Upload
mabel-marshall
View
233
Download
13
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 1
WBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic CalorimeterWBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic CalorimeterWBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic CalorimeterWBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter
Roger Rusack
The University of Minnesota
US-CMS L2 ECAL Manager
2US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 2
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
Subsystem overviewProblems and Solutions
Current StatusChangesConcerns
3US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 3
The constructionThe constructionThe constructionThe construction
ECAL Barrel and Endcaps
Supermodule
VFE ModulesGrid
Crystals
Services
36 supermodules 1700 crystals per super-module
~20,000 crystals in endcap
4US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 4
VFE readoutVFE readoutVFE readoutVFE readout
ADC
Energy
Light
Light
Current
Current
Voltage
Voltage Bits
Bits
Light
Avalanche photodiode
FPPA
Bit-serializer
Electro-optics
5US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 5
CalibrationCalibrationCalibrationCalibration
Seven month period of operation in 2006 at low luminosity. CMS goal to observe the Higgs.
• At low luminosity physics channels for calibration are limited by rates.
• Need to start with crystals calibrated to 1%.
• Calibrate every crystal in beam between now and installation.
6US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 6
Calibration ScheduleCalibration ScheduleCalibration ScheduleCalibration Schedule
• Module 0 tests October – Novemebr 2001 to debug whole calibration process.
• Supermodule calibration• SM1 3.5 months in 2002. • SM2 to SM11 2002.• SM12 to SM24 and DEE1 2003• SM25 to SM36 and DEE2 2004
• Sufficient to remeasure ~10 SM’s in 2004.
• Fits with V31 planning.• Install in SX5 EB+ (SM1 – SM18) in 8/2004.• Install in UX5 EB+ (SM1 – SM18) in 11/2004.
7US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 7
Issues at last ReviewIssues at last ReviewIssues at last ReviewIssues at last Review
Crystal production.
Supermodule Mechanics
APD Radiation hardness
Honeywell Bit-serializer
8US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 8
SM Construction ScheduleSM Construction ScheduleSM Construction ScheduleSM Construction Schedule
Production of crystals sets the pace of the supermodule construction at the end.
Module 0’ tests paced by electro-optic components.
Calibration of supermodules paced by electronics delivery at start.
Initial pace set by APD production.
9US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 9
Improvements to the crystal process increased rate of production.
• New method: 2-crystals per boule.
• All Russian crystals to be made this way.
CrystalsCrystalsCrystalsCrystals
36 mm64
mm
10US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 10
Double EE
Double EB
Single EE
Crystal BoulesCrystal BoulesCrystal BoulesCrystal Boules
11US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 11
CMS-ECALCrystal production
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
1/1/
01
3/1/
01
5/1/
01
7/1/
01
9/1/
01
11/1
/01
1/1/
02
3/1/
02
5/1/
02
7/1/
02
9/1/
02
11/1
/02
1/1/
03
3/1/
03
5/1/
03
7/1/
03
9/1/
03
11/1
/03
1/1/
04
3/1/
04
5/1/
04
7/1/
04
9/1/
04
11/1
/04
1/1/
05
3/1/
05
5/1/
05
7/1/
05
9/1/
05
11/1
/05
1/1/
06
3/1/
06
5/1/
06
Barrel
Endcap
SM1 done
EB+ done
EB- done
Dee 1
Dee 2
Dee 3
Dee 4
EB + install
EB - install
EE+ inst EE- inst
Crystal Production
Supermodule Construction
Crystal Production
Crystal ProductionCrystal ProductionCrystal ProductionCrystal Production
12US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 12
MechanicsMechanicsMechanicsMechanics
Major problems last year: Prototype grid failed tolerance requirements.• Tolerance is critical for barrel assembly.
Major redesign of the way grid is made.• Dropped idea of welding three pieces together.• Now simpler bolted solution.• Better cooling.
2 of 4 module prototypes delivered and meet specifications.
Have on order parts for SM1 and SM2.Problem solved
13US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 13
MechanicsMechanicsMechanicsMechanics
Alveola are now tied on their front face
Grid are made by 3 bolted pieces
14US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 14
Bit-SerializerBit-SerializerBit-SerializerBit-Serializer
Last year two failed runs at Honeywelland then 3” ‘safe’ mode run failed.
Three strikes and…
Switched to CERN solution:Giga-optical link. Made in 0.25 process.
Bit error rate test in the 800Mbit/s G-Link mode: 20 hours error free
transmission
Problems with VCSEL driverMods for ECAL. Submission May 2001
Will not be ready for Module 0’
Cheaper…
15US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 15
We need this component in final form for the 2001 calibration test.
• Used to send output of serializer to upper level readout.
• Slow getting components from Methode
• Started second parallel development with Spinner
Major Issues May 2000.
Electro-OpticsElectro-OpticsElectro-OpticsElectro-Optics
Methode
Spinner
16US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 16
FPPA2000 (UHF1x)FPPA2000 (UHF1x)FPPA2000 (UHF1x)FPPA2000 (UHF1x)
ADC
Energy
Light
Light
Current
Current
Voltage
Voltage Bits
Bits
Light
40 MHz Multi-ranging sample-and-hold Intersil UHF-1X process
Joint Lyon-Princeton (LBL) design
1000 parts made. Early results look good. Detailed studies on large quantity now at Lyon.
17US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 17
FPPAFPPAFPPAFPPA
18US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 18
FPPAFPPAFPPAFPPA
Circuit functions as designed.Noise level is 4 × higher than anticipated.
OK for module 0’ tests – will need another engineering run
19US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 19
APD’sAPD’sAPD’sAPD’s
Problem all last year with radiation damage.• APD’s survival goal is 0.1% level to ensure energy
resolution required to observe the Higgs.• 5% failure rate seen in proton beam at PSI.• Requirements 2×1013 neutrons/cm2 and 10 kGy gammas
over 10 years.• Proton beam delivers full dose in 2 hours.
Changes• Compared neutron with protons. With neutrons 100%
survival. • Effect of ionizing dose is rate dependent.• Improve APD design
20US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 20
Radiation Damage to APD’sRadiation Damage to APD’sRadiation Damage to APD’sRadiation Damage to APD’s
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
time [sec]
APD #220
APD #222
APD #234
APD #241
Time
Curr
en
t
21US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 21
Changes to APD’sChanges to APD’sChanges to APD’sChanges to APD’s
Move n+ in away from p
Increase gap
22US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 22
Californium SourceCalifornium SourceCalifornium SourceCalifornium Source
23US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 23
Neutron IrradiationNeutron IrradiationNeutron IrradiationNeutron IrradiationNeutron irradiation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0:00:00 24:00:00 48:00:00 72:00:00 96:00:00 120:00:00 144:00:00 168:00:00 192:00:00 216:00:00
Time Hours
Cu
rren
t
Every APD has survived neutron irradiation
135 irradiated so far
24US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 24
MonitorMonitorMonitorMonitor
Ti:Saphire laser pumped by a Nd:YLF laser.
• Light output at 440 or 490 nm.
• Used to monitor changes to the crystal response between calibration cycles.
• Two lasers required to ensure continuous operation during supermodule calibration.
• Ship first laser August ’01
• Second one early 2002.
25US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 25
Monitor Light SourceMonitor Light SourceMonitor Light SourceMonitor Light Source
26US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 26
Cost estimate changesCost estimate changesCost estimate changesCost estimate changes
Major cost changes.
Honeywell to IBM switch. ($640k)
Peter Denes -- Princeton to LBL. $350kExtra engineering effort. $100kSpinner development contract $110kProductization of FPPA $150kCalifornium cost change $ 75k
27US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 27
L2 and L3 milestones.L2 and L3 milestones.L2 and L3 milestones.L2 and L3 milestones.
Delays in mechanics and APD and Electronics in production
ML2 - Module 0 complete - 8 month delay.ML2 - SM1 completed – 15 month delay.
28US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, 2001 28
ConcernsConcernsConcernsConcerns
Points to watch in near future.• Production of the electro-optics components
for Module 0’.
• Production start of FPPA.
• Bit-serializer and SEU effects.
• Establish procedures for electronics radiation hardness QA/QC.
• Readiness for calibration.