41
1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna, Bulgaria; June 2009 Presented By: David E. Beaumont

1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

1

The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality

Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States

Varna, Bulgaria; June 2009Presented By: David E. Beaumont

Page 2: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

2

Challenges

• Gap between existing workforce skills and workplace demands

National versus state requirements

Defining the competencies & standards of the workplace

Alignment of training programs with the workplace

Insuring quality programs and services are delivered

Page 3: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

3

Goals

• Develop an understanding regarding the different stakeholder groups involved with the local community colleges in developing programs and services

• The frequency of use of different stakeholders in various economic development activities

Page 4: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

4

Conceptual Framework

• Community College Involvement Framework

Examines how interacting with stakeholders may influence positive outcomes for programs and services

Activities

Community College Involvement Conceptual Framework

Stakeholders’ Involvement

Colleges’ Community Involvement

Program Outcomes

Page 5: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

5

Conceptual Framework continued

• “. . . quantity and quality of the physical and psychological energy that [is] invested” in achieving a desired outcome (Astin, 1999, pg. 528)

• Usefulness of policies and practices could be measured by the degree of involvement each elicits

• Institution’s service area can improve its economic fortunes by encouraging stakeholder involvement

• A strong association between positive performance and goal attainment with higher levels of involvement

Page 6: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

6

Methods

• The study used a data collection strategy Pilot-tested survey data collection method to

describe the type of stakeholders involved and the frequency of their involvement

• Variables examined are expanded upon from the following Self-audit survey developed by Johnson

(2000) Workforce Investment Act (WIA) requirements

Page 7: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

7

Sample

• 482 public community colleges that have a defined service area An accredited institution of higher education

characterized by a two-year curriculum that leads to either the associate degree or transfer to a four-year college. (Gleazer, 1968; Baker, 1999)

A service area is defined as a “formally designated area or region that a community college has been committed to serve the needs” of the local constituents (Vaughan, 2006, p. 6).

Page 8: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

8

Sample

• Community college Chief Economic Development Officer (CEDO) as designated by the Chief Executive Officers (CEO) at the institution.

CEO

CAO (Chief Academic Officer)

CEDO

Page 9: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

9

Colleges in the RUPRI System

12

30

20

15

CT12

3

42

17

26

7

7

1

20

33

57

RI1

62

23

32

7

167

Page 10: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

10

22 States in the RUPRI Systemwith Defined Service Areas

• Alabama Arkansas Colorado Connecticut

• Florida Idaho Illinois Michigan

• Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada

• New Jersey New York N. Carolina R. Island

• Texas Virginia Washington W. Virginia

• Wisconsin Wyoming

Page 11: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

11

Stakeholder Groups

• Education Providers

• Governmental Bodies

• Private Sector

• Internal Groups

Page 12: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

12

Type of External Stakeholders

• Education Providers K-12

Public. 4-yr Universities and Colleges

Vocational Technical Schools

Private. 4-yr Universities and Colleges

Page 13: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

13

Results: Educational Stakeholders

• K-12

Page 14: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

14

Results: Educational Stakeholders

• Vocational and Technical Schools

Page 15: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

15

Results: Educational Stakeholders

• Other Community Colleges

Page 16: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

16

Results: Educational Stakeholders

• Public 4-year Universities and Colleges

Page 17: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

17

Results: Educational Stakeholders

• Private 4-year Colleges and Universities

Page 18: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

18

Type of External Stakeholders

• Governmental Local Government

Workforce Development Board

State Economic Development Authority

Local Economic Development Authority

Page 19: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

19

Results: Government Stakeholders

• Local Cities and Counties Governments

Page 20: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

20

Results: Government Stakeholders

• Local Economic Development Authority

Page 21: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

21

Results: Government Stakeholders

• Local Workforce Development Boards

Page 22: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

22

Results: Government Stakeholders

• State Economic Development Authority

Page 23: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

23

Type of External Stakeholders

• Private Sector Local Chamber Local Civic Organizations

Local Business

Philanthropic Organizations

Page 24: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

24

Results: Private Sector Stakeholders

• Local Chamber of Commerce

Page 25: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

25

Results: Private Sector Stakeholders

• Local Civic Organizations

Page 26: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

26

Results: Private Sector Stakeholders

• Local Businesses

Page 27: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

27

Results: Private Sector Stakeholders

• Foundations or other Philanthropic Organizations

Page 28: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

28

Type of Internal Stakeholders

• Staff

• Faculty

• Students

Page 29: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

29

Results: Internal Stakeholders

• Staff

Page 30: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

30

Results: Internal Stakeholders

• Faculty

Page 31: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

31

Results: Internal Stakeholders

• Students

Page 32: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

32

Stakeholders’ Areas of Involvement in Support of Quality

• Curriculum and Instruction

• Program Review

• Staff Development

Page 33: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

33

Stakeholders’ Areas of Involvement

• Curriculum and Instruction Uses advisory committees to maintain the linkage

between business and community college

Provides cooperative education opportunities for

students in conjunction with business and industry

• Program Review Uses advisory committees to maintain the linkage

between business and community college

Page 34: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

34

Results

• Uses Advisory Committees to Maintain Linkage Between Business and the Committee College

Page 35: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

35

Curriculum and Instruction

• Identify and expand the use of new technologies

• Compare program content with occupational competencies and tasks

• Advise on labor market trends

• Recommend instructional materials and assist in obtaining them

• Promote and assist in maintaining quality programs

• Assist with incorporating soft skills in the curriculum

• Endorse new program applications as appropriate

Page 36: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

36

Program Review

• Assist in program evaluation efforts

• Recommend program goals and objectives

• Assess student performance standards to ensure they are in line with business and industry standards

• Assess, recommend, and/or provide equipment and facilities

• Review student follow-up reports

• Identify new programs or elimination of obsolete programs

• Assist in short and long-term planning for program improvement

Page 37: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

37

Stakeholders’ Areas of Involvement

• Staff Development Provides faculty with the opportunity to

upgrade their occupational skills through a

back-to-industry program

Page 38: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

38

Staff Development

• Invite faculty and staff to participate in industry professional development activities

• Provide instructors with retraining/back-to-industry and summer opportunities for technical upgrading

• Conduct workplace tours

Page 39: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

39

Results

• Forms Partnerships with Local Business and Government Agencies

Page 40: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

40

Results

• Uses Partnerships to Actively Recruit Business to Service Area

Page 41: 1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,

41

Questions

&

Answers