6
7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 1/6 Bioresource Technology 40 (1992) 43-48 :' ~' ~~i naerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Processing Wastes for Biogas Production Prema Viswanath, S. Sumithra Devi Krishna Nand* Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-570 013, India (Received 1 October 1990; revised version received 15 February 1991; accepted 22 February 1991 ) bstract The effect of feeding different fruit and vegetable wastes, mango, pineapple, tomato, jackfruit, banana and orange, was studied in a 60-liter digester by cycling each waste every fifth day in order to operate the digester as and when there was supply of eed. The characteristics of the anaerobic- ally digested fluid and digester performance in terms of biogas production were determined at dif- ferent loading rates (LR) and at different hydraulic retention times (HRT), and the maximum biogas yield of 06 rrd/kg VS added was achieved at a 20- day HR T and 40 kg TS m- 3day- 1 loading rate. The hourly gas production was observed in the digesters operated at 16 and 24 days HRT. The major yield (74 5%) of gas was produced within 12 h of feeding at a 16-day HRT whereas at a 24-day HRT only 59~93% of the total gas could be obtained at this time. Key words: Anaerobic digestion, waste utilization, fruit and vegetable wastes, biogas. INTRODUCTION Over 60 x 1 6 t of fruits and vegetables are pro- duced annually in India, of which only 1 is pro- cessed in the fruit and vegetable processing industries (Krishna Nand & Manjrekar, 1988). The solid wastes normally account for 40-50 of the raw material processed and has a total solid concentration of 10-15 . Disposal of these quan- tifies of wet, putrescible organic refuse presents formidable environmental and economic problems. Since a substantial quantity of energy is used for various processing steps, it becomes per- *To whom correspondence should be addressed. 43 tinent to convert these wastes into biogas, which could supply much of the energy needed for in- plant operations. There have been a number of reports on the utilization of fruit and vegetable processing wastes (Knol etal., 1978; Lane, 1984; Sumithra Devi and Krishna Nand, 1989; DNES Report, 1990) indi- vidually as a feedstock for biogas production. However, there are no reports on the simul- taneous use of various fruit wastes as feedstock in a single digester. Most fruits and vegetables are processed on a seasonal basis, only for a period of 2-3 months, and the wastes that emanate during these processes vary considerably in their physico-chemical characteristics. Some of them are rich in toxic constituents such as limonin in citrus wastes and most of them are deficient in nitrogen (such as mango and pineapple processing wastes). Since the overall potential for energy pro- duction through anaerobic digestion from these wastes is large, it becomes necessary to operate the digesters throughout the year with any of the wastes available. In this paper observations made on the use of various fruit wastes in succession or mixed as feedstock for biogas production are pre- sented. METHO S Substrates The mango, orange, pineapple and tomato pro- cessing wastes were collected from fruit process- ing factories (Kissan Products Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka; Clean Foods, Madanpalle, Andhra Pradesh; Globe Foods, Mysore, Karnataka and Mysore Fruitin, Mysore, Karnataka). Jackfniit and banana wastes were obtained from restaur- ants and hotels located in Mysore City. The sam-

1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 1/6

Bioresource Technology 40 (1992) 43-48

: ' ~ ' ~ ~ i

na ero b ic D ig es t io n o f Fru it a nd Veg eta b le

Pro cess ing W a stes fo r B io g a s P ro duct io n

P r e m a V i s w a n a t h , S . S u m i t h r a D e v i K r i s h n a N a n d *

Central Food Technological Resea rch Insti tute, Myso re-570 013, Ind ia

(Received 1 Octob er 1990; revised version received 15 February 1991; accepted 22 Februa ry 1991 )

b s t r a c t

T he e f fec t o f f eed in g d i f f e ren t f r u i t a nd vege tab le

w as te s , ma ngo , p ineapp le , t oma to , jack f r u i t,

banana an d o r ange , w as s tud ied in a 60 - l i te r

d iges te r by cyc l ing each w as te ever y f i f t h d ay in

or der to oper a te the d iges te r a s and w hen ther e w as

s upp ly o f eed . T he char ac te r is t ic s o f the anaer ob ic -

a l ly d i g e st e d f l u i d a n d d i g es t er p e r f o r m a n c e i n

t e r m s o f b io g a s p r o d u c t i o n w e r e d e t e r m i n e d a t d if -

f e r en t load ing r a te s (L R) and a t d i f f e r en t hydr au l i c

r e t e n t i o n t i m e s ( H R T ) , a n d t h e m a x i m u m b i o g a s

y i e l d o f 0 6 r r d /k g V S a d d e d w a s a c h ie v e d a t a 2 0 -

d a y H R T a n d 4 0 k g T S m - 3 d a y - 1 l o a d in g r a te . T h e

hour ly gas p r od uc t io n w as obs er ve d in the d iges te r s

o p e ra t ed a t 1 6 a n d 2 4 d a y s H R T . T h e m a j o r y i e ld

(7 4 5 % ) o f g as w a s p r o d u c e d w i t h i n 1 2 h o f f e e d i n g

a t a 1 6 -d a y H R T w h e r e as a t a 24 - d a y H R T o n l y

59~ 93% o f the to ta l gas cou ld be ob ta ined a t th i s

t ime.

K e y w o r d s: A n a e r o b i c d i g e s t io n , w a s t e u t i li z a t io n ,

f ru i t and vege tab le was tes , b iogas .

I N T R O D U C T I O N

O v e r 6 0 x 1 6 t o f f ru i t s and vege tab les a re p ro-

d u c e d a n n u a l l y i n I n d i a , o f w h i c h o n l y 1 i s p r o -

c e s s e d i n t h e f r u i t a n d v e g e t a b l e p r o c e s s i n g

i n d u s t r i e s ( K r i s h n a N a n d & M a n j r e k a r , 1 9 8 8 ) .

T h e s o li d w a s t e s n o r m a l l y a c c o u n t f o r 4 0 - 5 0 o f

t h e r a w m a t e r i a l p r o c e s s e d a n d h a s a t o t a l s o l i d

c o n c e n t r a t io n o f 1 0 - 1 5 . D i s p o s a l o f t h e s e q u a n -

t i f i es o f wet , pu t r esc ib le o rgan ic r e fuse p resen t s

f o r m i d a b l e e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d e c o n o m i c

p r o b l e m s . S i n c e a s u b s t a n t i a l q u a n t i t y o f e n e r g y i s

u s e d f o r v a r i o u s p r o c e s s i n g s t e p s, i t b e c o m e s p e r -

*To whom correspond ence should be addressed.

43

t i n e n t t o c o n v e r t t h e s e w a s t e s i n t o b i o g a s , w h i c h

c o u l d s u p p l y m u c h o f t h e e n e r g y n e e d e d f o r i n -

p l a n t o p e r a t i o n s .

T h e r e h a v e b e e n a n u m b e r o f r e p o r t s o n t h e

u t i l iz a t i o n o f fr u i t a n d v e g e t a b l e p r o c e s s i n g w a s t e s

( K n o l e ta l . , 1 9 7 8 ; L a n e , 1 9 8 4 ; S u m i t h r a D e v i a n d

K r i s h n a N a n d , 1 9 8 9 ; D N E S R e p o r t , 1 9 9 0 ) i n d i-

v i d u a l l y a s a f e e d s t o c k f o r b i o g a s p r o d u c t i o n .

H o w e v e r , t h e r e a r e n o r e p o r t s o n t h e s i m u l -

t a n e o u s u s e o f v a r i o u s f r u it w a s t e s a s f e e d s t o c k i n

a s ing le d iges te r . Mos t f ru i t s and vege tab les a re

p r o c e s s e d o n a s e a s o n a l b a s is , o n l y f o r a p e r i o d o f

2 - 3 m o n t h s , a n d t h e w a s t e s t h a t e m a n a t e d u r i n g

t h e s e p r o c e s s e s v a r y c o n s i d e r a b l y i n t h e i r

p h y s i c o - c h e m i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . S o m e o f t h e m

a r e r i c h i n t o x i c c o n s t i t u e n t s s u c h a s l i m o n i n i n

c i t r u s w a s t e s a n d m o s t o f t h e m a r e d e f i c i e n t i n

n i t ro g e n ( s u ch a s m a n g o a n d p i n e a p p l e p r o c e s si n g

w a s te s ). S i n c e t h e o v e r a l l p o t e n t i a l f o r e n e r g y p r o -

d u c t i o n t h r o u g h a n a e r o b i c d i g e s t i o n f r o m t h e s e

w a s t e s i s l a r g e , i t b e c o m e s n e c e s s a r y t o o p e r a t e

t h e d i g e s t e r s t h r o u g h o u t t h e y e a r w i t h a n y o f t h e

w a s t e s a v a il a b le . I n t h i s p a p e r o b s e r v a t i o n s m a d e

o n t h e u s e o f v a r io u s f r u i t w a s t e s i n s u c c e s s i o n o r

m i x e d a s f e e d s t o c k f o r b i o g a s p r o d u c t i o n a r e p r e -

sen ted .

M E T H O S

Substrates

T h e m a n g o , o r a n g e , p i n e a p p l e a n d t o m a t o p r o -

c e s s i n g w a s t e s w e r e c o l l e c t e d f r o m f r u i t p r o c e s s -

i n g f a c t o r i e s ( K i s s a n P r o d u c t s L t d , B a n g a l o r e ,

K a r n a t a k a ; C l e a n F o o d s , M a d a n p a l l e , A n d h r a

P r a d e s h ; G l o b e F o o d s , M y s o r e , K a r n a t a k a a n d

M y s o r e F r u i t i n , M y s o r e , K a r n a t a k a ) . J a c k f n i i t

a n d b a n a n a w a s t e s w e r e o b t a i n e d f r o m r e s t a u r -

a n t s a n d h o t e ls l o c a t e d i n M y s o r e C i ty . T h e s a m -

Page 2: 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 2/6

4 4

P. V '~wanath, S . S . Devi , K. Nand

p le s w e re su n -d r i e d , g ro u n d a n d s to r e d a t 1 2 ° (2

a n d u se d th ro u g h o u t t h e se s tu d ie s.

D i g e s t e r s

Plas t ic d rums of 60 l i te r capac i ty , ava i lab le

loca l ly , were c onv er ted in to d iges te rs w i th in le t

a n d o u t l e t p o r t s fo r f e e d in g a n d e f f lu e n t d i s c h a rg e

a long wi th a gas ou t le t . The d iges te rs , w i th a

w o rk in g v o lu m e o f 4 5 l i te r , w e re o p e ra t e d u n d e r

th e s e m i -c o n t in u o u s m o d e o f f e e d in g a t a t e m -

p e ra tu re o f 3 0 + 2 C .

M E T H O D S

S t a r t u p p r o c e d u r e a n d i n o c u l u m

C o w d u n g d i lu t e d in t h e r a t i o o f 4 :5 w i th w a te r

w a s c h a rg e d in t h e d ig e s t e r a lo n g w i th 1 0 % o f

s t a r t e r c u l tu r e o b ta in e d f ro m th e b io g a s d ig e s t e r

(5 m 3) o f t h e E x p e r im e n ta l A n im a l P ro d u c t io n

C e n te r F a c i l i t y o f C F T R I , My so re (P re m a

V isw a n a th & K r i sh n a N a n d , 1 9 8 9 ) . I n i t i a l l y

s t a b il i z a tio n o f t h e d ig e s te r s w a s c a rd e d o u t fo r

4 - 6 w e e k s a n d t h e n t h e y w e r e o p e r a t e d o n

v a r io u s fru i t w a s t e s a d d e d in su c c e s s io n a t a c o n -

s t a n t l o a d in g r a te o f 4 0 k g T S m -3 d a y -1 a n d 2 5

Table 1.

Periods Feedstock (wastes) used fo r

(25 days each) 5 days each in succession

Tom a to , ba na na , j a c k f ru it , o ra nge

pe e l w i th o i l , p ine a pp le

Tom a to , j a c ld ru i t , ma ngo , p ine a pp le ,

d e o i l e d o r a n g e

Pinea pple , m ango , jackf i 'u i t ,

p i n e a p p le , t o m a t o

B a na na , de o i l e d o ra nge , j a c k fru i t ,

p ine a pp le , ma ngo

Tom a to , o ra nge pe e l w i th o i l,

j a c ld ru i t, ba na na

d a ys H R T u n d e r t h e s e m i -c o n ti n u ou s m o d e ,

r e m o v in g a n d r e p l a c in g 1 . 8 l i t e r s o f s lu r ry a t a

d e f in i t e t im e o n c e a d a y . T h e p a t t e rn o f f e e d in g

was as in Table 1 .

In o rd e r t o s im u la t e n a tu ra l c o n d i t i o n s fo r a

m ix e d - f e e d s to c k a n a e ro b ic d ig e s t io n p ro c e s s , n o

re g u la r s e q u e n c e o f f e e d in g p a t t e r n w a s fo l lo w e d .

F iv e d ig e s t e rs w e re u se d in t h e se e x p e r im e n t s .

A n a ly t i c a l

m e t h o d s

D a i ly g a s p ro d u c t io n w a s r e c o rd e d b y d i s c h a rg in g

th ro u g h a g a s - f lo w m e te r (T o sh n iw a l , B a n g a lo re ,

In d ia) . G a s a n a ly s is w a s d o n e u s in g a N e te l G a s

A n a l y s e r w i th P o r a p a k Q a n d m o l e c u l a r si e ve

c o l u m n s w i th a T C D d e t e c t o r ( P r em a V i s w a n a t h

& K r i sh n a N a n d , 1 9 8 9 ) . T o ta l a n d v o la t i l e so l id s ,

f a t , a sh , t o t a l n i t ro g e n a n d p h o sp h o ru s w e re

d e t e r m i n e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e m e t h o d s o f A O A C

(1 9 7 5) . T o ta l c a rb o n w a s a n a ly se d u s in g a C a r lo

E r b a 1 1 0 6 E l e m e n t a l A n a l ys e r . C h a r a c t er i st i c s

p e r io d ic a l ly e x a m in e d to e v a lu a t e t h e d ig e s t e rs

w e re p H , t o t a l so l id s (T S ) , t o t a l v o l a t i l e so l id s

(VS) , a lka l in i ty as C aC O 3, to ta l v o la t i le fa t ty ac ids

a s a c e t a t e , a n d N H 3 -N u s in g s t a n d a rd m e th o d s o f

t h e A m e r i c a n P u b l i c H e a l t h A s s o c i a t i o n ( 19 7 5 ).

G a s a n a ly s is w a s c a r d e d o u t f o u r t i m e s i n e a c h

r u n o f a r e t e n t i o n p e r i o d w h i l e t h e e f f l u en t

c h a ra c t e r is t i c s w e re d e t e rm in e d tw ic e d u r in g e a c h

r u n .

R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N

T h e p r o x i m a t e c o m p o s i t i o n o f r e p r e s e n t a t i v e

samples o f d i f fe ren t was tes i s l i s ted in Table 2 .

T h e t o ta l c a rb o n c o n t e n t a p p r o a c h e d a l m o s t 4 0 %

a n d a b o v e , w h e re a s g re a t v a r i a b i l it y i n t h e

n i t ro g e n w a s o b se rv e d w h ic h r e su l t e d in a v a r i e d

c a rb o n to n i t ro g e n r a t i o o f 7 6 5 t o 2 1 . 3 2 in t h e

Table 2 . P rox ima te c ompo s i t i on o f f ru i t w a s t e s

Constituents Tomato Mango Orange Deoiled Pineapple Banana Jackfruit

( ) orang e

Mo is tu re a 70 .5 73 .6 73 .4 75 .14 87 .69 88 .14 80 .15

Tota l sof ids° 29 .5 26.4 26.6 24.86 12.31 11.86 19-85

Vola t i le so l ids b 95.73 96.4 94.2 93 61 93.7 9 95-07 92.27

As h b 4 .3 3 .6 5 .8 6-39 6 .2 4 .9 7 .7

Tota l carb on b 54-9 39.8 42.5 43.1 38 9 40-5 46-3

To ta l n i t roge nb 4.2 0.5 1.0 1.3 0.9 1-9 1-4

Phos phoru s b 0 .22 0 .56 0 00 0 .02 0 08 0 09 0 -09

C /N ra t io 13 -0 76 -5 40 .5 33 .2 42 .3 21 .3 33 .1

°On w et weight basis .

b n

dry w eight basis .

Averag es of t r ip l ica te ana lyses.

Page 3: 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 3/6

Digest ion o f ru i t and vegetable was tes 5

d e c re a s in g o rd e r : m a n g o , p in e a p p le , o r a n g e ,

d e o i l e d o ra n g e , j a c k f ru i t , t o m a to a n d b a n a n a p ro -

c e s sin g w a s te s . C / N r a t io s b e tw e e n 2 0 a n d 3 0 a r e

o p t i m u m f o r m a x i m u m b i o g a s g e n e r a t i o n

(S a n d e r s & B lo o d g o o d , 1 9 6 5 ) a n d g e n e ra t io n

fa i l e d a t 5 2 a n d a b o v e w i th p a p e r p u lp a n d

se w a g e m ix tu re s . A d ju s tm e n t o f r a t i o s w i th sy n -

th e t i c f e r ti l iz e r s su c h a s u r e a a n d a m m o n iu m su l-

p h a t e i s u n e c o n o m i c a l ( D N E S R e p o r t , 1 9 8 9) , b u t

t h e f o r m u l a t i o n o f f e e d w i t h c o m p l e m e n t a r y

w a s te s i s a n e f f e c t iv e m e th o d o f o v e rc o m in g th e se

p ro b le m s .

T h e o b se rv a t io n s r e c o rd e d d u r in g th e s t a r t -u p

s tu d ie s a r e p r e se n te d in F ig . 1 . A n in i ti a l d ro p in

p H f ro m 7 -0 to 6 . 7 w a s o b se rv e d b y th e e n d o f 5

d a y s o f t h e s tu d y, b u t t h i s g r a d u a l ly ro se t o 7 . 0 b y

th e 3 5 th d a y . B io g a s a n d m e th a n e y i e ld s v a r i e d

f rom 0 6 to 1 0

m 3

and 0 35 to 0 6

m 3

p e r k g o f

vo la t i le so l ids added respec t ive ly dur ing the f i r s t

t h r e e ru n s . D u r in g th i s p e r io d o f d r a s t ic v a r i a t i o n

in t h e b io g a s /m e th a n e y i e ld t h e re w a s , h o w e v e r ,

n e g l ig ib l e v a r i a t i o n in t h e p H . M o re o v e r , t h e c o n -

c e n t r a t i o n o f V F A (as a c e t a t e ) a n d th e a lk a l in ity

( as C a C O 3 ) d e t e rm in e d in t h e e f f lu e n t w e re o n a n

a v e ra g e 3 1 0 a n d 1 2 2 0 m g / l i t e r r e spe c t iv e ly , i n d i -

c a t in g s t a b l e a n a e ro b ic d ig e s t io n c o n d i t i o n s . A f t e r

a p e r io d o f 8 5 d a y s , t h e re w a s l i tt l e v a r i a t i o n in

th e b io g a s a n d m e th a n e y i e ld s a l t h o u g h th e f e e d -

s to c k u se d w a s c h a n g e d o n c e in 5 d a y s . A n

a v e ra g e y i e ld o f b io g a s a n d m e th a n e o f 0 -9 2 a n d

0 5 5 m 3 p e r k g V S a d d e d w a s o b ta in e d r e sp e c t -

ive ly . In a s epara te s tudy , i t has be en fo und tha t i f

so m e o f t h e se w a s t e s w e re u se d in d iv id u a l ly a s

f e e d s to c k fo r b io g a s p ro d u c t io n , t h e re w a s so u r -

in g o f t h e d ig e s t e r s l e a d in g to d ig e s t io n f a i l u r e

w h e n l o a d e d a t 4 0 k g T S m 3day i a t a H R T o f

2 5 d a y s (D N E S R e p o r t , 1 9 9 0 ) .

F o r d ig e s te r s d e s ig n e d w i th p o l lu t io n c o n t ro l a s

t h e m a i n o b j e c t iv e , t h e o p t i m u m r e t e n t i o n p e r io d

c a n b e c o n s i d e r e d a s t h e m i n i m u m h y d r a u l i c

r e t e n t io n t im e th a t c a n b e to l e r a t e d b e fo re i n s t a -

b i l i t y o f t h e d ig e s t e r o c c u r s (H o r to n , 1 9 8 0 ) . I n

a d d i t i o n th e h ig h e r t h e l o a d in g r a t e a t w h ic h th e

d ig e s t e r c a n b e o p e ra t e d , t h e g re a t e r i s it s r o l e in

p o l lu t io n a b a t e m e n t . H e n c e , tw o e x p e r im e n t s

w e re c a r r i e d o u t o n e a f t e r a n o th e r t o o p t im iz e

t h e s e t w o i m p o r t a n t o p e r a t i o n a l p a r a m e t e r s .

S t a b i l i z e d d ig e s t e r s w e re o p e ra t e d a t r e t e n t io n

t imes of 8 , 12 , 16 , 20 and 24 days a t a cons tan t

l o a d i n g r a t e o f 4 0 k g T S m - 3 d a y - 1 . T h e p a t t e r n

o f f e e d in g fo l lo w e d w a s a s d e sc r ib e d in M e th o d s .

T h e r e su l t s a r e p r e se n te d in T a b le 3 . D ig e s t e r s

o p e r a t i n g a t 1 6 , 2 0 a n d 2 4 d a y s H R T w e r e f o u n d

to b e s t a bl e . T h e re w a s a p e r f e c t l i n k in g o f t h e

a c i d o g en i c a n d m e t h a n o g e n i c p h a s e s i nc e t h e p H

re m a in e d a t 7 -0 a n d s in c e th e re w a s n o d ra s t i c

in c re a se i n a c id i ty o r a lk a lin i ty . H o w e v e r , t h e

d ig e s t e r s o p e ra t in g a t 8 a n d 1 2 d a y s H R T w e n t

so u r b y th e e n d o f o n e ru n . I n s ta b i l i ty o f t h e

d ig e s t e r s w a s d i r e c t ly r e l a t e d to t h e d ro p in p H ,

8 0

6 .0

: o 6 1 _ A

I

I Z

. 0 -8

• o

°~ ~

~. m 0 4,

I I i t

I I I I

1 2 3 4

P e r i o d s ( 2 5 d o y s e o c h )

F i g

1 . S t a x t -u p s tu d i e s o f b i o g a s p r o d u c t i o n f r o m a m i x e d f e e d s t o c k o f v a r i o u s f r u it s a n d v e g e t a b l e s . F o r f e e d m i x t u r e s s e e

M e t h o d s .

Page 4: 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 4/6

4 6 P. V iswanath S . S . Dev i K. N an d

increase in to ta l vo la t i le fa t ty ac ids , to ta l a lka l in i ty

a n d t o t a l a m m o n i a c o n c e n t r a t i o n as o b s e r v e d b y

o th e r w o rk e r s B ry a n t e t a L 1 9 7 7 ; H o b so n , 1 9 8 1 ;

R a n a d e e t a l . 1989; Sa les e t a l . 1989) . In the

s e c o n d e x p e r i m e n t f o u r d i g e s t e r s w e r e o p e r a t e d

a t a 1 6 d a y H R T w i th a l o a d in g r a t e o f 4 0 k g T S

m - 3 d a y -~. A f t e r t h e se r e a c h e d s t e a d y s t a te , t h e

lo a d in g r a te s o f t h r e e o f t h e m w e re r a i s e d to 6 0 ,

8 0 a n d 1 0 0 k g T S m - 3 d a y -1 . A s h a s b e e n

o b se rv e d b y o th e r w o rk e r s H a w k e s , 1 9 8 0 ;

H o r to n , 1 9 8 0 ; P y le , 1 9 8 0 ) t h e re w a s a d e f in i t e

r e l a t i o n sh ip b e tw e e n th e g a s y i e ld a n d lo a d in g

ra te Table 4 ). On ly d iges te rs ope ra t in g a t a load-

i ng r at e o f 4 0 k g T S m - a d a y - ~ w e r e f o u n d t o b e

s tab le . Sour in g of the d iges te rs op era t in g a t 60 , 80

a n d 1 0 0 k g T S m - 3 d a y -~ w a s o b s e r v e d b y t h e

e n d o f o n e ru n .

In a n o th e r s e t o f s tu d ie s , th e h o u r ly g as p ro d u c -

t i o n in d ig e s t e rs o p e ra t in g a t 1 6 , 2 0 a n d 2 4 d a y

H R T , a t a c o n s t a n t l o a d in g r a t e o f 4 0 k g T S

m aday 1

w a s r e c o rd e d a n d i s d e p ic t e d in F ig . 2 .

I t w a s o b se rv e d th a t t h e re w a s n o u n i fo rm i ty i n

able 3 . Ef fe c t o f va ry ing the H R T

A . O pe ra t iona l pa ra me te r s

H R T ( d ay s ) 8

TS in f e e d s lu r ry (%) 4

V S in f e e d s lu r ry (%) 94 + 3

V S loa d ing ra t e 38

(kg m-3d a y - I )

B . G a s p r o d u c t i o n

D a i ly ga s p rod uc t ion ( l it e rs ) 27 .5

G a s p rodu c t ion r a t e (vo l /vo l /da y ) 0 -62

G a s y i e ld (m3/kg V S a dde d ) 0 .13

G a s y i e ld (m3/kg TS a dde d ) 0 .13

M e tha ne (%) 22 .0

Spe c i f ic me tha n e p rodu c t ion 0 -03

(m3/kg VS added )

C. Eff luent charac te r is t ics

Tota l a lka l in i ty (mg/ l i te r as Ca CO 3) 811 6

N H 3-N (mg / l it e r ) 580

Tota l v ola t i le fa t ty ac ids

as ace ta te ( rag/ l i te r) 64 30

pH 4 -6

12 16 20 24

4 4 4 4

9 4 + 3 9 4 + 3 9 4 + 3 9 4 + 3

38 38 38 38

28 5 49-0 53-5 37 0

0 63 1-09 1 2 0.82

0 20 0-49 0 63 0 .52

0 19 0-44 0 60 0-50

47-2 51.1 58-4 61.2

0 .09 0 .25 0 -37 0 .32

4 1 1 2 1 6 8 2 2 0 1 8 1 4 5 1

2 4 0 9 8 8 5 1 4 6

2 3 1 0 6 1 0 3 2 2 3 4 1

6.1 7.1 7.0 7 1

a V alue s obse rve d ju s t be fo re t he d ige s t e r w e n t sou r .

able 4 . Ef fe c t o f va ry ing the l oa d ing ra t e

A . O pe ra t iona l pa ra me te r s A a B h C h D b

TS in feed slurry (%) 4 6 8 10

VS in feed slurry (%) 94 + 2 94 + 2 94 + 2 94 + 2

VS load ing rat e (kg m - 3day - ~) 3-8 5-7 7-6 9-5

H R T (da ys) 16 16 16 16

B . G a s p r o d u c t i o n

Dai ly gas y ie ld ( l i te rs) 54 .0 88.0 71.0 32.5

Gas pro duc t ion ra te (vol /v ol /day ) 1 .2 1 .95 1-7 0-72

Gas y ie ld (m3/kg VS adde d) 0 .51 0 .46 0 .34 0 .12

G a s y i e ld (ma /kg TS a dde d ) 0 .48 0 .52 0 .32 0 .12

M e tha ne (%) 53 .1 42 .8 32 .4 30 .3

Spe c i fi c me tha ne p rodu c t ion

(m3/kg VS adde d) 0 .27 0 .19 0 .11 0-04

C. Eff lue nt charac te r is t ics

To ta l a lka lin i ty (mg / l i t e r a s 1715 3450 512 0 428 0

CaCO~)

N H a -N 2 (mg / l i te r ) 185 450 560 490

Tota l vo la t i le fa t ty ac ids as

a c e t a t e (mg / l it e r ) 710 0 5121 712 0 7450

pH 7.0 6 0 5 3 4 .3

°Values a re an av erage of three runs.

hV a lue s obse rve d ju s t be fo re t he d ige s t e r s w e n t sou r .

Page 5: 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 5/6

  igestion of ruit and vegetable wastes

47

5 0

t . O

o

m m

~

3 0

~

iJ

o

i

a . 2 . 0

l

/ , 8 12 16 20 2e ,

T ; m e 2 / , h o u r s )

Fig. 2. Pattern of biogas production in 24 h period while operating at various hydraulic retention times.

/ x - - , 20 day; [] ,24 day HRT.

o ,1 6 day;

t h e g as p r o d u c t i o n i n a 2 4 h p e r i o d . M a x i m u m g a s

w a s p r o d u c e d a t t h e f o u r t h h o u r a f t e r a d d i t i o n o f

f e e d a n d t h e r e w a s a s p u r t i n g a s p r o d u c t i o n a t

m o r e o r l e ss r e g u l a r i n t e r v a l s. M o r e o v e r , m o r e

t h a n 6 0 o f t h e g a s w a s p r o d u c e d w i t h i n t h e f i rs t

1 2 h o f a n a e r o b i c d i g e s t i o n . F u r t h e r m o r e , c o m -

p a r i s o n s o f th e p e r c e n t a g e o f g a s p r o d u c e d a t

r e g u l a r i n t e rv a l s o f t i m e i n d i g e s t e r s o p e r a t i n g a t

v a r i o u s H R T s i n d i c a t e d t h a t d u r i n g t h e f i r s t 1 2 h

w h i l e 7 4 - 5 o f t h e t o t a l b i o g a s i s p r o d u c e d i n

d i g e s t e r s o p e r a t i n g a t s h o r t e r h y d r a u l i c r e t e n t i o n

t imes o f 16 days , on ly 59-03 of the to ta l gas i s

p r o d u c e d i n di g es te r s o p e r a t in g a t a 2 4 d a y s H R T

b y t h e s a m e p e r i o d . T h i s m a y b e d u e t o v a r i a t i o n

i n t h e m i c r o f l o r a d o m i n a t i n g i n d i g e s t e r s o p e r a t -

i n g a t d if f e re n t r e t e n t i o n t i m e s . C h a r t r a i n & Z e i -

k u s ( 1 9 8 6 ) h a v e o b s e r v e d t h a t

Methanosarc ina

b a r k e d

d o m i n a t e u n d e r c o n d i t io n s w h e n t h e d i lu -

t ion r a t e i s h igh whi l e

Methanothr ix soehgeni i

p r e -

d o m i n a t e u n d e r c o n d i t i o n s o f l o w d i l u t i o n ra t e s .

B a s e d o n t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s i t is fe l t t h a t i n o r d e r

to increa se the e f f i c i ency of d iges t ion , the da i ly

v o l u m e o f f ee d s l u r r y c o u l d b e i n t r o d u c e d i n t o t h e

d i g e s te r s t w i c e a d a y , w h e n o p e r a t i n g d i g e s t e rs a t

s h o r t h y d r a u l i c r e t e n t i o n t i m e .

C O N C L U S I O N

T h u s i n t h e s e s t u d i e s , i t c a n b e s e e n t h a t f r u i t

w a s t e s s u c h a s m a n g o , p i n e a p p l e , o r a n g e , b a n a n a ,

j a c k f r u i t a n d t o m a t o c a n b e u s e d a s f e e d s t o c k f o r

b i o g a s p r o d u c t i o n b y u s i n g t h e m i n s u c c e s s i o n f o r

s h o r t p e r i o d s o f t i m e ( 5 d a y s ) w i t h o u t a n y s u p p l e -

m e n t a t i o n w i th n i t ro g e n u n d e r m e s o p h i li c c o n d i -

t io n s . T h e d i g e st e r o p e r a t i n g a t a 1 6 d a y H R T a n d

a t a l o a d in g r a t e o f 4 0 k g T S m - 3 d a y -1 h a s b e e n

o p e r a t e d f o r 1½ y e a r s a n d h a s s h o w n n o s i gn s o f

f a il u re . A n a v e r a g e y i e l d o f 0 . 5 - 0 . 6 m 3 o f b i o g a s

p e r k g V S a d d e d w a s r e c o r d e d w i t h a m e t h a n e

c o n t e n t o f 5 1 - 5 3 . B a s e d o n t h e s e o b s e rv a t io n s ,

f u r t h e r s t u d i e s a r e i n p r o g r e s s t o c a r r y o u t l a r g e

sca le t r i a ls in 1 .5 an d 25 m 3 d iges te r s .

R E F E R E N E S

AOAC (1975). OfficialMethods of Analysis 12th edn. ed. W.

Horwitz. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,

Washington, DC, pp. 135,198,606.

APHA (1975). American Public Health Association Standard

Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water

14th edn. APHA and American Water Works Association

and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC,

pp. 293, 440.

Bryant, M. P., Varel, V. H., Frobish, R. A. Issacson, H. R.

(1977). Biological potential of thermophilic methanogene-

sis from cattle wastes. Proceedings of a seminar on Microb-

ial Energy Conversion sponsored by the UN Institute for

Research and Training (UNITHR) and the Ministry for

Research and Technology of the Federal Republic of Ger-

many held in G6ttingen, October, 1976, pp. 347-59.

Chartrain, M. Zeikns, J. G. (1986). Microbial ecophysiol-

ogy of whey biomethanation characterisation of bacterial

trophic populations and prevalence: species in continuous

culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51,188-96.

Page 6: 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

7/23/2019 1-s2.0-096085249290117G-main

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1-s20-096085249290117g-main 6/6

4 8 P . H s w a n a t h S . S . D e v i K . N a n d

De Renzo , D. J . (1977) . Energy fro m B ioconversion of W aste

Materials. No yes Da ta C o . , New Je rsey .

D N E S R e p o r t ( 1 9 8 9 ) . F i n a l R e p o r t o f th e w o r k c a r r i e d o u t

in the p ro jec t en t i t l ed Mic rob io log ica l stud ies on the con-

ve rs ion of food proces s ing and o the r re la ted agro- indus -

t r i a l was te s fo r b iogas p roduc t ion (No, 5 /2 /41 /85-BE)

• s p o n s o r e d b y t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f N o n - C o n v e n t i o n a l

E n e r g y S o u r c e s , G o v e r n m e n t o f I n d i a .

Haw kes , D. L . (1980) . F ac tors a f fec t ing ne t ene rgy p roduc-

t ion f rom m esophi l i c anae rob ic d iges t ion . In Anaerobic

Digestion ed . D. A. S ta f fo rd , B . I . W hea t ley D. E .

Hughes . Appl ied S c ience P ubl ishe rs , Londo n , p . 144 .

Ho bson , P . N. , Bou sfie ld, S . Sum mers , R. (1981).

Methane

Production from Agricultural and Domestic Wastes.

App l ied S c ience P ubl i she rs , Lo ndo n , p . 207 .

Ho r ton , R . (1980). Th e im pl ica t ion o f eng inee r ing des ign on

anae rob ic d iges t ion sys tem . In Ana erob ic Digestion ed.

D. A. S ta ffo rd , B . I . W hea t ley D. E . Hugh es . App l ied

S c ience P ubl i she rs, Lon don , pp . 144 , 333 .

Kno l , C . M. , Ne l son , D. D. De Waer t , J . (1978) . B iogas

produc t ion by anae rob ic d iges t ion o f f ru i t and vege tab le

waste . J. Sci. Fo od Agric. 2 9 , 8 2 2 .

Kr i shna Nan d Man j reka r , S . P . (1988). Mic rob io log ica l

convers ion of foo d proces s ing was te s in to food , feed , fue l

and chem ica l s . Proceedings of the Second International

Food Convent ion he ld a t Cen t ra l F ood Technolog ica l

Resea rch Ins t i tu te , My sore , Ind ia , on F eb . 18-2 3 , p . 272 .

Lane , A. G. (1984) . Anae rob ic d iges t ion o f o range pee l .

Fo od Technol. Australia 3 6 , 1 2 5 - 7 .

P r e m a V i s w a n a t h K r i s h n a N a n d ( 1 9 8 9 ) . I n f lu e n c e o f p e n -

c il lin on the s t ab i l i s a tion o f anae r ob ic d iges t ion o f ra in t ree

ke rne l s fo r m e thane gene ra t ion .

J. Ferment. Bioengng

68 ,

1 5 4 - 6 .

P y le , O . L . (1980) . A nae ro b ic d iges te r des igns in the th i rd

wor ld . In Anaero bic Digest ion ed. D. A. S tafford, B. I .

W hea t ley D. E . Hugh es . Ap pl ied S c ience P ubl i she rs ,

L o n d o n , p . 3 6 7 .

Ranade, D. R. , Yeole , T . Y. , Meher, K. K. , Gadre , IL V.

God bole , S . M. (1989) . B iogas f rom so l id was te o r ig ina ted

dur ing b i s cu i t and choco la te p roduc t ion . A pre l im ina ry

s tudy.

Biological Wastes

2 8 , 1 5 7 - 6 1 .

Sales , D. , Valcareel , M. V. , Ro me ro, L. I . M art ine z de La

Ossa , T . (1989) . An ae rob ic d iges t ion k ine t ic s o f wine d i s -

t i l ler ies waste w aters . J . Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 4 5 ,

1 4 7 - 6 2 .

S anders , E A. B loo dgoo d , D. E . (1965) . Th e e f fec t o f

n i t r o g e n to c a r b o n r a t i o o n a n a e r o b i c d e c o m p o s i t i o n . J .

Water. Poll. C ont. Fed .

37 , 1741 .

S um i thra Devi , S . Kr i shna Na nd (1989) . Mic rob io log ica l

p r e t r e a tm e n t o f m a n g o p e e l f o r b i o g a s p r o d u c t i o n . J. Mi-

crob. Biotechnol. 4 (2), 110-1 5 .