Upload
arthur-small
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
TEPCO’s ALARA Program(Basic Policy of Mid- and Long-
Term Exposure Reduction)
Toshiyuki HAYASHIDATokyo Electric Power Company
Radiation Protection Group
ISOE Asian ALARA Symposium
September 12-13, 2007, Seoul, KOREA
2
Contents• TEPCO situations
– Exposure trends– ALARA activities
• Improvement of Process– Objectives and Approach– Identifying gaps– Scope of Activities
• Improved Process– Mid-/long-term dose target process
• Basic policy for mid- and long-term
– Outage dose target process
3
Profile - Location
4
TEPCO’s Nuclear Power Plants
17 BWRs including 2 ABWRs (total capacity 17,308MWe) - 28% of generation capacity - 41% of generated electricity (FY 2006)
5
TEPCO’s Nuclear Power PlantsUnit Type Capacity
(MW)
CommercialOperation Start
No.1 BWR-3 460 Mar.1971No.2 BWR-4 784 Jul.1974No.3 BWR-4 784 Mar.1976No.4 BWR-4 784 Oct.1978No.5 BWR-4 784 Apr.1978No.6 BWR-5 1100 Oct.1979No.1 BWR-5 1100 Apr.1982No.2 BWR-5 1100 Feb.1984No.3 BWR-5 1100 Jun.1985No.4 BWR-5 1100 Aug.1987No.1 BWR-5 1100 Sep.1985No.2 BWR-5 1100 Sep.1990No.3 BWR-5 1100 Aug.1993No.4 BWR-5 1100 Aug.1994No.5 BWR-5 1100 Apr.1990No.6 ABWR 1356 Nov.1996No.7 ABWR 1356 Jun.1997
FukushimaDaiichi(1F)
FukushimaDaini(2F)
KashiwazakiKariwa(KK)
6
Exposure Trends in TEPCOPerson-Sv No. of Workers
Fukushima Daiichi NPS
Fukushima Daini NPS
Kashiwazaki Kariwa NPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05Fical Year
Occ
upational D
ose
(Pe
rson-S
v)
0
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
15,000
Num
ber
of
work
ers
7
TEPCO’S ALARA Activities• Radiation Field Control
– Source term removal • Reduced corrosion products from feed water piping by
injecting oxygen
• Use of low-cobalt material
• Use of weatherproof steel in component materials for feed water and condensate system
• Dual condensate purification system
• Flushing and Chemical Decon.
– Shielding • Permanent shielding in PCV• Temporary shielding for high-radiation work
• ALARA Management
8
Annual Collective Dose
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
'80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04
Year
Per
son
-Sv
J apan USA Sweden Spain Finland France Korea
Collective Dose (Person-Sv/yr・ reactor)
FY2005 FY2006
Fukushima Daiichi (1F)
2.6 2.9
Fukushima Daini (2F)
1.1 0.9
Kashiwazaki Kariwa (KK)
1.3 0.9
9
Benchmarking
Collective Dose in BWR 2003-2005 Average( )
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Tar
apur
Per
ry
Fuku
shim
a D
aiic
hi(6
)
Tok
ai-I
I
Qua
d C
ities
(2)
Cof
rent
es
Lagu
na V
erde
(2)
Nin
e M
ile P
oint
(2)
Rin
ghal
s
Bro
wns
Fer
ry(2
)
Col
umbi
a G
en S
ta
Ham
aoka
(4)
LaSal
le(2
)
Shi
man
e(2)
Tsu
ruga
Kuo
shen
g(2)
Fuku
shim
a D
aini
(4)
Dre
sden
(2)
Riv
er B
end(
1)
Pilg
rim(1
)
Shi
ka
Ver
mon
t Yan
kee
Pea
ch B
otto
m(2
)
Coo
per
(1)
Kas
hiw
azak
i Kar
iwa(
7)
Hop
e C
reek
Bru
nsw
ick
(2)
Gun
drem
min
gen
Npp
(2)
Chi
nsha
n(2)
Mon
ticel
lo
Clin
ton
Ferm
i
Gra
nd G
ulf
Mue
hleb
erg
Bru
nsbu
ette
l
Sus
queh
anna
(2)
Leib
stad
t
Fitz
Pat
rick
Kru
emm
el
Phi
lipps
burg
Oys
ter
Cre
ek
Dua
ne A
rnol
d
Hat
ch(2
)
San
ta M
aria
De
Gar
ona
Lim
eric
k (2
)
Isar
Osk
arsh
amn(
3)
Olk
iluot
o(2)
Fors
mar
k(3)
Ona
gaw
a(3)
Col
lect
ive
Dos
ePer
son-
(yr
reac
tor
)(
Sv/
・)
Top Quartile2nd Quartile3rd QuartileBottom Quartile
10
Benchmarking
Fukushima Daiishi Fukushima Daini Kashiwazaki KariwaTomari Onagawa HigashidoriTokai- II Tsuruga1 Tsuruga2Hamaoka Shika MihamaTakahama Ooi ShimaneIkata Genkai Sendai
Ratio of Collective Dose in Japan (FY2006)
1F:26%2F:5%KK:10%TEPCO’s total:41%
11
Objectives • Reshape ALARA Management by;
– Reviewing ALARA management “As-Is” process– Identifying a gap between “As-Is” and “To-Be”
process– Focusing on the interface between radiation
protection and maintenance staff at work planning and post-outage steps
Incorporating ALARA Considerations into Job
More Efficiently and Effectively!
12
• The project team “Dose Target Control Peer Team” organized
• Team Members– Leader : Radiation Protection Manager(H/O)– Permanent Members : Radiation Protection,
Radiation Safety, Chemistry staff from H/O , 1F, 2F, KK
– Temporary Members: Maintenance staff from H/O,1F, 2F, KK
Approach
13
Identifying Gaps
• Lack of mid- and long-term target
• Lack of inter-group communication between RP and maintenance group– Little RP staff involvement of work planning
and post-job performance review – Little chance to identify good practice and
to propose dose reduction measures for job
14
Lack of Mid- / Long-term Target
Vision
Expectations from the management(Division Director,Site President)
Projection of :•Each work dose•Outage dose•Annual dose
Mid- and Long-term Dose Plan
15
Lack of Interface
Annual dose plans
RWA Review / approval
Outage dose plan
Tracking dose
RWA report
Outage report
Long-term plan
Outage plan
Review detailed work schedule
Work management
Post-outage follow-up
Incorporation of lessons learned
Review main work schedule
Maintenance RP
Weak Relations
Weak Relations
16
Team Vision
The Dose Target Control Peer Team facilitates
the Maintenance Department and Radiation
Control Department as they jointly define
provisions to be implemented in each step of
maintenance processes(planning, scheduling,
work and evaluation), and communicate with
each other to evaluate planned and actual
figures in dose targets, thereby achieving dose
reduction.
17
Scope of Activities
Setting Outage Dose Target Process
Planning
Work
Check&Review
Follow-up Action
Setting Mid- and Long-term Dose Target Process Proposal for incorporating
dose reduction measures
Reviewing dose performance
Examining reflection items
for the next outage
Basic Policy for Mid- and Long-term Exposure
Reduction
Dose Target Plans for annual and Mid- /Long-term Exposure
Reduction
Maintenance
Process
Radiation Protection Management
18
Setting Mid- / Long-term Plans
Expectedperformance
Projected performance
The world’s top XX%
The world’s top AA%
Mid- / Long-term and Annual Dose
plans
Basic Policy
out
pu
t
input
Future schedule
Past performance
input
input
New processNew process
Expectations
Vision of site doseperformance
19
Basic Policy
•Proposed by Radiation Protection & Management Group (head office)
•Approval of director of nuclear power plant management department(head office)
•Annually assess implementation results and determine the need for review
Setting basic policy for mid- and long-term exposure reduction
20
Basic Policy
Mid-term : collective dose three years’ average (2007-2009)
Long-term : collective dose three years’ average (2015-2017)
Mid-term : collective dose three years’ average (2007-2009)
Long-term : collective dose three years’ average (2015-2017)
Collective dose in BWR (2003-2005 Average)
Santa
Mari
a D
e G
aro
na(1
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Tara
pur(
1)
Perr
y(1
)
Quad
Cit
ies(
2)
Tokai-
II(1
)
Fukush
ima D
aiic
hi(
6)
Lag
una V
erd
e(2
)
Cofr
ente
s(1
)
Rin
ghals
(1)
Bro
wns
Ferr
y(2
)
Clin
ton(1
)
Nin
e M
ile P
oin
t(2
)
Colu
mb
ia G
en S
ta(1
)
Shim
ane(2
)
Tsu
rug
a(1
)
Shik
a(1
)
Dre
sden(2
)
LaS
alle
(2)
Kuosh
eng
(2)
Pilg
rim
(1)
Verm
ont
Yankee(1
)
Peach
Bott
om
(2)
Fukush
ima D
ain
i(4
)
Ham
aoka(5
)
Hop
e C
reek(1
)
Kash
iwaza
ki K
ari
wa(7
)
Ferm
i(1
)
Riv
er
Bend
(1)
Coop
er(
1)
Gund
rem
min
gen N
pp
(2)
Bru
nsw
ick(2
)
Chin
shan(2
)
Monti
cello
(1)
Muehle
berg
(1)
Gra
nd
Gulf
(1)
Hatc
h(2
)
Susq
uehanna(2
)
Leib
stad
t(1
)
Fit
zPatr
ick(1
)
Kru
em
mel(
1)
Oyst
er
Cre
ek(1
)
Phili
pp
sburg
(1)
Isar(
1)
Lim
eri
ck(2
)
Duane A
rnold
(1)
Osk
ars
ham
n(3
)
Olk
iluoto
(2)
Fors
mark
(3)
Onag
aw
a(3
)
Bru
nsb
uett
el(
1)
Hig
ash
idori
(1
)
線量
人
Sv
/年
・炉
Top Quartile2nd Quartile3rd QuartileBottom Quartile
Fukusima Daini(2F)
Kasiwazaki Kariwa(KK)
Fukusima Daiich(1F)
1F:Mid-term
1F:Long-term 2F,KK:Mid-term
2F,KK:Long-term
21
Basic PolicyMid-Term Long-Term
Fukushima Daiichi (1F)
Approaches the 46th
World’s Third quartile
47th in the world
2.5 Sv/yr ・ reactor
38th in the world
1.8 Sv/yr・ reactor
Fukushima Daini (2F)
World’s Top quartile World’s Top Tenth
13th in the world
1.0 Sv/yr・ reactor0.9 Sv/yr・ reactor
Kashiwazaki Kariwa (KK)
World’s Top quartile World’s Top Tenth
13th in the world
1.0 Sv/yr・ reactor0.9 Sv/yr・ reactor
22
Mid- / Long-term and Annual Dose Plans
• Aim at a basic policy of mid- and long-term (expected performance)
• Proposed by Radiation Safety Group (Site)
• Approval of Site President
• Annually review
• Site president assesses “projected performance” by comparing with “expected performance”, and decides “vision of site dose performance”.
23
Interface between Maintenance and RP
Mid- /Long-term andMid- /Long-term and annual dose plansannual dose plans
RWA Review / approval
Outage dose plan
Tracking dose
RWA report
Outage reportOutage report
RP proposalRP proposal
Involved in work scheduleInvolved in work schedule
Long-term plan
Outage plan
Review detailed work schedule
Work management
Post-outage follow-up
Incorporation of lessons learned
Review main work schedule
Maintenance RP
24
RP Proposal
• Proposed dose reduction measures to maintenance team before outage contract
• RP Proposal– Effecting long-term or short-term(outage)
maintenance plans– For selected job (High radiation work)– Based on lessons learned at former outage
25
Involvement in Work Schedule• RP share information of detailed work
schedule with maintenance team and contractors.
• RP involvement– Suggestions for rearranging the work steps
which achieve significant dose reduction.– Providing dose information of the same
operation areas to maintenance team and contractors (Each job process optimally planned from the perspective of dose reduction).
26
Outage Report• Prepared by RP at post-outage follow-
up step and report out to maintenance team
• Including what maintenance team expect to know about outage jobs
• Involving following information – Dose performance of selected jobs– Proposals for dose reduction measures
that should be reflected to the next outage or other plants
– Punch lists for the proposal.
27
Implementation Program
• Outage dose target process– Trial implemented last year (FY2006)
• Selected a couple of high radiation jobs of each trial plants
• The trial result is being evaluating.
– Full implementation began in April (FY2007)• Coverage is high radiation jobs of each plants
• Mid- and long-term dose target process– Began in April (FY2007)
28
Summary
• The basic policy for mid- and long-term exposure reduction was decided.
• Setting “targets” in the basic policy as well as mid/long-term and annual plans,there was clarified the expectation of the management and the vision of exposure reduction.
• “Mid- and long-term dose target process” and “Outage dose target process” began in April (FY2007)