1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    1/13

    International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516

    The characteristics of hotel websites and their implications

    for website effectiveness

    Serje Schmidta,, Antoni Serra Cantallopsb, Cristiane Pizzutti dos Santosc

    aCentro Universitá rio Feevale, RS 239, 2755, 93352-000, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil bUniversitat de les Illes Balears, Ctra. de Valldemossa, km 7.5, Edifici Jovellanos DB211, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain

    cUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Administrac - ão, Rua Washington Luis, 855, 90010-460, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 

    Abstract

    Hotels are increasingly taking advantage of the Internet as a marketing tool able to provide direct contact with customers, but is the

    full potential of this tool being exploited? This article constructs and validates an instrument for the measurement of website

    characteristics and relates those characteristics to website performance, using structural equation modeling. The results indicate that

    small and medium size hotels in the Balearic Islands in Spain, a developed tourist destination, and in the South of Brazil, a developing

    destination, are using their websites as mass media tools; ignoring the potential for interactivity and one-to-one communication. It is

    suggested that hoteliers should adopt a more strategic approach to the Internet, preparing the ground for direct contact with customers.

    r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords:  Hotel; Website; Internet

    1. Introduction

    There is little doubt that the Internet is changing

    marketing practices, from the detection of what consumers

    need to manage their relationships with companies. Some

    websites offer a highly interactive experience, such as the

    Amazon site (www.amazon.com), where users can rate and

    review products and read other consumers’ opinions, and

    so be better equipped to decide between purchasing

    alternatives. Nevertheless, not all products are suited to

    web commerce. Certain distinctions can be made between

    products that are appropriate for Internet commerce and

    those unsuited to this distribution channel. Some featuresof the first group are: products where purchasing decisions

    are based on information, products that can be distributed

    through the web, products that offer consumers a better

    deal when compared to other distribution channels and

    those whose customers have Internet access (Chaffey et al.,

    2003).

    From this perspective, the hospitality industry is in anideal position to exploit the potential of the Internet

    (Palmer and McCole, 2000). With the exception of large

    hotel chains, however, most hotel websites have a limited

    range of functions, such as promotion and point-of-sale.

    Only a few of them are exploring other potentialities, such

    as a support tool for customer relationship management.

    Despite massive promotion of the Internet, it appears that

    hotels are missing out on the opportunity to use the web as

    an effective business tool. However, is this truly the case?

    The aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of 

    website characteristics on website effectiveness in the

    context of small and medium size hotels. To this end,two tourist regions were chosen for study, as much because

    of their differences in terms of tourism as for their relative

    similarity in terms of Internet access: the Balearic Islands in

    Spain and the South of Brazil.

    In order to accomplish our objective, this paper is

    structured as follows. First we address Internet marketing

    and its marketing mix perspectives. We then explore and

    classify previous research focused on website features. We

    continue by constructing a measurement instrument based

    on the marketing mix and website characteristics, and

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhosman

    0278-4319/$- see front matter r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.08.002

    Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 51 99643185; fax: +55 51 35868999.

    E-mail addresses:   [email protected] (S. Schmidt),   [email protected]

    (A.S. Cantallops), [email protected] (C.P. dos Santos).

    http://www.amazon.com/http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhosmanhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_5/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.08.002mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_5/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.08.002http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhosmanhttp://www.amazon.com/

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    2/13

    applying it the websites of hotels in the Balearic Islands

    in Spain and in the South region of Brazil. We proceed

    by describing validation procedures and results and,

    finally, round off with a general discussion about this

    study.

    2. Tourism and Internet penetration in Spain and Brazil

    The differences between the two countries and regions

    can most clearly be illustrated with reference to statistics.

    Spain is considered the world’s second-ranked tourism

    destination, behind the United States in terms of receipts

    from international tourism and behind France in numbers

    of tourist arrivals. The region of the Balearic Islands, with

    an area of less than 5000 km2, is the third-ranked tourist

    destination in Spain, receiving 9.5 million tourists in 2002,

    which represents 10.4% of the country’s tourists. In

    contrast, Brazil has an area of more than 8.5 million km2,

    but occupies fourth position in the Americas in terms of 

    tourist receipts and arrivals, far behind the United States,

    Canada and Mexico, and receives less than half the number

    of tourists of Spain: 3.7 million. Furthermore, the two

    states in the South of Brazil that are studied here—Rio

    Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina—are ranked third in

    Brazil in tourist arrivals, after the states of Sa ˜o Paulo and

    Rio de Janeiro (EMBRATUR, 2004;  Instituto Nacional

    De Estadı ´stica, 2003;   Instituto de Estudios Turı ´sticos,

    2004;  World Tourism Organization, 2003).

    Spain is also more advanced than Brazil in terms of 

    Internet network penetration, but the difference is smaller

    than in tourism. The digital access index (DAI), managed

    by the International Telecommunication Union (2003), is aworldwide standard measure of Internet penetration and

    classifies countries into one of four categories of digital

    access: high, upper, medium and low. According to this

    index, Sweden is the top-rated country in the high access

    group, with a DAI of 0.85, while Niger is the lowest rated

    in the low access group, with a DAI of 0.04. Spain and

    Brazil are in the same upper digital access group, with

    DAIs of 0.67 and 0.50, respectively. These two regions were

    chosen for the present study because of their differences

    from the perspective of the economics of tourism, and their

    similarities in terms of Internet access.

    3. Internet marketing

    According to Hoffman and Novak (1997), the commu-

    nication structures used by companies can be classified as

    one-to-many or many-to-many. In the first case, companies

    must provide content that reaches the public through

    their exposure to mass media, such as TV, radio, news-

    papers, etc. If these companies wish to receive any

    customer feedback, they must provide access via telephone

    lines or mail addresses. In the second case, on the Internet,

    people can interact with content provided by companies,

    expressing their opinions, suggestions and comments.

    These opinions can also be read by other consumers,

    forming interest groups. People can also provide their

    own content to the media, about themselves or about

    companies.

    As the Internet has penetrated people’s lives and

    companies’ business practices, providing interactivity and

    commercial support, it has had a great impact on market-

    ing practices. As a result of this interactivity, in order for aconsumer to be exposed to any given media content, they

    must first be interested in it and take the initiative (Chaffey

    et al., 2003;   Deighton, 1996). In order to maintain that

    interest, the user has to feel comfortable and absorbed

    while experiencing the media content. This behavior is

    defined by  Hoffman and Novak (1997)   as ‘‘flow’’ and by

    Deighton (1996) as ‘‘high intensity’’.

    As the Internet affects marketing practices, some

    attention has been paid to the potential applicability of 

    the marketing mix (McCarthy, 1976) in this new environ-

    ment. Some authors argue that the product, price, point-of-

    sale and promotion dimensions fit in well with the Internet

    (Chaffey et al., 2003), while others propose a complete

    replacement (Constantinides, 2002;   Kotler, 1998). The

    marketing mix was already subject to criticism even before

    the Internet, but it continues to offer the simplicity desired

    by management practices. Some limitations, however, must

    be recognized, especially in the context of the web. The

    following chapters analyze the marketing mix considering

    the influence of the new media.

    3.1. Promotion

    Promotion is the process by which a company commu-

    nicates with the market, providing information about itsproducts and services or about the company itself 

    (McCarthy, 1976). Up to this point, it can be considered

    a one-to-many communication process. The Internet,

    however, provides interactivity as an important additional

    development to this process, and the new concept of 

    promotion must therefore embrace a many-to-many

    communication model. One implication of this new

    concept is that decisions about content must be taken

    more carefully, since users pay more attention to the

    website experience (Chaffey et al., 2003).

    3.2. Point-of-sale

    The Internet offers the possibility of being used as a tool

    both for promotion and for point-of-sale. Depending on

    the market involved, it has not only threatened distribu-

    tors, but also created alternative forms of distribution, an

    effect called redistribution (Pitt et al., 1999). Before

    establishing direct contact with the consumer, suppliers

    must evaluate their relationship with current distribution

    channels, for making direct contact might endanger a

    valuable situation. If the buyer is also the distributor and

    its bargain power is relatively high; then the direct-to-

    consumer approach must be handled carefully (Porter,

    1980).

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516    505

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    3/13

    3.3. Price

    The consumer now has a greater variety of comparable

    offers, which forces market prices down. Nevertheless,

    pressure does not only come from consumers.   Yelkur and

    Dacosta (2001) state that, since the Internet can provide more

    exact information about consumer identification, location,and products desired, it is a better environment for price

    segmentation, or differential pricing, as they describe it.

    3.4. Product

    The potential for product configuration is also greater

    using the Internet than with the traditional market (Ghosh,

    1998). Both basic and extended products can be improved

    with information-based service. In depth technical doc-

    umentation, online support and discussion forums are

    examples of such improvements, resulting in improved use

    of products. Online consumer surveys and improved

    information exchange between suppliers and their partners

    can also offer future product enhancements (Chaffey et al.,

    2003; Quelch and Klein, 1996).

    3.5. Customer relationship and customer retention

    Distinct from   McCarthy’s (1976)   four Ps,   Gro ¨ nroos

    (1995)   proposes a dimension that considers service

    industries and which has gained importance among

    scholars and executives: the customer relationship.

    Although the term customer relationship is widely used,

    no consensus has been reached on its definition.   Harker

    (1999) cited 26 different definitions for this term. However,the same basic principles permeate most studies: the

    establishment of long-term relationships between the

    company and the customer, mutual perception of value

    added and feelings that reinforce the relationship, such as

    trust, loyalty and commitment.

    There is a general agreement among scholars that the

    Internet is an appropriate environment for supplementing

    consumer relationships by increasing customer retention

    (Chaffey et al., 2003;   Gilbert et al., 1999;   Peppers and

    Rogers, 2000; Yelkur and Dacosta, 2001). Certain website

    features help provide the conditions for this, such as the

    possibility of users signing up and further identification

    and the opportunity to reach a large number of people.

    However, users have concerns related to inputting their

    personal information on websites, and so websites must

    provide security and privacy mechanisms.

    4. Website evaluation

    Investigations focused on the evaluation of websites can

    be classified into three categories, based on their research

    method: (1) evaluation by phases, (2) evaluation by

    characteristics and (3) evaluation by characteristics and

    effectiveness. Each category will be dealt with in more

    detail in the following sections.

    4.1. Evaluation by phases

    Research employing this evaluation method presumes

    that the richness of a website’s characteristics is propor-

    tional to the company’s experience in electronic commerce.

    This experience is expressed in website phases, also called

    steps or layers, each comprising certain features. In otherwords, according to these studies, the more experience a

    company has in electronic commerce, the richer its website

    will be.

    Two Australian authors,   Burgess and Cooper (1999)

    developed the model of Internet commerce adoption,

    abbreviated to MICA, which consists of three layers:

    (1) promotion that concerns information about the

    company; (2) provision, which is associated with inter-

    activity; and (3) processing, related to online transactions.

    It could be observed that items belonging to each layer are

    not completely coherent with the concept of promotion

    proposed by  McCarthy (1976). For example, value-added

    information and technical information are classified as

    interactivity, rather than as promotion. These authors later

    ‘‘upgraded’’ their instrument, including new measurement

    items, and renaming it the extended MICA, or eMICA

    (Burgess and Cooper, 2000). The instrument has since been

    employed (Burgess et al., 2001; Doolin et al., 2002) without

    significant modifications.

    Teo and Pian (2003) proposed a web adoption model in

    terms of levels of characteristics, based on a company’s

    objectives in using the Internet: Level 0 is when there is no

    website or just an e-mail account; at Level 1 the company

    wants to occupy a web address or simply establish an initial

    online presence; at Level 2 the company is prospecting,delivering actual information about products; Level 3

    entails business integration, online links to clients and

    suppliers; Level 4 is business transformation. The instru-

    ment was applied to 159 companies in Singapore and some

    relationships between adoption levels and company size or

    strategy were tested using one-way ANOVA.

    Research based on phases or layers tend to reduce the

    complexity of website evaluation, which is desirable for

    practical purposes. However, some limitations should be

    taken into account. The objectives of businesses using the

    Internet are as diverse as their strategies. For example, a

    company may want to integrate its value chain back-

    wards—toward its suppliers—and might achieve business

    integration before even prospecting market. Depending on

    the industry or the firm considered, some characteristics

    may be more developed than other ones, resulting in

    website classification within more than one category and

    distorting subsequent analysis.

    4.2. Evaluation by characteristics

    This method does not suggest a path for website

    development, as evaluation by phases does. On the

    contrary, evaluation by characteristics bases its analysis

    on the presence of website characteristics or functionalities.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516 506

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    4/13

    Therefore, it is more flexible for website evaluation than

    the method described above. Some of the studies that fit

    into this class of evaluation method are described

    immediately below.

    Ho (1997) has been cited by investigations that used the

    evaluation by phases approach (Burgess and Cooper, 1999,

    2000; Burgess et al., 2001; Doolin et al., 2002) and also byinvestigations that used evaluation by characteristics

    (Rachman and Buchanan, 1999). He suggests an evalua-

    tion structure based on a two-dimension matrix. The first

    dimension is named ‘‘purpose’’ and is composed of three

    categories:

     Promotion: information about products and services

    offered to consumers.

      Provision: information to obtain good will, exposure,

    credibility.

      Processing: business transactions.

    The other matrix dimension is named ‘‘value-created’’ and

    has four categories: timely value, custom value; logistic

    value and sensational value.

    Wan (2002)   proposed an instrument for evaluating the

    websites of international tourist hotels and tour operators

    in Taiwan. This author used three categories: user inter-

    face, variety of information and online reservation. User

    interface was defined in terms of ease of access, search

    mechanisms, standard layout and helpful interface. Variety

    of information was about simplicity, relevancy of informa-

    tion, information coverage and hyperlinks. Online reserva-

    tion referred to the presence or absence of online

    reservation systems. The instrument contained a consider-able number of subjective items, such as ‘‘physical access to

    website’’ measured by a 5-point Likert scale. To reduce the

    undesirable effects of this subjectivity, the instrument was

    applied by two assistants.

    In one of the few studies focusing on Brazilian hotels,

    Rocha (2003)   qualitatively analyzed the websites of 50

    hotels in Rio de Janeiro using a 61-item instrument which

    were broken down into general characteristics, travel

    information, general information, special characteristics,

    design and functionality, product information and reserva-

    tion facilities. On the subject of future research in the area,

    the author indicated the need for studies focusing on hotel

    characteristics related to the perception of hotel marketers

    and comparisons of distinct tourist regions.

    One study using evaluation by characteristics that

    employed a more consistent method, relative to other

    studies found in the literature, was carried out by Muylle et

    al. (2004). Their objective was to define and validate the

    ‘‘website user satisfaction’’ construct, in the context of the

    tourism distribution industry. The scale was constructed

    using a qualitative approach and then validated quantita-

    tively. After cleaning up the initial constructs, the final

    scale included the following categories: information,

    connection, layout and languages. The measurement

    instrument was then applied to 719 web users and

    statistically validated, using confirmatory analysis and

    structural equation modeling.

    With the exception of the study cited above, studies that

    used characteristics for classification did not present

    sufficient evidence of construct validation. This is relevant

    to the extent that the ideas proposed theoretically may not

    actually be represented by the measurement items appliedempirically, which seriously limits the analysis of results.

    Furthermore, this study methodology suggests that the

    adoption of certain website characteristics should be based

    on what other competitors have, in a benchmarking

    approach. However, can benchmarking alone help practi-

    tioners decide on their website structure? On what grounds

    can an organization decide which characteristics their

    website should have? How relevant is analysis of website

    characteristics if it does not associate them with the

    effectiveness of websites as marketing tools? Other studies

    have addressed these issues by introducing effectiveness

    assessment to website analysis.

    4.3. Evaluation by characteristics and effectiveness

    When websites are approached from a perspective of 

    their effectiveness, their characteristics gain a fresh prag-

    matic relevance, probably welcomed by practitioners.

    Authors that have adopted this approach have understood

    the construct ‘‘website effectiveness’’ in different ways:

    financial results, consumer intentions, etc. Not many

    studies have been undertaken with this perspective; some

    that have are described immediately below.

    Mummalaneni (2005) proposed an analysis structure in

    which the features web shopping environments areassociated with shoppers’ emotional status and this in turn

    with behavior and shopping intentions. Previously existing

    scales were used and the author verified their reliability

    using Cronbach’s alpha, but the scale’s validity was not

    assessed. After regression analysis, the author concluded

    that website characteristics were associated with emotional

    status, but not with shopping intentions. Neither was

    emotional status associated with shopping intentions.

    Investigating the influence of content, design and privacy

    and security on shopping intentions,   Ranganathan and

    Ganapathy (2002)   evaluated these dimensions using

    exploratory factor analysis and associated them with

    shopping intentions by multiple discriminant analysis.

    Security was found to be the primary factor affecting

    shopping intentions, followed by privacy, design and, last

    of all, content. The model was able to explain just 21.9% of 

    variance in shopping intention, which left much of the

    variance out of the model.

    Using an approach from cognitive psychology,   Rosen

    and Purinton (2004)   created a website preference scale

    (WSPS). Their initial constructs for website characteristics

    were coherence, complexity, legibility and mystery. Website

    effectiveness was measured by (1) general impression of 

    website and (2) probability of a return visit to it.

    Exploratory factor analysis was applied, rejecting the

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516    507

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    5/13

    mystery construct. A bivariate procedure, ANOVA, was

    used to verify the relationship between website character-

    istics and their effectiveness, and the authors concluded

    that all constructs had a strong impact on website results.

    After observing the studies presented here, from evalua-

    tion by phases and characteristics through to approaches

    using effectiveness analysis, it is possible to state that thereis no single consolidated method for the purposes of this

    investigation. This may be due to the different back-

    grounds from which this theme has been approached,

    possibly because of its complexity or even because of the

    short period for which it has been subject to academic

    investigation.

    5. Method

    This study can be qualified as descriptive, because it

    describes the scenario of website structure in small hotels,

    and quantitative, because it uses quantitative data for this

    purpose. Data collection and analysis was a four-stage

    process:

    1. items for observing website characteristics were collected

    from literature;

    2. e-mails were sent to hotel marketing managers request-

    ing their opinion of their website’s effectiveness;

    3. the websites of hotels that answered the e-mail

    were measured by the author using the items collected

    in step 1;

    4. the measurement model was validated and a struc-

    tural model was developed for the purposes of this

    investigation.

    Each of these steps is detailed below.

    5.1. Measurement items for website characteristics

    The characteristics of each website were collected by

    reference to a series of items organized into categories.

    Initially, the four Ps of  McCarthy’s (1976) were elected as

    categories: promotion, price, product, and point-of-sale.

    The name of this last category was changed to reservation

    system, in order to make it more applicable to the hotel

    industry. Then, in response to the limitations of 

    McCarthy’s marketing mix in the new marketing environ-

    ment, new categories were included: multimedia, navig-

    ability, customer retention and a single category addressing

    both privacy and security issues. The complete measure-

    ment instrument is given in  Table 1.

    A brief description follows of the main references on

    which each category is grounded:

    Promotion: The concept of promotion used in this

    research adheres to that of  McCarthy (1976), i.e., commu-

    nication from the company to the market, about its

    products and services or about company identity. Most

    of the authors referred to have used this concept in their

    research (Bell and Tang, 1998; Burgess and Cooper, 2000;

    Cox and Dale, 2002;   Ho, 1997;   Huizingh, 2000;   Muylle

    et al., 2004;  Ranganathan and Ganapathy, 2002;  Rocha,

    2003; Teo and Pian, 2003; Wan, 2002), but not all of them

    use the term ‘‘promotion’’ to describe the concept. For

    example,   Bell and Tang (1998),   Huizingh (2000)   and

    Ranganathan and Ganapathy (2002) use ‘‘content’’. Other

    expressions used in this sense are ‘‘provision’’ (Burgess etal., 2001), ‘‘variety of information’’ (Wan, 2002) and

    ‘‘online resources’’ (Cox and Dale, 2002), to mention just a

    few variations. This category included text and photos

    about the hotel, its rooms and the tourist region. Ho (1997)

    and   Cox and Dale (2002)   included website design and

    graphics in their concept of promotion, whereas most

    authors include these in assessment of navigability. The

    items used to measure promotion in the present study were

    related to hotel-specific information about hotel services,

    rooms and the tourism opportunities of the surrounding

    region, taking account of the volume and form of 

    presentation of this information, the amount of text and

    photos.

    Price: In this category we measured whether price

    segmentation was being practiced by hotels on their

    websites. If a hotel requested any form of identification

    in order to access room prices, this was considered a

    segmentation strategy, in a simpler scale than the one used

    by Yelkur and Dacosta (2001).

    Product: This category assesses the presence of product

    configuration practices, represented by any structured

    information that could possibly be entered during the

    reservation process. Any information such as proximity to

    the elevator, sea view, pillow type, etc. was considered

    product configuration (Ghosh, 1998;   Piccoli et al., 2002;Quelch and Klein, 1996).

    Multimedia: Assesses the availability of videos or 3D

    photos of hotel services, rooms and the tourist region.

    Some authors have used the term ‘‘design’’ to indicate the

    presence of such characteristics (Cox and Dale, 2002;

    Ranganathan and Ganapathy, 2002;   Rocha, 2003), but

    the term multimedia was preferred here, since ‘‘design’’

    was also used to represent website navigation struc-

    ture (Huizingh, 2000). Some authors even include both

    concepts—structure and multimedia—under the term

    ‘‘design’’, which may confuse its meaning.

    Navigability: Measures how easy it is for users to access the

    information they want on the website, including standard

    menu structure, home-page links, standard page design and

    the indication of user position in the menu structure. Most

    authors have used this same concept and items in their

    research (Bell and Tang, 1998; Cox and Dale, 2002; Huizingh,

    2000;   Muylle et al., 2004;   Ranganathan and Ganapathy,

    2002; Rocha, 2003; Rosen and Purinton, 2004; Teo and Pian,

    2003;   Wan, 2002), but some included the same meaning

    under other headings, such as ‘‘design’’, ‘‘structure’’, ‘‘user

    friendliness’’, ‘‘ease of use’’, ‘‘coherence’’, and so on.

    Reservation system: Measures the capacity of the hotel’s

    website to provide room reservations. This concept has

    also been used by   Bell and Tang (1998),   Burgess et al.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516 508

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    6/13

    (2001),   Huizingh (2000),   Piccoli et al. (2002)   and others;

    although it was referred to as ‘‘online transaction’’,

    ‘‘processing’’, ‘‘reservation facilities’’, and so on. However,

    the available literature did not explore the fact that the

    mere existence of a reservation system, whether by e-mail

    or automatic information system, does not ensure that the

    reservation process actually works. Therefore, reservation

    requests were placed with all hotels, and the time between

    the reservation request and their response was recorded.

    The items included in this category were the presence of a

    reservation process, sales policy (Cox and Dale, 2002) and

    the reservation process response time.

    Customer retention: Refers to website characteristics that

    help hotels to retain their clients, helping to establish long-term

    relationships with them. There was no consensus in the

    literature about the term used to represent this concept. Terms

    like ‘‘customer service’’ and ‘‘relationship services’’ are related

    to this concept, but others like ‘‘website usefulness’’ (Bell and

    Tang, 1998), ‘‘provision’’ (Burgess et al., 2001) or ‘‘processing’’

    (Ho, 1997), that include items referring to customer retention,

    are more difficult to associate. In common with the reservation

    system category, an item measuring the time taken to provide

    client feedback was included. Customer forms and e-mails

    were sent to hotels in order to ask for information, and the

    time between sending and receiving a reply was registered. The

    items included in this category were the presence of a loyalty

    program, user registration form, newsletter, FAQ and the time

    taken to provide client feedback.

    Privacy and security: Refers to items that afford website

    customers a sense of privacy and security (Burgess et al.,

    2001; Cox and Dale, 2002;   Ranganathan and Ganapathy,

    2002;   Rocha, 2003). This has also been referred to as

    ‘‘customer confidence’’ (Cox and Dale, 2002). Items

    recorded were secure credit card web page, security policy

    and privacy policy.

    5.2. Measurement items for website effectiveness

    Measuring the effectiveness of marketing tools in general

    is very useful for managers. It helps them understand which

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Table 1

    Measurement items for website characteristics

    Promotion

    HServText Hotel services text 0 ¼ no text; 0.33 ¼ citation; 0.67 ¼ simple; 1 ¼ complete Ordinal

    HServPhoto Hotel services photos 0 ¼ no photo; 0.33 ¼ 1 photo; 0.67 ¼ 2 to 4 photos; 1 ¼ +4 photos Ordinal

    RoomText Room text 0 ¼ sin text; 0.33 ¼ citation; 0.67 ¼ simple; 1 ¼ complete Ordinal

    RoomPhoto Room photos 0 ¼ no photo; 0.33 ¼ 1 photo; 0.67 ¼ 2 to 4 photos; 1 ¼ +4 photos Ordinal

    RegionText Surroundings text 0 ¼ sin text; 0.33 ¼ citation; 0.67 ¼ simple; 1 ¼ complete Ordinal

    RegionPhoto Surroundings photos 0 ¼ no photo; 0.33 ¼ 1 photo; 0.67 ¼ 2 to 4 photos; 1 ¼ +4 photos Ordinal

    Price

    PriceAccessID Presence of price segmentation 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    Product

    ProductConfig Presence of product configuration features 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    Multimedia

    HServVideo Hotel services videos or 3D photos 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    RoomVideo Room videos or 3D photos 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    RegionVideo Surroundings videos or 3D photos 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    Navigability

    StandDesign Standard page design 0 ¼ no; 1 ¼ yes Ordinal

    StandMenu Standard menu structure 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present OrdinalMenuPosition Structure localization information 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    LinksHome Home page links 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    Reservation system

    ReservSystem Type of reservation system 0 ¼ no reservation; 0.33 ¼ e-mail; 0.67 ¼ form; 1 ¼ automatic system Ordinal

    ReservTime Reservation system response time Time, in hours, from reservation request to confirmation of availability Metric

    SalesPolicy Sales policies (canceling reservations, refunds, etc.) 0 ¼ no; 0.5 ¼ partly; 1 ¼ yes Ordinal

    Customer retention

    UserRegister User registration 0 ¼ absent; 0.5 ¼ basic data form; 1 ¼ profile data form Ordinal

    NewsLetter Newsletter 0 ¼ absent; 0.5 ¼ basic; 1 ¼ personalized Ordinal

    FidelityProgr Fidelity program 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    FAQ FAQ 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    ClientServTime Customer service response time Time, in hours, from inquiry to response Metric

    Privacy and securityPrivacyPolicy Privacy policy 0 ¼ absent; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    SecCrdtCardPg Secure credit card page   1 ¼ not secure; 0 ¼ not applicable; 1 ¼ secure Ordinal

    SecurityPolicy Security policy   1 ¼ not present; 0 ¼ not applicable; 1 ¼ present Ordinal

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516    509

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    7/13

    tools work and which do not. As a result, companies are

    able to change the way they do things and so improve their

    overall results. In order to measure website effectiveness, it

    is important to know what can be measured and how to

    measure it.

    For the purposes of this study, website effectiveness, in

    the context of marketing, was defined as the results thewebsite may bring to the company in terms of marketing.

    Chaffey et al. (2003) proposes some objective indicators for

    measuring website effectiveness, including sales, market

    share and customer retention. However, the adoption of 

    these indicators as objective measures would have imposed

    certain practical limitations to this research study, since

    practitioners would be concerned about leakage of 

    strategic information.   Venkatraman and Ramanujam

    (1987)   have proposed that there is convergence between

    economic measures of business performance and the

    perceptions of managers of that performance, so that the

    latter can be used to represent the former. This conver-

    gence was also corroborated by   Kohli et al. (1993)   and

    Perin and Sampaio (1999) —the latter study being carried

    out in Brazil. Despite the subjective character of these

    kinds of measures, the authors pointed out that there are

    advantages to using managers’ perceptions: increased

    number of responses, better understanding of what

    is being measured and less concern about strategic

    information outflow.

    Managers’ perceptions about their website’s effectiveness

    were therefore used in this study as performance indicators

    for those websites, based on their convergence with

    objective measures and the practical implications of that

    convergence. Therefore, e-mails were sent to hotel market-ing managers asking them four questions about hotel

    website effectiveness, requesting their perception of (1) new

    client acquisition, (2) market share, (3) sales volume and

    (4) customer retention. The answers to these questions

    comprised a 5-point Likert scale, defining the degree of 

    effect the website has on each item as: null, weak positive,

    reasonable positive, strong positive or extremely strong

    positive.

    5.3. Procedures for website evaluation and analysis

    The first step was to collect e-mail addresses using

    generic search engines, such as Google and Yahoo, as well

    as on specific tourist portals, such as Embratur for Brazil

    and Turespan ˜ a for Spain. An e-mail was then sent to each

    of 1800 hotels—715 hotels in South Brazil and 1085 in

    the Balearic Islands—and resent within a week to

    non-respondents. The only variable that significantly

    differentiated between the early respondents and the late

    respondents was room price ( p ¼ 0.049), suggesting

    that higher-priced hotels were more interested in the

    effectiveness of their websites.

    The majority of the e-mails sent were not answered

    (79.9%), undeliverable (9.1%) or sent to a hotel without a

    website that could be analyzed (1.2%).   Table 2   lists data

    collection process statistics. The final sample comprised

    167 (9.3%) websites, which were then evaluated using the

    instrument described earlier.

    Eighty-four percent of the hotels in the sample had 220

    beds or less, which characterizes small and medium size

    hotels. After data collection, a confirmatory factor analysis

    was performed, in order to evaluate the constructsdeveloped during the literature review and to assess

    convergent validity. Discriminant validity and reliability

    were also estimated (Garson, 2005;   Hair et al., 2005;

    Malhotra, 2001). The measurement model was then

    validated using structural equation modeling and finally

    its causal relationships were verified with the structural

    model.

    The use of structural equations demands care with

    certain issues, such as sample size, multivariate normality,

    outlier presence and the number of observed items per

    construct. There is no consensus among authors on

    indications of sample. Garson (2005) states that the median

    sample size in 72 SEM studies was 198.   Anderson and

    Gerbing (1988) accept sample sizes greater than 150.  Hair

    et al. (2005)   suggest that sample size depends on the

    number of estimated parameters: a minimum of 5 and a

    maximum of 10 cases per parameter.   MacCallum and

    Austin (2000)   warn that a given number established in

    order to test a model is not necessarily adequate for other

    purposes, and that general rules should not be generally

    accepted. Based on these indications, the sample size of the

    present study—167 cases—is considered acceptable. How-

    ever, it does not allow for the construction of comparative

    models of Brazil with Spain, and so the model presented in

    this study combines the two samples. Although they havesimilar Latin roots, it is possible that they would exhibit

    differences in terms of the business behaviors of marketing

    managers and in terms of characteristics embedded in their

    hotel websites.

    Some of the items on the instrument are measured on a

    dichotomous ordinal scale, reflecting characteristics that

    are either present or absent. Although structural equations

    can tolerate this type of scale, its use influences multivariate

    normality (Garson, 2005). This was calculated using

    Mardia’s coefficient, which, as was expected, indicated a

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Table 2Data collection process

    Process Brazil Spain Total

    n   %   n   %   n   %

    E-mails sent 715 100.0 1085 100.0 1800 100.0

    E-mails not delivered 73 10.2 91 8.4 164 9.1

    E-mails not answered 545 76.2 893 82.3 1438 79.9

    No website 10 1.4 11 1.0 21 1.2

    Invalid respondent 1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.1

    Respondent  46 months in hotel 4 0.6 3 0.3 7 0.4

    Website offline 0 0.0 2 0.2 2 0.1

    Websites evaluated 82 11.5 85 7.8 167 9.3

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516 510

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    8/13

    strong deviation from normality. As there were no relevant

    outliers in the sample, data transformations could not be

    processed and other estimation methods would have

    demanded much higher sample sizes and therefore careful

    selection of fit indexes was finally adopted as work-around

    method (Hair et al., 2005; Schumacker and Lomax, 1996).

    Fit indexes less sensitive to non-normal distribution wereselected to minimize this bias (Kline, 1998). The absolute fit

    indexes chosen were the ratio of chi-square to degrees of 

    freedom (w2/DF) and the root mean square error of 

    approximation (RMSEA). The incremental fit indexes

    employed were the Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), the

    Bentler–Bonett normed fit index (NFI) and the compara-

    tive fit index (CFI). Additionally, a parsimonious fit index

    was selected for future model comparison: the parsimony

    normed fit index (PNFI).

    Data screening was performed in order to identify lower

    item variance. Price segmentation and product configura-

    tion (PriceAccessID and ProductConfig) exhibited extre-

    mely low variance (0.006 and 0.018, respectively) indicating

    that these are not current practices among the hotel

    websites in this sample. Only one of the hotels practices

    price segmentation and three provide product configura-

    tion features on their website. These items were then

    excluded from the analysis.

    6. Results

    6.1. Validation of the measurement model 

    The first step in the validation process was to perform

    exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the website char-acteristics instrument with the number of factors fixed at

    six, to determine whether the items collected were in fact

    associated with the categories identified from the literature.

    The choice of six factors was determined from the number

    of constructs identified in the literature and the number of 

    factors suggested by screenplot analysis. The EFA method

    employed was principal axis factoring, as indicated for use

    with SEM (Garson, 2005). In view of the sample size, items

    with a factor loading of less than 0.45 in any factor were

    considered non-significant and were discarded (Hair et al.,

    2005). Explanatory factor analysis returned a KMO of 

    0.746 and a total explained variance of 60.394%, which

    were considered adequate.   Table 3   lists the EFA factor

    loadings, suggesting a different view from the literature in

    some dimensions, as will be described in detail next.

    Factor 1 grouped items that in the literature were

    associated with customer retention: fidelity program, user

    register, FAQ and newsletter. Additionally, privacy policy

    was included here, which makes sense, since, whenever

    users need to register on a website to participate in the

    fidelity program, a privacy policy is necessary to ensure

    that their private information is not misused by the hotel.

    The item privacy policy was also significantly associated

    with privacy and security, represented by factor 4. In the

    case of this factor, the items secure credit-card web page,

    security policy, sales policy and privacy policy all indicate

    a concern about information transparency between

    hotel and tourist, assuring hotel clients that they can

    trust the information provided by the website, and

    management that they can trust the information they are

    receiving.

    Promotion items all show significant loadings on factor2, with the exception of hotel services photo. As most

    hotels provided photos showing their properties and/or

    grounds, this item exhibited lower variance (0.04) than the

    other items in this construct (0.076–0.181). This suggests

    that the practice is common among hotels, but on the other

    hand, the item does not help explain promotion, due to its

    low variance.

    Navigability items are represented by factor 3. In this

    case, the item links home presented a factor loading of 

    0.397, approaching the 0.45 limit. This item was considered

    important to this construct’s meaning, and was kept in the

    instrument.

    Multimedia items were all represented in factor 5 with

    significant factor loadings.

    Items related to the response time of the reservation

    process and client service were loaded in factor 6. Although

    it is not found in the literature, this concept has been

    mentioned previously by   Cox and Dale (2002),   Harker

    (1999),   Peppers and Rogers Group (2000)   and   Buhalis

    (1998). Given the nature of these items, this new category

    was named ‘‘service promptness’’.

    Finally, the category reservation system was not

    identified by factor analysis. The item reservation system

    was not significantly loaded in any factor and was

    discarded. The other two items were divided into differentcategories from those described previously: sales policy was

    related to privacy and security, represented by factor 4, and

    reservation system time formed a new category with client

    service time, represented by factor 6.

    These factor loadings exhibited by the items, related to

    their respective factors, provided adequate convergence

    validity of the measurement instrument. A final EFA

    calculated without the discarded items returned a KMO of 

    0.709 and a total explained variance of 61.345%.

    Discriminant validity was measured by means of 

    correlation between constructs. This was calculated using

    the software program AMOS. The greatest correlation was

    between customer retention and privacy and security

    (0.712), as would be expected after the factor analysis,

    since privacy policy correlated significantly with both

    factors. Since there was no correlation greater than 0.85

    (Garson, 2005;   Kline, 1998), discriminant validity was

    confirmed.

    Compound reliability was measured for each construct,

    including website effectiveness, in order to verify multi-

    variate reliability. The lowest result was 0.668, attributed to

    service promptness. As all resultant values were over the

    suggested limit of 0.5 (Hair et al., 2005), the instrument was

    considered to have adequate reliability. The final constructs

    and items are listed in  Table 4.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516    511

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    9/13

    The measurement model was then subjected to structural

    equations modeling, using AMOS. No transgression

    estimates were observed, i.e., standardized regression

    weights greater than 1.0 or negative error variances (Hair

    et al., 2005). Fit indexes were then verified and their results

    are presented in Table 5.

    Comparing target values with calculated values, the

    model can be considered with adequate fit (Anderson and

    Gerbing, 1988; Garson, 2005; Hair et al., 2005).

    6.2. Analysis of the structural model 

    Once the measurement model had been validated, the

    structural model was then designed, as illustrated in  Fig. 1.

    The resulting standard regression weights, standard errors

    and significance levels are listed in   Table 6. According to

    these results, only promotion has a significant association

    with website effectiveness. The other categories—multimedia,

    navigability, customer retention, privacy and security and

    service promptness—are not associated with results perceived

    by hoteliers. This may indicate that the Internet is being

    employed as merely another form of mass media, like TV or

    radio, which is extensively criticized by Hoffman and Novak

    (1997) and others.

    Website characteristics involving multimedia may not be

    valued by customers, or their value may be overshadowed

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Table 4

    Final instrument items

    Category Items

    Promotion HservText Hotel services text

    RoomText Room text

    RoomPhoto Room photos

    RegionText Surroundings text

    RegionPhoto Surroundings photos

    Multimedia HservVideo Hotel services videos or 3D photos

    RoomVideo Room videos or 3D photos

    RegionVideo Surroundings videos or 3D photos

    Navigability StandDesign Standard page design

    StandMenu Standard menu structure

    MenuPosition Structure localization information

    LinksHome Home page links

    Customer retention UserRegister User registration

    NewsLetter Newsletter

    FidelityProgr Fidelity program

    FAQ FAQ

    PrivacyPolicy Privacy policy

    Privacy and security PrivacyPolicy Privacy policy

    SecCrdtCardPg Secure credit card page

    SecurityPolicy Security policy

    SalesPolicy Sales policies

    Service promptness ReservTime Reservation system response time

    ClientServTime Customer service response time

    Table 3

    Exploratory factor analysis

    Item Factor

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    FidelityProgr 0.758

    UserRegister 0.716FAQ 0.675

    PrivacyPolicy 0.664 0.501

    NewsLetter 0.486

    ReservSystem

    RoomText 0.722

    HServText 0.662

    RegionText 0.648

    RegionPhoto 0.646

    RoomPhoto 0.503

    HServPhoto

    StandMenu 0.884

    StandDesign 0.710

    MenuPosition 0.429

    LinksHome 0.397

    SecCrdtCardPg 0.442 0.730

    SecurityPolicy 0.599

    SalesPolicy 0.509

    HServVideo 0.824

    RoomVideo 0.823

    RegionVideo 0.480

    ReservTime 0.641

    ClientServTime 0.480

    Extraction method: principal axis factoring

    Rotation method: varimax

    Source: SPSS output.

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516 512

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    10/13

    by the time they take to download. The more multimedia

    content, more download time—and user patience—are

    needed.

    Despite exhibiting a moderate correlation with promo-

    tion (r ¼ 0.317;   p ¼ 0.00), navigability did not present an

    association with website effectiveness. This could be

    explained by the intensive use of navigability character-istics, making it a common practice among hotels.

    Websites containing features to support customer reten-

    tion also failed to demonstrate any relation to hoteliers’

    perceptions of effectiveness. A closer look indicated that,

    out of 27 hotel websites offering user registration, 15 did

    not publish a privacy policy. This lack of attention to users’

    concerns about private information may explain part of the

    absence of any customer retention impact on website

    effectiveness.

    Contrary to what is proposed by   Ranganathan and

    Ganapathy (2002) and others, privacy and security did notpresent an association with website effectiveness. This may

    corroborate the suggestion that the intended use of hotel

    websites is as promotional mass media, rather than

    exploiting its potential as a point-of-sale or customer

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Table 5

    Fit indexes for the measurement model

    Index type Index Target value Calculated value

    Absolute fit   w 2  – 492.508

    DF    – 278w2/DF   o5 1.772

    RMSEA   o0.8 0.068

    Incremental fit TLI   40.9 0.951

    NFI   40.9 0.917

    CFI   40.9 0.961

    Parsimonious fit PNFI – 0.726

    Fig. 1. Structural model.

    Table 6

    Standard regression weights

    Relationship Standard

    weights

    Standard

    error

     p

    Promotion   - Effectiveness 0.619 0.459 0.000

    Multimedia   - Effectiveness   0.046 0.317 0.576Navigability   - Effectiveness   0.090 0.325 0.353

    Customer

    retention

    - Effectiveness 0.019 1.086 0.892

    Privacy and

    security

    - Effectiveness 0.123 0.487 0.414

    Service

    promptness

    - Effectiveness   0.102 0.299 0.293

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516    513

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    11/13

    retention tool. As this potential is not being taking

    advantage of, privacy and security become less relevant.

    In fact, most of the hotels did not need a security policy

    (85%), but a little more than half (52%) of those that did

    need a policy did not have one.

    Service promptness was heavily influenced by the

    information technology responsible for room reservationsbehind the website. Automatic reservation systems pro-

    vided room availability confirmation almost instantly,

    while reservation forms linked to an e-mail-sending process

    took up to several days to be answered—when there

    actually was an answer. Overall, 18.6% of reservation

    requests were answered after more than one week or

    not answered at all. When non-working forms or wrong

    e-mails are included, this number rises to 28.8% of all the

    hotels investigated. Response times for client service were

    no different. Indeed, response times longer than one

    week—or non-existent responses—accounted for 28.7%

    of the sample. According to these results, a significant

    proportion of hotel websites are ‘‘inert’’, that is, they do

    not have the appropriate organizational support to

    respond to user-initiated contact through the Internet.

    The results presented here indicate very limited use of 

    websites by small and medium size hotels in the South

    region of Brazil and in the Balearic Islands, resembling

    mass-media marketing promotion. However, some reasons

    for this can be hypothesized.

    Most tourists do not make room reservations through

    the websites of small and medium size hotels. Hoteliers

    may think that, if this point-of-sale is not important, there

    is no reason to be effective in an organizational process

    that deals with small demands. If website reservationprocesses were really the main source of hotels’ revenues,

    they would certainly be more efficient. They would reply

    more promptly to reservation requests, in contrast with

    what was observed in this study.

    Major income may still be provided by traditional

    distribution channels. Tourist operators and travel agencies

    may have enough bargaining power to inhibit hotels’ direct

    contact with clients. Even if Internet transaction costs are

    lower, hotels may not be comfortable with offering lower

    prices than their intermediaries, possibly fearing commer-

    cial retaliation. Internet tourists value lower prices (Rach-

    man and Buchanan, 1999), so when they are evaluating

    available quotations, they may find local agent prices more

    attractive. Another reason tourists turn to traditional

    distribution channels may be associated with a sense of 

    security. Dealing with a local tourist agency is convenient

    when problems arise, rather then with a distant hotel,

    which, sometimes, a tourist will not know. The generally

    deficient security and privacy policies observed in the

    present study may compound this. Most hotel tourists may

    be still going to local travel agencies for commercial

    transactions.

    Since tourists perform most transactions with travel

    agencies, hotel websites may be used as a secondary source

    for hotel information, because they can provide more

    current, extensive and detailed information about hotel

    services, rooms and the tourist environment. This may

    corroborate the finding that promotion is the only

    characteristic associated with website effectiveness.

    7. Discussion

    The objective of this paper was to investigate the

    characteristics of hotel websites and their implications for

    website effectiveness. It was not the intention here to deal

    with the strategic relationship of hotels with their clients.

    As the results described above show, hoteliers should focus

    investment on promotion in order to enhance their

    websites’ effectiveness, a practice inherited from conven-

    tional mass media. Extensive informational texts and

    photos about hotel services, rooms and nearby attrac-

    tions seem to be associated with website effectiveness in

    terms of new client acquisition, market share, client

    retention and sales. However, it is possible to elaborate

    on certain considerations about the reasons why other

    website characteristics did not present associations with

    effectiveness.

    The results presented earlier suggest there is a circular

    effect between website characteristics and consumer

    demands. It seems that hotel websites respond inefficiently

    to consumer demands for commercial transactions, en-

    couraging consumers to use traditional tourist distributors.

    As a result, hotel revenues continue to originate from

    tourism operators and travel agencies, reducing hoteliers’

    interest in developing effective website reservation systems.

    Internet promotion exhibited a significant impact on

    perceived website effectiveness, probably because consu-mers use websites as a secondary source of information.

    If this is so, hoteliers should give some attention to

    certain issues. First, direct contact with consumers offers

    the possibility of turning distributors’ commissions into

    profits. This market opportunity is open and could be

    exploited through cooperative strategies to reduce distri-

    butor bargaining power. So, once the circular effect has

    been broken, the prospects for using the Internet as a

    marketing tool are optimistic, but the return on hotel

    website investments should be expected to be in the

    long run.

    Second, the reservation and client support systems on

    some hotel websites are not working properly and efforts

    must be employed to achieve reliability or this functionality

    should be excluded from these websites. Offering online

    room reservation and a client communication channel

    presume the responsibility of responding to these demands.

    By not doing so, hotels may not only lose clients that have

    shown an interest in them—after all, they have navigated

    to the website looking for information and placed a

    reservation or sent a question—they might also damage

    their market image over the long term.

    Third, companies that develop hotel websites, marketing

    consultants, specialized media and other institutional

    forces may put pressure on hoteliers to implement

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516 514

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    12/13

    advanced functionalities in their websites. However, if 

    promotion is the only dimension that influences website

    effectiveness, as demonstrated by our research, investments

    in other website dimensions should be carefully considered.

    In addition to practical implications for managers, some

    theoretical implications can also be indicated. The litera-

    ture review section analyzed website evaluation methodsand those based on evaluation by phases and by

    characteristics proved simple to use, but lacked the

    relevancy needed by practitioners. On the other hand,

    evaluation methods that consider website effectiveness

    lacked consistent validation methods. For example, only

    Ranganathan and Ganapathy (2002)   used multivariate

    statistics as an approach to model construction. The

    present study included measurement of website effective-

    ness in order to improve the relevancy of website

    evaluation. Since this was done using consistent validation

    procedures, it may be of use as a foundation to future

    research on tourist distribution strategies using the Inter-

    net. Alternatively, further studies on website evaluation

    could propose new measurement instruments and use the

    theoretical framework proposed here for comparison. In

    this way instruments could be refined and be used to assist

    practitioners when investing in this new marketing media.

    References

    Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modeling in

    practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological

    Bulletin 103 (3), 411–423.

    Bell, H., Tang, N.K.H., 1998. The effectiveness of commercial internet

    web sites: a user’s perspective. Internet Research: Electronic Network-ing Applications and Policy 8 (2), 219–228.

    Buhalis, D., 1998. Strategic use of information technologies in the tourism

    industry. Tourism Management 19 (5), 409–421.

    Burgess, L., Cooper, J., 1999. A model of internet commerce adoption

    (MICA). Paper presented at the 12th International Bled Electronic

    Commerce Conference.

    Burgess, L., Cooper, J., 2000. Extending the viability of MICA (model of 

    internet commerce adoption) as a metric for explaining the process of 

    business adoption of internet commerce. Paper presented at the

    ICTEC3.

    Burgess, L., Cooper, J., Alcock, C., 2001. The adoption of the web as a

    marketing tool by regional tourism associations (RTAS) in Australia.

    Paper presented at the 12th Australasian Conference on Information

    Systems.

    Chaffey, D., Mayer, R., Johnston, K., Ellis-Chadwick, F., 2003. InternetMarketing, second ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Constantinides, E., 2002. The 4s web-marketing mix model. Electronic

    Commerce Research and Applications 1, 57–76.

    Cox, J., Dale, B.G., 2002. Key quality factors in web site design and use:

    an examination. International Journal of Quality and Reliability

    Management 19 (7), 862–888.

    Deighton, J., 1996. The future of interactive marketing. Harvard Business

    Review.

    Doolin, B., Burgess, L., Cooper, J., 2002. Evaluating the use of the

    web for tourism marketing: a case study of New Zealand. Tourism

    Management 23 (5), 557–561.

    EMBRATUR, 2004. Anua ´ rio estatı ´stico 2003.

    Garson, D., 2005. Pa 765 statnotes: an online textbook.

    Ghosh, S., 1998. Making business sense of the internet. Harvard Business

    Review.

    Gilbert, D.C., Powell-Perry, J., Widijoso, S., 1999. Approaches by hotels

    to the use of the internet as a relationship marketing tool. Journal of 

    Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science 5 (1), 21–38.

    Gro ¨ nroos, C., 1995. Marketing: Gerenciamento e Servic-os. Ed. Campos,

    Rio de Janeiro.

    Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 2005. Análise

    Multivariada de Dados, fifth ed. Bookman, Porto Alegre.

    Harker, M.J., 1999. Relationship marketing defined? An examination of current relationship marketing definitions. Marketing Intelligence and

    Planning 17 (1), 13–20.

    Ho, J.K., 1997. Evaluating the world wide web: a global study of 

    commercial sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3 (1).

    Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., 1997. A new marketing paradigm for

    electronic commerce. The Information Society 13, 43–54.

    Huizingh, E.K.R.E., 2000. The content and design of web sites: an

    empirical study. Information and Management 37 (3), 123–134.

    Instituto de Estudios Turı ´sticos, 2004. Encuesta de ocupacio ´ n hotelera.

    Retrieved on 12 April 2004 from  /http://www.iet.tourspain.esS.

    Instituto Nacional De Estadı ´stica, 2003. Espan ˜ a en cifras 2002-cuentas

    nacionales.

    International Telecommunication Union, 2003. Itu digital access index:

    world’s first global ICT ranking education and affordability key to

    boosting new technology adoption. Retrieved on 16 January 2004 from/http://www.itu.int/newsarchive/press_releases/2003/30.htmlS.

    Kline, R.B., 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation

    Modeling. Guilford Press, New York.

    Kohli, A.K., Jaworski, B.J., Kumar, A., 1993. Markor: a measure of 

    market orientation. Journal of Marketing XXX, 467–477.

    Kotler, P., 1998. Administrac-a ˜o de Marketing, fifth ed. Atlas, Sa ˜o Paulo.

    MacCallum, R.C., Austin, J.T., 2000. Applications of structural equation

    modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology 51,

    201–226.

    Malhotra, N.K., 2001. Pesquisa de Marketing, third ed. Bookman, Porto

    Alegre.

    McCarthy, E.J., 1976. Marketing Ba ´ sico-uma Visa ˜o Gerencial, second ed.

    Zahar Editores, Rio de Janeiro.

    Mummalaneni, V., 2005. An empirical investigation of web site

    characteristics, consumer emotional states and on-line shoppingbehaviors. Journal of Business Research 58 (4), 397–551.

    Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., Despontin, M., 2004. The conceptualization

    and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information and

    Management 41 (5), 543–560.

    Palmer, A., McCole, P., 2000. The role of electronic commerce in

    creating virtual tourism destination marketing organizations. Interna-

    tional Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 12 (3),

    198–294.

    Peppers, D., Rogers, M., 2000. The physical-virtual future. Intelligent

    Enterprise.

    Peppers and Rogers Group, 2000. CRM series-marketing 1 to 1: Peppers

    and Rogers Group.

    Perin, M.G., Sampaio, C.H., 1999. Performance empresarial: uma

    comparac-a ˜o entre indicadores subjetivos e objetivos. In: ENANPAD,

    23, 1999, Foz do Iguac-u (PR). Anais. Anpad, Foz do Iguac-u.Piccoli, G., Spalding, B.R., Ives, B., 2002. The customer-service life cycle:

    a framework for improving customer service through information

    technology. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration

    Quarterly 42 (3).

    Pitt, L.R., Berthon, P., Berthon, J.-P., 1999. Changing channels: the

    impact of the internet on distribution strategy. Business Horizons.

    Porter, M.E., 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing

    Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York.

    Quelch, J.A., Klein, L.R., 1996. The internet and international marketing.

    Sloan Management Review 37 (3), 60–75.

    Rachman, Z.M., Buchanan, J., 1999. Effective tourism web sites, part 2:

    expectation versus delivery of tourism web sites. University of 

    Waikato.

    Ranganathan, C., Ganapathy, S., 2002. Key dimensions of business-to-

    consumer web sites. Information and Management 36 (6), 457–465.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516    515

    http://www.iet.tourspain.es/http://www.itu.int/newsarchive/press_releases/2003/30.htmlhttp://www.itu.int/newsarchive/press_releases/2003/30.htmlhttp://www.iet.tourspain.es/

  • 8/18/2019 1-s2.0-S0278431907000722-main

    13/13

    Rocha, S.B., 2003. Estrate ´ gia on-line: Uma Ana ´ lise dos WebSites na

    Indústria Hoteleira do Municı ´pio do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

    Observato ´ rio EMBRATUR-FGV.

    Rosen, D.E., Purinton, E., 2004. Website design: viewing the web as a

    cognitive landscape. Journal of Business Research 57 (7), 787–794.

    Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G., 1996. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural

    Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erbaum, New Jersey.

    Teo, T.S.H., Pian, Y., 2003. A model for web adoption. Information andManagement 41 (4), 457–468.

    Venkatraman, N., Ramanujam, V., 1987. Measurement of business

    economic performance: an examination of method convergence.

    Journal of Management 13 (1), 109–122.

    Wan, C.-S., 2002. The web sites of international tourist hotels and tour

    wholesalers in Taiwan. Tourism Management 23 (2), 155–160.

    World Tourism Organization, 2003. Tourism highlights 2003. Retrieved

    on 26 June 2003 from  /http://www.world-tourism.orgS.

    Yelkur, R., Dacosta, M.M.N., 2001. Differential pricing and segmentationon the internet: the case of hotels. Management Decision 39 (4), 252–262.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    S. Schmidt et al. / International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (2008) 504–516 516

    http://www.world-tourism.org/http://www.world-tourism.org/