21
1 INTRO LOGIC INTRO LOGIC DAY 09 DAY 09

1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

1

INTRO LOGICINTRO LOGICDAY 09DAY 09

Page 2: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

2

UNIT 2UNIT 2DERIVATIONS INDERIVATIONS INSENTENTIAL LOGICSENTENTIAL LOGIC

Page 3: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

3

Basic IdeaBasic Idea

We start with a few argument forms,

which we presume are valid,

and we use these

to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid.

We demonstrate (show) that a given argument form is valid by

derivingderiving (deducing) its conclusion

from its premises

using a few fundamental modes of reasoning.

Page 4: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

4

Example 1 – Modus Ponens (MP)Example 1 – Modus Ponens (MP)

––––––

we can employ modus ponens (MP) to derive the conclusion from the premises.

ifif thenthen ––––––––––

PP QQ RR S––––––S

Example Argument Form

Page 5: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

5

Example 1 (continued) Example 1 (continued)

P ; PQ ; QR ; RS / SMP

QMP

RMP

S

Page 6: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

6

Example 2 – Modus Tollens (MT)Example 2 – Modus Tollens (MT)

we can employ modus tollens (MT) to derive the conclusion from the premises.

Example Argument Form

ifif thenthen not not ––––––––––not not

SR SQ RP Q––––––P

––––––

Page 7: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

7

Example 2 (continued) Example 2 (continued)

S ; RS ; QR ; PQ / PMT

RMT

QMT

P

Page 8: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

8

Example 3 – using both MP and MT Example 3 – using both MP and MT

we can employ a combination of MP and MT to derive the conclusion from the premises.

–––––––

–––––––

SR SR TP TP Q–––––––––Q

Example Argument Form

Page 9: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

9

Example 3 (continued) Example 3 (continued)

S ; RS ; R T ; P T ; P Q QMT

RMP

TMT

PMP

Q

Page 10: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

10

Derivations – How to StartDerivations – How to Start

argument : P ; PQ ; QR ; RS ; / S

1. write down premises

2. write down “:” conclusion

(1) P Pr (premise)

(2) P Q Pr

(3) Q R Pr

(4) R S Pr

(5) : S what one is trying to derive

Page 11: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

11

Derivations – How to ContinueDerivations – How to Continue

(1) P Pr

(premise)

(2) P Q Pr

(premise)

(3) Q R Pr

(premise)

(4) R S Pr

(premise)

(5) : S(goal)

(6) Q

(7) R

(8) S

1,2,MP

3,6,MP

4,7,MP

3. Apply rules, as applicable, to available lines until goal is reached.

follows from

lines 1 and 2

by modus ponens

follows from

lines 3 and 6

by modus ponens

follows from

lines 4 and 7

by modus ponens

Page 12: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

12

Derivations – How to FinishDerivations – How to Finish

4. Box and Cancel

(1) P Pr

(2) P Q Pr

(3) Q R Pr

(4) R S Pr

(5) : S

(6) Q 1,2,MP

(7) R 3,6,MP

(8) S 4,7,MP

DD Direct Derivation

Page 13: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

13

Derivation – Example 2Derivation – Example 2

argument : S ; RS ; QR ; PR ; / P

(1) S Pr

(2) R S Pr

(3) Q R Pr

(4) P Q Pr

(5) : P(6) R(7) Q(8) P

DD

1,2,MT

3,6,MT

4,7,MT

Page 14: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

14

Derivation – Example 3Derivation – Example 3

(1) S Pr

(2) R S Pr

(3) R T Pr

(4) P T Pr

(5) P Q Pr

(6) : Q(7) R(8) T(9) P(10) Q

DD

argument : S ; RS ; RT ; PT ; PQ / Q

1,2,MT

3,7,MP

4,8,MT

5,9,MP

Page 15: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

15

Initial Inference RulesInitial Inference Rules

Modus Tollens

––––––

Modus Ponens

––––––

Modus Tollendo Ponens (1)

––––––

Modus Tollendo Ponens (2)

––––––

Page 16: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

16

Examples of Modus PonensExamples of Modus Ponens

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)P&QP&Q–––––––––––––RRSS

PP QQPP–––––––––QQ

––––––

Page 17: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

17

Examples of Modus TollensExamples of Modus Tollens

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)(R(RS)S)–––––––––––––(P&Q)(P&Q)

PP QQQQ–––––––––PP

––––––

PP QQQQ–––––––––PP

valid argument

BUTNOT an example of MT

Page 18: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

18

Form versus Content/ValueForm versus Content/Value

these ten pennies are worth

are the dime and ten pennies the same?

are they the same in value?

NO

YES

actually, in a very important sense, they are not the same in value!

$2,000,000

Page 19: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

19

Examples of MTP(1)Examples of MTP(1)

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)(P&Q)(P&Q)–––––––––––––RRSS

PP QQPP–––––––––QQ

––––––

Page 20: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

20

Examples of MTP(2)Examples of MTP(2)

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)(R(RS)S)–––––––––––––P&QP&Q

PP QQQQ–––––––––PP

––––––

Page 21: 1 2 3 We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate

21

THE ENDTHE END