Upload
gertrude-coleen-maxwell
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Vehicle-to-Vehicle Wireless Communication Protocol for
Collision Warning
Arunkumar AnandNo 2, S7 ECE
http://arunkumaranand.bizhat.com/seminar
Seminar Presentation 2006Dept. of Electronics & Communiactions.
Govt. Engg. College, Wayanad.
28th September 2006
2
Contents
• Motivation• Application Levels• Overview of Vehicular Communications• Needs and Assumptions• Protocol for Vehicular Comm.• Application Challenges• State Transition• Future Works• Conclusion
References
3
Motivation
Study shows - “About 60% roadway collisions could be avoided if the operator of the vehicle was provided warning at least one-half second prior to a collision” (- US. Patent No. 5,613,039)
Constraints of human drivers’ perceptionLine-of-sight limitation of brake lightLarge processing/forwarding delay for emergency events.
Accidents have been taking thousands of lives each year
4
1. Line of Sight Limitation
What’s in front of What’s in front of that bus ?that bus ?
What’s behind What’s behind the bend ?the bend ?
On rainy daysOn rainy days
On foggy daysOn foggy days
Constraints of human drivers’ perception
Fig.1
5
2. Large forwarding delay for emergency events.
Constraints of human drivers’ perception
Three Cars, namely
Car A
Car B
Car C
Reaction time ranges from 0.7sec to 1.5sec
Animation. 1
6
Data Base
Traffic Management Center(TMC)
CommunicationHot Spots (DSRC)
Satellite toVehicle(GPS)
Vehicle-to-
Vehicle
( DSRC)
Vehicle -
to-
Roadside(DSRC)
Overview of Different Vehicular Communications
Petrol Pump, Workshop etc..
( V2V )
( V2R )
Scope of this Paper
Fig.2
7
Application Levels
Traffic Safety can be improved if drivers have the ability to see further down the road.
If traffic information was provided to Drivers, Police and other Authorities; roads would be safe and traveling on them would be more efficient
Vehicle-to-Vehicle(V2V) and Vehicle-to-Roadside(V2R) Communication can bring out the following achievements.
Presence of obstacles on road. Emergency Braking of a preceding vehicle. Information about Blind Crossing, School proximity, Railway crossing etc… Entries to Highways. High Speed Internet Access. Electronic Toll Collection. Parking Space locater in Cities. Nearest Petrol Pump, Workshop etc..
8
for a vehicle participating in V2V communication
Is able to obtain its own geographical location and determine the relative positions on the road.(Digital Maps, GPS)
Is equipped with at least one wireless transceiver
Needs and Assumptions
Interested on Direction, Speed, Position etc…
9
Protocol for Vehicular Comm.
Unreliable wireless link Congested channel Versatile topology due to high mobility of vehicles Low Latency Dynamically form wireless loops
Challenges and Requirements
Technology for ITS especially for v2v and v2r communicationService rules for DSRC are developed by the ASTM DSRC is based on IEEE 802.11a technology
10mMin. Separation
1000mMax Range
1-54MbpsData Rate
7 channelsChannels
QPSK OFDMModulation
75MHz (5.850 – 5.925GHz)Bandwidth
DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communication)
10
DSRC for cooperative vehicle information
positionspeedintent…
Analyze a practical situation
Animation. 2
11
DSRC for cooperative vehicle information
positionspeedintent…For me!
Not For me!
Who affects the most ?
Animation. 2
12
Terms
Abnormal Vehicle (AV) A vehicle acts abnormally, e.g. deceleration
exceeding a certain threshold, dramatic change of moving direction, major mechanical failure, etc.
Emergency Warning Messages (EWM) Messages generated by an AV to warn other
surrounding vehicles, which include the geographical location, speed, acceleration and moving direction of the AV.
13
Requiring to support multiple co-existing AVs over a longer period of time
Co-existing AVs: AVs whose existences overlap in time and whose transmissions may interfere with each other
An AV can exist for an extended period of time
Chain effects of emergency road situation
Application Challenges <1>
Fig.3
14
Application Challenges <2>
Differentiation of emergency events and elimination of redundant EWMs
Unnecessary EWMs should be avoided so that the channel bandwidth can be better utilized for useful EWMs
Fig.4
15
Eliminate redundant EWMs
State transitions of AVs
Initial AV: When an emergency event occurs to a vehicle, the vehicle becomes an AV and enters the initial AV state, transmitting EWMs following the rate decreasing algorithm.
Flagger AV: resuming EWM transmissions at the minimum required rate.
Non-flagger AV: nonparticipating in sending EWMs to the group on some conditions to eliminate redundant EWMs
Each AV may be in one of three states:
16
State transitions of AVs (condition.)
Transitions from Non-flagger AV to flagger AV
sets a timer for a Flagger Timeout ( FT) duration. If it does not receive any EWMs from its followers when the FT timer expires, the non-flagger AV changes its state to flagger AV.
Transitions from Initial AV state to Non-flagger AV state:
At least Talert duration has elapsed since the time when the vehicle became an initial AV.
EWMs from one of the “followers” of the initial AV are being overheard;
Transitions from flagger AV to Non-flagger AV
If a flagger AV receives EWMs from one of its followers, it will relinquish its flagger responsibility, becoming a non-flagger AV.
17
Examples of state transitions
Fig. 5a
Fig. 5c
Fig. 5b
18
Examples of state transitions (cont.)
Fig. 5d
19
Future Works
Car2Car Communication Consortium ( www.car-to-car.org )
Non-profit organization initiated by European vehicle manufacturers. To create and establish an open European industry standard for
Car2Car communication systems based on wireless LAN components and to guarantee European-wide inter-vehicle operability
Vehicle manufacturers would install the technology in all new vehicles, beginning at a particular model year
Full-scale deployment in both the vehicles and the roadside infrastructure will be made by 2008/9
USDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program
20
HiBuddy
A new era is arriving where vehicles will communicate with each other, the devices within them, and also with the world; making the next generation of vehicles into communication hubs.
Conclusion
An Overview of Vehicular Comm. is given.
Protocol of Vehicular Comm. Is discussed.
Protocol Challenges are also analysed.
21
References
[1] S. Biswas, "Vehicle-to-Vehicle Wireless Communication Protocols for Enhancing Highway Traffic Safety," Communications Magazine, IEEE Publication Date: Jan. 2006 Volume: 44, Issue: 1 page(s):74- 82
[2] X. Yang et al., " A Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Protocol for Cooperative Collision Warning,"Proc. 1st Annual Int’l. Conf. Mobile and Ubiquitous Syst: Networking and Services, 2004
[3] G.S Bickel, "Inter/Intra-Vehicle Wireless Communication" at http://userfs.cec.wustl.edu/~gsb1/index.html
[4] Q. Xu, R. Sengupta, and D. Jiang, "Design and Analysis of Highway Safety Communication Protocol in 5.9 GHz Dedicated Short-Range Communication Spectrum," Proc. IEEE VTC, vol. 57, no. 4, 2003, pp. 2451–55
[5] C.Bettstetter "Toward Internet-Based Car Communications: On Some System Architecture And Protocol Aspects" TUM, Germany
[6] J. Zhu and S. Roy, "MAC for Dedicated Short Range Communications in Intelligent Transport Systems,"IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 41, no. 12, 2003
[7] http://www.car-to-car.org/
22
Questions ?
http://arunkumaranand.bizhat.com/seminar
For online Documentation & Support