50

1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 2: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 3: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 4: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 5: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan

i

Page 6: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 7: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 8: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 9: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 10: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 11: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 12: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 13: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 14: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 15: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 16: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 17: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 18: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 19: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 20: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 21: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 22: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 23: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 24: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 25: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 26: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 27: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 28: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 29: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 30: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 31: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 32: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 33: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 34: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan

' '

'

'

'

'

I ' '

I '

'

Page 35: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 36: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 37: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 38: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 39: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 40: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 41: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 42: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 43: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 44: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan

adequate channel depth. The final source of delay, and the one that would be affected by a barge shelf, is the delay caused when towboats and ships are expected to meet at specific points in the Upper Bay segment of the ship channel. An example is the turn in the channel approximately one mile west of the junction between the CCSC and La Quinta Channel (Station 594+00). Pilots avoid meeting tow operators at this point by delaying. The Port Aransas Pilots estimate the incident of delays to be one out of every three ship movements. The average delay time was placed at 15 minutes. For the year 2000, 1254 incidents were estimated for a total of 313 .5 hours delay time 1 .

The reductions in transportation cost for deep-draft vessels associated with the barge shelf feature were calculated using the annual delay reduction of $250,000 (Economic Appendix). Under this scenario the incident of delay remains at one per three movements. Vessel traffic is forecasted to increase by one percent per year. The equivalent annual benefits for the SO-year

period of economic evaluation were estimated at $309,453. The consensus of the deep-draft

pilots was that two-thirds of the delay costs that they incur due to barge traffic would be alleviated by widening the deep-draft channel to 530 feet and one-third of the delays that the deep-draft vessels realize would be used by the barge shelf alone.

To determine savings for tow barges, representatives of three major tow-operating companies that regularly use the Corpus Christi Ship Channel were interviewed concerning the interaction between towboats and deep-draft vessels in the Upper Bay reach of the Corpus Channel. Of the three operators, two said that tow vessels delay, or "hold up", due to deep-draft vessel traffic between 30 and 33 percent of the time. The third company representative said that their operators indicated that they delay movements about 5 percent of the time. The estimated delay times were between IO and 15 minutes. This information suggests that annual towboat delays are approximately $23,600. The annual delay cost was calculated using a 2-barge tow

consisting of 195- by 35-f oot barges and a 1,200 horsepower towboat and the annual tow trip forecast presented in Table 13 . Examination of the barge fleet associated with study region transits showed that this tow size is representative of average tow dimensions. Table 14 presents a summary of the total benefits from the barge shelf

I Letter dated October 9, 2001 from the Port Aransas Pilots association to the Galveston District.

36

1 1 '

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

• 1 . , . . I

• I • I . ,

I

• l !

I l l

I ' .

Page 45: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 46: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 47: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 48: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 49: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan
Page 50: 1. Corpus Christi FEIS Vol 1 Project Plan