View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
A prospective standarddesigned to guarantee interoperability of ontologies from the very start (contrast to: post hoc mapping)
established March 2006
11 initial candidate OBO ontologies – focused primarily on
1. basic science domains of natural objects
2. investigation domains (of equipment and other artifacts)
3
Ontology Scope URL Custodians
Cell Ontology (CL)
cell types from prokaryotes to mammals
obo.sourceforge.net/cgi-
bin/detail.cgi?cell
Jonathan Bard, Michael Ashburner, Oliver Hofman
Chemical Entities of Bio-
logical Interest (ChEBI)
molecular entities ebi.ac.uk/chebiPaula Dematos,Rafael Alcantara
Common Anatomy Refer-
ence Ontology (CARO)
anatomical structures in human and model
organisms(under development)
Melissa Haendel, Terry Hayamizu, Cornelius
Rosse, David Sutherland,
Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA)
structure of the human body
fma.biostr.washington.
edu
JLV Mejino Jr.,Cornelius Rosse
Functional Genomics Investigation
Ontology (FuGO)
design, protocol, data instrumentation, and
analysisfugo.sf.net FuGO Working Group
Gene Ontology (GO)
cellular components, molecular functions, biological processes
www.geneontology.org
Gene Ontology Consortium
Phenotypic Quality Ontology
(PaTO)
qualities of anatomical structures
obo.sourceforge.net/cgi
-bin/ detail.cgi?attribute_and_value
Michael Ashburner, Suzanna
Lewis, Georgios Gkoutos
Protein Ontology (PrO)
protein types and modifications
(under development)Protein Ontology
Consortium
Relation Ontology (RO)
relationsobo.sf.net/
relationshipBarry Smith, Chris
Mungall
RNA Ontology(RnaO)
three-dimensional RNA structures
(under development) RNA Ontology Consortium
Sequence Ontology(SO)
properties and features of nucleic sequences
song.sf.net Karen Eilbeck
4
RELATION TO TIME
GRANULARITY
CONTINUANT OCCURRENT
INDEPENDENT DEPENDENT
ORGAN ANDORGANISM
Organism(NCBI
Taxonomy?)
Anatomical Entity
(FMA, CARO)
OrganFunction
(FMP, CPRO) Phenotypic
Quality(PaTO)
Organism-Level Process
(GO)
CELL AND CELLULAR
COMPONENT
Cell(CL)
Cellular Compone
nt(FMA, GO)
Cellular Function
(GO)
Cellular Process
(GO)
MOLECULEMolecule
(ChEBI, SO,RnaO, PrO)
Molecular Function(GO)
Molecular Process
(GO)
Annotations plus ontologies yield an ever-growing computer-interpretable map of biological reality.
5
RELATION TO TIME
GRANULARITY
CONTINUANT OCCURRENT
INDEPENDENT DEPENDENT
ORGAN ANDORGANISM
Organism(NCBI
Taxonomy?)
Anatomical Entity
(FMA, CARO)
OrganFunction
(FMP, CPRO) Phenotypic
Quality(PaTO)
Biological Process
(GO)CELL AND CELLULAR
COMPONENT
Cell(CL)
Cellular Compone
nt(FMA, GO)
Cellular Function
(GO)
MOLECULE Molecule
(ChEBI, SO,RnaO, PrO)
Molecular Function(GO)
Molecular Process
(GO)
Building out from the original GO
6
Natural
Disease Ontology (DO)
Drug Ontology (DrO)
Environment Ontology (EnvO)
Systems Biology Ontology (SBO)
Upper Biomedical Ontology (OBO UBO)
Artifactual
Clinical Trial Ontology (CTO)
Biomedical Imaging Ontology (BIO)
(Upper-Level) Investigation Ontology (IO)
Unit Ontology (UO)
Under consideration:
7
RELATION TO TIME
GRANULARITY
CONTINUANT OCCURRENT
INDEPENDENT DEPENDENT
ORGAN ANDORGANISM
Organism
NCBITaxonomy
?
Anatomical
Entity(FMA, CARO)
OrganFunction
(FMP, CPRO) Phenotypi
c Quality(PaTO)
Biological Process
(GO)CELL AND CELLULAR
COMPONENT
Cell(CL)
Cellular Compon
ent(FMA, GO)
Cellular Function
(GO)
MOLECULE Molecule
(ChEBI, SO,RnaO, PrO)
Molecular Function(GO)
Molecular Process
(GO)
Pathological
Investigation
8
InvestigationOntology
Functional Genomic
Investigation Ontology
Clinical Trial Ontology
Imaging Ontology
Unit Ontology
9
CRITERIA
The ontology is OPEN and available to be used by all.
The ontology is in, or can be instantiated in, a COMMON FORMAL LANGUAGE.
The developers of the ontology agree in advance to COLLABORATE with developers of other OBO Foundry ontology where domains overlap.
CRITERIA
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
10
CRITERIA UPDATE: The developers of each ontology
commit to its maintenance in light of scientific advance, and to soliciting community feedback for its improvement.
ORTHOGONALITY: They commit to working with other Foundry members to ensure that, for any particular domain, there is community convergence on a single controlled vocabulary.
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
11
for science
if we annotate a database or body of literature or images with one high-quality biomedical ontology, we should be able to add annotations from a second such ontology without conflicts
orthogonality of ontologies implies additivity of annotations
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
12
CRITERIA
IDENTIFIERS: The ontology possesses a unique identifier space within OBO.
VERSIONING: The ontology provider has procedures for identifying distinct successive versions to ensure BACKWARDS COMPATIBITY with annotation resources already in common use
The ontology includes TEXTUAL DEFINITIONS and where possible equivalent formal definitions of its terms.
CRITERIA
13
CLEARLY BOUNDED: The ontology has a clearly specified and clearly delineated content.
DOCUMENTATION: The ontology is well-documented.
USERS: The ontology has a plurality of independent users.
CRITERIA
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
14
COMMON ARCHITECTURE: The ontology uses relations which are unambiguously defined following the pattern of definitions laid down in the OBO Relation Ontology.*
* Smith et al., Genome Biology 2005, 6:R46
CRITERIA
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
15
Foundational is_apart_of
Spatial located_incontained_inadjacent_to
Temporal transformation_ofderives_frompreceded_by
Participation has_participanthas_agent
OBO Relation Ontology
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
16
Further criteria will be added over time in light of lessons learned in order to bring about a gradual improvement in the quality of Foundry ontologies
ALL FOUNDRY ONTOLOGIES WILL BE SUBJECT TO CONSTANT UPDATE IN LIGHT OF SCIENTIFIC ADVANCE
IT WILL GET HARDER
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
17
But not everyone needs to join
The Foundry is not seeking to serve as a check on flexibility or creativity
ALL FOUNDRY ONTOLOGIES WILL ENCOURAGE COMMUNITY CRITICISM, CORRECTION AND EXTENSION WITH NEW TERMS
IT WILL GET HARDER
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
18
Single inheritance
All terms in ontology are singular nouns
Term-by-term versioning
Uniform naming conventions
Independence of ontology from computational idiom
PROPOSED NEW CRITERIA
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
19
to introduce some of the features of SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW into biomedical ontology development
CREDIT for high quality ontology development work
KUDOS for early adopters of high quality ontologies / terminologies e.g. in reporting clinical trial results
GOALS
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
20
to providing a FRAMEWORK OF RULES to counteract the current policy of ad hoc creation of new annotation schemas by each clinical research group by
REUSABILITY: if data-schemas are formulated using a single well-integrated framework ontology system in widespread use, then this data will be to this degree itself become more widely accessible and usable
GOALS
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
21
to serve as BENCHMARK FOR IMPROVEMENTS in discipline-focused terminology resources
once a system of interoperable reference ontologies is there, it will make sense to calibrate existing terminologies in its terms in order to achieve more robust alignment and greater domain coverage
exploit the avenue of EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (NIH CLINICAL RESEARCH NETWORKS) to foster their use by clinicians
GOALS
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
22
June 2006: establishment of MICheck:
reflects growing need for prescriptive checklists specifying the key information to include when reporting experimental results (concerning methods, data, analyses and results).
MICheck
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
23
MICheck: ‘a common resource for minimum information checklists’ analogous to OBO / NCBO BioPortal
MICheck Foundry: will create ‘a suite of self-consistent, clearly bounded, orthogonal, integrable checklist modules’ *
* Taylor CF, et al. Nature Biotech, in press
MICheck Foundry
The OBO FoundryThe OBO Foundry http://obofoundry.org/http://obofoundry.org/
24
From OBO to OBD: Open Biomedical Data
OBD is part of NCBO BioPortal:
houses data annotated using ontologies– open to all– with a flexible ontology-based schema
25
OBD Foundry
The OBD Foundry– data annotated using OBO Foundry ontologies– emphasis on coordination especially with
NCBO Driving Biological Projects• linking genes to disease via model organism
mutant phenotypes• high-quality clinical trial data• additivity of annotations implies additivity of data