1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    1/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    1a. Decision Making

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    2/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    WHYdo we need a course onDecision Making ???

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    3/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    AWHOLESALER enters a new country and is interestedto sell his products in 4 REGIONS

    There are 4 available WAREHOUSES, but he needs toselect only 2 (out of 4) to work with

    Annual costs of each W serving each R:

    Problem:Problem: How to choose the best 2 Ws among the 4 ?How to choose the best 2 Ws among the 4 ?

    WAREHOUSES

    REGIONS A B C D

    R1 110 640 690 450

    R2 585 65 590 115

    R3 165 200 125 840

    R4 595 580 115 100

    Case 1: Distributors Selection

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    4/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    ACommon SenseApproachStep 1:Assume all warehouses open

    The assignment is obvious:

    Assign each Region to the Warehouse with the minimum cost!

    WAREHOUSES

    REGIONS A B C D

    R1 110 640 690 450

    R2 585 65 590 115

    R3 165 200 125 840

    R4 595 580 115 100

    Total Cost = 110 + 65 + 125 + 100 = 400

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    5/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    If we were to close 1 W, close the ONE that wouldcreate the least additional cost

    A cost increase = [450 - 110] = 340

    B cost increase = [115 - 65] = 50

    C cost increase = [165 - 125] = 40D cost increase = [115 - 100] = 15 !

    Close D & assign R4 to C !

    WAREHOUSES

    REGIONS A B C D

    R1 110 640 690 450

    R2 585 65 590 115

    R3 165 200 125 840

    R4 595 580 115 100

    W A R E H O U S E S

    R E G I O N S A B C

    R 1 1 1 0 6 4 0 6 9 0

    R 2 5 8 5 6 5 5 9 0

    R 3 1 6 5 2 0 0 1 2 5

    R 4 5 9 5 5 8 0 1 1 5

    NewAssignment

    Step 2:Close a Warehouse

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    6/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Step 3:Close a 2nd Warehouse

    Since we have to close one more W, proceed similarly:

    Among the remaining Ws (A, B, C) eliminate one:

    A CostIncrease = [640 - 110] = 530

    B CostIncrease = [585 - 65] = 520C CostIncrease = [165 - 120] + [580 - 115] = 505 !

    close C !

    WAREHOUSES

    REGIONS A B C

    R1 110 640 690

    R2 585 65 590

    R3 165 200 125

    R4 595 580 115

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    7/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    WAREHOUSES

    REGIONS A B

    R1 110 640

    R2 585 65

    R3 165 200

    R4 595 580

    FinalAssignment

    Total Cost:

    110 + 65 + 165 + 580 = 920

    Is this the best? NO!

    The best would be to keepA and D, to serveregions R1/R3 and R2/R4 respectively

    Total cost = 490 (less than half!)

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    8/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Unit transportation costs along each path Given demands at each outlet, & capacity constraint ofP2

    Could include unit production and storage costs, etc

    Case 2:Supply Chain Optimization

    PLANTS WAREHOUSES DEMAND OUTLETS

    P1

    P2

    W1

    W2

    D1

    D2

    D3

    0

    5

    4

    2

    3

    45

    21

    260.000

    50.000

    100.000

    50.000

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    9/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Question

    Who produces what?

    Where is it shipped?

    What do the warehouses receive?

    From whom?

    What do the outlets receive?

    From whom?

    When?

    Design the optimal Supply Chainto min total annual cost !

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    10/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Step 1: Find the W/H to best serve each DStep 1: Find the W/H to best serve each D

    (select least cost path for each D)

    Outlet D1 is best served by Warehouse W2 Outlet D2 is best served by Warehouse W2 Outlet D3 is best served by Warehouse W2

    Common Sense Method:Step 1

    3

    4

    5

    2

    1

    2

    W1

    D1

    W2

    D2

    D3

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    11/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Step 2:Step 2: Compute demands created at each W/HCompute demands created at each W/H

    Outflows (units): Cost ()

    50,000 units from W2 p D1 100,000

    100,000 units from W2 p D2 100,00050,000 units from W2 p D3 100,000

    200,000 300,000

    Common Sense Method:Step 2

    Total transport cost for 2nd half of the chain= 300,000

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    12/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Step 3: Determine inflows (200 units to W2) with minDetermine inflows (200 units to W2) with mincost (remember capacity constraint)cost (remember capacity constraint)

    Inflows (units): Cost ()

    60,000 units from P2 p W2: 120,000

    140,000 units from P1 p W2: 700,000820,000

    Common Sense Method:Step 3

    TOTALAnnual Cost: 300,000 + 820,000 = 1,150,000 !

    W1

    W2

    P1

    P22

    5

    60.000

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    13/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Every demand location is assigned to the warehouse onits least-cost path.

    Every warehouse uses its least cost plant (up to the full

    available capacity).

    Is this the bestsolution?

    NOOOOO !

    BEST = 740,000 !!!

    Looks like a satisfactory solution

    Remember: YOU might have to use this method !!!

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    14/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    What if we had a larger scale problem?

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    15/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    ASupply Chain in India

    Srinagar Punjab U. Pradhesh Nepal

    Rajastan

    Bhopal Hyderabad Patna Gujarat Kerala

    Imagine having a similar, but slightly more complexproblem. Your company operates a supply chain thatincludes 5 suppliers of raw materials, 5 manufacturingplants, and 5 cities where your products are sold.

    Suppliers

    Delhi Mumbai Calcutta Chennai Bangalore

    Factories Stores

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    16/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Suppliers

    Factories

    Stores

    ASupplyChain in India

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    17/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Similar problem in Europe

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    18/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    ASupply Chain in Spain

    Bilbao Oviedo Pamplona Cordoba

    Zamora

    ACorunia Zaragoza Salamanca Albacete

    Imagine having a similar, but slightly more complexproblem, working for a company in Spain, with 5Suppliers, 4 factories, and 4 cities to sell:

    Suppliers

    Madrid Barcelona Seville

    Valencia

    Factories Stores

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    19/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    What if we had a larger scale problem?

    Suppliers

    Factories

    Stores

    -Where do we get ourraw materials from?-Who supplies whom?-Where is it shipped?-What does eachplant produce?-Where is the productshipped?-From where doeseach store receive?-What?-When?

    Imagine solving the ZARA problem!

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    20/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    A simple problem for a VendingOperator

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    21/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    22/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Case 3:Introducing new technology

    The Board of Trustees of an established Universitypropose to introduce computerized and web-basedprocesses for students to register in the Universityand at the courses they wish to take

    This will significantly reduce the work conducted byadministrative personnel, will reduce costs andincrease response and accuracy, and will improvethe level of services offered by the University

    However, this initiative presupposes a number ofactions that need to be taken and successfullycompleted

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    23/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    What needs to be done

    Install a process whereby students will be safely andconfidentially informed of the new process, their passwords,etc

    Re-arrange and streamline the curricula of the departments,homogenize the course offerings, course code numbers, etc

    Check and possibly revise some inconsistent rules that havebeen developed over time concerning curriculum, etc, so thatthe rules in the new system are robust and do not lead toinconsistencies

    Establish monitoring mechanisms to follow up on progress andcatch early mistakes in the design or the implementation

    Select a technology to use that will be around for a long timeand will optimize your investment Convince the people in the admin (registrars offices,IT staff)

    to follow you, and surpass themselves to achieve the above

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    24/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    What are the risks involved

    The users passwords etc are leaked and the system is attackedby hackers on the critical D-Monday all your registrars filesare useless

    The employees of the admin do not like to do more work thatis required to streamline curricula, homogenize courses etc;they have a public employee attitude

    They are also afraid that will technology they might getredundant after a few years, and, anyway, their power inmanaging a system which currently depends on them willgradually be dissolved

    The rules that need to be revised are very old and quite

    complex; new ones are too difficult to come up with Not sure of which technology to use: should we go with

    Microsoft, with best of breed, or with open code solutions?Should we buy contract service right from the beginning, orpay according to need? Will the technology align itself withpreviously existing technology and systems?

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    25/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    So, what happens?

    Nothing!

    The decision maker procrastinates and postpones thedecision

    The risks involved are many He prefers the Status Quo

    Check the book Decision traps

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    26/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Decision Making today

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    27/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    The MEGATRENDS of our times

    NetworkEconomy

    Penetration of ICT

    Technologies

    CustomerFocus

    CHANGES Permanent crises?

    Mergers &Acquisitions

    Increase of the

    Competition

    Globalisationand Deregulation

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    28/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    What is the impact to management?

    There is a needfor taking FAST

    decisions!

    Need to takeyour data in

    account !

    Time isshrinking!

    We arecontinuously pressed

    fortime!

    We areoverflowed with

    data(internal, external,

    official,unofficial,)

    AndweCANNOTignore

    them

    There isa lot

    ofUNCERTAINTY!

    Complicatedstructures

    complicate thedecisionmakingprocess

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    29/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Factors affecting the Decision Making Process TODAY

    What is the impact to Decision Making?

    Factors Trend Result

    Rate of change in the

    Business EnvironmentIncreasing

    Need for faster and more effective

    decisions

    Globalization andCompetition

    Increasing Bigger Uncertainty, Competition Intensity,Need for constant market surveillance

    Customer Orientation

    and FocusIncreasing

    Bigger Uncertainty, Smaller Lifecycles of

    products, More frequent decisions

    Size and Complexity of

    OrganizationsIncreasing

    Complexity of decisions, Greater

    consequences

    Technology (IT &

    Telecommunications)Increasing

    More decision choices, Possibility of

    diagnosing problems and opportunities

    Flat Organizational

    StructuresIncreasing

    Increasing number of decisions for

    employees, increased complexity

    Employee

    EmpowermentIncreasing

    Increasing number of decisions and of

    complexity, need for DSS

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    30/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    31/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    32/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Cri i l F rs Key Performance Indicators

    Production Cost Production Cycle time

    own Time Time-to-Market Cost per transaction Process length, cost, etc Participation in R&D Programs % of sales from new products Proposals for changes Customer Com laints Re eat sales Results of Up- and X-selling

    Production Efficiency Measures

    Operations Efficiency Measures

    Innovation Measures

    Customer Satisfaction Measures

    Examples of CSFs and KPIs (2)

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    33/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Balanced Scorecard

    Financial

    The BSC provides aframework to

    translate strategy intooperational terms

    Internal

    Business

    Process

    Customer

    Vision

    &

    Strategy

    Competence,Innovationand

    Learning

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    34/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    1b.Introduction toManagementScience

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    35/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    36/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    37/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Examples of business questions

    How should the fleet of delivery trucks beallocated to meet customer needs while makingthe best use of drivers?

    What's the best breakdown of the marketingbudget to maximize customer-response rates?

    Where should warehouses be located to minimize

    transportation costs?

    What's the impact of faster machinery on thefactory-production process?

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    38/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Other areas

    Production Planning

    ProductSelection

    Product MixProduction Planning & SchedulingManpower Planning

    Maintenance Planning

    Marketing

    Financial Planning

    Capital BudgetingInvestmentAppraisalFinancial PlanningCash flow Planning

    Media Mix

    Distribution PlanningProductIntroductionSales ManagementLocation Selection

    Transportation & NetworkFlow Problems

    Energy PlanningStrategic Planning, etc ...

    Very Large Range ofApplicationAreas

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    39/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Model - Based Approach What is a model?

    Each model has a technique associated

    with it! Methodology Based Approach

    Gives confidence about the results

    Characteristics of all big consultants

    BOTHARE VERY IMPORTANT TODAY !

    Key Characteristics of MS/OR

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    40/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Mathematical Programming (Linear,Integer, ...)

    DecisionAnalysis

    Multi-criteria Decision Making Inventory Management

    Queuing Theory

    Simulation

    Major MS/OR models

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    41/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Company with steady rate of demand d = 100 tons/month

    Purchase price E = 250 /ton

    Delivery costs k = 50 (each time)

    Storage (+ insurance, ...) costs F = 4 /ton/month

    t

    What is wrong with this management ?

    InventoryLevel

    Time

    Example 1:Inventory Management

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    42/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Irrational Ordering (time, quantity) ... why?

    Safety stock ... why?

    Q

    T 2T

    t

    What is wrong with this management ?

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    43/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    44/46

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    45/46

    G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009

    Demand for the product (if initially High)could drop to Low, with probability 15%due to a number of reasons Competitors enter the market

    The product goes out of fashion

    The technology becomes outdated

    After the initial 2 years

  • 8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09

    46/46

    jAnticipatedAnnual Revenues (in NPV)

    DURING THE FIRST 2YEARS:

    AFTERWARDS:

    INITIAL 2 YRS HIGH LOW

    BIG 300K 50K

    SMALL 100K 75K

    AFTERWARDS HIGH LOW

    BIG 300K 50K

    EXPANSION 200K 35K

    SMALL 60K 75K