c)(c) Equipments for asymmetric 10GEquipments for asymmetric 10G--EPON systemEPON system
5.5. SummarySummary
OutlineOutline
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
CChipsethipset
The PAS8001 and PAS9001 deliver 10Gbit/s performance, pre-standard (draft 1.1) IEEE 802.3av compliance, 1G/10G co-existence with auto-detect, standard encryption, high-performance backward-compatible Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation (DBA) and commercially viable transceivers developed by a leading transceiver vendor partner.
PMC-Sierra
EPON chip vendors start the delivery of 10GEPON chip vendors start the delivery of 10G--EPON evaluation board.EPON evaluation board.
Teknovus’ 10G EPON evaluation board system (EVB) is compliant with the latest draft of the IEEE 802.3av 10G EPON standard. In addition to the IEEE 802.3av feature set, the 10G EPON EVB system supports triple-lambda wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) downstream operation at 1.25G, 2.5G and 10G simultaneously.
Teknovus
Press Release (Mar. 31, 2008)http://investor.pmc-sierra.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74533&p=irol-newsCorporateArticle&ID=1123318&highlight=
Press Release (Nov. 18, 2008)http://www.teknovus.com/page.cfm?PageID=200&CategoryID=14
19
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Key devices for 10Gbit/s burstKey devices for 10Gbit/s burst--mode transmissionmode transmission
ONU TransmitterONU TransmitterONU Transmitter
OLT ReceiverOLT ReceiverOLT Receiver 10.3 Gbps quad-rate sampling burst-mode CDR
�XFP module size (78x18.3x8.2mm)�Output power : +7.0dBm�Extinction ratio : 7.1dB�Mask margin : 29%�Turn_on/off : 6/0 ns
�0.13�m SiGe BiCMOS�6.6x6.3mm size�1.9W power consumption
Quad-rate sampling IC
Burst response �CID : 72-bit �1st-bit burst-mode recovery
Courtesy Mitsubishi Electric CorporationCourtesy Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
Asymmetric 10GAsymmetric 10G--EPON systemEPON system
OLTOLTOLT
System featuresSystem featuresSystem features
� ATCA300 universal architecture� High-speed backplane � FPGA-based PON-MAC
Courtesy NECCourtesy NEC
� SFP-sized optical transceiver� Mesa-type APD� FPGA-based PON MAC
� Asymmetric 10G-EPON system (Downstream: 10Gbps, Upstream : 1Gbps)� Compliant with IEEE802.3av draft2.0 � Co-existence with 1G-EPON (IEEE802.3ah) � Loss budget (channel insertion loss) : > 30 dB� Maximum distance : 20km� 32 subscribers per PON interface� Superior QoS to subscribers and services
ONUONUONU
20
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
1.1. Background and motivation Background and motivation
2.2. IEEE 802.3av standardizationIEEE 802.3av standardization
3.3. Research activitiesResearch activities
4.4. Development statusDevelopment status
5.5. SummarySummary
OutlineOutline
K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo
SummarySummary
Why 10G-EPON?
�� Optical feeders with bandwidth of 10Gbps are necessary for nextOptical feeders with bandwidth of 10Gbps are necessary for next--generation generation access system, and PON topology is expected to reduce CAPEX and access system, and PON topology is expected to reduce CAPEX and OPEX. OPEX.
Standardization
�� Draft2.2 was issued after November 2008 meeting, and the standarDraft2.2 was issued after November 2008 meeting, and the standard is d is expected to be approved in September 2009. expected to be approved in September 2009.
�� IEEE802.3av mainly focuses on physical layer specifications. IEEE802.3av mainly focuses on physical layer specifications.
Research and development activities
�� Feasibility studies on key components and systems have been repoFeasibility studies on key components and systems have been reported. rted. �� EPON chip vendors and system vendors have been developing evaluaEPON chip vendors and system vendors have been developing evaluation tion
boards and protoboards and proto--type systems.type systems.
Challenges toward commercial products
�� Reduction of cost, size, and power consumption of optical transReduction of cost, size, and power consumption of optical transceiversceivers�� Interoperability on optical transceiver and MAC chipInteroperability on optical transceiver and MAC chip