20
1 ASSET ALLOCATION M A X I M I Z E E X P E C T E D U T IL IT Y Hw w w U E ' 2 1 ' ) ( is th e v e c to r o f e x p e c te d retu rn s w is th e v e c to r o f p o r tfo lio w e ig h ts H is th e v a r ia n c e c o v a r ia n c e m a t r ix is th e c o e ffic ie n t o f r is k a v e r s io n

1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

1

ASSET ALLOCATION

M A X I M I Z E E X P E C T E D U T I L I T Y

HwwwUE '2

1')(

i s t h e v e c t o r o f e x p e c t e d r e t u r n sw i s t h e v e c t o r o f p o r t f o l i o w e i g h t sH i s t h e v a r i a n c e c o v a r i a n c e m a t r i x i s t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f r i s k a v e r s i o n

Page 2: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

2

With Riskless Asset

HwwrwwMax

wwts'

2' 00

1'.. 0

)1

01 rHwra

Page 3: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

3

Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

000 '

2)'( wwHwwwwMax

10

1 Hww

Page 4: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

4

Hedging First Asset

• If lambda is large or mu is small, then this is least squares

HwwwMax

wts'

2'

1.. 1

1,0,...,0 is 'e where,'1

1'

11

11

11

1

11

1

He

eHe

eHHw

Page 5: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

5

With No Riskless Asset

TH E O PTIM AL ALLO CATIO NEQ UATIO N:

w VV

VV

1

11

1

1

11

'

'

where is a vector of ones.

Page 6: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

6

Allocation subject to VaR

HwwrwwMax

Hwwts'

2'1' 0

'.. 2

212

01

0

1

~'~1

~ where,~'~2

1

and binding,not is constraint if ,~1

H

rHrU

Hw

Page 7: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

7

But if constraint is binding:

• The constraint reduces expected utility

• Higher generalized Sharpe ratios still lead to improved utility

~'~2/

,~~'~

120

11

HrEU

HH

w

Page 8: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

8

STATIC ALLOCATIONS

ASSET ALLOCATION ACROSSSTOCKS AND BONDS:

DATA FROM 1982-1996(July)DAILY S&P500 AND TREASURYBOND FUTURES

STOCK VOLATILITY = 15.4 %MEAN RETURN = 11.63%

BOND VOLATILITY = 11.4%MEAN RETURN = 7.27 %

CORRELATION = .407

Page 9: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

9

Static Allocations

TABLE 1

PORTFOLIO SHARES

Risk ( ) 2 4 6 8 16 % Equity 123 74 58 50 38 26

Page 10: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

10

Derivatives of Optimal Allocation

TABLE 2EQUITY WEIGHTS (%)

Risk () 2 4 6 8 16 dw

drr 2.5 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.0

dw

d-2.1 -1.4 -1.2 -1.1 -0.8 -0.69

dw

d0.47 0.16 0.05 .002 -0.08 -0.15

Page 11: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

11

Derivatives of Portfolio Risk

TABLE 3PORTFOLIO RISK

Risk() 2 4 6 8 16 1.29 .66 .55 .51 .47 .45dv

drr 4.38 1.100.490.270.07 0.0

dv

d-1.00-.08 0.090.150.210.23

dv

d0.64 0.240.170.140.120.11

Page 12: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

12

Dynamic Asset Allocation

• Maximize the Expected Utility of Terminal Wealth

• Ignore hedging demands and simply chose portfolios to be myoptically optimal

• For all t choose portfolio weights so that

ttttt

wwHwwMax

t11 '

2'

Page 13: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

13

Measure of Success

• If one dollar is invested, what should expected utility be?

• A good model for mean and variance should achieve a higher level of realized utility

2

11

1

ˆ2

ˆˆ

2

1

rU

rVrEEU

rA

T

tt

T

tt

T

ttT

Page 14: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

14

Active Portfolio Strategies

• Typically involve efforts to estimate expected returns

• Covariance matrix is taken as constant • Constraints imposed on short positions or

ranges of asset shares• Tilts toward some factor may be done as an

overlay• Rebalancing is periodic

Page 15: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

15

Volatility Based Asset Allocation

• Keep expected returns constant to isolate the effects of volatility

• Volatilities can be estimated at high frequencies so this gives potential for fast acting asset allocation

• Risk management can be implemented in this way so that the trade-off between risk and return is explicitly considered

Page 16: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

16

Results for Stock Bond Problem

• Use Multivariate GARCH model of component form

• Rebalance every day in response to new volatility and correlation information

• Keep expected returns equal to their realized values to isolate volatility effects

Page 17: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

17

50

100

150

200250

0.5

1.0

1.52.0

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

SVOL SBCOR1 WMU6

Page 18: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

18

RETURNS FROM DAILY ACTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION

RETURN RMU4 RMU6 RMU8 RMV R6040 RFIXMVMean 0.0537 0.0481 0.0454 0.0370 0.0400 0.0342Max 5.05 4.66 4.46 3.93 6.66 4.92Min -8.08 -5.85 -4.73 -3.78 -14.23 -6.85

Std.Dev 0.872 0.753 0.706 0.643 0.745 0.672Skew -0.24 -0.11 -0.05 0.04 -1.86 -0.20

Kurtosis 6.8 6.4 6.3 6.1 43.5 8.6UBAR6 1.03 1.04 1.01 .82 .69 .78

Where UBAR6= average realized utility for risk aversion 6, U=200

62rt rt when portfolio

returns, r, are in daily percentages.

Page 19: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

19

Strategic Rebalancing

• To reduce transaction costs and trading, only rebalance when the expected gain exceeds a threshold

• Rebalance on day t if Expected Utility at t+1 with optimal weights exceeds Expected Utility with existing weights by more than a fixed number

Page 20: 1 ASSET ALLOCATION. 2 With Riskless Asset 3 Mean Variance Relative to a Benchmark

20

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

WMU8 W0MU8