Upload
lizbeth-elliott
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Chapter 10
Correlation and Regression
2
Consider two variables of a population denoted x and y (e.g. weight and height)
Goal:
Determine if there is a relation between x and y (correlation).
If there is a relation, find a method of predicting values (regression).
Objective
3
Examples
1. x : Height of the mothery : Height of the daughter
2. x : Number of cigarettes per dayy : Lifespan
3. x : Daily calorie intakey : Weight
3. x : Shoe sizey : Number of friends on Facebook
4
ExampleThis table includes a random sample of heights of mothers, fathers, and their daughters.
QuestionAre the heights of daughters independent of the height of their mothers?
Or is there a correlation between the heights of mothers and those of daughters?
If yes, how strong is it?
5
ExampleThis table includes a random sample of heights of mothers, fathers, and their daughters.
The heights of mothers and their daughters in this sample seem to be strongly correlated…
But heights of fathers and their daughters in this sample seem to be weakly correlated (if at all).
(we will soon see how we came to this conclusion)
6
7
Objective
Investigate how two variables (x and y) are related (i.e. correlated). That is, how much they depend on each other.
Section 10.2Correlation between two
variables (x and y)
8
Definitions
A correlation exists between two variables when the values of one appears to somehow affect the values of the other in some way.
In this class, we are only interested in linear correlation
9
Linear correlation coefficient : rA numerical measure of the strength of the linear relationship between two variables, x and y, representing quantitative data.
r always belongs in the interval (-1,1)
( i.e. –1 r 1 )
We use this value to conclude if there is (or is not) a linear correlation between the two variables.
Definitions
10
Exploring the Data
We can often see a relationship between two variables by constructing a scatterplot.
11
Positive Correlation
We say the data has positive correlation if the data follows a line (with a positive slope).
The correlation coefficient (r) will be close to +1
12
Negative Correlation
We say the data has negative correlation if the data follows a line (with a negative slope).
The correlation coefficient (r) will be close to –1
13
We say the data has no correlation if the data does not seem to follow any line.
The correlation coefficient (r) will be close to 0
No Correlation
14
r ≈ 1 Strong positive linear correlation
r ≈ 0 Weak linear correlation
r ≈ -1 Strong negative linear correlation
Interpreting r
15
Nonlinear Correlation
The data may follow a curve, but if the data is not linear, the linear correlation coefficient (r) will be close to zero.
16
1. The sample of paired (x, y) data is a random sample of quantitative data.
2. Visual examination of the scatterplot must confirm that the points approximate a straight-line pattern.
3. The outliers must be removed if they are known to be errors. (Note: We will not do this in this course)
Requirements
17
n Number of pairs of sample data
Denotes the addition of the items
x The sum of all x-valuesx = x1 + x2 +…+ xn
y The sum of all y-valuesy = y1 + y2 +…+ yn
Notation
18
x2 The sum of the squares for all x-valuesx2 = x1
2 + x22 +…+ xn
2
(x)2 The sum of the x-values, then squared(x)2 = (x1 + x2 +…+ xn)2
xy The sum of the products of x and yxy = x1y1 + x1y2 +…+ xnyn
Notation
19
r Sample linear correlation coefficient
Population linear correlation coefficient(i.e. the linear correlation between the two populations)
Correlation Coefficient
n(xy) – (x)(y)
n(x2) – (x)2 n(y2) – (y)2r =
r measures the strength of a linear relationship between the paired values in a sample.
We use StatCrunch compute r (Don’t panic!)
20
Make a scatterplot for the heights of mother , daughter
Enter data on StatCrunch (Mother in 1st column, daughter in 2nd column)1
Example 1a
21Graphics – Scatter Plot
Make a scatterplot for the heights of mother , daughter
2
Example 1a
22
Select var1 for X variable (height of mother)Select var2 for Y variable (height of daughter)Click Create Graph!
Make a scatterplot for the heights of mother , daughter
3
Example 1a
23Voila! (Does there appear to be correlation?)
Make a scatterplot for the heights of mother , daughter
4
Example 1a
24
Find the linear correlation coefficient of the heights
Example 1b
Stat – Summary Stats – Correlation1
25
Select var1 and var2 so they appear in the right boxClick Calculate2
Find the linear correlation coefficient of the heights
Example 1b
26
Find the linear correlation coefficient of the heights
Example 1b
3 The Correlation Coefficient is r = 0.802 (rounded)
27
Determining if Correlation Exists
We determine whether a population is correlated via a two-tailed test on a sample using a significance level (α)
H0 : ρ = 0 (i.e. not correlated)
H1 : ρ ≠ 0 (i.e. is correlated)
Again, two methods available:
Critical Regions (Use Table A-6)
P-value (Use StatCrunch) Note: In most cases we use significance level = 0.05
28
Use Table A-6 to find the critical values, which depends on the sample size n. Use both positive a negative values (two-tailed)
● If the r is in the critical region, we conclude that there is a linear correlation.
(Since H0 is rejected)
● If the r is not in the critical region, we say there is insufficient evidence of correlation.
(Since we fail to reject H0)
Using Critical Regions
-1 10
29
30
Use a 0.05 significance level to determine if the heights are linearly correlated.
Example 1c
Using Critical Regions
● From Example 1b, we found r = 0.802
● Since n = 20 and α = 0.05, using Table A-6, we find the critical values to be: 0.444, -0.444
Since r is in the critical region (reject H0), we conclude the data is linearly correlated (under 0.05 significance).
31
Use StatCrunch to calculate the two-tailed P-value from a sample set (see Example 1c)
● If the P-value is less than α, we conclude that there is a linear correlation.
(Since H0 is rejected)
● If the P-value is greater than α, we say there is insufficient evidence of correlation.
(Since we fail to reject H0)
Using P-value
32
Use a 0.05 significance level to determine if the heights are linearly correlated.
Example 1c
Using P-value
● On StatCrunch:
Stat – Summary Stats – Correlation
● Select var1, var2 so they appear in right box Click Next
● Check “Display two-sides P-value from sig. test” Click Calculate
● Result: P-value < 0.0001
Since P-value is less than α=0.05 (reject H0), we conclude the data is linearly correlated
33
Caution!Know that the methods of this section apply only to a linear correlation.
If you conclude that there is no linear correlation, it is possible that there is some other association that is not linear.
34
Round r to three decimal places so that it can be compared to critical values in Table A-6
Rounding the Linear Correlation Coefficient
35
Properties of the Linear Correlation Coefficient r
1. –1 r 1
2. If all values of either variable are converted to a different scale, the value of r does not change.
3. The value of r is not affected by the choice of x and y. Interchange all x-values and y-values and the value of r will not change.
4. r measures strength of a linear relationship.
5. r is very sensitive to outliers, they can dramatically affect its value.
36
A new medication for high blood pressure was tested on a batch of 18 patients with different ages. The results were as follows:
(a) Plot the points
(b) Find the correlation coefficient
(c) Use a 0.05 significance level to test linear correlation
Example 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Age 56 34 76 12 56 33 67 69 22 11 65 43 23 66 19 84 27 39
Blood Pressure 194 133 250 71 201 133 227 230 124 68 219 157 123 222 182 298 113 146
37
● Enter data in StatCrunch
● Go to: Graphics – Scatter Plot
● Select var1 and var2, hit Create Graph!
Example 2a Plot the points1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Age 56 34 76 12 56 33 67 69 22 11 65 43 23 66 19 84 27 39
Blood Pressure 194 133 250 71 201 133 227 230 124 68 219 157 123 222 182 298 113 146
38
● Go to: Stats – Summary Stats – Correlation
● Select var1 and var2, hit Calculate
Example 2b
r = 0.964
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Age 56 34 76 12 56 33 67 69 22 11 65 43 23 66 19 84 27 39
Blood Pressure 194 133 250 71 201 133 227 230 124 68 219 157 123 222 182 298 113 146
Find Correlation Coefficient
39
Using Critical Values
Given n=18 and α=0.05, using Table A-6, the critical values are 0.468, -0.468
r = 0.964
Example 2c Test for Correlation (α = 0.05)
Since r is in the critical region, (reject H0), we conclude there is linear correlation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Age 56 34 76 12 56 33 67 69 22 11 65 43 23 66 19 84 27 39
Blood Pressure 194 133 250 71 201 133 227 230 124 68 219 157 123 222 182 298 113 146
40
Using P-value
● Go to: Stats – Summary Stats – Correlation
● Select var1 and var2, hit Next
● Check box, hit Calculate
Example 2c Test for Correlation (α = 0.05)
P-value < 0.0001
Since P-value less than α=0.05 (reject H0), we conclude there is linear correlation
r = 0.964
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Age 56 34 76 12 56 33 67 69 22 11 65 43 23 66 19 84 27 39
Blood Pressure 194 133 250 71 201 133 227 230 124 68 219 157 123 222 182 298 113 146
41
A survey of 15 people was conducted to see how many friends people had on Facebook vs. their shoe size. The results were as follows:
(a) Plot the points
(b) Find the correlation coefficient
(c) Use a 0.05 significance level to test linear correlation
Example 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Friends on FB 170 170 680 510 680 425 425 680 85 680 850 850 680 17 510Shoe size 8.4 9.0 9.1 7.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1 8.2 9.3 8.0 9.4
42
● Enter data in StatCrunch
● Go to: Graphics – Scatter Plot
● Select var1 and var2, hit Create Graph!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Friends on FB 170 170 680 510 680 425 425 680 85 680 850 850 680 17 510Shoe size 8.4 9.0 9.1 7.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1 8.2 9.3 8.0 9.4
Example 3a Plot the points
43
● Go to: Stats – Summary Stats – Correlation
● Select var1 and var2, hit Calculate
Example 3b1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Friends on FB 170 170 680 510 680 425 425 680 85 680 850 850 680 17 510Shoe size 8.4 9.0 9.1 7.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1 8.2 9.3 8.0 9.4
Find Correlation Coefficient
r = 0.409
44
Using Critical Values
Given n=15 and α=0.05, using Table A-6, the critical values are 0.514, -0.514
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Friends on FB 170 170 680 510 680 425 425 680 85 680 850 850 680 17 510Shoe size 8.4 9.0 9.1 7.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1 8.2 9.3 8.0 9.4
r = 0.409
Example 3c Test for Correlation (α = 0.05)
Since r is not in the critical region, (fail to reject H0), we conclude there is no correlation
45
Using P-value
● Go to: Stats – Summary Stats – Correlation
● Select var1 and var2, hit Next
● Check box, hit Calculate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Friends on FB 170 170 680 510 680 425 425 680 85 680 850 850 680 17 510Shoe size 8.4 9.0 9.1 7.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.1 8.2 9.3 8.0 9.4
Example 3c Test for Correlation (α = 0.05)
P-value = 0.1297
Since P-value greater than α=0.05 (fail to reject H0), we conclude there is no correlation
r = 0.409
46
Interpreting r:Explained Variation
The value of r2 is the proportion of the variation in y that is explained by the linear relationship between x and y.
r = 0.623r 2 = 0.388
r = 0.998r 2 = 0.996
Low variance High variance
47
Using the data in Example 2 (blood pressure vs. age), we found that the linear correlation coefficient is r = 0.964
What proportion of the variation in the patients’ blood pressure can be explained by the variation in the patients’ age?
With r = 0.964, we get r2 = 0.929
We conclude that 0.929 (or about 93%) of the variation in blood pressure can be explained by the linear relationship between the age and blood pressure.
This implies about 7% of the variation in blood pressure cannot be explained by the age.
Example 4
48
Common Errors Involving Correlation
1. Causation: It is wrong to conclude that correlation implies causality.
2. Linearity: There may be some relationship between x and y even when there is no linear correlation.
49
Caution!!!Know that correlation does not
imply causality.
There may be correlation without causality.
50
51
Objective
Given two linearly correlated variables (x and y), find the linear function (equation) that best describes the trend.
Section 10.3Regression
52
Equation of a line
Recall that the equation of a line is given by its slope and y-intercept
y = m x + b
53
Regression
For a set of data (with variables x and y) that is linearly correlated, we want to find the equation of the line that best describes the trend.
This process is called Regression
54
x : The predictor variable (Also called the explanatory variable or independent variable)
y : The response variable (Also called the dependent variable)
Regression Equation The equation that describes the algebraically relationship between the two variables
Regression Line The graph of the regression equation (also called the line of best fit or least squares line)
Definitions
55
Regression Equation
y = b0 + b1x
b0 : y-intercept b1 : slope
Regression Line
Definitions
56
Notation for Regression Equation
y-intercept
Slope
Equation
Population
0
1
y = 0 + 1 x
Sample
b0
b1
y = b0 + b1 x
57
1. The sample of paired (x, y) data is a random sample of quantitative data.
2. Visual examination of the scatterplot shows that the points approximate a straight-line pattern.
3. Any outliers must be removed if they are known to be errors. Consider the effects of any outliers that are not known errors.
Requirements
58
Rounding b0 and b1
Round to three significant digits
If you use the formulas from the book, do not round intermediate values.
59
Refer to the sample data given in Table 10-1 in the Chapter Problem.
Find the equation of the regression line in which the explanatory variable (x-variable) is the cost of a slice of pizza and the response variable (y-variable) is the corresponding cost of a subway fare.
(CPI=Consumer Price Index, not used)
Example 1
60
x : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.25 1.75 2.00
y : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.35 1.50 2.00
1. Enter data in StatCrunch (columns)
Example 1
61
x : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.25 1.75 2.00
y : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.35 1.50 2.00
2. Stat – Regression – Simple Linear
Example 1
62
x : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.25 1.75 2.00
y : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.35 1.50 2.00
2. Select var1 and var2 (i.e. x and y values) Click Calculate
Example 1
63
x : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.25 1.75 2.00
y : 0.15 0.35 1.00 1.35 1.50 2.00
b0 = 0.0345
b1 = 0.945
Regression Equation
y = (0.0345) + (0.945)x
Example 1
64
Regression Equation
y = (0.0345) + (0.945)x
Example 1
65
1. Predicted value of y is y = b0 + b1x
2. Use the regression equation for predictions only if the graph of the regression line on the scatterplot confirms that the regression line fits the points reasonably well.
Using the Regression Equation for Predictions
3. Use the regression equation for predictions only if the linear correlation coefficient r indicates that there is a linear correlation between the two variables.
66
4. Use the regression line for predictions only if the value of x does not go much beyond the scope of the available sample data.
Predicting too far beyond the scope of the available sample data is called extrapolation, and it could result in bad predictions.
Using the Regression Equation for Predictions
5. If the regression equation does not appear to be useful for making predictions, the best predicted value of a variable is its point estimate, which is its sample mean ( y )
_
67
Using the Regression Equation for Predictions
Source: www.xkcd.com
68
Strategy for Predicting Values of Y
69
If the regression equation is not a good model, the best predicted value of y is simply y (the mean of the y values)
Remember, this strategy applies to linear patterns of points in a scatterplot.
Using the Regression Equation for Predictions
_
70
For a pair of sample x and y values, the residual is the difference between the observed sample value of y and the y-value that is predicted by using the regression equation. That is,
Definition
Residual = (observed y) – (predicted y) = y – y
71
Residuals
72
A straight line satisfies the least-squares property if the sum of the squares of the residuals is the smallest sum possible.
The best possible regression line satisfies this properties (hence why it is also called the least squares line)
Definition
73
Least Squares Property
sum = (-5)2 + 112 + (-13) 2 + 72 = 364(any other line would yield a sum larger than 364)