Click here to load reader
Upload
gervais-cook
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3 GdA_CLIC meeting Motivation: Increasing interest by the Scientific Community for very compact Normal Conducting Linacs for FELs (~6 GeV, ~150m, for 1 Å wavelength). “Support for feasibility studies of new research infrastructures (i.e. Ankara University, Australian Synchrotron,….), or major upgrade of existing ones (i.e. SwissFEL,….)”. Advantages: Compactness, possibility to go high repetition rate, costs. Aims and motivations
Citation preview
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 11
Research & Innovation ActionINFRADEV-1-2014: Design studies
Project: “X-band technology for FELs (XbFEL)” Participants:1. Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste2. CERN3. Ankara University4. Australian Synchrotron - ALS5. Uppsala University6. SINAP Shangai7. Cockcroft Institute8. Solaris-Jagiellonian University- Krakow (new)9. VDLOther organizations that have manifested interest:• PSI - SwissFEL• MAXLab
HORIZON2020-Work Programme 2014 - 2015
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 22
The aim of this activity is to support the conceptual and technical design and preparatory actions for new research infrastructures, which are of a clear European dimension and interest.
Major upgrades of existing infrastructures may also be considered if the end result is intended to be equivalent to, or capable of replacing, an existing infrastructure.
Design Studies_ Specific challenge
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 33
Motivation: Increasing interest by the Scientific Community for very
compact Normal Conducting Linacs for FELs (~6 GeV, ~150m,
for 1 Å wavelength).• “Support for feasibility studies of new research infrastructures
(i.e. Ankara University, Australian Synchrotron,….), or major
upgrade of existing ones (i.e. FERMI@Elettra, SwissFEL,….)”.
Advantages: Compactness, possibility to go high repetition rate, costs.
Aims and motivationsAims and motivations
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 44
Design Studies_ Specific challenge
ObjectiveValidate the X-band technology for FEL based photon sources, with the design and assembly of an X-band accelerating module to be tested with the beam.
Focusing on:operating gradients, breakdown fault rate, alignment issues, wake fields effects, RF stability.
The module will be based on:• One RF power unit;• RF pulse compressor and WG power distribution system; • Two accelerating structures; • Diagnostics;• Mechanical supports and structure alignments.
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 55
RF phase advance
2π/3 3π/4
a/lambda 0.145 0.145
d/h 0.1313 0.1
Pt 401 MW 401 MW
Ls 1 m 1 m
# klystrons 10 10# structures 10 x 4 =
4010 x 4 = 40
a 3.62 mm 3.62 mm
d 1.09 mm 0.937 mm
vg/c 3.75 % 3.29%
tp 90 ns 102 ns
Qe 18000 19000
Constant Impedance Accelerating Structure with input power coupler only
A. Grudiev, HG2013 workshop
X-band module layoutX-band module layout
P CRF load
Klystron
Pulse compressor
Hybrid
HV Modulator
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 66
If possible the X-band module would be installed at CERN CLIC Test Facility (detailed plans to be done when the project will be well defined).
Besides the gradient and the fault rate tests, this choice would also allow extensive beam tests with the CALIFES beam*.
Use of the existing diagnostics with an adequate upgrading (i.e. an X-band deflecting cavity….).
The objective is the evaluation of the beam brightness degradation due to wake fields, misalignments, etc.
Installations and tests
* May be at a reduced charge to improve the emittance
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 77
Sub systems Objective Note Institute
1 RF source: Modulator & Klystron
One modulator with a single CPI VKX 8311 klystron 50 MW, 1.5 s, 50 (100 Hz).
Would it be possible to use a CERN X-box in the CTF3 area?
2 LLRF systemAmplitude stab. ≤ 1E-3;Phase stab. ≤ 0.3° X
Start with a standard architecture (i.e. FERMI X-band LLRF system).Improve the phase stability≤ 0.1° X (Swiss FEL ≤ 0.07° X)
3 Waveguide system and RF compression Igor design
Preliminary beam parameter Value Note
Charge/pulse ~ 250 pCPulse length ~1 ps
Normalized emittance ? Check Califes beam with 250 pC or lower
Repetition rate and pulse structure 1-50 (100) Hz
Single bunch
Few bunches (N?)
RF station characteristics
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 88
Work packages Objective Note Institute
4 Accelerating structureG ≥ 60 MV/m;Fault rate ≤ 3E-7 (CLIC reference)
5 Beam steering and alignment
Pre-alignment ≤ 50 mFine adjust. ≤ 10 m
6 Beam diagnostics
Deflecting cavity and dispersive section for slice beam analysis;S or X-band deflector?
Deflecting cavity and dispersive section for slice beam analysis;S or X-band deflector?
7 Beam tests and measurements
EnergyEnergy spread EmittanceWakes
- Possibility to use the CTF3 area and the Califes beam (still to be discussed).- Beam requirements (for new tests and meas.) vs. the available beam from Califes.
RF station characteristics II
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 99
Presentation outline
Submission forms for:
- Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) (Version 1.0, 21 March 2014)
- Administrative forms (Part A)
- Research proposal (Part B)
Evaluation process and award criteria
Research and Innovation Action
For the submission form template see at:http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/call_ptef/pt/h2020-call-pt-ria-ia_en.pdf
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1010
1. General information- Abstract- Declarations
i.e. The coordinator declares to have the explicit consent of all applicants on their participation and on the content of this proposal, ……………
2. Participants & contacts- Administrative data of participating organizations
i.e. Legal Status of organization, Departments carrying out the proposed work, Person in charge of the proposal, …………..
3. Budget- Budget for the proposal
4. Ethics- Ethics issues table
5. Call-specific questions
Part A_Administrative forms
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1111
Part B_Research proposal (Technical Annex)
Note:The cover page and sections 1, 2 and 3 together should not be longer than 100 pages (note that the standard limit for other Research and Innovation Actions is 70 pages). All tables in these sections must be included within the limit of 100 pages.
Please be aware that proposals will be evaluated as they were submitted, rather than on their potential if certain changes were to be made. This means that only proposals that successfully address all the required aspects will have a chance of being funded.
The Technical Annex is based on five sections:
1. Excellence2. Impact3. Implementation4. Members of the consortium5. Ethics and Security
Very important for theevaluation process and
award criteria
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1212
XbFEL Work Packages (proposed)
WP1_Management
WP2_FEL Users requirements and applications
WP3_X-band accelerating module design
WP4_Accelerating module construction and installation
WP5_Beam tests
WP6_Dissemination and exploitation of the results
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1313
Work package description
Work package number 1 Start date or starting event
Work package title MGT, Management of XbFEL Design StudyParticipant number
Short name of participant
Person-months per beneficiary:
Objectivesi.e. - General governance of XbFEL Design Study, including scientific and administrative management.- Handling and distribution of funds.- ………………..
Description of work(where appropriate, broken down into tasks, lead partner and role of participants)i.e.T1.1 Control of Design Study to enforce rules, support work-packages and tasks approved by EC as well as the timely reporting by all partners. Supervision and the contact with the Commission will be assured during the whole Design Study.T1.2 …………………….
Deliverables(brief description and month delivery)i.e.D1.1 Homepage XbFEL – public web site (month 4)D1.2 Audited financial reporting (month 36)D1.3 …………………………
Table 3.1a:Work packagedescription
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1414
Scoring Scores must be in the range 0-5. Half marks may be given. Evaluators will be asked to score proposals as they were submitted, rather than on their potential if certain changes were to be made. When an evaluator identifies significant shortcomings, he or she must reflect this by awarding a lower score for the criterion concerned. Thresholds The threshold for individual criteria is 3. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, is 10.
Evaluation process
1. Excellence2. Impact3. Quality and efficiency of implementation
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1515
Evaluation process and award criteria
1. Excellence
• Clarity of the objectives;
• Credibility of the proposed approach;
• Soundness of the concept, including trans-disciplinary considerations;
• Extend that proposed work is ambitious, has innovation potential and is beyond the state of the art (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches).
Score 1: Threshold 3/5
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1616
2. Impact(….. contribution to:)
• The expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic;
• Enhancing innovation capacity and integration of new knowledge;
• Strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets, and where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets;
• …measures to, disseminate and exploit the project results,… communication.
Score 2: Threshold 3/5
Evaluation process and award criteria
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1717
3. Quality and efficiency of implementation*
Coherence and effectiveness of work plan, … allocation of tasks,
resources;
Competences, experience and complementarity of the individual
participants, as well as of the consortium as a whole;
Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures,
including risk and innovation management.
* Experts will also be asked to assess the operational capacity of applicants to carry out the proposed work.
Score 3: Threshold 3/5
Evaluation process and award criteria
GdA_CLIC meeting 11-04-2014 1818
Next steps (within the next 2-3 weeks)
• Identify a reference/contact person representing each Institution. These persons will supply all the information concerning their Institutions and will be actively involved in the proposal preparation (part A and B).
• Define the contribution of each participant (in terms of role, manpower, components, etc.), for the Work Packages (WP) and budget preparation.
• Identify the WP leaders for their organization and preparation in terms of objectives, description of work and deliverables.