Upload
lenard-harper
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 London, 30 April 2004
Working Group on Auction Design and Competitive Issues
London, 30 April 2004
2 London, 30 April 2004
Next steps of the EU Public Procurement Learning Lab
- Development of the Working Groups’ studies
- 3rd Meeting in September (Stockholm)
- 4th Meeting in November (Candidates?)
3 London, 30 April 2004
EU Lab’s participants - (for discussion)
Governance Organisation Main features Organisations
Large Administrations
• Their purchasing activity is essentially addressed to their own organisation• Product categories and services are consistent with
their own requirements
Ministry of Development (Greece)Ministry of Environment (Greece)
Central Purchasing
Bodies
• Their purchasing activity is addressed also to other public administrations• Product categories purchased are generally very
wide: Paper & Stationary; ITC products and services: Hard- and Software, Printers, Desktop + PCs & Maintenance; Photocopiers; Telephone Services; Cars; Facility Management; Transport & Postal Services; Furniture; Oil & Energy; Travel services; Food & Meal Coupons
Consip (Italy)BBG (Austria)
BESCHA (Germany)Swedish Agency for Public Management
(Sweden)OGC (UK)
Administration of State Material Reserves (Czech Republic)
Ministerio de Hacienda (Spain)Department of Finance (Ireland)
ABA (Belgium)National Procurement Ltd (Denmark)
Ministry of economy, finance and industry (France)
Authorities
• Their interest in public procurement is not due to direct purchase activity since their main object is to set the “rule” for the Public Sector Procurement. Their task are (in general): Assist the Public Administrations, Verify correct use of procurement procedures and practices, Make recommendations, Promote competition and transparency, Collect and publish statistical data on Public Procurement; Advocate other institutions in international contexts; implement the procurement legislation
Treasury of the Republic of Cyprus (Cyprus)
Office of Commissioner for Access to Public Information (Slovenia)
Council for Public Procurement (Hungary)
Bulgaria (Public procurement directorate)PPO (Poland)
Office for Public Procurement (Slovakia)
4 London, 30 April 2004
Referents from Consip
1. Giancarlo De [email protected]+ 39.06.85.449.627 (office)+ 39.329.66.05.444 (mobile)
2. Michele [email protected]+ 39.06.85.449.586 (office)+ 39.329.77.09.143 (mobile)
3. Matteo [email protected]+ 39.06.85.449.694 (office)+ 39.339.40.60.227 (mobile)
4. Laura [email protected]+ 39.06.85.449.696 (office)
5 London, 30 April 2004
Auction design Working Group - Index
Participants
Working plan
Questionnaire structure Preliminary remarks on the Questionnaire Glossary General information about the organisation Auction design and competitive issues
Introduction Auction design Competition
6 London, 30 April 2004
Participants in the Working Group
1. Italy2. Austria3. Belgium-ABA4. Czech Republic – Administration of the State Material
Reserves 5. Greece – Ministry of Development6. Greece – Ministry of Environment7. Finland8. Ireland9. Norway10. Slovakia11. Slovenia – Public Procurement Office12. Slovenia – Office of Commissioner for Access to Public
Information
7 London, 30 April 2004
Working programme
A M J J A S O N D
Distribution of Questionnaires
Filling in the Questionnaire
Collection
Elaboration
First Draft (Stockholm)
Final Report
8 London, 30 April 2004
Structure of the Questionnaire
Estimated time to fill the questionnaire in is around 2,5 d/p
Questionnaire
General information about your organisation
Preliminary remarks on the Questionnaires
Recommendations
A. Auction design
B. Competitive issues
Glossary
9 London, 30 April 2004
Glossary
Glossary: goals
• Facilitate the understanding of questions and to stimulate the attention of the reader
• To establish a common reference vocabulary
Glossary NOTICE: the aim of this glossary is to facilitate the understanding of questions and to stimulate the attention of the reader. For this reason, in order to help the identification of particular experiences, and to establish a common reference vocabulary, we also provide a comprehensive list of the most important kind of auctions treated by the economic theory. Auction: by Auction we refer to what in the EU directives is defined Open Procedure and Restricted Procedure a as well as to transposition of these procedures in Domestic Laws of EU Member States. These procedures are a particular kind of auctions that in auction theory is defined sealed bid auction. Open Procedure shall mean those national procedures whereby all interested providers may submit a tender in response to a notice placed in the Official Journal. This procedure is mainly used for simple procurement requirements. All tenders are considered, and the auctioneer selects the winner on the basis of pre-specified contract award criteria. Restricted Procedure shall mean those national procedures whereby only those providers invited by the authority may submit a tender. This is the most common procedure. The Auctioneer selects a limited number of tenders after .............
10 London, 30 April 2004
General part
General Part: goal
• To collect information about your organisation and some other details about activities and businesses
1. General Information on your Organization
a) Main activity: Stipulate national frame contracts, IT consultancy to the Ministry of Economy and Finance and to Public Administrations
b) Number of employees:
About 550
c) ……….
11 London, 30 April 2004
Preliminary remarks, Glossary and General part
Recommendations: goals
• To help while filling-in the questionnaire
• To achieve a homogeneous collection of information
2. RecommendationsThe questionnaire involves a wide range of aspects, such as juridical matters, business problems, theoretical features. Comprehensive answers may require to consult several colleagues involved in different areas within your institution, and a sharing of the answers given is advisable.
For a certain number of answers the support of data would be very useful; on the other hand providing detailed and accurate data is time-consuming, so a trade-off between time, amount of information and accuracy can be reasonable, bearing in mind that “rough data” are better than “no-data”.
Very often particular case studies and specific experiences may be very interesting and helpful for the final Report; for this reason it will be very valuable describing both general practices and specific cases which you deem interesting.
Please do not hesitate to contact Italian representatives for any clarification related to the questionnaire. In so doing, you will provide useful feedback that may help others to fill in the questionnaire in, and a more homogeneous collection of data.
12 London, 30 April 2004
Specific Part
A: Auction design - Consideration of the main aspects of the auction design
• Awarding Procedure• Lots• Length and division of contract• Reserve price• Participation requirement• Awarding criteria• Disclosure policy• Subcontracting
B: Competition
Methods to increase competition and own experience
13 London, 30 April 2004
Main issues - Auction Design
Awarding Procedure
• Many possible “formats” available, difficult choice
• Possible standardization operated by legislation, tradition or other factors
• Importance of exceptions and particular experiences
• New possibilities with electronic auctions
• Package bidding
14 London, 30 April 2004
Main issues - Auction Design
Lots and Length of contracts
Effect on participation and competition of:
• splitting contracts into numerous lots
• different lengths of contracts
Awarding criteria
• Lowest price or most economically advantageous offer? Why? When?
15 London, 30 April 2004
Main issues - Auction Design
Disclosure policy
• The effect of disclosing more or less information to possible bidders on competition and collusion
• Role of dialogue with enterprises in auction design