1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Conventional Facilities Steve Dierker Director, NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Division NSLS-II User Workshop July 17,

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Conventional Facilities

Steve DierkerDirector, NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Division

NSLS-II User WorkshopJuly 17, 2007


Outline

• Conventional Facilities Scope– Site Plan– Building Program– Sustainable Design

• BNL Support• CF Schedule & Risk Analysis• Conventional Facilities Deliverables for Users

– Beamline Support Space – LOB’s– Experimental Floor– Utility Services for Beamlines– Stability Goals

• CF Path Forward


NSLS-II Siteplan

Access Tunnel

LOB (1 of 3)JPSI

NSLS

CFN

BLOC

NSLS-II

Service Bldgs (1 of 5)

CHW Plant

Bldg 603 Substation

Future LOB’s


View of NSLS-II

JPSI

Entry LobbyLOB

LINAC/Booster


NSLS-II Main Entry Lobby

JPSI

Entry LobbyLOB

LINAC/Booster


NSLS-II Floor PlanNSLS-II Floor Plan

1.BLOC – Booster/LINAC/ Operations Center

2.LOB – Lab Office Buildings (3 base scope up to 5 future)

3.Service Buildings (5)

4.RF Area

5.Tunnel Area

6.Electrical Mezzanine

7.Experimental Floor

8.Access Corridor

14

3

2

2

2 2

2

3

3

3

3


Facility Program

Base Scope Full Build-OutGSF GSF

Ring Building 242,000 242,000 Service Buildings 40,000 40,000 RF Area 10,000 10,000

Operations Center 12,000 12,000

Booster Ring 15,000 15,000

Linac 7,000 7,000

64,000 110,000

Total GSF 390,000 436,000

Building /Area/Function

Lab Office Buildings

Base plan provides 3 large LOB’s to support rapid build-out of beamlines with plan for 2 more LOB’s to be added in future


Sustainable Design

• DOE will require Certification to USGBC LEED “Gold” std.• Reviewing DOE guidance on how it will be applied to NSLS-II

process systems• Additional investment in these areas should achieve Gold

• Additional storm & potable water credits• Additional reuse/sustainable material credits• Systems for added energy efficiency

• Photovoltaics & renewable energy credits• Heat recovery

39 15 15 Project Totals (pre-certification estimates)

Certified 26-32 points Silver 33-38 points Gold 39-51 points Platinum 52-69 points

Y M N


BNL Support

•BNL Support to the project is important and demonstrable• Warehouse Demolition & Replacement

– Must remove Bldgs 86, 100, 210, 211, and 481 before FY 09– Warehouse facility replacement is underway as GPP project– Demolition planned for Spring FY08

• Chilled Water Plant Expansion– NSLS-II and Lab will share expansion cost as both need added capacity– A/E selected and ready to begin design– Design to run concurrent with NSLS-II T-I and T-II– Construction start in FY09 and complete early FY11


Existing Site Building 603

CCWF

Bldg 100

Bldg 209

Bldg 86

Bldg 210

Bldg 481

Bldg 211


CF Schedule

Title I Design

CD-2

Title II Design

CD-3

Site Prep. Const.

Ring Bldg Bid & Award

1st Pentant RFE (Pentant 1)

2nd Pentant RFE (Pentant 5)

3rd Pentant RFE (Pentant 2)

4th Pentant RFE (Pentant 3)

5th Pentant RFE (Pentant 4)

Booster/LINAC/Ops Ctr (BLOC)

Lab/Office Bldg’s (LOB’s)

CHW Plant Expansion

Mech & Elect Utilities

Integrated Ctrl & Comm.

Standard Equipment

Commissioning

Activity FY07 FY08 FY09 FY010 FY11 FY12 FY13

Begin Accelerator Installation

Full Ring Bldg Available for Accelerator & Beamline Installation

Control Room RFE

LOB’s Complete

BO for all CF Construction


Risk Assessment

• Technical Risk• Primarily building stability, vibration & temperature control

• Schedule Risks• Title I & II Engineering are on the critical path• Construction of Ring Building is critical path

• Cost Risks• Technical and schedule risks can impact costs• Construction and material markets are still volatile

• Risk registry has been prepared • Risk assessment database integrated with cost estimate database

• Current Contingency allocated for Conventional Facilities ~ 40%


CF Deliverables for Users

• Provide a facility that promotes collaborative leading edge research in a pleasant working environment

• Structurally stable facility with low vibration (<25 nm rms)• Experimental floor temperature stability of +/- 1.0 deg F• Utility capacity & shielding for 3 GeV operation• Facility layout that enables future long beamlines• Facility design enabling future expansion to support full beamline

build-out• A reasonably quiet Experimental Floor - noise level <NC 60• Convenient parking and access to Labs/Offices/Beamlines


LOB Features

• Modular design – can be added when needed without interrupting operation

• 3 @ 22,800 SF each – Each serves six sectors• 72 offices w/ conference space, interaction areas, lavs, showers• 6 labs - intended for shared use• Shipping/Receiving/Storage area & chemical storage area• Potential for expansion for 2 more LOB’s

• Egress provided for personnel and large items at each LOB• Loading area with exterior roll-up door• Double-door from each lab onto the experimental floor• Rolling access to all beamline areas


LOB Layout

22,800 SF


LOB Elevation


Ring Building Section

Ratchet or Shield Wall

Electrical Mezzanine

Bldg structure Isolated from tunnel and experimental Floor

Earth Shield Berm

Experimental Floor

Access Corridor

Tunnel Floor

“Monolithic Joint”

Isolation Joint

Isolation Joint or Void Space

Tunnel Roof

Isolated Pier for Column

Isolated Grade BeamBeamline Utility Services


Beamline Utility Support

• Services provided at each BL include:• Electric Power Panel at Ratchet Wall, 75-95 kW/Cell, 120/208V• Cooling Water, HVAC Supply Air, Exhaust• Compressed Air, LN2, GN2

• DI Water (Copper and Aluminum)


Stability Dependent on Conventional Facilities

• Stability goals driven by conventional facility design• Stability of storage ring tunnel floor

• Vibration < 25 nm rms from PSD from 4-50 hz (vertical)• Stability of experimental floor

• Vibration level of ~ 25 nm rms (vertical) from PSD from 4-50 hz for general floor area• Vibration level for 1 nm resolution beam lines requires further definition but appears

achievable with proper correlation• Thermal stability of storage ring tunnel environment

• +/- 0.1o C• Thermal stability of experimental floor

• +/- 0.5o C


CF Path Forward

• Design well underway for November CD-2 reviews• Additional focused technical studies underway for:

• Vibrational stability of tunnel & experimental floor• Stability needed for 1 nm resolution beamlines• Optimization of thermal stability• Methods to achieve sustainability goals • CF design and cost if extra-long straits are installed

• Value engineering review & technical review planned for September

Documents

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Conventional Facilities Steve Dierker Director, NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Division NSLS-II User Workshop July 17,