Upload
gervais-black
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Windows for synchronisation and JP
Citation preview
1
Technical Seminar on Joint Programming 27 November 2012
Session 3 Prospects for additional countries
DEVCO/A3 Aid and Development Effectiveness and FinancingEEAS VI.B.2 Development Cooperation Coordination Division
Purpose of this session
Present our assessment of JP potential and progress made in countries (additional to the six countries)
Collect Member States’ views on JP potential and progress made
Common understanding on prospects of JP for additional list of countries
To make it clear: we are not deciding in which countries JP should be taken on, but identify countries with potential and a way to move ahead (session 4)
Windows for synchronisation and JP2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 ?
Burma/Myanmar Algeria Afghanistan Bangladesh Armenia Nicaragua ChadEthiopia Egypt Cambodia Benin Bolivia HondurasGhana South Sudan (ph2) Comoros Burkina Faso Georgia KenyaGuatemala Tunisia Paraguay Burundi Jordan LiberiaHaiti Cote d'Ivoire Libya MoldovaLaos (transition) El Salvador Senegal Sierra LeoneMali Laos (full) SomaliaoPt Malawi Timor LesteRwanda Mauritania Togo
MoroccoMozambiqueNamibiaNigerTanzaniaVietnamZambiaZimbabwe
First issue for discussion
Do we in general support the proposal to move JP forward in an additional list of countries?
Second issue for discussion
What are the views on our assessment of the potential in the following 16 countries?
JP processes underway in 16 countries
Joint analysis started in: Bolivia, Burma/Myanmar and Burundi; as next step add additional elements of JP
Agreement on JP in: Cambodia (HoMs report), Honduras, Ivory Coast, Paraguay and Senegal to move ahead now or later
Option of JP discussed in: Algeria, Egypt, El Salvador, Liberia and Tanzania; further consultations needed
Follow-up to the Heads of Missions' report: Bangladesh, Moldova and Tunisia
Third issue for discussion
What are the views on other countries’ potential besides these 16 countries?
To be discussed region by region (see next slides)
Joint Programming Potential (1)
West Africa:
Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo
Central Africa:
Burundi, Chad, Rwanda
Joint Programming Potential (2)
East Africa:
Comoros, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Tanzania
Southern Africa:
Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Joint Programming Potential (3)
Asia/Pacific:
Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Burma/Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, Timor Leste, Vietnam
Latin America and Caribbean:
Bolivia, Guatemala, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Paraguay
Joint Programming Potential (4)
Neighbourhood East: Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, [Ukraine]
Neighbourhood South:
Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, oPt, Tunisia
12
Technical Seminar on Joint Programming 27 November 2012
Session 4 Next steps and facilitation
DEVCO/A3 Aid and Development Effectiveness and FinancingEEAS VI.B.2 Development Cooperation Coordination Division
EU Procedure for JP document (1)
For EU part in JP: apply same process /procedure in Brussels as for a bilateral/single proposal without JP
JP document in-country prepared under guidance of heads of missions; including required consultation (CSOs, etc.). This is where support by consultants could come in.
Once agreed by EU HoMs JP doc sent to EEAS and DEVCO; follow in-house assessment procedure (CTM, etc.)
HoD will see that MS and other donors handle the JP doc through their own system (including role of their capitals)
EU Procedure for JP document (2)
Following endorsement by HQs finalise JP in-country with partner country, then initialled by HoMs and if possible partner country
Final document to be transmitted by HoMs to capitals
Adoption and formalisation according to individual donor procedures/requirementsAgain: for the EU part, our own procedure apply: same as for single programming doc, but take account of Member States’ and other donor contributions
Consider signing ceremony (only after legal basis DCI or 11th EDF)
Role of HQs: promotion & facilitation (1)
EEAS/DEVCO will contiune to regularly inform and discuss with Member States:
Council: CODEV working group and FAC/DEV [placeholder: informal ministerial?]
EU Directors General meetings
Technical seminars
Role of HQs: promotion & facilitation (2)
Missions to EU MS capitals by EEAS/DEVCO
In-country support missions: EEAS/DEVCO (possible together with EU MS) and consultants
Joint programming training: open to Member States; option: train the trainers
Country desks: informal network/contacts with EU MS
How to assess JP feasibility in-country: HoMs reports
Transmission note to programming instructions: ‘if in 2012-2013 conducive circumstances for JP, then
send Heads of Mission’s report’
Added value of HoMs reports:Enables shared position of EU and MS on the groundPositive experience in first wave ‘11-country’ exercise
HoMs reports for other countries recommended
Next steps
Technical Seminar on 27 November:- Present current progress- Present potential list of JP countries- Identify potential for additional JP countries
EU Development DGs meeting on 11-12 December- Present, discuss and conclude on outcome of technical seminar
Request for HoMs JP feasibility assessment reports in countries identified
Issues for discussion
On the next steps for the additional countries:- What should we present to the EU DGs meeting?- how should we communicate with our field offices and ensure common/coherent messages should the HoMs report approach be replicated?
How can we ensure that EU and Member States approval procedures of the actual JP documents go in parallel?
How should EEAS/DEVCO further inform/support Member States?