1. Control Systems

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    1/27

    FEEDBACK AND

    CONTROL SYSTEMEE 179

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    2/27

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    3/27

    Control Making subject X do task Y.

    Manual Control

    Has human-machine

    interface. e.g.:

    Driving a car

    Manipulating a crane

    Turning a voltage supply

    to a desired level.

    Automatic Control

    Machine-machine

    interface. e.g.:

    Rice cooker

    Thermostat

    Disk drives

    Aircraft control Satellites

    Moon landing

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    4/27

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    5/27

    Control Systems

    Consists of subsystems and processes assembled for thepurpose of controlling the outputs of the processes.

    Example:

    Automatic Aircraft Landing System (ALS): Radar Unit (sensors)measures the aircraft position

    Controllerdecides the aircraft commands based on the radar output.

    Aircraftexecute commands sent from the controller.

    Radar Controller Transmitter

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    6/27

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    7/27

    Response Characteristics

    Control Systems provides output/response from a given

    stimulus

    Ex. When the 4thfloor button of an elevator is pushed

    from the ground floor, the elevator rises with a passenger-

    comfortable speed and accuracy.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    8/27

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    9/27

    Response Characteristics (cont.)

    2. There is a difference in the input and the output.

    After the transient response, the physical system approaches to steady-

    state response.

    Caused by the accuracy of the elevator leveling with the floor.

    The difference is called the steady-state error.

    Steady-state errors:

    Does exist not only in defective systems.

    Often inherent in the designed systems.

    The control systems engineer determines if error is tolerable or not.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    10/27

    System Configuration:

    Open-Loop Systems

    Does not compensate for disturbance

    Only commanded by the input More stable

    Can only perform well if calibrated

    Easier to build

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    11/27

    System Configuration:

    Closed-Loop Systems

    Can compensate for disturbance

    Input signal is subtracted by the Output signal to produce the

    actuating/error signal

    Less sensitive to noise

    Requires output transducers

    More complex and expensive than open-loop systems

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    12/27

    Computer-Controlled Systems Controller or compensator is a digital computer Multiple loops can be controlled or compensated through time

    sharing

    Adjustments (ex. calibration or changes in the design) can bemade in the software.

    Additional intelligent functions such as scheduling can be addedto the system through programming.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    13/27

    Analysis and Design Objectives

    Analysis: determines the systems performance.

    In the elevator example, we found out responses from the input.

    Comparing these responses to a specification is a form of analysis.

    Design: systems performance is created or changed We can design a system based on a desired specification.

    Redesigning maybe required if the responses does not meet the

    specifications.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    14/27

    Analysis and Design Objective: Transient

    Response Slow transient response in the elevator example makes

    passenger impatient.

    Very rapid response makes them uncomfortable

    Oscillating response for a certain duration results todisconcerting feeling.

    Not meeting a transient response specification may result

    to physical damage.

    Parameters and components can be adjusted or

    redesigned to yield desired transient response.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    15/27

    Analysis and Design Objective: Steady-

    State Response Response after the transients have decayed to zero

    The concern is on the accuracy of the steady-state

    response.

    Imagine in the elevator example, the input is 4

    th

    floor andthe elevator stops near 4thfloor (in between 3rdand 4th

    floor)

    Steady-state error can be reduced by designing acorrective action.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    16/27

    Analysis and Design Objective: Stability

    Analysis and design of transient and steady-state

    responses are useless if the system is not stable.

    The total response of a system is the sum of the natural

    and forced responses.

    A system is stable if:

    The natural response approach to zero. Leaving only forced

    response.

    Or Oscillate.

    If the natural response grows without bounds, the

    systems is unstable.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    17/27

    Analysis and Design Objective: Others

    Factors affecting hardware selectionhardware specs

    must be considered in the design.

    Financial considerationbudget may affect the design.

    Robustnesssystem is not sensitive to parameter

    changes.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    18/27

    Design Process

    Develop a

    Mathematical

    Model

    From the

    schematic

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    19/27

    (Case Study) Antenna Azimuth: An

    Introduction to Position Control SystemsPosition Control

    Converts a position input command to a position output

    response.

    Used in antennas, robot arms, and computer disk drives.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    20/27

    (Case Study) Antenna Azimuth: An

    Introduction to Position Control SystemsStep 1. Transform the requirements to physical system.

    What is to be designed?

    What are the design specifications?

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    21/27

    (Case Study) Antenna Azimuth: An

    Introduction to Position Control SystemsStep 2. Draw a functional block diagram.

    Translate the qualitative description to functional block

    diagram

    Identify components and their interconnections.

    Includes possible

    hardware descriptions.

    a detailed layout if

    possible.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    22/27

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    23/27

    (Case Study) Antenna Azimuth: An

    Introduction to Position Control SystemsStep 4. Develop a mathematical model.

    Use physical laws on the schematic. Electrical systems:

    KirchoffsVoltage Law

    KirchoffsCurrent Law

    Mechanical System:

    Newtons Law

    These laws leads to mathematical models that describesthe input and output relationship of dynamic systems.

    ex. A linear, time-invariant differential equation.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    24/27

    (Case Study) Antenna Azimuth: An

    Introduction to Position Control SystemsStep 5. Reduce the block diagram. A large system may have multiple interconnected subsystems each described

    by a mathematical model.

    In order to simplify the analysis and design, the system should be reduced to

    a single block that represents the system from its input and output.

    A system with multiple

    subsystems

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    25/27

    (Case Study) Antenna Azimuth: An

    Introduction to Position Control SystemsStep 6.Analysis and Design.

    Skip the step 5 if the interest in the performance of each

    subsystem.

    System response and performance are analyzed and

    compared to the response specifications and performance

    requirements.

    If the above fails, the designer redesigns or add

    hardware/software to achieve desired performance.

    Test input signals are used.

    Standard inputs signals: impulses, steps, ramps,

    parabolas, and sinusoids.

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    26/27

  • 8/10/2019 1. Control Systems

    27/27