69
044040 Quin 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in H ong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 1

Hong Kong Shue Yan College

ECON 310

Financial Institutions in Hong Kong

Term Paper 2006 Fall

Page 2: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 2

The Comparison between the MPFs provided by

Bank (HSBC) and

Insurance Company (Manulife)

Page 3: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 3

Section 4, Group 6

• 044012 Christy, Cheung Wai Hung

• 044013 Annie, Chong Suet Yan

• 044018 Roxanne, Yu Kwan Yee

• 044028 Carrie, Ho Ka Lai

• 044040 Quin, Leung Pui Shan

• 044052 Katy, Lee Wai Kit

Page 4: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 4

Introduction of MPF

pension plan

Page 5: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 5

What is a pension plan?

– an asset pool

– represent the fastest-growing financial intermediary.

Page 6: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 6

Reasons pension plan becomes popular

– Life expectancy increase

– Ageing problem

Page 7: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 7

Type of pension plans

– Private Pension Plans

– Public pension Plan

• Sponsored by a governmental body. e.g., MPF

Page 8: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 8

Public pension Plan

Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF)

Page 9: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044052 Katy 9

Key features of the MPF

– Coverage and Exemption

• Coverage: Employee, Employer, Self-Employed Person

• Exempt persons: Domestic employees, Self-employed hawkers;

Page 10: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044052 Katy 10

Key features of the MPF

– Contributions

• Both employers and employees pay a minimum contribution of 5% of relevant income

• Self-employed persons have to contribute 5%.

Page 11: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044052 Katy 11

Key features of the MPF

• minimum and maximum levels of relevant income are:– Minimum - HK$4,000 per month

– Maximum - HK$20,000 per month

• can withdraw accrued benefits in a lump sum at the age of 65

Page 12: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044052 Katy 12

Key features of the MPF

• Immediate Vesting

Contributions paid and investment earnings are fully and vested with the member as accrued benefits.

Page 13: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044052 Katy 13

Key features of the MPF

• Portability When a member changes job, benefits can be

transferred

• Preservation Benefits will be preserved and became

payable at age of 65 or die

Page 14: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 14

Description of HSBC and Manulife

Background of HSBC

Page 15: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 15

Background of HSBC

– one of the world’s largest banking and financial services organizations

– operated in Hong Kong more than 140 years

– has over 9,700 offices in 77 countries and territories

Page 16: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 16

Background of HSBC

– The leader position in the pension market

– HSBC and subsidiary Hang Seng Bank have secured 400,000 employees for MPF

– 40% targeted market share in the MPF business.

Page 17: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 17

MPF Product in HSBC

• HSBC offers two master trust schemes

– SuperTrust

– SuperTrust Plus

Page 18: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 18

SuperTrust MPF Scheme

• members with less investment experience

• investment time frames from short to long term

Page 19: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 19

SuperTrust MPF Scheme

• 5 different funds

– Capital Preservation Fund (low-risk)– Guaranteed Fund (low-risk) – Balanced Fund (medium-risk) – Growth Fund (high-risk)– Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund (high-risk)

Page 20: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 20

SuperTrust Plus MPF Scheme

• members with a greater investment knowledge and experience

• In addition to 5 SuperTrust Funds, it offers 5 more funds

Page 21: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 21

SuperTrust Plus MPF Scheme

– Stable Growth Fund (medium-risk)– Asian Equity Fund (high-risk)– European Equity Fund (high-risk)– Hong Kong Equity Fund (high-risk)– North American Equity Fund (high-risk)

Page 22: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 22

HSBC MPF Service

• Quality MPF Management

• Keeping information up to date

• Smart Money Management and Fund Switching

Page 23: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044013 Annie 23

HSBC MPF Service

• providing convenient communication

– Hotline

– Website

– Branch and ATM network

Page 24: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 24

Description of HSBC and Manulife

Background of MAULIFE

Page 25: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 25

Background of MAULIFE

• conducts business in Hong Kong for more than 100 years

• expanded into MPF market since 2000

• one of the largest player in the MPF market (15.5% market share)

Page 26: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 26

Background of MAULIFE

• more than 720,000 pension accounts

• managing pension assets at about HK$307 billion

Page 27: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 27

MPF Product in MANULIFE

• Two MPF schemes

• Manu-Lifestyle (MPF) Scheme

• Manulife Global Select (MPF) Scheme

Page 28: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 28

Manu-Lifestyle (MPF) Scheme

• provided to conservative investors

• Simple and efficient approach

Page 29: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 29

Manu-Lifestyle (MPF) Scheme

• 5 different Funds

– Capital Preservation Fund– Interest Fund– Stable Fund– Growth Fund– Aggressive Fund

Page 30: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 30

Manulife Global Select (MPF) Scheme

• provided to sophisticated and conservative investors

• offers a choice of investment expertise and extensive range of funds

Page 31: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 31

Manulife Global Select (MPF) Scheme

• provides eleven more funds than Manu-lifestyle Scheme

• provide a very aggressive high-risk option

– Manulife MPF China Value Fund

Page 32: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 32

Manulife MPF Service

• computerized call center

• personal visits

• customer-oriented seminars

Page 33: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044018 Roxanne 33

Manulife MPF Service

• Newsletters

• regular benefit statements

• on-line service centre

• Smart Call telephone service.

Page 34: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 34

Comparison between the MPF Scheme of HSBC and Manulife

Page 35: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 35

III. Comparison between the MPF Scheme of HSBC and Manulife

• Two MPF Scheme

– Low-risk Fund– Medium-risk Fund– Aggressive High-risk Fund

Page 36: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 36

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Page 37: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 37

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• provided to conservative investors

• provided to less investment experience investor

Page 38: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 38

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Conservative Low-Risk Fund– Manulife

• Capital Preservation Fund• Interest Fund

– HSBC• Capital Preservation Funds• Guaranteed Fund

Page 39: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 39

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Capital Preservation Funds

– mandated by the MPF Schemes Ordinance

– do not have a guarantee of capital and interest

Page 40: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 40

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• invest in grade Hong Kong dollar denominated monetary instruments

Manu-lifestyle Scheme

HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Performance as at October 31 2006

Capital Preservation Fund

Capital Preservation Fund

Since Launch (%)

5.78 15

Page 41: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 41

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Manulife Capital Preservation Fund

– mainly hold Hong Kong Bonds– stable return as the prescribed savings rate published

by the MPFA

• HSBC Capital Preservation Fund

– 100% hold in Hong Kong dollar denominated monetary instrument

– achieve a rate of return higher than the average bank saving rate

Page 42: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 42

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Manu-lifestyle Scheme

HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Performance as at October 31 2006

Interest Fund Guaranteed Fund

Since Launch (%)

1.65 0.4

Page 43: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 43

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Manulife MPF Interest Fund– fully hold in Hong Kong Bonds– interest rate is determined by the bond

interest

• HSBC Guaranteed Fund– nearly 50% hold in equity– provide 0.25% interest rate per annually

Page 44: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 44

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• conservative medium-risk fund

• Manulife MPF Stable Fund vs. HSBC Balanced Fund

– Provide capital growth

Page 45: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 45

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Manu-lifestyle Scheme

HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Performance as at October 31 2006

Stable Fund Balanced Fund

Since Launch (%)

16.75 32

HSBC invest more equity than Manulife

Page 46: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 46

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Manulife MPF Stable Fund– mainly in bonds– with an interest guarantee upon the

occurrence of certain pre-determined events

• HSBC Balanced Fund– Assets Portfolio mainly in equity– No interest guarantee

Page 47: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 47

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Compare the Aggressive high-risk fund

– Manulife• Growth Fund• Aggressive Fund

– HSBC• Growth Fund• Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund

Page 48: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 48

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Manu-lifestyle Scheme

HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Performance as at October 31 2006

Growth Fund Growth Fund

Since Launch (%)

34.22 32.1

Page 49: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 49

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Growth Funds

• helped to maximize the investment return

• mainly in equity

Page 50: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 50

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Manulife Aggressive Fund vs. HSBC Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund

• Provide long term capital growth

Page 51: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 51

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Manu-lifestyle Scheme

HSBC Super Trust Scheme

Performance as at October 31 2006

Aggressive Fund Hang Seng Tracking Fund

Since Launch (%)

33.18 41.10

Better Performance of Hang Seng Index in recent year

Page 52: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044012 Christy 52

Manu-lifestyle Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Scheme

• Manulife MPF Aggressive Fund– a unitized equity fund– mainly in equities and equity-related investme

nts.

• Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund– Invest in Hang Seng Index– the performance of the Hang Seng Index

Page 53: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 53

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs.

HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

Page 54: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 54

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

– provided to a greater investment knowledge and experience investor

– offers a choice of investment expertise

– extensive range of funds

Page 55: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 55

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

• Compare the conservative low-risk fund

Manulife Global Select Scheme

Performance since launch as at October 31 2006 (%)

HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

Performance since launch as at October 31 2006 (%)

Interest Fund 1.65 Guaranteed Fund 0.4

Capital Preservation Fund

5.78 Capital Preservation Fund

15

Hong Kong Bond Fund

11.37

International Bond Fund

23.81

Page 56: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 56

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

• Different Asset Portfolio

• Manulife have more funds than HSBC

Page 57: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 57

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

• Compare the conservative medium-risk fund

Manulife Global Select Scheme

Performance since launch as at October 31 2006 (%)

HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

Performance since launch as at October 31 2006 (%)

Stable Fund 16.75 Balanced Fund 32

North American Equity Fund

-9.15 Stable Growth Fund

30.2

European Equity Fund

-3.32

International Equity Fund

8.36

Page 58: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 58

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

• Negative return in two Manulife funds– Significant loss in Asset Portfolio in North Am

erican and European

• Difference in return– Manulife mainly hold bonds– HSBC hold nearly 50% in equtiy

Page 59: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 59

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

• Compare the Aggressive high-risk fund

Manulife Global Select Scheme

Performance since launch as at October 31 2006 (%)

HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

Performance since launch as at October 31 2006 (%)

Fidelity stable Growth Fund(Launch at Sept 1 2003)

35.21 Asian Equity Fund 103.8

Growth Fund 34.22 European Equity Fund 26.8

Hong Kong Equity Fund 39.04 Growth Fund 32.1

Japan Equity Fund 27.92 Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund

41.1

Pacific Asia Equity Fund 56.34 Hong Kong Equity Fund 47.2

Fidelity Growth Fund(Launch at Sept 1 2003)

59.72 North American Equity Fund

-15.9

Aggressive Fund 33.18

China Value Fund(Launch at Feb 1 2006)

21.5

Page 60: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 60

Manulife Global Select Scheme vs. HSBC Super Trust Plus Scheme

• Negative return in HSBC funds– Significant loss in Asset Portfolio in North

American

• Significant return in HSBC Asian equity– Include in invest in China equity

• Manulife provide a stable positive return

Page 61: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 61

III. Comparison between the MPF Scheme of HSBC and Manulife

• Conclusion– Manulife Global Select Scheme and HSBC

Super Trust Plus MPF Scheme are similar.

– Manulife have provided six more funds than HSBC

– Manulife performance is on average

Page 62: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 62

III. Comparison between the MPF Services of HSBC and Manulife

• Compare these additional services of the Manulife and HSBC in the following aspects:

– Hotlines

– Website

Page 63: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 63

III. Comparison between the MPF Services of HSBC and Manulife

– Seminars

– Newsletters

– Regular benefit statements

– Other Services

Page 64: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 64

III. Comparison between the MPF Services of HSBC and Manulife

• Compare these additional services of the Manulife and HSBC in the following aspects:

– Manulife provides a wider range services

– electronic services

Page 65: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 65

IV. Comments on MPF services

• The ultimate goal

• ensuring people are adequately provided for upon reaching retirement age.

Page 66: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 66

IV. Comments on MPF services

• the choice of the MPF provider

• Chose by employer

• employee can only make the changes in the investment portfolio

Page 67: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044028 Carrie 67

IV. Comments on MPF services

• MPF Scheme Authority

– consider what purpose they want to be in the MPF Scheme

Page 68: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 68

THE END

Page 69: 1 Hong Kong Shue Yan College ECON 310 Financial Institutions in Hong Kong Term Paper 2006 Fall

044040 Quin 69

Q & A