219
1 Management in Healthcare Rami Gharaibeh ©

1 Management in Healthcare Rami Gharaibeh ©. 2 Chapter 1 Rami Gharaibeh © Gaining a Competitive Advantage

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • 1 Management in Healthcare Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 2
  • 2 Chapter 1 Rami Gharaibeh Gaining a Competitive Advantage
  • Slide 3
  • 3 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Introduction Core competency refers to fundamental knowledge, ability, or expertise in a specific subject area or skill set. It defines what a firm does best. Core competency for Mercedes is car manufacturing, for McDonalds is fast food serving, for JUST is teaching, etc. Firms with similar core competency form an industry and they become rivals of each other
  • Slide 4
  • 4 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Introduction Competitive advantage refers to a companys ability to maintain and gain market share in its industry. Ex., safety is a competitive advantage for Volvo
  • Slide 5
  • 5 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh How is the HRM Function Changing? IT is allowing firms to utilize two concepts, which in turn is affecting HRM Self-service refers to providing internal or external customers online access to information thus allowing them to serve themselves Outsourcing refers to the practice of having another company provide services
  • Slide 6
  • 6 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Three competitive challenges that companies now face will increase the importance of HRM practices: The Global Challenge The Challenge of Sustainability The Technology Challenge
  • Slide 7
  • 7 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Sustainability refers to the ability of a company to survive and succeed in a dynamic competitive environment Stakeholders refers to shareholders, the community, customers, and all other parties that have an interest in seeing that the company succeeds
  • Slide 8
  • 8 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Sustainability includes the ability to: deal with economic and social changes, engage in responsible and ethical business practices, provide high quality products and services, and put in place methods to determine if the company is meeting stakeholders needs.
  • Slide 9
  • 9 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Knowledge is becoming more valuable Intellectual capital refers to the creativity, productivity, and service provided by employees Knowledge workers are employees who contribute to the company not through manual labor but through a specialized body of knowledge Empowerment means giving employees responsibility and authority to make decisions regarding all aspects of product development or customer service
  • Slide 10
  • 10 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Organizational learning refers to the process of adaptation to environmental changes. Adaptation involves learning and changing behavior accordingly A learning organization refers to the an organization that performs organizational learning at a high frequency
  • Slide 11
  • 11 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Companies are finding that to survive they must compete in international markets as well as fend off foreign corporations attempts to gain ground in the U.S. Every business must be prepared to deal with the global economy. This is made easier by technology.
  • Slide 12
  • 12 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Technology has reshaped the way we play, plan our lives, and where we work The overall impact of the Internet The Internet has created a new business model e- commerce in which business transactions and relationships can be conducted electronically.
  • Slide 13
  • 13 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Advances in technology have: changed how and where we work, resulted in high-performance models of work systems, increased the use of teams to improve customer service and product quality, changed skill requirements, increased working partnerships
  • Slide 14
  • 14 Chapter 2 Rami Gharaibeh Strategic Human Resource Management
  • Slide 15
  • 15 Definition Rami Gharaibeh What is Strategic Management Strategic Management is a process for analyzing a company's competitive situation, developing the company's strategic goals, and devising a plan of action and allocation of resources that will help a company achieve its goals. Strategic human resource management is the pattern of planned human resource deployments and activities intended to enable an organization to achieve its goals.
  • Slide 16
  • 16 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Components of Strategic Management Process Strategy Formulation Strategy Implementation
  • Slide 17
  • 17 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Strategy Formulation using the mission statement as their framework, the Strategic planning team will use their vision to run SWOT analysis. The results of the SWOT analysis is information that will be used to formulate the organizational goals. the team will then determine the organizational strategy and the strategy will imply the HR needs
  • Slide 18
  • 18 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Strategy Formulation The SWOT analysis includes: External analysis: identifying opportunities & threats Internal analysis: identifying strengths and weaknesses
  • Slide 19
  • 19 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Strategy Implementation This includes structuring the organization, allocating resources, ensuring that the firm has skilled employees in place, and developing reward systems that align employee behavior with the strategic goals. Strategy implementation includes all HR practices
  • Slide 20
  • 20 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Strategic Choice HR Practices Recruiting, Training, Performance management, Labor relations, Employee relations, Job analysis Job design, Selection, Development, Pay structure, Incentives, Benefits Firm Performance Productivity, Quality, Profitability Human Resource Actions Behaviors, Results Human Resource Capability Skills, Abilities, Knowledge Human Resource Needs Skills Behavior Culture Mission Goals Internal Analysis Strengths Weaknesses External Analysis Opportunities Threats Strategy Formulation Strategy Implementation
  • Slide 21
  • 21 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh VisionMission Strategic Choice Internal analysis Strengths Weaknesses External analysis Opportunities Threats Goals SWOT analysis feedback
  • Slide 22
  • 22 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges HR Practices Job analysis Job design Recruiting Selection Training Performance management Development Firm Performance Productivity, Quality, Profitability Human Resource Actions Behaviors, Results Human Resource Capability Skills, Abilities, Knowledge Human Resource Needs Skills Behavior Culture Level of utilization Level of Goal achievement feedback
  • Slide 23
  • 23 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Five components of the strategic management process: A mission is a statement of the organization's reasons for being. Goals are what the organization hopes to achieve in the medium-to long-term future External analysis consists of examining the organization's operating environment to identify strategic opportunities and threats. Internal analysis attempts to identify the organization's strengths and weaknesses. Strategic choice is the organization's strategy, which describes the ways the organization will attempt to fulfill its mission and achieve its long term goals.
  • Slide 24
  • 24 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges Job Analysis: the process of getting detailed information about jobs. Job design: making decisions about what tasks should be grouped into a particular job. Recruitment: the process through which the organization seeks applicants. Selection: identifying the applicants with the appropriate knowledge, skills, and ability. Training: a planned effort to facilitate learning of job-related knowledge, skills, and behavior. Performance management: helps ensure that employees activities and outcomes are congruent with the organizations objectives. Development: the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and behavior that improves employees' ability to meet the challenges of future jobs.
  • Slide 25
  • 25 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges
  • Slide 26
  • 26 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges
  • Slide 27
  • 27 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges
  • Slide 28
  • 28 Important Terms Rami Gharaibeh Competitive Challenges
  • Slide 29
  • 29 Chapter 3 Rami Gharaibeh Job Analysis & Design
  • Slide 30
  • 30 Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Importance Job analysis is central to all other HR activities
  • Slide 31
  • 31 Importance. Job Analysis Job Design HR Planning Recruitment Selection Performance Management Training & Development Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 32
  • 32 What is Job analysis It is about obtaining two types of information. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Job Description Job Specifications
  • Slide 33
  • 33 Job Description Provides information on job TDR. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Duties Tasks Responsibilities
  • Slide 34
  • 34 Job Description Provides information on job TDR. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Duty 1 Task 1 R1 Task 2Task 3 R2R3R2R1 R2R3R4 Duty 2 Task 1 R1 Task 2 R2R3R2R1R4R5R6R7
  • Slide 35
  • 35 Job Description Example Job Title: Maintenance Mechanic 1. Duty 1 (40% of job time) Maintenance of Equipment 2. Duty 2 (40% of job time) Repair of Equipment 3. Duty 3 (10% of job time) Testing and Approval 4. Duty 4 (10% of job time) Maintain Stock. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 36
  • 36 Job Description Example Job Title: Maintenance Mechanic. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Duty 1: Maintenance of Equipment (40%) maintain log of all maintenance activities Replace parts & fluids Check for deviances Prevent unauthorized access Store safely Follow Manufacturers manual Use calibrated instruments Follow Manufacturers manual
  • Slide 37
  • 37 Job Description Example Job Title: Maintenance Mechanic. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Duty 2: Repair of Equipment (40%)
  • Slide 38
  • 38 Job Description Example Job Title: Maintenance Mechanic. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Duty 3: Testing & Approval (10%)
  • Slide 39
  • 39 Job Description Example Job Title: Maintenance Mechanic. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Duty 4: Maintain Stock (10%)
  • Slide 40
  • 40 Job Specifications Is the answer to the question What are the specifications a person should have in order to be able to perform the TDRs of the job?. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 41
  • 41 Job Specifications The specifications of a person are described as his/her KSAOs. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Knowledge Skills Abilities Others (mainly traits)
  • Slide 42
  • 42 Knowledge factual or procedural information that is necessary for successfully performing a particular task Example A surgeon knows the procedure to remove a diagnosed cancer. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 43
  • 43 Skills an individuals level of proficiency at performing a particular task Example two surgeons (A and B) know the procedure to remove a diagnosed cancer, yet A is more skillful than B. this means that the success rate of the operation when carried out by A is higher.. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 44
  • 44 Abilities refers to a more general enduring capability that an individual possesses. Example surgeon A has the following abilities: high arm-hand steadiness, fast reaction time and high level of finger dexterity.. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 45
  • 45 Traits a characteristic feature or quality distinguishing a particular person Example surgeon A is compassionate, less greedy, cooperative, eager to learn and inquisitive.. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 46
  • 46 Sources of Information The posed question is Who is able to provide information on a job s TDRs and KSAOs?. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 47
  • 47 Sources of Information The answer is Subject Matter Experts (SME) Any job has two types of SMEs. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh - The individuals who experienced the nature of the job - The individuals who supervised similar jobs
  • Slide 48
  • 48 Sources of Information Example of SMEs To analyze the job of a nurse, the SMEs are. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh - a nurse - a chief nurse or a doctor
  • Slide 49
  • 49 Methods for Obtaining Information The posed question is How do we obtain the information from SMEs?. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 50
  • 50 Methods for Obtaining Information The answer is, by using one or more of these four methods. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) Task Analysis Inventory Fleishman Analysis System (FJAS) Occupational Information Network (O*NET) )
  • Slide 51
  • 51 Position Analysis Questionnaire A standardized job analysis questionnaire containing 194 items. These items are grouped into six sections: Information input Mental processes Work output Relationships with other persons Job context Other characteristics. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 52
  • 52 Position Analysis Questionnaire Advantages: Can be generalized across a wide variety of jobs Allows for comparisons across jobs It covers: work context, input, output and processes.. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 53
  • 53 Position Analysis Questionnaire Disadvantages: Valid completion of PAQ requires training. It is not ideal for developing job descriptions because of its generalizability.. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 54
  • 54 Task Analysis Inventory Focuses on analyzing all the tasks performed in the focal job. Generate a list of tasks Rate each task on several dimensions: Amount of time required Frequency of tasks Relative importance Relative difficulty. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 55
  • 55 Flieshman Analysis System This system is based on a taxonomy of abilities that adequately represent all the dimensions relevant to work. The taxonomy includes 52 cognitive, psychomotor, physical and sensory abilities.. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 56
  • 56 Occupational Information Network Dictionary of occupational titles Helping public employment system in linking demand for skills with supply for skills. It included 12,000 jobs. Updated in 1998 to O*NET. http://Online.onetcenter.org. Job Analysis Rami Gharaibeh
  • Slide 57
  • 57 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design What is Job Design In case of a new job title, then job design means to describe the jobs TDRs and KSAOs In case of revising a current job, then we will be carrying out a job redesign. This involves modifying the current TDRs and KSAOs.
  • Slide 58
  • 58 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Business sector Job analyst/designer Job analysis New firm Job design Enter business
  • Slide 59
  • 59 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design The analyst/designer will obtain information on TDRs and KSAOs and generate information on TDRs and KSAOs The output is guided by the input but is not a replicate of it. The firms strategy and competitive advantage will affect its job design
  • Slide 60
  • 60 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design when designing a job, the designer will follow one of these approaches mechanistic approach motivational approach biological approach
  • Slide 61
  • 61 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Mechanistic Approach Has its roots in classical industrial engineering. Focuses on designing jobs around the concepts of task specialization, skill simplification, and repetition. Scientific management, one of the earliest mechanistic approaches, sought to identify the one best way to perform the job through the use of time-and-motion studies.
  • Slide 62
  • 62 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Mechanistic Approach The scientific management approach was built upon in later years and resulted in a mechanistic approach that calls for the job to be designed very simply. New employees can be trained to perform the job quickly and inexpensively.
  • Slide 63
  • 63 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Motivational Approach The motivational approach to job design focuses on the job characteristics that affect the psychological meaning and motivational potential of job design. A focus on increasing job complexity through job enlargement, job enrichment, and the construction of jobs around sociotechnical systems. A model of how job design affects employee reaction is the Job Characteristics Model.
  • Slide 64
  • 64 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Motivational Approach Core Job Dimensions Skill Variety Task Identity Task Significance Autonomy Feedback Psychological States Meaningful Work Responsibility for Outcome Knowledge of Results Work Outcomes High Motivation High Quality of Work High Satisfaction Low Absenteeism and Turnover
  • Slide 65
  • 65 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Biological Approach Comes primarily from the sciences of biomechanics, or the study of body movements Is referred to as ergonomics, or the concern with examining the interface between individuals' physiological characteristics and the physical work environment. The goal of this approach is to minimize the physical strain on the worker by structuring the physical work environment around the way the body works. Focuses on outcomes such as physical fatigue, aches and pains, and health complaints.
  • Slide 66
  • 66 Rami Gharaibeh Job Design Job Design Approach Positive Outcomes Negative Outcomes Motivational Mechanistic Biological Perceptual-Motor Higher job satisfaction Higher motivation Greater job involvement Lower absenteeism Decreased training time Higher utilization levels Lower likelihood of error Less chance of mental overload and stress Less physical effort Less physical fatigue Fewer health complaints Fewer medical incidences Lower absenteeism Higher job satisfaction Lower likelihood of error Lower likelihood of accidents Less chance of mental overload and stress Lower training time Higher utilization levels Increased training time Lower utilization levels Greater likelihood of error Greater chance of mental overload and stress Lower job satisfaction Lower motivation Higher absenteeism Higher financial costs because of changes in equipment or job environment Lower job satisfaction Lower motivation
  • Slide 67
  • 67 Chapter 4 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management
  • Slide 68
  • 68 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Definitions Performance management is the process through which managers ensure that employee activities and outputs are congruent with the organization's goals
  • Slide 69
  • 69 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Definitions Performance Appraisal is the process through which an organization gets information on how well an employee is doing his or her job
  • Slide 70
  • 70 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Definitions Performance Feedback is the process of providing employees information regarding their performance effectiveness
  • Slide 71
  • 71 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Administrative Decisions Performance management
  • Slide 72
  • 72 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Administrative Decisions Employee A Low communication skills First round of appraisal
  • Slide 73
  • 73 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Decision to enroll A in training session Administrative Decisions Employee A Low communication skills
  • Slide 74
  • 74 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Decision to enroll A in training session Administrative Decisions Second round of appraisal
  • Slide 75
  • 75 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Administrative Decisions STILL Low communication skills Second round of appraisal
  • Slide 76
  • 76 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Decision to issue punishment STILL Low communication skills
  • Slide 77
  • 77 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Administrative Decisions Third round of appraisal
  • Slide 78
  • 78 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Administrative Decisions STILL Low communication skills
  • Slide 79
  • 79 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Management Why Performance Management Strategic Decisions Developmental Decisions Decision to lay off Employee A STILL Low communication skills
  • Slide 80
  • 80 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal Instruments These are the instruments used to measure the performance of employees In many occasions these instruments are simple forms containing may be 10 questions which a manager has to fill out
  • Slide 81
  • 81 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal Instruments Are the results of these instruments dependable? If not, then all decisions based on these results are wrong How do we know that our instruments are useful?
  • Slide 82
  • 82 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal Instruments Appraisal instruments have to come high on four criteria Reliability Validity Specificity Acceptability
  • Slide 83
  • 83 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Reliability Reliability is the consistency of your measurement, or the degree to which an instrument measures the same way each time it is used under the same condition with the same subjects. In short, it is the repeatability of your measurement. A measure is considered reliable if a person's score on the same test given twice is similar.
  • Slide 84
  • 84 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Reliability The concept of random error is closely related to the concept of precision The higher the precision of a measurement instrument, the smaller the variability of the fluctuations in its readings..
  • Slide 85
  • 85 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Validity A valid measure is one that measures what it is intended to measure
  • Slide 86
  • 86 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Validity Best available approximation to the truth or falsity of a given inference, proposition or conclusion Cook and Campbell (1979) In short, were we right?
  • Slide 87
  • 87 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Specificity The extent to which a performance measure gives detailed guidance to employees about what is expected of them and how they can meet these expectations
  • Slide 88
  • 88 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Acceptability The extent to which a performance measure is deemed to be satisfactory or adequate by those who use it
  • Slide 89
  • 89 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Acceptability Acceptability has to be considered on the side of the employee as well as on the side of the manager
  • Slide 90
  • 90 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal What Are We Appraising? We are appraising the employees level in performing his/her TDRs Since the TDRs are linked to the KSAOs, then a low score in TDRs would hint a weakness in KSAOs
  • Slide 91
  • 91 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal KSAOs TDRs InputPerformance Processes Product/ service Apply them in To produce What Are We Appraising?
  • Slide 92
  • 92 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal What Are We Appraising? KSAOs TDRs Appraisal instrument InputPerformance Processes Product/ service Apply them in To produce measure compare Reference
  • Slide 93
  • 93 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal What Are We Appraising? KSAOs TDRs Appraisal instrument InputPerformance Processes Product/ service Apply them in To produce reference performance Negative performance reveals
  • Slide 94
  • 94 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal What Are We Appraising? KSAOs TDRs Appraisal instrument InputPerformance Processes Product/ service Apply them in To produce reference performance Negative performance reveals Because of low
  • Slide 95
  • 95 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal What Are We Appraising? Appraisal instrument InputPerformance Processes Apply them in To produce KSAOs TDRs Product/ service links
  • Slide 96
  • 96 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal How Do We Design an Instrument? Since each job has its own KSAOs then it is logical to think of a customized performance appraisal instrument for each job
  • Slide 97
  • 97 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal How Do We Design an Instrument? There are five approaches Comparative Attribute Behavioral Result Quality
  • Slide 98
  • 98 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Four techniques within this approach Simple ranking Alternation ranking Forced distribution Paired comparison
  • Slide 99
  • 99 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks performances from highest to lowest
  • Slide 100
  • 100 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking KSAOs TDRs Product/ service Employee A
  • Slide 101
  • 101 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking KSAOs TDRs Product/ service KSAOs TDRs Employee A Employee B Product/ service
  • Slide 102
  • 102 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking KSAOs TDRs Product/ service KSAOs TDRs Product/ service KSAOs TDRs Product/ service Employee A Employee B Employee C Product/ service Product/ service
  • Slide 103
  • 103 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking KSAOs TDRs Product/ service KSAOs TDRs Product/ service KSAOs TDRs Product/ service Employee A Employee B Employee C Product/ service Product/ service KSAOs TDRs Product/ service Product/ service Employee D
  • Slide 104
  • 104 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Employees Performances
  • Slide 105
  • 105 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest Employees Appraisal High performance Low performance
  • Slide 106
  • 106 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance What about Reliability?
  • Slide 107
  • 107 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance Can you arrange the colors in the same order in every trial?
  • Slide 108
  • 108 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance If not, then reliability is low
  • Slide 109
  • 109 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance What about validity?
  • Slide 110
  • 110 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance Even if you always come up with the same order of colors, is this order indeed the RIGHT ORDER?
  • Slide 111
  • 111 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance If not, then low validity
  • Slide 112
  • 112 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance What about specificity?
  • Slide 113
  • 113 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance Does this ordering tell any employee what he needs to do in order to move up?
  • Slide 114
  • 114 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance It does not, so low specificity
  • Slide 115
  • 115 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance What about acceptability?
  • Slide 116
  • 116 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance Because low reliability, low validity, low specificity then low acceptability
  • Slide 117
  • 117 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Simple ranking Ranks from highest to lowest High performance Low performance Still, managers accept it because it is simple
  • Slide 118
  • 118 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees Employees Appraisal BestWorst
  • Slide 119
  • 119 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees Employees Appraisal BestWorst
  • Slide 120
  • 120 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees Employees Appraisal BestWorst
  • Slide 121
  • 121 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees Employees Appraisal BestWorst
  • Slide 122
  • 122 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees BestWorst
  • Slide 123
  • 123 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance
  • Slide 124
  • 124 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance What about Reliability?
  • Slide 125
  • 125 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance It is improved
  • Slide 126
  • 126 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance What about validity?
  • Slide 127
  • 127 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance It is improved
  • Slide 128
  • 128 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance What about specificity?
  • Slide 129
  • 129 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance Not changed
  • Slide 130
  • 130 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance What about acceptability?
  • Slide 131
  • 131 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Alternation ranking Crossing off best and worst employees High performance Low performance Not changed
  • Slide 132
  • 132 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups Employees
  • Slide 133
  • 133 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups Employees Appraisal High performance Low performance
  • Slide 134
  • 134 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups Employees Appraisal High performance Low performance
  • Slide 135
  • 135 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance What about reliability?
  • Slide 136
  • 136 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance More improvement
  • Slide 137
  • 137 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance What about validity?
  • Slide 138
  • 138 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance More improvement
  • Slide 139
  • 139 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance What about specificity?
  • Slide 140
  • 140 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance Not changed
  • Slide 141
  • 141 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance What about acceptability?
  • Slide 142
  • 142 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Forced distribution Employees are ranked in groups High performance Low performance Not changed
  • Slide 143
  • 143 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Paired comparison Managers compare every employee with every other employee in the work group
  • Slide 144
  • 144 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach 0000 1111 0001 1101 0101 21304 result
  • Slide 145
  • 145 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach 0000 1111 0001 1101 0101 21304 result Appraisal
  • Slide 146
  • 146 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach What about reliability?
  • Slide 147
  • 147 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach More improvement
  • Slide 148
  • 148 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach What about validity?
  • Slide 149
  • 149 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach More improvement
  • Slide 150
  • 150 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach What about specificity?
  • Slide 151
  • 151 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Not changed
  • Slide 152
  • 152 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach What about acceptability?
  • Slide 153
  • 153 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Comparative Approach Not changed
  • Slide 154
  • 154 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Two techniques within this approach Graphic Rating Scale (GRS) Mixed Rating Scale (MRS)
  • Slide 155
  • 155 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale A list of traits is evaluated by a five-point rating scale
  • Slide 156
  • 156 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery goodexcellentdistinguished 12345 Team work 12345 Creativity 12345 Initiative 12345 communication
  • Slide 157
  • 157 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery goodexcellentdistinguished 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A
  • Slide 158
  • 158 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery good excelle nt distinguish ed 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A What about reliability?
  • Slide 159
  • 159 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery good excelle nt distinguish ed 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A More improvement
  • Slide 160
  • 160 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery good excelle nt distinguish ed 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A What about validity?
  • Slide 161
  • 161 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery good excelle nt distinguish ed 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A More improvement
  • Slide 162
  • 162 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery good excelle nt distinguish ed 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A What about specificity? More improvement
  • Slide 163
  • 163 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Graphic Rating Scale pooradequateVery good excelle nt distinguish ed 12345Team work 12345Creativity 12345Initiative 12345communication Employee A What about acceptability? More improvement
  • Slide 164
  • 164 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale Define relevant performance dimensions and then develop statements representing good, average, and poor performance along each dimension
  • Slide 165
  • 165 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale pooradequateVery goodexcellentdistinguished 12345 Team work 12345 Intelligence 12345 Initiative 12345 Relations with
  • Slide 166
  • 166 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Initiative Three statements describing three levels of initiative
  • Slide 167
  • 167 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Initiative Three statements describing three levels of initiative this employee is a real self-starter. The employee always takes the initiative and his superior never has to prod him
  • Slide 168
  • 168 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Initiative Three statements describing three levels of initiative this employee is a real self-starter. The employee always takes the initiative and his superior never has to prod him while generally this employee shows initiative, occasionally his superior must prod him to complete work
  • Slide 169
  • 169 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Initiative Three statements describing three levels of initiative this employee is a real self-starter. The employee always takes the initiative and his superior never has to prod him while generally this employee shows initiative, occasionally his superior must prod him to complete work this employee has a bit of tendency to sit around and wait for directions
  • Slide 170
  • 170 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Intelligence Three statements describing three levels of intelligence
  • Slide 171
  • 171 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Intelligence Three statements describing three levels of intelligence this employee is extremely intelligent, and he learns very rapidly while perhaps this employee is not a genius, he is a lot more Intelligent than many people I know although this employee is slower than some in understanding things, And may take a bit longer in learning new things, he is of average intelligence
  • Slide 172
  • 172 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale this employee is extremely intelligent, and he learns very rapidly INT H while generally this employee shows initiative, occasionally his superior must prod him to complete work INIT M while perhaps this employee is not a genius, he is a lot more Intelligent than many people I know INT M this employee has a bit of tendency to sit around and wait for directions INIT L although this employee is slower than some in understanding things, And may take a bit longer in learning new things, he is of average intelligence INT L this employee is a real self-starter. The employee always takes the initiative and his superior never has to prod him INIT H
  • Slide 173
  • 173 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale - this employee is extremely intelligent, and he learns very rapidly INT H 0 while generally this employee shows initiative, occasionally his superior must prod him to complete work INIT M + while perhaps this employee is not a genius, he is a lot more Intelligent than many people I know INT M + this employee has a bit of tendency to sit around and wait for directions INIT L + although this employee is slower than some in understanding things, And may take a bit longer in learning new things, he is of average intelligence INT L - this employee is a real self-starter. The employee always takes the initiative and his superior never has to prod him INIT H Employee A
  • Slide 174
  • 174 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale SCORELOW MEDIUM HIGH 7 + + + 6+ +0 5+ + - 4 + 0 - 3 + - - 2 0 - - 1 - - - Key
  • Slide 175
  • 175 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale What about reliability?
  • Slide 176
  • 176 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale What about reliability?What about validity?
  • Slide 177
  • 177 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale What about reliability? What about specificity? What about validity?
  • Slide 178
  • 178 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Attribute Approach Mixed Rating Scale What about reliability? What about specificity?What about acceptability? What about validity?
  • Slide 179
  • 179 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Three techniques within this approach Critical incident Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) Behavioral observation scales (BOS)
  • Slide 180
  • 180 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Critical incidents Requires managers to keep record of specific examples of effective and ineffective performance
  • Slide 181
  • 181 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Critical incidents classification incident description Date + + + + + - -
  • Slide 182
  • 182 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Critical incidents What about reliability? What about specificity?What about acceptability? What about validity?
  • Slide 183
  • 183 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)
  • Slide 184
  • 184 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) select a group of behaviors, then for each behavior set a group of statements that describe several levels of performing the behavior
  • Slide 185
  • 185 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) Example A nurses preparedness for shift is one job behavior
  • Slide 186
  • 186 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) this nurse arrives at her shift on time, dressed as the code requires, Having all equipment with her, receives all required reports from previous shift this nurse arrives at her shift a few minutes late, have to go to closet to dress up as the code requires,Have to gather her equipment, receives all required reports from previous shift this nurse arrives at her shift very late, have to go to closet to dress up as the code requires,cannot find her equipment, not keen on receiving all required reports from previous shift
  • Slide 187
  • 187 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Behavioral observation scales (BOS) It adds another dimension to BARS, which is the dimension of frequency
  • Slide 188
  • 188 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Behavioral Approach Behavioral observation scales (BOS) this nurse arrives at her shift on time, dressed as the code requires, Having all equipment with her, receives all required reports from previous shift Almost always 321Almost never
  • Slide 189
  • 189 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Results Approach Management by objectives top management passes down companys strategic goals to next layer of management, and these managers define the goals they must achieve
  • Slide 190
  • 190 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Quality Approach A performance management system designed with a strong quality orientation can be expected to: Emphasize an assessment of both person and system factors in the measurement system. Emphasize that managers and employees work together to solve performance problems. Involve both internal and external customers in setting standards and measuring performance. Use multiple sources to evaluate person and system factors
  • Slide 191
  • 191 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information Are managers the only source of appraisal information?
  • Slide 192
  • 192 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information Are managers the only source of appraisal information? NO
  • Slide 193
  • 193 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information Having several sources of appraisal information increases the validity
  • Slide 194
  • 194 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information Who should appraise person A? A
  • Slide 195
  • 195 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information who should appraise person A? self
  • Slide 196
  • 196 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information who should appraise person A? A subordinates
  • Slide 197
  • 197 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information who should appraise person A? A supervisor
  • Slide 198
  • 198 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information who should appraise person A? A peer
  • Slide 199
  • 199 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Information who should appraise person A? A customer
  • Slide 200
  • 200 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Sources of Appraisal Errors There are five types of errors a rater could commit Similar to me Contrast Distributional errors Halo Horns
  • Slide 201
  • 201 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Similar-to-me Error when the raters evaluation is affected by the similarity between him and the subject The concept of similarity could take one of many forms: gender, religion, region, country, political views, etc.
  • Slide 202
  • 202 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error when the raters evaluation is affected by wrong selection of the reference
  • Slide 203
  • 203 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error KSAOs TDRs Appraisal instrument Product/ service Apply them in To produce measure compare Reference
  • Slide 204
  • 204 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error reference performance Negative performance
  • Slide 205
  • 205 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error reference performance positive performance
  • Slide 206
  • 206 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error reference performance negative performance
  • Slide 207
  • 207 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error reference performance negative performance So, which reference should we choose?
  • Slide 208
  • 208 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error reference performance negative performance Realistic and fair reference
  • Slide 209
  • 209 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Contrast Error should I compare KAUH employees with employees of Mayo clinic or with employees of Princess Basma Hospital? Realistic and fair reference
  • Slide 210
  • 210 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Distributional Error when the raters evaluations do not fit a normal distribution curve
  • Slide 211
  • 211 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Distributional Error
  • Slide 212
  • 212 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Distributional Error strictness error
  • Slide 213
  • 213 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Distributional Error leniency error
  • Slide 214
  • 214 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Halo Error when the rater fails to treat each aspect of performance separately; a positive evaluation of one aspect is generalized to other aspects Example Because doctor A has high surgical skills, he also receives high scores on his poor traits
  • Slide 215
  • 215 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Horns Error when the rater fails to treat each aspect of performance separately; a negative evaluation of one aspect is generalized to other aspects Example Because doctor A has low surgical skills, he also receives low scores on his good traits
  • Slide 216
  • 216 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Reducing Errors How do we reduce the errors in appraisal?
  • Slide 217
  • 217 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Reducing Errors How do we reduce the errors in appraisal? Through training
  • Slide 218
  • 218 Rami Gharaibeh Performance Appraisal Feedback Feedback should be given every day, not once a year. Ask employees to rate their performance before the session. Encourage the subordinate to participate in the session. Focus on solving problems. Focus feedback on behavior or results, not on the person. Minimize criticism. Agree to specific goals and set a date to review progress.
  • Slide 219
  • 219 END MODULE II Rami Gharaibeh