09.11.17 Addendum to the Environment Report for WB v4 - Finaldocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/... · 1 of 3 Addendum to the Environemntal and Social Assessment (ESA) Reports for

1 of 3

Addendum to the Environemntal and Social Assessment (ESA) Reports for

Arasinagundi and Anaburu wind farms

This addendum to the Environmental and Social Assessment Report has been

prepared based on the updated information and further stakeholders consultation.

SOCIAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES

Tribal Development Strategy:

As indicated in the IEE, the Project villages (Arasinagandi and Anabur) have a fairly

good proportion of scheduled population including scheduled castes (SC) and

scheduled tribes (ST); majority of them are landless and poor. Around 45% of the

population in these two villages belongs to these two (ST and SC) poor and

vulnerable groups. The project villages have a fair access to various civic amenities

including drinking water, health care, educational institutions, communication and

transport. Both the villages are electrified. With project undertaking various soil and

water conservation measures (including check dams, gully control, etc.), the villages

would get befitted through ground water recharge.

Based on the results of the initial environmental examination of the project and the

stakeholders consultations carried out, the project has been following a strategy to

help the local tribal and other vulnerable sections of the local population. The

important features of this strategy include the following.

No adverse impacts: The project did not involve acquisition of any private land for

its development and as such there are no land losers in the project area. The forest

land allotted to the project for its development was used mainly for animal grazing

by locals. Since the project has not restricted the movement of animals in the project

area, the cattle of the local population continue to graze in the area. Thus the project

does not adversely impact the local population including St and SC people of the

area.

Wage employment: As part of the strategy to help weaker sections of the

community including tribals in the vicinity to access project benefits, the project

informs the nearby villagers about the employment opportunity that exists in the

wind farms and the skill sets required. Based on the applications, the eligible

employment seekers with requisite skills and fund suitable are shortlisted. Presently,

about 50% of the indirect employment (through contractors) under the project is

local labour. List of people employed is provided (Annexure 1).

Socio-cultural activities: The project has been supporting a number of socio-

cultural activities in the area. Some of these include the following:

1. Contributed to rebuild/renovate local temple in the village(s);

2. Provided clear access to a temple situated at one of the locations at

the project site that was previously designated for a turbine.

3. The location of the turbine was changed to accommodate the

requirement of the local people at Anaburu to access temple;

4. The project ensures that there is no restriction to grazing of animals

belonging to the local people, or their access through the site for other

purposes.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb20439

Typewritten Text

E2298 v3

2 of 3

Complying with statutory requirements: Project contractors have been

instructed to comply with all the statutory requirements that have already been

included in the contract. These include minimum wages as per norms of the

Minimum Wages Act, make no discrimination between employing men and women,

and not to employ child labour. They have been asked to prefer employment for local

labour, as far as possible, and the results are seen in the people employed (nearly

50% of labour force is from local areas). For future, this will be made part of the

contract agreement to give preference (as far as possible) to local labour to the

extent the requisite skills are available.

Grievance handling: The project has so far not received a grievance of any serious

nature from the local people. However, a contact person will be designated to

receive and address any grievances in future. In order to handle any

grievances/problems of the local people with regard to the project, the Project will

provide the name of the contact person for each site and their contact numbers with

whom local people could get in touch for any information or registering complaints.

And if any local person approaches the project with a written complaint, it would be

received by site people so it will help in tracking the resolution of any grievance.

Stakeholders’ Consultations

The project had undertaken a number of stakeholders’ consultations as part of the

CDM registration process, more than is normally done for this purpose. These

consultations were through meetings with individuals, local groups, elected

representatives and the staff of the KSPCB, KPTCL and relevant government

departments, particularly belonging to the Departments of Revenue and Forest. An

all stakeholders’ consultation was organized on August 3, 2007. The following

Communication methods were used to inform the stakeholder about the meeting

date, venue and purpose of the stakeholders’ meeting (much of this is not reflected

in the CDM PDD).

Personal meetings: On individual basis, With stakeholders on 30-July-2007 with

Winrock International held meetings were with local villagers and Gram Panchayat

members at Anaburu and Thoranaghatte villages, BESCOM, and Karnataka State

Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) to brief them on the projects and invite them to the

Stakeholder’s Meeting on 3-August 2007 (previously scheduled for a day earlier).

Annexure 2 evidences some persons met with their signatures.

Communication through individual letters: Winrock International sent individual

letter (on 20-August-2007) to BESCOM, KERC, KSPCB requesting them to attend the

proposed stakeholders meeting.

Newspaper advertisement: As it appears in the PDD, this was given in the local

newspaper for information of general public.

Stakeholders meeting on 3-August-2007: As evidenced in the PDD, this has

been well documented along with the signatures of the participants and photographs

of the meeting. In this meeting the representatives of all major villages in the

vicinity, and also BESCOM, Vestas, Acciona and some contractors working with the

project had actively participated in the discussion.

Independent stakeholders’ meeting by DNV:

3 of 3

Structured interviews were held with some of the stakeholders which were conducted

by DNV during validation to confirm the facts stated by the company and/or

mentioned in the PDD with the stakeholders. This is detailed in their Validation

Report submitted to the UNFCCC – attached as Annexure 3. A briefing note on the

project and its likely impact was distributed and comments invited in this meeting on

various aspects of the project. No comments were received in writing.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES

Compliance with conditions for use of forest land:

Afforestation has been completed by the forest department on compensatory land

handed over by the project in lieu of the use of forest land for the project. Necessary

report confirming the same has been obtained from the forest ranger with

photographs;

Necessary medicinal plantations, boundary markings, painting of red bands on

blades and other conditions have been complied. Land to be transferred to the Forest

Department in lieu of additional forest land (4.94ha) that had to be used during

implementation (for realignment of lines/road due to difficult site conditions at

Anaburu) has already been identified and the entire transfer process is expected to

be completed by June 2010.

Waste management plan: This is in place (see Annexure 4) and is being adhered

to by Vestas, the O&M contractors.

Non-usage of harmful chemicals: The project does not use any harmful chemicals

for de-weeding or cleaning of project site premises. This is done manually.

Water-harvesting at project sites: The project will examine the feasibility of

undertaking water harvesting measures at the project sites from all aspects,

including discussion with the local offices of the forest department.

HIV/AIDS: Since the project attracts outside labour force, the Project will undertake

measures to prevent incidence of HIV/AIDS in the form of approaching the

Karnataka AIDS Control Society for information that can be made available for

HIV/AIDS control, assess the input and make this information available

Annexure - 1

VESTAS

1 Sivakumar.S ASM Tirunelveli Tamilnadu AG & AN site2 KarthikBalaji.T Site Incharge Chennai Tamilnadu AG & AN site3 Shankar.S.R SS Incharge Coimbatore Tamilnadu Hiremallanahole SS4 Nagaraj.T Team Leader Mandapam camp Tamilnadu AG site5 Sachin S Bakale Team Leader Gadag Karnataka AN site6 Arun Kumar Raja.K Engineer Tirunelveli Tamilnadu AG & AN site7 Karthik.S Junior Engineer Thovalai Tamilnadu AN site8 Sengottaiyan.V Junior Engineer Mathayankuttai Tamilnadu AN site9 Veerabhadraswamy.T Technician Guilal Karnataka AG site

10 Selvakumar.S Technician Kottavillai Tamilnadu AG site

BATLIBOI

1 Rajakumar.K Site Incharge Aralvoimozhi Tamilnadu AG & AN site2 Kiran kumar.C P Technician Chikkamanahatti Karnataka AN site3 Rudresh P Mechanic Bommakana halli Karnataka AN site4 Subramania naik B K Mechanic Anaburu Karnataka AN site5 Ravi Y Trainee KanaKatte Karnataka AN site6 Vijay kumar G R Trainee Anaburu Karnataka AN site7 Ajjaiah K Electrician Kanamadugu Karnataka AN site8 Thipperudra K R Trainee Kanamadugu Karnataka AN site9 Shivarajakumar N Trainee Bommakana halli Karnataka AN site

10 Channaveeraswamy K M Trainee Kanamadugu Karnataka AN site11 Vibinjohn J Technician Aralvoimozhi Tamilnadu AN site12 Nagaraja K B Mechanic Marahana halli Karnataka AG site13 Mallikarjuna K J Electrician Lingnanahalli Karnataka AG site14 Sivakumar S M Mechanic Jagalur Karnataka AG site15 Suderson M Trainee Thuckalay Tamilnadu AG site16 Jebaribson R Technician Aralvoimozhi Tamilnadu AG site17 Bibin P Trainee karunkal Tamilnadu AG site18 Manojkumar A T Trainee Jagalur Karnataka AG site19 Maruthi P Trainee Bommakana halli Karnataka AG site

VOLTECH

1 Nandha Kumar.R SS Incharge Salem Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS2 Srinivasan.T Shift Incharge Thirumulaivayal Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS3 Antovijay.A Shift Incharge Ambai Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS4 Masilamani.C Shift Incharge Neyveli Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS5 Udhayakumar.M Shift Incharge Vellore Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS6 Fayaz basha Line Incharge Jagalur Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS7 Soma sekar.C.O Technician T.P.Halli Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS8 Vijay .K Technician Tumminakatti Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS9 Ananda moorthy.T.G Technician Challakere Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS

10 Pappanna.T Line man Chithradurga Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS11 Krishna.G.C Line man Hulikere Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS12 Kishorekumar K.G Line man Obaiahnahatti Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS13 Dada kalandar G.M Line man Goguddu Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS14 Pranesha .C Line man Thayitoni Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS15 Thipperudraiah .T Technician Obaiahnahatti Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS16 Chandrappa Technician Hiremallanahole Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS

Employee NameSL.No SiteStateNative PlaceDesignation

Annexure - 1

VESTAS

1 Sivakumar.S ASM Tirunelveli Tamilnadu AG & AN site2 KarthikBalaji.T Site Incharge Chennai Tamilnadu AG & AN site3 Shankar.S.R SS Incharge Coimbatore Tamilnadu Hiremallanahole SS4 Nagaraj.T Team Leader Mandapam camp Tamilnadu AG site5 Sachin S Bakale Team Leader Gadag Karnataka AN site6 Arun Kumar Raja.K Engineer Tirunelveli Tamilnadu AG & AN site7 Karthik.S Junior Engineer Thovalai Tamilnadu AN site8 Sengottaiyan.V Junior Engineer Mathayankuttai Tamilnadu AN site9 Veerabhadraswamy.T Technician Guilal Karnataka AG site

10 Selvakumar.S Technician Kottavillai Tamilnadu AG site

BATLIBOI

1 Rajakumar.K Site Incharge Aralvoimozhi Tamilnadu AG & AN site2 Kiran kumar.C P Technician Chikkamanahatti Karnataka AN site3 Rudresh P Mechanic Bommakana halli Karnataka AN site4 Subramania naik B K Mechanic Anaburu Karnataka AN site5 Ravi Y Trainee KanaKatte Karnataka AN site6 Vijay kumar G R Trainee Anaburu Karnataka AN site7 Ajjaiah K Electrician Kanamadugu Karnataka AN site8 Thipperudra K R Trainee Kanamadugu Karnataka AN site9 Shivarajakumar N Trainee Bommakana halli Karnataka AN site

10 Channaveeraswamy K M Trainee Kanamadugu Karnataka AN site11 Vibinjohn J Technician Aralvoimozhi Tamilnadu AN site12 Nagaraja K B Mechanic Marahana halli Karnataka AG site13 Mallikarjuna K J Electrician Lingnanahalli Karnataka AG site14 Sivakumar S M Mechanic Jagalur Karnataka AG site15 Suderson M Trainee Thuckalay Tamilnadu AG site16 Jebaribson R Technician Aralvoimozhi Tamilnadu AG site17 Bibin P Trainee karunkal Tamilnadu AG site18 Manojkumar A T Trainee Jagalur Karnataka AG site19 Maruthi P Trainee Bommakana halli Karnataka AG site

VOLTECH

1 Nandha Kumar.R SS Incharge Salem Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS2 Srinivasan.T Shift Incharge Thirumulaivayal Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS3 Antovijay.A Shift Incharge Ambai Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS4 Masilamani.C Shift Incharge Neyveli Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS5 Udhayakumar.M Shift Incharge Vellore Tamil nadu Hiremallanahole SS6 Fayaz basha Line Incharge Jagalur Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS7 Soma sekar.C.O Technician T.P.Halli Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS8 Vijay .K Technician Tumminakatti Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS9 Ananda moorthy.T.G Technician Challakere Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS

10 Pappanna.T Line man Chithradurga Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS11 Krishna.G.C Line man Hulikere Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS12 Kishorekumar K.G Line man Obaiahnahatti Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS13 Dada kalandar G.M Line man Goguddu Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS14 Pranesha .C Line man Thayitoni Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS15 Thipperudraiah .T Technician Obaiahnahatti Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS16 Chandrappa Technician Hiremallanahole Karnataka Hiremallanahole SS

Employee NameSL.No SiteStateNative PlaceDesignation

VALIDATION REPORT

29.7 MW Wind Power Project

in Karnataka, India

REPORT NO. 2007-1094 REVISION NO. 01

DET NORSKE VERITAS CERTIFICATION AS

VALIDATION REPORT

DET NORSKE VERITAS DNV CERTIFICATION AS

Veritasveien 1 N-1322 Høvik Norway http://www.dnv.com

Date of first issue: Project No.:

01-11-2007 46071094 Approved by: Organisational unit:

Mari Grooss Viddal DNV Certification, International Climate Change Services.

Client: Client ref.:

Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd Mr.Rajnish K.Sapra

Project Name: 29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India Country: India Methodology: ACM 0002 Version: 6 GHG reducing Measure/Technology: “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources” ER estimate: 86942 t CO2 eq per year over the ten year crediting period. Size

Large Scale Small Scale

Validation Phases: Desk Review Follow up interviews Resolution of outstanding issues

Validation Status Corrective Actions Requested Clarifications Requested Full Approval and submission for registration Rejected

In summary, it is DNV’s opinion that the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India India ”, as described in the PDD of version 02 dated January 2007, meets all relevant UNFCCC requirements for the CDM and correctly applies the approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0002 (Version 06, 19 May 2006). Hence, DNV requests the registration of the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India” by Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd (AWEPL) as a CDM project activity.

Report No.: Date of this revision: Rev. No. Key words:

2007-1094 05-06-2008 01 Report title:

“29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, IndiaIndia

Validation

Work carried out by:

Ramesh Ramachandran, Murali Govindarajulu

No distribution without permission from the Client or responsible organisational unit

Work verified by: Limited distribution

Kakaraparthi Venkata Raman Unrestricted distribution


VALIDATION REPORT

CDM Validation 2007-1094, rev. 01 i

Abbreviations CAR Corrective Action Request

CDM Clean Development Mechanism

CEF Carbon Emission Factor

CER Certified Emission Reduction

CL Clarification request

CO2 Carbon dioxide

CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent

DNV Det Norske Veritas

DNA Designated National Authority

GHG Greenhouse gas(es)

GWP Global Warming Potential

HSD High Sulphur Deisel

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

MP Monitoring Plan

MVP Monitoring and Verification Plan

NGO Non-governmental Organisation

ODA Official Development Assistance

PDD Project Design Document

UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change


VALIDATION REPORT

CDM Validation 2007-1094, rev. 01 ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – VALIDATION OPINION ..........................................1

2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................2

2.1 Objective 2 2.2 Scope 2

3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................3

3.1 Desk Review of the Project Design Documentation 3 3.2 Follow-up Interviews with Project Stakeholders 4

3.3 Resolution of Outstanding Issues 4

3.4 Internal Quality Control 5 3.5 Validation Team 5

4 VALIDATION FINDINGS ......................................................................................7

4.1 Participation Requirements 7

4.2 Project Design 7 4.3 Baseline Determination 7

4.4 Additionality 8 4.5 Monitoring 11

4.6 Estimate of GHG Emissions 11

4.7 Environmental Impacts 12 4.8 Comments by Local Stakeholders 12

4.9 Comments by Parties, Stakeholders and NGOs 12

Appendix A: Validation Protocol

Appendix B: Certificates of Competence


VALIDATION REPORT

CDM Validation 2007-1094, rev. 01 1

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – VALIDATION OPINION Det Norske Veritas Certification AS has performed a validation of the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India”, on the basis of UNFCCC criteria for the CDM, as well as criteria given to provide for consistent project operations, monitoring and reporting. UNFCCC criteria refer to Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol, the CDM modalities and procedures and the subsequent decisions by the CDM Executive Board.

The project participants are Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd from the host Party India. Host Party India fulfils all the participation criteria and has approved the project and authorized the project participant. Approval of voluntary participation by the Designated National Authority (DNA) of India and confirmation that the project assists in achieving sustainable development has also been obtained.

The project correctly applies the approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM 0002“Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources”, version 6. The project involves generation of renewable energy by installing wind electricity generators (WEGs) which will partly displace the electricity generation in the fossil fuel dominated Southern regional grid of India, thereby resulting in the reduction of GHG emissions that are real, measurable and give long-term benefits to the mitigation of climate change. It is demonstrated that the project is not a likely baseline scenario. Emission reductions attributable to the project are hence additional to any that would occur in the absence of the project activity.

The project is estimated to result in emission reductions of 86942 t CO2 per year over the total 10 year fixed crediting period. The emission reduction forecast has been checked and it is deemed likely that the stated amount is achieved given that the underlying assumptions do not change.

The monitoring plan makes sufficient provision for monitoring relevant project and baseline emission indicators. Detailed responsibilities and authorities for project management, monitoring and reporting and QA/QC procedures have also been addressed.

In summary, it is DNV‘s opinion that the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India” as described in the revised PDD of version 02 dated January 2008, meets all relevant UNFCCC requirements for the CDM and correctly applies the consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0002 version 06. DNV thus requests the registration of the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India” as a CDM project activity.


VALIDATION REPORT


2 INTRODUCTION Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd (AWEPL) has commissioned Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd to perform a validation of the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India (hereafter called “the project”). This report summarises the findings of the validation of the project, performed on the basis of UNFCCC criteria for the CDM, as well as criteria given to provide for consistent project operations, monitoring and reporting. UNFCCC criteria refer to Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol, the CDM modalities and procedures and the subsequent decisions by the CDM Executive Board.

2.1 Objective The purpose of a validation is to have an independent third party assess the project design. In particular, the project's baseline, monitoring plan, and the project’s compliance with relevant UNFCCC and host Party criteria are validated in order to confirm that the project design, as documented, is sound and reasonable and meets the identified criteria. Validation is a requirement for all CDM projects and is seen as necessary to provide assurance to stakeholders of the quality of the project and its intended generation of certified emission reductions (CERs).

2.2 Scope The validation scope is defined as an independent and objective review of the project design document (PDD). The PDD is reviewed against the criteria stated in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol, the CDM modalities and procedures as agreed in the Marrakech Accords and the relevant decisions by the CDM Executive Board, including the approved baseline and monitoring methodology ACM 0002. The validation team has, based on the recommendations in the Validation and Verification Manual employed a risk-based approach, focusing on the identification of significant risks for project implementation and the generation of CERs. The validation is not meant to provide any consulting towards the project participants. However, stated requests for clarifications and/or corrective actions may have provided input for improvement of the project design.


VALIDATION REPORT


3 METHODOLOGY The validation consisted of the following three phases:

I a desk review of the project design documents II follow-up interviews with project stakeholders

III the resolution of outstanding issues and the issuance of the final validation report and opinion.

The following sections outline each step in more detail.

3.1 Desk Review of the Project Design Documentation The following table lists the documentation that was reviewed during the validation:

/1/ Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd: PDD of the “29.7 MW Wind Power project in Karnataka”, Version 01, August 2007 and Version 2 of January 2008.

/2/ DNA Letter of Approval Dated 17 March 2008.

/3/ International Emission Trading Association (IETA) & the World Bank’s Prototype Carbon Fund (PCF): Validation and Verification Manual. http://www.vvmanual.info

/4/ ACM 0002, version 06, “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources”

/5/ Minutes of the Board of directors of Accion Wind Energy Private Limited dated 18 April 2007.

/6/ Contracts for supply of equipments for Phase I on 27 April 2007 and for Phase II on 20 September 2007.

/7/ Contracts for Maintenance, Service and Availability for Phase I on 27 April 2007 and for Phase II on 20 September 2007.

/8/ Contracts for Erection and Commissioning for Phase I on 27 April 2007 and Phase II on 20 September 2007

/9/ Agreement between Govt of Karnataka and Accion Wind energy Pvt. Ltd. to develop the wind farm..dtd 20 June 2007.

/10/ Substation agreement dtd. 27 April 2007.

/11/ Development agreement between Vestas Wind Technologies and AWEPL dtd 20 September 2007

/12/ Evacuation approval from KPTCL dtd 12 July 2007.

/13/ Letters of approval from Minister of environment and forests for the transfer of lease of the land to Accion Wind Energy Private limited dtd 18 October 2007.

/14/ Certificate from the third party charted accountant on the project financials and assumptions dated 17 November 2007..

/15/ Letters from the equipment suppliers dated 26 March 2008 and 28 March 2008.


VALIDATION REPORT


3.2 Follow-up Interviews with Project Stakeholders

Date Name Organization Topic

/16/ 2007 -10 -31 Mr. Rajinish Sapra

Mr.Rajesekhar Budhavarapu Mr. P. Prasanth Vittal

Mr. Dhirendra

Mr. Sriskandh Subramaniam. Mr. Vidhya Murthy

Mr.Manjunath,

Accion Wind Energy Pvt Ltd.

Winrock International India

Assistant Executive Engineer (A.E.E) of BESCOM

� Project Technology and additionality

� Estimated emission reductions.

� Calculation of CEF. � Technology applied and

operational lifetime. � Monitoring and reporting

procedures. � Calibration, internal audit

and corrective action procedures.

� Provisions for training, operation and maintenance.

� Environmental compliance � Legal Compliance and

present power situation in the state of Karnataka.

3.3 Resolution of Outstanding Issues The objective of this phase of the validation was to resolve any outstanding issues which needed be clarified prior to Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd’s positive conclusion on the project design. In order to ensure transparency a validation protocol was customised for the project. The protocol shows in a transparent manner the criteria (requirements), means of verification and the results from validating the identified criteria. The validation protocol serves the following purposes:

• It organises, details and clarifies the requirements a CDM project is expected to meet; • It ensures a transparent validation process where the validator will document how a

particular requirement has been validated and the result of the validation.

The validation protocol consists of three tables. The different columns in these tables are described in the figure below. The completed validation protocol for the “29.7 MW Wind Power Project in Karnataka, India is enclosed in Appendix A to this report.


VALIDATION REPORT


Findings established during the validation can either be seen as a non-fulfilment of CDM criteria or where a risk to the fulfilment of project objectives is identified. Corrective action requests (CAR) are issued, where:

i) mistakes have been made with a direct influence on project results; ii) CDM and/or methodology specific requirements have not been met; or iii) there is a risk that the project would not be accepted as a CDM project or that

emission reductions will not be certified.

A request for clarification (CL) may be used where additional information is needed to fully clarify an issue.

3.4 Internal Quality Control The draft validation report including the initial validation findings underwent a technical review before being submitted to the project participants. The final validation report will undergo another technical review before requesting registration of the project activity. The technical review will be performed by a technical reviewer qualified in accordance with Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd’s qualification scheme for CDM validation and verification.

3.5 Validation Team Role/Qualification Name Country

Team Leader/ CDM Validator

Ramesh Ramachandran DNV, India

GHG Auditor Murali Govindarajulu DNV, India Sector expert Michael Lehmann DNV, Oslo Technical reviewer Kakaraparthi Venkata Raman DNV, India

The qualification of each individual validation team member is detailed in Appendix B to this report.


VALIDATION REPORT


Validation Protocol Table 1: Mandatory Requirements for CDM Project Activities

Requirement Reference Conclusion

The requirements the project must meet.

Gives reference to the legislation or agreement where the requirement is found.

This is either acceptable based on evidence provided (OK ), a Corrective Action Request (CAR) of risk or non-compliance with stated requirements or a request for Clarification (CL) where further clarifications are needed.

Validation Protocol Table 2: Requirement checklist

Checklist Question Reference Means of verification (MoV)

Comment Draft and/or Final Conclusion

The various requirements in Table 2 are linked to checklist questions the project should meet. The checklist is organised in different sections, following the logic of the large-scale PDD template, version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006. Each section is then further sub-divided.

Gives reference to documents where the answer to the checklist question or item is found.

Explains how conformance with the checklist question is investigated. Examples of means of verification are document review (DR) or interview (I). N/A means not applicable.

The section is used to elaborate and discuss the checklist question and/or the conformance to the question. It is further used to explain the conclusions reached.

This is either acceptable based on evidence provided (OK), or a corrective action request (CAR) due to non-compliance with the checklist question (See below). A request for clarification (CL) is used when the validation team has identified a need for further clarification.

Validation Protocol Table 3: Resolution of Corrective Action and Clarification Requests

Draft report clarifications and corrective action requests

Ref. to checklist question in table 2

Summary of project owner response

Validation conclusion

If the conclusions from the draft Validation are either a CAR or a CL, these should be listed in this section.

Reference to the checklist question number in Table 2 where the CAR or CL is explained.

The responses given by the project participants during the communications with the validation team should be summarised in this section.

This section should summarise the validation team’s responses and final conclusions. The conclusions should also be included in Table 2, under “Final Conclusion”.

Figure 1 Validation protocol tables


VALIDATION REPORT


4 VALIDATION FINDINGS The findings of the validation are stated in the following sections. The validation criteria (requirements), the means of verification and the results from validating the identified criteria are documented in more detail in the validation protocol in Appendix A. The final validation findings related to the project design as documented and described in the revised project design documentation of version 02 dated January 2008.

4.1 Participation Requirements The project is developed as a unilateral project by Accion Wind Energy Pvt Ltd. (AWEPL), the project proponent. The host Party India, meet all the participation requirements. The DNA of India has approved the project on 17 March 2008 /2/, authorizing Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd as project participant and confirmed that the project contributes to the sustainable development in India. The validation process has not revealed any diversion of ODA funding towards the project activity.

4.2 Project Design The project activity envisages the installation of 18 wind energy generators (WEGs) each rated at 1.65 MW, thereby aggregating to a total installed capacity of 29.7 MW in Davangere district, Karnataka, India. The project activity will export the generated electricity to the southern regional grid of India.

All the WEGs are supplied by Vestas Technology Pvt Ltd. and the installation, commissioning, operation and maintenance of the WEGs is in the scope of Vestas Technology Pvt Ltd. The project envisages underground cabling of the transmission lines from the WEGs to the substation, which is not a common practice in India. The step up transformer involved in the project will be housed in a RCC structure. The project design and engineering reflects good practice. The technology used in the project activity is indigenously available in India and no transfer of technology is envisaged. The expected operational lifetime of the project technology is 20 years. A fixed crediting period of ten years starting from the date of the registration of the project has been selected. The starting date of the project activity is stated to be 18 April 2007 which is the date of approval from the board of directors for the wind farm project. The necessary document for this has been verified by DNV/5/. The project is estimated to reduce 86942 t CO2e per year for the duration of the crediting period chosen.

4.3 Baseline Determination The project applies the approved consolidated baseline methodologies for the CDM project activity ACM002 (version 06) titled “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources.” The selected baseline scenario is that an equivalent amount of electricity would, in the absence of the project activity, have been generated by the operation of grid-connected thermal power plants and by the addition of new generation sources.

As the project activity supplies electricity to the Karnataka state electricity grid which forms a part of the southern region electricity grid, the baseline for this project activity is a function of


VALIDATION REPORT


the generation mix of the southern region grid. The selection of the southern region grid as the grid system boundary for the project activity is in line with the recent EB guidance for large countries such as India. Owing to the intermittent and non-dispatchable nature of the wind and hydro projects the weights for OM and BM has been taken as 75:25, in line with the guidance provided in the methodology. The combined margin emission coefficient for the southern grid of India has been calculated at 0.93 kg CO2e/kWh, and has been sourced from CEA data. The Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power, Government of India has published a database of carbon dioxide emission factors from the power sector in India based on detailed authenticated information obtained from all operating power stations in the country (“CO2 Baseline Database”1) This CO2 baseline database provides information about the OM and BM factors of all the regional electricity grids in India. DNV confirms that the database is an official publication of the Government of India for the purpose of CDM baselines and the OM in the CEA database is calculated ex ante using the simple OM approach based on the generation-weighted average emissions per electricity unit of all fossil-fuelled generating sources serving the system over a three year period of 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 /20/. BM is calculated ex ante based on 20% most recent capacity additions in the grid based on net generation as described in ACM0002 version 6. The operating margin has been determined to be 1.003 kg CO2e/kWh and the build margin to be 0.71 kg CO2e/kWh.

4.4 Additionality The additionality of the project activity is demonstrated using the “Tool for demonstration of additionality” Version 3.

The early consideration of CDM has been evidenced from the minutes of the Board of Directors meeting, dated 18 April 2007 /5/. The agreement for the construction of Phase I of the project was signed on 27 April 2007 subsequent to approval from the board of directors. The PDD was completed in August 2007 and submitted for validation subsequently. The first phase of the project activity comprising 13.2 MW of generation was commissioned in June 2008 and the second phase is expected to be commissioned during July 2008.

Step 1: Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and regulations Three alternatives have been identified for the project activity: a.) Implementing the project activity without CDM. b) Implementing a similar scale fossil fuel based power plant and c) Continuing with the current situation - Power generation from the grid connected power and by new capacity additions The alternative b) has been eliminated as the project proponent AWEPL does not have any experience in fossil fuel power plants and it is not their core competency as is renewable power generation. The alternative identified complies with all applicable laws and is thus considered to be a possible baseline scenario. Step 2: Investment analysis

1 http://www.cea.nic.in/planning/c%20and%20e/Govertment%20of%20India%20website.htm


VALIDATION REPORT


An investment analysis has been presented by Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd, using the project as basis to assess the financial attractiveness of the project activity. It has been demonstrated that the project IRR without any CDM revenues is estimated to be 11.93%. The Project IRR is lower than the benchmark IRR of 14.25% adopted by the Project participant. As per the” Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality” a relevant benchmark for a project’s IRR can be derived from the local commercial lending rates increased by the suitable risk premium to reflect the private investment or project type. In line with this the benchmark has been derived from the commercial lending rate applicable to this project raised by the country specific risk premium indicated by the OECD2. The average lending rate of 11.25% at which the project proponent has sourced finances raised by the country specific risk premium of 3% indicated by OECD has been considered for the arriving at the benchmark of 14.25%. The documents from the banks on the lending rates have been verified by DNV and are found to be appropriate. The IRR improves to 15.69% on considering CDM revenues. The financial worksheets have been evidenced and verified to be correct. The assumptions used, the base documents and the financial workings have also been verified and certified by third party chartered accountants. All documents pertaining to the source of input values presented in the analysis have been verified by DNV from the following documents.

• Contracts for supply of the equipments • Contracts for Erection and commissioning • Contracts for Maintenance, Service and availability • Substation agreement • Development agreement. • Tariff as per KERC order

Contract signing for phase I was only a few days after the investment decisions and the investment decision was thus based on the above mentioned contracts. The incentives from the Government of India for the renewable energy projects have been taken in to consideration for the financial analysis. A barrier for the project activity is also that the main incentive of accelerated depreciation realizable by the other companies in India while investing in renewable energy projects cannot be realized by the project proponent since the company AWEPL does not have any other operations in India. Step 2d: Sensitivity analysis: A sensitivity analysis has also been conducted for variations in the range of +/- 10% for the parameters of plant load factor and +/- 05% for the project costs. The level of variation assumed for the sensitivity analysis has been suitably justified with relevant documents pertaining to the presented analysis and has been verified by DNV, such as

• The basis for the assumed plant load factor (PLF) of 36.47% in the PDD is the independent Micro sitting study conducted by Accion. It was also observed that at a plant load factor of 40.12%, the IRR of the project is below the benchmark of 14.25%. However based on the independent micro siting study conducted for individual locations and the documents related to the wind assessment studies, DNV has verified the independent

2 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/29/3782900.pdf


VALIDATION REPORT


micro sitting details and is of the opinion that the plant load factor of 36.47% already considered is an conservative figure and it is therefore deemed unlikely that the plant load factor would increase by 10%. The judgement is also based on the experience and knowledge of similar WEG plant data already operating in the same region.

• The project has been contracted on a turn key basis to Vestas Technology Pvt Ltd by the project proponent AWEPL/6/,/7/,/8/&/10/. It was also observed that if the project cost goes down by 20% then the IRR touches the benchmark of 14.25%. However this is not a likely scenario in DNVs opinion as the project has been contracted on a turn key basis and the project cost is not likely to have any increase or decrease.. In the worst case scenario, there can only be an escalation in the project cost (which decreases the IRR) and not a decrease (which would increase the IRR of the project). Hence the consideration of 5% increase is justified.

• It is also DNV’s opinion, that the operation and maintenance cost for the project amount to only 2.82% of the investment cost in the initial year and hence not considered for the sensitivity analysis (being less than 20%). It is also DNV opinion that the operation and maintenance cost would only increase and are not likely to come down, which would further reduce the IRR of the project.

• The tariff of the generated electricity has been fixed for a period of 10 years as per the Karnataka Electricity Regulation Authority, Tariff order dated 18 January 2005 and the PPA will be signed as per the tariff order.(as stated in CL of table three, converted to FAR for verification in the initial verification). The tariff may have a marginal increase after the first 10 years period. Even though the revenue from the tariff amounts to more than 20% of the revenue, the tariff is fixed for the first 10 year period, and may show a marginal increase subsequently. Since the tariff will not increase in the first ten years, this parameter has not been considered for the sensitivity analysis and is reasonable.

It has been demonstrated that the IRR with the above sensitivity analysis is always less than the benchmark IRR of 14.25%. Further, the financial analysis including the assumptions for the sensitivity analysis has been certified by an independent third party charted accountant/14/ and the benchmark has been verified by DNV and thus the financial analysis and the benchmark adopted for the project activity is found to be appropriate.

Step 3: Barrier analysis

The arguments presented in the barrier analysis are generic in DNVs opinion.

Step 4: Common practice analysis

Under the common practice analysis, the argument that the private wind farm promoters with an installed capacity of more than 20MW have considered CDM has been demonstrated with the data on the status of the mentioned projects. Among the total power generation through all sources in Karnataka only 2.04% of the power is generated from wind energy and the data from the Karnataka electricity regulation commission has been provided in the PDD.

The project activity also has all underground internal cabling, which is not a common practice in the wind farms in India. It has been demonstrated that for wind power projects of similar types and capacities, it is common practice to provide overheads cabling, which represent proven practice, are economical and have less perceived operational problems.


VALIDATION REPORT


Communication between the equipment supplier and the EPC contractors have been provided to demonstrate that providing underground cabling for internal transmission lines and providing RCC housing for the transformers are first of its kind in India /15/.

The above mentioned arguments demonstrate that the project is not a likely baseline scenario and that emission reductions from the project are indeed additional.

4.5 Monitoring The project applies the consolidated monitoring methodology ACM0002 (version 06) titled “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources.” The monitoring methodology is applicable and justified for the proposed project as the project involves electricity capacity additions through renewable sources. Details of the parameters covered under the monitoring plan are stated in the following sections.

4.5.1 Parameters determined ex-ante Baseline emission factor for the southern regional grid is established ex-ante based on the approved methodology using a combined margin approach. The combined margin emission coefficient for the southern regional grid of India has been determined to be 0.93 kg CO2e / kWh. The operating margin has been estimated to be 1.003 kg CO2 /kWh and the build margin to be 0.71 kg CO2/kWh. The emission coefficients are determined from official data published by the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) of India in ‘CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector’ as stated in section 4.3 of this report. The calculations and assumptions have been verified and found to be correct by DNV.

4.5.2 Parameters monitored ex-post The monitoring will involve metering of the net electricity exported to grid. Details of the data collection and frequency of data recording and associated formats are described and found to be adequate.

4.5.3 Management system and quality assurance The responsibilities and authorities for project management, procedures for monitoring and reporting, and QA/QC procedures have been systematically established and formalized. Data will be saved both electronically and on paper and archived until 2 years after the end of the crediting period.

4.6 Estimate of GHG Emissions The calculations are well documented in line with the consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0002, version 06. The project is electricity generation from the wind power and no project emissions and leakage is associated with the project activity. The emission factor has been computed to be 0.93 kg CO2e/kWh of electric power generated and is fixed ex-ante for the entire crediting period of ten years. The project is expected to result in emission reductions of 86942 t CO2 per year during the crediting period. The calculations are transparently documented and conservative assumptions regarding expected amount of electricity generation have been deemed to be made.


VALIDATION REPORT


4.7 Environmental Impacts As per the MoEF, an environmental impact assessment is not required for projects costing less than USD 22 million, as is the case of the proposed project. The possible environmental impacts due to the project activity have been identified to be negligible and have been listed in the PDD. Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd has obtained the approval from government of India to establish the wind farm vide letters from Ministry of Environment and Forests dated 18th October 2007 and DNV has verified the letters. The project participant shall obtain the PPA before putting the plant into actual operation.

4.8 Comments by Local Stakeholders Under Indian Legislation, local stakeholder consultation process for wind power projects is not warranted. Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd have organized a meeting involving the local panchayat and ensured a direct consultation with relevant stakeholders from the local community and relevant governmental bodies. The meetings have been conducted on 03rd August 2007. Prior to the meeting an advertisement has been placed in the local newspaper on 28th July 2007 inviting interested parties to comment on the project. DNV has verified the minutes of the stakeholder meeting held on 3rd August 2007 also few stake holders were interviewed during the site visit. The local stakeholders support the project and no modifications to the project design were necessary.

4.9 Comments by Parties, Stakeholders and NGOs The PDD of August 2007 was made publicly available on Accion Wind Energy Pvt. Ltd’s climate change website (www.dnv.com/certification/climatechange) and Parties, stakeholders and NGOs were through the CDM website invited to provide comments during a 30 days period from 09 September 2007 to 08 October 2007. No comment was received.

DET NORSKE VERITAS CERTIFICATON AS

APPENDIX A

CDM VALIDATION PROTOCOL

DET NORSKE VERITAS CERTIFICATION AS 29.7 MW WIND POWER PROJECT IN KARNATAKA

CDM Validation 2007-1094, rev. 01 A-1

Table 1 Mandatory Requirements for Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Project Activities Requirement Reference Conclusion

About Parties

1. The project shall assist Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with part of their emission reduction commitment under Art. 3.

Kyoto Protocol Art.12.2 OK

2. The project shall assist non-Annex I Parties in contributing to the ultimate objective of the UNFCCC.

Kyoto Protocol Art.12.2. OK

3. The project shall have the written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved.

Kyoto Protocol Art. 12.5a, CDM Modalities and Procedures §40a

OK

CAR 1

4. The project shall assist non-Annex I Parties in achieving sustainable development and shall have obtained confirmation by the host country thereof.

Kyoto Protocol Art. 12.2, CDM Modalities and Procedures §40a

OK

5. In case public funding from Parties included in Annex I is used for the project activity, these Parties shall provide an affirmation that such funding does not result in a diversion of official development assistance and is separate from and is not counted towards the financial obligations of these Parties.

Decision 17/CP.7, CDM Modalities and Procedures Appendix B, § 2

OK

6. Parties participating in the CDM shall designate a national authority for the CDM. CDM Modalities and Procedures §29

OK

7. The host Party and the participating Annex I Party shall be a Party to the Kyoto Protocol.

CDM Modalities §30/31a OK

8. The participating Annex I Party’s assigned amount shall have been calculated and recorded.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §31b

OK

9. The participating Annex I Party shall have in place a national system for CDM Modalities and OK



Requirement Reference Conclusion estimating GHG emissions and a national registry in accordance with Kyoto Protocol Article 5 and 7.

Procedures §31b

About additionality

10. Reduction in GHG emissions shall be additional to any that would occur in the absence of the project activity, i.e. a CDM project activity is additional if anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity.

Kyoto Protocol Art. 12.5c, CDM Modalities and Procedures §43

OK

CAR 2

About forecast emission reductions and environmental impacts

11. The emission reductions shall be real, measurable and give long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change.

Kyoto Protocol Art. 12.5b OK

For large-scale projects only

12. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts, shall be submitted, and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the Host Party, an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the Host Party shall be carried out.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §37c

OK

About stakeholder involvement

13. Comments by local stakeholders shall be invited, a summary of these provided and how due account was taken of any comments received.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §37b

OK

14. Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited NGOs shall have been invited to comment on the validation requirements for minimum 30 days, and the project design document and comments have been made publicly available.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §40

The PDD of the 29.7 MW Wind Power

Project in Karnataka, India was made

publicly available on www.dnv.com/certifica



Requirement Reference Conclusion tion/climatechange and Parties, stakeholders

and NGOs were through the CDM website invited to provide comments

during the period from 09 Sep 2007 to 08 Oct

2007.

OK

Other

15. The baseline and monitoring methodology shall be previously approved by the CDM Executive Board.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §37e

OK

16. A baseline shall be established on a project-specific basis, in a transparent manner and taking into account relevant national and/or sectoral policies and circumstances.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §45c,d

OK

17. The baseline methodology shall exclude to earn CERs for decreases in activity levels outside the project activity or due to force majeure.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §47

OK

18. The project design document shall be in conformance with the UNFCCC CDM-PDD format.

CDM Modalities and Procedures Appendix B, EB Decision

OK

19. Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting shall be in accordance with the modalities described in the Marrakech Accords and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP.

CDM Modalities and Procedures §37f

OK

CL 2


* MoV = Means of Verification, DR= Document Review, I= Interview CDM Validation 2007-1094, rev. 01 A-4

Table 2 Requirements Checklist

CHECKLIST QUESTION Ref. MoV* COMMENTS Draft Concl.

Final Concl.

A. General Description of Project Activity The project design is assessed.

A.1. Project Boundaries Project Boundaries are the limits and borders defining the GHG emission reduction project.

A.1.1. Are the project’s spatial boundaries (geographical) clearly defined?

PDD DR Yes. The project activity involves installation of WEGs at Anabaru and Arasinagundi Villages, Jagalur Taluk, Davangere district, Karnataka, India.

OK

A.1.2. Are the project’s system boundaries (components and facilities used to mitigate GHGs) clearly defined?

PDD DR The spatial extent of the project boundary includes the project site and all power plants connected physically to the Southern Grid.

OK

A.2. Participation Requirements Referring to Part A, Annex 1 and 2 of the PDD as well as the CDM glossary with respect to the terms Party, Letter of Approval, Authorization and Project Participant.

A.2.1. Which Parties and project participants are participating in the project?

PDD DR India (Host Party) & Accion wind Energy Pvt Ltd is the project participant.

OK CAR 1

OK

A.2.2. Have all involved Parties provided a valid and complete letter of approval and have all private/public project participants been authorized by an involved Party?

PDD DR The LoA from the Govt of India has not been obtained.

OK CAR 1

OK




Final Concl.

A.2.3. Do all participating Parties fulfil the participation requirements as follows:

- Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol

- Voluntary participation

- Designated a National Authority

PDD DR India :

The Designated National Authority of India is Ministry of Environmental and Forests.

India ratified the Kyoto Protocol on 22 August 2002.

Annex 1 Party: To be identified.

OK CAR 1

OK

A.2.4. Potential public funding for the project from Parties in Annex I shall not be a diversion of official development assistance.

PDD DR/I The validation did not reveal any information on the diversion of ODA funds for the project activity.

OK

A.3. Technology to be employed Validation of project technology focuses on the project engineering, choice of technology and competence/ maintenance needs. The validator should ensure that environmentally safe and sound technology and know-how is used.

A.3.1. Does the project design engineering reflect current good practices?

PDD DR/I Yes. The technology employed in the project reflects current good practice.

OK

A.3.2. Does the project use state of the art technology or would the technology result in a significantly better performance than any commonly used technologies in the host country?

PDD DR/I The project technology is available in India. OK




Final Concl.

a. Does the project make provisions for meeting training and maintenance needs?

PDD DR/I Yes, the project will require trained and qualified manpower. The procedures for training and the maintenance would be devised when the plant becomes operational.

OK

A.4. Contribution to Sustainable Development The project’s contribution to sustainable development is assessed.

A.4.1. Has the host country confirmed that the project assists it in achieving sustainable development?

PDD DR The project proponent has not received the host Party’s letter of approval (LoA),

CAR 1 OK

A.4.2. Will the project create other environmental or social benefits than GHG emission reductions?

PDD DR/I Yes. The project activity will create employment opportunities in the area.

OK

B. Project Baseline The validation of the project baseline establishes whether the selected baseline methodology is appropriate and whether the selected baseline represents a likely baseline scenario.

B.1. Baseline Methodology It is assessed whether the project applies an appropriate baseline methodology.

B.1.1. Does the project apply an approved methodology and the correct version thereof?

PDD DR Yes. The project applies ACM 0002 Version 6.

OK

B.1.2. Are the applicability criteria in the baseline methodology all fulfilled?

PDD DR Yes. OK

B.2. Baseline Scenario Determination




Final Concl.

The choice of the baseline scenario will be validated with focus on whether the baseline is a likely scenario, and whether the methodology to define the baseline scenario has been followed in a complete and transparent manner.

B.2.1. What is the baseline scenario?

PDD DR Electricity delivered to the grid by the project that would have otherwise been generated by the operation of grid-connected power plants and by the addition of new generation sources within the Southern Regional grid.

OK

B.2.2. What other alternative scenarios have been considered and why is the selected scenario the most likely one?

PDD DR Three alternatives have been identified. a. Implementation of the project activity not undertaken as a CDM project activity b. Implementation of a similar scale fossil fuel (diesel) based power plant c. Continuation of the current situation with no project activity.

OK

B.2.3. Has the baseline scenario been determined according to the methodology?

PDD DR Yes. The baseline scenario has been determined according to the methodology.

OK

B.2.4. Has the baseline scenario been determined using conservative assumptions where possible?

PDD DR Yes. OK

B.2.5. Does the baseline scenario sufficiently take into account relevant national and/or sectoral policies, macro-economic trends and political aspirations?

PDD DR Yes. OK

B.2.6. Is the baseline scenario determination compatible PDD DR Yes. OK




Final Concl.

with the available data and are all literature and sources clearly referenced?

B.3. Additionality Determination

The assessment of additionality will be validated with focus on whether the project itself is not a likely baseline scenario.

B.3.1. Is the project additionality assessed according to the methodology?

PDD DR Yes, The project additionality has been assessed as per the Methodology.

OK

B.3.2. Are all assumptions stated in a transparent and conservative manner?

PDD DR/I The project activity uses Investment analysis and Barrier analysis (Technological barriers and Investment Barriers) to demonstrate additionality. However there is a lack of clarity in the following:

Investment analysis: a. Equity IRR has been used instead of

the Project IRR for the benchmark analysis.

b. It is not clear whether all the relevant data/assumptions like PLF, tariff, interest rates, investment costs used are prior to Board Approval.

c. As part of sensitivity analysis , the basis of the indicators and their range lack elaboration.

Barrier analysis:

CAR 2 OK




Final Concl.

a. The argument under investment barrier mentioning that the project activity is the first IPP based on non recource financing needs further elaboration and supporting evidences.

b. The arguments under Technological barriers mentioning that the project activity is first of its kind in using underground cabling and covered transformers needs to be substantiated with references.

B.3.3. Is sufficient evidence provided to support the relevance of the arguments made?

PDD DR/I Refer to comments above. CAR 2 OK

B.3.4. If the starting date of the project activity is before the date of validation, has sufficient evidence been provided that the incentive from the CDM was seriously considered in the decision to proceed with the project activity?

PDD DR/I The starting date of the project activity lacks clarity and as the starting date is earlier than the date of validation documents for demonstrating that CDM was considered at the stage of conceiving the project shall be provided

CL 1 OK

B.4. Calculation of GHG Emission Reductions – Project emissions

It is assessed whether the project emissions are stated according to the methodology and whether the argumentation for the choice of default factors and values – where applicable – is justified.

B.4.1. Are the calculations documented according to the PDD DR Since the project is a Wind power project, no OK




Final Concl.

approved methodology and in a complete and transparent manner?

project emissions are envisaged.

B.5. Calculation of GHG Emission Reductions – Baseline emissions

It is assessed whether the baseline emissions are stated according to the methodology and whether the argumentation for the choice of default factors and values – where applicable – is justified.

B.5.1. Are the calculations documented according to the approved methodology and in a complete and transparent manner?

PDD DR Yes. The baseline calculations have been done as per the approved methodology ACM 002 version 6.

OK

B.5.2. Have conservative assumptions been used when calculating the baseline emissions?

PDD DR/I Yes. OK

B.5.3. Are uncertainties in the baseline emission estimates properly addressed?

PDD DR/I The baseline emissions have been calculated using the details provided by CEA.

OK

B.6. Calculation of GHG Emission Reductions – Leakage

It is assessed whether leakage emissions are stated according to the methodology and whether the argumentation for the choice of default factors and values – where applicable – is justified.

B.6.1. Are the leakage calculations documented according to the approved methodology and in a complete and transparent manner?

PDD DR Since the project activity is a wind power project, no leakage is associated with the project activity.

OK




Final Concl.

B.7. Emission Reductions

The emission reductions shall be real, measurable and give long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change.

B.7.1. Are the emission reductions real, measurable and give long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change.

PDD DR Yes. The project activity will result in fewer emission reductions than the baseline scenario.

OK

B.8. Monitoring Methodology It is assessed whether the project applies an appropriate monitoring methodology.

B.8.1. Is the monitoring plan documented according to the approved methodology and in a complete and transparent manner?

PDD DR/I Yes. The monitoring plan has been devised as per the Monitoring methodology adopted for the project activity.

OK

B.8.2. Will all monitored data required for verification and issuance be kept for two years after the end of the crediting period or the last issuance of CERs, for this project activity, whichever occurs later?

PDD DR/I Yes. The Data will be archived till two years after the end of the crediting period.

OK

B.9. Monitoring of Project Emissions It is established whether the monitoring plan provides for reliable and complete project emission data over time.

B.9.1. Does the monitoring plan provide for the collection and archiving of all relevant data necessary for estimation or measuring the

PDD DR Since the project is a Wind power project, no project emissions are envisaged.

OK




Final Concl.

greenhouse gas emissions within the project boundary during the crediting period?

B.10. Monitoring of Baseline Emissions

It is established whether the monitoring plan provides for reliable and complete baseline emission data over time.

B.10.1. Does the monitoring plan provide for the collection and archiving of all relevant data necessary for determining baseline emissions during the crediting period?

PDD DR Yes. The project uses the ex-ante determination of emission factor for southern grid of India. Only net electricity supplied to the grid will be monitored and double checked with the electricity sales receipts. However the monitoring plan mentions about monitoring of the net electricity supplied to the grid without clearly indicating whether the monitoring of export and import of electricity is being done.

CL 2

B.10.2. Are the choices of baseline GHG indicators reasonable and conservative?

PDD DR Yes. The baseline indicators chosen are in accordance to ACM 0002.

OK

B.10.3. Is the measurement method clearly stated for each baseline indicator to be monitored and also deemed appropriate?

PDD DR/I Measurement methods are specified in the Monitoring Plan, B.7 in the PDD.

OK

B.10.4. Is the measurement equipment described and deemed appropriate?

PDD DR/I Yes. The meters are supplied by KPTCL. OK

B.10.5. Is the measurement accuracy addressed and PDD DR/I Monitoring data will be checked for OK




Final Concl.

deemed appropriate? Are procedures in place on how to deal with erroneous measurements?

consistency. Provisions have been made in the Monitoring plan to cross check the readings.

B.10.6. Is the measurement interval for baseline data identified and deemed appropriate?

PDD DR/I Yes. OK

B.10.7. Is the registration, monitoring, measurement and reporting procedure defined?

PDD DR/I General descriptions of these procedures are shown in Section B.7.2 of the PDD.

OK

B.10.8. Are procedures identified for maintenance of monitoring equipment and installations? Are the calibration intervals being observed?

PDD DR/I The project activity has envisaged calibration of meters according to the intervals specified by CEG and KPTCL.

OK

B.10.9. Are procedures identified for day-to-day records handling (including what records to keep, storage area of records and how to process performance documentation)

PDD DR/I Yes. OK

B.11. Monitoring of Leakage It is assessed whether the monitoring plan provides for reliable and complete leakage data over time.

B.11.1. Does the monitoring plan provide for the collection and archiving of all relevant data necessary for determining leakage?

PDD DR Since the project activity is a wind power project no leakage is envisaged.

OK

B.12. Monitoring of Sustainable Development Indicators/ Environmental Impacts

It is assessed whether choices of indicators are reasonable




Final Concl.

and complete to monitor sustainable performance over time.

B.12.1. Is the monitoring of sustainable development indicators/ environmental impacts warranted by legislation in the host country?

PDD DR Indian DNA does not require any collection and archiving of data related to Sustainable development indicators. However LOA from govt of India has not been obtained.

CAR 1 OK

B.13. Project Management Planning It is checked that project implementation is properly prepared for and that critical arrangements are addressed.

B.13.1. Is the authority and responsibility of overall project management clearly described?

PDD DR/I The authority and responsibility of overall project management has not been formalised.

CL 3

OK

B.13.2. Are procedures identified for training of monitoring personnel?

PDD DR/I The procedures for training of the operating personnel to be formalised.

CL 3 OK

B.13.3. Are procedures identified for emergency preparedness for cases where emergencies can cause unintended emissions?

PDD DR/I No emergencies are foreseen OK

B.13.4. Are procedures identified for review of reported results/data?

PDD DR/I Procedures for internal review needs to be formalised.

CL 3 OK

B.13.5. Are procedures identified for corrective actions in order to provide for more accurate future monitoring and reporting?

PDD DR/I Procedures for corrective actions needs to be formalised.

CL 3 OK




Final Concl.

C. Duration of the Project/ Crediting Period It is assessed whether the temporary boundaries of the project are clearly defined.

C.1.1. Are the project’s starting date and operational lifetime clearly defined and evidenced?

PDD DR/I The Starting date of the project activity needs to be clarified.

CL 1 OK

C.1.2. Is the start of the crediting period clearly defined and reasonable?

PDD DR/I A fixed crediting period of Ten has been chosen and the starting date of the crediting period is expected to be from the date of registration of the project.

OK

D. Environmental Impacts Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts will be assessed, and if deemed significant, an EIA should be provided to the validator.

D.1.1. Has an analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity been sufficiently described?

PDD DR/I Yes. The project participant has highlighted the impacts due to the project activity in the PDD.

OK

D.1.2. Are there any Host Party requirements for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and if yes, is an EIA approved?

PDD DR/I The proposed project activity does not fall under the list of categories listed by Govt of India and hence EIA is not required.

OK

D.1.3. Will the project create any adverse environmental effects?

PDD DR/I The project is not expected to create adverse environmental effects.

OK

D.1.4. Are transboundary environmental impacts considered in the analysis?

PDD DR/I There are no adverse transboundary environmental impacts

OK




Final Concl.

D.1.5. Have identified environmental impacts been addressed in the project design?

PDD DR/I Yes. The project participant has highlighted the impacts due to the project activity in the PDD.

OK

D.1.6. Does the project comply with environmental legislation in the host country?

PDD DR/I The following documents on statutory clearances are to be provided

a. Power Purchase agreements between the project participant and KPTCL.

b. Land lease documents for Anabaru farm.

CL 4 OK

E. Stakeholder Comments The validator should ensure that stakeholder comments have been invited with appropriate media and that due account has been taken of any comments received.

E.1.1. Have relevant stakeholders been consulted?

PDD DR/I Local stakeholders were invited to comment on the project during a stakeholder consultation meeting held on 03 August 2007

OK

E.1.2. Have appropriate media been used to invite comments by local stakeholders?

PDD DR/I An announcement was made in the local newspaper on 28 July 2007 to invite local stakeholders to comment on the project.

OK

E.1.3. If a stakeholder consultation process is required by regulations/laws in the host country, has the stakeholder consultation process been carried out in accordance with such regulations/laws?

PDD DR Govt of India legislations does not require any local stakeholder consultations.

OK

E.1.4. Is a summary of the stakeholder comments received provided?

PDD DR/I Yes. It is incorporated into Section E.2 of the PDD

OK




Final Concl.

E.1.5. Has due account been taken of any stakeholder comments received?

PDD DR/I No adverse comment has been received during the consultation process.

OK



Table 3 Resolution of Corrective Action and Clarification Requests Draft report clarifications and corrective action requests by validation team


Summary of project owner response Validation team conclusion

CAR.1 Host Country approval has not been obtained.

A.2.1.- A.2.3

Host Country approval meeting was held on 22nd October 2007. Requisite clarifications have been provided and approval is awaited.

Accepted. Letter of Approval evidenced. CAR Closed.

CAR 2 The project activity uses Investment analysis and Barrier analysis (Technological barriers and Investment Barriers) to demonstrate additionality. However there is a lack of clarity in the following:

Investment analysis: a. Equity IRR has been used instead of

the Project IRR for the benchmark analysis.

b. It is not clear whether all the relevant data/assumptions like PLF, tariff, interest rates, investment costs used are prior to Board Approval.

c. As part of sensitivity analysis , the basis of the indicators and their range lack elaboration.

Barrier analysis: a. The argument under investment barrier mentioning that the project activity is the first IPP based on non recource financing needs further elaboration and supporting

B.3.2 –B.3.3 Investment analysis:

a. Project IRR was the key criteria considered during investment and has now been incorporated in the Investment analysis. Please refer Section B.5 a) All relevant data used are prior to

Board approval b) The basis for the indicators and their

range is described in section B.5 Sub-step 2d

Barrier analysis: a) AWEPL has the supporting

evidences from the lenders that supports that the project activity is amongst the first IPP based on non recource financing, in Karnataka.

Accepted based on the supporting documents presented and the revised PDD submitted. CAR Closed.



Draft report clarifications and corrective action requests by validation team



evidences.

b. The arguments under Technological barriers mentioning that the project activity is first of its kind in using underground cabling and covered transformers needs to be substantiated with references.

The argument has been strengthened in Sections A.4.3 and B.5 sub-step 3a. and the same has been confirmed by Vestas

CL 1. The starting date of the project activity lacks clarity and as the starting date is earlier than the date of validation documents for demonstrating that CDM was considered at the stage of conceiving the project shall be provided

B.3.4, C.1.1 The starting date of the project activity has been corrected and documents for demonstrating that CDM was considered at the stage of conceiving the project will be provided to the validator

Accepted. Evidences of project start date and CDM consideration are received and assessed and found appropriate. CL Closed.

CL 2: The monitoring plan mentions about monitoring of the net electricity supplied to the grid without clearly indicating whether the monitoring of export and import of electricity is being done.

B.10.2 The monitoring plan has been elaborated to clearly indicate the monitoring of export and import of electricity. Please refer Section B.7.1 and Annex 4.

Accepted. The PDD is revised. CL Closed.

CL 3: The authority and responsibility of overall project management has not been formalised The procedures for training of the operating personnel; internal review; corrective and

B.13.1,2,4,5 A CDM Manual will be drafted which spells out the authority and responsibility of overall project management and procedures for training of the operating personnel; internal

Accepted. The CL is closed.






preventive actions needs to be formalised

review, corrective and preventive actions.

CL 4: The following documents on statutory clearances are to be provided

a. Power Purchase agreements between the project participant and KPTCL.

b. Land lease documents for Anabaru farm.

D.1.6 The assignment of Arasinagundi and Anabaru has already happened to BESCOM by the State Power Procurement Committee. PPA follows assignment and will be forwarded to the validator after signature. Land lease transfer to AWEPL is initiated and underway.

PPA for both the locations are not yet in place at validation stage. This therefore needs to be checked during the first periodic verification. The Land lease approvals have been received and assessed by DNV. The CL is closed.

CL 5: The recent incentives from the MNES( Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources) that wind projects which do not avail accelerated depreciation are eligible for a incentive of Rs.0.5 /kWh needs to be discussed.

- We specifically refer to the possibility of availing this benefit for Arasinagundi (Phase I) and Anabaru (Phase II) projects referred in the PDD as requested by you and list the many uncertainties below. Kindly bear in mind that this incentive did not exist at the time the decision to go ahead with the project was made. It has come in almost 14 months after beginning the project activity. At the point in time it has been announced, the trial phase of Arasinagundi generation is on and Anabaru is in an advanced stage of construction with commissioning expected in Aug-08. The uncertainties with regard this

The guideline on this incentive has come only very recently (June 30, 2008) and it is demonstrated that the incentive was not available at the time of decision making. Moreover, this incentive can be considered a national and/or sectoral policies that gives comparative advantages to less emissions-intensive technologies over more emissions-intensive technologies which was adopted after decision 17/CP.7 (11 November 2001) and thus does not need to be taken into account in developing a baseline scenario in accordance with the guidance given by the EB at its 22nd meeting. This CL is closed.






incentive for projects, and especially Arasinagundi and Anabaru at present in our view are as follows: 1) Arasinagundi (13.20 MW) Phase I is not eligible as per clause 2.3 in Annexure I because it is already synchronized with the grid; 2) There is no certainty for Anabaru (16.5 MW) Phase II being eligible as there are many conditions stipulated for compliance and it cannot be ascertained that we will be able to register our request under this scheme prior to the 49MW overall capacity being exhausted, e.g. - obtaining C-WET site validation; - concluding term loans; - DPR and other documentation. 3) There is no certainty that this cap of 49MW for all wind projects in India will be enhanced by MNRE on its being exhausted. This may very well be exhausted before any approach can be made by us; 4) Since there is no disbursement, we are unsure of the timeframe and implementation of the scheme.






Irrespective of the uncertainty of the incentive, we firmly believe that our eligibility for being a CDM project should not be questioned due to subsequent developments like the incentive that were unpredictable when the decision to invest in this project was made, and also totally beyond our control such that this could never be considered. The construction and investment is not only committed but largely done by this time. The situation will be irreversible for us even if there any negative subsequent development. The basis of proceeding with the investment is clearly explained in the PDD.”

DET NORSKE VERITAS


APPENDIX B

CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCE

CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCE


Mari Grooss Viddal Qualification in accordance with DNV’s Qualification scheme for CDM/JI (ICP-9-8-i1-CDMJI-i1

GHG Auditor: Yes

CDM Validator: Yes JI Validator: --

CDM Verifier: -- JI Verifier: --

Industry Sector Expert for Sectoral Scope(s): --

Technical Reviewer for (group of) methodologies:

ACM0001, AM0002, AM0003, AM0010, AM0011, AM0012, AMS-III.G

Yes

ACM002, AMS-I.A-D, AM0019, AM0026, AM0029, AM0045

Yes

Høvik, 26 September 2007

Michael Lehmann Technical Director, International Climate Change Services



Ramesh Ramachandran Qualification in accordance with DNV’s Qualification scheme for CDM/JI (ICP-9-8-i1-CDMJI-i1

GHG Auditor: Yes


CDM Verifier: Yes JI Verifier: --

Industry Sector Expert for Sectoral Scope(s): Sectoral scope 4, 5, 13



Yes

Høvik, 22 December 2006

Einar Telnes Michael Lehmann Director, International Climate Change Servicer Technical Director



Raman Venkata Kakaraparthi Qualification in accordance with DNV’s Qualification scheme for CDM/JI (ICP-9-8-i1-CDMJI-i1

GHG Auditor: Yes


CDM Verifier: Yes JI Verifier: --

Industry Sector Expert for Sectoral Scope(s): Sectoral scope 5



Yes

Høvik, 30 October 2007

Michael Lehmann Technical Director, International Climate Change Services



Murali Govidarajulu Qualification in accordance with DNV’s Qualification scheme for CDM/JI (ICP-9-8-i1-CDMJI-i1

GHG Auditor: Yes

CDM Validator: -- JI Validator: --

CDM Verifier: -- JI Verifier: --

Industry Sector Expert for Sectoral Scope(s): --

Høvik, 6 November 2006

Einar Telnes Michael Lehmann Director, International Climate Change Services Technical Director

Vestas Wind Technology India Pvt Ltd

Jagalur Site

Environment Management Program – Jagalur Site

Ever since the inception of Jagalur Acciona project, Environment

management has been a key area on which a constant eye has been

kept. With a continued scope and support of the Customer, several

activities were taken up which proves our serious concern towards it.

Lot of plantation activities had been carried out in order to increase the

green density of forest. Various other civil maintenance activities were

also incorporated which were quite important to preserve and cultivate

Mother Nature’s green resource-forest.

To be quite specific, the below mentioned activities are done till date

which will further focus on areas of concern.

Gully checks were done at 21 different places which calculate for

320 Cubic meters at Anaburu site.

850 no’s of various medicinal plants like Neem, Amla, Bio Diesel

and Hongai were planted with incorporation of customer and

forest department at both the sites before monsoon season.

85000 Cactus plantations were done on the edges of site roads

and barren forest lands in order to arrest the soil erosion at both

Arasinagundi and Anaburu sites.

To avoid large amounts of soil erosion, we have identified 18

spots for carrying out stone pitching work, out of which 12 have

already been completed and the rest are in progress.

Drain trenches were periodically cleared and Hume pipes were

appropriately fixed at places where a large amount of water is

flowing.


Jagalur Site

Planned to carry out the fire line works all around the forest in

order to avoid forest fires. These fire lines prevent the spreading

of fire and constrict it to a very small area.

Constant training is being imparted to all employees including

subcontractors on awareness and importance of environmental

features like

1. Flora / Fauna spotting

2. Bird strikes, waste disposal, avoiding tree cutting activities

etc.

3. Information relevant to these areas is to be reported

properly and is considered as mandatory act.

With all these above points we would be in a position to consider

ourselves as a team with vision of conserving and cultivating the

resources of our precious nature.

Gully Check Works:


Jagalur Site

Stone Pitching Works:

Hume Pipe Works:


Jagalur Site

Waste Disposal at Jagalur a glance:

The following wastes are usually released from the wind turbines during

various maintenance and site activities. Procedure for collection and disposal

of these wastes are furnished herewith.

Oil cotton wastes

Waste oil

Empty grease/ Spray containers and

Metal wastes.

Other landfills

The collected wastes from the turbine are being segregated appropriately in

the designated containers provided at site for these purpose. Separate

vehicle would be hired to dispose the waste to the appropriate agencies on

bimonthly/monthly basis depending upon the quantity.

Oil cotton wastes and landfills will be disposed in the local Panchayat garbage

yard. Being a Government agency the disposal/ Storage of these wastes will

be taken care by them. Proper Delivery challan and receipts along with the

nature of the waste and Quantity will be mentioned by them every time we

dispose it.

Since the quantity of the waste oil would be less as only 18 machines are

situated at Jagalur. Hence the released oil will be centrally stored at

Chitradurga and the same will be disposed off through the authorized agency

within 90 days of collection to company authorized vendors.

Empty grease/Spray containers and metal wastes will be rammed to release

the stored residues and will be disposed along with the metal wastes

periodically.

Copy of a recent document pertaining to disposal enclosed herewith.


Jagalur Site


Jagalur Site

List of the Units Registered with MoEF/CPCB as Recycleres/Reprocessors having Environmentally Sound Management

Facilities

USED/WASTE OIL RE-PROCESSORS

Total No. of units granted Registration is "183"

Web Page updated on: 18th September, 2009

S. No. Name of the unit Waste permitted and

Quantity allowed

Registration Valid upto (DD-MM-YYYY)

ANDHRA PRADESH

1. M/s Tanu Petrochem Products Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 238, Phase-II, Pashamyalaram,IDA, Medak Dist. Andhra Pradesh email : :[email protected]

Waste Oil

- 18000 KLA ------------------ Used Oil

- 14400 KLA

No expiry date Validity as per the Terms & Conditions specified in the registration certificate

2. M/s Zen Lubes, Plot No. 62, IDA, E-Block, Autonagar, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh- 530 046

Used Oil Only

- 720 KLA


3.

M/s Shri Durga Bhawani Oil Traders,

Shed No. PD-12, Phase-III, Vijaywada-520 007, Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil

- 270 KLA

10/09/2009

4. M/s Jyothi Lubricants,

Plot No. 186-B, I.D.A. Kondapalli, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna Dist. Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil

- 360 KLA

10/09/2009

mailto::[email protected]�









http://www.cpcb.nic.in/terms&conditions.htm�


http://www.cpcb.nic.in/terms&conditions-WASTEOIL.htm�














5. M/s K. V. R. Oils Plot No. 57, G, IDA Kondapally Ibrahimpatam (M), Krishna Dist. Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil

- 360 KLA

20/11/2009

6. M/s Supreme Lubricants (P) Ltd.,

Plot No. 45, IDA Medchal, R. R. Dist. Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh – 501 401

Used Oil

- 9600 KLA ____________ Waste Oil

- 12000 KLA

14/01/2010

7. M/s Lucky Oil Company Plot no. 33/A, IDA Mankhal Maheshwaram (M), Rangareddy Dist. Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil

- 14600 KLA ____________ Waste Oil

- 14600 KLA

14/01/2010

8. M/s Yenrol Lubex Private Limited Plot No. 145, I.D.A. Mallapur Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh – 500076

Used Oil Only

- 4500 KLA


9. M/s Sri Srinivasaa Lubricants Plot No. E-4 & E-5, Industrial Estate, Mydukur Road, Proddatur, Kadappa District, Andhra Pradesh-516360

Used Oil Only

- 720 KLA

06/05/2010

10. M/s Mistry Petroleum Products, Plot No. 146 & 147, IDA, Phase-II, Pashamailaram, Patancheru Mandal, Medak Distirict, (AP) Email : [email protected]

Used Oil only

- 2880 KLA ------------------ Waste Oil only

- 720 KLA

12/05/2010



































11. M/s Sri Saiganga Lubricants, Plot No. 13/3, Shed No. -4, IDA Kothur, District Mahboobnagar, Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil Only

- 900 KLA

12/05/2010

12. M/s Siddhartha Lubricants Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 6A A.I.E. Pedagantyada, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530044

Used Oil only

- 1500 KLA


13. M/s New Kwality Petrochemicals, A-3, Industrial Estate, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh-523 002

Used Oil only

- 3600 KLA

17/12/2013

14. M/s Virani Company Sy.No.849, Industrial Estate Medchal, Ranga Reddy District Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil only

- 3000 KLA


15. M/s GEM Lubricants Plot No.54-A, Kondapally Krishna District Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil only

- 1440 KLA


16. M/s Mahalakshmi Industries Tempally Village Gannavaram Mandal Krishna District Andhra Pradesh

Used Oil only

- 2420 KLA


17. M/s Sri Venkateshwara Lubricants Plot No.70, ‘E’ Block Autonagar, Vishakapatnam Andhra Pradesh – 530 012

Used Oil only

- 360 KLA


mailto:[email protected]�


























18. M/s Konark Petrochemicals Plot No.221, Plot No.10, 6th Cross Road Autonagar, Vijayawada Krishna Distt. Andhara Pradesh-520 007

Used Oil only

- 300 KLA


19. M/s Lakshmi Lubs Plot No.11, Shed No.8 Mini Industrial Complex,Autonagar Vijawada Andhra Pradesh-520 007

Used Oil only

- 300 KLA


ASSAM

1. M/s Modern Lube Industires, A.K. Azad Road , Barsha Para Industrial Area, Guwahati – 781 034 Assam

Used Oil - 1000 KLA

15/01/2010

2. M/s Progressive Industires, Rani Industrial Area, P.O. Rani-781131, Distt. Kamrup Assam E-mail : [email protected] [email protected]

Waste Oil - 1000 KLA ------------------ Used Oil - 500 KLA


3. M/s Allied Industries Digboi Road PO – Makum Junction Distt.Tinsukia-786 170 Assam

Waste Oil - 720 KLA


4. M/s East End Petro Chemicals (P)Ltd. PO-Naoholia Dibrugarh-786 191 Assam

Used Oil - 600 KLA

















BIHAR

1. M/s Essell Lubricants & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Eyari Road, Farm, Aurangabad-824 101 Bihar

Used Oil

- 1155 KLA ____________ Waste oil

- 2310 KLA

15-06-2010 __________________ 15/06/2010

2. M/s Srishti Lube (India)Ltd. NH-28, Bagraha-Deeh Barauni Begusarai Bihar

Used Oil

- 2400 KLA

02/06/2014

CHHATTISGARH

1. M/s Supreme Petro-Synth Specialities, 15-B, Heavy Industrial Area, Hathkhoj, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh- 490 026 E-Mail :- [email protected] mailto:[email protected]

Used Oil - 4500 KLA

____________

Waste Oil

- 4500 KLA


07/09/2010

2. M/s K.K. Lubes Private Limited Plot No. 4,(Part) Sector B Industrial Area, Sirgiti, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur Chattisgarah

Used Oil

- 2000 KLA


3. M/s Gracious Allied & Coatings Pvt.Ltd. Village – Kasturi, P.O.Nagarnar The.Jagadalpur,Distt.Bastar Chattisgarh

Waste Oil - 9000 KLA

13/05/2014

http://www.cpcb.nic.in/mail to:[email protected]�


































GOA NIL NIL

GUJARAT

1. M/s Suraj Barrel Supply Co. Opp. PWD Store, Chandola Talav, Ahmedabad, Gujarat

Used Oil

- 2700 KLA


2. M/s Bombay Barrel Supply Co. Danilimda, Chandola Highway Ahmedabad – 380028 (Gujarat)

Used Oil

- 600 KLA


3. M/s Gujarat Mobile Pvt. Ltd. R. Survery No. 62, Palki, Behind Plot No. 69/A, B, C, Village Mamsa, Ta. Ghogha Dist. Bhavnagar, Gujarat

Used Oil

- 2208 KLA ____________

Waste Oil

- 5160 KLA

No expiry date Validity as per the Terms & Conditions specified in the registration certificate 14/05/2010

4. M/s Fine Refiners Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 40, GIDC, Vartej Dist. Bhavnagar Gujarat

Used Oil

- 2400 KLA ____________

Waste Oil

- 12000 KLA


5. M/s Alicid Oraganic Industries Ltd., 208, Hanumant Henduva, Opp. Gujcomasoi Nr. Kharai River, Highway Post. Palavaasana, Mehsana-2 Gujarat

Used Oil - 3600 KLA ____________



23/09/2010










































6. M/s Western India Petrochem Industries, 62-63, GIDC, Vartej, Dist. Bhavnagar (Gujarat)

Used Oil

- 1800 KLA


7. M/s Jawrawala Petroleum 200/33, B/H, Kashiram Mill, Narol Ahmedabad - 382 405 Gujarat

Used Oil

- 4800 KLA


8. M/s Gujarat Petrochem, Plot No. 48/49/50, GIDC Vartej, Dist. Bhavnagar, Gujarat

Used Oil

– 1800 KLA ____________ Waste Oil

- 7200 KLA


9. M/s Reliance Barrel Supply Co.

200/34, B/h, Kasiram Mill, Narol Ahmedabad Gujarat - 382 405 E-Mail :- [email protected]

Used Oil

– 7200 KLA

____________

Waste Oil

– 7200 KLA


_________________________

13/07/2014

10. M/s Unity Petroleum Co., Panjetani Estate, Opp. PWD Store, Chandola, Ahmedabad-28, Gujarat

Used Oil

- 600 KLA


11. M/s Daman Ganga Paper Mill Pvt. Ltd.

(Oil Recycling Division), Plot No.257-258, Silvassa Road, GIDC, Vapi-396195, Dist-Valsad, Gujarat

Waste Oil

-13000 KLA

17/01/2010













mailto:E-Mail :- [email protected]�














12. M/s Mercury Enterprises,

Plot No. 2106/07, Phase-III, GIDC, Vatva Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

Used Oil

- 480 KLA


13. M/s R.K.Steel,

Plot No.21, GIDC Estate, Phase-1, Narmadanagar, Bharuch-392 015 Gujarat

Used Oil

- 4320 KLA

17/12/2013

14. M/s Kheezer Industries 206/B, Vartej-Budhel Road, Vartej, Bhavnagar-364 060 Gujarat

Used Oil

- 8550 KLA


15. M/s N.K.Lubricants Pvt.Ltd. Block No.741/A Village – Vasna Buzarg Ta:Kheda, Distt.Kheda-387 560 Gujarat

Used Oil

- 2400 KLA

03/09/2009

16. M/s Jai Ambe Thinchem Plot No.C-1/B-2010 Phase – IV, GIDC Vapi – 396 195 Gujarat

Waste Oil

- 3000 KLA


HARYANA

1. M/s Bharat Oil & Grease Company

C-4/15, MIE, Bhadurgarh, Jhajjar Haryana

Used Oil

- 2880 KLA


2. M/s Universal Lubricants & Speciality Products

Village - Danialpur, Kunjpura Road, Dist. Karnal

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA

























Haryana

3. M/s Haryana Industrial Oils Co. Pct. Ltd. Najafgarh Road, Industrial Area Bahadurgarh-124 507 Haryana E-Mail :- [email protected]

Used Oil

- 3750 KLA


4. M/s Satyam Petro Chemical, Plot No. 5, Sector – 4, Industrial Area, Faridabad Haryana

Used Oil

- 360 KLA

14/10/2009

5. M/s Lubri Sales (India) 32, Industrial Development Colony, Mehrauli Road, Gurgaon - 122001 Haryana

Used Oil

- 6000 KLA


6. M/S Shiv Refinery Vill. Newel, Kunjpura Road Karnal - 132 001 Haryana

Used Oil

-1000 KLA

09/03/2010

7. M/S Tin Sukhia Petrochemicals (India) 1228, Rai Industrial Estate Rai, Sonepat-131029 Haryana

Used Oil

-9000 KLA

25/05/2010

8. M/s Sumit Chemicals, Plot No. 60, IDC, Hissar Road,Rohtak, Haryana

Used Oil

- 5000 KLA

31/08/2010

9. M/s National Chemicals 9 KM Stone, Barwala Road Vill. Talwandi Rana Tehsil & District Hissar Haryana

Used Oil

- 2700 KLA

31/08/2010































10.

M/s Shiv Oil Refinery,

Kharkhoda Road, Kheri Sampla, Distt. Rohtak, Haryana

Used Oil

- 4800 KLA

13/10/2013

11. M/s Mahavira Udyog 5/11,Mile Stone, Bhiwani Road, Village – Banyani, Rohtak Haryana

Used Oil

- 5000 KLA

16/12/2013

12. M/s Satyam Petro Chemical, Plot No. 5, Sector – 4, Industrial Area, Faridabad Haryana

Used Oil

- 1500 KLA

26/09/2009

13. M/s Shruti Petrochem Industries 41/10/1-8, Village-Lohar Heri The. Bahadurgarh Distt.Jhajjar Haryana

Used Oil

- 5000 KLA

04/05/2014

14. M/s G.S Bharat Refinery 351, M.I.E, Bahadurgarh – 124 507 Haryana

Used Oil

- 3000 KLA

10/05/2014

15. M/s Kuwait Oil Processors Khasra No.89 Delhi-Rohtak Road Sampla, Distt.Rohtak Haryana

Waste Oil

- 4800 KLA


16. M/s Raghav Enterprises Plot No.1379 & 1350 M.I.E, Part-B, Bahadurgarh Distt.Jhajjar Haryana – 124 507

Used Oil

- 6000 KLA

14/06/2014



17. M/s Haryana Petro Oils Plot No.31, Phase-III Industrial Area, Sirsa Haryana

Used Oil

- 1350 KLA

29/07/2014

JHARKHAND

KARNATAKA

1. M/s Lube Tech Petrochemicals

Shed No. C-54, KSSIDC Industrial Estate, Veerasandra, Hosur Road, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District - 560 100, Karnataka, E-mail: [email protected]

Used Oil Only

- 1440 KLA


2. M/s Special Oils S. No. 202/2, Kurvinkopps, Post B, Gudhihal, Taluka: Kalghatagi, Dist. Dharwad, Karnataka E-Mail : [email protected]

Used Oil only

- 1440 KLA


3. M/s Balaji Refineries, B-5&6, Veera Sandra Industrial Estate, Bangalore-562 158, Karnataka

Used Oil

- 1100 KLA


4. M/s Merlyin Hydrocarbons Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 366, KIADB Indl. Growth Centre, Holenarasipura Road, Hussan, Karnataka - 573 201

Waste Oil Only

- 3600 KLA


5. M/s M. R. Industries,

Plot No. 14 G, Ist Cross, 2nd Main, 2nd Phase, Kumalgodu Industrial Area, Kumbalgodu, Bangalore-560 074

Used Oil

- 1000 KLA


6. M/s Arun Industries B-64, 3rd Stage, Peenya Industrial Area,

Used Oil No expiry date Validity as per the Terms &

































Bangalore, Karnataka - 560 058

- 360 KLA

Conditions specified in the registration certificate

7. M/s Nakoda Petrochemical, Plot No.-8, KIADB Industrial Area, Satyamangala, Tumkur. Karnataka - 572104

Used Oil

- 1800 KLA

26/08/2010

8. M/s Century Refineries Pvt. Ltd., # 174 & J, KIADB Industrial Area, Hosakote, Bangalore, Karnataka – 560 058

Used Oil - 10000 KLA ____________ Waste Oil -10000 KLA

26/08/2010

9. M/s Khawja Petroleum Pvt.Ltd. Plot No.3, KIADB Industrial Area, S.G.Kote, Post –Bangarpet Taluk, Kolar Distt. Karnataka-563 114

Used Oil only

-1200 KLA

16/12/2013

10. M/s Shri Shantadurga Petrochemicals 701, Shedegali, Post Manturga, Khanpur Distt. Belgaum Karnataka-591 302

Used Oil only

-1800 KLA


11. M/s Merit India Lubricants 189 KIADB, Bommasandra Jigani Link Road Bangalore-560 105 Karnataka

Used Oil only

- 9000 KLA

31/05/2014

KERALA

















1. M/s Southern Refineries Ltd.,

Kuzhinjanvila, Parassala P.O. Thiruvanthapuram–695 502, Kerala

Used Oil

-13500 KLA ____________ Waste Oil

- 6000 KLA


2. M/s CEE JEE LUBRICANTS VI/592, Indl. Development Area, Edayar, Binanipuram, P.O., Aluva-683502, Kerala

Used Oil

- 3000 KLA ____________ Waste Oil

- 6000 KLA


3. M/s Excel Petrochemicals Koonamthai, Changampuzha Nagar P.O.Kochi Kerala – 682 033

Used Oil only

- 1200 KLA


MADHYA PRADESH

1. M/s Aadi Chem Trade Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 404, Sector-III, Pithampur, Dist Dhar, Madhya Pradesh

Waste Oil

- 4500 KLA

17/12/2013

2. M/s Mangalam Petro Chemicals, Sagar Road, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh

Used Oil - 6000 KLA Waste Oil -1000 KLA

No expiry date Validity as per the Terms & Conditions specified in the registration certificate No expiry date Validity as per the Terms & Conditions specified in the registration certificate

3. M/s Gulmohar Hydro Carbon Pvt. Ltd.,

Plot No. B1, B2 B7 & B8,

Used Oil

- 4500 KLA

No expiry date Validity as per the Terms &






































AKVN Indl. Area, Rangwasarau Distt.Indore-453 331. M.P

E-Mail : [email protected]

____________ Waste Oil

- 30000 KLA

Conditions specified in the registration certificate 31/08/2010

4. M/s Universal Petrochemicals,

Sagar Road. Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA


5. M/s Divya Refineries Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1238, 1239, Vilaage- Jignahat, PO- Lahraura, Dist. Satna, Madhya Pradesh

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA

14/05/2010

6. M/s Shri Agrasen Oil Refinery, Plot No. 3, Sector-III, Pithampure, Distt. Dhar, Madhya Pradesh

Waste Oil

-1200 KLA


7. M/s Kamla Chemicals,

29, Industrial Area Richhai, Jabalpur – 482 010, Madhya Pradesh

Waste Oil - 900 KLA

26/08/2010

8. M/s Mansapuran Petro-Chem Pvt.Ltd., 205-A, New Industrial Area II, Mandideep Raisen, Madhya Pradesh

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA

17/12/2013

9. M/s Bhaskar Lubricants Pvt.Ltd., Industrial Area-Richhai, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh

Used Oil

-3200 KLA



mailto:E-Mail : [email protected]�




























10. M/s Shubhlaxmi Remedies Pvt.Ltd. Village – Sejwaya –Ghatabillod National Highway No.59 Distt.Dhar Madhya Pradesh

Waste Oil

-12000 KLA

04/06/2014

11. M/s Shri Rang Petrochem Industries 51/A, A.K.V.N.Industrial Area Meghnagar-457 779 Distt.Jhabua Madhya Pradesh

Waste Oil

-12000 KLA

13/05/2014

12. M/s Shree Nakoda Industries Plot No.93,Sector-1 Industrial Area, Pithampur Distt.Dhar-454 775 Madhya Pradesh

Used Oil - 900 KLA

13/05/2014

13. M/s Rewa Refinery Private Limited Industrial Estate, P.O.-Waidhan Distt.Singrauli Madhya Pradesh – 486 886

Used Oil - 5000 KLA


MAHARASHTRA

1. M/s Daya Lubricants Pvt. Ltd.

Building No. 11, Waliv Phatta , Prime Industrial Estate, Sativali Road, Village Valiv Phata, Vasai (E) Thane, (D)- 401 208, Maharashtra E-Mail : [email protected]

Used Oil - 3000 KLA ___________ Waste Oil - 14400 KLA


2. M/s North East Lubrica Pvt. Ltd. S. No. 404, Abitghar, Taluka Wada, Dist. Thane - 421 303, Maharashtra

Used Oil

- 9000 KLA

------------------

No expiry date Validity as per the Terms & Conditions specified in the

















Waste Oil

-9000 KLA

registration certificate

3. M/s RHJ Petrochem P. Ltd. Gut. No. 10, Vill. Vardha, Post Uchat, Tal. Wada, Dist. Thane, Maharashtra

Used Oil - 6000 KLA

Waste Oil

- 18000 KLA



4. M/s Naaz Enterprises, Gat. No, 691, Bhupi Phata, Jadhavwadi Haveli, Dist. Pune, Maharashtra

Used Oil

- 800 KLA ----------------- Waste Oil

- 400 KLA


5. M/s Radiant Lubes P. Ltd., Plot No. C-8 & C-9, MIDC Gutibori, Tal. Hingana, Dist. Nagpur, Maharashtra

Used Oil - 5225 KLA ____________Waste Oil - 19740 KLA


21/08/2010

6. M/s Patel Petro Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. H-4, Behind Eurotex Industry, MIDC Gokul Shrigaon, Kolhapur-416234, Maharashtra

Used Oil - 7200 KLA


































7. M/s Vipro Industries, Plot No. D-2/2, MIDC Gokul Sirgaon, Kolhapur-416 234, Maharashtra

Used Oil - 7000 KLA ___________ Waste Oil - 5000 KLA


8. M/s Lucky Petroleum, Plot No. E/11, MIDC, Ghugghus Road, Chandrapur, Maharashtra

Used Oil

- 1200 KLA


9. M/s Deepak & Company, B-20, Road No. 16, Wagle Indl. Estates, Thane, Maharashtra-400 604

Used Oil

- 1800 KLA


10. M/s Meher Petro Chem P. Ltd., Plot No. 17, KPD Indl. Estate, Village: Hamrapur, Manor Wada Road, Dist. Thane, Maharashtra-421 303

Used Oil - 3000 KLA ____________

Waste Oil -12000 KLA


04/09/2009

11. M/s Tax Oil Lubricants Pvt. Ltd.,

R-591, MIDC Industrial Area, Rable, Navi Mumbai – 400 701, Maharashtra

Waste Oil

- 12960 KLA


12. M/s Subhadra Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. F-2, MIDC, Kupwad Block,

Used Oil

- 2500 KLA









































Sangali-416 436, Maharashtra


13. M/s Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., Plot No. 209, Village Khapari, Bhiwandi Wada Road, Tal. Wada, Dist. Thane Maharashtra

Waste Oil

- 15000 KLA


14. M/s Shiva Petro Synth Specialities Ltd., Plot No. 2/3, Shah & Diwan Indl. Area, Opp. BIDCO Studio, Vill Mahim, Palghar Dist. Thane Maharashtra



15. M/s Amol Oils, 92, Ajanta Road, Chincholi, Jalgaon, Maharashra

Waste Oil

- 3600 KLA _____________

Used Oil - 3000 KLA


16. M/s Nova Lubes Pvt. Ltd.,

187/4 Mahurjhiri Village, Katol Road, Distt. Nagpur Maharashtra

Used Oil

- 2160 KLA


17. M/s R.R.Scrap Merchant

203/1, Chikhali-Moshi Road, Chikhali, Tq.Haveli, Distt.Pune-412114 (Maharashtra)

Used Oil

- 350 KLA _____________

Waste Oil

- 1500 KLA


_________________________

12/05/2010

18. M/s Industrial Easters & Chemicals Pvt.Ltd.,

Plot No.A-10,

Used Oil

- 6000 KLA









































M.I.D.C Industrial Area Ambernath,Distt.Thane, Maharashtra

------------------Waste Oil

- 8550 KLA

registration certificate

19. M/s Meghani Enterprises,

H-14, Shaah & Diwan Industrial Complex, Udyognagar Chintupada, Mahim Village, Palghar Dist. Thane Maharashtra

Used Oil

-4500 KLA


20. M/s Sourabh Oils,

E-30-31, MIDC, Ghugus Road, Chandrapur-442406 Maharashtra

Used Oil

-3000 KLA


21. M/s Kapilo Petrochem(P) Ltd.,

T-60, MIDC Nanded, Maharashtra-431603

Used Oil

-3000 KLA

12/05/2010

22. M/s Ishvar Petrochem Pvt. Ltd.,

G.U.T. No. 147/P, Village Sapraonde, P.O., Kudus, Ta-Wada, Dist. Thane-412312, Maharashtra

Used Oil

-650 KLA

12/05/2010

23. M/s Garg Distillaries Pvt. Ltd. Survey No. 26/2, 26/2-A, Village-Asali, Post Bhorkheda, Taluka- Sirpur, Distt.-Dhule, Maharashtra

Used Oil

-6000 KLA

------------------

Waste Oil

-6000 KLA

13/07/2010

-----------------------------------13/07/2010
































24. M/s Ameet Lubricants and Chemicals S. N. 584/1 and 2, Garde Road, Saswad, Distt. Pune, Maharashtra

Used Oil

2160 KLA

------------------

Waste Oil

- 2000 KLA


25. M/s Samarth Petroleum,

Gut No. 653/1/C/211/2, Kumbhari Tal. South Solapur, Dist. Solapur, Maharashtra

Used Oil - 3600 KLA

01/09/2010

26. M/s Al Ali Mohammed Industries,

Sr. No. 57-1/2, Village Ghatesh Khurd, Khanivali Road, Tal-Wada, Dist. Thane – 421303 (Maharashtra)

Waste Oil - 18000 KLA ------------------ Used Oil - 6000 KLA

26/08/2010 _____________________ 26/08/2010

27. M/s Tribo Lubes Pvt. Ltd.,

Takai Adoshi Road, Village Honad, Post Saigaon, Survey No. 13/7A, 14/3, 15/6, Taluka Khalapur, Dist. Raigad, Maharashtra

Waste Oil - 9000 KLA _____________ Used Oil

- 7500 KLA

01/09/2010 __________________ 01/09/2010

28.

M/s Spear Petroleum Pvt.Ltd.

152 A, 15th Floor Maker Chamber No.III Nariman Point Mumbai-400 021

Waste Oil only

- 11000 KLA


29. M/s Poonam Petrochem Pvt.Ltd. Gut No.459, Dinkarpada Village – Kondle, Taluka – Wada Distt.Thane-421 312 Maharashtra

Used Oil

- 3000 KLA

Waste Oil

10/09/2014 13/05/2014







































- 6000 KLA

30. M/s Balaji Rang Udyog Pvt.Ltd. Plot No.44, MIDC Taloja Industrial Area(New Chemical Zone) Taloja-410 208, Distt.Raigad Maharashtra

Waste Oil

- 15000 KLA

13/05/2014

31. M/s Samarth Industries Plot No.N-22, MIDC Jalgaon-425 003 Maharashtra

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA

02/07/2014

32. M/s Plus Lubricants GUT No.228(P1), S.No.43 Abithghar, Taluka – Wada Distt.Thane Maharashtra

Used Oil

7500 KLA

Waste Oil

- 7500 KLA

07/05/2014 07/05/2014

ORISSA

1. M/s Raj Lubricants,

At/P.O. Januganj, Distt. Balasore-756019 Orissa

Used Oil -1500 KLA


2. M/s N.S. Chemicals, Plot No.37, Industrial Estate, IDC, Kalunga, Rourkela-770 031 Orissa

Used Oil

- 936 KLA

16/12.2013

3. M/s Namita Lubes, Plot No.S-3/52, Zone-B, Industrial Estate,

Used Oil

- 1200 KLA

16/12/2013








Mancheshwar, Bhubaneswar-751 010 Khurda Orissa

4. M/s Ratna Industrial, AT-Jamunanaki,PO-Kuarmunda, Distt.Sundargarh, Orissa

Used Oil

- 750 KLA

16/12/2013

5. M/s Maa Chandi Industries 193, Jagat Pur Industrial Area Cuttack Orissa

Used Oil

- 1000 KLA

14/06/2014

PONDICHEERY

1. M/s R. K. Industries,

3/5, Lingareddy Palayam, Pondicherry – 605 503

Used Oil

- 2400 KLA


MEGHALAYA

1. M/s Ambika Oils(North-East)Pvt.Ltd. Plot No.6, EPIP Area Bymihat-793 101 Meghalaya

Used Oil

- 1000 KLA

24/05/2014

PUNJAB

1. M/s Priya Chemicals and Allied Industries, Behind Rekha Petrol Pump, G. T. Road, P.O. Suranussi, Jalandhar – 144 027, Punjab

Used Oil

- 1620 KLA












2. M/s JOS Petro Limited, 239, Industrial Area –A, Ludhiana-141 003 Punjab

Used Oil

- 4500 KLA


3. M/s Om Udyod, Phase – 6, E-403, Focal Point Ludhiana, 141 010 Punjab

Used Oil - 2000 KLA

03/02/2010

4. M/s Sun Oil Company, C-115, Phase V, Focal Point Ludhiana-141010 Punjab

Used Oil 4500 KLA


5. M/s Aggarwal Manufacturing Company, Friends Industrial Estate, Plot No. 10, Opp. Aarti Steel Focal Point, Ludhiana-141010 Punjab

Used Oil - 1200 KLA


6. M/s Satkar Oil Company, D-177 Phase VI, Focal Point Ludhiana-141010 Punjab

Used Oil - 900 KLA


RAJASTHAN

1. M/s Anna Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. E-49, Growth centre, Phase-II, Ambaji Industrial Area, Abu Road, Dist, Sirohi, Rajasthan E-Mail : [email protected] [email protected]



2. M/s Malpani Petrochem (P) Ltd., G-1-214, RIICO Indl. Area, Kaladera, The Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Used Oil

- 1200 KLA
























3. M/s Bharat Oil Industries, C-194, MIA, IInd Phase, Basni, Jodhpur, Rajasthan

Used Oil

- 4200 KLA


4.

M/s Continental Petroleum Limited,

Plot No. A-166 & F-162-165, RIICO Indl. Area, Behror-301 701, Rajasthan E-mail: [email protected]

Used Oil

- 5600 KLA


5. M/s Sungrace Industries

C-29 (A), RIICO Indl. Area, Kaladera, Tehsil Chomu, Jaipur, (Rajasthan)

Used Oil

- 3000 KLA _____________ Waste Oil

- 3000 KLA

15/10/2009

6. M/s Sunil Lubricants Pvt. Ltd.

G-232, RIICO Industrial Area, Phase – III, Bhilwara – 311 001, Rajasthan

Used Oil

- 3000 KLA

15/01/2010

7. M/s Kotex Petro Chem Pvt. Ltd.

Khasra No. 655, Village-Sindrath, Tehsil & Distt. Sirohi -307001, Rajasthan

email: [email protected]

Waste Oil

- 13500 KLA

14/05/2010

8. M/s Jainam Industries (P) Ltd.

Plot No. 90,91,107 & 108 RIICO Industrial Area Sanwar, Tah. Mavli, Distt. Udaipur, Rajasthan

Waste Oil

- 12000 KLA

26/08/2010

9. M/s Indomax Chemical Industries,

F-783 (E), Road No. 13, V.K.I. Area,

Used Oil - 1200 KLA






































Jaipur (Rajasthan) Conditions specified in the registration certificate

10. M/s Shree Ganpati Lubricants,

A-405 (I), Road No. 9-F, VKIA, Jaipur, Rajasthan –302 013

Used Oil - 4500 KLA


11. M/s Shiv Shakti Oil & Lubricants F-557,Chopanki Industrial Area Bhiwadi – 301 019 Distt.Alwar (Rajasthan )

Used Oil - 3600 KLA


12. M/s Om Industries Plot No.C-60(A) Road No.1-Cm V.K.I Area Jaipur-302 013 Rajasthan

Used Oil - 3600 KLA


13. M/s Maheshwari Petro Chemicals G-681, Road No.9,F-2 Vishvakarma Industrial Area Jaipur Rajasthan

Used Oil - 3600 KLA


14. M/s Sahu Lubricants G-70-71, Bagra Ext. RIICO Industrial Area Bagru Distt.Jaipur Rajasthan

Used Oil - 3600 KLA


15. M/s Sahu Industries Plot No.G-679, Road No.9-F-2 Vishwakarma Industrial Area Jaipur-302 013 Rajasthan

Used Oil - 3600 KLA


16. M/s Shri Tirupati Industries G-491, Road No.9-A

Used Oil - 3600 KLA



http://cpcb.nic.in/oldwebsite/Hazardous Waste/terms&conditions.htm�

















Vishwakarma Industrial Area JAIPUR – 302 013 Rajasthan


17. M/s Mahabir Chemical Industries G-680, Road No.9-F-2 Vishwakarma Industrial Area Jaipur-302 013 Rajasthan

Used Oil - 3600 KLA


TAMILNADU

1. M/s Sun Rreclaimery,

Plot No. 25, Madurai Automobile Co-op. Industrial Estate, Kappalur, Madurai, Tamil Nadu-625 008

Used Oil only

- 4140 KLA


2. M/s Quality Lube Products Pvt. Ltd., # 35C & 36 A, SIDCO Industrial Estate Vichoor, Manali New Town, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600 103

Used Oil Only - 3600 MTA Waste Oil - 4800 KLA



3. M/s PMB & Company, 2/168-F, Jhulkashkulam Road, Thiruppanikarisal Kulam Road, Gandhinagar Post Sivarapalpuram, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu - 627 008

Waste Oil Only

- 2880 KLA


4. M/s Nagalakshmi Agencies, SF No. 540/1, Sarvanampatti Road, Vellakinar Village, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu- 641 029

Used Oil

– 3600 KLA






































5. M/s Balaji Industries, S. No. 16/4, , Malegoundan Palayam, Mettupalayam, Pollachi, Taluk, Coimatore, Dist. Tamil Nadu

Waste Oil

- 1200 KLA


6. M/s Laxmi Lubricants,

117, New Road, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin Dist. Tamil Nadu – 62 8501

Used Oil

- 2160 KLA _____________

Waste oil

- 2880 KLA


25/05/2010

7. M/s Jayam Refineries,

F-13, SIPCOT Growth Centre, Perundurai, Erode Dist., Tamil Nadu – 638 052

Used Oil

- 5400 KLA

10/01/2010

8. M/s Sasi Industries Plot No. 12, New No. 41-A, SIDCO Industrial Area , Dindigul, Tamil Nadu- 624 003

Used Oil

-1350 KLA


9. M/s Priya Petro Products, Developed Plot# 123, Vichoor Sidco Estate, Vichoor, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu

Used Oil

-2600 KLA ------------------- Waste Oil

- 3300 KLA

12/05/2010

UTTAR PRADESH

1. Bharat Oil Company(India) Regd.

E-18, Site 4, Sahibabad Indl. Area, Distt. Ghaziabad, U.P. Email: [email protected]@vsnl.com

Used Oil

- 10000 KLA










































Website : www.bharatoil.com

2. M/s Paswara Chemicals Ltd. Kayasth Gaonwari, Delhi Road Mohiuddinpur, Meerut U.P.

Waste Oil

- 31500 KLA


3. M/s Mineral Oil Corporation, D-13, Panki Industrial Area, Site-I, Kanpur - 208 022, U. P

Used Oil

- 1200 KLA


4. M/s Allen Oil Corporation,

B-33, Industrial Estate, Partapur, Meerut U.P

Used Oil

6000 KLA

04/09/2009

5. M/s Venus Oil Corporation E-53, Panki Indl. Area Site-III, Kanpur – 208 023 U. P

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA

26/09/2009

6. M/s Hindustan Refineries A-11, Site-II, Industrial Area, Rania, Kanpur Dehat, U.P

Used Oil

- 1368 KLA


7. M/s Indolube Refineries, G-21, Industrial Area, Gorakhpur, U.P

Used Oil

- 3000 KLA

14/05/2010

8. M/s Bharat Oil Company H-28 & 29, Site-I,

Used Oil

- 1440 KLA

14/05/2010



























Panki Industrial Area, Kanpur U. P

9.

M/s IFP Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. 16/2-C, Site -IV, Industrial Area Sahibabad-201010 Ghaziabad, U. P e-mail:[email protected]://www.cpcb.nic.in/mail%20to:[email protected]

Used Oil

- 6000 KLA


10. M/s Steam Oil & General Industries, C-187, Site No. 1 Bulandshahar Road Industrial Area Ghaziabad U. P

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA


11. M/s Dee Kay Industries, F-9, Site-1, Industrial Area Bulandshahar Road Ghaziabad U. P

Used Oil

- 1800 KLA

24/06/2010

12.

M/s Paswara Impex Ltd., E-97 to E-104, Udyog Puram Ind. Area Partapur, Meerut U. P

Waste Oil

- 18000 KLA

31/08/2010

13. M/s Kathooria Petro Products D-3,Site-II, UPSIDC Indl.Area, UNNAO U.P.

Used Oil

-3600 KLA

16/12/2013

14. M/s S.P. Chemical Works D-1/4-A, Sector-B, GIDA, Gorakhpur U.P

Used Oil

-3000 KLA

16/12/2013

mailto:[email protected]://www.cpcb.nic.in/mail to:[email protected]�




















15. M/s Sunder Lal Mittal Hathras Junction Road, Mendu, Hathras - 204 101 U.P

Used Oil

-600 KLA

04/01/2014

16. M/s Seema Oil Corporation Shyam Nagar, Foundary Nagar, Agra U.P.

Used Oil

-900 KLA

04/01/2014

17. M/s BSM Petrochem Pvt.Ltd. 8th Km Stone, Village- Saini Mawana Road, Meerut U.P.

Used Oil

- 6000 KLA

Waste Oil

- 18000 KLA

17/05/2014 17/05/2014

18. M/s S.V.Enterprises K-45,Site-III Panki Industrial Area Kanpur U.P.

Waste Oil

- 1800 KLA


WEST BENGAL

1. M/s Bristol Petroleum Pvt. Ltd. 26/5, D-E, A.M Ghosh Road Budge-Budge 24 Parganas(S), Kolkata-700 137 West Bengal

Waste Oil

- 15000 KLA _____________

Used Oil

- 8400 KLA


2. M/s Vermillion Petrochem Pvt. Ltd.

28/3, Salkia School Road Howrah -711 106

Used Oil

- 1000 KLA



















West Bengal registration certificate

3. M/s BA-MA Oil Industries Panchayat Road Kharial, PO - Dunkuni C.C District-Hooghly-711224 West Bengal

Used Oil

- 360 KLA


4. M/s Kundu Refinery Works Durgapur Highway Express Vill.Joykrishnapur, PO-Begampur Distt.Hooghly-712 306 West Bengal

Used Oil

- 3600 KLA

16/12/2013

5. M/s N.K. Company J.R. Industrial Estate Haran Molla Road, Village-Banagram P.O - Rasapunja, P.S - Bishnupur Distt.24, Parganas (South) West Bengal

Waste Oil

- 3400 KLA

16/06/2014

6. M/s Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. Grease Division P-43, Hide Road Extn. Kolkata – 700 088 West Bengal

Used Oil

- 1000 KLA









Documents

09.11.17 Addendum to the Environment Report for WB v4 - Finaldocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/... · 1 of 3 Addendum to the Environemntal and Social Assessment (ESA) Reports for