Upload
phoebe-bates
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Proposed Deemed Savings Values for Residential Refrigerator Recycling
Programs
June 7, 2005
2
Program Summary
• Program Energy Goal – Early retirement of existing inefficient refrigerators
• Secondary “Non-Energy” goals– Removal of “second” refrigerators from stock– Recycling of refrigerants, metals and other materials
(PCBs)
3
There’s Lot’s of PotentialSales Weighted Average Residential Refrigerator Energy Use
0200400600800
100012001400160018002000
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Year Manufactured
An
nu
al U
se (
kW
h)
4
Energy Savings Issues
• Removal of units that were already going to be “decommissioned”
• Removal of non-functioning units• Removal of units that were only used “part-
time”• Replacement of “decommissioned” units with
other “used” units• Interaction with space conditioning
5
Prior Program Experience:Net Savings and Remaining Life
• Net savings after adjustments for “free-ridership,” replacements, partial use, etc => – California
• 2002 Evaluation- 53% - 57% • 2003 Evaluation- 35%
– Colorado• 61%
– Snoh PUD Pilot • 62% of gross savings
• Remaining Equipment Life – 6 to 8 yrs
6
Prior Program Experience – Gross Savings
• California– 1996 = 2130 kWh/yr– 2002 = 1915 kWh/yr– 2003 = 2128 kWh/yr
• Snoh PUD – 1324 kWh/yr
7
Proposed Inputs to Deemed Savings Analysis
• Average Unit Age = 24 yrs (base year = 2001)
• Average Unit Consumption = 1453 kWh/yr
• Remaining Unit Life = 6 years
• Average Cost for Recycling = $140
8
Net-to-Gross Adjustment
• Net-to-Gross Adjustments• Unit would have been kept but not used - 6%• Unit would have been retired w/o program – 7%• Unit was only used Part-Time – 10%• Unit will be replaced w/another used unit – 11%• Space Conditioning Interaction
– Inside conditioned space – 14%– Outside conditioned space – 0%
• Overall Adjustment – Units not replace – 70% (40% of units)– Units replaced New Energy Star – 68% (60% of units)
9
Proposed Deemed Value Input Assumptions
• Gross Savings – 1453 kWh/yr• Net-to-Gross – 69% • Net Site Savings (All units) – 829 kWh/yr• Remaining Measure Life – 6 years• Average Unit Cost (Including utility administrative
cost) - $140/unit• Units Replaced – 60% • Units not Replaced – 40%
10
Levelized Cost for Replacements by Vintage
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Lev
eliz
ed C
ost
of R
ecyc
ling
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29
Refrigerator Age
11
Levelized Cost for Replacements by Vintage
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.8
TR
C B
/C R
atio
of
Rec
yclin
g
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29
Refrigerator Age
12
Proposed Deemed Values
• Net Site Savings (All units) – 829 kWh/yr• Levelized Cost – 3.1 cents/kWh• B/C ratio (TRC) – 1.3• C&RD credit - $110.81*
*80% of bulk system value, PV to Utility System is $278 of which $140 is local distribution system value