Upload
alice-johnson
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
INTRODUCTION TO CONTINUOUS INTRODUCTION TO CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORSGLUCOSE MONITORS
H. Peter Chase, MDProfessor of Pediatrics
Barbara Davis Center
Aurora, CO
Keystone Conference
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
22
CGM Introduction ClassCGM Introduction Class
• The slides from our course for families interested in starting CGM are available for use in your centers. They are on our website: www.barbaradaviscenter.org. The slides can then be accessed by any of the following methods:
• 1. Click on the “CGM Slideset” tab• 2. In the “Online Books and Teaching Slides” page:
http://www.uchsc.edu/misc/diabetes/books.html• 3. In the Clinical Resources section (last entry): http://www.uchsc.edu/misc/diabetes/school.html
33
What is a CGM?What is a CGM? (Continuous Glucose Monitor) (Continuous Glucose Monitor)
• A device that provides “real-time” glucose readings and data about trends in glucose levels
• Reads the glucose levels under the skin every 1-5 minutes (10-15 minute delay)
• Provides alarms for high and low glucose levels and trend information
• The 3rd era in diabetes management
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
44
Who Should Use a CGM?*Who Should Use a CGM?*
1) The person and the family must both want a CGM
2) A youth must be willing to wear the sensor (and carry the receiver)
3) Using good diabetes care (4 BGs/day)4) Good support system5) Adequate body “real estate”6) Cost of CGM (RNs to elaborate)
*(Understanding Pumps and CGMs, p.100)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
55
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) WHY?
A.Prevention of low blood sugars (alarms)
B. Prevention of high blood sugars (ketones)
C.Minimize wide glucose fluctuations
D.Behavior Modification
E. Prevention of Complications (?)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
66
How common are glucose levels <60mg/dl How common are glucose levels <60mg/dl during the night in children with T1D?during the night in children with T1D?
– French (i) and Australian (ii) data showed approximately 50% of children with low BG (<60mg/dl) during the night (on NPH bid)
– DirecNet data (one night in hospital with blood sugars every 30 min.)
A) 2001-2002: 39 of 91 (43%) low BG
(44% of children on insulin pumps/56% on NPH)
B) 2004: 14 of 50 (28%) with low BG
(all on insulin pumps or Lantus)
i) Beregszaszi M, et al. J Pediatr. 131, 27, 1997ii) Porter PA, et al. J. Pediatr. 13, 366, 1997Barbara Davis Center May 2008
77
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) WHY?
A. Prevention of low blood sugars (alarms)
B.Prevention of high blood sugars (ketones)
C.Minimize wide glucose fluctuations
D.Behavior Modification
E. Prevention of Complications (?)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
88
“Snapshot of BG levels”
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
99
Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1010
Hyperglycemia is common, Hyperglycemia is common, especially after mealsespecially after meals
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
< 180 181 - 240 241 - 300 > 300
Breakfast
Lunch
Dinner
Boland et al, Diabetes Care 24:1858, 2001Barbara Davis Center May 2008
1111
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) WHY?
A. Prevention of low blood sugars (alarms)
B. Prevention of high blood sugars (ketones)
C.Minimize wide glucose fluctuations
D.Behavior Modification
E. Prevention of Complications?
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1212
Three Parts to All CGMs:*Three Parts to All CGMs:*
A. Sensor
B. Transmitter
C. Receiver/Monitor*(Understanding Pumps and CGMs, p.103)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1313
A)Sensor (p.103)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1414
B)Transmitter(p.103)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1515
C)Receiver or Monitor(p.103)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1616
What does “Calibration” mean and What does “Calibration” mean and why do I need to do it?why do I need to do it?
• Calibration is a process that gives a fingerstick BG value to the CGM system so the values will align with each other
• Number of Calibrations vary by device
• Best times to calibrate are when the BG values are stable: before meals and before bed
• Do not calibrate when arrows are presentBarbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
1717
What type of data will we get?
1) “Real-time” (Immediate)
i. Trend graphs (p.109)*
ii. Alarms (p.110)*
iii. Trend arrows (p.113)*
*(Understanding Pumps and CGMs)Barbara Davis Center May 2008
Trend graphs – Knowing a glucose level is 240 mg/dl may not be as important as knowing the “trend.”
i) TREND GRAPHS*
*(Understanding Pumps and CGMs, p.103)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
ii) ALARMS (p.109)ii) ALARMS (p.109) Can warn patients of current or Can warn patients of current or
projected high and low blood sugarprojected high and low blood sugar
• Projected alarms: 10, 20, or 30 minute warning of impending hypo- or hyperglycemia (Navigator and Guardian devices)
• Threshold alarms: warning when glucose is below or above a set value (all devices)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
iii) TREND ARROWS (p.110)iii) TREND ARROWS (p.110)Rate of Change ArrowsRate of Change Arrows
Gives the up-to-the-minute glucose value and a rate of change arrow
Glucose going down-1 to -2 (mg/dL)/min
Glucose going up1 to 2 (mg/dL)/min
Glucose falling quickly>-2 (mg/dL)/min
Fairly stable glucose -1 to 1 (mg/dL)/min
Glucose rising quickly>2 (mg/dL)/min
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2121
Second type of data:Second type of data:(Retrospective, must download)(Retrospective, must download)
2) Retrospective
A.Modal Day Graphs (p.113)
B.Pie Chart (p.114)
C.Statistics (p.113)*(Understanding Pumps and CGMs, Chapter 17, p.109)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2222
A) Case Study:A) Case Study:Modal Day Graphs*Modal Day Graphs*
• Teenager with T1D for 9.5 years• Started Navigator: Sept. 2005• Starting HbA1c: 7.1%• Most recent HbA1c: 6.0%• Current number of low BGs per week (<60
mg/dL or <3.3 mmol/L): 1/week• Three “modal-day” graphs:
*(Understanding Pumps and CGMs, p.113)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2323
A) BASELINE GLUCOSE MODAL DAY:A) BASELINE GLUCOSE MODAL DAY:i) Prior to Navigator Usei) Prior to Navigator Use
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2424
A) GLUCOSE MODAL DAYBreakfast/Lunch Improvements
ii) After three months of useii) After three months of use
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2525
A) GLUCOSE MODAL DAYiii) Most recent reportiii) Most recent report
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2626
B) PIE CHARTS (p.114)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2727
C) STATISTICS (p.113)
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2828
USE OF CGM RESULTS:(To “fine-tune” insulin and diabetes management)
i) Important not to overwhelm families
*** One change at a time ***
ii) Look for patterns 2 out of 3 days
iii) A behavior modification device Missed boluses, snacking, low BGs on CGM
iv) Good initial communication with HCP
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
2929
Questions?Questions?
• The presentation by the nurses will be next.
• You will then examine the CGMs from 3 companies.
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
3030
Part 2: CLINICAL STUDIESPart 2: CLINICAL STUDIES
• Use of CGM (The Navigator) in Clinical Studies of Children:
A) Insulin Pump Study (JPediatr 151:388,2007)
B) Lantus Study (DiabetesCare 31:525,2008)
3131
CGM can help with glycemic control
N 30
Mean Age
T1D duration
11.2 yr
5.8 years
Female 40%
HbA1c Initial 13 wks7.1±0.6% 6.8±0.7%
(p=0.02)
A) 30 Pump Patients Using Navigator x 13 weeks*
*DirecNet J Pediatri 151,388,2007
3232
HbA1cH
bA
1c (
%)
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Baseline Week 7 Week 13 Week 26
Baseline A1c 7.0%Baseline A1c >7.0%
Black dots denote mean values and boxes denote median, 25 th and 75th percentiles.
N=15
N=15N=15
N=15
N=13
N=15
N=13
N=12
* p=0.004 vs. baseline; § p=0.002 vs. wks 9-13.
§
*
3333
Percentage of Navigator Glucose Valuesin Target Range
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Baseline Wks1-4
Wks5-8
Wks9-13
Wks14-17
Wks18-21
Wks22-26
Pe
rce
nt
in t
arg
et r
an
ge
(71
-1
80)
Baseline A1c 7.0%Baseline A1c >7.0%
N=14
N=15 N=15N=15
N=11N=9
N=11
N=11
N=11 N=13
N=13 N=15
N=15N=13
3434
Percentage of Navigator Glucose Values Below 70 mg/dL
Per
cen
t b
elo
w 7
0 m
g/d
L
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Baseline Wks1-4
Wks5-8
Wks9-13
Wks14-17
Wks18-21
Wks22-26
Baseline A1c 7.0%Baseline A1c >7.0%
N=11
N=11
N=13N=13
N=15N=15
N=13
N=14
N=15N=15
N=15N=11
N=9
N=11
3535
N 27 (23 completed)
Age 11.0 ± 3.9 yr
Female 14 (52%)
Caucasian 25 (93%)
HbA1c 7.9 ± 1.0%
T1D duration 4.0 ± 3.1 yr
MDI Regimen
Glargine + RAIA*
Glargine + RAIA* + NPH
Other
21 (78%)
5 (16%)
1 ( 4%)
* DirecNet: Diabetes Care 31:525, 2008
B) Lantus Subjects using CGM*
3636
Lantus Subjects using CGMLantus Subjects using CGMResults – Glycemic ControlResults – Glycemic Control
Hb
A1c
(%
)
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
Baseline A1c ≤ 7.5%Baseline A1c > 7.5%
Baseline Week 7 Week 13
** p = 0.03* p = 0.02
*
**
3737
Lantus Subjects using CGMLantus Subjects using CGMResults – Glycemic VariabilityResults – Glycemic Variability
Mea
n A
mp
litu
de
of
Gly
cem
icE
xcu
rsio
n (
MA
GE
, m
g/d
L)
80
100
120
140
160
180
Baseline Wks 1-4 Wks 5-8 Wks 9-13
Baseline A1c ≤ 7.5%Baseline A1c > 7.5%
*
**
** p = 0.17 * p = 0.004
3838
• Use of the Navigator CGM was associated with an improvement in glycemic control without an accompanying rise in hypoglycemia
• Glycemic variability decreased with use of the Navigator
• Subjects and parents reported high overall satisfaction with the Navigator and did not demonstrate deterioration in quality of life during 3-month use
• CGM are tolerable and effective in children using MDI regimens
Lantus Subjects using CGM Conclusions
3939
CGM Influences on Glucose Levels
Blinded vs Non-Blinded CGM Tracings:
p-value
• 21% less time <55 mg/dl <0.001
• 23% less time >240 mg/dl <0.001
• 26% more time in target <0.001
(81 – 140 mg/dl)
(Garg et al, Diabetes Care 27:1922,2004)
4040
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS OF CGM(QUIZ)
1) “If I use CGM, I do not have to do BG checks anymore.”
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
4141
2) “The starting of CGM will make diabetes management a breeze – so simple!”
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS OF CGM
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
4242
3) “The use of CGM will fix the diabetes – all blood sugars will be perfect.”
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS OF CGM
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
4343
4) “My CGM values should match my BG values.”
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS OF CGM
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
4444
5) “The alarms will catch every low or pending low so I don’t need to worry about lows anymore.”
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS OF CGM
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes May 2008
4545
CLOSED LOOP (BIONIC) PANCREAS
“The Future”
i) Will probably come in parts
ii) JDRF supporting algorithm development
iii) Should reduce glucose highs, lows, and fluctuations
iv) Will probably be more realistic than islet cell transplant
v) FDA and medical insurance approvals (as with CGM) will be critical
4646
Q. Why combine insulin pumps (CSII) and Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGM)?
(p121)
A: “They complement each other tremendously and provide the most ‘state of the art’ diabetes care available.”
The CGM helps with:
•Cannulas dislodging
•Missed food boluses
•Hypoglycemia
•Corrections
4747
Our Initial Data:Our Initial Data:
1. Two oral presentations at ADA in June, 2008 (Abstract # 230-OR and 42-OR).
2. Our emphasis: Preventing severe hypoglycemia at night.
3. This may be the first part of a closed loop system acceptable to the FDA.
4. We have shown that 80% of pending lows can be predicted.
5. Safety remains the primary goal.
4848
“Now let me get this right, Dr. Chase… You want the elves to make an
artificial pancreas?”THANK YOU