Upload
hatem-abu-asbeh
View
16
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD 1
[1-‐2] General Background
Hydraulic Analysis
Mohammad N. Almasri
http://sites.google.com/site/mohammadnablus/Home
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
What is the Analysis of WDNs?
§ Analysis of WDNs implies taking the following hydraulic parameters into considera9on:
o Flow distribu9on and water veloci9es in pipes
o Water pressure at nodes
§ In order to be able to analyze a network, you must simulate the water behavior in the WDN
§ To do so, there are two main principles that are u9lized in the network analysis
2
2
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD 3
Main Principles of WDN Analysis
Con9nuity: The algebraic sum of the flow rates in the pipes mee9ng at a node together with any external flows is zero
Q1
Q2
Q3
D (demand)
Q1 + Q2 = Q3 + D D = Q1 + Q2 -‐ Q3
A demand node The node is connected to three pipes
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD 4
Main Principles of Network Analysis
Energy conserva9on: For all paths around closed loops, the accumulated energy loss including minor losses minus any energy gain or heads generated by pumps must be zero
hf1
+ hf3
hf2
hf4
A part of a looped network Closed loop Given total headloss for each link (pipe) as hf
Assume counterclockwise to be posiCve -‐hf1 – hf4 + hf3 + hf2 = 0
3
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
The Outcome of WDN Analysis
The idea from employing the two concepts of WDNs analysis is to determine both the flow in each pipe and the pressure head at each node by
simply developing and solving a set of equa9ons as a func9on of pipe flow
5
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Branched WDNs
6
4
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Branched WDNs with Two Supply Points
7
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Looped Networks
8
5
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD 9
Main Principles of Network Analysis
Pipe Head Loss (m) 1 6.753 2 13.238 3 4.504 4 18.728 5 3.737 6 4.998 7 9.994 8 9.992
What are the flow direc9ons in pipes 5, 6, and 8?
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
Write the con9nuity and energy conserva9on equa9ons for the following network:
10
6
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ First of all, keep in mind two issues: o Nodes provide water or receive water o Links (pipes) convey water to nodes or from nodes
§ General data includes: o Ground surface eleva9on (z) o Nodal demand or supply (q) o Pressure head at the source (P1/γ) o Pipe diameter (D) o Pipe length (L) o Hazen-‐Williams coefficients
11
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ Label the nodal demands and pipe flows in the figure and assume flow direc9ons
§ This is necessary to be able to formulate the equa9ons needed to analyze the network
12
7
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
13
Node ID Con4nuity 1 Q1 = q1 2 Q1 = Q2 + Q3 + q2 3 Q2 = q3 + Q5 4 Q3 = q4 + Q4 5 Q4 + Q5 = q5 + Q6 6 Q6 = q6
Loop Energy Conserva4on 2 – 5 – 4 – 3 hf2 + hf5 – hf4 – hf3 = 0
Solving these equa9ons provides the flow distribu9on in the network
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ Let us take a numerical example that shows the outcome of the hydraulic analysis of this network (that of example [5])
§ The objec9ve is to inspect the solu9on, reflect on the results and make the necessary deduc9ons
§ The following tables summarize the related data
14
8
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example Input Data
15
Link ID Length (m) Diameter (in) CHW 1 [1→2] 1,000 10 120 2 [2→3] 1,000 6 120 3 [2→4] 1,000 6 120 4 [5→4] 1,000 6 120 5 [3→5] 1,000 6 120 6 [5→6] 1,000 4 120
Node ID ElevaCon (m) Demand (CMH) 1 100 (total head) -‐280 2 0 50 3 -‐5 75 4 3 25 5 8 85 6 12 45
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example Analysis
16
Node ID Pressure (m) Head (m) 1 -‐ 100 2 89.47 89.47 3 66.21 61.21 4 65.69 68.69 5 48.09 56.09 6 13.17 25.17
Link ID Flow (CMH) Velocity (m/s) Headloss (m/km) 1 280 1.53 10.53 2 124.51 1.9 28.26 3 105.49 1.61 20.79 4 -‐80.49 1.23 12.6 5 49.51 0.75 5.12 6 45 1.54 30.92
9
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Hydraulics of Sewers Just a Simplified Overview
17
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
A Sewer
18
Sewers do not have a full flow and thus the hydraulics of the sewers compare well with the open flow channel
10
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
The Key Equa9on Manning Equa9on
19
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Hydraulics of Sewers
§ Consider the circular-‐pipe cross sec9on in the figure, where h is the depth of flow and θ is the water-‐surface angle
§ The depth of flow, h, cross-‐sec9onal area, A, and weged perimeter, P, can be expressed in terms of θ by the following geometric rela9ons:
20
11
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
Water flows at a rate of 4 m3/s in a circular concrete sewer of diameter 1,500 mm and a Manning n of 0.015. If the slope of the sewer is 1%, calculate the depth of flow and velocity in the sewer. θ = 3.5 radians
21
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Calcula9on of Normal Depth Example
§ A 3-‐k-‐diameter circular culvert is laid on a slope of 0.005 k/k and is carrying a discharge of 25 cfs
§ If the roughness coefficient of the culvert is 0.012, what is the normal depth for this case?
22
12
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Calcula9on of Normal Depth Example
23
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Calcula9on of Normal Depth Example
24
13
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ A sewer with a flow of 10 cfs enters manhole 6. The distance downstream to manhole 7 is 400 k
§ The finished street surface eleva9on at manhole 6 is 166.3 k and at manhole 7 it is 164.3 k
§ Note that the crown of the pipe must be at least 6 k below the street surface at each manhole
§ For a Manning coefficient of 0.013, find the required standard pipe size to carry the flow under (a) full flow and (b) one-‐half of full flow. The flow velocity must be at least 2 k/s and must not exceed 10 k/s
25
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ The fall of the sewer in 400 k is 2 k if the street grade is used as the slope
§ The ini9al assump9on for S is 5 k/1000 k
§ If this slope is not sufficient to sustain a velocity of 2 fps, it will be increased later (to increase velocity)
§ In like manner, if the calculated velocity exceeds 10 fps, the slope will have to be reduced
26
14
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ Using Manning’s equa9on for Q = 10 and S = 0.005, the closest diameter will be 21 inches
§ This pipe will support a discharge somewhat higher than the design value of 10 cfs, but it is the closest standard size
§ The velocity associated with a 21-‐in pipe flowing full at a slope of 0.005 is between 4 and 5 fps and thus meets the design criteria
27
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Par9ally-‐Full Flow
28
This table helps in finding the design diameter of the pipe when the flow encountered is not full or when we desire that the flow is not to be full
dm d
15
Fall 2012 – 2013 [1] General Background Mohammad N. Almasri, PhD
Example
§ The pipe size for one-‐half flow is calculated from the equa9on:
§ From the table, we note that A×R2/3/(dm)8/3 = 0.1558 for d/dm = 0.5. Subs9tu9ng in Manning’s equa9on gives dm = 2.17 k and the closest standard pipe size is 27 inches
29