15
1

1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

1

Page 2: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

2

VotingSystems

PerformanceRating

Page 3: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

3

Purpose:

develop

performance rating

standards

openly

useful, objective and substantially comprehensive

for US voting systems.

Page 4: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

4

P.L. Vora, B. Adida, R. Bucholz,D. Chaum, D.L. Dill, D. Jefferson,D.W. Jones, W. Lattin, A.D. Rubin,M.I. Shamos, and M. Yung

COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACMNovember 2004/Vol. 47, No. 11

Page 5: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

5

Modeled after IETF Everything transparent and online Decisions two weeks after meetings Anyone can join “at large”—however, Council Groups elect their own members

Unique Structure:

DESIGNED TO BE ANSI Accredited Standards Developer

Majority of Council Groups must approve standards by (non-secret) majority vote

Page 6: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

6

Technology/SecurityExperts

ElectionOfficial/Experts

VendorsAdvocates& Social Scientists

Council Groups

Page 7: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

7

Stephen Ansolabehere * - MIT David Aragon * - Voter March Ren Bucholz * - Electronic Frontier Foundation Lillie Coney * - Electronic Privacy Information Center Frederick Conrad - University of Michigan Joe Hall * - University of California at Berkeley, SIMS William Kelleher - [email protected] Bob Kibrick * - Verified Voting Eric Lazarus * - Decision Smith Bo Lipari - New Yorkers for Verified Voting James McCarthy * - National Federation of the Blind Dick Niemi - Department of Political Science, University of Rochester Dennis Paull * - Commonwealth Institute Rob Richie * - FairVote - The Center for Voting and Democracy Dan Seligson - Pew Charitable Trusts Suzanne Taylor - Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University Ellen Theisen * - Voters Unite Daniel Tokaji * - Ohio State University Mike Traugott * - Ctr. for Political Studies, Inst. for Social Research, Univ. of Michigan* Founder

Advocates and Social Scientists

Page 8: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

8

Ben Adida * - MIT Andrew Appel * - Princeton University Karl Auerbach* - No Affiliation Josh Benaloh * - Microsoft Research Matt Bishop * - UC Davis Darlene Blake - public policy research organization Jeremy Bryans * - Newcastle Upon Tyne University Duncan Buell - University of South Carolina Ron Crane - truthandhope.org; Open Voting Consortium David Dill * - Verified Voting Michael Fischer - Yale University; TrueVoteCT.org Ari Juels * - RSA Security Stanley Klein * - TrueVoteMD William Lattin * - TTFN Associates Vincent Lipsio * - Lipsio Enterprises Peter Neumann * - SRI International Avi Rubin * - Johns Hopkins University Peter Ryan * - Newcastle Upon Tyne University Ted Selker * - MIT Michael Shamos * - Carnegie Mellon University Jeroen van de Graaf * - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil Poorvi Vora * - George Washington University David Wagner * - UC Berkeley Daniel Wang - San Diego State Unversity Moti Yung * - Columbia University* Founder

Technology and Security Expert

Page 9: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

9

Bill Bryan - Louisiana Department of Justice Cathy Darling - Shasta County Clerk and Registrar of Voters (CA) William Gardner * - New Hampshire Secretary of State David Jefferson * - CA Secretary of State's Technical Oversight Committee Douglas Jones * - University of Iowa Andy Lokken - Ramsey County Elections Ralph Munro * - Former Washington Secretary of State Freddie Oakley * - Clerk Recorder, Yolo County, CA Ion Sancho - supervisor of elections, Leon County florida, no party affiliation Warren Slocum * - Chief Elections Officer, San Mateo County, CA Gene Wittry * - Election Commission Board, Peoria IL * Founder

Election Officials and Experts

Page 10: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

10

Alfie Charles * - Sequoia Voting Systems David Chaum * - Votegrity Kevin Chung * - AVANTE International Technology Guy Duncan * - Election Systems and Software Arthur Keller * - Open Voting Consortium Neil McClure * - Hart InterCivic Sanford Morganstein * - Populex Corporation Andrew Neff * - VoteHere Ian Piper * - Diebold Election Systems, Inc. Howard Van Pelt * - Advanced Voting Systems Richard Vogel * - Vogue Election Systems * Founder

Vendors

Page 11: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

11

Technology/SecurityExperts

ElectionOfficial/Experts Vendors

Advocates& Social Scientists

Page 12: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

12

Technology/SecurityExperts

ElectionOfficial/Experts Vendors

(chair)Executive Committee

Advocates& Social Scientists

= Member Executive Committee

David Aragon Peter Neumann David Jefferson Arthur Keller(chair)

Page 13: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

13

Council

CouncilGroup Technology/Security

Experts

ElectionOfficial/Experts Vendors

(chair)Executive Committee

Advocates& Social Scientists

Federal/StandardsAdvisors

Members at Large

= Member Executive Committee

Page 14: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

14

Council

Area

Example RatingWorking Group

CouncilGroup

Example Model/OverallWorking Group

Technology/SecurityExperts

ElectionOfficial/Experts Vendors

(chair)Executive Committee

Advocates& Social Scientists

Accessibility Secrecy Robustness Operations

Federal/StandardsAdvisors

Members at Large

WG

Accuracy Privacy Integrity Reliability

= Member Executive Committee

= Area Director

= Working Group

WGWG

WGWG

WGWG

WGWG

WG

Page 15: 1. 2 Voting Systems Performance Rating 3 Purpose: develop performance rating standards openly useful, objective and substantially comprehensive for US

15

.org