1- Implementation of the security amendment 2- MCC/MCCIP · 2012. 6. 6. · 25 May 2011 ECG IT & legal European Commission Taxation and Customs Union 1- Implementation of the security

25 May 2011 ECG IT & legal

European Commission Taxation and Customs Union

Customs

1- Implementation of the security amendment

2- MCC/MCCIP



1- Implementation of the security amendment

End of transition period: 1/1/2011

Grace period for penalties to be granted ad hoc by MS to traders that can prove their technical difficulties to link to national system: ENS – 1/7/2011

Technically stable



Title of presentation

Subtitle

Import Control System Phase 1 (ICS)



ICS operational status in all MS

Technically system works well!

All 27 Member States in operation since 05.01.2011

Country Phase 1 Start DateAT 01/09/2009BE 01/07/2010BG 03/05/2010CY 15/10/2010CZ 30/06/2010DE 27/06/2010DK 05/01/2011EE 01/07/2010EL 03/01/2011ES 02/07/2009FI 14/12/2010FR 05/10/2010HU 01/12/2009IE 14/06/2010IT 28/12/2010LT 30/04/2010LU 01/01/2011LV 01/07/2009MT 03/08/2009NL 05/12/2010PL 17/05/2010PT 02/07/2009RO 01/10/2009SE 01/05/2010SI 01/12/2009SK 01/07/2009UK 01/12/2010



ICS – Availability report (April 2011)

ICS - Global availability rates in the last 13 month (%)

93%

94%

95%

96%

97%

98%

99%

100%

2010M04 2010M05 2010M06 2010M07 2010M08 2010M09 2010M10 2010M11 2010M12 2011M01 2011M02 2011M03 2011M04

S+U total S+U Avail. within BH S+U Avail.Out of BH

Situation on 30 April 2011

Average of the month:

97.88%



ICS – Number of ENS lodged between 01.01.2011 and 30.04.2011

-

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK

Number of ENSs lodged at an Office of first Entry. Number of ENS lodged at an Office of Lodgement.

Number of ENS lodged:1 - Sea transport 3,645,099 2 - Rail transport 293,478 3 - Road transport 296,179 4 - Air transport 4,691,754 5 - Postal Consignment 14 8 - Inland waterway transport 1,091 9 - Own propulsion 395

Total 8,928,010



ICS – Number of ENSs per mode of transport - 01.01.2011 and 30.04.2011

1 - Sea transport 3,645,099

41%4 - Air transport

4,691,754 53%

2 - Rail transport 293,478

3%

3 - Road transport 296,179

3%

9 - Own propulsion 395 0%

5 - Postal Consignment

14 0%

8 - Inland waterway transport

1,091 0%



ICS – Number of ENSs per mode of transport and per MS -

01.01.2011 and 30.04.2011Number of ENS (2-Rail transport)

- 20 40 60 80 100 120

LVLTPLHUFISI

EEBGSKRODEIT

CZBECYDKESFRGR

IELUMTNLPTSEUKAT

Thousands

Number of ENS (1-Sea transport)

- 200 400 600 800 1,000

UKESIT

NLFRBEDEMTROPTSI

CYBGPLGRFI

SELVLTDKEEIE

HUCZLUSKAT

Thousands



ICS – Number of ENSs per mode of transport and per MS -01.01.2011 and 30.04.2011

Number of ENS (3-Road transport)

- 50 100 150 200

BGFI

HUSI

ROEEPLESLV

GRDKLTDEATCZIT

SEBECYFRIE

LUMTNLPTSKUK

Thousands

Number of ENS (4-Air transport)

- 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

DEFRUKESPLLUBEATIT

NLHUCZSI

DKLVSEROCYIELTPT

BGEEFI

MTGRSK

Thousands



ICS – Number of ENSs per MS, per month and per mode of transport 01.01.2011 and 30.04.2011

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

1,000,000

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M04


ENS (1 - Sea transport) ENS (4 - Air transport) ENS (2 - Rail transport) ENS (3 - Road transport)ENS (5 - Postal Consignment) ENS (8 - Inland waterway transport) ENS (9 - Own propulsion)

Country Period

Data



Verification of the lodgement of Entry summary declaration

The moment of presentation of goods is the last moment when an Entry summary declaration can be provided but such cases should be really exceptional and the time limits stipulated by the legislation have to be kept.

A systematic verification if Entry summary declarations were lodged for all the goods entering the EU territory to be implemented by and performed by all the Member States.



Quality of Entry summary

declarations’ data

National administrations indicate low quality of the content of some data elements provided by traders. E.g.:

No commodity code is provided in Entry summary declaration combined with a description of goods containing only general statements such as: “Consolidated, packed, etc.

Improved results for subsequent automated risk analysis can only be obtained by changing the status of the commodity code from optional to mandatory (at least 4 positions of the combined nomenclature)

Several Member States reported also low quality of the content in relation to the ‘consignee’ and ‘consignor’ data. Significant proportion of FF to FF data (e.g. air +65%, maritime +55%) instead of real consignors/consignees prevents effective electronic risk analysis


European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Quality of Entry

summary declarations’data

For issues regulated by legislation: National administrations should cooperate with traders, to motivate them to improve the quality of Entry Summary declarations. Minimum quality standards are required before validation!

Issues not covered by legal obligations: need to be considered for changing legislation but evaluation to be done first



Example: Description of goods ~ HS code – the current content of ENSs

Mode oftransport GIVES CC

NUMBER OFEO

GOODSITEMS Pct

1 always 16 15241 10,3%

1 never 29 1148 0,8%

1 sometimes 16 131035 88,9%

4 always 1 64 0,3%

4 never 9 19070 99,7%

4 sometimes 0 0 0,0%

Commodity codeNL (May 2011):

• Sea transport: presented in 58,36% (from this 51% for 4 positions, 40% 6 positions)

• Air transport: presented in 0,02%

IT (April 2011): presented in 62,25% (from this 77% for 4 positions, 23% 6 positions)

BE (May 2011):



Export Control System Phase 2 (ECS)



ECS Operations (long-term evolution)

ECS - Volume of Movements and Errors per Year

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2007A 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011M1 > M04

Mill

ions

Mov

emen

ts a

nd m

essa

ges

Errors

Movements

Total Nrmessages

Source: CCN/TC (CS/MIS) Situation on 02/05/2011



ECS operations (monthly evolution)

ECS - Evolution of operations last 13 months

886 865 971 956

860

983 993 999 893 854

977

1,120

973

1.80%

1.28%

0.98%

0.62%0.49% 0.52%

0.94%0.84%

0.74%

1.04%1.11%

0.87%

0.66%

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Apr.2010

May.2010

Jun.2010

Jul.2010

Aug.2010

Sep.2010

Oct.2010

Nov.2010

Dec.2010

Jan.2011

Feb.2011

Mar.2011

Apr.2011

x 10

00 m

ovem

ents

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

erro

r rat

eGoods released for export (IE501) error rate (% of all msg)

Source: CCN/TC (CS/MIS)



ECS in April 2011

Since the start of ECS (January 2007), 70 millions messages were

exchanged on the Common Domain (25 mio. movements).

The number of movements released per week (~255.000) keeps

increasing slightly (+6% compared to October 2010) .

The average error rate (0.63%) is improving, and could be lower if some

punctual errors with no business impact could be avoided.

The availability of the ECS remains above 98% in Feb 2011.



19

ECS & Exit summarydeclarations (EXS)

In operations for 24 MS

Coming soon: LU (2011Q2)EL (2011Q4)

No business case: IE.

MSSpecifications

provided to Traders

Possibility for traders to send EXS (msg IE615) (since …)

AT YES YES - 01/09/2009BE YES YESBG YES YES - 01/07/2009CY YES YES (end 2010)CZ YES YES - 01/07/2009DE YES YES - 27/06/2010DK YES YESEE YES YES - 01/07/2009EL YES 2011 Q4ES YES YES - 15/12/2010FI YES YES - 14/12/2009FR YES YES - 31/12/2010 for EDI (DTI later)HU YES YES - 29/10/2009IE NO NOIT YES YES - 31/12/2010LT YES YES - 30/04/2010LU YES First half 2011LV YES YES - 01/07/2009MT YES YES - 31/10/2010NL YES YES - 31/01/2010PL YES YES - 08/11/2010PT YES YES - 01/06/2010RO NO YES for EXS (but not as IE615)SE YES YESSI YES YES - 22/12/2010SK YES YESUK YES YES - 01/07/2009



Number of EXS per month, per MS (Ext.Domain)

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03

2011

M01

2011

M02

2011

M03


Sum of Number of EXSs lodged at the Office of Exit Sum of Number of EXS lodged at an Office of Lodgement



Title of presentation

Subtitle

Economic Operators’ System(EOS)



EOS-EORI: Status on 27.04.2011

2.718.000 EORI records175.000 EORI request via web service (Mar 2010)51.000 new EORI records (Mar 2010)

8.900 AEO Applications in total5.900 AEO Certificates in total459 mandatory consultation started74 prejudicial information sent in total



2- MCC/MCCIP

Where are we?



Challenges

Possible inconsistencies

between processes and

provisions

Possible inconsistencies

between processes and

provisions

Comitology291

Comitology291

Developments of IT by

stakeholders

Developments of IT by

stakeholders

Scarcity of resources

Scarcity of resources

Delegation290

Delegation290

Air cargo security

Air cargo security

CrisisCrisis

Legal deadlinesLegal deadlines

MCC Implementation



Options

OPTION 1Application of MCC/MCCIP in June 2013 without new IT systems

OPTION 2Amendment of MCC to align it on the Lisbon Treaty correct it and

postpone its application

For a number of reasons, there seems to be a consensus around option 2



Consequences

Continuation of the current work on BPM and on the substance of the provisions

Submission (before end of 2011) to the EP and Council of a proposal to amend the MCC before 24.6.2013 in order:

- To introduce new procedures for adoption and restructure MCC in order to allow a split of MCCIP between delegated and implementing acts

- To correct, where appropriate, some provisions- To fix new deadline(s), depending on the processes to be computerised or

conditions for application

Such postponement should be supported by a comprehensive programme of IT developmentProduction of guidelines


European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Legal Planning

27

2010 2011 2012

Modernised CustomsCode

MCCIP –RegulatoryProcedure withScrutiny (RS)

MCCIP –Regulatory & Management procedures

2013 2014 2015

1/03/2011 24/06/2013 ../06/201415/03/2011

Amendment MCC: - alignment- restructuring- corrections- postponement

New Comitology Regulation (Art. 291 TFEU)

Deadline Amendment

MCC

Deadline Alignment Delegation (Art. 290 TFEU)

1 singlePreliminary

draftMCCIP

Regulationfor all

comitologyprocedures

Drafting/AdoptionDelegated act

Drafting/AdoptionImplementing act

Impact ofalignment &restructured

empowerment

Phased

Applicationbased on

Programme of

IT Development



Questions???

Documents

1- Implementation of the security amendment 2- MCC/MCCIP · 2012. 6. 6. · 25 May 2011 ECG IT & legal European Commission Taxation and Customs Union 1- Implementation of the security