Upload
roberta-leonard
View
216
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Department of Agriculture,Department of Agriculture,Environmental Affairs and Rural Environmental Affairs and Rural
DevelopmentDevelopmentKWAZULU-NATALKWAZULU-NATAL
2010/11 Close-out Report 2010/11 Close-out Report
&&
2011/12 First quarter expenditure 2011/12 First quarter expenditure
onon
Land Care Programme: Poverty Relief and Land Care Programme: Poverty Relief and Infrastructure Development GrantInfrastructure Development Grant
Presented to Select Committee on AppropriationsPresented to Select Committee on Appropriations
2
Content
Objectives of the programme 2010/11 Audited outcome 2011/12 – Quarter One
Expenditure analysis 2011-12 project list 2011-12 Quarter 1 service delivery Monitoring and evaluation Challenges and remedial steps
The Goal and objectives of the Programme
The goal of the Land Care Programme: Poverty Relief and Infrastructure Development Grant is to: enhance a sustainable conservation of natural
resources through community based participatory approach;
create job opportunities through the Expanded Public Works programme;
Skills transfer; and improve food security within previously
disadvantaged communities to enhance sustainable livelihoods.
3
4
2010-11 Audited outcome The department received the total allocated amount of R 8, 721m. Actual expenditure of R8.245 million or 94.5%, resulting in under-
expenditure of R476,000. Under-expenditure relates to the irrigation scheme for the Zwathi
project in Zululand that could not be finalised before year-end. The department has received confirmation that the roll-over
request has been approved.
Summary of Land Care grant
R'000
Amount
allocated
Amount
received
Unaudited
Actual
2010/11
Under /
(Over)
Expenditure
% Spent
Land Care 8,721 8,721 8,245 476 94.5%
5
2011-12: Quarter One
Quarter 1 scheduled amount of R925,000 was received. Low actual expenditure of R173,000 or 19% of Quarter 1 transfer
due to: Projects commencing one month late, due to delay in signing off the funding
agreement between project beneficiaries and department. Quarter 1 expenditure is for one month (May) only as claims for June received
and processed during July. Some delays in the procurement of required goods such as tools, fencing and
protective clothing also affected expenditure and targets. The actual expenditure in quarter 1 represents 2% of total budget.
At same stage in 2010/11, expenditure was at 12%. Department is however confident that it will be able to catch up on
the expenditure over remaining three quarters.
Summary of Land Care grant - Quarter 1: 2011/12
R'000
2011/12
DoRA
allocation
Roll-over
2011/12
Adjusted
Budget
Amount
scheduled
for transfer
in Quarter 1
Amount
received in
Quarter 1
Actual
expenditure
Quarter 1
Under /
(Over)
Expenditure
for Quarter 1
% spent for
Quarter 1
% Spent of
total budget
2011/12
% Spent as
at Quarter 1
2010/11
1 2 3=(1+2) 4 5 6 7 = (5-6) 8 = (6/5) 9 = (6/3) 10
Land Care 9,244 476 9,720 925 925 173 752 19% 2% 12%
2011-12 Project ListNO PROJECT NAME OBJECTIVE NO OF
BENEFICIARIES (Direct)
BUDGET ALLOCATION
1 EviviAlien plant control - veld management to improve grazing potential
20R460,840
2 HlalaneniClearing of bush encroachment for crop production using conservation agriculture principals
20
R762,770
3 SidohoAlien plant control - veld management to improve grazing potential
20
R580,700
4 MashumiAlien plant control - veld management to improve grazing potential
22
R758,866
5 ManungakhombiAlien plant control - veld management to improve grazing potential
35
R1,511,974
6 MthandeniAlien plant control in Canal and catchment areas-to improve water availability for agriculture
25
R544,000
7 SakhubunyeAlien plant control - veld management to improve grazing potential
40
R1,136,650
8 BonokuhleAlien plant control - veld management to improve grazing potential
20
R963,200
9 Junior LandCarePrincipals for natural resources management at school level - learners and educators
120 learners
R1,525,000
10Civil Society Mobilization Plan
Creation of awareness of natural resources management amongst funded livestock associations and traditional authority.
870
R1,000,000
Total
R9 244 0006
Performance indicators – Quarter 1PROJECT NAME PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MEASURE
UNITANNUAL TARGET QUARTER 1
TARGETACTUAL PERFORMACE :QUARTER 1
VARIANCE EXPLANATION
Evivi Alien plant control in
grazing areahectares 45 new
300 follow-up control10ha75ha
10ha70ha
5ha
Data covers only May, infestation is low
Hlalaneni
Alien plant control in gazing area
Conservation agriculture
practices
hectares 28 new80 follow-up control 40 crop
5ha15ha
1ha
5ha15ha
Data covers only May, project concentrating on planting of crops
Sidoho
Alien plant control in grazing area
Fencing of perimeter
Hectares kilometres
97 new clearing141 follow-up control4.7 km fencing
15ha 20ha
8ha 7ha 20ha
Data covers only May, new clearing is high infestation, awaiting delivery of fencing material
Mashumi
Alien plant control in grazing area
Fencing of perimeter
Hectares kilometres
300 follow-up control2.3 km fencing
75ha 20ha
55ha Data covers only May, follow-up medium.
Manungakhombi
Alien plant control in grazing area
Fencing of perimeter
Hectares kilometres
439 follow-up control 80ha 29ha 51ha Data covers only May, awaiting delivery of fencing.
Mthandeni
Alien plant control in catchment area
Stabilization of collapsing canal
Hectares
50 new clearing50 follow-up control
8ha 8ha
4ha 4ha 8ha
Data covers only May
Sakhubunye
Alien plant control in grazing area
Fencing of perimeter
Hectares kilometres
331 new clearing216 follow-up clearing 12.5 km fencing
60ha 70ha
7ha 53ha 70ha
Data covers only May
Bonokuhle Fencing of perimeter kilometres 15 km fencing 2km 0 2km Data covers only May, project
awaiting fencing material
7
Comment: Most of the projects would have met their quarterly target. had it not been for the delay in project implementation and procurement of some items.
Monitoring and Evaluation The Department engages on the following
processes for monitoring and evaluation purposes:
Community engagement and participation, for their buy-in.
Frequent project visits and preparation of monthly and quarterly reports.
Presentation of these reports to projects meeting chaired by the MEC.
Address all challenges experienced timeously to ensure successful implementation. 8
Challenges and remedial steps Challenges
Delay in signing the funding agreement resulted in one month delay Procurement delays ( Due to new SCM process adopted by the
Department)
Remedial steps Consideration given to increase the labour team to meet the individual
project targets Department is working towards standing contracts (Protective Clothing)
for essential implementing items which will alleviate procurement challenges.
In the current year contract for Fencing, Engineering work and Infrastructure in general has been entered into for a period of 2 years, this will speed up service delivery
9
10
Thank You!Thank You!Siyabonga!Siyabonga!