Upload
myles-boyd
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Location Analysis Decision-making
Need to identify factors that are important for the location decision being made
Relevant factors will be influenced byType of facilityGeography involved
2
Types Of Facilities
Heavy manufacturingauto plants, steel mills, oil refineries
Light industrysmall components manufacturing,
assembly and packagingWarehouse & distribution centersRetail & service
3
Factors In Manufacturing & Light Industry Plant Location
Labor availability, cost and attitudeRaw material & finished goods shipment
modesProximity to raw materialsUtilitiesConstruction costsLand costs
4
Factors In Warehouse Location
Transportation costs
Proximity to markets
5
Factors In Retail & Service Location
Proximity to customersAccessibility for customersAttractiveness of facility
6
Location Decision Sequence
Country
© 1995 Corel Corp.
Region/Community
© 1995 Corel Corp.
Site
© 1995 Corel Corp.
7
Global Location Factors
Government stability Government regulations Political & economic systems Economic stability & growth Exchange rates Culture Climate Export import regulations Duties & tariffs Raw material availability Position of global markets
Number and proximity of suppliers
Transportation & distribution system
Labor cost & education Available technology Commercial travel Technical expertise Cross-border trade
regulations Group trade agreements
8
Ranking of Countries in the 2010 - 2011 Global Competitiveness Report (World Economic Forum*)
1 Switzerland
2 Sweden
3 Singapore
4 U.S.
5 Germany
6 Japan
7 Finland
8 Netherlands
9 Denmark
10 Canada
11 Hong Kong
12 United Kingdom
13 Taiwan, China
14 Norway
15 France
16 Australia
17 Qatar
18 Austria
19 Belgium
20 Luxembourg
* http://www3.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global Competitiveness Report/index.htm
9
Regional Location Factors
Labor (availability, education, cost & attitude)
Proximity of customers Construction/leasing
costs Land costs Modes and quality of
transportation Transportation costs Proximity of suppliers
Taxes Incentive packages Governmental
regulations Environmental
regulations Raw material availability Climate Infrastructure Education system
10
Factors Affecting Site
Site size and cost Air, rail, highway,
and waterway systems
Zoning restrictions Nearness of
services/supplies needed
Environmental impact issues
© 1995 Corel Corp.
11
Location Decision Example
In 1992, BMW decided to build its first major manufacturing plant outside Germany in Spartanburg, South Carolina.
© 1995 Corel Corp.
12
Country Decision Factors
Market location U.S. is world’s largest
luxury car market Growing (baby boomers)
Labor Lower manufacturing labor
costs $17/hr. (U.S.) vs. $27
(Germany) Higher labor productivity
11 holidays (U.S.) vs. 31 (Germany)
OtherLower shipping
cost ($2,500/car less)
New plant & equipment would increase productivity (lower cost/car $2,000-3000)
13
Region/Community Decision Factors
Labor Lower wages in South Carolina (SC)
About $17,000/yr. (SC) vs. $27,051/yr. (US) Based on 1993 metropolitan averages for
all workers
Government incentives $135 million in state & local tax breaks Free-trade zone from airport to plant
No duties on imported components or on exported cars
14
Location Evaluation Methods
Factor-rating method
Center of gravity method
Transportation model
15
Factor-Rating Method
Most widely used location techniqueUseful for service & industrial locationsRates locations using factors
Intangible (qualitative) factors Example: Education quality, labor skills
Tangible (quantitative) factorsExample: Short-run & long-run costs
16
Steps in Factor Rating Method
List relevant factors Assign importance weight to each
factor (0 - 1) Develop scale for each factor (1 - 100) Score each location using factor scale Multiply scores by weights for each
factor & total Select location with maximum total
score
17
Location Factor Example
Labor pool and climateProximity to suppliersWage ratesCommunity environmentProximity to customersShipping modesAir service
.30
.20
.15
.15
.10
.05
.05
80100
6075658550
65919580909265
90757280956590
Location Factor Weight Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Scores (0 to 100)
18
Location Factor Example
Labor pool and climateProximity to suppliersWage ratesCommunity environmentProximity to customersShipping modesAir serviceTotal Score
24.0020.00
9.0011.25
6.504.252.50
77.50
19.5018.2014.2512.00
9.004.603.25
80.80
27.0015.0010.8012.00
9.503.254.50
*82.05
Location Factor Site 1 Site 2 Site 3Weighted Scores
19
Center of Gravity Method
Finds location of single distribution center serving several destinations
Used primarily for services & warehousing Considers
Location of existing destinations Example: Markets, retailers etc.
Volume to be shipped Shipping distance (or cost)
Shipping cost/unit/mile is constant
20
Center of Gravity Method Steps
Place existing locations on a coordinate grid Grid has arbitrary origin & scale Maintains relative distances
Calculate X & Y coordinates for ‘center of gravity’ Gives location of distribution center Minimizes transportation cost
21
Center of Gravity Method Equations
ddixix = x coordinate of = x coordinate of
location ilocation i
WWii == Volume of Volume of
goods moved to or from goods moved to or from location i location i
ddiyiy = y coordinate of = y coordinate of
location ilocation i
X CoordinateX Coordinate
Y CoordinateY Coordinate
ii
iiix
x W
WdC
ii
iiiy
y W
WdC
22
Center-of-Gravity Example
y
700
500
600
400
300
200
100
0 x700500 600400300200100
o
A
B
C
D
Center
A B C DX 200 100 250 500Y 200 500 600 300Wt 75 105 135 60
23
Location Analysis Technique
Transportation Method
Identify a location for a new facility so that the location minimizes the company’s overall cost of production and transportation for the supply chain.
To perform this analysis, one must be able to model a given set of facilities and identify the shipping strategy that will minimize the total shipping costs.
24
Balanced Transportation Models
A transportation problem is balanced if
Total supply at all of the sources =
Total demand at all of the destinations
The mill problem is currently balanced with Total Supply = Total Demand = 600 tons
In this case, all of the units are shipped from the sources and all of the destinations receive their demand
25
Unbalanced Transportation Models
If Total supply at all of the sources >Total demand at all of the destinations, the problem is feasible. There will be unshipped
units at some of the source locations though. (Resolve model with Kansas City supply set
equal to 200 tons)
If Total supply at all of the sources <Total demand at all of the destinations, the problem will be infeasible. (Resolve model with Kansas City supply set
equal to 100 tons)
26
Solving an Infeasible Unbalanced Transportation Model
The model needs to be balanced in order to identify an optimal shipping strategy. An extra source must be added into the model to supply the current shortage.
Extra capacity needed = Total demand at all destinations – Total supply at all current sources
To create this additional source of supply/capacity, either
Acquire a new facility and include it in the network design and spreadsheet model’s table structure
or
add a Dummy source into the model’s table structure
27
Solving the Mill Transportation Problem when Kansas City has only 100 tons capacity
In this problem, the total demand exceeds the total supply by 600 – 550 = 50 tons
Insert a dummy grain elevator with a capacity of 50 tons and a unit shipping cost of $0 to each mill. Edit the spreadsheet model and Solver dialog box to include this new imaginary source.
The identified optimal solution will identify how many tons to ship from each grain elevator to each of the mills. The tons shipped from the dummy elevator are units that will not actually be distributed; these are the amounts that the receiving mills will be short in the eventual distribution.
28
Building a new grain elevator when Kansas City has only 100 tons capacity
In this problem, the total demand still exceeds the total supply by 600 – 550 = 50 tons
Insert a possible location for a new grain elevator with a capacity of at least 50 tons along with the identified unit shipping costs from this location to each mill. Edit the spreadsheet model and Solver dialog box to include the new grain elevator at this location.
The identified optimal solution will identify how many tons to ship from each grain elevator, including the additional elevator at the new location, to each of the mills so as to minimize total costs
29
HHN, Inc. Cabinet Problem
Read the HHN, Inc. Cabinet problem
Is the current transportation problem with the three plants and four market areas balanced?
How would you identify whether Beijing or Fountainbleu is a better location for a fourth plant?