08 British India

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    1/12

    Case Study of Empire:

    The British Empire in India

    Professor Lavender

    21 March 2005

    Sgt. B ayes of the 18th Huss ars Britis h Eas t India C ompan y Flag

    British East India Company

    The history of British

    imperialism in India is

    inextricable from thehistory of the British East

    India Company (EIC)

    Warren Hastings, First

    Indian Governor General

    British East India Company

    At the start of the 18th

    century, the East India

    Company's presence in

    India was one of trade

    outposts.

    George Vertue, The Old East India House inLeadenhall Street, London (1711)

    British East India Company

    But by the end

    of the century,

    the Company

    was militarily

    dominant over

    South India

    and rapidly

    extending

    northward.New East India House, 1880s

    The Expansion of the EIC:

    Two Phases

    To 1850

    Expand from presence

    on coast (1750s) to

    take over center of

    India.

    War on land in eastern

    and south-eastern

    India.

    Gain control over the

    rich province of

    Bengal.

    1850-1870s

    Consolidate control over

    Bengal and rest of east and

    southeast.

    Extend EIC control up the

    Ganges valley to Delhi.

    Subdue all remaining Indian

    states of any consequence:

    either by conquering them;

    or by forcing their rulers to

    become subordinate allies

    British East India Company History

    1600: East India

    Company founded and

    given a monopoly of all

    English trade to Asia by

    royal grant.

    Traded with all of Asia --esp. China & India

    East India Company ShipSeal of the East India Company

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    2/12

    British East India Company History

    Company evolved

    into the worlds

    largest corporation

    by 1700.

    Funded by the

    purchase of shares

    and bonds.

    20-30 ships/year sent

    to Asia.

    Annual sales in

    London were worth

    up to 2 million.

    East India Company Stock

    British East India Company in India

    By 1800, EIC turned

    focus to India.

    Cotton cloth woven

    by Indian weavers

    imported into Britain

    in huge quantities to

    supply a worldwide

    demand for cheap,

    washable,

    lightweight fabrics

    for dresses and

    furnishings.

    Indian Fabric Printer at work

    Indian Textiles

    The Company's main settlements -- Bombay, Madras

    and Calcutta -- established in the Indian provinces

    where cotton textiles for export were most readily

    available.

    Indian Tailor with Wife of an EIC Official

    British India in 1848

    A cloth merchant seated in his

    shop selling chintz to a

    customer, painted by a

    Tanjoreartist, circa 1800.

    A pile-carpet loom at Hunsur, Mysore, 1850.

    Settlements evolved

    from factories or

    trading posts into

    major commercial

    towns under British

    jurisdiction. Indian merchants and

    artisans moved in to

    do business with the

    Company and with the

    British inhabitants

    who lived there.

    Bombay, Madras and Calcutta

    Bantam Market

    The City of Surat, First Trading Port for English in India

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    3/12

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    4/12

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    5/12

    Military Expansion of the East India Company

    East India Company Official in

    Company Uniform

    Field Officer of the East India Company

    Guard

    As the EIC

    expanded and

    demanded to play

    a larger role inlocal politics and

    administration, its

    need for an army

    increased.

    This need was

    answered by

    importing British

    soldiers and

    increasing Sepoys.

    Military Expansion of the East India Company

    Armed troops of the East India Company, 1840s

    But relations with Sepoy troops deterioriated as the

    EIC began to require them to act more British

    Introduction of pork and beef lard as rifle cartridge

    lubricant triggers the Sepoy Mutiny (1858)

    Military Expansion of the East India Company

    Mugal Attack on the British Fort at Bombay, 1858

    Reasons for the Mutiny Christian Evangelism

    in India after 1834

    Had been kept out by

    the EIC for fear of

    offending locals

    But British Parliament

    had forced EIC to open

    borders to missionaries

    in 1834.

    Changing Status of

    Sepoy troops

    Decreasing Pay

    Replacement of Sepoyofficers with English-

    trained ones

    1856 General Service

    Enlistment Act

    Overseas service

    requirement for all

    enlisted men

    Offensive to Hindus

    In Hindu belief,

    crossing the ocean

    would make them

    ritually impure

    requiring expensive

    purification

    ceremonies

    or else becoming

    outcasts in their home

    communities.

    Loss of Military

    Careers.

    The Last Straw

    1856, Enfield Rifles issued to EIC Army

    Soldiers required to bite ends off the cartridges;

    cartridges were greased with lard and tallow

    For Muslims and Hindus, contact with either

    would make them unclean and cause a loss of

    caste status; and this seemed specifically aimed at

    their religious identity.

    May 9, 1857: 85 Sepoys beaten and imprisoned for

    refusing orders to use them

    May 10, 1857: Bengal regiment mutinied in protest

    and killed their British commanders The Attack of Mutineers, July 30, 1857

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    6/12

    Battle of Lucknow, June 1857British Depiction of the Sepoy Mutineers: Sepoy Indian troops dividing the spoils after

    their mutiny against British rule

    British Depiction of the Sepoy Mutineers

    British Reaction We shall never again occupy a

    high ground in India until we

    have put a yoke upon the

    Brahmins. We have conceded

    too much to the insolence of

    caste. Not one high caste man

    should henceforward be

    entrusted with a sword.... He

    has been trusted with power,

    and how has he betrayed it?

    The graves of 100 English

    women and childrenworse,

    the unburied bones of those

    poor victimsare the

    monuments of high bred sepoy

    chivalry. --Delhi Gazette

    British Retribution Within the Military

    "Eradication" of Sepoy

    regiments

    51st and 26th regiments

    killed in their entirety

    John Lawrence wrote to

    the British high command

    in August 1857:

    We have killed and

    drowned 500 out of the

    600 men of the [26th]

    regiment.

    Indian troops killed with English

    cannons in the aftermath of the Sepoy

    mutiny, 1858

    British Retribution vs. Civilians Colonel James Neill and the

    Bloody Assizes beginning in

    Allahabad on June 11, 1857.

    Every native that appeared in

    sight was shot down without

    question, and in the morning

    Colonel Neill sent out parties of

    regiment [?]...and burned all the

    villages near where the ruins of

    our bungalows stood, and hung

    every native that they could

    catch, on the trees that lined the

    road. Another party of soldiers

    penetrated into the native city

    and set fire to it, whilst volley

    after volley of grape and

    canister was poured into the

    fugitives as they fled from their

    burning houses. Capture of Lucknow (detail)

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    7/12

    The Bloody Assizes June 29 1857:

    Neill orders "the village of

    Mullagu and neighborhood to

    be attacked and destroyed

    slaughter all the men take no

    prisoners. All insurgents that

    fall into good hands hang at

    onceand shoot all you can.

    A British Soldier in Delhi: All

    the people found within the

    walls when our troops entered

    were bayoneted on the spot.

    These were not mutineers but

    residents of the city, who

    trusted to our well-known mild

    rule for pardon. I am glad to say

    they were disappointed.

    The judge in charge of trials at

    Bareilly had lost his wife during the

    conflict; he told McCausland:

    If ever I get the chance of [judging]

    these Black rebels I will hang a manfor every hair that was in my wifes

    head.

    He had executed close on 700 well

    I said if you just continue you will

    have made good your work and

    turning to Sergt Aden I said you

    mind what Sir Colin [Campbell]

    said to us at Cawnpore that every

    man that had a black face was our

    enemy and we could not do wrong

    in shooting him so you know how to

    act here. -- David McAusland of

    the 42nd Highland Regiment (diary)

    Massacre at Satchiura Ghatin

    Cawnpore, July 15, 1857

    Reactions to the Massacre Huge coverage in Britain

    London Times alone carried 108

    stories about the massacre between

    August 15, 1857 and February 3,

    1860.

    Lurid accounts dwelling

    on rape and race women being raped in front of

    their children before being

    killed,

    of matted blood, gory remains of

    childrens limbs,

    of the suffocation of living

    children among their dead

    mothers when the victims werethrown into a well.

    British Calls for Vengeance Every British heart, from the

    highest to the humblest of the

    land, glows with honest wrath,

    and demands justice, prompt and

    unsparing, on the bloodyminded

    instruments of the Rebellion. --

    The Illustrated London News

    London Times,Morning Post,andNewcastle Chronicle:

    Muslim and Hindu rebels must

    be exterminated

    The paramount duty of the

    British Government is now

    retribution a duty to the dead

    and living. --Delhi Gazette

    No mercy's shown to men

    whose hands/ With women's

    blood yet reek! --Delhi Gazette

    Official British military dispatches

    depicted Sepoys as

    demons, fiends, and niggers

    led by passions to faithlessness,

    rebellion, and crimes at which the

    heart sickens,

    as gangs of black satyrs,

    members of that venom race, inheart as black as face.

    Brevet-Major R.Poorewrites

    home in 1857:

    The race of men in India are

    certainly the most abominable,

    degraded lot of brutes that you can

    imagine, they don't seem to have a

    single good quality.

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    8/12

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    9/12

    Advantages for those

    who convert:

    Education

    Jobs as Missionaries

    Access to English

    Privilege

    Cultural Imperialism

    Indian cultural

    practices:

    Sati (Suttee) banned

    1828

    Thugs (Thuggee)

    banned in 1830s

    Suttee

    Sati and Swinging, 1815

    Invented Cultural Practices Apartheid

    In India every European, be he German, or

    Pole or Rumanian, is automatically a

    member of the ruling race. Railway

    carriages, station retiring rooms, benches in

    parks, etc. are marked 'For Europeans Only.'This is bad enough in South Africa or

    elsewhere, but to have to put up with it in

    one's own country is a humiliating and

    exasperating reminder of one's enslaved

    condition. -- Jawaharlal Nehru, Indian

    nationalist and first Prime Minister

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    10/12

    1858: In aftermath of the 1857 Uprising, Britain seizes

    direct rule over India

    Direct British Rule

    1869: Suez Canal

    opened

    Canal reduced the

    sailing time between

    Britain and India from

    about three months to

    only three weeks

    Enabled London to

    exercise tight control

    over all aspects of

    Indian trade.

    Suez Canal

    Railroads, roads,

    and communications

    developed

    To bring raw

    materials, especially

    cotton, to ports for

    shipment to England

    To bring

    manufactured goods

    from England for

    sale in an expanding

    Indian market.

    Railway Bridges in India, 1900 (top) and 1930 (bottom)

    British-owned Indian

    industry expanded

    from 1880 to 1914,

    but not Indian.

    India remained agricultural In 1914 less than 5% of national income

    came from industry

    Less than 1 percent of Indias workforce

    was employed in factories.

    1877: Massive

    Famine in Madras

    Immediate cause was a

    drought which lasted

    two years But exacerbated by

    British control over

    food prices

    And British use of

    food as way to control

    economy

    Post-Railroad Famines in

    19th-Century India

    1865-66: Bengal, Bihar,

    Orissa.

    Orissa worst hit; 1 million

    died in the three districts.

    1876-8: Maharashtra and

    South India (7 million)

    1896: Maharashtra and

    South India

    1899-1900: Gujarat and

    Rajasthan

    Famine as the measure of British policies

    1. Rain failure.

    2. Hoarding by traders and urban

    moneylenders. Export of grain.

    3. Attacks on grain shops and

    stores. Upsurge in robberies.

    4. At normal harvest time, British

    government demands tax. Manypeasants refuse to pay. Leads to

    coercion by tax-officials, forcing

    richer peasants to pay up. Poorer

    peasants have land confiscated, or

    mortgage or sell property -

    jewellery, farm implements, land -

    to moneylenders to pay taxes.

    Richest peasants and moneylenders

    enlarge their holdings.

    5. British Government

    establishes relief works, to

    which poorest peasants go.

    Middling peasants, and higher

    castes without resources starve.

    British government punishes

    those who refuse to enter relief

    works by cutting rations

    6. Destitute start to wander in

    search of food. Some receive

    charitable relief in towns.

    7. There are suicides, parents

    sell or kill children, deaths

    (often of disease).

    DEATH TOLL: 7 Million.

    Famine in Madras, 1877

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    11/12

    State-sanctioned ration for Madras, set by Sir Richard Temple,

    British Madras President

    Source: Mike Davis,Late Victorian Holocausts: El Nino,

    Famines and the Making of the Third World(Verso, 2001).

    Pierre Loti arrived at

    Rajputana in 1899 by train

    to a haunting scene of

    wailing emaciated children:

    "Oh! look at the poor little things

    jostling there against the barrier,

    stretching out their withered

    hands towards us from the end of

    the bones which represent their

    arms. Every part of their meagre

    skeleton protrudes with shocking

    visibility through the brown skin

    that hangs in folds about them;

    their stomachs are so sunken that

    one might think that their bowels

    had been altogether removed.

    Flies swarm on their lips and

    eyes, drinking what moisture may

    still exude... Source: Mike Davis,

    Late Victorian Holocausts

    Villagers inRajputanain 1899;Nearly a million villagers died in

    the famine.

    Famine in Rajputana, 1899

    The last of the Herd, Madras (during the famine 1876-1878), Tamil Nadu, South India

    Characteristics of British Rule in

    India

    Change in policies and attitudes

    Impact of Sepoy Mutiny (or Indian

    Rebellion of 1857-58)

    Establishment of British Control, 1859

    Full-On Empire: apartheid, cultural

    imperialism

    Evaluation: famine

    Evaluating British Rule in India

    Arundhati Roy, The New American

    Century, The Nation (January 22, 2004):

    Debating Imperialism is a bit like debatingthe pros and cons of rape. What can we say?

    That we really miss it?

    The entire article

  • 7/31/2019 08 British India

    12/12

    Evaluating British Rule in India

    Dinesh D'Souza, "Two Cheers forColonialism," The Chronicle of Higher

    Education (May 10, 2002)

    "The West did not become rich and

    powerful through colonial oppression.....

    The descendants of colonialism are better

    off than they would be if colonialism had

    never happened.

    The entire article

    End