Upload
vernon-patterson
View
217
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
New Estimates of New Estimates of Broadband Supply and Broadband Supply and DemandDemand
June 17, 2005June 17, 2005
Wei-Min Hu and James E. PriegerWei-Min Hu and James E. Prieger
Department of EconomicsDepartment of Economics
University of California, DavisUniversity of California, Davis
[email protected]@ucdavis.edu
22
Broadband Access to the InternetBroadband Access to the Internet
The Latest Dimension of the Digital The Latest Dimension of the Digital DivideDivide– U.S. Telecommunications Act of 1996: U.S. Telecommunications Act of 1996:
encourages the “reasonable and timely” encourages the “reasonable and timely” deployment of broadband to all Americans.deployment of broadband to all Americans.
– FCC has considered whether to add broadband FCC has considered whether to add broadband to the Universal Service program.to the Universal Service program.
– Therefore, the diffusion of broadband requires Therefore, the diffusion of broadband requires measurement and scrutiny.measurement and scrutiny.
33
This StudyThis Study– Examines the supply and demand sides Examines the supply and demand sides
of the end-user broadband market.of the end-user broadband market.– Uses an unexploited dataset of where Uses an unexploited dataset of where
DSL is available and where it is DSL is available and where it is subscribed to.subscribed to.
– Research Questions:Research Questions:What role do race, ethnicity, and income What role do race, ethnicity, and income
play in the supply and demand decisions?play in the supply and demand decisions?What is the role of competition in What is the role of competition in
telecommunications for broadband S&D?telecommunications for broadband S&D?
Broadband Access to the InternetBroadband Access to the Internet
44
Plan of TalkPlan of Talk
Background on Broadband Internet Background on Broadband Internet AccessAccess
Describe the DataDescribe the Data ResultsResults
– DeploymentDeployment– Demand in areas where DSL is suppliedDemand in areas where DSL is supplied
ConclusionsConclusions
55
Market Shares of Broadband Market Shares of Broadband Technologies in the U.S.Technologies in the U.S.
Residential and Small Business Broadband Lines Residential and Small Business Broadband Lines (National, 2000)(National, 2000)
66
Number of Broadband Lines
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Mil
lio
ns
of
Su
bs
cri
be
r L
ine
s
Satellite or Wireless
Fiber Optic
T1 and similar
ADSL
Cable Modem
Broadband is Increasing in the U.S.Broadband is Increasing in the U.S.
77
In 2000, Ameritech was required by In 2000, Ameritech was required by regulators to say where DSL was regulators to say where DSL was available.available.– Condition for merger approval with SBCCondition for merger approval with SBC– Ameritech lagged behind other BOCsAmeritech lagged behind other BOCs
Ameritech provided a list of their DSL Ameritech provided a list of their DSL subscribers by ZIP+4.subscribers by ZIP+4.– Data are binary: DSL is subscribed to by Data are binary: DSL is subscribed to by
at least one household in the ZIP+4 areaat least one household in the ZIP+4 area– Also know the earliest subscription date Also know the earliest subscription date
for the ZIP+4 area.for the ZIP+4 area.
The DataThe Data
88
The DataThe Data
Supplement with:Supplement with:– GIS data on ZIP+4 locationsGIS data on ZIP+4 locations– A telecommunications central office database A telecommunications central office database
(GIS)(GIS)– Census data on demographics (block level)Census data on demographics (block level)– Census data on business characteristics (ZIP Census data on business characteristics (ZIP
code level)code level)– FCC list of ZIP codes with at least one CLEC.FCC list of ZIP codes with at least one CLEC.
Eventually will add:Eventually will add:– Cable company information (cable modem)Cable company information (cable modem)– More complete CLEC informationMore complete CLEC information
99
DSL Subscribers in the Ameritech RegionDSL Subscribers in the Ameritech Region
1010
Characteristics of DSL DeploymentCharacteristics of DSL Deployment DSL is implemented in the LEC’s Central OfficeDSL is implemented in the LEC’s Central Office
– As a marketing decision, is available to all neighborhoods As a marketing decision, is available to all neighborhoods in area…in area…
– but only if they are close enough to CObut only if they are close enough to CO– Transmission speeds degrade beyond 2.2 miles.Transmission speeds degrade beyond 2.2 miles.
Ameritech clearly had 1.5 miles as a thresholdAmeritech clearly had 1.5 miles as a threshold
The distance threshold is clearly visible:The distance threshold is clearly visible:
Distribution of DSL Deployment Distance
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
0 1 2 3 4 5miles
1111
DSL Diffusion DSL Diffusion in Illinois: in Illinois:
April 1999April 1999
1212
DSL Diffusion DSL Diffusion in Illinois: in Illinois:
June 1999June 1999
1313
DSL Diffusion DSL Diffusion in Illinois: in Illinois:
August 1999August 1999
1414
DSL Diffusion DSL Diffusion in Illinois: in Illinois:
Oct. 1999Oct. 1999
1515
DSL Diffusion DSL Diffusion in Illinois: in Illinois:
Dec. 1999Dec. 1999
1616
DSL Diffusion DSL Diffusion in Illinois: in Illinois:
Feb. 2000Feb. 2000
1717
Implications for Supply and Implications for Supply and Demand EstimationsDemand Estimations
Deployment decision:Deployment decision:– The marketing characteristics of the whole The marketing characteristics of the whole
central office area aren’t relevant, just a central office area aren’t relevant, just a subset.subset.
Demand decision:Demand decision:– Need to restrict attention to households Need to restrict attention to households
within 1.5 miles of the central office.within 1.5 miles of the central office. This matters most in non-urban COsThis matters most in non-urban COs
1818
Estimation Strategy – Supply SideEstimation Strategy – Supply Side
Unit of decision-making: central Unit of decision-making: central office area.office area.
Universe: Ameritech central offices Universe: Ameritech central offices in the five state regionin the five state region
Model DSL availability as a probit Model DSL availability as a probit regression on area characteristics.regression on area characteristics.
1919
Results of Deployment ProbitsResults of Deployment ProbitsEstimation 1
Race Estimation 2
Race and Income
Variable Coefficient Marginal Effect Coefficient Marginal
Effect Race and Ethnicity
% Asian 13.030*** 0.621 7.408** 0.155 % Black -0.701** -0.033 1.199*** 0.025 % Native American -127.046*** -6.057 -19.546 -0.410 % Other -13.682** -0.652 2.192 0.046 % Hispanic 8.591*** 0.410 -0.219 -0.005
Income and Poverty Income (log) 2.227*** 0.047 % in poverty -0.269 -0.006
Size of Market Households (log) 0.216** 0.010 0.157 0.003 Pop. density (log) 0.692*** 0.033 0.852*** 0.018
Intercept -7.364*** -33.406*** Log Likelihood -264.793 -220.818 N 1,120 1,119 Pseudo R2 0.490 0.575
* significant at the 10% level; ** significant at the 5% level; *** significant at the 1% level.
2020
When add all variables (estimation 4):When add all variables (estimation 4):– No race or income (!) variables are No race or income (!) variables are
significantsignificant– CLEC presence: no significant effectCLEC presence: no significant effect– Commuting: Commuting:
Work at home: +Work at home: +Longer commute: + (except longest group)Longer commute: + (except longest group)
– Cost variablesCost variablesPopulation density + / Rural –Population density + / Rural –Phone density +Phone density +Structure Age (proxy for age of network Structure Age (proxy for age of network
infrastructure): - (at least above median)infrastructure): - (at least above median)
Results of Deployment ProbitsResults of Deployment Probits
2121
Unit of Observation isUnit of Observation is Census block Census block – Y=1 if any of the DSL ZIP+4’s fall into that blockY=1 if any of the DSL ZIP+4’s fall into that block– So at least on household or business subscribes in So at least on household or business subscribes in
the blockthe block– Include blocks within 1.5 miles of a CO in which DSL Include blocks within 1.5 miles of a CO in which DSL
is deployed.is deployed.
Estimation Strategy: Demand SideEstimation Strategy: Demand Side
2222
Estimation Strategy: Demand SideEstimation Strategy: Demand Side
The demand decision is a function of the The demand decision is a function of the utility of the relevant optionsutility of the relevant options
DSL:DSL: UUDSLDSL = = DSLDSL’x+’x+DSLDSL
No DSL:No DSL: UU00 = =
– The “outside option” has to stand in for dial-The “outside option” has to stand in for dial-up, cable modem, and no access.up, cable modem, and no access.
– Household subscribes to DSL if it gives the Household subscribes to DSL if it gives the most utility:most utility: UUDSLDSL > 0> 0
2323
Specify Specify DSLDSL as standard normal: probit binary as standard normal: probit binary choice model choice model
Then Prob(at least one HH in ZIP+4 area Then Prob(at least one HH in ZIP+4 area jj has has DSL) isDSL) is
where where PPii is is (-(-’x’x). ). Do not observe HH demographics, so assign Do not observe HH demographics, so assign
Census block average to all HH in block.Census block average to all HH in block. Do MLE.Do MLE.
jN
iij PP
1
11
Estimation Strategy: Demand SideEstimation Strategy: Demand Side
2424
Results of Demand EstimationsResults of Demand EstimationsEstimation 1
Race and Income Estimation 2
Race, Income, and Distance
Estimation 3 Race, Income, Distance, & FE
Variable Coefficient Marginal Effect Coefficient Marginal
Effect Coefficient Marginal Effect
Race and Ethnicity
% Asian -1.082*** -0.140 -1.159*** -0.194 -0.432*** -0.087 % Black 0.039*** 0.005 0.126*** 0.021 0.036 0.007 % Other Race 0.078** 0.010 0.206*** 0.035 0.409*** 0.082 % Hispanic -0.124*** -0.016 -0.117*** -0.020 -0.263*** -0.053
Income and Poverty Income (log) 0.104*** 0.014 0.047*** 0.008 0.209*** 0.042 HH Poverty Rate -0.026*** -0.003 -0.061*** -0.010 0.001 0.000
Distance from CO -1.032*** -0.174 -1.701*** -0.341 Intercept -2.659*** -1.058*** -2.228*** Central Office Fixed Effects Not included Not included Included
Log Likelihood -32,500.37 -26,063.34 -19,583.08 N 51,797 51,797 51,797 Pseudo R2 0.021 0.216 0.410
* significant at the 10% level; ** significant at the 5% level; *** significant at the 1% level.
2525
Results of Demand EstimationsResults of Demand Estimations
When add all variables:When add all variables:– CLEC present: demand down 2.2 % ptsCLEC present: demand down 2.2 % pts
– Asians & Hispanics (not Blacks): -Asians & Hispanics (not Blacks): -– Income: +Income: +– Household size: +Household size: +– Distance from CO: - Distance from CO: -
2626
Diffusion Curve over TimeDiffusion Curve over Time The coefficient on time since DSL deployed in the The coefficient on time since DSL deployed in the
area implies a diffusion curve:area implies a diffusion curve:
0.1
0.105
0.11
0.115
0.12
0.125
0.13
0 1 2 3 4 5
Years Since DSL Deployment
Pro
ba
bili
ty o
f H
ou
se
ho
ld D
SL
A
do
pti
on
2727
Business DemandBusiness Demand A limitation of the structural demand A limitation of the structural demand
model: all demand assumed from HHmodel: all demand assumed from HH Businesses account for 20% of DSLBusinesses account for 20% of DSL Do not know how many firms are in Do not know how many firms are in
Census block areaCensus block area Solution: switch to reduced form probitsSolution: switch to reduced form probits Business variables appear to matterBusiness variables appear to matter
– % in NAICS categories% in NAICS categories– Size of businessesSize of businesses
2828
ConclusionsConclusions
1.1. This is an interesting, unique dataset to This is an interesting, unique dataset to explore.explore.
2.2. Neither race nor income matters in supplyNeither race nor income matters in supply– Interesting, given the regulators’ concerns!Interesting, given the regulators’ concerns!
3.3. Race matters and income matter in demand Race matters and income matter in demand estimations.estimations.– Asians, Hispanics, and other races have less DAsians, Hispanics, and other races have less D
4.4. Competition from CLECs doesn’t significantly Competition from CLECs doesn’t significantly affect deployment decision.affect deployment decision.
5.5. Competition from CLECs reduces demand for Competition from CLECs reduces demand for incumbent’s product.incumbent’s product.