Upload
jesse-mckenzie
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
ASSET ALLOCATION
M A X I M I Z E E X P E C T E D U T I L I T Y
HwwwUE '2
1')(
i s t h e v e c t o r o f e x p e c t e d r e t u r n sw i s t h e v e c t o r o f p o r t f o l i o w e i g h t sH i s t h e v a r i a n c e c o v a r i a n c e m a t r i x i s t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f r i s k a v e r s i o n
2
With Riskless Asset
HwwrwwMax
wwts'
2' 00
1'.. 0
)1
01 rHwra
3
Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark
000 '
2)'( wwHwwwwMax
10
1 Hww
4
Hedging First Asset
•
• If lambda is large or mu is small, then this is least squares
HwwwMax
wts'
2'
1.. 1
1,0,...,0 is 'e where,'1
1'
11
11
11
1
11
1
He
eHe
eHHw
5
With No Riskless Asset
TH E O PTIM AL ALLO CATIO NEQ UATIO N:
w VV
VV
1
11
1
1
11
'
'
where is a vector of ones.
6
Allocation subject to VaR
HwwrwwMax
Hwwts'
2'1' 0
'.. 2
212
01
0
1
~'~1
~ where,~'~2
1
and binding,not is constraint if ,~1
H
rHrU
Hw
7
But if constraint is binding:
• The constraint reduces expected utility
• Higher generalized Sharpe ratios still lead to improved utility
~'~2/
,~~'~
120
11
HrEU
HH
w
8
STATIC ALLOCATIONS
ASSET ALLOCATION ACROSSSTOCKS AND BONDS:
DATA FROM 1982-1996(July)DAILY S&P500 AND TREASURYBOND FUTURES
STOCK VOLATILITY = 15.4 %MEAN RETURN = 11.63%
BOND VOLATILITY = 11.4%MEAN RETURN = 7.27 %
CORRELATION = .407
9
Static Allocations
TABLE 1
PORTFOLIO SHARES
Risk ( ) 2 4 6 8 16 % Equity 123 74 58 50 38 26
10
Derivatives of Optimal Allocation
TABLE 2EQUITY WEIGHTS (%)
Risk () 2 4 6 8 16 dw
drr 2.5 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.0
dw
d-2.1 -1.4 -1.2 -1.1 -0.8 -0.69
dw
d0.47 0.16 0.05 .002 -0.08 -0.15
11
Derivatives of Portfolio Risk
TABLE 3PORTFOLIO RISK
Risk() 2 4 6 8 16 1.29 .66 .55 .51 .47 .45dv
drr 4.38 1.100.490.270.07 0.0
dv
d-1.00-.08 0.090.150.210.23
dv
d0.64 0.240.170.140.120.11
12
Dynamic Asset Allocation
• Maximize the Expected Utility of Terminal Wealth
• Ignore hedging demands and simply chose portfolios to be myoptically optimal
• For all t choose portfolio weights so that
ttttt
wwHwwMax
t11 '
2'
13
Measure of Success
• If one dollar is invested, what should expected utility be?
• A good model for mean and variance should achieve a higher level of realized utility
2
11
1
ˆ2
ˆˆ
2
1
rU
rVrEEU
rA
T
tt
T
tt
T
ttT
14
Active Portfolio Strategies
• Typically involve efforts to estimate expected returns
• Covariance matrix is taken as constant • Constraints imposed on short positions or
ranges of asset shares• Tilts toward some factor may be done as an
overlay• Rebalancing is periodic
15
Volatility Based Asset Allocation
• Keep expected returns constant to isolate the effects of volatility
• Volatilities can be estimated at high frequencies so this gives potential for fast acting asset allocation
• Risk management can be implemented in this way so that the trade-off between risk and return is explicitly considered
16
Results for Stock Bond Problem
• Use Multivariate GARCH model of component form
• Rebalance every day in response to new volatility and correlation information
• Keep expected returns equal to their realized values to isolate volatility effects
17
50
100
150
200250
0.5
1.0
1.52.0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
SVOL SBCOR1 WMU6
18
RETURNS FROM DAILY ACTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION
RETURN RMU4 RMU6 RMU8 RMV R6040 RFIXMVMean 0.0537 0.0481 0.0454 0.0370 0.0400 0.0342Max 5.05 4.66 4.46 3.93 6.66 4.92Min -8.08 -5.85 -4.73 -3.78 -14.23 -6.85
Std.Dev 0.872 0.753 0.706 0.643 0.745 0.672Skew -0.24 -0.11 -0.05 0.04 -1.86 -0.20
Kurtosis 6.8 6.4 6.3 6.1 43.5 8.6UBAR6 1.03 1.04 1.01 .82 .69 .78
Where UBAR6= average realized utility for risk aversion 6, U=200
62rt rt when portfolio
returns, r, are in daily percentages.
19
Strategic Rebalancing
• To reduce transaction costs and trading, only rebalance when the expected gain exceeds a threshold
• Rebalance on day t if Expected Utility at t+1 with optimal weights exceeds Expected Utility with existing weights by more than a fixed number
20
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
WMU8 W0MU8