Upload
marianna-morton
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
The Economic Effect of Governmental Incentives on the
Ethanol Fuel Market
Quinn KelleyGraduate Student
University of Georgia
2
Problem Statement
• Limited research available on the market for ethanol.
• To determine the effectiveness of current subsidies for ethanol, the economic structure of the fuel-blending market for ethanol is required.
3
Objectives• Investigate the impact market determinants
have on the ethanol market.
• Develop an econometric model of the fuel-blending market demand and supply for ethanol.
• Based on this econometric model, elasticities are calculated and implications for this highly subsidized market are discussed.
4
Alternative Fuel Legislation
• Alternative Motor Fuels Act (AMFA) of 1988
• Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990
• Energy Policy Act (EPACT) of 1992• Federal Ethanol Subsidy of $0.54 per
gallon• Additional State Subsidies
5
Ethanol• Ethanol is an alcohol-based, colorless liquid
fuel with a characteristic odor.• Currently, ethanol is used as a fuel additive
in gasoline.• In the U.S., corn is the predominant
feedstock in ethanol production.• Ethanol is produced through a process of
fermenting and distilling starch crops that have been converted into simple sugars.
6
Competition
Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
• First synthesized in the early 1960s and commercial production began in 1979.
• Classified as a volatile organic compound (VOC).
• Produced by a chemical reaction between methanol and isobutylene.
7
Empirical ModelDemand
QitD = β0 + β1Pwt + β2Pgt + β3Vit + β4CAAAit + Σ5
j=1βj+4Rji + εitD
Q = annual ethanol quantity soldPw = lagged price wedge (Peth – Pmtbe)Pg = annual grade-weighted wholesale price of gasolineV = annual number of registered vehicles by stateCAAA = Clean Air Act non-attainment dummy variableR = regional dummy variable
8
Empirical ModelSupply
QitS = α0+ α1 Pwt + α2Pcit + α3Si + Σ5
j=1αj+3Rji + εitS
Pc = state-level annual corn price
S = state-level annual subsidy
9
Data
• Data were collected from the Economic Research Service, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Energy Information Administration, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
• The data set includes: 1988 to 2002 annual observations by state.
10
Tobit Two-Stage Least Squares Results
Demand Coefficients
Standard
Errors Elasticities
Intercept -58.820* 8.490
Price Wedge -99.199* 12.924 0.81
Price of Gasoline 17.014* 4.565 0.86
No. of Vehicles 18.095* 2.613 0.28
CAAA 13.935* 2.613
Regions
1
2
3
4
5
3.329
8.339*
56.534*
-2.567
2.557
3.843
2.685
4.614
2.961
2.340*Significantly different from zero at the 5% significance level
11
Tobit Two-Stage Least Squares Results
Supply Coefficients
Standard
Errors Elasticities
Intercept 347.292* 34.307
Price Wedge 0.889* 0.093 8.17
Price of Corn -38.804* 4.342 -4.23
Subsidy -0.837* 0.043 -2.36
Regions
1
2
3
4
5
-2.021
-20.211*
37.001*
-20.583*
-7.651*
4.207
3.569
8.131
3.070
2.863
*Significantly different from zero at the 5% significance level
12
0
pf
pm
QS
QDQD’
Ethanol
PriceShare borne byfuel- marketing firms
Share borne bymanufacturers
13
Market Implications• With fuel-marketing firms bearing the major
impact of any ethanol subsidy removal (91%), any reduction in the subsidy will negatively impact ethanol’s competitiveness over MTBE.
• A gradual phase-down of the subsidy will be dramatic for the industry.
• A 45% reduction in the ethanol subsidy will result in the elimination of the ethanol market.
14
Impacts
• If a state is designated in non-attainment, ethanol demand will increase by 14 million gallons.
• An elastic input demand for corn limits any bargaining leverage corn producers have in their attempts to influence market price.
• The increases in state ethanol subsidies over the last decade have not resulted in inducing a positive ethanol supply response.
15
Conclusions• The economic structure of the ethanol
market indicates ethanol agents are addicted to the federal tax exemption on ethanol blended fuels.
• The potential for demand expansion resides in structural shifts occurring from clean air and water regulations, health restrictions, renewable fuels, and global warming.