10-15-14 Ltr to Yoho Regarding Terry Trussell

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/21/2019 10-15-14 Ltr to Yoho Regarding Terry Trussell

    1/5

  • 7/21/2019 10-15-14 Ltr to Yoho Regarding Terry Trussell

    2/5

  • 7/21/2019 10-15-14 Ltr to Yoho Regarding Terry Trussell

    3/5

    Page 3 of 5

    Interviews by members of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), made it clear Terry was under attackbecause he did his duty as Grand Jury Foreman. The judicial system and FDLE has made a systematic effort to en-gineer a cover-up of Siegmeisterscrimes. Because the Grand Jury voted two true bills of presentment, Terry wascharged with 10 feloniesfor simulating a legal process.Terry did nothing wrong; he just did what he was duty swornto do yet conviction carries 70 years in prison The evidence clearly shows he DID NOT simulate a legal process.

    On September 2nd, Terry was arrested and jailed on a flawed affidavit. Judge Hankinson issued an order, and war-rant for the arrest of TERRY GEORGE TRUSSELL. A Void Judgment True Bill was drafted and filing was attemptedin both Dixie County Court Clerk Office as well as with the Court Clerk in Perry (seat of the Circuit Court where JudgeHankinson is assigned), Both clerks refused to file legal papers in Terrys defense. It was also discovered that theDixie County Clerk of Court, Dana Johnson, removed, altered, or had removed and altered, official paperwork thatTerry had filed previously into the public record.

    On October 9, Terry was present for his 10:00 AM arraignment at the Dixie Court House. At 9:30 A.M, a deputy sher-iff delivered a 3-page document to Terry telling him the Judge stated if Terry wanted to speak at his own arraignment,he would be required to sign the document. Terry knew if he signed this document, he was giving up his constitution-ally protected right to a trial by a jury of his peers. He declined to sign it.

    In the courtroom at 10:00 AM, Judge Hankinson asked,IsTerry George Trussell here, and if yes, please step for-ward.Terry was sitting in the courtroom. He stood up andin a clear voice and said I am here to speak on this mat-ter. The Judge responded with a question Are youTerryGeorge Trussell?Terry began to respond but the judge,speaking over Terry,once again, asked IsTerryGeorge Trussell here? Once again,Terry responded affirmatively.The Judge ignored Terrys response a second time. Finally, the Judgeasked once again. Terry responded,For therecord, I am here to speak on that matter.

    The Judge then said, Let the record show thatTerry George Trussell has not appeared.He ordered his arrest forfailure to appear while also spending his bond. Terry answeredin a very clear and loud voice, I object! I am here.The Sheriff Deputies took Terry by his arms, walked him out of the courtroom, handcuffed him, and took him to jail.

    There are 26 signed, sworn, and notarized affidavits from people who witnessed the events in JudgeHankinsonscourtroom. The audio link to this court proceeding is here.

    The Florida Grand Jury Handbook says a Grand Jury Foreman has complete immunity for his actions ex-cept in the case where he testifies as a witness for the grand jury as to a commission of a crime and thattestimony is perjured; then the juror can be prosecuted for perjury.

    Floridas Grand Jury laws contravene their federal counterparts as seen in U.S. v Williams. 504 U.S.36 (112 S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352) a seen below.

    In the Williams decision the court said

    The Grand Jurysrelationship with the judicial branch has been at arm's length. Terry knew theJudges' direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury is confined to the constitutive one ofcalling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. See United States v. Cal-andra, 414 U.S. 338, 343, 94 S.Ct. 613, 617, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974); Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 6(a).thisbeing the case, Judge Hankinson dishonored judicial canons and the court by protecting his out ofcontrol State Attorney Jeffrey Siegmeister. The Florida Supreme Court aided abetted this process

    http://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/10/9/justiceforterry-man-appears-in-court-gets-arrested-for-failure-to-appearhttp://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/10/9/justiceforterry-man-appears-in-court-gets-arrested-for-failure-to-appearhttp://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/10/9/justiceforterry-man-appears-in-court-gets-arrested-for-failure-to-appearhttp://www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/chapters/chapter30/flgrandjuryhandbook.rtfhttp://www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/chapters/chapter30/flgrandjuryhandbook.rtfhttp://www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/chapters/chapter30/flgrandjuryhandbook.rtfhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/414/338http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/414/338http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/414/338http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/414/338http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/chapters/chapter30/flgrandjuryhandbook.rtfhttp://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/10/9/justiceforterry-man-appears-in-court-gets-arrested-for-failure-to-appear
  • 7/21/2019 10-15-14 Ltr to Yoho Regarding Terry Trussell

    4/5

    Page 4 of 5

    when Justice Labarga stuck his two cents into a situation that was already handled by GovernorScott.

    Terry also knew the grand jury's functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both inthe scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is

    exercised. "Unlike a court, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, thegrand jury 'can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because itwants assurance that it is not.' " United States v. R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. ----, ----, 111 S.Ct. 722,726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991) (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 642-643, 70S.Ct. 357, 364, 94 L.Ed. 401 (1950)). It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even "the pre-cise nature of the offense" it is investigating. Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273, 282, 39 S.Ct.468, 471, 63 L.Ed. 979 (1919). The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting courtto initiate an investigation, see Hale, supra, 201 U.S., at 59-60, 65, 26 S.Ct., at 373, 375, nor doesthe prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment.

    Terry knew thegrand jury has wide latitude to investigate violations of law as it deems ap-

    propriate and need not obtain permission from either the court or the prosecutor . See, e.g.,id., at 343, 94 S.Ct., at 617; Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 362, 76 S.Ct. 406, 408, 100L.Ed. 397 (1956); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 65, 26 S.Ct. 370, 375, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906). Corre-spondingly, we have acknowledged that "its operation generally is unrestrained by the technicalprocedural and evidentiary rules governingthe conduct of criminal trials.

    Terrys incarceration is not the result of a true bill from a grand jury required by the Fifth Amendment: When juxtaposed to 905.19 above, it is obvious Terry is a political prisoner; he violated no law. JudgeHankinsons actions were arbitrary, capricious; and unlawful if the Fifth Amendment means anything

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, un less on a

    presentment or i ndi ctment of a Grand Ju ry , except in cases arising in the land or navalforces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shallany person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; norshall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprivedof life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be tak-en for public use, without just compensation

    Furthermore, when looked at objectively one realizes part of the problem lays with the profession it-self and Congresses refusal to enforce in Article 1, Section 9, clause which reads

    ;No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office ofProfit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present,Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State. \

    The wordesquire is a title of nobility that comes from the .BAR, which defined means British AccreditationRegistry, a foreign entity that we fought a revolutionary war over and the constitution prohibits. A circuitcourt in Clark County, Nevada dealt with the issue of the missing 13th Amendment proving the amendmentexisted but was never repealed. Tolerance and preplanned public ignorance via public education allows

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/632http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/632http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/632http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/632http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/273http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/273http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/273http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/273http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/0http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/0http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/0http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/350/359http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/350/359http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/350/359http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/350/359http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/43http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/43http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/43http://www.factbites.com/topics/British-Accreditation-Registryhttp://www.factbites.com/topics/British-Accreditation-Registryhttp://www.factbites.com/topics/British-Accreditation-Registryhttp://www.factbites.com/topics/British-Accreditation-Registryhttp://constitutionalconcepts.org/13thamend-%20images.htmhttp://constitutionalconcepts.org/13thamend-%20images.htmhttp://constitutionalconcepts.org/13thamend-%20images.htmhttp://constitutionalconcepts.org/13thamend-%20images.htmhttp://www.factbites.com/topics/British-Accreditation-Registryhttp://www.factbites.com/topics/British-Accreditation-Registryhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/43http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/350/359http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/350/359http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/201/0http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/273http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/250/273http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/632http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/338/632
  • 7/21/2019 10-15-14 Ltr to Yoho Regarding Terry Trussell

    5/5

    Page 5 of 5

    this class to rule, pillage, and destroy this constitutional republic. The record shows the American Bar andmany of its members are guilty of misprision of treason;; they are vigorously aiding and abetting the imple-mentation of Agenda 21, the UN program which you told me wasthe raison dtre makingyou decide torun for office.

    I am a retired Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam Veteran. I am also a retired Public defender criminal inves-tigator. I upheld my constitutional oath life long, including the 20 years I worked in the criminal injustice sys-tem I use this term because the statutory legal system is a meat market having nothing to do with liberty or justice. Common law requires a victim2 statutory, commercial and admiralty courts do not. Numbers andgroupthink have nothing to do withjustice. Letsmake a deal is the name of the game.

    I understand you and Jeffrey Siegmeister are buds.I hope that a political relationship that takes abackseat to justice and the Constitution. I trust you will set aside your friendship with a criminal to assist an American who he falsely accused and incarcerated.

    Generations of Americans have fought and died for this country. They served something greater than

    themselves, an experience few politicians know anything about. Terry is one of those Americans. You areon record stating,While serving our nation, veterans were held accountable. They deserve no less fromtheir government It is time for your actions speak louder than words.

    Looking forward to your reply, I remain

    Yours in the bill of Rights,

    Roy G. CallahanCuban Missile Crisis/Vietnam Veteran

    Retired Investigator, Public Defenders Office, 8th

    Judicial Circuit

    2 The state cannot be the victim

    http://www.americanbar.org/groups/leadership/office_of_the_president/sustainable_development_task_force/about_us.htmlhttp://www.americanbar.org/groups/leadership/office_of_the_president/sustainable_development_task_force/about_us.htmlhttp://www.americanbar.org/groups/leadership/office_of_the_president/sustainable_development_task_force/about_us.htmlhttp://www.americanbar.org/groups/leadership/office_of_the_president/sustainable_development_task_force/about_us.html