53
ETAP 5.0 ETAP 5.0 Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. Protective Device Coordination

08 - Device Coordination

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 08 - Device Coordination

ETAP 5.0ETAP 5.0

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc.

Protective DeviceCoordination

Page 2: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 2

Agenda• OC Protective Device Coordination

– Concepts & Applications

• STAR 5.0.0 Overview– Features & Capabilities

• STAR Example 1

– Advance Topics• STAR Example 2

– PD Sequence of Operation– Device Libraries– ETAP ARTTS

Page 3: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 3

Definition

• Overcurrent Coordination– A systematic study of current responsive

devices in an electrical power system.

Page 4: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 4

Objective

• To determine the ratings and settings offuses, breakers, relay, etc.

• To isolate the fault or overloads.

Page 5: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 5

Criteria

• Economics

• Available Measures of Fault

• Operating Practices

• Previous Experience

Page 6: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 6

Design

• Open only PD upstream of the fault oroverload

• Provide satisfactory protection for overloads

• Interrupt SC as rapidly (instantaneously) aspossible

• Comply with all applicable standards andcodes

• Plot the Time Current Characteristics ofdifferent PDs

Page 7: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 7

Analysis

When:

• New electrical systems

• Plant electrical system expansion/retrofits

• Coordination failure in an existing plant

Page 8: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 8

Protection vs. Coordination

• Coordination is not an exact science

• Compromise between protection andcoordination– Reliability

– Speed

– Performance

– Economics

– Simplicity

Page 9: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 9

Protection

• Prevent injury to personnel

• Minimize damage to components

– Quickly isolate the affected portion of the system

– Minimize the magnitude of available short-circuit

Page 10: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 10

Spectrum Of Currents

• Load Current– Up to 100% of full-load

– 115-125% (mild overload)

• Overcurrent– Abnormal loading condition (Locked-Rotor)

• Fault Current– Fault condition

– Ten times the full-load current and higher

Page 11: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 11

Coordination

• Limit the extent and duration of serviceinterruption

• Selective fault isolation

• Provide alternate circuits

Page 12: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 12

Coordination

t

I

C B A

C

D

D B

A

Page 13: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 13

Equipment

• Motor

• Transformer

• Generator

• Cable

• Busway

Page 14: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 14

Capability / Damage Curves

t

I

I22t

Gen

I2t

MotorXfmr

I2t

Cable

I2t

Page 15: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 15

Transformer CategoryANSI/IEEE C-57.109

Minimumnameplate (kVA)Category Single-phase Three-phase

I 5-500 15-500II 501-1667 501-5000III 1668-10,000 5001-30,000IV above 1000 above 30,000

Page 16: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 16

Infrequent Fault Incidence Zones for Category II & III Transformers

* Should be selected by reference to the frequent-fault-incidence protection curve or fortransformers serving industrial, commercial and institutional power systems with secondary-sideconductors enclosed in conduit, bus duct, etc., the feeder protective device may be selected byreference to the infrequent-fault-incidence protection curve.

Source: IEEE C57

Source

Transformer primary-side protective device(fuses, relayed circuit breakers, etc.) may beselected by reference to the infrequent-fault-incidence protection curve

Category II or III Transformer

Fault will be cleared by transformerprimary-side protective device

Optional main secondary –side protective device.May be selected by reference to the infrequent-fault-incidence protection curve

Feeder protective device

Fault will be cleared by transformer primary-sideprotective device or by optional main secondary-side protection device

Fault will be cleared byfeeder protective device

Infrequent-FaultIncidence Zone*

Feeders

Frequent-FaultIncidence Zone*

Page 17: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 17

Transformer

t(sec)

I (pu)

Thermal200

2.5

I2t = 1250

2

25Isc

Mechanical

K=(1/Z)2t

(D-D LL) 0.87

(D-R LG) 0.58

Frequent Fault

Infrequent Fault

Inrush

FLA

Page 18: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 18

Page 19: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 19

Transformer Protection

MAXIMUM RATING OR SETTING FOR OVERCURRENT DEVICEPRIMARY SECONDARY

Over 600 Volts Over 600 Volts 600 Volts or Below

TransformerRated

Impedance

CircuitBreakerSetting

FuseRating

CircuitBreakerSetting

FuseRating

Circuit BreakerSetting or Fuse

Rating

Not more than6%

600 % 300 % 300 % 250% 125%(250% supervised)

More than 6%and not more

than 10%

400 % 300 % 250% 225% 125%(250% supervised)

Table 450-3(a) source: NEC

Page 20: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 20

Protective Devices• Fuse

• Relay (50/51 P, N, G, SG, 51V, 67, 46, 79, 21, …)

• Thermal Magnetic

• Low Voltage Solid State Trip

• Electro-Mechanical

• MCP

• Overload Heater

Page 21: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 21

Fuse

• Non Adjustable Device

• Continuous and Interrupting Rating

• Voltage Levels

• Characteristic Curves

– Min. Melting

– Total Clearing

• Application

Page 22: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 22

Minimum MeltingTime Curve

Total ClearingTime Curve

Page 23: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 23

Current Limiting Fuse(CLF)• Limits the peak current of short-circuit

• Reduces magnetic stresses (mechanicaldamage)

• Reduces thermal energy

Page 24: 08 - Device Coordination
Page 25: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 25

Symmetrical RMS Amperes

Pea

k Le

t-Thr

ough

Am

pere

s

100 A

60 A

15% PF (X/R = 6.6)

12,500

5,200

230,000

300 A

100,000

Let-Through Chart

Page 26: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 26

Fuse

Generally:

• CLF is a better short-circuit protection

• Non-CLF (expulsion fuse) is a betterOverload protection

Page 27: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 27

Selectivity Criteria

Typically:

• Non-CLF: 140% of full load

• CLF: 150% of full load

Page 28: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 28

Molder Case CB

• Thermal-Magnetic

• Magnetic Only

• Integrally Fused

• Current Limiting

• High InterruptingCapacity

Types

• Frame Size

• Trip Rating

• Interrupting Capability

• Voltage

Page 29: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 29

Thermal Minimum

Thermal Maximum

Magnetic(instantaneous)

Page 30: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 30

LVPCB

• Voltage and Frequency Ratings

• Continuous Current / Frame Size

– Override (12 times cont. current)

• Interrupting Rating

• Short-Time Rating (30 cycle)

• Fairly Simple to Coordinate

Page 31: 08 - Device Coordination

480 kV

CB 2

CB 1

CB 2CB 1

IT

ST PU

ST Band

LT PU

LT Band

If =30 kA

Page 32: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 32

Motor Protection

• Motor Starting Curve

• Thermal Protection

• Locked Rotor Protection

• Fault Protection

Page 33: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 33

Motor Overload Protection(NEC Art 430-32)

• Thermal O/L (Device 49)

• Motors with SF not less than 1.15– 125% of FLA

• Motors with temp. rise not over 40– 125% of FLA

• All other motors– 115% of FLA

Page 34: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 34

Locked Rotor Protection

• Thermal Locked Rotor (Device 51)

• Starting Time (TS < TLR)

• LRA– LRA sym

– LRA asym (1.5-1.6 x LRA sym) + 10% margin

Page 35: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 35

Fault Protection(NEC Art 430-52)

• Non-Time Delay Fuses– 300% of FLA

• Dual Element (Time-Delay Fuses)– 175% of FLA

• Instantaneous Trip Breaker– 800% of FLA*

• Inverse Time Breakers– 250% of FLA

*MCPs can be set higher

Page 36: 08 - Device Coordination

200 HP

MCPO/L

Starting Curve

I2T(49)

MCP (50)

(51)ts

tLR

LRAs LRAasym

Page 37: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 37

Overcurrent Relay

• Time-Delay (51 – I>)

• Short-Time Instantaneous ( I>>)

• Instantaneous (50 – I>>>)

• Electromagnetic (induction Disc)

• Solid State (Multi Function / Multi Level)

• Application

Page 38: 08 - Device Coordination
Page 39: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 39

Time-Overcurrent Unit

• Ampere Tap Calculation– Ampere Pickup (P.U.) = CT Ratio x A.T. Setting

– Relay Current (IR) = Actual Line Current (IL) / CTRatio

– Multiples of A.T. = IR/A.T. Setting

= IL/(CT Ratio x A.T. Setting)IL

IR

CT

51

Page 40: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 40

Instantaneous Unit

• Instantaneous Calculation– Ampere Pickup (P.U.) = CT Ratio x IT Setting

– Relay Current (IR) = Actual Line Current (IL) / CTRatio

– Multiples of IT = IR/IT Setting

= IL/(CT Ratio x IT Setting)IL

IR

CT

50

Page 41: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 41

Relay Coordination• Time margins should be maintained between T/C

curves• Adjustment should be made for CB opening time• Shorter time intervals may be used for solid state

relays• Upstream relay should have the same inverse T/C

characteristic as the downstream relay (CO-8 toCO-8) or be less inverse (CO-8 upstream to CO-6downstream)

• Extremely inverse relays coordinates very well withCLFs

Page 42: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 42

Fixed Points

• Motor starting curves

• Transformer damage curves &inrush points

• Cable damage curves

• SC maximum fault points

• Cable ampacities

Points or curves which do not changeregardless of protective device settings:

Page 43: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 43

Situation

Calculate Relay Setting (Tap, Inst. Tap & Time Dial)For This System

4.16 kV

DS 5 MVA

Cable

1-3/C 500 kcmilCU - EPR

CB

Isc = 30,000 A

6 %

50/51 Relay: IFC 53CT 800:5

Page 44: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 44

Solution

AInrsuh 328,869412I =×=

A338.4800

5II LR =×=

Transformer: AkV

kVAL 694

16.43000,5I =×

=

IL

CTRIR

Set Relay:

A551.52800

5328,8)50(

1)38.1(6/4.3380.6

4.5338.4%125

=>=×=

==

=×=

AInst

TDATAP

A

Page 45: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 45

Question

What is ANSI Shift Curve?

Page 46: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 46

Answer

• For delta-delta connected transformers, withline-to-line faults on the secondary side, thecurve must be reduced to 87% (shift to theleft by a factor of 0.87)

• For delta-wye connection, with single line-to-ground faults on the secondary side, thecurve values must be reduced to 58% (shiftto the left by a factor of 0.58)

Page 47: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 47

Question

What is meant by Frequent andInfrequent for transformers?

Page 48: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 48

AnswerInfrequent Fault Incidence Zones for Category II & III Transformers

Source

Transformer primary-side protective device(fuses, relayed circuit breakers, etc.) May beselected by reference to the infrequent-fault-incidence protection curve

Category II or III Transformer

Fault will be cleared by transformerprimary-side protective device

Optional main secondary –side protective device.May be selected by reference to the infrequent-fault-incidence protection curve

Feeder protective device

Fault will be cleared by transformer primary-sideprotective device or by optional main secondary-side protection device

Fault will be cleared byfeeder protective device

Infrequent-FaultIncidence Zone*

Feeders

Frequent-FaultIncidence Zone*

Page 49: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 49

Question

What T/C Coordination interval should bemaintained between relays?

Page 50: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 50

Answer

At

I

B

CB Opening Time

+

Induction Disc Overtravel (0.1 sec)

+

Safety margin (0.2 sec w/o Inst. & 0.1 sec w/ Inst.)

Page 51: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 51

Question

What is Class 10 and Class 20Thermal OLR curves?

Page 52: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 52

Answer

• Class 10 for fast trip, 10 seconds or less

• Class 20 for, 20 seconds or less

• There is also a Class 30 for long trip time

Page 53: 08 - Device Coordination

Copyright 2004 Operation Technology, Inc. – Workshop Notes: Protective Device Coordination Slide 53

Answer