15 February 2016

David Cosgrove

Divisional Development Manager, New Zealand

AMP Capital

PwC Tower, 188 Quay Street,

Auckland 1010

David.Cosgrove@ampcapital.co.nz

Dear David,

Manukau Supa Centa Rezoning- 1/55 Lambie Drive, Manukau.

• AUGUSTA

Augusta Funds Management acts as property managers for Lambie Drive Nominees Ltd, who own the

property 1/55 Lambie Drive, in Manukau . This site is legally described as Unit PU A AU 1-14 DP 193176 ON

Lot 1 DP 193175.

Augusta Funds Management confirm that they fully support the submission made by AMP Capital Limited

that seeks to rezone all of that land within the Manukau Supa Centa, including 1/55 Lambie Drive, from

General Business Zone to Metropolitan Centre zone.

Augusta Funds Management requests that AMP Capital tables this letter to the Independent Hearing Panel

as part of the Topic 081 Rezoning hearing.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need to clarify anything in this letter.

Yours faithfully,

( .r~ Lohsing Cheng SENIOR ASSET MANAGER

AUGUSTA FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED

AUCKLAND PO Box 3 7953 Pam ell

Phone: 64 9 300 6161 Fax: 64 9 300 6162

NEW PLYMO UTH 335 Devon Street East P0Box44 New Plymouth 4340

Phone: 64 6 759 1520 Fax: 64 6 759 1521

\n\w.augusta.co.nz

91h March 2016

David Cosgrove Divisional Development Manager, New Zea land AMP Capita l Investors Limited PwC Tower, 188 Quay Street Auckland 1010

Dear David

A MURDOCH NEWEll

MANAGEMENT L TO

Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan - Rezoning of the Manukau Supa Centa and adjacent sites from General Business to Metropolitan Centre

Murdoch Newel l Management Limited (Murdoch Newell) is the owner of the site at 51 Lambie Drive. The site is nearly 10,000m2 in area and was developed in the 1980's with a single level office building of 1630m2

. The office bu ilding is currently leased to the New Zealand Red Cross, Auckland Chamber of Commerce and IHC.

Murdoch Newell supports the rezoning of the Manukau Supa Centa and adjacent sites (including 51 Lambie Drive) from General Business to Metropolitan Centre.

1 understand that the General Business zone provides for office development greater than 500m2 GFA per site as a Discretionary activity. The existing development at 51 Lambie Drive already far exceeds this limit, and any minor redevelopment of the existing building to add additional office space will require resource consent.

The existing development also under utilises the site area, and there is significant opportunity for redevelopment to occur. The General Business zone, which I understand is a large format retail zone, does not reflect the existing activity on the site and does not provide for the wide range of activities that are appropriate and desirable in this location.

I consider that the Metropolitan Centre zone reflects the existing connection between this site and the Manukau City Centre, and will enable the establishment of activities that are appropriate having regard to the existing private and public investment, and strategic location of the site.

I request that this letter be tabled at the Unitary Plan hearing for Topic 081 for the consideration of the Independent Hearings Panel.

Murdoch Newell Management Ltd PO Box 11488 Ellerslie, Auckland 1542

Level One 459 Great South Road Penrose, Auckland 1061

Phone 09 526 7999 Fax 09 526 7998

MITRE 10

7 March 2016

David Cosgrove Divisional Development Manager AMP Capital PwC Tower, 188 Quay Street Auckland 1010

Dear David

MANUKAU SUPA CENT A REZONING

Mitre 10 (New Zealand) Limited 46 View Road, Gl enfield Auckland 0627

Private Bag 102925, NSMC 0745 T: 09 443 9900 F: 09 443 9946 W: www.mitrelO.co.nz

Mitre 10 Holdings (NZ) Limited are the owners of 61 Lambie Drive, Manukau Central, legally described as Lot 2 DPS 193175 contained in NA122C/918 ('the Site') . The Site presently contains a Mitre 10 Mega store, and is the subject of a resource consent enabling additional smaller retail tenancies alongside the existing store. We note that the submission of AMP Capital Property Portfolio Limited, in association with Mitre 10 and three other neighbouring land owners, on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (ref. 5883) seeks that the Site be zoned 'Metropolitan Centre' rather than 'General Business' .

Mitre 10 Holdings (NZ) Limited wish to confirm that they fully support the AMP Capita l Property Portfolio Limited with regard to the rezoning of the wider Manukau Supa Centa (including the Site), from General Business Zone to Metropolitan Centre zone.

Mitre 10 Holdings (NZ) Limited requests that AMP Capital tables this letter to the Independent Hearing Panel as part of the Topic 081 Rezoning hearing.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need to clarify anything in this letter.

Yours sincerely

Harv~ Nonnan Harvey Norman Stores (NZ) Pry Limited Supa Centra, Ron wood Ave Pri vate Bag 94035 S.A. M.C Manu ka u City Auckland Phone 0064 9 2627050 Fax 0064 9 2624030 Cell 0064 2 1 901874 Emai I: J erome.O' Sulli van@nz.harveynorman .com

24 March 201 6

Dav id Cosgrove Di visional Development Manager, New Zealand AMP Capital In vestors Limited PwC Tower, 188 Quay Street Auckland 1010

Dear Dav id ,

Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan- Rezoning of the Manukau Supa Centa and adjacent sites from General Business to Metropolitan Centre

I. Harvey Norman Properties (NZ) Lim ited (Harvey Norman) is the owner of the Harvey Norman site within the Manukau Supa Centa at 51 Lambie Drive.

2. Harvey Norman supports the rezoning of the Manukau Supa Centa and adjacent sites from General Business to Metropo li tan Centre.

3. I understand that Bunnings Limited (Bunnings), the tenant on the site owned by Lambie Drive Nominees Ltd (1/55 Lambie Drive) seeks that 1/55 Lambie Drive remain as General Business but does not object to the balance of the site being rezoned to Metropolitan Centre.

4. The reasons given by Bunnings to oppose the Metropolitan Centre zone on their site include:

a) the potential costs of the higher amenity obj ectives of the Metropolitan Centre zone on thee tabl ished large format retail activities and trade supplier activities; and

b) potential incompatibility of sensitive activities with the estab lished large format retail and trade supp li er ac ti vities.

5. I do not agree with these concerns. Harvey Norman has stores within centres (including proposed Metropoli tan Centre zones) and in large form at retail developments (zoned General Business in the Unitary Plan). I do not consider that there are higher amenity costs of a centre location compared to a large format retail centre. Harvey No rman develops and maintains all its sites , whether in centre or in a large format retail development, to have high customer ameni ty.

6. Harvey Norman' s operational requirements, and in particular deli veri es of furni ture and other goods, are the same whether the store is located in a centre or a large format retail centre. Some of our stores, within Auckland or in other parts of the country, are located adjacent to or in proximity to res idential areas. As an example, the Mount Roskill store has a res idential zone along its rear boundary adjacent to the loading dock. This res idential zone interface does not unduly impact on the operation of the store.

7. I support the Metropolitan Centre zoning and the greater range and intensification of acti vities that it would enable to occur within the Manu kau Supa Centa and the balance of the site. The Manukau Supa Centa is a significant pat1 of the retail offer at Manukau City . It is a very successful centre with high foot traffic. I

HARVLY 1\0R'viAN STOReS (N.Z.l PTY. LTD. ACN: 072951 547

Head Office: Supa Centa. Level One. Ronwood Ave. Manukau Cit:.. Auckland. Ne11 Zealand. Private Bag 9-tO.\S. Manukau 2:241. Aud.Jand. New Zealand. Telephone: 64-9-262 7050. Fac,imilc. 6-t-9-:262 4030.

2

consider it appropriate to enable other ac tivities to co-loca te and support the ex isting centre development. consider the ac ti vities provided for under the Metropolitan Centre zone are compatible with and will enhance the existing centre.

8. I request that thi s letter be tabled at the Unitary Plan hearing for Topic 08 1 for the consideration of the Independent Hearings Panel.

Yours faithfull y

Jerome O ' Sulli v Development