1

Performance Trend Data

ELA and MATH Grades 3-8 Aggregate Results

August 2012

2

Performance Data Grades 3-8 trend data School years … 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009 – 10*, 2010-

11, 2011-12

District results includes Out of District students

All Elementary and Middle Schools Total Population (aggregate) Performance data NOT Accountability

data

3

Performance Data Performance data … the % of all

students tested performing at a specific level

Performance Levels …Level 1 - below standardLevel 2 - meets basic standardLevel 3 - meets proficiency standardLevel 4 - exceeds proficiency

standard

4

District Aggregate Performance for Grades 3-8Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with new cut score

85.8%

91.2% 93.1%

70.2% 70.0% 69.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

70.5%

83.0%82.0%

56.7% 56.0%57.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

5

Edison ... Grades 3-5Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

92.0%97.2%96.4%

78.2%

71.7%73.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

82.9%88.9% 89.8%

58.7% 59.2%62.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

6

76.3% 79.3%

86.7%

61.8%56.4%

54.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

89.7% 92.1%98.9%

75.7%71.3% 70.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

MATHELA

Franklin Elementary ... Grades 3-5Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

7

Hamilton ... Grades 3-5 Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

88.5%90.1%95.3%

71.9%

67.5%70.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

80.9% 81.7%86.9%

54.3% 53.2%57.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

MATHELA

8

Holmes ... Grades 3-5 Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

59.6%

71.7%77.2%

41.5% 40.4%34.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

86.7%91.0% 93.8%

65.6%58.6% 58.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

MATHELA

9

Hoover Elementary ... Grades 3-5 Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

75.2%

86.1% 90.0%

68.4%

59.3%64.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

87.3%93.6%

98.3%

76.9%72.7%

76.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

10

Jefferson ... Grades 3-5 Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

88.1%94.5%

95.9%

76.6% 73.3%71.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

81.5%

89.4%89.3%

62.7%56.9%

62.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

11

Lindbergh ... Grades 3-5 Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

86.1%91.5% 92.9%

72.5%73.3%67.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

93.1%98.1%98.7%

85.9% 86.3%81.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

12

Roosevelt ... Grades 3-5 Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

74.5%70.8% 72.3%

39.3%43.3% 48.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

88.2%88.5%

84.9%

58.1%63.6%

65.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

13

Franklin Middle School … Grades 6-8Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

72.2%

82.0%78.3%

52.9%53.5%58.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

83.2%

90.2% 92.8%

68.6%73.0% 71.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

14

Hoover Middle School … Grades 6-8Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

74.4%

84.9%81.0%

55.7% 54.3%59.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

86.9%92.9% 93.8%

71.8% 68.2% 69.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

15

Kenmore Middle School … Grades 6-8Percent at Levels 3 and 4Green bar shows first year performance with the new cut score

76.9%

87.7%80.5%

59.7% 60.0%59.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

84.3%91.0% 92.5%

67.2%70.8%

68.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

ELA MATH

16

Next Steps Alignment with RTTT initiative (Common Core Learning

Standards, Data Inquiry Teams, Annual Professional Performance Review)

Instructional Improvement Plans LASW data teams and early release days Formative/Benchmark Assessments AIS RTI - Elementary Schools Curriculum Mapping continues… NY Learns Professional Development