Upload
riska-kusuma-wardhani
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
1/28
DETERMINATION AND ALLOCATION OF KEY
RISK EVENTS FOR TOLLWAY
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ININDONESIA
Djoen San Santoso
Tri Basuki Juwono
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
2/28
Introduction
Infrastructure development is important for
economic growth.
Main constraint for infrastructure
development: government budget.
Private participation in infrastructure
development.
Risk management.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
3/28
Transportation in Indonesia
Transportation infrastructure is one of the key
facilities.
Tollway construction has been intensified since
2005, including the release of Presidential
Regulations concerning the land procurement for
public interest.
Transportation = Road
Indonesia
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
4/28
Tollway in Indonesia
Risk management is not clear.
Allocations of risks are not well agreed and some
are not stipulated in the agreement.
Attractiveness for investment.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
5/28
Objectives
To determine important risk events in Indonesian
tollway.
To analyze and propose allocation of important riskevents to serve as guideline in contract agreement.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
6/28
Limitation
Only concern about 2 parties:
1. Government (public)
2. Highway and tollway companies (private)
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
7/28
Research Method
Secondary data:
1. Research papers on this topic.
2. Previous study.
3. Documents related to tollway collected from
government and tollway companies.
4. Brief discussion.
Primary data:1. Qualitative risk assessment survey.
2. Interview.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
8/28
Questionnaire Survey
Assessment of risk are based on 2 points of views:
1. Probability of occurrence
2. Degree of impact
5-point Likert scale.
Allocation of risks
Total valid respondents = 15
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
9/28
Risk Events
55 risk events are listed in the questionnaire survey.
Categorized into:
1. Politic and Regulation (11 risks)
2. Tollway company (5 risks)3. Finance and Economic (5 risks)
4. Design (6 risks)
5. Land Acquisition (4 risks)
6. Construction (8 risks)
7. Traffic (6 risks)
8. Operation and Maintenance (8 risks)
9. Force majeure (2 risks)
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
10/28
Risk Index
Risk Index (RI) indicates the significance of the risk.
RI = M(P) x M(I)
where:
M(P) = Mean of risk probability
M(I) = Mean of risk impact
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
11/28
Code Risk EventProbability Impact Risk Index
Mean Rank Mean Rank Score Rank
R1 Instability and insecurity of the
region
1.71 46 3.46 9 5.93 33
R2 Breach or cancellation of contract 1.60 48 3.73 6 5.97 32
R3 Expropriation of the project by
government
2.00 34 3.07 25 6.13 30
R4 Change in environmental policy and
regulation
2.13 30 2.87 33 6.12 31
R5 Change in policy and regulation
related to tollway
2.07 32 3.20 21 6.61 25
R6 Change in business policy and
regulation
1.80 43 3.00 28 5.40 38
R7 Delay by government in making
decision and approval
3.13 4 3.36 7 10.52 4
R8 Delay in issuing permits by
government
2.53 17 3.13 18 7.94 17
R9 Coordination problem among
government agencies related to
tollway
2.33 23 2.87 27 6.69 23
R10 Inability of government to fulfill its
responsibilities
2.60 14 3.27 13 8.49 12
R11 Problem with public acceptance 2.36 21 2.86 31 6.73 21
R12 Cash flow problems due to investor 2.79 9 3.43 5 9.55 6
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
12/28
Code Risk EventProbability Impact Risk Index
Mean Rank Mean Rank Score Rank
R13 Problem in managing income 2.15 29 3.08 19 6.64 24
R14 Agreement related problems 2.29 26 2.86 30 6.53 26
R15 Credit related problems 2.57 16 3.36 10 8.63 11
R16 Regulation related problems 2.29 27 2.71 37 6.20 29
R17 Limited financial transaction 1.86 42 2.86 34 5.31 39
R18 Exchange rate fluctuation 2.33 24 2.47 43 5.76 35
R19 Interest rate fluctuation 2.73 10 3.07 15 8.40 15
R20 Inflation 2.67 12 3.27 11 8.71 10
R21 Bankruptcy of consortium's member
or subcontractor
2.13 31 2.93 29 6.26 27
R22 Faults in tender specifications 1.60 49 2.73 36 4.37 48
R23 Lack of design innovation 1.87 38 2.40 48 4.48 47
R24 Faults in contractor's design 1.87 39 2.53 45 4.73 46
R25 Design change requested by
government
2.20 28 3.20 16 7.04 20
R26 Competition in tender 2.36 22 2.50 42 5.89 34
R27 Project feasibility 2.60 15 3.40 8 8.84 9
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
13/28
Code Risk EventProbability Impact Risk Index
Mean Rank Mean Rank Score Rank
R28 Delay in land acquisition 4.13 1 4.00 1 16.53 1
R29 Delay in payment related to land
acquisition
2.73 11 3.27 12 8.93 8
R30 Over budget in land acquisition 3.80 2 3.80 2 14.44 2
R31 Claim from community related to
land right
2.93 5 2.87 26 8.41 14
R32 Delay in construction 2.53 18 3.07 24 7.77 18
R33 Problems with subcontractors 1.87 40 2.67 40 4.98 42
R34 Over budget due to new safety
standard and environmental policy
1.93 36 2.53 47 4.90 43
R35 Cost over-run 2.87 7 3.20 14 9.17 7
R36 Lack of skilled or experienced
workers
2.07 33 2.71 38 5.61 36
R37 Problems related to construction
materials
1.87 41 2.29 49 4.27 49
R38 Severe weather causes low
productivity
2.67 3 3.17 41 8.46 13
R39 Change in construction plan due to
third party interference
1.93 37 2.53 44 4.90 44
R40 Low traffic volume 2.93 6 3.80 3 11.15 3
R41 Faults in toll system application 1.53 51 2.00 53 3.07 53
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
14/28
Code Risk EventProbability Impact Risk Index
Mean Rank Mean Rank Score Rank
R42 No increment in toll fee 2.87 8 3.60 4 10.32 5
R43 Fail in constructing the road feeders 2.67 13 3.07 17 8.18 16
R44 Change in plan of road network which
directly affecting the tollway
2.40 19 3.00 20 7.20 19
R45 Road users do not pay toll fee 1.40 55 1.67 55 2.33 55
R46 Unpredicted increment in personel
cost
2.33 25 2.67 39 6.22 28
R47 Unpredicted increment in operationalcost
2.40 20 2.80 32 6.72 22
R48 Increment of import fee 1.53 52 2.33 50 3.58 52
R49 Low traffic volume due to severe
weather
1.47 53 1.93 54 2.84 54
R50 Low achievement of tollway operator 1.73 44 2.80 35 4.85 45
R51 Technology related problems 1.67 47 2.20 52 3.67 50
R52 Environmental related problems 2.00 35 2.53 46 5.07 40
R53 Asset transfer problems 1.73 45 2.07 51 3.58 51
R54 Natural force majeure (act of God) 1.60 50 3.40 22 5.44 37
R55 Political force majeure (war, riot) 1.47 54 3.40 23 4.99 41
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
15/28
Top 10 Risk Events
Based on the value of RI, the top ten risk events are
as follows:
Code Risk EventRisk Index
Score Rank
R28 Delay in land acquisition 16.53 1
R30 Over budget in land acquisition 14.44 2
R40 Low traffic volume 11.15 3
R7 Delay by government in making decision
and approval
10.52 4
R42 No increment in toll fee 10.32 5R12 Cash flow problems due to investor 9.55 6
R35 Cost over-run 9.17 7
R29 Delay in payment related to land
acquisition
8.93 8
R27 Project feasibility 8.84 9
R20 Inflation 8.71 10
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
16/28
Allocation of Risks
Top 10 risks were allocated to:
1. Project stages
2. Suitable party (public or private or share)
Allocation based on previous study, result of
questionnaire survey and discussion with experts in
tollway.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
17/28
Risk Allocation to Project Stage
Rank Code Risk EventDevelop
ment
Pre-Construction
Construc
tionOperationDetailed
Design
Land
Acquisiti
on
1 R28 Delay in land acquisition
2 R30 Over budget in land acquisition
3 R40 Low traffic volume
4 R7 Delay in making decision and
approval by government
5 R42 No increment in toll fee
6 R12 Cash flow problems due to
investors
7 R35 Cost over-run in construction
8 R29 Delay in payment related to
land acquisition
9 R27 Project feasibility
10 R20 Inflation
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
18/28
Risk Allocation to Suitable Party
Rank Code Risk Event Government
Highway or
Tollway
Company
1 R28 Delay in land acquisition
2 R30 Over budget in land acquisition
3 R40 Low traffic volume
4 R7 Delay in making decision and
approval by government
5 R42 No increment in toll fee
6 R12 Cash flow problems due to investors 7 R35 Cost over-run in construction
8 R29 Delay in payment related to land
acquisition
9 R27 Project feasibility
10 R20 Inflation
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
19/28
Land Acquisition Risks
Risks related to land acquisition:
1. Delay in land acquisition (R28)
2. Over budget (R30)
3. Cash flow problems due to investors (R12)
4. Delay in payment (R29)
Possible reasons:
Availability of cash.
Land price is not acceptable.
Land brokers and speculators.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
20/28
Land Acquisition under Government
Rank Code Risk Event Government
Highway or
Tollway
Company
1 R28 Delay in land acquisition
2 R30 Over budget in land acquisition
3 R40 Low traffic volume
4 R7 Delay in making decision and
approval by government
5 R42 No increment in toll fee
6 R12 Cash flow problems due to investors 7 R35 Cost over-run in construction
8 R29 Delay in payment related to land
acquisition
9 R27 Project feasibility
10 R20 Inflation
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
21/28
Land Capping110%
Rank Code Risk Event Government
Highway or
Tollway
Company
1 R28 Delay in land acquisition
2 R30 Over budget in land acquisition
3 R40 Low traffic volume
4 R7 Delay in making decision and
approval by government
5 R42 No increment in toll fee
6 R12 Cash flow problems due to investors 7 R35 Cost over-run in construction
8 R29 Delay in payment related to land
acquisition
9 R27 Project feasibility
10 R20 Inflation
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
22/28
Approval and Toll Fee Increment
Delay in making decision and approval (R7) and No
increment in toll fee (R42) are under government
control Governments responsibility.
R7 is at the development stage. While R42 is at the
operation stage.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
23/28
Low Traffic Volume
Directly related to income.
Allocated to tollway company?
Investment project so risk is under investor.
Share with government?
Attract investor to financially less feasible project.
Downside risk protection. Downside risk protection with clawback clause.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
24/28
Cost Overrun and Inflation
COST
OVERRUNManagement of
project
Change
order
INFLATION
Wrong cost
estimation
Tollway companyGovernment
Delay in
approval
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
25/28
Project Feasibility
Exists in the Development and Pre-Construction
(Detailed Design) stages.
At Development stage (tender process), cost could
not be recovered if could not win the project.
At Detailed Design stage: limited information on
the Development stage (ground condition, shifting
the toll route due to problem in land acquisition).
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
26/28
Conclusions
Proper identification and allocation of risks are
important to attract investors.
Regulations on risk allocation should be clearly
stated in the agreement.
Government is expected to be more proactive in
managing land acquisition risks.
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
27/28
Acknowledgement
Toll Road Regulatory Board (Badan Pengatur Jalan
Tol)
PT. Citra Murni Semesta
Dr. Wimpy Santoso, Dr. Andreas Wibowo and Mr.
Harlan Pangihutan
7/30/2019 10 - Santoso
28/28
THE END
THANK YOU
Djoen San Santoso
Saitama University