Upload
agrawalsumeet
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
1/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
1a. Decision Making
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
2/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
WHYdo we need a course onDecision Making ???
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
3/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
AWHOLESALER enters a new country and is interestedto sell his products in 4 REGIONS
There are 4 available WAREHOUSES, but he needs toselect only 2 (out of 4) to work with
Annual costs of each W serving each R:
Problem:Problem: How to choose the best 2 Ws among the 4 ?How to choose the best 2 Ws among the 4 ?
WAREHOUSES
REGIONS A B C D
R1 110 640 690 450
R2 585 65 590 115
R3 165 200 125 840
R4 595 580 115 100
Case 1: Distributors Selection
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
4/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
ACommon SenseApproachStep 1:Assume all warehouses open
The assignment is obvious:
Assign each Region to the Warehouse with the minimum cost!
WAREHOUSES
REGIONS A B C D
R1 110 640 690 450
R2 585 65 590 115
R3 165 200 125 840
R4 595 580 115 100
Total Cost = 110 + 65 + 125 + 100 = 400
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
5/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
If we were to close 1 W, close the ONE that wouldcreate the least additional cost
A cost increase = [450 - 110] = 340
B cost increase = [115 - 65] = 50
C cost increase = [165 - 125] = 40D cost increase = [115 - 100] = 15 !
Close D & assign R4 to C !
WAREHOUSES
REGIONS A B C D
R1 110 640 690 450
R2 585 65 590 115
R3 165 200 125 840
R4 595 580 115 100
W A R E H O U S E S
R E G I O N S A B C
R 1 1 1 0 6 4 0 6 9 0
R 2 5 8 5 6 5 5 9 0
R 3 1 6 5 2 0 0 1 2 5
R 4 5 9 5 5 8 0 1 1 5
NewAssignment
Step 2:Close a Warehouse
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
6/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Step 3:Close a 2nd Warehouse
Since we have to close one more W, proceed similarly:
Among the remaining Ws (A, B, C) eliminate one:
A CostIncrease = [640 - 110] = 530
B CostIncrease = [585 - 65] = 520C CostIncrease = [165 - 120] + [580 - 115] = 505 !
close C !
WAREHOUSES
REGIONS A B C
R1 110 640 690
R2 585 65 590
R3 165 200 125
R4 595 580 115
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
7/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
WAREHOUSES
REGIONS A B
R1 110 640
R2 585 65
R3 165 200
R4 595 580
FinalAssignment
Total Cost:
110 + 65 + 165 + 580 = 920
Is this the best? NO!
The best would be to keepA and D, to serveregions R1/R3 and R2/R4 respectively
Total cost = 490 (less than half!)
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
8/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Unit transportation costs along each path Given demands at each outlet, & capacity constraint ofP2
Could include unit production and storage costs, etc
Case 2:Supply Chain Optimization
PLANTS WAREHOUSES DEMAND OUTLETS
P1
P2
W1
W2
D1
D2
D3
0
5
4
2
3
45
21
260.000
50.000
100.000
50.000
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
9/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Question
Who produces what?
Where is it shipped?
What do the warehouses receive?
From whom?
What do the outlets receive?
From whom?
When?
Design the optimal Supply Chainto min total annual cost !
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
10/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Step 1: Find the W/H to best serve each DStep 1: Find the W/H to best serve each D
(select least cost path for each D)
Outlet D1 is best served by Warehouse W2 Outlet D2 is best served by Warehouse W2 Outlet D3 is best served by Warehouse W2
Common Sense Method:Step 1
3
4
5
2
1
2
W1
D1
W2
D2
D3
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
11/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Step 2:Step 2: Compute demands created at each W/HCompute demands created at each W/H
Outflows (units): Cost ()
50,000 units from W2 p D1 100,000
100,000 units from W2 p D2 100,00050,000 units from W2 p D3 100,000
200,000 300,000
Common Sense Method:Step 2
Total transport cost for 2nd half of the chain= 300,000
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
12/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Step 3: Determine inflows (200 units to W2) with minDetermine inflows (200 units to W2) with mincost (remember capacity constraint)cost (remember capacity constraint)
Inflows (units): Cost ()
60,000 units from P2 p W2: 120,000
140,000 units from P1 p W2: 700,000820,000
Common Sense Method:Step 3
TOTALAnnual Cost: 300,000 + 820,000 = 1,150,000 !
W1
W2
P1
P22
5
60.000
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
13/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Every demand location is assigned to the warehouse onits least-cost path.
Every warehouse uses its least cost plant (up to the full
available capacity).
Is this the bestsolution?
NOOOOO !
BEST = 740,000 !!!
Looks like a satisfactory solution
Remember: YOU might have to use this method !!!
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
14/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
What if we had a larger scale problem?
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
15/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
ASupply Chain in India
Srinagar Punjab U. Pradhesh Nepal
Rajastan
Bhopal Hyderabad Patna Gujarat Kerala
Imagine having a similar, but slightly more complexproblem. Your company operates a supply chain thatincludes 5 suppliers of raw materials, 5 manufacturingplants, and 5 cities where your products are sold.
Suppliers
Delhi Mumbai Calcutta Chennai Bangalore
Factories Stores
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
16/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Suppliers
Factories
Stores
ASupplyChain in India
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
17/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Similar problem in Europe
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
18/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
ASupply Chain in Spain
Bilbao Oviedo Pamplona Cordoba
Zamora
ACorunia Zaragoza Salamanca Albacete
Imagine having a similar, but slightly more complexproblem, working for a company in Spain, with 5Suppliers, 4 factories, and 4 cities to sell:
Suppliers
Madrid Barcelona Seville
Valencia
Factories Stores
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
19/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
What if we had a larger scale problem?
Suppliers
Factories
Stores
-Where do we get ourraw materials from?-Who supplies whom?-Where is it shipped?-What does eachplant produce?-Where is the productshipped?-From where doeseach store receive?-What?-When?
Imagine solving the ZARA problem!
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
20/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
A simple problem for a VendingOperator
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
21/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
22/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Case 3:Introducing new technology
The Board of Trustees of an established Universitypropose to introduce computerized and web-basedprocesses for students to register in the Universityand at the courses they wish to take
This will significantly reduce the work conducted byadministrative personnel, will reduce costs andincrease response and accuracy, and will improvethe level of services offered by the University
However, this initiative presupposes a number ofactions that need to be taken and successfullycompleted
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
23/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
What needs to be done
Install a process whereby students will be safely andconfidentially informed of the new process, their passwords,etc
Re-arrange and streamline the curricula of the departments,homogenize the course offerings, course code numbers, etc
Check and possibly revise some inconsistent rules that havebeen developed over time concerning curriculum, etc, so thatthe rules in the new system are robust and do not lead toinconsistencies
Establish monitoring mechanisms to follow up on progress andcatch early mistakes in the design or the implementation
Select a technology to use that will be around for a long timeand will optimize your investment Convince the people in the admin (registrars offices,IT staff)
to follow you, and surpass themselves to achieve the above
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
24/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
What are the risks involved
The users passwords etc are leaked and the system is attackedby hackers on the critical D-Monday all your registrars filesare useless
The employees of the admin do not like to do more work thatis required to streamline curricula, homogenize courses etc;they have a public employee attitude
They are also afraid that will technology they might getredundant after a few years, and, anyway, their power inmanaging a system which currently depends on them willgradually be dissolved
The rules that need to be revised are very old and quite
complex; new ones are too difficult to come up with Not sure of which technology to use: should we go with
Microsoft, with best of breed, or with open code solutions?Should we buy contract service right from the beginning, orpay according to need? Will the technology align itself withpreviously existing technology and systems?
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
25/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
So, what happens?
Nothing!
The decision maker procrastinates and postpones thedecision
The risks involved are many He prefers the Status Quo
Check the book Decision traps
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
26/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Decision Making today
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
27/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
The MEGATRENDS of our times
NetworkEconomy
Penetration of ICT
Technologies
CustomerFocus
CHANGES Permanent crises?
Mergers &Acquisitions
Increase of the
Competition
Globalisationand Deregulation
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
28/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
What is the impact to management?
There is a needfor taking FAST
decisions!
Need to takeyour data in
account !
Time isshrinking!
We arecontinuously pressed
fortime!
We areoverflowed with
data(internal, external,
official,unofficial,)
AndweCANNOTignore
them
There isa lot
ofUNCERTAINTY!
Complicatedstructures
complicate thedecisionmakingprocess
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
29/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Factors affecting the Decision Making Process TODAY
What is the impact to Decision Making?
Factors Trend Result
Rate of change in the
Business EnvironmentIncreasing
Need for faster and more effective
decisions
Globalization andCompetition
Increasing Bigger Uncertainty, Competition Intensity,Need for constant market surveillance
Customer Orientation
and FocusIncreasing
Bigger Uncertainty, Smaller Lifecycles of
products, More frequent decisions
Size and Complexity of
OrganizationsIncreasing
Complexity of decisions, Greater
consequences
Technology (IT &
Telecommunications)Increasing
More decision choices, Possibility of
diagnosing problems and opportunities
Flat Organizational
StructuresIncreasing
Increasing number of decisions for
employees, increased complexity
Employee
EmpowermentIncreasing
Increasing number of decisions and of
complexity, need for DSS
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
30/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
31/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
32/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Cri i l F rs Key Performance Indicators
Production Cost Production Cycle time
own Time Time-to-Market Cost per transaction Process length, cost, etc Participation in R&D Programs % of sales from new products Proposals for changes Customer Com laints Re eat sales Results of Up- and X-selling
Production Efficiency Measures
Operations Efficiency Measures
Innovation Measures
Customer Satisfaction Measures
Examples of CSFs and KPIs (2)
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
33/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Balanced Scorecard
Financial
The BSC provides aframework to
translate strategy intooperational terms
Internal
Business
Process
Customer
Vision
&
Strategy
Competence,Innovationand
Learning
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
34/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
1b.Introduction toManagementScience
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
35/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
36/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
37/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Examples of business questions
How should the fleet of delivery trucks beallocated to meet customer needs while makingthe best use of drivers?
What's the best breakdown of the marketingbudget to maximize customer-response rates?
Where should warehouses be located to minimize
transportation costs?
What's the impact of faster machinery on thefactory-production process?
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
38/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Other areas
Production Planning
ProductSelection
Product MixProduction Planning & SchedulingManpower Planning
Maintenance Planning
Marketing
Financial Planning
Capital BudgetingInvestmentAppraisalFinancial PlanningCash flow Planning
Media Mix
Distribution PlanningProductIntroductionSales ManagementLocation Selection
Transportation & NetworkFlow Problems
Energy PlanningStrategic Planning, etc ...
Very Large Range ofApplicationAreas
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
39/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Model - Based Approach What is a model?
Each model has a technique associated
with it! Methodology Based Approach
Gives confidence about the results
Characteristics of all big consultants
BOTHARE VERY IMPORTANT TODAY !
Key Characteristics of MS/OR
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
40/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Mathematical Programming (Linear,Integer, ...)
DecisionAnalysis
Multi-criteria Decision Making Inventory Management
Queuing Theory
Simulation
Major MS/OR models
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
41/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Company with steady rate of demand d = 100 tons/month
Purchase price E = 250 /ton
Delivery costs k = 50 (each time)
Storage (+ insurance, ...) costs F = 4 /ton/month
t
What is wrong with this management ?
InventoryLevel
Time
Example 1:Inventory Management
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
42/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Irrational Ordering (time, quantity) ... why?
Safety stock ... why?
Q
T 2T
t
What is wrong with this management ?
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
43/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
44/46
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
45/46
G. P. Prastacos, Decision Making, AUEB, 2009
Demand for the product (if initially High)could drop to Low, with probability 15%due to a number of reasons Competitors enter the market
The product goes out of fashion
The technology becomes outdated
After the initial 2 years
8/9/2019 1 - Why DM - Models 11.09
46/46
jAnticipatedAnnual Revenues (in NPV)
DURING THE FIRST 2YEARS:
AFTERWARDS:
INITIAL 2 YRS HIGH LOW
BIG 300K 50K
SMALL 100K 75K
AFTERWARDS HIGH LOW
BIG 300K 50K
EXPANSION 200K 35K
SMALL 60K 75K