1PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Particles and Fields PackageQuarterly Status Review (QSR)

January 19, 2011

Dave Curtis, PFP PM

2PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SSL Contracting Status

• Phase B/C/D Contract in place.• A budget breakdown by PFP schedule milestone has

been submitted to support EVM at GSFC

3PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Schedule Status

• While lots of progress is bring made and the team is at full strength, we are still showing some slippage in getting the EMs together

• Have re-arranged the EM schedule to get the system electrical functional done as soon as possible, putting off the EM STATIC and SWIA instrument calibrations (which now don’t complete till after instrument PDR)

• Looking at ways to break bottle-necks– Recently hired another technician and an additional test

engineer– Have identified potential help at GSFC in winding EM magnetics

• Some erosion of post-CDR schedule margin– Due to late EM I&T– STATIC, PFDPU– Still have 16 weeks of margin to delivery on critical path– Working on ways to improve margin

4PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Manpower

• RBSP-EFW instrument approaching delivery– Most of the people we need have transitioned 100%– a few still completing tasks, notably a key technician– Hired an extra technician this month

• Solar Probe Plus is starting to impact a few team members– Looking at ways to share and augment team as needed

5PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Accomplishments

• All required EM EEE parts at SSL• All flight Active parts are on order

– Passive parts list being updated, ordering in progress

• Most PWBs layed out, some loaded and in test– see below

• DCB loaded, in test– Key element for EM I&T with LM in April

• Most EM Mechanical parts are in fab– Some part-level design work still in progress on SWIA/STATIC

• PFDPU simulator GSE delivered to GSFC, LASP, SSL Instrument teams

• More in instrument sections…

6PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Ongoing Work

• Supporting Project planning process• Supporting EMC, Payload, SDT working groups

• Completing EM layouts, board loading• Continue EM board testing• Completing EM mechanical part drawings, getting parts

fabricated• Preparing for STATIC TOF system acoustic test later this

month or early next month

7PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

EM Status Summary

• PFP EM & GSE Layouts– 31 total, including GSFC/MAG, LASP/LPW, CESR/SWEA– 28 layouts complete (27 boards fabricated, 16 boards loaded, 7

completed test)– 3 remaining layouts near completion

• LM Interface Test preparations (4/5/2011):– DCB board loaded, in hardware test– GSE & FSW ready to start software testing soon– Current schedule shows ready by 3/1/2011 for the LM test

• EM detectors on order (MCP, SSD, foils, magnets)– SWIA, STATIC MCP, STATIC foils, SEP magnets delivered– SEP EM detectors due in 2 weeks.

• EM Mechanical parts:– PFDPU, STATIC TOF in fab– Remaining SWIA, STATIC parts into fab soon – SEP EM mechanical in assembly– LPW boom, SWEA (SSL) parts complete

8PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

EM Status

REG1

DCB1

REG2

DCB2

IIB

SEP1

MAG1

MAG2

LPW BEB

LPW DFB

LPW 1

LPW 2

EUV

MAG 1 MAG 2

STATIC

SWEA

SWIA

RSDPU

PWR

PROC

IUVS

MEB*

OS

CS

IFCTL

CDH

PS/HV

RF DET

NGIMS

EUT**

Antenna

Coaxial Cable

PA/PSM1

PA/PSM2

BPM1

BPM2

RFM1

RFM2

FSU1

FSU2

Required for I/F Testing at LM

In Lay-out

In Fab / Assembly

In Test

Integrated to chassis

IF Test H/W and EM STATUS

3/2

/11

BACK

*LADEE EM will be used for IF Test

PFP RS NGIMS ELECTRA

NOTES:

3/11/11

** Electra PT BPM will be used for IF Test

3/18/113/30/11 3/23/11

Not Started

Flash FPGA***

LVPS

DIG

*** Flash PFPGA is a daughterboard for the DCB and STATIC DIG

LVPS

DIG

Sweep

Preamp + MCP

Anode

LVPS

DIG

ACC + MCP

Anode

TDC

Preamp

DAP

SEP2

DAP

SEP1

DFE

DFE

SEP2

DFE

DFE

MAG HTRT

T MAG HTR is a daughterboard to the IIB Board

MAG HTRT

Preamptt

Anode

tt

HVPStt

PFDPU

Ready for Test

Flash FPGA***

Flash FPGA***

2/1

0/1

1

1/5/

11

3/9/

11

12/3

0/1

0

3/4/

11

TB

D/1

0

Test Completed

Preamp

Preamp

tt from STEREO EM

Sweep

Ready to Integrate

9PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

PFP RFA Status

Review Actions Closed %SWEA Peer 20 20 100%

Mechanical Peer 8 8 100%Analyzer Peer 11 11 100%Power Peer 0Digital Peer 4 4 100%FSW Peer 0LPW Peer 11 11 100%MAG Peer 5 5 100%

LPW Mech Peer 7 6 86%

IPDR 6 6 100%

Totals 72 71 99%

10PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Trades, Issues

• HV801 issue still open– Two options: Amptek HV801, Micropac 66353– Amptek delivered some EM HV801s

• Have parts for EM– Current plan is to buy HV801s from LADEE NMS, who has parts

on order they no longer need

• Working on an analysis to decide if the PFDPU mechanical design needs to be augmented to support the PWBs to avoid excessive displacements in vibe– MAG EM PWB has option for a center support, others do not– Looks like we can probably eliminate center support, analysis

about ready for review

11PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Top Risks

P-08 Retired (EUV sensor damaged by atmosphere exposure); adequate safeing system in place

MAVEN PFP RISK MANAGEMENT Chg RANK ID Approach TITLE

55 10 15 20 25

1 P-17 Mitigate Parts Qualification

44 8 12 16 20

2 P-01 Mitigate SSL Manpower

33 8 9 12 15

3 P-04 Watch Solar Array Magnetics

22 4 6 8 10

4 P-14 Mitigate HV801 Problem

11 2 3 4 5

5 P-07 ResearchDelayed LPW Boom Deployment

1 2 3 4 5

Criticality Approach

High

Medium

Low

LIKELIHOOD

Improved

Worsening

Unchanged

New this month

Mitigate

Watch

Accept

Research

CONSEQUENCES

L * C Trend

*

P01

P7

P4P14

P17

12PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Risks List

ID Title Type P I Crit Risk Statement Impact Term Plan Approach Comments

P-01 SSL ManpowerProject

Execution3 2 M

Delays in RBSP leads to manpower conflicts at SSL

Schedule erosion, cost to recover

Near Term

Hire new people to take routine tasks off key personnel

Mitigate Review in March 2010Add extra Power Converter person 1/2010Add extra ME 2/2010Add extra QA 8/2010Add extra Tech & Test Engineers 1/2011

P-04Solar Array Magnetics

Mission Performance

1 4 L

Proximity of MAG sensor to solar arrays results in not meeting the magnetics requriements

Magnetics [MRD84]

Near Term

Consider ways to increase distance between MAG and cells

Watch Magnetics Working Group working on optionsChange to U-string system, slightly longer bracket. Ananlysis looks good

P-07Delayed LPW

Boom Deployment

Mission Performance

1 3 L

Waiting till after MOI to deploy LPW booms results in them sitting undeployed for over a year, increasing the risk of deployment failure

Potential severe degradation of LPW measurement

Far Term

Investigate if LPW booms can be deployed early

Research Early deployment of LPW booms reduces this risk. Actual risk of failure is very low. Risk that we may be asked to do an expensive verification is moderate

P-14 HV801 ProblemProject

Execution1 3 L

If HV801 not available a redesign would be required to use alternate (larger) parts

Schedule, Mass Mid Term

Watch what programs ahead of MAVEN do; look into alternate parts

Mitigate Micropak alternate part in test. EM parts found, FM parts identified

P-17Parts

QualificationProject

Execution3 3 M

If parts fail qualification then system would have to be redesigned for alternate (which may also have to be qualified and may have lower performance)

Schedule, Cost, Performance

Near Term

Start parts qualification as soon as possible (but delayed to FY11 for funding)

Mitigate First round of parts radiation testing started. SEL test results look good

13PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

PFP Mass

• No significant change

Instrument QuantityCBE Each

[kg]CBE

Total [kg] Cont. (%)Total [kg] (CBE+cnt)

Particles and Fields 22.56 21% 27.19LPW Total 6.18 23% 7.62

LPW Booms 2 5.150 28% 6.578EUV Assembly 1 1.030 1% 1.039

STATIC Total 2.36 35% 3.19SWEA Total 1.95 -1% 1.94SWIA Total 2.02 30% 2.62SEP Total 1.27 20% 1.52MAG Total 0.65 20% 0.78PFDPU Total 5.90 -1% 5.86PF Intra-Instrument Harness Total 2.23 64% 3.67

14PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Mass Tracking Chart

PFP Mass Trend

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

10/1/2009 12/1/2009 1/31/2010 4/2/2010 6/2/2010 8/2/2010 10/2/2010 12/2/2010

Date

kg

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Mass CBE, kg

Mass NTE, kg

Mass Margin %

15PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

PFP Power

• CCR approved for SEP, SWEA, SWIA, STATIC operational heaters– NTE increased, adequate margin

• No significant change to CBE

Instrument CBE [W] Cont. (%) NTE [W] CBE [W] Cont. (%) NTE[W] CBE [W] Cont. (%) NTE[W]Particles and Fields

Off (heater only) 0.00 0.00 17.66 15% 20.31 17.66 15% 20.31Standby 9.30 35% 12.52 14.45 15% 16.62 23.75 23% 29.14Nominal 19.20 16% 22.29 16.82 15% 19.34 36.02 16% 41.63

Peak 31.90 16% 37.01 100.61 15% 115.70 132.51 15% 152.71Orbit Average 19.31 16% 22.39 16.82 15% 19.34 36.13 16% 41.73

Orbit Average:LPW 4.77 15% 5.49 0.00 0% 0.00 4.77 15% 5.49EUV 0.16 15% 0.18 1.80 15% 2.07 1.96 15% 2.25STATIC 4.39 19% 5.21 1.91 15% 2.20 6.30 18% 7.41SWEA 1.07 15% 1.24 2.95 15% 3.39 4.02 15% 4.63SWIA 2.05 22% 2.50 3.08 15% 3.54 5.13 18% 6.04SEP 2.60 -14% 2.24 5.48 15% 6.30 8.08 6% 8.54MAG 2.47 15% 2.84 1.60 15% 1.84 4.07 15% 4.68PFDPU 1.78 51% 2.69 0.00 0% 0.00 1.78 51% 2.69

Operational Heater Total

16PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

PFP Power Trend

PFP Power Trend

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

10/1/2009 12/1/2009 1/31/2010 4/2/2010 6/2/2010 8/2/2010 10/2/2010 12/2/2010

Date

W

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Power CBE, W

Power NTE, W

Power Margin %

17PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

PFP Data Rate

• Per 2009-6-9 allocations from Bruce

Rate [bps]Particles and FieldsLPW/EUV 717.0STATIC 2000.0SWEA 600.0SWIA 604.0SEP 160.0MAG 660.0PFDPU 30.0

Total 4771.0

Instrument

18PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Requirements Verification Status

• Nothing new to report.

19PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN Magnetometer Status

January 2011

Connerney, Sheppard, Schnurr, Oliversen, Espley, etc.

20PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

GSFC/MAG - Accomplishments Last Month(s)

• All MAG-related RFA’s have been closed (IPDR, Mission PDR).

• MAG a/c heater controller prototype board fabricated, tuned, tested.

• Procurement status of long-lead and limited availability items:

– Identified source (ST Micro) for rad-hard CMOS quad bilateral

switches (4066’s).

– FM sensor mechanical assembly parts received.

• Completed screening and initial burn-in of magnetics piece parts

(transformers, inductors) for EM analog board.

• Completed review of LM Mechanical ICD; sensor harness drawings;

• EM analog/digital board received; EM parts kitted; board in fabrication.

21PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

GSFC/MAG - Accomplishments Last Month(s)

• EM sensor assembled, wired, awaiting pigtail installation.

• GSE sensor harness fabrication complete.

• GSE received from UCB, setup, checkout, familiarization.

• Designed & sent to fabrication Hypertronics connector breakout

PWBs. Assembly on hold awaiting connectors.

• FPGA designer reviewing requirements and specifications.

• Updated MAG Specification Document/Users Manual.

• Updated MAG schedule w/ Jim Perry as of Jan 12, 2011.

• MAG Lab staff began migrating to MAVEN FGM MIS Configuration

Mgm’t System.

22PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

The MAVEN EM Sensor Assembly

23PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Near Term Plans & Open Issues

• Complete assembly EM analog/digital board.• Modify Hypertronics connector alignment fixture (as received from

UCB) to fit MAG EM analog/digital board.• Continue MAG software requirements discussion w/UCB. Have

reduced requirements (e.g., no need for range control in PFDPU); complete simulation data compression (differences) scheme w/MGS archive data set.

• Design and build connector bracket for analog/digital board sensor interface connector.

• Begin winding FM sensor ring cores, feedback/sense bobbins, fabricate sensor assembly terminal boards.

• Finalize MAG FPGA design requirements.

24PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Near Term Plans & Open Issues

• Need several Hypertronics connectors (from UCB) for EM board fabrication and GSE.

• Need 5 AirBorn connector sets (from UCB) for MAG a/c heater boards and GSE.

• Fabrication of EM board delay due to workload (Code 562); now estimated completion Mid-February.

• Still working to get Steve Himes (Code 302) assigned for MAG QA.

25PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN PFP SWIA Status

January 2011

Jasper Halekas, SWIA Lead

26PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SWIA Progress

• Electrical Progress– Anode board loaded and tested, adding mechanical clamp parts– Digital board loaded, in testing– Preamp/MCP PWB fabricated

• PREAMP side being loaded• MCP side being kitted

– LVPS PWB kitted (except magnetics), out for loading– Sweep prototype in re-routing, out for PWB fab soon

• Mechanical Progress– Anode/MCP parts fabricated, in assembly– HV connector design complete– Pin-puller and attenuator design making rapid progress– Final detailing of analyzer and e-box in progress– Most parts should be out for fabrication by early February

• Detector Progress– Microchannel plates should be in testing by early February– A121 first round of testing complete, testing on EM board soon

27PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SWIA Issues

• Staffing– Board layout crunch finally over– MEs finally on MAVEN full time

– Tight point now is technician time for loading boards, building harnessing, magnetics winding, etc.

28PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SWIA Boards

Loaded Anode Loaded Digital

PREAMP/MCPHV Top PREAMP/MCPHV Bottom

29PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN PFP SWEA Status

January 2011

Dave Mitchell, SWEA Lead

30PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SWEA Status, EM - CESR

• Mechanical– EM sensor assembled, functional tests complete and under review.

– Black nickel chosen to coat deflectors, toroidal grids, and external surfaces (to be done in U.S. by Anoplate).

– Cu2S selected to coat interior of hemispheres (to be done in France). Currently evaluating details of coating the top cap – desire is for black nickel with Cu2S on curved portion.

EM sensor in vacuum chamber

10 cm

31PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SWEA Status, EM - SSL

• Mechanical– Pedestal fabrication complete.

– Rest of SSL EM refurbished and tested.

• LVPC– PWB fab complete.

– Currently being loaded at Digicom.

• Digital– PWB fab complete and loaded.

– FPGA implementation in progress.

SWEA Pedestal

SWEA Digital

32PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN PFP STATIC Status

January 2011

Jim McFadden, STATIC Lead

33PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

STATIC Accomplishments

• Carbon foil inspection scanner purchased, tested (see photo)• EM Anode and Preamp board loaded, ready for test (see photos)• MCA purchased for characterizing microchannel plates• HV Sweep board schematic updates complete • Stack-stick multiplier for MCP supply built (replacement for VMI part)• Digital board being loaded (photo of Digital and daughter) • TOF mechanical parts - fit check completed• All mechanical parts required for acoustic test are either already

fabricated or out for fabrication• Deflector mechanical/electrical interface design complete• Grid attenuator mechanical/electrical interface design complete• FPGA specification updated and first ETU version of FPGA is ready for

test• Radiation training by Marckwordt completed

34PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

STATIC Carbon Foil Scanner Results

Scan showing section with good foil coverageWhite pixels have missing foils or have tears

35PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

STATIC EM Anode & Preamp loaded

36PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

STATIC EM Digital and Daughter

37PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

STATIC Open Issues

• Carbon foil handling procedures being developed – (bake at 200oC in air does NOT destroys foils – helps with inspection & contamination)

• Developing cleaning procedures for grid-frames to remove rejected carbon foils and allow reuse of grid-frames

• Carbon foil mounting/inspection procedures still being optimized (water temperature, surfactant amount, mechanical equipment, storage)

• Problems obtaining Carbon Foils (bad batches, purchasing delays) • Clean-room build continuing • TDC layout still in process.• Digital board being loaded• HV Sweep board layout in process• 15kV-MCP board needs to be kitted - MCP HV multiplier from VMI

delayed - waiting on HV connectors, mechanical parts.• STATIC FPGA still in development• LVPS needs BOM and needs to be kitted, built and tested (Berg).• Analyzer and mechanical attenuator still in development

38PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN PFP SEP Status

January, 2011

Davin Larson, SEP Lead

39PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SEP Accomplishments

• DFE board being testing preamp (see picture)

• FLEX circuits delivered to Craig Tindall for mounting of ETU detectors

• DAP board fabbed (see picture) and being stuffed by digi-com

• FPGA design ready to be delivered by Jianxen Chen

• Magnets assembled into magnet cage and tested– Magnetic properties are similar to

THEMIS sensors. (discrepancy was due to misinterpretation of raw data)

• Mechanical parts have arrived. ETU#1 partially assembled

DFE

DAP

SEP EM Sensor

40PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

SEP Open issues

• Flight detector still a few weeks away so spare THEMIS detectors are being used for ETUs

41PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN PFP DCB, Power Converter & GSE Status

January 2011

Dorothy Gordon

Timothy Quinn

Peter Berg

42PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

DCB Status (1)

DCB ETU #1 Integrated with FPGA Daughter boardInitial Testing in progress

• Coldfire CORE, S/C Interface, Memory Control instantiated in the first FPGA release

• ROM Monitor Ported from RBSP– c-code test program migrated to Coldfire architecture and toolset– Allows for Peeking/Poking of DCB based Registers– Uses the Spacecraft (UART based) uplink and downlink

interfaces • Initial DMA problems resolved during the ROM Monitor port• Along with the UART, the S/C Discrete Interface has been exercised

(SIDE-SELECT, RESET and TIME)

43PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

DCB Status (2)

DCB, FPGA Daughter Board and ROM Emulator

44PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

DCB Status (3)

DCB under test with Spacecraft Simulator

45PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

PFDPU EM Chassis

46PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

GSE Hardware/Firmware Status

• MAVEN PFDPU Simulators have been shipped– Delivered MISG-GSE to LASP (LPW Team)

• connected and verified proper operation. • GSE is being used for ongoing testing.

– Delivered MISG-GSE to GSFC (MAG Team)• Connection pending availability of MAG hardware

47PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Power Converter Status

• REG board – Calculated initial (to be loaded) values for most of the REG components– First REG ETU has gone to Digicom for assembly of everything but the

magnetics (which are being wound by SSL personnel).– Reduction in power (1/5) of one of the supplies required a redesign

• A daughter board was designed to accommodate a replacement topology

• Daughter board will fit in the place of the previous and (now unpopulated) components

• Status: daughter board layout is complete and board has been received

– A successful fit check was done for the on - board connectors.

• IIB board– Layout is undergoing final checking

48PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

REG PWB

49PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

MAVEN PFP Flight Software Status

January 4 2011

Peter Harvey

50PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Status

Interface Documents Prepared/Delivered Command & Telemetry document (CTM) Discussion with LM on the SC-PFDPU interface; agreed on plan on how to use PFP

command and telemetry system which is compatible with Flight Software and MSA Reviewed new DFB specification (v 12/13) Reviewed new MAG specification Discussed MAG processing requirements with MAG team. Updates/clarification to

requirements pending Reviewed new DCB specification Reviewed new HV specification (SYS_031) Reviewing new SWEA PAD algorithm (TN_044) & example!

IV&V Processing the IV&V comments (currently 7 of 32), modifying L5 requirements

FSW Development Revised the IO module to meet revised DCB specification Developed and tested DCB diagnostic program Compiler optimization can be disabled piecemeal

some optimizations seem to conflict with hardware register access - TBR

Test Status Supporting DCB hardware tests (diagnostic program) Waiting on completion of hardware tests to start Boot code testing on DCB GSEOS/Spacecraft simulator hardware interface in work, should be ready by the time

we start Boot code test

51PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Metrics Chart

Progress Points=Telecons with GSFC. 1 pt for each telecon, 0 if the telecon did not happen.

Management Effort. Expected 10% or less, but has required phase A requirements and plans to be written in phase B.

Milestone PDRDescription Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10Product Characteristics

Project Name MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVENLanguage C C C C C C C C C

Software Domain (FSW) FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSWSLOC Expected 9180 9180 9180 9180 9180 9180 9180 9180 9180

SLOC To Date 0 0 771 1645 2841 2841 2841 2841 2841Software Progress

Major Events Planned 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0Major Events Actual 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Progress Points Planned 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Progress Points Actual 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1

Effort-Software Planned 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%Effort-Software Actual 0% 0% 24% 45% 51% 7% 7% 6% 7%

Risks (Low) 0 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4Risks (Med) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Risks (High) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Project PlanningCost/Schedule Revs Planned 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cost/Schedule Revs Actual 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0Effort-Management Planned 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Effort-Management Actual 24% 79% 37% 10% 5% 10% 7% 9% 8%Software Functionality

Requirements Planned 8.1 16.2 24.3 32.4 40.5 55.75 71Requirements Actual 0 0 19 28 51 51 51 51 57

Software QualityFSW Defect Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

non-FSW Defect Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Inspections Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Inspections Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Effort-Quality Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0

Effort-Quality Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Configuration Management

VDD Reviews Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0VDD Reviews Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CM Meetings Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CM Meetings Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Requirements ManagementRequirements Changes 0 0 2 0 1 0 12 12 43

Requirement TBDs-STATIC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Requirement TBDs-SEP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Requirement TBDs-SWIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Requirement TBDs-SWEA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Requirement TBDs-LPW 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1Requirement TBDs-MAG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Requirement TBDs-TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1Effort-Engineering 24% 0% 3% 0% 0% 3% 5% 12% 29%

Falling behind plan, but still not on critical path to EM I&T.

52PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Margin Chart

Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10DCB

Spec A D E E E E E E EPROM SIZE 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32

EEPROM SIZE 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 256FLASH TABLES 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 512

RAM SIZE 3072 3072 3072 3072 3072 3072 3072 3072 3072CPU Cycles/sec 16777216 16777216 16777216 16777216 16777216 16777216 16777216 16777216 16777216CPU Cycles/int 65536 65536 65536 65536 65536 65536 65536 65536 65536

CMD UART bps 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600TM UART bps 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600 57600

FSWVERSION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

PROM 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.44 7.46 7.46 7.46 7.46 7.46EEPROM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

FLASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03RAM 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.59 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80 14.80

CPU Cycles/4s 6710886 6710886 6710886 6710886 6710886 6710886 6710886 6710886 6710886CPU Cycles/Int 6550 6550 6550 6550 6550 6550 6550 6550 6550

CMD UART% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000TLM UART% 27000 27000 27000 27000 27000 27000 27000 27000 27000

MARGINS 50% 50% 50% 49% 48% 48% 47% 46% 45%PROM 620% 329% 329% 329% 329% 329%

EEPROM 819100% 819100% 819100% 819100% 819100% 819100%FLASH 1638300% 1638300% 1638300% 1638300% 1638300% 1638300%

RAM 46517% 20656% 20656% 20656% 20656% 20656%CPU Cycles/4s 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150%CPU Cycles/Int 901% 901% 901% 901% 901% 901% 901% 901% 901%

CMD UART% 5660% 5660% 5660% 5660% 5660% 5660% 5660% 5660% 5660%TLM UART% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113%

53PFP QSR, 1/19/2011

Fever Chart

1. FSW Requirements changes in the works2. Telemetry Specification changes in the works3. DCB ETU board currently in checkout4. DCB GSE not yet developed

BOOT Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10RequirementsSpecificationsSoftware DevelopmentTesting

OPERATIONAL Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Nov-10RequirementsSpecificationsSoftware DevelopmentTesting

LegendGreat. Ahead of ScheduleConcern about somethingProblems!