1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES EFAC Review Conventional Facilities Update Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities May 10, 2007

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

EFAC Review

Conventional Facilities Update Marty Fallier

Director for Conventional FacilitiesMay 10, 2007


Outline

• Conventional Facilities Deliverables for XFD• Overview of Conventional Facilities Scope

• Experimental Floor• Beamline Support Space – LOB’s• Utility Services for XFD

• Stability Strategy• Schedule Dependency


CF Deliverables for XFD

• Provide a facility that promotes collaborative leading edge research in a pleasant working environment• Structurally stable facility with low vibration (<25nm Rms)• Tunnel design that provides required shielding and accessibility• Experimental floor temperature stability of +/- 0.5 deg C• Utility capacity & shielding for up to 3.6 GeV operation• Utility services for anticipated full suite of beamlines (60m)• Facility layout that enables future long beamlines• Facility design enabling future expansion to support full

beamline build-out


NSLS II Facility Overview

Access Tunnel

LOB (1 of 5)JPSINSLS

CFN

BLOC

NSLS II

Service Bldgs (1 of 5)


NSLS II Facility Overview cont’dNSLS II Floor Plan

1.BLOC – Booster/LINAC/ Operations Center

2.LOB – Lab Office Buildings (3 base scope up to 5 future)

3.Service Buildings (5)

4.RF Area

5.Tunnel Area

6.Electrical Mezzanine

7.Experimental Floor

8.Access Corridor

1

4

3

2

2

2

2

23

3

3

3


NSLS II Facility Overview cont’d

Access Corridor

Lab-Office Bldg

SR Tunnel

Experimental Floor

Service Bldg 1st Floor

(earlier concept)

7

5

8

6Electrical Mezzanine

(above tunnel)


Facility Program

Base Scope Full Build-Out Base Scope Full Build-OutGSF GSF GSF GSF

Ring Building 242,000 242,000 242,000 242,000 No ChangeService Buildings 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 No ChangeLINAC/RF Area 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 No Change

55,000 55,000 Deleted Deleted Staff not directly required for NSLS II operation moved to other bldgs

NA NA 24,000 24,000 Only supports staff directly required for operation (9ksf) & includes compact booster (15ksf)

11,000 44,000 63,000 105,000

Changed to 3 @21,000 gsf ea. from 1 @11,000 gsf in CDR. CDR also had 11,000 gsf equivalent LOB space in CLOB

Conference Center NA 15,000 NA NA Deleted

Total GSF 361,000 409,000 382,000 424,000

Lab Office Buildings

Building /Area/Function

Central Lab/Office Bldg (CLOB) [Replaced by smaller Operations Center]

Booster, LINAC & Operations Center (BLOC) Building [Replaces CLOB]

Comments

CDR Program Current Program


Revised LOB Program

• The 2 LOB’s (1 integrated in CLOB, the other standalone) in CDR were insufficient to support full beamline buildout• Intended to support initial suite of beamlines (~5 - 10)• Would require substantial additional construction to support future beamlines (at

least 3 more LOB’s plus some additions)• Current plan is to provide 3 larger LOB’s to support more rapid buildout

of beamlines and transfer of NSLS beamlines (~20)

Each LOB Total Each LOB TotalNo. LOB's 2 3Offices 30 60 72 216Labs 5 10 6 18GSF 11,000 22000 21000 63000Direct Cost $3.3 M $6.6M* $6.3 M $18.9 MTPC Cost $5.0 M $10.0M* $10.5 M $31.6 M

* Cost of 1 LOB included in CLOB

LOB ProgramCDR Program Current Program


Ring Building Section

Ratchet or Shield Wall

Electrical Mezzanine

Bldg structure Isolated from tunnel and experimental Floor

Earth Shield Berm

Experimental Floor

Access Corridor

Tunnel Floor

“Monolithic Joint”

Isolation Joint

Isolation Joint or Void Space

Tunnel Roof

Isolated Pier for Column

Isolated Grade Beam


LOB Features

• Modular design – can be added when needed without interrupting operation• 3 @ 21,000 SF each – Each serves six sectors• 72 offices w/ conference space, interaction areas, lavs, showers• 6 labs - intended for shared use• Shipping/Receiving/Storage area & chemical storage area• Potential for expansion for 2 more LOB’s

• Egress provided for personnel and large items at each LOB• Loading area with exterior roll-up door• Double-door from each lab onto the experimental floor

• Designed to minimize impacts to future long beamlines


Beamline Utility Support

• Services provided at each BL include:• Electric Power Panel at Ratchet Wall, 75-95kW/Cell,

120/208V• Cooling Water, HVAC Supply Air, Exhaust• Compressed Air, LN2, GN2

• DI Water (Copper and Aluminum) by Accelerator Group


Stability Dependent on Conventional Facilities

• Stability goals driven by conventional facility design• Stability of storage ring tunnel floor

• Vibration < 25 nm rms from PSD from 4-50hz (vertical)• Stability of experimental floor

• Vibration level of ~ 25 nm rms (vertical) from PSD from 4-50hz for general floor area

• Vibration level for 1 nm resolution beam lines requires further definition but appears achievable with proper correlation

• Thermal stability of storage ring tunnel environment• +/- 0.1o C for 1 hour time constant

• Thermal stability of experimental floor• +/- 0.5o C for 1 hour time constant


CF Program for Vibration Management

• Assessment of “green-field” conditions• Studies by Colin-Gordon Associates & N. Simos• On-going monitoring program

• Identification and mitigation of cultural sources (where feasible)

• FE Modeling of site and facility design• Needed to understand & predict facility response • Design optimization tool

• Analysis of other facilities (CFN, APS & SPring 8 thus far)• Draw upon lessons learned• Provide input for model • Model performance verification

• During & after construction, implement monitoring and maintenance program


Ring Building Section

Non-vibrating Equipment

Non-vibrating

Equipment

Need to assure that vibration mitigation measures are carried out at Ring building interfaces with other structures and where systems enter building or tunnel

Section at Lab Office Building and Service Building

Rotating Machinery

Rotating Machinery

Distance determined by modeling & empirical analysis


Schedule Dependency

• Conventional Facilities are the critical path until facilities are turned over to Accelerator and Experimental Divisions• Critical Interfaces• CF needs Beamline scope and design criteria during T-I and T-II design to

assure conventional facilitis will meet XFD requirements – (especially for 1 nm & 0.1 meV resolution and long beam lines)• XFD requires Beneficial Occupancy of experimental floor as soon as

possible to meet beamline installation schedule• Interface managers to be designated shortly

• CFD, XFD and ASD meet weekly as part of schedule task force to assure schedule needs are coordinated• Currently assessing revised funding profile impacts

Documents

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES EFAC Review Conventional Facilities Update Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities May 10, 2007