Upload
jasper-fisher
View
219
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
International Market Integration for Natural Gas?A Co-integration Analysis of Gas Prices in Europe, North
America, and Japan
Guillaume L'Hégaret, Boriss Siliverstovs
Christian von Hirschhausen, Anne Neumann
DIW Berlin
6th IAEE European Conference
Zurich, September 2004
2
Agenda
1. The Issue: Internationalization of Natural Gas Markets
2. Theory and Data
3. Model 1: Cointegration of International Gas Prices
4. Model 2: Convergence of Trans-Atlantic Gas Prices
5. Conclusions
3
1. The Issue:Increasing Integration of Natural Gas Markets
- At the European level:
- EU-Acceleration Directive 2003/55: increasing competition within and between countries
- Decreasing weight of oil price indexation, e.g. long-term gas contracts in the UK
- At the international level:
- Trend towards LNG in the three large gas consuming regions (North America, Europe, Asia)
- Internationalization of LNG markets, in particular:
- Intensification of transatlantic LNG-trade and ... competition
=> This presentation analyzes the relation between international marker prices for gas and oil, with a view of quantifying long-term links between them
=> Our working hypothesis is that the split between the European and the North American gas markets did prevail in the 1990s, but that one might increasingly see signs of market integration
6
Agenda
1. The Issue: Internationalization of Natural Gas Markets
2. Theory and Data
3. Model 1: Cointegration of International Gas Prices
4. Model 2: Convergence of Trans-Atlantic Gas Prices
5. Conclusions
7
2. Theory:Cointegration, the Law of One Price (LOP), and Convergence
Cointegration:
- xt, a N-dimensional process, is co-integrated if each component of the process is I(1) but there exists
v, a N-dimensional vector, such that v‘xt is I(0) Johansen Test ~ Model 1
Law of one price:- LOP is equivalent to having every relative price in the system constant in the long term
α ~ transportation costs, quality, risk premium, etc.
β ~ relationship between the prices β = 0 no market integration
β = 1 LOP holds; markets are fully integrated; proportionate prices
Convergence:
- A dynamic structural change, time-varying coefficient models Kalman Filter ~ Model 2
β(t) ~ relationship between the prices
β = 0 no market integration
β = 1 LOP holds; markets are fully integrated
β 1 increasing market integration over time
lnp1 = α + β*lnp2 +et
lnp1t = α(t) + β(t)*lnp2t + et
8
Literature: Integration of regional gas markets
• North America
- De Vany and Walls (1995): Gas spot prices in several locations (hubs) are
increasingly cointegrated with open access to the pipelines (post FERC Order 436)
- King and Cuc (1996): price convergence in regional markets, but also a “split”
between Eastern and Western region
- Serletis (1997): Bi- and multivariate tests for co-integration, indicating that North
American natural gas spot markets are integrated (no “split”)
• Europe (Asche, Osmundsen, Tveteras, 2001, 2002)
- Cointegration of European gas import prices (from Russia, Norway, Netherlands)
- Cointegration of domestic gas prices, e.g. Belgium, France, Germany
10
Monthly DataSummary Statistics (until mid-2002)
Variable No. of obs.
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Skew. Kurt.
Brent Level
Log156
3.68
1.27
0.96
0.26
1.80
0.59
6.63
1.89
0.72
0.02
3.31
2.95
Pipe Europe Level
Log127
2.65
0.96
0.44
0.17
1.68
0.52
3.90
1.36
0.47
-0.18
3.83
3.71
LNG Europe Level
Log64
2.84
1.02
0.63
0.23
1.80
0.59
4.10
1.41
0.15
-0.25
2.27
2.24
LNG Japan Level
Log127
3.74
1.31
0.59
0.15
2.74
1.01
5.12
1.63
0.48
0.17
2.51
2.42
Henry Hub Level
Log109
2.73
0.93
1.24
0.37
1.42
0.35
8.50
2.14
2.31
0.97
9.93
3.94
Pipe USA Level
Log114
2.43
0.81
1.22
0.36
1.34
0.29
9.45
2.25
3.00
1.49
14.25
5.54
LNG USA Level
Log104
2.80
1.00
0.78
0.24
1.77
0.57
6.41
1.86
2.05
1.01
8.76
4.65
11
Unit Root TestsAll variables are I(1)
Market Log Levels First difference of log Levels
ADF PP ADF PP
Brent -1.88 -1.91 -3.85*** -9.55***
LNG USA -1.75 -2.65* -5.47*** -13.44***
LNG Europe -1.45 -1.10 -2.31 -6.21***
Pipe Europe -2.06 -1.74 -4.08*** -10.00***
LNG Japan -2.17 -1.63 -2.86* -9.57***
Henry Hub -2.07 -2.22 -4.10*** -8.50***
Pipe USA -1.94 -1.91 -5.74*** -9.55***
Tests for prices in level use a constant but not a time trend. Tests for first differences are performed with neither intercept nor linear trend. One / two / three asterisks indicate significance at the 10% / 5% / 1 % level, respectively.
12
Agenda
1. The Issue: Internationalization of Natural Gas Markets
2. Theory and Data
3. Model 1: Cointegration of International Gas Prices
4. Model 2: Convergence of Trans-Atlantic Gas Prices
5. Conclusions
13
European LNG, European Pipeline and Japanese LNG (logged) are largely cointegrated …
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
Jan
93
Jul 9
3
Jan
94
Jul 9
4
Jan
95
Jul 9
5
Jan
96
Jul 9
6
Jan
97
Jul 9
7
Jan
98
Jul 9
8
Jan
99
Jul 9
9
Jan
00
Jul 0
0
Jan
01
Jul 0
1
Jan
02
Jul 0
2
Jan
03
Jul 0
3
LNG EuropePipeline EuropeLNG JapanBrent
14
… and so are American LNG, American Pipeline and
Henry Hub (logged), at least since 1999
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Jul 9
6
Nov
96
Mrz
97
Jul 9
7
Nov
97
Mrz
98
Jul 9
8
Nov
98
Mrz
99
Jul 9
9
Nov
99
Mrz
00
Jul 0
0
Nov
00
Mrz
01
Jul 0
1
Nov
01
Mrz
02
Jul 0
2
Nov
02
Mrz
03
Jul 0
3
Nov
03
LNG USA
Pipeline USA
Henry Hub
16
Bivariate Johansen Test ResultsSupport for the “regional divide”
Henry Hub Pipe USA LNG USA LNG Europe Brent LNG Japan
Pipe
USA
11.25*
18.07*
4.44**
LNG
USA
16.44***
27.75***
7.75***
14.60**
38.42***
19.58***
LNG
Europe
15.05**
17.69
0.30
12.75**
15.86
0.12
7.54
9.97
Brent 6.23
12.99
5.36
9.13
13.93**
16.57
0.64
30.23***
33.89***
0.30
LNG
Japan
7.64
18.37*
5.83**
3.84
13.25
8.21
14.12
26.02***
42.60***
12.28***
14.50**
59.37***
41.10***
Pipe
Europe
8.46
13.37
7.37
10.88
7.04
10.19
16.88***
21.00**
1.74
26.73***
34.45***
0.02
10.26
19.60*
2.93*
Cointegration
No evidence of cointegration
- First Line = VECM1 (neither intercept nor trend) in CE
- Second Line = VECM 2 (without trend) in CE
- Third Line = LR trace statistic to restrict VECM 2 to VECM 1
17
Estimated Cointegration Vector and the Law of One Price(selected statistics)
Pair
LOP
Likelihood Ratio
Cointegration Vector
(stand. err.)
LNG Europe,
Brent23.25***
1, -0.80
(0.02)
Brent,
LNG Japan39.2***
1, -1.51
(0.04)
LNG Europe,
LNG Japan 1.65
1, -0.87
(0.14)
Henry Hub,
LNG USA6.66***
1, -0.67
(0.07)
LNG USA,
Pipe USA16.21***
1, -0.59
(0.05)
18
Results from Model 1:Regional Market Integration, but not Trans-Atlantic
Henry Hub
Pipe USA
LNG USA
Pipe Europe
LNG Europe LNG Japan
Brent
19
Agenda
1. The Issue: Internationalization of Natural Gas Markets
2. Theory and Data
3. Model 1: Cointegration of International Gas Prices
4. Model 2: Convergence of Trans-Atlantic Gas Prices
5. Conclusions
20
Towards Cointegration of Spot Gas Pricesin Europe and North America?
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00$/Mbtu
NBP Henry Hub
21
Kalman Filter (NBP – Henry Hub)
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
- Two periods of “convergence“, stronger relations in winter periodsSome linkage between North American and European gas prices, but by far not
systematic
22
Agenda
1. The Issue: Internationalization of Natural Gas Markets
2. Theory and Data
3. Model 1: Cointegration of International Gas Prices
4. Model 2: Convergence of Trans-Atlantic Gas Prices
5. Conclusions
23
5. Conclusions
-The European/Japanese natural gas markets and the North American markets seem to be highly integrated within themselves
- Even so, the law of one price does not hold in any of the regional price relations
- For the period under observation, there seems to be no integration between the gas markets in Europe/Japan and North America
- However, analysis of recent data indicates at least some convergence between European and North American gas prices
The dynamic evolution of the trans-atlantic market, with increasing spot-trading and arbitrage, might lead to a further integration of European and North American gas markets and prices
24
Hypothesis for Further Research:Trans-Atlantic Market Integration
Henry Hub
Pipe USA
LNG USA
Pipe Europe
LNG Europe LNG Japan
Brent
25
Literature
Asche, Frank, Petter Osmundsen, and Ragnar Tveteras (2001): Market Integration for Natural Gas in Europe. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol. 16, No. 4, 300-312.
Asche, Frank, Petter Osmundsen, and Ragnar Tveteras (2002): European Market Integration for Gas ? Volume Flexibility and Political Risk. Energy Economics, Vol. 24, 249-265.
De Vany, Arthur and David Walls (1993): Pipeline Access and Market Integration in the Natural Gas Industry: Evidence from Cointegration Tests. The Energy Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1-19.
De Vany, Arthur and David Walls (1993): The Emerging New Order in Natural Gas – Market versus Regulation. Querum Books, Westport.
Deutsche Bank (2003): LNG: going… going… Gone Global. Global Equity Research.Engle, Robert F. and Clive W.J. Granger (1987): Cointegration and Error Correction: Repreentation, Estimation and
Testing. Econometrica, Vol. 55, 251-276.European Commission (2001): Green Paper – Towards a European Strategy for the Security of Energy Supply.
Luxembourg, Commission Document COM(2000)769final.Hartley, Peter R., and Dagobert L. Brito (2001): New Energy Technologies in the Natural Gas Sectors. Houston,
Texas, The James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy.Hendry, D. and K. Juselius (1999): Explaining Cointegation Analysis: Part II. Oxford, Nuffield College, Lecture Notes.International Energy Agency (2002): Flexibility in Natural Gas Supply and Demand. Paris, OECD.International Energy Agency (2004): Security of Gas Supply in Open Markets – LNG and Power at a Turning Point.
Paris, OECD.Jensen, James (2003): The LNG Revolution. The Energy Journal, Vol. 24, 1-45.Johansen, S. (1988): Statistical Analyis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol.
12, 231-254King, Martin and Milan Cuc (1996): Price Convergence in North American Natural Gas Spot Markets. The Energy
Journal, Vol. 17, No.2, 17-42.Meinhold, Richard and Nozer Singpurwalla (1983): Understanding the Kalman Filter. The American Statistician, Vol.
37, No. 2, 123-127Serletis, Apostoles (1997): Is there an East-West Split in North American Natural Gas Markets? The Energy Journal
Vol. 1, 47-62.Serletis, Apostoles and J. Herbert (1999): The Message in North American Energy Prices. Energy Economics Vol.
21, 471-483.
27
Data (USD/Mbtu)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
No
v-93
No
v-94
No
v-95
No
v-96
No
v-97
No
v-98
No
v-99
No
v-00
No
v-01
No
v-02
No
v-03
Henry Hub
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ja
n-9
0
Ja
n-9
2
Ja
n-9
4
Ja
n-9
6
Ja
n-9
8
Ja
n-0
0
Ja
n-0
2
Brent
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Pipeline Europe
Sources: IEA „Energy Prices and Taxes“ (several issues); Oil and Gas Journal Database (Henry Hub)
28
Multivariate Johansen Test Results
Group
Trace Statistic Likelihood Ratio Statistic
r = 0 r ≤ 1Model 1/
Model 2
Price out of coint. space
LNG Japan, Brent,
Henry Hub
24.19***
65.68***
5.83
14.2133.12***
Henry Hub
0.08
LNG Europe, LNG USA,
Henry Hub
36.00***
52.13***
12.00*
13.6014.52***
LNG Europe
0.50
LNG Europe, LNG USA,
Pipe USA
21.00
42.04***
7.96
13.3215.7***
LNG Europe
0.48
Brent, LNG Europe,
LNG USA
37.46***
41.32
8.37
12.010.12 LNG USA
LNG Europe, LNG Japan,
LNG USA
39.80***
58.03***
9.29
13.5714.96***
LNG USA
4.67**