32
1 Multilingual Writing Students: Opportunities and Challenges Kate Mangelsdorf Evelyn Posey October 20, 2010

1 Multilingual Writing Students: Opportunities and Challenges Kate Mangelsdorf Evelyn Posey October 20, 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Multilingual Writing Students: Opportunities and Challenges

Kate MangelsdorfEvelyn Posey

October 20, 2010

2

Who are Multilingual Writers?

International Students Speak two or more languages Learned English in native countries Take English-as-a-Second-Language

courses (ESOL) Plan to leave the U.S. after graduation,

or Transnational

3

Who Are Multilingual Writers?

U.S. resident/immigrant/heritage language students (Generation 1.5)

Bilingual (speech) Do not self-identify as ESL students Attended U.S. high schools Take first-year composition in the English

Dept. Plan to remain in U.S. or Transnational

4

Terminology L1 = “first” language L2 = “second” language ELL = English Language Learner ESL = English as a Second Language Bilingual, multilingual

Terminology inadequate for language dynamics

Multilingual Student Writers . . .

Help us understand the globalized world Prepare L1 students for the global workforce

5

6

Second Language Acquisition

Non-linear process Back-and-forth mastery of linguistic

features Mastery in one communicative context

might not transfer to another Learn from mistakes Approximation of target language

7

Second Language Acquisition

Gradual process Years of study and practice Exposure to target language Not all skills develop simultaneously Very fluent second-language learners will

have “accents” in writing

8

Second Language Acquisition

Identity negotiation Language = self Cultural affiliations Multiple roles Dynamic, shifting English is colonizing language

9

L2 Writing Students

Writing Processes (Compared to L1) Spend less time planning Produce shorter texts Spend more time revising Focus more on grammar Worry more Take more time to write Take more time to read

10

L2 Writing Students

Writing Processes Greater metalinguistic awareness Broader perspective / experiences Skilled at shifting roles and identities Tacit knowledge about language usage Familiar with grammatical terms

11

L2 Writing Students

Cultural Differences from L1 Collectivist cultures: texts belong to

the group Different beliefs about documenting

sources Less emphasis on “originality”

12

L2 Writing Students

Rhetorical Differences U.S. English: The writer is responsible

for communicating meaning Other languages: Readers bear more

responsibility for understanding texts

Teaching Strategies

Writing Assignments Vocabulary Commenting on

student writing

13

14

Teaching Strategies

Creating Writing Assignments Describe audience expectations Explain how to structure the text Suggest headings and subheadings,

when appropriate Show how to cite and document Give examples Define your terms (i.e., faculty often

define “analysis” differently)

15

Teaching Strategies

Vocabulary Give examples of words and phrases that

will be used in specific assignments Write out terms Give examples of formulaic academic

language (e.g., according to …, it is well known that…, as previous research has shown …, other scholars have noted …)

Refer students to English Learners’ Dictionary

16

Teaching Strategies

Responding to Student Writing Respond to content

as well as form Be positive When focusing on

errors, look for patterns

17

Teaching Strategies

“Treatable” errors—rule governed Subject-verb agreement Verb tense Verb formation Word order Singular/plural nouns Articles

18

Teaching Strategies

“Less treatable” errors Inappropriate word choices Idioms Prepositions Count vs. noncount nouns (apple =

count, advice = noncount) Articles

19

Teaching Strategies

Direct feedback Instructor provides the correction for the

student

Indirect feedback Instructor indicates an error has been

made but the student makes the correction

20

Teaching Strategies What does the research show?*

Grammar instruction works ONLY if students immediately apply it to their own writing

Indirect feedback much more effective than direct feedback on treatable errors (indicate an error in margin, ask student to correct)

Direct feedback effective for less treatable errors Offer explicit comments

Dana Ferris, Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students (Routledge, 2003)

Teaching L2 Students Compared to L1 Students More varied input of the target language More modeling of language and structures

Suggest thesis sentences, topic sentences, transitions, word groups

More focus on vocabularyModel lexical phrases and language chunks

21

Technology and L2 Writers - Overview

Why use technology Available tools Collaborative learning Acceleration of student progress How to do it better

Why Use Technology with L2 Writers

Accessibility 24/7 A sense of writing community Focused reading and writing Consistent and customized feedback Mastery of linguistic features Target language approximation

Why Not to Use Technology

Not available to all Can be expensive Rapid change in knowledge

base Lack of good instructional

design Perception that it creates

hurdles for L2 writers

Critical Literacy

Language is subject of classroom

Examination of literacies in various settings

Race, gender, class issues

Online Learning: Technology

Asynchronous tools Announcements Discussion boards E-mail Tech support

Online Learning: Technology

Synchronous tools Live chat Instant message White boards Who’s online

Collaborative Learning

Past Experience Small group interactions Peer reviews

Innovation Clustered classes Stanford’s Cross-cultural

Rhetoric Project

Technology and Collaboration

Innovation Blogs, Wikis, Social media sites

Technology and Acceleration

Past Experience Online writing labs Grammar exercises

Innovation mycomplab

How to Do It Even Better

Meaningful goals and objectives Learning by doing Extensive feedback Expert models Judicial use of multimedia Sharing best practices

Contact us

Kate [email protected]

Evelyn [email protected]