Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE ATKINSONSAccording to the Internet Surname Database: “Thisfamous surname is regarded as being of Anglo-Scot-tish origins, although with Norman antecedents.Found in the spellings of Atkinson, Aitchison, Ache-son, Aicheson, and Aitcheson, it is as a patronymicform of the medieval male given name Atkin or Adkin,itself a double diminutive of the Hebrew name 'Adam',meaning 'red earth'. Adam (as a baptismal name) isfirst recorded in the English Domesday Book of 1086,suggesting that it was an introduction after the 1066Invasion. “Certainly thereafter it became steadily more popularcreating further diminutives such as Adcock and At-cock, with the same meaning. Early examples includeAdekin filius Turst (Adekin the son of Turst) in the1191 Pipe Rolls of Norfolk, and John Adekyn in the1296 Records of Crowland Abbey, Cambridgeshire.William Atkyns was recorded in the Subsidy Rolls of
Worcestershire, dated 1327, and John Atkinson waslisted in the Assessments relating to the feudal lists ofthe county of Westmorland in 1402. Further examplesare those of James Aitchesoun, master of the Scot-tish Mint in 1553, and Marc Aichesone or Acheson ofAchesounes hevin (now Morrisons Haven), in 1609.A very interesting recording is that of John Atkinson,aged 24 yrs., who embarked from London on the ship"Bonaventure", bound for Virginia, on Janaury 15th1634. He was one of the earliest settlers in the NewWorld Colonies. The coat of arms granted in 1604has the blazon of a red field, charged with a goldbend cotised, and thereon three red helmets. Thecrest is a wolf head erased. The first recorded spellingof the family name is shown to be that of John Atkyn-soun, which was dated 1387, in the "Records of NorthBerwick", Scotland, during the reign of King Robert11 of Scotland, 1371 - 1390.”
THE MEANING AND ORIGIN OF THE NAME
Cordelia Atkinson was Florence
Watson’s mother, and our great,
great grandmother.
Florence herself was born in Man-
ningham, Bradford, but her mother
gives two places of birth, West End
and Thruscross, which are two tiny
and adjacent villages in West
Yorkshire, about 12 miles west of
Harrogate.
They appear on the map above,
along with Thornthwaite and Fews-
ton, and it is from this area of villa-
ges that several generations of
Atkinson had lived before Cordelia.
For example, in 1651 “it was de-manded by ..... Grane or bedell ofthe forest or their deputies shouldsummon sixteen customary te-nants of the Lords theird of theneighboroughood of the Forest thatthey should be at this court to abutlimit and seesorts to that aforesaidJohn Reynard one sufficient andcommon way from acretoyne mossin Thruscross aforesaid unto oneacre of land and meadow in Thrus-cross aforesaid called heist andLongridge and Cothams and ac-cordingly to this court came WilliamBentley Guaine of the said forestand made his returns of the custo-mary tenants he has summoned as
by his writ he was commanded todo”.Just what all that means is hard to
work out, but one of the tenants in
questions was called Robert Atkin-
son.
A study of the various Quaker At-
kinson families of West Jersey,
USA, concludes that “John Atkin-son, founder of the line at presentunder consideration, was a Yorks-hireman who lived for many years
at Newby, but about 1659 removedto Thruscross in the same county,he was among the earliest of theconverts to the tenets of GeorgeFox in Yorkshire, and he had atleast two sons, both of whom cameto Pennsylvania (John and Tho-mas).”
One internet source claims to have
traced our Atkinson line all the way
back to Robert Atkinson (born
1689) of Yorkshire and Alice
Smurthet (born 1670) of Ripley,
who were indeed married on Ja-
nuary 14, 1709. But the information
isn’t very well substantiated, and so
I only include it here as a possibi-
lity.
The theory is that Robert and Alice
were the parents of Henry Atkin-
son who married Mary Parker
(born 1706) in Darley, Yorkshire in
1733. Henry Atkinson died in 1776.
All of these events are recorded,
and Darley is another of the villa-
ges on the map, just up the road
from Thruscross, but there doesn’t
seem to any reliable evidence to
suggest that there really was a link.
That is not to say that it isn’t quite
plausible.
It is also claimed that they had six
children:
Ann Atkinson (1736 – 1776), Ro-
bert Atkinson (1738 – 1739), a se-
cond Robert Atkinson after the first
had died (1740 – 1741), James At-
kinson (1742 – 1760), Henry At-
kinson (1744 – 1812) and Alice
Atkinson (1748 – 1749).
Again, I can only assume that there
is evidence somewhere to support
this, because I have not found it.
Typical Darley countryside
107
Henry Atkinson (1744 - 1812) and Jane Meadley (1752 – 1806)It is then claimed that Robert and Alice’s son Henry Atkinson (born in 1744 in ne-
arby Hampsthwaite) was the one that was recorded as marrying in the same vi-
llage in 1769, as testified by the local parish records: “Mar. 27 Jas. lllingworthWit. Wm. Bramley, Fran. Graham � Henry Atkinson & Jane Meadley both ofthis par. by banns April 20.” The witnesses were Robert Petty and William Petty.This seems to be the first claim in the Atkinson line that really does seem likely
to be correct.
This couple definitely had two children, recorded in the Hampsthwaite parish re-
cords, Jane Atkinson (1773), who seems to have died just one year later. Then
came Henry Atkinson (1774).
It might seem unusual that they took four years to have their first child, but the
Hampsthwaite records also state that a Henry Atkinson was also father of Mary
Atkinson (1770), Thomas Atkinson (1771 – 1832), William Atkinson (1772 – ),
Ann Atkinson (1776 – ), Robert Atkinson (1780 – ) and James Atkinson (1782 –
1853).
That would be eight children in total. However, the possibly odd thing is that
Jane and Henry are registered to Henry Atkinson Jr. and the other six to simply
Henry Atkinson. Whether that matters is unclear, but maybe the other six were
born to a different Henry Atkinson of Thornthwaite. But I think that’s unlikely.
Henry and Jane would be likely to have their first child immediately after marr-
ying, and it seems odd that they should start having children precisely when this
other Henry Atkinson took a four-year break from producing offspring.
Henry died in 1812, six years after his wife Jane.
Hampsthwaite, with the
school on the left. One of
the village’s claims to fame
is having six consecutive
consonants in its name.
Henry Atkinson (1774 - ) and Elizabeth (1752 – 1806)
UK CENSUS 1851, THORNTHWAITE
UK CENSUS 1841, THRUSCROSSIt is their son Henry who continues our story, one of the two children who weredefinitely born to Henry and Jane. This Henry apparently married to a lady ca-lled Elizabeth (born 1784 in Ripon) and is the man who appears in the 1841
census as a farmer in Thurscross.
He is there with two children, Jane (1816) and James (1828). That’s a massive
gap between children, but that’s what it says on the census. Maybe there were
other children.
They had another child before Jane, Robert Atkinson (1815), who would be
Cordelia Atkinson’s father. The reason he doesn’t appear on this census is be-
cause he was already married by this point and appears elsewhere.
The address given is a curious one – Stone House. That is the name of the
Stone House Inn, in an isolated spot, but that still exists today.
But there is no indication here of any publican working at Stone House, just the
Metcalfe’s down the road at the Gate Inn (1699-1960).
After a bit of investigation (see following page), I have discovered that some un-
founded claims have been made as to the antiquity of the Stone House Inn. No
it hasn’t been an inn for three centuries, as some have claimed. In the early
19th century it was Henry Atkinson’s farmhouse.
In 1851, Henry and Elizabeth are still around, now recorded as living just up the
road in Thornthwaite, now on their own. There seems little doubt that these
are the same people, so it is curious that Henry now gives his profession as a
‘retired shoemaker’ and not a farmer as he was before.
But his son, Robert, who lived at Stone House after Henry moved back
to his home village, was recorded as both a farmer and shoe maker,
which shows that the Atkinsons were both.
Henry Atkinson died a year after that entry was made, aged 78.
I can’t work out what became of either James or Jane, their two youn-
ger children.
There are Atkinsons called James and Jane all over the place for the
next few decades, many of which don’t give any more accurate place
of birth than ‘Yorkshire’ and there are none that are immediately ob-
vious as being either of them.
Neither can I find any further record of his wife Elizabeth, who must
have died fairly shortly after.
Henry Atkinson
1744
Jane Meadley
Jane Atkinson
1773
Henry Atkinson
1774
Elizabeth Atkinson
~1784
Robert Atkinson
~1815 - 1891
Harr iet Atkinson
~1816 - 1880
Sarah Ann Atkinson
~1837
Elizabeth Atkinson
~1839
Mary Atkinson
~1842
Henry Atkinson
~1847
James Atkinson
~1849
Cordelia Atkinson
~1849 - 1913
William Watson
1851 - 1883
Jane Atkinson
~1816
James Atkinson
~1828
108
THE STONE HOUSE INN, THRUSCROSS - THE TRUE STORY
Henry Atkinson was a farmer and cobbler who in 1841 was living at a
place called Stone House in Thruscross. In 1851, his oldest son, Ro-
bert was doing the same there, with his wife, Harriet.
Nowadays, this is the site of the Stone House Inn, which was almost
closed down in 2005. As one story explained at the time “In these daysof doom and gloom it's heartening to hear of something that's goneright for a change. “The Stone House Inn, at Thruscross, two miles upthe Pateley Bridge road from Blubberhouses, has been serving thelocal community for three centuries. It was closed three years ago bythe previous owners who claimed it was no longer viable as a pub andwas due to be turned into houses. The locals mobilised, opposing theplan and Harrogate Council finally rejected the redevelopment. TheRawson family from North Leeds bought the place and reopened it inFebruary as a non-smoking pub.”Another report of the story explains that “The Stone House Inn hasexisted as a public house for at least 300 years and is thought to havebeen an old coaching house before that. A Joe Topham is known tohave sold home-brewed ginger beer there at 2d a pint in the early 19th
century and later applied for a beer licence. In 1869 a Jesse Peel took over, ins-talled a brewing plant and also sold beer wholesale on a dray. One of his des-cendants, Edith Townson, who is 90 this year, still lives nearby.”However, it really does seem that the claim that the inn had been serving the
community for three centuries is just the kind of typical historical claim that has
no basis in fact.
Our own ancestors lived there in the early 19th century, where they were both
farmers and cobblers, but nowhere is there any indication that Stone House
served food or drink to the public, and there is no census reference to it being
an inn, coaching house or anything of the sort until the aforementioned Jesse
Peel was there in the 1871 census. And the people could smoke.
Yet another site gives a slightly different version of the history of Stone House.
This one, ‘Pubs and Inns in Nidderdale and the Washburn Valley’ says that
“The Stone House was originally an 18th century built farm until in 1868 whenJesse Peel (whose brother John ran the nearby Gate Inn) was granted a li-cence and ran the pub for forty five years.”This version of events does make sense. John Peel at the Gate Inn, which
existed until 1960, does indeed appear on the census.
On the reopening of the Stone House Inn, as the first non-smoking pub in the
Dales, Thruscross Parish Meeting chairman, retired local farmer, John Verity,
said: “There have been enough difficulties in the countryside with local ame-nities disappearing. The Stone House Inn has been a local meeting place forhundreds of years and people wanted it to remain open. We are delighted thatthis is the case.”It’s nice to see the Stone House Inn open again, but the misguided claims that
it has been serving drinks for 300 years is also wiping out the history of Henry
and Robert’s noble attempts to run a farm and cobble shoes, which is what
was really happening at Stone House in the early 19th century.
It has been an inn since about 1869. Before that, it was the Atkinsons farm. Let
it not be remembered for something it was not.
109
Robert Atkinson (1815 – 1891) and Harriet Atkinson (1816 – 1880)
UK CENSUS 1841, THRUSCROSS GREEN
UK CENSUS 1851, STONE HOUSE, THRUSCROSS
UK CENSUS 1861, EAST GATE, THRUSCROSS
UK CENSUS 1871, EAST GATE, THRUSCROSS
UK CENSUS 1881, ROTTEN ROW, THRUSCROSS
UK CENSUS 1891, ROTTEN ROW, THRUSCROSS
Pretty much all that is left of Thruscross these days -
derelict and abandoned buildings.
Robert Atkinson is a kind of missing link that tied the whole of Florence
Watson’s mother’s past together.
In 1841, he was not living with his parents, for he had already married
to a lady called Harriet, whose maiden name I have not managed to
work out. I can’t find any Harriet of any surname born, as she states, in
Thruscross. In 1841, they already had their first two children, six year old
Sarah and two-year old Elizabeth.
They are living just two homes away from Stone House, where the se-
nior Atkinsons were living, theirs being one of a number of homes listed
under Thruscross Green, a place where in 2005 “signs of possible pre-historic settlement, in the form of hut circles and carved rocks” were dis-covered.
Apparently “the name Thruscross seems to have been derived eitherfrom the Norse name of Thorin or the Anglo Scandinavian Thur or Thorand combined with cross which may relate to a boundary, landowners-hip or waymarker.”There is not much left there now, almost all of the houses are now de-
relict.
In 1851, Robert’s parents had moved back to Thornthwaite, and it is
now he himnself, Robert, who is living at Stone House.
And the entry also clears up the mystery of Robert Atkinson’s father’s
contrasting professions. Robert has obviously taken over where his re-
tired father left off, and is now a ‘farmer and shoemaker’, so they did
both. And he could even take on a local apprentice in John Moorhouse,
who was living with them.
Once again there is no reference whatsoever to Stone House being an
inn, it was merely the farm, which substantiates the idea that it didn’t
really become an inn until Jesse Peel got his licence in 1869.
Robert and Harriet have all their children with them in 1851. After two
daughters to begin with, they then had two more.
First came Mary and then Cordelia. They seem to have made a right
pig’s ear of trying to work out how to write her name, here it seems to
be Kordeliah or something like that, the first of a number of different
spellings she would have over the years. Finally, came two sons, Henry
and James.
110
Attention all, baith great an' small,
An' doan't screw up your feaces;
While I rehearse i' simple verse,
A count o' Pateley Reaces.
Fra all ower moors they com by scores
Girt skelpin' lads an' lasses;
An' cats an' dogs, an' coos an' hogs,
An' horses, mules an' asses.
Awd foaks were thar, fra near an' far,
At couldn't fairly hopple;
An' laffin' brats, as wild as cats,
Ower heeads an' heels did topple.
The Darley lads arrived i' squads,
Wi' smiles all ower their feaces;
An' Hartwith youths, wi' screwed-up mooths,
In wonder watched the reaces.
Fra Menwith Hill, and Folly Gill,
Thorngat, an' Deacon Paster,
Fra Thruscross Green, an' t' heets were seen
Croods coomin' thick an' faster.
All kinds and sorts o' games an' sports,
Had Pateley chaps provided,
An' weel did t' few their business do
At ower 'em all persided.
'T'wad tak a swell a munth to tell
All t' ins an' t' oots o' t' reaces,
Hoo far they ran, which horses wan,
An' which were back'd for pleaces.
Awd Billy Broon lost hauf a croon
Wi' Taty-Hawker backin',
For Green Crag flew, ower t' hurdles true,
An' wan t' match like a stockin'.
An' Creaven Lass won lots o' brass,
Besides delightin' t' Brockils,
An' Eva danc'd, an' rear'd and pranc'd;
An gif she stood o' cockles.
But t' donkey reace were star o' t' pleace,
For awd an' young observers;
'Twad meade a nun fra t' convent run
An' ne'er again be nervous.
Young pronsy flirts, i' drabbl'd skirts,
Like painted peeacocks stritches;
While girt chignons like milkin'-cans
On their top-garrits perches.
Lile pug-nosed Nell, fra Kettlewell,
Com in her Dolly Vardin,
All frill'd an' starch'd she proodly march'd
Wi' squintin' Joe fra Bardin.
Tha're mushroom fops, fra' fields an' shops,
Fine cigarettes were sookin',
An' lots o' youths, wi' beardless mooths,
All kinds o' pipes were smookin'.
An' when at last the sports were past,
All heamward turn'd their feaces;
To ne'er relent at e'er they spent
A day wi' Pateley Reaces.
PATELEY REACES(Anonymous traditional Yorkshire poem)
Over the next decade there was a massive exo-
dus of Atkinson children. All of the girls and James
as well were gone by the time of the 1861 census.
They had also left the Stone House and were li-
ving at a place called East Gate.
Robert no longer appears to be farming, he is just
a shoe maker, and his son Henry is working with
him. Absolutely nothing had changed when the
1871 census was conducted. Same three people,
same jobs, same house.
Harriet died in 1880, leaving Robert a 65 year old
widower, and it was probably because of that that
one of their daughters, 42 year old Elizabeth, who
still hadn’t married, moved in as their housekee-
per, while her father and brother continued making
shoes (and now boots as well).
They are now living in the delightfully named Rot-
ten Row, which may actually be the same place
they lived in before, if not it wouldn’t be very far
away.
Rotten Row still exists in some form today. A hi-
king/jogging online forum suggests the following
route “Park at Thruscross reservoir car park. Runover dam, follow road up for about 1km. Take leftgate/un-signed path, above Rotten Row houses,over rough ground, head to water tower, followpath to Padside Green.”By the time of the 1891 census, Robert was in his
mid seventies, and was no longer making shoes,
having left the business in the hands of his 44 year
old son Henry, who was still single, as was Eliza-
beth, who was now 52 and still the housekeeper.
That was Robert’s last census entry. He died in
June 1891, aged 76.
Cordelia Atkinson (1844 – 1913)
UK CENSUS 1871, 53, BOWLAND STREET, MANNINGHAM, BRADFORD
UK CENSUS 1861, VICTORIA STREET, BRADFORD
UK CENSUS 1911, 35, VICTORIA ROAD, SALTAIRE
There is very little to be said about Florence Watson’s mother that
hasn’t already been told either in this section on the Atkinsons or
in the section on her husband William Watson.
She gives three different places of birth on different censuses:
Thruscross, Fewston and West End, all of which are part of the
same general cluster of villages, but it seems that Stone House
was her childhood home.
By the time of the 1861 census, she had left her country life be-
hind her and was a live-in servant for the Read family in the West
End of Bradford. I can’t read what the head of the household, Ben-
jamin Read did, but he was employing six men and three ap-
prentices. He and his wife had four daughters aged 4, 3, 1 and a
newborn baby who didn’t appear to even have a name yet. She
was just called ‘baby’.
In 1871, Cordelia was 26 at the time of the census, and was now
living in the Manningham district of Bradford, lodging at 53, Bo-
wland Street and working as a dress maker. She was sharing the
flat with another dress maker called Frances Maria Hudd , who must have been a
friend and/or colleague.
A bit of a touchy issue this one. Cordelia and her friend may well have been making
dresses, but it is also correct to say that in 19th century censuses, ladies often used
the terms ‘dressmaker’ and ‘seamstress’ as euphemisms for a slightly less reputa-
ble trade. I’m not saying Cordelia was a prostitute, just that ... well, it’s not a possi-
bility we can completely ignore.
A year later she married, in September 1872, to William Watson, who we know was
from a family of millers, but he himself was working as a blacksmith’s assistant.
William was born in 1851, meaning Cordelia was actually seven years older than
he was.
And here something curious happens. Because in the next census, that of 1881,
Cordelia is suddenly giving her age as 32. There is no way she was 32, she would
have been about 36 or 37 at the time, in keeping with her previous census entries.
111
There is no doubt that we have the right people here.
Even though they were now living in London, Cordelia gives her correct
birthplace, as does William, and they have their two children Florence and
Hettie.
Especially with Cordelia being such an unusual name, there can be no
confusion here – it looks like Cordelia, who was seven years older than
her husband, simply lied about her age.
Whether this was to impress her husband, to impress the Watsons, or had
something to do with her ‘dressmaking’, we do not know.
It is particularly interesting that her own daughter, Florence, also seems
to have knocked a few years off her age when she got married to George
Fisk. So was Florence just putting into practice a little family trick she had
learned off her mother?
It seems that the London experience was something of a disaster all
round, and Cordelia and William were back in Yorkshire by 1883, when for
some reason, William died and left Cordelia a widow at the age of 39 with
nine year old Florence and six year old Hettie to bring up on her own.
However, the 1911 census asks additional questions, one of which is not
just how many children a person had, but also how many they had had
that had died.
And here Cordelia states that she had two living children, but also three
that had died (none of them at birth).
I have no record of who any of these were, or when they were born, or
when they died, but they must all have died very young because they
never appeared on any of her census entries.
And then in the 1891 census, now back living in Shipley, Cordelia is a
dress maker once more, her two daughters are working in the mills, and
she has returned to using her correct age once again, 46.
In 1901, Cordelia was now retired, which seems quite unusual, as she
presumably didn’t have that much money to fall back on, but perhaps her
daughters, who were both in their twenties and still living with their mum
in Shipley while working in the mills, were supporting her.
By the time of the 1911 census, both Cordelia’s daughters had married
and left home. She was now living on her own on what she describes as
‘private means’ at 35, Victoria Road, Saltaire.
Both of her daughters had manged to marry surprisingly well considering
their troubled and humble background. Hettie married Ernest Bovingdon,
and lived in Shipley, where she even had a private servant looking after
her, so she could probably manage to send some money her mother’s
way as well.
Florence, meanwhile, had married George Fisk and in 1907 they left for
China. Cordelia was about 63 when Florence set sail, and it was probably
the last time she saw her daughter.
In 1913, Cordelia died in Shipley at the age of 69.
The other children of Robert Atkinson and Harriet AtkinsonFlorence Watson’s mother Cordelia was the fourth
child and fourth daughter of Robert Atkinson and
Harriet. Two brothers came after her.
Sarah Ann Atkinson the oldest of the four girls,
born in 1837. In 1851 she was 14, and still at
school, which was quite unusual for a girl of her
age in rural Victorian Yorkshire. Not that all that
education seemed to do her much good, because
by the time of the 1861 census, she was no more
than a humble housemaid, having moved to the big
lights of Manningham, where Cordelia would also
move a few years later. She and a German cook
called Johanna Luders were serving John Koppel
and his wife Mathilde, who were from Germany but
now ‘naturalised British subjects’. John was a
worsted merchant.
Sarah was still serving in 1861, this time for the
Dale family in Claremont, Bradford. The Dales ran
what seems to have been a fairly large printing, bo-
okbinding and bookselling business. Despite ha-
ving four daughters of adult age living with them
and seemingly not working, they felt it better to em-
ploy Sarah and a cook to do all the housework.
In 1881, she had moved to Skipton, not far away
from Kildwick, where all the Watsons had come
from (William Watson would marry her sister). She
was living at Carla Beck House, and serving Her-
bert Salt, who was the son of none other than
Tutus Salt himself, the owner of Salt’s Mill.
An internet site about Saltaire says that “the life ofHerbert Salt (1840 - 1912) followed a different pathto those of his siblings. Born on the 28th birthdayof his mother Caroline, Herbert - like several of his
brothers - was educated at Mill Hill School,London. Unlike his brothers, he did not jointhe textile company of his father Titus. Ins-tead he took up farming, an occupation hepursued for many years. The early 1870sfound Herbert running a farm on the Beau-lieu estate in the New Forest. He subse-quently moved to the Yorkshire Dales,living at Carla Beck House, a mansionwhich still stands outside Carleton, nearSkipton.” Herbert Street in Saltaire isnamed after him.
Herbert moved to London shortly after that,
where he married Elizabeth Farrell, and
after having four children, his wife died,
whereupon he married his wife’s sister,
who also died shortly after.
As for his former housemaid, Sarah Ann Atkinson, I
have no idea what became of her.
Elizabeth Atkinson (1839) moved to Shipley and
also became a servant, at Shipley Hall, built by Sir
Edward Leche in the 1630, and owned at the time
by a merchant called Thomas Arton. That was where
she was registered in 1861, while in 1871, by which
time she was 30, she was still a servant and still in
Shipley, but now for a George Hargreaves at 18,
Bradford Road.
A decade later, her mother Harriet had recently died,
and still unmarried, she returned to Thruscross to
keep house for her father and younger brother
Henry. When her father Robert also died, she sta-
yed there with her brother Henry, and brother and
sister, who never appear to have married, were still
living together in their late father’s house in 1901,
both now in their sixties.
Mary (1842) I have nothing on after she was nine
years old in the 1851 census. Maybe she died
young, or maybe she married, but I have no record
of either.
After Cordelia came the first son, Henry (1847). He
never left Thruscross. He helped his father with the
farm and the shoemaking, and then carried on doing
the same after Robert retired, and also after he died.
His sister Elizabeth came home to serve the family
when their mother died, and in 1901 they were still
there, Elizabeth keeping house and her brother far-
ming and making shoes.
James (1849) was only 13 at the time of the 1851
census, but doesn’t appear with the family and there
is no further record of him, so he most probably died.
Shipley Hall, where Elizabeth Atkinson was once a servant, and now a nursing home.
Carla Beck House, where Sarah Ann Atkinson served one of Titus Salt’s sons.
112
THE SUBMERGING OF THRUSCROSS AND WEST ENDIf Cordelia Atkinson were alive today, and decided to take a visit to her
childhood home, she would have a shock.
She wouldn’t be surprised to see that Stone House was now an inn.
Jesse Peel started serving ale there way back in 1869, and Cordelia
herself probably went in there from time to time when she was visiting
her brother Henry and sister Elizabeth, who still lived in Thruscross in
the 20th century.
What would shock her, though, would be the view. She would remem-
ber looking down from the Stone House on the valley below, over the
villages of Thruscross and the church at West End. But now they are
gone, and in there place is a reservoir.
In 1960, Yorkshire Water decided to flood the valley and create Thrus-
cross Reservoir. The work was completed in 1966, and West End and
most of Thruscross disappeared underwater.
The villages had been in decline for a century, all the way back to the
Atkinsons’ times. One website explains that “in 1960, the axe whichhad been poised over the village of West End finally fell and a startwas made on the Thruscross scheme.“West End could look back on an attractive past and a small measureof former importance. In the early nineteenth century, five waterwheelshad turned in this stretch of the valley, at mills working cotton, hempand corn. “As the water rose to inundate some 142 acres, it submerged the littleGate Inn of 1699 [the one run by John Peel, brother of Jesse Peel atthe Stone House], the small village school which had begun as a dameschool and the picturesque chapel of 1688 which gained church status
Cottages in West End. These were demolished to make way for the cons-
truction of Thruscross Reservoir. When the reservoir water level falls it is
possible to see the foundations of the old buildings.
in the nineteenth century. “Prior to the flooding, the remaining housesin West End were demolished, the villagerswere rehoused and a new church was builtabove the high water mark from stones re-moved from a ruined West End mill. “A century of decline and uncertainty cameto an end in the valley, which had oncebustled to the clatter of water-powered millgear, slumbered in the silence of a chain ofartificial lakes.”“As an industrial village, West End was do-omed before the administrators of Leedscast their gaze upon it, and the decay wasapparent in 1895 when Bradley wrote thatthe day of what he now saw as a dreamyhamlet had long departed:“The mills which formerly gave it some im-portance are now at rest, haven fallen intodecay, and are gradually approaching utterruin.” “At the cost of the disruption of a few va-lley households, some fine monuments toindustrial archaeology and the beauty of aPennine valley, the citizens of the teemingconurbation to the south were able to drinkmore deeply. “The Thruscross decision may well havebeen a right one, but one wonders howmany other little valley communities maylive unwittingly in the shadow of a thirstymetropolis?”
Photo taken a year before the valley was flooded. The interior fittings of the Holy Trinity Church, the
altar, pulpit, font and stained glass windows, were removed for incorporation in a new church builds a
few hundred yards uphill. Many of the bodies in the graveyard, which would have included some At-
kinsons, were exhumed and are now in a cemetery on the Greenhow Hill Toad.
The last service was held by candlelight on Monday, October 11th.
towards the water. Cross the footbridge. West End Low Mill, shown in the picture below, was closed in 1850.Part of it still sticks out above the water (right).
113
In years of drought, such as the one in 1990 shown in the picture, Thruscross Reservoir becomes quite an attraction when the water level drops
and the remains of the sunken villages reemerge. The picture shows how the old bridge is still standing.
ROUND BY DEEP WATERWalking round Thruscross,
from the tops of pines
we heard the sighs
of drowned lives
whispering the names of lost fields.
Mary Sara 2005
114