7
1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

1

UOS Application Dialog

IntroductionDagobert Soergel

College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

Page 2: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

2

Purpose of this session

• Identify benefits of upper ontologies

• Identify benefits of aligning existing upper ontologies

• Identify requirements for upper ontologies

• Identify research issues

Page 3: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

3

Purpose of this session

• Identify benefits of upper ontologiesIdentify applications where the use of an upper ontology gives– improved efficiency in system creation and/or – better system performance in terms of better reasoning

or retrieval etc.• Identify benefits of aligning existing upper ontologies

for improving interoperability among applications • Identify requirements for upper ontologies

from the perspective of (potential) adopters• Identify research issues on the path towards

meeting application requirements and interoperability

Page 4: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

4

Agenda

9:00 AM - Introduction – Dagobert Soergel   

9:10 AM - Upper Ontologists: Application examples

10:10 AM - Stakeholders and potential funders

10:30 AM - Break   

11:00 AM - Open dialog: Potential of upper ontologies

– Upper ontologists    – Stakeholders– Application builders

12:00 NOON - ADJOURN

Page 5: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

5

Agenda

9:10 AM - Upper Ontologists: Application examplesCyc applications – Doug Lenat, CycorpSUMO applications – Adam Pease, Articulate SoftwareISO 15926 applications – Matthew West, ShellDOLCE applications – Nicola Guarino

ChargePresent an example where the use of an upper ontology

made a real difference in practice; Help those not steeped in logic understand the need for

formalization and axioms; Illustrate the importance of aligning existing upper ontologies

to achieve interoperability among practical applications.

Page 6: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

6

Agenda

10:10 AM - Stakeholders and potential funders

John Walker, NSA

TBA, NSF

Charge

Comments and reactions to the presentations with a view to next steps towards implementation

Page 7: 1 UOS Application Dialog Introduction Dagobert Soergel College of Information Studies, University of Maryland

7

Agenda

11:00 AM - Open dialog: Potential of upper ontologies – Upper ontologists    – Stakeholders– Application builders

Chris Welty, IBMMike Uschold, BoeingConor Shankey, Visual Knowledge Miles Davis (on Digital Harbor & Metatomix applications)Tom Beckman, Beckman AssociatesDave McComb, Semantic Arts

ChargeGive more examples so we can start to build guidelinesIdentify requirements to make the use of upper ontologies easier.

12:00 NOON - ADJOURN