Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
PSRC Executive Board
March 26, 2009
2
Overview
● Discussion/Future Action Item:
− The Executive Board will be asked to take action in May to adopt a Technical Amendment to the VISION 2040 Regional Growth Strategy
● RGS Technical Amendment
What is the purpose of the Technical Amendment?
What does the Technical Amendment do?
What is included in the Technical Amendment package?
Next steps
3
VISION 2040 Regional Growth Strategy
4
Purpose of Amendment
● Executive Board authority:
− “The Regional Council recognizes that as cities continue to grow, both through net increase and through annexation of unincorporated areas, their population and employment levels may change significantly. To reflect these changes, it is anticipated that the Regional Council’s Executive Board will make a technical amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy to potentially reclassify cities before the region’s counties undertake the next round of Growth Management Act target-setting work.” (VISION 2040, p.18)
5
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
● What is the Technical Amendment?
Updates the numbers in the Regional Growth Strategy to reflect:
1. Boundary changes due to annexations and UGA adjustments
2. City reclassifications from Small City to Larger City due to annexations and/or real growth
6
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
● Why is a Technical Amendment necessary?
Annexations, UGA adjustments and city reclassifications change the “role” of affected communities in implementing the RGS
Provides counties and cities with numbers that reflect current boundaries to use in updating growth targets
7
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
● What does the Technical Amendment do?
It shifts 2000 base year population and employment for annexed areas, UGA adjustment areas and reclassified cities to the appropriate regional geography
It shifts the proportional 2000-2040 RGS growth allocation associated with annexed areas, UGA adjustment areas and reclassified cities to the appropriate regional geographies
8
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
● What doesn’t the Technical Amendment do?
It does not change the RGS base year – the base year remains 2000
It does not involve policy changes to the Regional Growth Strategy that may otherwise trigger a SEPA action
9
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
Regional Growth Strategy for Population, 2000-2040
Adopted April 24, 2008
Technical AmendmentDraft January 8, 2009
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Addi
tiona
l Pop
ulat
ion
Metropolitan Cities Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Uninc'd UGA Rural Total
King County 41% - 294,000 32% - 230,000 14% - 98,000 5% - 39,000 6% - 43,000 3% - 20,000 724,000 - 42%
Kitsap County 20% - 30,000 12% - 18,000 11% - 16,000 8% - 12,000 30% - 45,000 19% - 28,000 149,000 - 9%
Pierce County 32% - 127,000 19% - 75,000 6% - 23,000 15% - 57,000 22% - 87,000 6% - 24,000 393,000 - 23%
Snohomish County 20% - 89,000 9% - 40,000 10% - 44,000 9% - 40,000 42% - 187,000 10% - 46,000 446,000 - 26%
Total Increase 32% - 540,000 21% - 363,000 11% - 181,000 9% - 148,000 21% - 362,000 7% - 118,000 1,712,000 - 100%
2000 Base 996,000 589,000 331,000 264,000 604,000 493,000 3,276,000
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Addi
tiona
l Pop
ulat
ion
Metropolitan Cities Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Uninc'd UGA Rural Total
King County 41% - 294,000 32% - 233,000 15% - 108,000 5% - 35,000 5% - 34,000 3% - 20,000 724,000 - 42%
Kitsap County 26% - 39,000 13% - 19,000 11% - 16,000 8% - 12,000 26% - 39,000 16% - 25,000 149,000 - 9%
Pierce County 32% - 127,000 20% - 77,000 8% - 32,000 13% - 52,000 21% - 81,000 6% - 24,000 393,000 - 23%
Snohomish County 20% - 90,000 9% - 40,000 19% - 85,000 8% - 37,000 33% - 148,000 10% - 46,000 446,000 - 26%
Total Increase 32% - 550,000 22% - 369,000 14% - 240,000 8% - 136,000 18% - 302,000 7% - 115,000 1,712,000 - 100%
2000 Base 995,000 589,000 332,000 257,000 621,000 482,000 3,276,000
Reflects 2000 political boundaries
Reflects 2007 political boundaries
10
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
Population Difference: Technical Amendment - Adopted
-80,000
-60,000
-40,000
-20,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
Popu
latio
n Al
loca
tion
Chan
ge
Metropolitan Cities Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Uninc'd UGA Rural Total
King County 0.0% 0 0.4% 3,000 1.3% 10,000 -0.6% -4,000 -1.2% -9,000 0.0% 0 0 0.0%
Kitsap County 5.9% 9,000 0.6% 1,000 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 -4.2% -6,000 -2.3% -3,000 0 0.0%
Pierce County 0.0% 0 1.5% 2,000 2.2% 9,000 -1.2% -5,000 -1.5% -6,000 0.0% 0 0 0.0%
Snohomish County 0.3% 1,000 0.0% 0 9.1% 41,000 -0.7% -3,000 -8.7% -39,000 0.0% 0 0 0.0%
Total Increase 0.6% 10,000 0.3% 6,000 3.5% 59,000 -0.7% -12,000 -3.5% -60,000 -0.2% -3,000 0 0.0%
2000 Base -1,000 0 1,000 -7,000 17,000 -11,000 0
11
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
Regional Growth Strategy for Employment, 2000-2040
Adopted April 24, 2008
Technical AmendmentDraft January 8, 2009
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Addi
tiona
l Pop
ulat
ion
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Addi
tiona
l Em
ploy
men
t
Metropolitan Cities Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Uninc'd UGA Rural Total
King County 45% - 311,000 38% - 262,000 10% - 69,000 4% - 25,000 3% - 23,000 1% - 5,000 695,000 - 57%
Kitsap County 22% - 14,000 23% - 15,000 8% - 5,000 12% - 8,000 28% - 18,000 8% - 5,000 65,000 - 5%
Pierce County 46% - 97,000 19% - 40,000 3% - 6,000 17% - 37,000 12% - 25,000 3% - 7,000 212,000 - 17%
Snohomish County 36% - 89,000 14% - 35,000 13% - 31,000 12% - 30,000 19% - 47,000 6% - 14,000 246,000 - 20%
Total Increase 42% - 511,000 29% - 352,000 9% - 111,000 8% - 100,000 9% - 113,000 3% - 31,000 1,219,000 - 100%
2000 Base 923,000 521,000 121,000 106,000 117,000 64,000 1,853,000
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Addi
tiona
l Pop
ulat
ion
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Addi
tiona
l Em
ploy
men
t
Metropolitan Cities Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Uninc'd UGA Rural Total
King County 45% - 311,000 38% - 262,000 11% - 74,000 3% - 22,000 3% - 20,000 1% - 5,000 695,000 - 57%
Kitsap County 22% - 14,000 23% - 15,000 8% - 5,000 13% - 9,000 27% - 18,000 7% - 4,000 65,000 - 5%
Pierce County 46% - 97,000 19% - 41,000 7% - 15,000 14% - 30,000 10% - 22,000 3% - 7,000 212,000 - 17%
Snohomish County 37% - 91,000 14% - 35,000 23% - 56,000 6% - 15,000 14% - 34,000 6% - 14,000 246,000 - 20%
Total Increase 42% - 513,000 29% - 354,000 12% - 151,000 6% - 76,000 8% - 94,000 2% - 30,000 1,218,000 - 100%
2000 Base 930,000 531,000 121,000 106,000 143,000 62,000 1,892,000
Reflects 2000 political boundaries
Reflects 2007 political boundaries
12
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
Employment Difference: Technical Amendment - Adopted
-80,000
-60,000
-40,000
-20,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
Empl
oym
ent A
lloca
tion
Chan
ge
Metropolitan Cities Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Uninc'd UGA Rural Total
King County 0.0% 0 0.1% 0 0.8% 5,000 -0.4% -3,000 -0.4% -3,000 0.0% 0 0 0.0%
Kitsap County 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 1,000 -0.4% -0 -0.9% -1,000 0 0.0%
Pierce County 0.0% 0 0.4% 1,000 4.3% 9,000 -3.2% -7,000 -1.5% -3,000 0.0% 0 0 0.0%
Snohomish County 0.8% 2,000 0.1% 0 10.3% 25,000 -6.2% -15,000 -5.1% -13,000 0.0% 0 0 0.0%
Total Increase 0.2% 2,000 0.1% 2,000 3.3% 40,000 -2.0% -24,000 -1.5% -19,000 -0.0% -1,000 -1,000 -0.0%
2000 Base 7,000 10,000 0 0 26,000 -2 39,000
13
Regional Growth StrategyTechnical Amendment
● What is included in the Technical Amendment package?
1. Appendix I-A: Revised RGS charts and tables*
2. Appendix I-B: Supplemental RGS technical tables**
3. Appendix I-C: Revised table of city classifications by county by regional geography*
4. Appendix II-A: 2000-2007 population & employment trends and the Regional Growth Strategy**
5. Appendix II-B: PSRC guidance for aligning local growth targets with the Regional Growth Strategy**
*Items to be adopted by Executive Board action to amend VISION 2040**Supplemental background information
14
Next Steps
● Executive Board
March 26, 2009: Executive Board is briefed on the GMPB recommendation for a technical amendment to the VISION 2040 Regional Growth Strategy
May 28, 2009: Executive Board action to adopt the technical amendment to the VISION 2040 Regional Growth Strategy
15
Questions?
● Contact: Norman AbbottDirector of Growth ManagementPuget Sound Regional Council(206) 464-7134 [email protected]
Carol NaitoPrincipal Planner-DemographerPuget Sound Regional Council(206) 464-7535 [email protected]
