10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    1/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 1

    Week 11

    -KANO ANALYSIS

    Total Quali ty Management

    TQM5413

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    2/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 2

    The Theory of Attractive Quality

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    3/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 3

    Understanding Quality Attributes

    Very Satisfied

    Very Dissatisfied

    Customer Satisfaction

    AchievedNot at all

    AchievedDegree of Achievement

    One Dimensional Quality

    Attractive Quality

    Must be Quality

    Reverse Quality

    Basic Needs

    Expected Needs

    Excitement Needs

    Unspoken

    Unspoken

    Spoken

    Indifferent Quality

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    4/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 4

    Attractive Quality Creation

    - Can help us to better understand customer needs.

    - Can help us to prioritize different customer needs.

    - Can help us to identify different customer segments.

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    5/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 5

    Life-Cycle of Quality Attributes

    Indifferent Quality

    Very Satisfied

    Very Dissatisfied

    Customer Satisfaction

    AchievedNot at all

    AchievedDegree of Achievement

    One Dimensional Quality

    Attractive Quality

    Must be Quality

    Reverse Quality

    1

    2 3

    4

    Excitement Needs

    Expected Needs

    Basic Needs

    Unspoken

    Spoken

    Unspoken

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    6/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 6

    A Step Model for KANO Study

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    7/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 7

    Identification of Quality Attributes

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    8/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 8

    Which Lens Provides the Best View

    Identification of Quality Attributes

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    9/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 9

    Creating the Lens of the Customer

    Identification of Quality Attributes

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    10/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 10

    How to ask a Kano Question

    Design of Kano Questionnaire

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    11/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 11

    An Example

    Design of Kano Questionnaire

    D i f K Q i i

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    12/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 12

    Design of Kano Questionnaire

    T t d E l ti f Q ti i

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    13/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 13

    Test of Questionnaire

    Test and Evaluation of Questionnaire

    C ll ti f K d t

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    14/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 14

    Administering the Questionnaire

    Collection of Kano data

    Cl ifi ti f Q lit Att ib t

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    15/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 15

    Classification of Quality Attributes

    Kano Evaluation Table

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    16/22

    A l i th K D t

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    17/22 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 17

    Analyzing the Kano Data

    I t t ti

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    18/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 18

    Interpretation

    Benefits

    I t t ti

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    19/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 19

    Interpretation

    How to use better understanding of Attributes

    Select acco rding to M>O>A>I

    If Kano Codes are Tied

    I t t ti

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    20/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 20

    Interpretation

    Better and Worse Index

    Interpretation

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    21/22

    2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 21

    Interpretation

    Better / Worse Plot

    Your Group Assignment

  • 8/13/2019 10 Lecture g Kano Analysis

    22/22

    2008 P ti H ll I S6 22

    Your Group Assignment

    Fol low th e Step Model of Kano Study , depicted on sl id e 6.

    Take any p roduc t or serv ice and cond uct Kano Analysis.

    Minimum att r ibutes sho uld be six.

    Minimum respon dents sho uld be 30.

    Each g roup n eed to inclu de fo l low ing in the assignm ent ;

    1. Ident i f icat ion of cus tom er need.

    2. Ident i f icat ion o f a prod uc t.

    3. Ident i f icat ion of qu al i ty attr ibutes by m aking the Lens o f the customer.

    4. Formulat ion of K ano Quest ion naire.

    5. Formulat ion o f Kano Evaluat ion Table for each attr ibu te.

    6. An alysis of K ano Data by art iculat ing

    - customers as most comm on, 2ndmost comm on and 3rdm ost common in each at t r ibu te

    - better/wo rse plo t.

    7. Ident i fy the customer segments now.