26
1 EPR Assessment EPR Assessment

1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

1

EPR AssessmentEPR Assessment

Page 2: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

2

OverviewOverview Review Of Epr For SMSgt ClimberReview Of Epr For SMSgt Climber

Section I: Ratee Identification DataSection I: Ratee Identification Data Section II: Job DescriptionSection II: Job Description Section III: Evaluation Of PerformanceSection III: Evaluation Of Performance Section IV: Promotion RecommendationSection IV: Promotion Recommendation Section V: Rater’s CommentsSection V: Rater’s Comments Appropriate BulletsAppropriate Bullets Inappropriate BulletsInappropriate Bullets

Overall Instructor AssessmentOverall Instructor Assessment EPR comparison (SrA Harris)EPR comparison (SrA Harris)

Page 3: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

3

(Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)

I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC

5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID

7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORTFrom: Thru:

II. JOB DESCRIPTION1. DUTY TITLE

2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)

Inefficient. Anunprofessionalperformer.

Good performer.Performs routine duties satisfactorily.

Excellent performer.Consistently produceshigh quality work.

The exception.Absolutely superiorin all areas.

2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)

Lacking. Needsconsiderable improvement.

Sufficient. Gets jobaccomplished

Extensive knowledge ofall primary duties andrelated positions.

Excels in knowledge ofall related positions.Mastered all duties.

3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards,evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)

Ineffective.Gets satisfactory results.

Highly effectiveleader.

Exceptionallyeffective leader.

4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)

Ineffective.Manages resourcesin a satisfactory manner.

Skillful andcompetent.

Dynamic, capitalizeson all opportunities.

5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)

Poor. Sound.Emphasizes logic anddecision making.

Highly respected and skilled.

6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES

Unprofessional,unreliable. Meets expectations.

Sets an example forothers to follow.

Epitomizes the AirForce professional.

7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)

Unable to communicateeffectively.

Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.

Organizes and expressesideas clearly andconcisely.

Highly skilled writerand communicator.

AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)

Page 4: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

4

FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY

I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)

1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC

5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID

7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT

From: 1 Jan Thru: 31 Dec

Climber, Cliff R. 123-45-6789 SMSgt

ANNUAL

2A690

20th Bomb Squadron, ACC, Fogler AFB OR 12345 MXOBR549 OJ2MG

365

Page 5: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

5

(Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)

I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC

5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID

7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORTFrom: Thru:

II. JOB DESCRIPTION1. DUTY TITLE

2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)

Inefficient. Anunprofessionalperformer.

Good performer.Performs routine duties satisfactorily.

Excellent performer.Consistently produceshigh quality work.

The exception.Absolutely superiorin all areas.

2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)

Lacking. Needsconsiderable improvement.

Sufficient. Gets jobaccomplished

Extensive knowledge ofall primary duties andrelated positions.

Excels in knowledge ofall related positions.Mastered all duties.

3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards,evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)

Ineffective.Gets satisfactory results.

Highly effectiveleader.

Exceptionallyeffective leader.

4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)

Ineffective.Manages resourcesin a satisfactory manner.

Skillful andcompetent.

Dynamic, capitalizeson all opportunities.

5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)

Poor. Sound.Emphasizes logic anddecision making.

Highly respected and skilled.

6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES

Unprofessional,unreliable. Meets expectations.

Sets an example forothers to follow.

Epitomizes the AirForce professional.

7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)

Unable to communicateeffectively.

Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.

Organizes and expressesideas clearly andconcisely.

Highly skilled writerand communicator.

AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)

Page 6: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

6

NCOIC, Sortie Support Flight

Supervises 24 People. Responsible for effective management of 2 facilities, 4 vehicles, and equipment account valued more than $5 million. Ensures capability to receive, inspect, store, and maintain over 350 line items. Provides guidance and establishes training standards necessary for effective planning and scheduling of all Sortie Support Flight functions in support of operational and contingency requirements. Ensures expedient completion of all Time Compliance Technical Orders. Establishes accountability for all aircraft training devises. Enforces safety and supply discipline. ADDITIONAL DUTY: Squadron Performance Measures Coordinator.

II. JOB DESCRIPTION

1. DUTY TITLE

2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Page 7: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

7

(Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)

I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC

5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID

7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORTFrom: Thru:

II. JOB DESCRIPTION1. DUTY TITLE

2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)

Inefficient. Anunprofessionalperformer.

Good performer.Performs routine duties satisfactorily.

Excellent performer.Consistently produceshigh quality work.

The exception.Absolutely superiorin all areas.

2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)

Lacking. Needsconsiderable improvement.

Sufficient. Gets jobaccomplished

Extensive knowledge ofall primary duties andrelated positions.

Excels in knowledge ofall related positions.Mastered all duties.

3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards,evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)

Ineffective.Gets satisfactory results.

Highly effectiveleader.

Exceptionallyeffective leader.

4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)

Ineffective.Manages resourcesin a satisfactory manner.

Skillful andcompetent.

Dynamic, capitalizeson all opportunities.

5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)

Poor. Sound.Emphasizes logic anddecision making.

Highly respected and skilled.

6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES

Unprofessional,unreliable. Meets expectations.

Sets an example forothers to follow.

Epitomizes the AirForce professional.

7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)

Unable to communicateeffectively.

Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.

Organizes and expressesideas clearly andconcisely.

Highly skilled writerand communicator.

AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)

Page 8: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

8

1

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION

V. RATER’S COMMENTS

(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )

RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED

NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME

CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATEPROMOTION

RATER’SRECOMMENDATION

RATER’S RATER’S RECOMMENDATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)SIGNATURE

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS CONCUR NONCONCUR

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR

VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)

X. COMMANDER’S REVIEWABCD

SENIOR RATERSENIOR RATER’S DEPUTYINTERMEDIATE LEVELLOWER LEVEL

YES

NO

Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

Page 9: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

9AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (REVERSE) (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)

VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS

1

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION

V. RATER’S COMMENTS

(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )

RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED

NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME

CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATEPROMOTION

RATER’SRECOMMENDATION

RATER’S RATER’S RECOMMENDATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)SIGNATURE

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS CONCUR NONCONCUR

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR

VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)

X. COMMANDER’S REVIEWABCD

SENIOR RATERSENIOR RATER’S DEPUTYINTERMEDIATE LEVELLOWER LEVEL

YES

NO

Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

Page 10: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

10

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments

Start with a strong impact statement!Start with a strong impact statement!

Single-handedly spearheaded squadron ORI Single-handedly spearheaded squadron ORI preparations, ensured "Outstanding" rating in preparations, ensured "Outstanding" rating in June 200X ORIJune 200X ORI

Page 11: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

11

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments - Personally created inspection checklists for all - Personally created inspection checklists for all

sections to ensure compliance with established sections to ensure compliance with established directivesdirectives

- Allowed sections to teach other sections their - Allowed sections to teach other sections their processes; improved working relations between processes; improved working relations between sections sections

-- Increased efficiency, eliminated duplication of -- Increased efficiency, eliminated duplication of effort, saved over $26,000...decreased equipment effort, saved over $26,000...decreased equipment support by 25%, pre-flight inspection times by support by 25%, pre-flight inspection times by 50%, post-flight inspections by 33%, and no-shows 50%, post-flight inspections by 33%, and no-shows by 73%by 73%

Page 12: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

12

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments Constantly striving to improve quality of life for all Constantly striving to improve quality of life for all

members of the unit; personally undertook members of the unit; personally undertook challenge of reducing dormitory problems...rid the challenge of reducing dormitory problems...rid the dormitory of all incidents of underage dormitory of all incidents of underage drinking/property damagedrinking/property damage

-- Incorporated inputs from dormitory members to -- Incorporated inputs from dormitory members to ensure all issues were addressed; morale ensure all issues were addressed; morale skyrocketedskyrocketed

- - First dormitory to be selected Dorm of the - - First dormitory to be selected Dorm of the Month; showcase for other units on base to emulateMonth; showcase for other units on base to emulate

Page 13: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

13

- Instilled pride of ownership across all sections; - Instilled pride of ownership across all sections; ensured all personnel in customer service positions ensured all personnel in customer service positions received customer service training--decreased received customer service training--decreased customer wait time and increased customer customer wait time and increased customer satisfaction satisfaction

- Greatly enhanced civil-military relations…delivered - Greatly enhanced civil-military relations…delivered a riveting presentation and was lauded by civic a riveting presentation and was lauded by civic leadersleaders

- Selected SNCO of the year--exemplifies core values - Selected SNCO of the year--exemplifies core values and instills pride--promote to CMSgt immediately!and instills pride--promote to CMSgt immediately!

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments

Page 14: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

14

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments Weak comments would include:Weak comments would include:

- Elected President of Wing Top 3 organization, - Elected President of Wing Top 3 organization, making the organization more responsive to making the organization more responsive to enlisted personnel and community partnershipsenlisted personnel and community partnerships

-- Organized the Top 3 children's Haunted House, -- Organized the Top 3 children's Haunted House, manned the refreshment booth at the base picnicmanned the refreshment booth at the base picnic

-- Organized renovation efforts for Bear Creek -- Organized renovation efforts for Bear Creek Elementary School, hard work praised by school Elementary School, hard work praised by school leadershipleadership

Page 15: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

15

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments

- Spearheaded squadron pre-inspection barbecue to - Spearheaded squadron pre-inspection barbecue to reward efforts of all members for preparation reward efforts of all members for preparation effortsefforts

- POC for Wing POW/MIA day; largest crowd - POC for Wing POW/MIA day; largest crowd ever...emotional day of remembrance carried out ever...emotional day of remembrance carried out to perfectionto perfection

Page 16: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

16

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments

Inappropriate comments include:Inappropriate comments include:

- Submitted for Meritorious Service Medal for his - Submitted for Meritorious Service Medal for his consistently superior efforts and outstanding consistently superior efforts and outstanding resultsresults

Page 17: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

17

Feedback DatesFeedback Dates

Midpoint Feedback: 17 Jul Midpoint Feedback: 17 Jul

Page 18: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

18

1

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION

V. RATER’S COMMENTS

(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )

RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED

NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME

CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATEPROMOTION

RATER’SRECOMMENDATION

RATER’S RATER’S RECOMMENDATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)SIGNATURE

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS CONCUR NONCONCUR

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR

VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)

X. COMMANDER’S REVIEWABCD

SENIOR RATERSENIOR RATER’S DEPUTYINTERMEDIATE LEVELLOWER LEVEL

YES

NO

Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS

Page 19: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

19

Overall Instructor Overall Instructor AssessmentAssessment

RA134

AF

67

RA134

AF

67

RA134

AF

67

RA134AF

67

Page 20: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

20

Mediocre EPRMediocre EPR

What would a “middle-of-the-What would a “middle-of-the-road” performer’s EPR look like?road” performer’s EPR look like?

Page 21: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

21

(Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty)

I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item)1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC

5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID

7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORTFrom: Thru:

II. JOB DESCRIPTION1. DUTY TITLE

2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed)

Inefficient. Anunprofessionalperformer.

Good performer.Performs routine duties satisfactorily.

Excellent performer.Consistently produceshigh quality work.

The exception.Absolutely superiorin all areas.

2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge)

Lacking. Needsconsiderable improvement.

Sufficient. Gets jobaccomplished

Extensive knowledge ofall primary duties andrelated positions.

Excels in knowledge ofall related positions.Mastered all duties.

3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards,evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork)

Ineffective.Gets satisfactory results.

Highly effectiveleader.

Exceptionallyeffective leader.

4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources)

Ineffective.Manages resourcesin a satisfactory manner.

Skillful andcompetent.

Dynamic, capitalizeson all opportunities.

5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions)

Poor. Sound.Emphasizes logic anddecision making.

Highly respected and skilled.

6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES

Unprofessional,unreliable. Meets expectations.

Sets an example forothers to follow.

Epitomizes the AirForce professional.

7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas)

Unable to communicateeffectively.

Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily.

Organizes and expressesideas clearly andconcisely.

Highly skilled writerand communicator.

AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO)

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT)

Page 22: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

22

1

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION

V. RATER’S COMMENTS

(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities )

RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED

NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME

CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATEPROMOTION

RATER’SRECOMMENDATION

RATER’S RATER’S RECOMMENDATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77)SIGNATURE

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS CONCUR NONCONCUR

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

DUTY TITLE DATE

SSN SIGNATURE

CONCUR NONCONCUR

VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE(N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee)

X. COMMANDER’S REVIEWABCD

SENIOR RATERSENIOR RATER’S DEPUTYINTERMEDIATE LEVELLOWER LEVEL

YES

NO

Last feedback was conducted on: ______________.

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION

Page 23: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

23

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments- Received laudatory comments for response to - Received laudatory comments for response to

a mobility exercise scenarioa mobility exercise scenario

-- Flawlessly processed over 50 Emergency -- Flawlessly processed over 50 Emergency Notification Data Cards for mobility personnelNotification Data Cards for mobility personnel

-- Contributed directly to squadron earning -- Contributed directly to squadron earning overall "Excellent" ratingoverall "Excellent" rating

- Innovative customer service representative- Innovative customer service representative

-- Devised new method for recording customer -- Devised new method for recording customer requestrequest

-- Reduced customer waiting time by 25 -- Reduced customer waiting time by 25 percentpercent

Page 24: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

24

Rater’s CommentsRater’s Comments- Accomplished checklist to compare current - Accomplished checklist to compare current

operating procedures with governing regulationsoperating procedures with governing regulations -- Found and corrected several problem areas -- Found and corrected several problem areas

reducing time lost due to duplication of effortsreducing time lost due to duplication of efforts- Completed Community College of the Air Force - Completed Community College of the Air Force

English courseEnglish course -- Improved her written communications skills-- Improved her written communications skills -- Reduced grammatical errors on correspondence-- Reduced grammatical errors on correspondence- Completed Airman Leadership School...improved - Completed Airman Leadership School...improved

overall knowledge for the Air Forceoverall knowledge for the Air Force- Displays behavior appropriate for a senior airman; - Displays behavior appropriate for a senior airman;

recommend for promotionrecommend for promotion

Page 25: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

25

SummarySummary Review Of Epr For SMSgt ClimberReview Of Epr For SMSgt Climber

Section I: Ratee Identification Data (Not Section I: Ratee Identification Data (Not Assessed)Assessed)

Section II: Job Description (Not Assessed)Section II: Job Description (Not Assessed) Section III: Evaluation Of PerformanceSection III: Evaluation Of Performance Section IV: Promotion RecommendationSection IV: Promotion Recommendation Section V: Rater’s CommentsSection V: Rater’s Comments Appropriate BulletsAppropriate Bullets Inappropriate BulletsInappropriate Bullets

Overall Instructor AssessmentOverall Instructor Assessment EPR ComparisonEPR Comparison

Page 26: 1 EPR Assessment. 2 Overview u Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation

26

EPR AssessmentEPR Assessment